Different influences of DNA purity indices and quantity on PCR-based DGGE and functional gene microarray in soil microbial community study

Based on the comparative study of the DNA extracts from two soil samples obtained by three commercial DNA extraction kits, we evaluated the influence of the DNA quantity and purity indices (the absorbance ratios A260/280 and A260/230, as well as the absorbance value A320 indicating the amount of humic substances) on polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and a functional gene microarray used in the study of microbial communities. Numbers and intensities of the DGGE bands are more affected by the A260/280 and A320 values than by the ratio A260/230 and conditionally affected by the DNA yield. Moreover, we demonstrated that the DGGE band pattern was also affected by the preferential extraction due to chemical agents applied in the extraction. Unlike DGGE, microarray is more affected by the A260/230 and A320 values. Until now, the successful PCR performance is the mostly used criterion for soil DNA purity. However, since PCR was more influenced by the A260/280 ratio than by A260/230, it is not accurate enough any more for microbial community assessed by non-PCR-based methods such as microarray. This study provides some useful hints on how to choose effective DNA extraction method for the subsequent assessment of microbial community.     

松突圆蚧基因组DNA提取方法的比较

分别采用醋酸钾(KAc)法、十二烷基硫酸钠-蛋白酶K(SDS-PK)消化法、十六烷基三乙基溴化铵(CTAB)法及DNA提取试剂盒(吸附柱型)对单只松突圆蚧的基因组DNA进行提取。同时针对盾蚧科昆虫的特点,在提取前利用氯仿和解剖针去除样品表面的介壳。结果表明,用同种提取方法提取的经氯仿处理与未经处理样本的提取效果无明显差异,而采用解剖针去除介壳的样本提取效果较好。所采用的4种提取方法均能从新鲜标本中提取出DNA,其中CTAB法提取的DNA量较多,而SDS-PK法提取的DNA质量较好。     

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for multiplex polymerase chain reaction

We compared six DNA extraction methods for obtaining DNA from whole blood and saliva for use in multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. The aim was to evaluate saliva sampling as an alternative to blood sampling to obtain DNA for molecular diagnostics, genetic genealogy, and research purposes. The DNA quantity, DNA purity (A_260/280), PCR inhibition ratio, and mitochondrial DNA/genomic DNA ratio were measured to compare the extraction methods. The different extraction methods resulted in variable DNA quantity and purity, but there were no significant differences in the efficiency of multiplex PCR and oligomicroarray signals after single-base extension on the arrayed primer extension 2 (APEX-2).     

Evaluating genomic DNA extraction methods from human whole blood using endpoint and real-time PCR assays

The extraction of genomic DNA is the crucial first step in large-scale epidemiological studies. Though there are many popular DNA isolation methods from human whole blood, only a few reports have compared their efficiencies using both end-point and real-time PCR assays. Genomic DNA was extracted from coronary artery disease patients using solution-based conventional protocols such as the phenol–chloroform/proteinase-K method and a non-phenolic non-enzymatic Rapid-Method, which were evaluated and compared vis-a-vis a commercially available silica column-based Blood DNA isolation kit. The appropriate method for efficiently extracting relatively pure DNA was assessed based on the total DNA yield, concentration, purity ratios (A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ and A₂₆₀/A₂₃₀), spectral profile and agarose gel electrophoresis analysis. The quality of the isolated DNA was further analysed for PCR inhibition using a murine specific ATP1A3 qPCR assay and mtDNA/Y-chromosome ratio determination assay. The suitability of the extracted DNA for downstream applications such as end-point SNP genotyping, was tested using PCR-RFLP analysis of the AGTR1-1166A>C variant, a mirSNP having pharmacogenetic relevance in cardiovascular diseases. Compared to the traditional phenol–chloroform/proteinase-K method, our results indicated the Rapid-Method to be a more suitable protocol for genomic DNA extraction from human whole blood in terms of DNA quantity, quality, safety, processing time and cost. The Rapid-Method, which is based on a simple salting-out procedure, is not only safe and cost-effective, but also has the added advantage of being scaled up to process variable sample volumes, thus enabling it to be applied in large-scale epidemiological studies.     

