Predicting Pathological Features at Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score in predicting pathologic features in a cohort of patients eligible for active surveillance who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Methods

A total of 223 patients who fulfilled the criteria for “Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance”, were included. Mp–1.5 Tesla MRI examination staging with endorectal coil was performed at least 6–8 weeks after TRUS-guided biopsy. In all patients, the likelihood of the presence of cancer was assigned using PIRADS score between 1 and 5. Outcomes of interest were: Gleason score upgrading, extra capsular extension (ECE), unfavorable prognosis (occurrence of both upgrading and ECE), large tumor volume (≥0.5ml), and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and Decision Curve Analyses (DCA) were performed for models with and without inclusion of PIRADS score.

Results

Multivariate analysis demonstrated the association of PIRADS score with upgrading (P<0.0001), ECE (P<0.0001), unfavorable prognosis (P<0.0001), and large tumor volume (P = 0.002). ROC curves and DCA showed that models including PIRADS score resulted in greater net benefit for almost all the outcomes of interest, with the only exception of SVI.

Conclusions

mpMRI and PIRADS scoring are feasible tools in clinical setting and could be used as decision-support systems for a more accurate selection of patients eligible for AS.     

The Use of Exome Genotyping to Predict Pathological Gleason Score Upgrade after Radical Prostatectomy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients

Background

Active surveillance (AS) is a promising option for patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), however current criteria could not select the patients correctly, many patients who fulfilled recent AS criteria experienced pathological Gleason score upgrade (PGU) after radical prostatectomy (RP). In this study, we aimed to develop an accurate model for predicting PGU among low-risk PCa patients by using exome genotyping.

Methods

We genotyped 242,221 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)s on a custom HumanExome BeadChip v1.0 (Illuminam Inc.) in blood DNA from 257 low risk PCa patients (PSA <10 ng/ml, biopsy Gleason score (GS) ≤6 and clinical stage ≤T2a) who underwent radical prostatectomy. Genetic data were analyzed using an unconditional logistic regression to calculate an odds ratio as an estimate of relative risk of PGU, which defined pathologic GS above 7. Among them, we selected persistent SNPs after multiple testing using FDR method, and we compared accuracies from the multivariate logistic model incorporating clinical factors between included and excluded selected SNP information.

Results

After analysis of exome genotyping, 15 SNPs were significant to predict PGU in low risk PCa patients. Among them, one SNP – rs33999879 remained significant after multiple testing. When a multivariate model incorporating factors in Epstein definition – PSA density, biopsy GS, positive core number, tumor per core ratio and age was devised for the prediction of PGU, the predictive accuracy of the multivariate model was 78.4% (95%CI: 0.726–0.834). By addition the factor of rs33999879 in aforementioned multivariate model, the predictive accuracy was 82.9%, which was significantly increased (p = 0.0196).

Conclusion

The rs33999879 SNP is a predictor for PGU. The addition of genetic information from the exome sequencing effectively enhanced the predictive accuracy of the multivariate model to establish suitable active surveillance criteria.     

Prostate Stem Cell Antigen Expression in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Predicts Early Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with High Risk Prostate Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy

We aimed to identify tissue biomarkers that predict early biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PC), toward the goal of increasing the benefits of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT). In 2005–2012, prostatectomy specimens were collected from 134 PC patients who had received NHT and radical prostatectomy. The expression of 13 tissue biomarkers was assessed in the specimens via immunohistochemistry. Time to BCR and factors predictive of BCR were determined by using the Cox proportional hazards model. During the follow-up period (median, 57.5 months), 67 (50.0%) patients experienced BCR. Four (3.0%) patients were tumor-free in the final pathology assessment, and 101 (75.4%) had negative resection margins. Prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) was the only significant prognostic tissue biomarker of BCR [hazard ratio (HR), 2.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06–6.27; p = 0.037] in a multivariable analysis adjusted by the clinicopathological variables that also significantly predicted BCR; these were seminal vesicle invasion (HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.32–4.34), initial prostate serum antigen level (HR 1.01; 95% CI, 1.001–1.020), prostate size (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90–0.97), and the Gleason score of preoperative biopsies (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01–1.79). We suggest that PSCA is a useful tissue marker for predicting BCR in patients with high risk PC receiving NHT and radical prostatectomy.     

