An all atom energy based computational protocol for predicting binding affinities of protein-ligand complexes

We report here a computationally fast protocol for predicting binding affinities of non-metallo protein-ligand complexes. The protocol builds in an all atom energy based empirical scoring function comprising electrostatics, van der Waals, hydrophobicity and loss of conformational entropy of protein side chains upon ligand binding. The method is designed to ensure transferability across diverse systems and has been validated on a heterogenous dataset of 161 complexes consisting of 55 unique protein targets. The scoring function trained on a dataset of 61 complexes yielded a correlation of r=0.92 for the predicted binding free energies against the experimental binding affinities. Model validation and parameter analysis studies ensure the predictive ability of the scoring function. When tested on the remaining 100 protein-ligand complexes a correlation of r=0.92 was recovered. The high correlation obtained underscores the potential applicability of the methodology in drug design endeavors. The scoring function has been web enabled at as binding affinity prediction of protein-ligand (BAPPL) server.     

FLIPDock: docking flexible ligands into flexible receptors

Conformational changes of biological macromolecules when binding with ligands have long been observed and remain a challenge for automated docking methods. Here we present a novel protein-ligand docking software called FLIPDock (Flexible LIgand-Protein Docking) allowing the automated docking of flexible ligand molecules into active sites of flexible receptor molecules. In FLIPDock, conformational spaces of molecules are encoded using a data structure that we have developed recently called the Flexibility Tree (FT). While the FT can represent fully flexible ligands, it was initially designed as a hierarchical and multiresolution data structure for the selective encoding of conformational subspaces of large biological macromolecules. These conformational subspaces can be built to span a range of conformations important for the biological activity of a protein. A variety of motions can be combined, ranging from domains moving as rigid bodies or backbone atoms undergoing normal mode-based deformations, to side chains assuming rotameric conformations. In addition, these conformational subspaces are parameterized by a small number of variables which can be searched during the docking process, thus effectively modeling the conformational changes in a flexible receptor. FLIPDock searches the variables using genetic algorithm-based search techniques and evaluates putative docking complexes with a scoring function based on the AutoDock3.05 force-field. In this paper, we describe the concepts behind FLIPDock and the overall architecture of the program. We demonstrate FLIPDock's ability to solve docking problems in which the assumption of a rigid receptor previously prevented the successful docking of known ligands. In particular, we repeat an earlier cross docking experiment and demonstrate an increased success rate of 93.5%, compared to original 72% success rate achieved by AutoDock over the 400 cross-docking calculations. We also demonstrate FLIPDock's ability to handle conformational changes involving backbone motion by docking balanol to an adenosine-binding pocket of protein kinase A.     

Docking multiple conformations of a flexible ligand into a protein binding site using NMR restraints

A method is described for docking a large, flexible ligand using intra-ligand conformational restraints from exchange-transferred NOE (etNOE) data. Numerous conformations of the ligand are generated in isolation, and a subset of representative conformations is selected. A crude model of the protein-ligand complex is used as a template for overlaying the selected ligand structures, and each complex is conformationally relaxed by molecular mechanics to optimize the interaction. Finally, the complexes were assessed for structural quality. Alternative approaches are described for the three steps of the method: generation of the initial docking template; selection of a subset of ligand conformations; and conformational sampling of the complex. The template is generated either by manual docking using interactive graphics or by a computational grid-based search of the binding site. A subset of conformations from the total number of peptides calculated in isolation is selected based on either low energy and satisfaction of the etNOE restraints, or a cluster analysis of the full set. To optimize the interactions in the complex, either a restrained Monte Carlo-energy minimization (MCM) protocol or a restrained simulated annealing (SA) protocol were used. This work produced 53 initial complexes of which 8 were assessed in detail. With the etNOE conformational restraints, all of the approaches provide reasonable models. The grid-based approach to generate an initial docking template allows a large volume to be sampled, and as a result, two distinct binding modes were identified for a fifteen-residue peptide binding to an enzyme active site.     