海南产桶形芋螺线粒体基因组DNA提取条件的优化

提取海南产桶形芋螺线粒体基因组完整DNA (mtDNA),并对提取条件进行优化。以桶形芋螺腹足肌肉、毒腺和肝胰脏三个不同组织为材料,分别采用改进高盐沉淀法、细胞器/磁珠法和试剂盒提取三种方法,提取桶形芋螺mtDNA,并利用琼脂糖凝胶电泳和紫外分光光度计对提取mtDNA的纯度和浓度进行测定。以coxⅠ-rRNA小亚基基因和α-芋螺毒素基因设计引物,通过PCR反应来确证所提取的DNA确实是mtDNA。试剂盒法提取肝胰脏、高盐沉淀法提取肝胰脏和腹足肌肉组织这三种方法的产率很高,分别为44.4μg/mg、43.3μg/mg和32.6μg/mg。A260/280比值表明,改进高盐沉淀法提取毒腺和腹足肌肉组织,细胞器磁珠法提取腹足肌肉组织的mtDNA纯度很高。综合比较,采用改进高盐沉淀法,利用桶形芋螺腹足肌肉组织所提取的mtDNA产率高、质量好、纯度高。高质量芋螺mtDNA的获取为利用分子生物学方法对芋螺进行遗传进化分析和系统分类提供了基础。     

SDSC-TAB和高盐沉淀法提取香蕉枯萎病菌基因组DNA的比较

以香蕉枯萎病菌菌株为试验材料,采用SDS- CTAB法和高盐沉淀法提纯香蕉枯萎病菌基因组DNA。结果表明:高盐沉淀法是适合于香蕉枯萎病菌基因组DNA提取的方法。该方法提取的DNAOD2 60 2 80值显示产物纯度较高;经琼脂糖凝胶电泳得到一条带型较宽且清晰的DNA谱带,DNA浓度较高,基本无DNA碎带;不用RNase处理,已无RNA的干扰,无需任何纯化处理即可用于PCR扩增和RAPD分析。同时对DNA提取过程中的细节问题进行了探讨与分析。     

1种小麦白粉病菌DNA基因组的微量简捷提取方法

为了寻找适合小麦白粉菌基因组DNA微量提取的方法,分别采用改进破壁法,液氮研磨法和溶菌酶消化法进行破壁,提取专性寄生菌小麦白粉菌DNA。结果表明,用改进的破壁方法,仅用3~10 mg的分生孢子粉所获得DNA的收率为（12.23±3.46）~（40.32±5.67）ng/mg,且OD260/OD280比值为1.71~1.92之间,说明该破壁方法获得的DNA收率大且纯度高。通过PCR反应获得了良好的效果。同时该方法也适用于小麦条锈菌和大麦白粉菌专性寄生菌DNA的提取。     

一种快速、经济提取外周凝血基因组DNA方法的建立

目的：建立一种经济、快速且高质量提取人体外周凝血DNA的方法。方法：摸索最佳的匀浆条件,对外周凝血块进行匀浆,采用Ⅺ法对匀浆液进行基因组DNA的提取,通过凝胶电泳、单重PCR和多重PCR检测凝血基因组DNA的提取产量和质量。并分别与常规的凝血基因组DNA提取方法,即蛋白酶K消化法,以及提取抗凝血基因组DNA的Ⅺ法进行比较分析。结果：最佳的匀浆条件为：39000map,15秒。在此条件下提取的基因组DNA完整性好,纯度和产量与蛋白酶K消化法提取凝血DNA和KI法提取抗凝血DNA的结果相比,没有统计学差异。单重PCR和多重PCR也获得了理想的扩增结果。结论：与常规的外周凝血提取方法相比（蛋白酶K消化法）,本方法节省了时间和成本,能快速、经济、有效地提取外周凝血基因组DNA,可用于后续的科研和临床诊断需要,解决了部分科研机构血液基因组DNA的样本来源问题。     