根治性前列腺切除术后大体病理较术前穿刺病理升级的危险因素分析

目的:前列腺穿刺病理Gleason评分(GS)和根治性前列腺切除术后病理Gleason评分经常出现差异.本文主要研究肿瘤病理升级的可能影响因素.方法:选择1999-01至2007-11在本院行前列腺穿刺活检确诊并行根治性前列腺切除术的95例前列腺癌患者,考察的临床资料包括患者确诊时的年龄,前列腺特异性抗原水平(PSA),前列腺体积(PV),前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD),术前是否接受新辅助内分泌治疗(NHT),穿刺病理GS,手术后病理GS及肿瘤体积(TIV).使用t-检验或卡方检验比较不用组别之间的变量,分别使用单因素和多因素Logistical回归分析引起GS升级的相关因素.结果:患者的平均年龄是67岁,平均PSA水平为24.3 ng/ml,平均前列腺体积是33.1ml.将前列腺体积分为≤25ml(25例),25-50ml(59例),≥50ml(11例)三组,将穿刺病理GS分为4-5(13例),6(35例),7(32例),8-10(15例)四组.前列腺体积较大组(≥50m1)比体积较小组(≤25ml,25-50m1)的肿瘤升级比率明显较低(48% vs 24%,18%,p＜0.05).穿刺病理GS较高组(8-10)比较低组(4-5,6,7)的肿瘤升级比率明显减低(46% vs 34%,25%,13%,p＜0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析显示,PV、穿刺GS及内分泌治疗与病理升级呈负相关(p＜0.05),而肿瘤体积及PSAD与其呈正相关(p＜0.05).结论:较大的前列腺体积,较高的穿刺病理GS,接受内分泌治疗以及较低的PSAD均可降低其肿瘤升级的可能.泌尿外科医师在决定由穿刺活检确诊的前列腺癌患者的治疗方案时应想到上述结论.     

前列腺癌根治术治疗不同分级前列腺癌患者的临床研究

目的:探究前列腺癌根治术在不同危险度前列腺癌患者中治疗的临床效果,为临床前列腺癌患者的治疗提供依据。方法:选择2008年1月~2015年12月期间我院94例前列腺癌患者为研究对象,根据D'Amico评分将其分为高危、中危及低危三组,收集患者基线资料、术后随访资料,并比较三组手术并发症;采用Kaplan-Meier分析法计算三组患者生存率,并采用Log-rank检验比较不同危险组的生存率。结果:高危组患者进行开放性手术人数多于中危组和低危组,且中危组多于低危组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);高危组患者术前Gleason评分和PAS水平高于中危组和低危组,且中危组高于低危组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);术后5年高危组患者完全控尿率显著低于中危组和低危组(P0.05);三组患者间5年无生化复发率比较无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:前列腺癌根治术治疗高危前列腺患者较中、低危患者疗效较差,但仍可达到较好的疗效,可在临床推广使用。     

Discovery and Validation of a Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier that Predicts Early Metastasis Following Radical Prostatectomy

Purpose

Clinicopathologic features and biochemical recurrence are sensitive, but not specific, predictors of metastatic disease and lethal prostate cancer. We hypothesize that a genomic expression signature detected in the primary tumor represents true biological potential of aggressive disease and provides improved prediction of early prostate cancer metastasis.

Methods

A nested case-control design was used to select 639 patients from the Mayo Clinic tumor registry who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 2001. A genomic classifier (GC) was developed by modeling differential RNA expression using 1.4 million feature high-density expression arrays of men enriched for rising PSA after prostatectomy, including 213 who experienced early clinical metastasis after biochemical recurrence. A training set was used to develop a random forest classifier of 22 markers to predict for cases - men with early clinical metastasis after rising PSA. Performance of GC was compared to prognostic factors such as Gleason score and previous gene expression signatures in a withheld validation set.

Results

Expression profiles were generated from 545 unique patient samples, with median follow-up of 16.9 years. GC achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (0.67–0.83) in validation, outperforming clinical variables and gene signatures. GC was the only significant prognostic factor in multivariable analyses. Within Gleason score groups, cases with high GC scores experienced earlier death from prostate cancer and reduced overall survival. The markers in the classifier were found to be associated with a number of key biological processes in prostate cancer metastatic disease progression.

Conclusion

A genomic classifier was developed and validated in a large patient cohort enriched with prostate cancer metastasis patients and a rising PSA that went on to experience metastatic disease. This early metastasis prediction model based on genomic expression in the primary tumor may be useful for identification of aggressive prostate cancer.     