A knowledge-guided strategy for improving the accuracy of scoring functions in binding affinity prediction

Background  

Current scoring functions are not very successful in protein-ligand binding affinity prediction albeit their popularity in structure-based drug designs. Here, we propose a general knowledge-guided scoring (KGS) strategy to tackle this problem. Our KGS strategy computes the binding constant of a given protein-ligand complex based on the known binding constant of an appropriate reference complex. A good training set that includes a sufficient number of protein-ligand complexes with known binding data needs to be supplied for finding the reference complex. The reference complex is required to share a similar pattern of key protein-ligand interactions to that of the complex of interest. Thus, some uncertain factors in protein-ligand binding may cancel out, resulting in a more accurate prediction of absolute binding constants.     

Discrete molecular dynamics distinguishes nativelike binding poses from decoys in difficult targets

Virtual screening is one of the major tools used in computer-aided drug discovery. In structure-based virtual screening, the scoring function is critical to identifying the correct docking pose and accurately predicting the binding affinities of compounds. However, the performance of existing scoring functions has been shown to be uneven for different targets, and some important drug targets have proven especially challenging. In these targets, scoring functions cannot accurately identify the native or near-native binding pose of the ligand from among decoy poses, which affects both the accuracy of the binding affinity prediction and the ability of virtual screening to identify true binders in chemical libraries. Here, we present an approach to discriminating native poses from decoys in difficult targets for which several scoring functions failed to correctly identify the native pose. Our approach employs Discrete Molecular Dynamics simulations to incorporate protein-ligand dynamics and the entropic effects of binding. We analyze a collection of poses generated by docking and find that the residence time of the ligand in the native and nativelike binding poses is distinctly longer than that in decoy poses. This finding suggests that molecular simulations offer a unique approach to distinguishing the native (or nativelike) binding pose from decoy poses that cannot be distinguished using scoring functions that evaluate static structures. The success of our method emphasizes the importance of protein-ligand dynamics in the accurate determination of the binding pose, an aspect that is not addressed in typical docking and scoring protocols.     

istar: A Web Platform for Large-Scale Protein-Ligand Docking

Protein-ligand docking is a key computational method in the design of starting points for the drug discovery process. We are motivated by the desire to automate large-scale docking using our popular docking engine idock and thus have developed a publicly-accessible web platform called istar. Without tedious software installation, users can submit jobs using our website. Our istar website supports 1) filtering ligands by desired molecular properties and previewing the number of ligands to dock, 2) monitoring job progress in real time, and 3) visualizing ligand conformations and outputting free energy and ligand efficiency predicted by idock, binding affinity predicted by RF-Score, putative hydrogen bonds, and supplier information for easy purchase, three useful features commonly lacked on other online docking platforms like DOCK Blaster or iScreen. We have collected 17,224,424 ligands from the All Clean subset of the ZINC database, and revamped our docking engine idock to version 2.0, further improving docking speed and accuracy, and integrating RF-Score as an alternative rescoring function. To compare idock 2.0 with the state-of-the-art AutoDock Vina 1.1.2, we have carried out a rescoring benchmark and a redocking benchmark on the 2,897 and 343 protein-ligand complexes of PDBbind v2012 refined set and CSAR NRC HiQ Set 24Sept2010 respectively, and an execution time benchmark on 12 diverse proteins and 3,000 ligands of different molecular weight. Results show that, under various scenarios, idock achieves comparable success rates while outperforming AutoDock Vina in terms of docking speed by at least 8.69 times and at most 37.51 times. When evaluated on the PDBbind v2012 core set, our istar platform combining with RF-Score manages to reproduce Pearson''s correlation coefficient and Spearman''s correlation coefficient of as high as 0.855 and 0.859 respectively between the experimental binding affinity and the predicted binding affinity of the docked conformation. istar is freely available at http://istar.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/idock.     

High quality binding modes in docking ligands to proteins

Multiple near-optimal conformations of protein-ligand complexes provide a better chance for accurate representation of biomolecular interactions, compared with a single structure. We present ISE-dock--a docking program which is based on the iterative stochastic elimination (ISE) algorithm. ISE eliminates values that consistently lead to the worst results, thus optimizing the search for docking poses. It constructs large sets of such poses with no additional computational cost compared with single poses. ISE-dock is validated using 81 protein-ligand complexes from the PDB and its performance was compared with those of Glide, GOLD, and AutoDock. ISE-dock has a better chance than the other three to find more than 60% top single poses under RMSD = 2.0 A and more than 80% under RMSD = 3.0 A from experimental. ISE alone produced at least one 3.0 A or better solutions among the top 20 poses in the entire test set. In 98% of the examined molecules, ISE produced solutions that are closer than 2.0 A from experimental. Paired t-tests (PTT) were used throughout to assess the significance of comparisons between the performances of the different programs. ISE-dock provides more than 100-fold docking solutions in a similar time frame as LGA in AutoDock. We demonstrate the usefulness of the large near optimal populations of ligand poses by showing a correlation between the docking results and experiments that support multiple binding modes in p38 MAP kinase (Pargellis et al., Nat Struct Biol 2002;9:268-272] and in Human Transthyretin (Hamilton, Benson, Cell Mol Life Sci 2001;58:1491-1521).     

Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions

The development and validation of a new knowledge-based scoring function (DrugScore) to describe the binding geometry of ligands in proteins is presented. It discriminates efficiently between well-docked ligand binding modes (root-mean-square deviation <2.0 A with respect to a crystallographically determined reference complex) and those largely deviating from the native structure, e.g. generated by computer docking programs. Structural information is extracted from crystallographically determined protein-ligand complexes using ReLiBase and converted into distance-dependent pair-preferences and solvent-accessible surface (SAS) dependent singlet preferences for protein and ligand atoms. Definition of an appropriate reference state and accounting for inaccuracies inherently present in experimental data is required to achieve good predictive power. The sum of the pair preferences and the singlet preferences is calculated based on the 3D structure of protein-ligand binding modes generated by docking tools. For two test sets of 91 and 68 protein-ligand complexes, taken from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), the calculated score recognizes poses generated by FlexX deviating <2 A from the crystal structure on rank 1 in three quarters of all possible cases. Compared to FlexX, this is a substantial improvement. For ligand geometries generated by DOCK, DrugScore is superior to the "chemical scoring" implemented into this tool, while comparable results are obtained using the "energy scoring" in DOCK. None of the presently known scoring functions achieves comparable power to extract binding modes in agreement with experiment. It is fast to compute, regards implicitly solvation and entropy contributions and produces correctly the geometry of directional interactions. Small deviations in the 3D structure are tolerated and, since only contacts to non-hydrogen atoms are regarded, it is independent from assumptions of protonation states.     

How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding

Proteins are dynamic molecules and often undergo conformational change upon ligand binding. It is widely accepted that flexible loop regions have a critical functional role in enzymes. Lack of consideration of binding site flexibility has led to failures in predicting protein functions and in successfully docking ligands with protein receptors. Here we address the question: which sequence and structural features distinguish the structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? We analyze high-resolution crystal structures of ligand bound (holo) and free (apo) forms of 41 proteins where no conformational change takes place upon ligand binding, 35 examples with moderate conformational change, and 22 cases where a large conformational change has been observed. We find that the number of residue-residue contacts observed per-residue (contact density) does not distinguish flexible and rigid binding sites, suggesting a role for specific interactions and amino acids in modulating the conformational changes. Examination of hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions reveals that cases that do not undergo conformational change have high polar interactions constituting the binding pockets. Intriguingly, the large, aromatic amino acid tryptophan has a high propensity to occur at the binding sites of examples where a large conformational change has been noted. Further, in large conformational change examples, hydrophobic-hydrophobic, aromatic-aromatic, and hydrophobic-polar residue pair interactions are dominant. Further analysis of the Ramachandran dihedral angles (phi, psi) reveals that the residues adopting disallowed conformations are found in both rigid and flexible cases. More importantly, the binding site residues adopting disallowed conformations clustered narrowly into two specific regions of the L-Ala Ramachandran map. Examination of the dihedral angles changes upon ligand binding shows that the magnitude of phi, psi changes are in general minimal, although some large changes particularly between right-handed alpha-helical and extended conformations are seen. Our work further provides an account of conformational changes in the dihedral angles space. The findings reported here are expected to assist in providing a framework for predicting protein-ligand complexes and for template-based prediction of protein function.     