Comparison of genomic DNA extraction techniques from whole blood samples: a time,cost and quality evaluation study

Genomic DNA obtained from patient whole blood samples is a key element for genomic research. Advantages and disadvantages, in terms of time-efficiency, cost-effectiveness and laboratory requirements, of procedures available to isolate nucleic acids need to be considered before choosing any particular method. These characteristics have not been fully evaluated for some laboratory techniques, such as the salting out method for DNA extraction, which has been excluded from comparison in different studies published to date. We compared three different protocols (a traditional salting out method, a modified salting out method and a commercially available kit method) to determine the most cost-effective and time-efficient method to extract DNA. We extracted genomic DNA from whole blood samples obtained from breast cancer patient volunteers and compared the results of the product obtained in terms of quantity (concentration of DNA extracted and DNA obtained per ml of blood used) and quality (260/280 ratio and polymerase chain reaction product amplification) of the obtained yield. On average, all three methods showed no statistically significant differences between the final result, but when we accounted for time and cost derived for each method, they showed very significant differences. The modified salting out method resulted in a seven- and twofold reduction in cost compared to the commercial kit and traditional salting out method, respectively and reduced time from 3 days to 1 hour compared to the traditional salting out method. This highlights a modified salting out method as a suitable choice to be used in laboratories and research centres, particularly when dealing with a large number of samples.     

Preserving avian blood and DNA sampled in the wild: A survey of personal experiences

Collecting and storing biological material from wild animals in a way that does not deteriorate DNA quality for subsequent analyses is instrumental for research in ecology and evolution. Our aims were to gather reports on the effectiveness of methods commonly used by researchers for the field collection and long‐term storage of blood samples and DNA extracts from wild birds. Personal experiences were collected with an online survey targeted specifically at researchers sampling wild birds. Many researchers experienced problems with blood sample storage but not with DNA extract storage. Storage issues generated problems with obtaining adequate DNA quality and sufficient DNA quantity for the targeted molecular analyses but were not related to season of blood sampling, access to equipment, transporting samples, temperature, and method of blood storage. Final DNA quality and quantity were also not affected by storage time before DNA extraction or the methods used to extract DNA. We discuss practical aspects of field collection and storage and provide some general recommendations, with a list of pros and cons of different preservation methods of avian blood samples and DNA extracts.     

煮沸裂解法和试剂盒法提取浸矿菌基因组DNA的比较

目的:在生物浸出中,微生物群落结构分析有着重要意义,而群落分析的基础是提取纯度高、损失少的基因组DNA。为了解决这一问题,本实验通过比较两种较常用的DNA提取方法,煮沸裂解法和试剂盒法,寻找一种灵敏、快速、经济实用的制备浸矿细菌基因组DNA的方法。方法:分别用煮沸裂解法和试剂盒法提取6种浸矿菌的基因组DNA,从所提取的基因组DNA浓度、纯度、回收率和对PCR扩增反应的影响方面比较了两种方法的提取效果;用两种方法来处理不同浓度梯度的一种菌,通过实时定量PCR来比较两种方法的灵敏性。结果:相同处理量(108个)的革兰氏阳性菌(1株)、革兰氏阴性菌(4株)、古菌(1株)经两种方法提取的基因组DNA差异较大,煮沸裂解法所得的6组基因组DNA更纯,其OD260/OD280的值更接近1.8-2.0(纯DNA的OD260/OD280在1.8-2.0之间),前者所提DNA回收率最大可达后者的16.7倍;煮沸裂解法只需较少菌(102个)便能让实时定量PCR检测到所提DNA模板浓度,比试剂盒法灵敏。结论:两种方法提取的基因组DNA均可用于后续的PCR扩增,此外,前者提取的DNA浓度随细菌浓度增加而呈线性增大,而后者随菌浓度增大,所提DNA量增加有限,因此,在生物浸出中微生物基因组DNA的提取可直接采用简单快速的煮沸提取法,为实验节约成本和时间。     