Epidural Analgesia during Open Radical Prostatectomy Does Not Improve Long-Term Cancer-Related Outcome: A Retrospective Study in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer

Background

A beneficial effect of regional anesthesia on cancer related outcome in various solid tumors has been proposed. The data on prostate cancer is conflicting and reports on long-term cancer specific survival are lacking.

Methods

In a retrospective, single-center study, outcomes of 148 consecutive patients with locally advanced prostate cancer pT3/4 who underwent retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) with general anesthesia combined with intra- and postoperative epidural analgesia (n=67) or with postoperative ketorolac-morphine analgesia (n=81) were reviewed. The median observation time was 14.00 years (range 10.87-17.75 yrs). Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, local and distant recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to analyze clinicopathologic variables associated with disease progression and death.

Results

The survival estimates for BCR-free, local and distant recurrence-free, cancer-specific survival and overall survival did not differ between the two groups (P=0.64, P=0.75, P=0.18, P=0.32 and P=0.07). For both groups, higher preoperative PSA (hazard ratio (HR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.02, P<0.0001), increased specimen Gleason score (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.06-1.46, P=0.007) and positive nodal status (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.03-2.67, P=0.04) were associated with higher risk of BCR. Increased specimen Gleason score predicted death from prostate cancer (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.65-3.68, P<0.0001).

Conclusions

General anaesthesia combined with epidural analgesia did not reduce the risk of cancer progression or improve survival after RRP for prostate cancer in this group of patients at high risk for disease progression with a median observation time of 14.00 yrs.     

Therapeutic Strategies for Localized Prostate Cancer II: Perineal Prostatectomy, X-Rays, Protons, Neutrons, and Combination Brachytherapy

Application of improved imaging, diagnostic, and computer techniques is beginning to have an impact on the management of localized prostate cancer. It is possible to perform a range of surgical and radiation procedures with less morbidity than in the past. The changes in therapy for patients with localized disease derive from better knowledge of anatomy for invasive procedures and optimization of virtual planning for noninvasive methods. Perineal prostatectomy and combinations of beam and seed radiation offer both patient and physician reasonable therapeutic options.     

Preoperative Glycemic Control Status as a Significant Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy

Background

The effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on prostate cancer (PCa) outcome remains controversial. Thus, we investigated the association of DM history, glycemic control, and metformin use with oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods

We reviewed the records of 746 contemporary patients who had hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measured within the 6 months preceding RP. The associations between clinical variables and risk of adverse pathological features and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were tested using a multivariate logistic regression and multiple Cox-proportional hazards model, respectively. BCR was defined as prostatic specific antigen (PSA) > 0.2 ng/mL in 2 consecutive tests.

Results

There were no significant differences in the rates of adverse pathologic features and BCR-free survival between patients with (n = 209) and without (n = 537) a history of DM diagnosis (all p > 0.05). In multivariate analyses, high HbA1c level (≥ 6.5%) was significantly related with high pathologic Gleason score (≥ 4+3; odds ratio [OR] 1.704, p = 0.019) and BCR-free survival (OR 1.853, p = 0.007). Metformin use was not associated with BCR-free survival (OR 0.662, p = 0.125).

Conclusions

Poor glycemic control was significantly associated with BCR after RP. Meanwhile, metformin use was not associated with biochemical outcome after RP. Further investigation would be needed to identify exact mechanism underlying the impact of glycemic control on PCa treatment outcome.     

腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗前列腺癌的疗效及对患者血清激素水平的影响

目的:分析腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗前列腺癌的疗效及其对患者血清激素水平的影响。方法:选择86例前列腺癌患者为研究对象并按抽签法随机分为对照组与观察组,每组43例。对照组行开放前列腺癌根治术治疗,观察组采用腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术,比较两组手术指标,手术前后血清促卵泡激素(FSH)、黄体生成素(LH)、双氢睾酮(DHT)、游离睾酮(FT)、总睾酮(T)、前列腺特异性抗原(T-PSA、F-PSA),CD3~+、CD4~+、CD8~+、CD4~+/CD8~+水平的变化及术后并发症的发生情况。结果:观察组手术时间明显长于对照组,失血量、肠功能恢复时间、住院时间、疼痛评分均明显低于或短于对照组(P0.05)。两组治疗前后血清FSH、LH、DHT、FT、T、T-PSA、F-PSA比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组CD3~+、CD4~+、CD4~+/CD8~+显著高于对照组(P0.05),CD8~+低于对照组(P0.05)。观察组术后并发症的发生率明显低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术可起到与开放手术相似的控瘤效果,提高血清雄激素水平和患者的免疫功能,控制肿瘤进展,且安全性更高。     

