Double-pedicle transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for unilateral breast and chest-wall reconstruction

Fifteen patients underwent unilateral breast and chest-wall reconstruction by a double-pedicle transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap technique. Criteria for using both pedicles include (1) exceptionally large soft-tissue requirements, (2) prior abdominal operations compromising the vasculature to portions of the anterior abdominal wall, and (3) certain higher-risk patients with suspected microvascular pathology. Double pedicles allowed the transfer of the skin island as one unit or as two independent hemiellipses of tissue. Follow-up time ranges from 4 to 17 months. Complications included partial tissue loss in two patients, one abdominal flap seroma, and one patient with a hernia.     

Refinements in transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: projection and contour improvements

A surgical procedure with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap for breast reconstruction is presented using parameters from the opposite normal breast to achieve a better cone shape in the new breast to project the nipple-areola complex. This cone projection is obtained through a vertical plication of both skin/fat halves of the TRAM flap and with two supraumbilical fat flaps to avoid cone collapse. The infraclavicular and axillary regions are filled with a de-epithelialized "fish-fin" cutaneous-fat or fat-only flap, which is placed as a lateral TRAM extension. The de-epithelialized lateral extremity of the TRAM flap folded over itself gives a mound shape to the lateral aspect of the new breast, and the inverted umbilical stalk attached to the TRAM flap imitates a nipple. This procedure is based on six breast reconstructions with a 2-year follow-up. The procedure is a simple, safe, and versatile way to mimic the opposite breast. It is mostly indicated for thin patients who have small to moderate breasts without ptosis or hypertrophy who refuse breast implants or request a mastopexy or reduction mammaplasty on the opposite normal breast during the same procedure.     

The extended vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction

The extended vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap has been used in 34 patients for breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy. This flap can reconstruct a large ptotic breast mound and fill the infraclavicular and axillary areas. The operative technique and a discussion of the method are presented. There are several advantages to the extended vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. First, the main advantage of this flap is its reliable vascular supply, which can reach to the infraclavicular and axillary areas. Second, the large volume of this flap can reconstruct the large ptotic breast, fill the infraclavicular hollow, and create an axillary fold. Third, no lower abdominal wall hernias have developed, and use of alloplastic abdominal wall reinforcement is not necessary. Finally, the simultaneous beneficial effect of horizontal abdominoplasty, which further enhances the patient's body image by narrowing the waist, is unique to this vertical abdominal flap. The disadvantages of this flap include (1) the midline abdominal scar, (2) an umbilical scar on the reconstructed breast, and (3) in principle, inappropriateness for the patient who desires pregnancy postoperatively.     

Breast reconstruction with contralateral rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap

A transverse myocutaneous rectus abdominis flap from the contralateral side has been employed for breast reconstruction in 52 patients. This flap has the advantage of balancing the patient by utilizing skin from an area of relative excess. The blood supply to the flap is based on the superior epigastric vessel and its perforators. The scar of the donor area is acceptable because it falls in the submammary sulcus. The use of a silicone implant can be avoided in some patients because of the adequate bulk of skin, muscle, and fat that is available. Abdominoplasty of the superior abdomen can be obtained during the same operation and can enhance the overall aesthetic results. Breast reconstruction is now possible with either ipsilateral or contralateral upper-abdominal transfer flaps, and further refinement of operative technique using the contralateral upper-rectus abdominis myocutaneous island flap must await further experience.     

Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis

This study compared the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap in postmastectomy reconstruction using a cost-effectiveness analysis. A decision analytic model was used. Medical costs associated with the two techniques were estimated from the Ontario Ministry of Health Schedule of Benefits for 2002. Hospital costs were obtained from St. Joseph's Healthcare, a university teaching hospital in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The utilities of clinically important health states related to breast reconstruction were obtained from 32 "experts" across Canada and converted into quality-adjusted life years. The probabilities of these various clinically important health states being associated with the DIEP and free TRAM flaps were obtained after a thorough review of the literature. The DIEP flap was more costly than the free TRAM flap ($7026.47 versus $6508.29), but it provided more quality-adjusted life years than the free TRAM flap (28.88 years versus 28.53 years). The baseline incremental cost-utility ratio was $1464.30 per quality-adjusted life year, favoring adoption of the DIEP flap. Sensitivity analyses were performed by assuming that the probabilities of occurrence of hernia, abdominal bulging, total flap loss, operating room time, and hospital stay were identical with the DIEP and free TRAM techniques. By assuming that the probability of postoperative hernia for the DIEP flap increased from 0.008 to 0.054 (same as for TRAM flap), the incremental cost-utility ratio changed to $1435.00 per quality-adjusted life year. A sensitivity analysis was performed for the complication of hernia because the DIEP flap allegedly diminishes this complication. Increasing the probability of abdominal bulge from 0.041 to 0.103 for the DIEP flap changed the ratio to $2731.78 per quality-adjusted life year. When the probability of total flap failure was increased from 0.014 to 0.016, the ratio changed to $1384.01 per quality-adjusted life year. When the time in the operating room was assumed to be the same for both flaps, the ratio changed to $4026.57 per quality-adjusted life year. If the hospital stay was assumed to be the same for both flaps, the ratio changed to $1944.30 per quality-adjusted life year. On the basis of the baseline calculation and sensitivity analyses, the DIEP flap remained a cost-effective procedure. Thus, adoption of this new technique for postmastectomy reconstruction is warranted in the Canadian health care system.     

Extended transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap

Blood circulation within the conventional TRAM flap is not generous, and the contralateral random portion of the flap may result in fat or skin necrosis. However, this random portion can be extended safely and used for reconstruction by including the superficial epigastric vessels and the superficial circumflex iliac vessels and by anastomosing either of these to the recipient vessels. We have experienced this extended TRAM flap in two patients without any complications.     

Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps

A series of 310 breasts reconstructed by a single surgeon using free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps was reviewed to see if there were any differences in the incidence of fat necrosis and/or partial flap loss between the two techniques. During the study period, 279 breasts were reconstructed with free TRAM flaps and 31 breasts were reconstructed with DIEP flaps. In the breasts reconstructed with free TRAM flaps, the incidence of partial flap loss was 2.2 percent and the incidence of fat necrosis was 12.9 percent. The DIEP flaps were divided into two groups. For the first eight flaps, patients were selected using the same criteria normally used to choose patients for free TRAM flaps. In this unselected early group, the incidence of partial flap loss was 37.5 percent and the incidence of fat necrosis was 62.5 percent. Because of the high incidence of partial flap loss and fat necrosis in the first eight flaps, subsequent selection was modified to limit the use of DIEP flaps to patients who had at least one sufficiently large perforator in each flap (a palpable pulse and a vein at least 1 mm in diameter) and who did not require more than 70 percent of the flap to create a breast of adequate size. In this later (selected) group, fat necrosis (17.4 percent) and partial flap loss (8.7 percent) were reduced to a level only moderately higher than that found in the free TRAM flap group. From these data, it can be concluded that the incidence of partial flap loss and fat necrosis is higher in DIEP flaps than in free TRAM flaps, probably because the blood flow to the former flap is less robust. This difficulty can be circumvented to some extent, however, by careful patient selection. Factors that should be considered include tobacco use, size of the perforators (especially the vein), and (in unilateral reconstructions) the amount of flap tissue across the midline needed to create an adequately sized breast. If these factors are properly considered when planning the operation, fat necrosis and partial flap loss can be reduced to an acceptable level. For selected patients, the DIEP flap is an excellent technique that can obtain a successful, autologous tissue breast reconstruction with minimal donor-site morbidity. For patients who are not good candidates for reconstruction with this flap, the free TRAM flap remains a good alternative.     

Immediate reconstruction of the penis using an inferiorly based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap

A new method for reconstruction of the penis using an inferiorly based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap is described that seems to be particularly suitable for immediate one-stage reconstruction. Function of the residual portion of rectus muscle is preserved, and the abdominal wall is not significantly weakened.     

The inferiorly based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of recurrent pressure sores.

Eight neurologically impaired patients underwent reconstruction of chronic perineal and ischial pressure sores utilizing an inferiorly based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Other local and regional flap options had been previously used or were not feasible. In six patients, healing was uncomplicated. One patient required local debridement and flap readvancement. The second involved minor separation of a suture line and healed by secondary intention. All donor sites were closed directly and healed by primary intention. There was no evidence of hernia formation, and no functional deficit was detected from removal of the rectus muscle in any of the patients. In conclusion, it was felt that the inferiorly based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap should be considered a reconstructive option in dealing with perineal and ischial pressure sores. Furthermore, for reasons discussed, we found distinct advantages to using this flap in spinal cord injury patients.