煮沸裂解法和试剂盒法提取浸矿菌基因组DNA的比较

目的：在生物浸出中,微生物群落结构分析有着重要意义,而群落分析的基础是提取纯度高、损失少的基因组DNA。为了解决这一问题,本实验通过比较两种较常用的DNA提取方法,煮沸裂解法和试剂盒法,寻找一种灵敏、快速、经济实用的制备浸矿细菌基因组DNA的方法。方法：分别用煮沸裂解法和试剂盒法提取6种浸矿菌的基因组DNA,从所提取的基因组DNA浓度、纯度、回收率和对PCR扩增反应的影响方面比较了两种方法的提取效果;用两种方法来处理不同浓度梯度的一种菌,通过实时定量PCR来比较两种方法的灵敏性。结果：相同处理量（108个）的革兰氏阳性菌（1株）、革兰氏阴性菌（4株）、古菌（1株）经两种方法提取的基因组DNA差异较大,煮沸裂解法所得的6组基因组DNA更纯,其OD260／OD280的值更接近1．8-2．0（纯DNA的OD260／OD280在1．8—2．0之间）,前者所提DNA回收率最大可达后者的16．7倍;煮沸裂解法只需较少菌（102个）便能让实时定量PCR检测到所提DNA模板浓度,比试剂盒法灵敏。结论：两种方法提取的基因组DNA均可用于后续的PCR扩增,此外,前者提取的DNA浓度随细菌浓度增加而呈线性增大,而后者随茵浓度增大,所提DNA量增加有限,因此,在生物浸出中微生物基因组DNA的提取可直接采用简单快速的煮沸提取法,为实验节约成本和时间。     

一种适用于PCR反应的酵母菌、无绿藻及丝状真菌DNA提取方法

目的 介绍一种从酵母、无绿藻及丝状真菌中提取DNA以用于PCR反应的方法。方法 所用菌种包括临床分离的未知菌株和保藏菌株共23株：未知酵母菌（5株）、真皮毛孢子菌（1株）、糠秕马拉色菌（1株）、季也蒙念珠菌（5株）、未知丝状真菌（6株）、无绿藻（1株）、烟曲霉（2株）、拟青霉菌（1株）、茎点霉（1株）。用溶细胞酶（lyticase）结合Biospin真菌基因组DNA提取试剂盒提取基因组DNA,A260／A280检测纯度并计算质量浓度,用真菌通用引物ITS1／ITS4扩增真菌核糖体基因（rDNA）内转录间区ITS基因,经PCR扩增检验所提取的DNA质量。结果 成功提取所有23株真菌基因组DNA,其纯度及质量浓度能满足PCR反应的要求。结论 用溶细胞酶结合Biospin真菌基因组DNA提取试剂盒从酵母菌、无绿藻及丝状真菌提取的DNA可用于PCR反应。     

Use of the diaminobenzoic acid fluorescence assay in conjunction with uv absorbance as a means of quantifying and ascertaining the purity of a DNA preparation

In the course of a study conducted to determine the correlation between covalently bound DNA-ethyl adducts and specific locus mutation induction in maize (W. E. Schy and M. J. Plewa Mutat. Res., 211, 231-241), it was necessary to accurately quantify and ascertain the purity of small amounts of DNA isolated from germinating maize kernels. DNA was purified from leaf primordial tissue that was dissected from germinating maize kernels and quantified by measuring its absorbance at 260 nm. Its absorbance at 260 nm relative to its absorbance at 280 nm (A260/A280 ratio) fell within the range of values that indicated a pure preparation. An attempt to verify the quantity of DNA using a second independent method specific for DNA, the diaminobenzoic acid dihydrochloride fluorescence assay, revealed a significant discrepancy between the two methods. The difference appeared to result from impurities present within the DNA preparation, despite a A260/A280 ratio that indicated otherwise. We found the A260/A280 ratio to be a poor indicator of the purity of DNA preparations, and determined that significant error may result from quantifying DNA using spectrophotometric methods alone. We propose as an alternative, quantifying DNA using the diaminobenzoic acid dihydrochloride assay in conjunction with uv absorbance at 260 nm and using a FLUOR/A260 ratio as an indicator of DNA purity.     