The Case for Hypofractionation of Localized Prostate Cancer

An optimal treatment regimen for localized prostate cancer (PCa) is yet to be determined. Increasing evidence reveals a lower α/β ratio for PCa with hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) regimens introduced to exploit this change in therapeutic ratio. HFRT also results in shortened overall treatment times of 4 to 5 weeks, thus reducing staffing and machine burden, and, more importantly, patient stress. This review evaluates pretreatment characteristics, outcomes, and toxicity for 15 HFRT studies on localized PCa. HFRT results in comparable or better biochemical relapse-free survival and toxicity and is a viable option for localized PCa.Key words: Localized prostate cancer, Hypofractionation, Short-course radiotherapy, Dose escalation, Biologic equivalenceMultiple randomized dose-escalation trials for localized prostate cancer (PCa) have shown improved biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rates for higher total doses using conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT), though at a cost of longer treatment duration.^1–4 The increased treatment time requires increased access to radiation treatment facilities, with additional burden on both patients and staff. To address the issue of prolonged treatment duration while maintaining equivalent bRFS, an increasing number of studies have pursued the role of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) with higher daily doses delivered in a shorter total amount of time. This treatment paradigm assumes a low α/β ratio for PCa, as demonstrated in several recent studies, with higher α/β ratios for normal surrounding tissues.^5–7 By employing HFRT, the increased daily radiation doses exploit the aforementioned α/β ratios by allowing equivalent tumor kill as with CFRT, while also allowing for normal tissue repair.With longer-term and randomized HFRT data now reported in the literature, it seems appropriate to address whether the time has come to make HFRT the new standard. This article seeks to review the current literature and the role of HFRT in the modern era of radiotherapy for localized PCa.     

Widespread and Functional RNA Circularization in Localized Prostate Cancer

1. Download high-res image (265KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Association between Seminal Vesicle Invasion and Prostate Cancer Detection Location after Transrectal Systemic Biopsy among Men Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy

Background

Our hypothesis is that the location of the seminal vesicles near the base of the prostate, the more positive cores are detected in the base, the greater the risk of seminal vesicle invasion. Therefore we investigate the clinical outcomes of base dominant prostate cancer (BDPC) in transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) -guided biopsies compared with anteromiddle dominant prostate cancer (AMPC).

Methods

From November 2003 to June 2014, a total of 990 intermediate and high risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) were enrolled and stratified into two groups according to proportion of positive cores–BDPC group had ≥ 33.3% ratio of positive cores from the prostate base among all positive cores and AMPC group < 33.3% in systemic biopsy. Between two groups, we compared the rate of pathologic outcomes and biochemical recurrence (BCR). We performed multivariate logistic regression model to confirm the significance of BDPC to seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and Cox proportional hazard analysis to BCR.

Results

Among these 990 PCa patients, the 487 patients in BDPC group had more advanced clinical stage (p<0.001), a higher biopsy GS (p = 0.002), and a higher rate of extracapsular extension (ECE), SVI and BCR (all p<0.001) than AMPC group. The patients in BDPC group had poor BCR free survival rate via Kaplan-meier analysis (p<0.001). The ratio of the base positive cores was a significant predictor to SVI in multivariate analysis (p < 0.001) and significant predictor of BCR in multivariate Cox proportional analysis (hazard ratio: 1.466, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

BDPC in TRUS-guided prostate biopsies was significantly associated with SVI and BCR after adjusting for other clinical factors. Therefore, BDPC should be considered to be a more aggressive tumor despite an otherwise similar cancer profile.     

Radiation Therapy after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Complications and Influence of Radiation Timing on Outcomes in a Large,Population-Based Cohort