CScore: a simple yet effective scoring function for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction using modified CMAC learning architecture

Protein-ligand docking is a computational method to identify the binding mode of a ligand and a target protein, and predict the corresponding binding affinity using a scoring function. This method has great value in drug design. After decades of development, scoring functions nowadays typically can identify the true binding mode, but the prediction of binding affinity still remains a major problem. Here we present CScore, a data-driven scoring function using a modified Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller (CMAC) learning architecture, for accurate binding affinity prediction. The performance of CScore in terms of correlation between predicted and experimental binding affinities is benchmarked under different validation approaches. CScore achieves a prediction with R = 0.7668 and RMSE = 1.4540 when tested on an independent dataset. To the best of our knowledge, this result outperforms other scoring functions tested on the same dataset. The performance of CScore varies on different clusters under the leave-cluster-out validation approach, but still achieves competitive result. Lastly, the target-specified CScore achieves an even better result with R = 0.8237 and RMSE = 1.0872, trained on a much smaller but more relevant dataset for each target. The large dataset of protein-ligand complexes structural information and advances of machine learning techniques enable the data-driven approach in binding affinity prediction. CScore is capable of accurate binding affinity prediction. It is also shown that CScore will perform better if sufficient and relevant data is presented. As there is growth of publicly available structural data, further improvement of this scoring scheme can be expected.     

Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions

Background  

A key component in protein structure prediction is a scoring or discriminatory function that can distinguish near-native conformations from misfolded ones. Various types of scoring functions have been developed to accomplish this goal, but their performance is not adequate to solve the structure selection problem. In addition, there is poor correlation between the scores and the accuracy of the generated conformations.     

Atomistic modeling of protein-DNA interaction specificity: progress and applications

An accurate, predictive understanding of protein-DNA binding specificity is crucial for the successful design and engineering of novel protein-DNA binding complexes. In this review, we summarize recent studies that use atomistic representations of interfaces to predict protein-DNA binding specificity computationally. Although methods with limited structural flexibility have proven successful at recapitulating consensus binding sequences from wild-type complex structures, conformational flexibility is likely important for design and template-based modeling, where non-native conformations need to be sampled and accurately scored. A successful application of such computational modeling techniques in the construction of the TAL-DNA complex structure is discussed. With continued improvements in energy functions, solvation models, and conformational sampling, we are optimistic that reliable and large-scale protein-DNA binding prediction and engineering is a goal within reach.     

Virtual ligand screening against Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: improving docking enrichment using physics-based methods

Motivated by their participation in the McMaster Data-Mining and Docking Competition, the authors developed 2 new computational technologies and applied them to docking against Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: a receptor preparation procedure that incorporates rotamer optimization of side chains and a physics-based rescoring procedure for estimating relative binding affinities of the protein-ligand complexes. Both methods use the same energy function, consisting of the all-atom OPLS-AA force field and a generalized Born solvent model, which treats the protein receptor and small-molecule ligands in a consistent manner. Thus, the energy function is similar to that used in more sophisticated approaches, such as free-energy perturbation and the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann/surface area, but sampling during the rescoring procedure is limited to simple energy minimization of the ligand. The use of a highly efficient minimization algorithm permitted the authors to apply this rescoring procedure to hundreds of thousands of protein-ligand complexes during the competition, using a modest Linux cluster. To test these methods, they used the 12 competitive inhibitors identified in the training set, plus methotrexate, as positive controls in enrichment studies with both the training and test sets, each containing 50,000 compounds. The key conclusion is that combining the receptor preparation and rescoring methods makes it possible to identify most of the positive controls within the top few tenths of a percent of the rank-ordered training and test set libraries.     

Automated docking of ligands to antibodies: methods and applications

Many approaches to studying protein-ligand interactions by computational docking are currently available. Given the structures of a protein and a ligand, the ultimate goal of all docking methods is to predict the structure of the resulting complex. This requires a suitable representation of molecular structures and properties, search algorithms to efficiently scan the configuration space for favorable interaction geometries, and accurate scoring functions to evaluate and rank the generated orientations. For many of the available methods, tests on experimentally known antibody-antigen or antibody-hapten complexes have appeared in the literature. In addition, some of them have been used in predictive studies on antibody-ligand interactions to provide structural insights where adequate experimental information is missing. The AutoDock program is presented as example of a method for flexibly docking ligands to antibodies. Applying parameters of the second-generation AMBER force field, three antibody-hapten complexes (AN02, DB3, NC6.8) are used as new test cases to analyze the ability of the method to reproduce experimental findings. The X-ray structures could be reconstituted and the corresponding solutions were ranked with best energy score in all cases. Docking to the free instead of the complexed NC6.8 structure indicated the limits of the rigid protein treatment, although fairly good guesses about the location of the binding site and the contact residues could still be obtained if conformational flexibility was allowed at least in the ligand.     