重楼属植物DNA提取的方法研究

为了获得重楼属植物高质量的DNA,以研磨、冻融和细胞溶胀破膜的原理设计了一种DNA提取的方法并与CTAB法和高盐法比较。结果显示该方法提取的重楼属植物DNA纯度（A260/A280=1.792-1.852;A260/A230=2.052-2.267）,产率（6.12-12.84mg/g）较其他两种方法高,降解少,节省药品。所提出的DNA能用于RAPD分析和ITS测序。     

Purification of human genomic DNA from whole blood using sodium perchlorate in place of phenol

We have developed a new, rapid method for the extraction of human genomic DNA from whole blood samples. Traditionally, genomic DNA has been extracted from blood by overnight proteinase K digestion of lysed peripheral lymphocytes followed by phenol/chloroform extraction. In addition to being time consuming, the use of phenol involves inherent risks due to the toxic nature of the reagent. Our method for the extraction of DNA from whole blood uses sodium perchlorate and chloroform instead of phenol with a significant time savings realized as well as fewer hazards to the technician. Furthermore, DNA prepared by this new method is an excellent substrate for restriction endonuclease digestion and Southern hybridization analysis.     

Simple and efficient genomic DNA extraction protocol for molecular characterisation of Phytophthora colocasiae causing taro leaf blight

Genomic DNA extraction protocol with relatively high quantity and purity is prerequisite for the successful molecular identification and characterisation of plant pathogens. Conventional DNA extraction methods are often time-consuming and yield only very poor quantity of genomic DNA for samples with higher mycelial age. In our laboratory, we have aimed at establishing an efficient DNA isolation procedure, exclusively for the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora colocasiae causing serious leaf blight disease in taro. For this a phenol free protocol was adopted, which involves SDS/Proteinase K-based inactivation of protein contaminants, extraction of nucleic acids using chloroform: isoamyl alcohol and later precipitation of genomic DNA using isopropanol and sodium acetate. The purity of the isolated DNA was analysed by A_260/280 and A_260/230 spectrophotometric readings and confirmed by restriction digestion with restriction enzyme Eco RI. In this study, a comparative assessment was done with CTAB method and the commercial genomic DNA purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Fermentas, EU). The extracted DNA was found to be suitable for further downstream applications like ITS amplification of the rDNA ITS region and PCR amplification with species-specific primers.     

东方白鹳粪便总DNA五种提取方法的比较

本研究比较东方白鹳(Ciconia boyciana)粪便总DNA的5种提取方法,旨在为后续物种性别鉴定和DNA条形码鉴定提供合适的方法.采用十六烷基三甲基溴化铵法(CTAB法)、十二烷基磺酸钠裂解法(SDS法)、Tiangen试剂盒法、Qiagen试剂盒法和异硫氰酸胍法(GuSCN法)对取自天津动物园的东方白鹳新鲜粪...     

香菇基因组高分子量DNA的提取

介绍了一种简便快速提取香菇基因组DNA的方法,该法是对提取真菌DNA的SDS和CTAB法进行改进而成,经过修改后的SDS-CTAB法可在较短时间内高效地提取香菇基因组总DNA.制备物经琼脂糖凝胶电泳检测到大于20kb的DNA主带,基本无DNA碎带;OD260/280值显示产物纯度高,完全符合AFLP分析的要求。     

一种同时提取水稻土壤中细胞外和细胞内形态DNA的方法

采用灭菌的水稻田土壤为基质,分别投加细菌基因组DNA和细菌活体,应用该方法提取细胞内和细胞外DNA。结果表明,DNA提取效率平均在75.4%-82.3%,DNA纯度OD260/280在1.75-1.85之间。用细菌16S rDNA通用引物PCR表明,DNA纯度能满足PCR要求,细胞内DNA与细胞外DNA互不污染。