PurposeTo evaluate the influence of timing of salvage and adjuvant radiation therapy on outcomes after prostatectomy for prostate cancer.MethodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database, we identified prostate cancer patients diagnosed during 1995–2007 who had one or more adverse pathological features after prostatectomy. The final cohort of 6,137 eligible patients included men who received prostatectomy alone (n = 4,509) or with adjuvant (n = 894) or salvage (n = 734) radiation therapy. Primary outcomes were genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and erectile dysfunction events and survival after treatment(s).ResultsRadiation therapy after prostatectomy was associated with higher rates of gastrointestinal and genitourinary events, but not erectile dysfunction. In adjusted models, earlier treatment with adjuvant radiation therapy was not associated with increased rates of genitourinary or erectile dysfunction events compared to delayed salvage radiation therapy. Early adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with lower rates of gastrointestinal events that salvage radiation therapy, with hazard ratios of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.67–0.95) for procedure-defined and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59, 0.83) for diagnosis-defined events. There was no significant difference between ART and non-ART groups (SRT or RP alone) for overall survival (HR = 1.13 95% CI = (0.96, 1.34) p = 0.148).ConclusionsRadiation therapy after prostatectomy is associated with increased rates of gastrointestinal and genitourinary events. However, earlier radiation therapy is not associated with higher rates of gastrointestinal, genitourinary or sexual events. These findings oppose the conventional belief that delaying radiation therapy reduces the risk of radiation-related complications.     

Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Localized and Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis to determine the predictive value of NLR for overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and clinical features in patients with PCa. We systematically searched PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Embase for relevant studies published up to October 2015.ResultsA total of 9418 patients from 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Elevated pretreatment NLR predicted poor OS (HR 1.628, 95% CI 1.410–1.879) and RFS (HR 1.357, 95% CI 1.126–1.636) in all patients with PCa. However, NLR was insignificantly associated with OS in the subgroup of patients with localized PCa (HR 1.439, 95% CI 0.753–2.75). Increased NLR was also significantly correlated with lymph node involvement (OR 1.616, 95% CI 1.167–2.239) but not with pathological stage (OR 0.827, 95% CI 0.637–1.074) or Gleason score (OR 0.761, 95% CI 0.555–1.044).ConclusionsThe present meta-analysis indicated that NLR could predict the prognosis for patients with locally advanced or castration-resistant PCa. Patients with higher NLR are more likely to have poorer prognosis than those with lower NLR.     

Radical Prostatectomy versus External Beam Radiotherapy for cT1-4N0M0 Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Patient Outcomes Including Mortality

Background

Although radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) have been considered as comparable treatments for localized prostate cancer (PC), it is controversial which treatment is better. The present study aimed to compare outcomes, including mortality, of RP and EBRT for localized PC.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 891 patients with cT1-4N0M0 PC who underwent either RP (n = 569) or EBRT (n = 322) with curative intent at our single institution between 2005 and 2012. Of the EBRT patients, 302 (93.8%) underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Related to these, other-cause mortality (OCM) was also calculated. Biochemical recurrence-free survival was assessed as a secondary endpoint. Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.

Results

Median follow-up durations were 53 and 45 months, and median ages were 66 and 70 years (P <0.0001), in the RP and EBRT groups, respectively. As a whole, significantly better prognoses of the RP group than the EBRT group were observed for both OS and CSS, although OCM was significantly higher in the EBRT group. There was no death from PC in men with low and intermediate D’Amico risks, except one with intermediate-risk in the EBRT group. In high-risk patients, significantly more patients died from PC in the EBRT group than the RP group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the RP group to be an independent prognostic factor for better CSS. On the other hand, the EBRT group had a significantly longer biochemical recurrence-free survival than the RP group.

Conclusions

Mortality outcomes of both RP and EBRT were generally favorable in low and intermediate risk patients. Improvement of CSS in high risk patients was seen in patients receiving RP over those receiving EBRT.     

Co-Occurring Gland Angularity in Localized Subgraphs: Predicting Biochemical Recurrence in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients

Quantitative histomorphometry (QH) refers to the application of advanced computational image analysis to reproducibly describe disease appearance on digitized histopathology images. QH thus could serve as an important complementary tool for pathologists in interrogating and interpreting cancer morphology and malignancy. In the US, annually, over 60,000 prostate cancer patients undergo radical prostatectomy treatment. Around 10,000 of these men experience biochemical recurrence within 5 years of surgery, a marker for local or distant disease recurrence. The ability to predict the risk of biochemical recurrence soon after surgery could allow for adjuvant therapies to be prescribed as necessary to improve long term treatment outcomes. The underlying hypothesis with our approach, co-occurring gland angularity (CGA), is that in benign or less aggressive prostate cancer, gland orientations within local neighborhoods are similar to each other but are more chaotically arranged in aggressive disease. By modeling the extent of the disorder, we can differentiate surgically removed prostate tissue sections from (a) benign and malignant regions and (b) more and less aggressive prostate cancer. For a cohort of 40 intermediate-risk (mostly Gleason sum 7) surgically cured prostate cancer patients where half suffered biochemical recurrence, the CGA features were able to predict biochemical recurrence with 73% accuracy. Additionally, for 80 regions of interest chosen from the 40 studies, corresponding to both normal and cancerous cases, the CGA features yielded a 99% accuracy. CGAs were shown to be statistically signicantly () better at predicting BCR compared to state-of-the-art QH methods and postoperative prostate cancer nomograms.     