Energetic contributions of amino acid residues and its cross-talk to delineate ligand-binding mechanism

Receptor-based QSAR approaches can enumerate the energetic contributions of amino acid residues toward ligand binding only when experimental binding affinity is associated. The structural data of protein-ligand complexes are witnessing a tremendous growth in the Protein Data Bank deposited with a few entries on binding affinity. We present here a new approach to compute the E nergetic CONT ributions of A mino acid residues and its possible C ross-T alk (ECONTACT) to study ligand binding using per-residue energy decomposition, molecular dynamics simulations and rescoring method without the need for experimental binding affinity. This approach recognizes potential cross-talks among amino acid residues imparting a nonadditive effect to the binding affinity with evidence of correlative motions in the dynamics simulations. The protein-ligand interaction energies deduced from multiple structures are decomposed into per-residue energy terms, which are employed as variables to principal component analysis and generated cross-terms. Out of 16 cross-talks derived from eight datasets of protein-ligand systems, the ECONTACT approach is able to associate 10 potential cross-talks with site-directed mutagenesis, free energy, and dynamics simulations data strongly. We modeled these key determinants of ligand binding using joint probability density function (jPDF) to identify cross-talks in protein structures. The top two cross-talks identified by ECONTACT approach corroborated with the experimental findings. Furthermore, virtual screening exercise using ECONTACT models better discriminated known inhibitors from decoy molecules. This approach proposes the jPDF metric to estimate the probability of observing cross-talks in any protein-ligand complex. The source code and related resources to perform ECONTACT modeling is available freely at https://www.gujaratuniversity.ac.in/econtact /.     

Efficacy and selectivity in flexible database docking

Flexible database docking with DOCK 4.0 has been evaluated for its ability to retrieve biologically active molecules from a database of approximately 1,000 compounds with known activities against thrombin and the progesterone receptor. The retrieval of known actives and chemically similar but inactive molecules was monitored as a function of conformational and orientational sampling. The largest enrichment of actives among the 10% highest ranking molecules is obtained when only five conformations are used to seed the next round of ligand reconstruction and limited sampling is applied to place the base fragment in the binding site. The performance of energy and chemical scoring, as implemented in DOCK 4.0, was found to depend on the protein used for docking. For the progesterone receptor, energy scoring yields the largest enrichments (64%) in terms of actives retrieved among the 10% top scoring molecules, while chemical scoring performs best for thrombin (94%). With the exception of the application of energy scoring to the progesterone receptor, both energy-based scoring schemes applied in this study do not discriminate well between true actives and chemically similar but inactive compounds. In conclusion, flexible docking is able to effectively prioritize high-throughput screening databases, using less conformational sampling than normally required for appropriate reconstruction of protein-ligand complexes. The more subtle discrimination between chemically similar classes of active and inactive compounds remains, however, problematic.     

Scoring a diverse set of high-quality docked conformations: a metascore based on electrostatic and desolvation interactions

Predicting protein-protein interactions involves sampling and scoring docked conformations. Barring some large structural rearrangement, rapidly sampling the space of docked conformations is now a real possibility, and the limiting step for the successful prediction of protein interactions is the scoring function used to reduce the space of conformations from billions to a few, and eventually one high affinity complex. An atomic level free-energy scoring function that estimates in units of kcal/mol both electrostatic and desolvation interactions (plus van der Waals if appropriate) of protein-protein docked conformations is used to rerank the blind predictions (860 in total) submitted for six targets to the community-wide Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions (CAPRI; http://capri.ebi.ac.uk). We found that native-like models often have varying intermolecular contacts and atom clashes, making unlikely that one can construct a universal function that would rank all these models as native-like. Nevertheless, our scoring function is able to consistently identify the native-like complexes as those with the lowest free energy for the individual models of 16 (out of 17) human predictors for five of the targets, while at the same time the modelers failed to do so in more than half of the cases. The scoring of high-quality models developed by a wide variety of methods and force fields confirms that electrostatic and desolvation forces are the dominant interactions determining the bound structure. The CAPRI experiment has shown that modelers can predict valuable models of protein-protein complexes, and improvements in scoring functions should soon solve the docking problem for complexes whose backbones do not change much upon binding. A scoring server and programs are available at http://structure.pitt.edu.