Short-Term Soy Isoflavone Intervention in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer: A Randomized,Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Trial

Purpose

We describe the effects of soy isoflavone consumption on prostate specific antigen (PSA), hormone levels, total cholesterol, and apoptosis in men with localized prostate cancer.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We conducted a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to examine the effect of soy isoflavone capsules (80 mg/d of total isoflavones, 51 mg/d aglucon units) on serum and tissue biomarkers in patients with localized prostate cancer. Eighty-six men were randomized to treatment with isoflavones (n = 42) or placebo (n = 44) for up to six weeks prior to scheduled prostatectomy. We performed microarray analysis using a targeted cell cycle regulation and apoptosis gene chip (GEArrayTM). Changes in serum total testosterone, free testosterone, total estrogen, estradiol, PSA, and total cholesterol were analyzed at baseline, mid-point, and at the time of radical prostatectomy. In this preliminary analysis, 12 genes involved in cell cycle control and 9 genes involved in apoptosis were down-regulated in the treatment tumor tissues versus the placebo control. Changes in serum total testosterone, free testosterone, total estrogen, estradiol, PSA, and total cholesterol in the isoflavone-treated group compared to men receiving placebo were not statistically significant.

Conclusions/Significance

These data suggest that short-term intake of soy isoflavones did not affect serum hormone levels, total cholesterol, or PSA.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00255125","term_id":"NCT00255125"}}NCT00255125     

PSA密度对前列腺癌病理结果的预测价值

目的:评估前列腺特异抗原密度(prostate specific antigen density,PASD)对前列腺癌根治术后不良病理结果的预测价值.方法:回顾性分析50例病理确诊为前列腺癌患者的临床资料,收集患者术前总前列腺特异抗原(total prostate specific antigen,tPSA)、PSAD及穿刺活检Gleason评分结果,比较在手术切缘阳性(positive surgical margins,PSM)、前列腺包膜外侵犯(extracapsular prostatic extension,EPE)、精囊入侵(seminal vesicle invasion,SVI)患者中以上各项指标的差异,对有统计学差异的因素行多元Logistic回归分析,筛选影响浸润的最主要因素,同时运用工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)比较各指标的预测价值.结果:PSM,EPE和SVI患者之间PSAD存在统计学差异,PSAD曲线下面积高于PSA与Gleason评分.多元Logistic回归分析结果表明,PSAD和Gleason评分对PSM和EPE有着统计学意义的预测价值,且PSAD和PSA与SVI有关.结论:PSAD可作为接受前列腺癌根治术的患者术后不良的预测指标.     

Proton Beam Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer 101: Basics,Controversies, and Facts

Proton beam therapy for prostate cancer has become a source of controversy in the urologic community, and the rapid dissemination and marketing of this technology has led to many patients inquiring about this therapy. Yet the complexity of the technology, the cost, and the conflicting messages in the literature have left many urologists ill equipped to counsel their patients regarding this option. This article reviews the basic science of the proton beam, examines the reasons for both the hype and the controversy surrounding this therapy, and, most importantly, examines the literature so that every urologist is able to comfortably discuss this option with inquiring patients.Key words: Prostate cancer, Proton beam therapy, External beam radiation therapy, Intensity modulated radiation therapyProton beam therapy (PBT) has become a source of controversy in the urologic community. It is not uncommon to hear mixed messages regarding the issue, from zealous advocates to cost-conscious skeptics, leaving many urologists unsure what to tell their patients with prostate cancer. What is clear, however, is that the technology is disseminating across the nation, and as our patients turn to the internet to learn more about their diagnosis, they are going to encounter increasingly more information about PBT, both scientific and promotional in nature. Hence, it is necessary for every urologist to understand the basics of PBT to help guide our patients through treatment options. This article reviews and compares the basic science of conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with PBT, examines the reasons for both the hype and the controversy surrounding this therapy, and, most importantly, examines the literature so that all urologists are adequately equipped to counsel their patients on this subject.