S-Nitrosylation of Ascorbate Peroxidase Is Part of Programmed Cell Death Signaling in Tobacco Bright Yellow-2 Cells

Nitric oxide (NO) is a small redox molecule that acts as a signal in different physiological and stress-related processes in plants. Recent evidence suggests that the biological activity of NO is also mediated by S-nitrosylation, a well-known redox-based posttranslational protein modification. Here, we show that during programmed cell death (PCD), induced by both heat shock (HS) or hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Bright Yellow-2 cells, an increase in S-nitrosylating agents occurred. NO increased in both experimentally induced PCDs, although with different intensities. In H₂O₂-treated cells, the increase in NO was lower than in cells exposed to HS. However, a simultaneous increase in S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), another NO source for S-nitrosylation, occurred in H₂O₂-treated cells, while a decrease in this metabolite was evident after HS. Consistently, different levels of activity and expression of GSNO reductase, the enzyme responsible for GSNO removal, were found in cells subjected to the two different PCD-inducing stimuli: low in H₂O₂-treated cells and high in the heat-shocked ones. Irrespective of the type of S-nitrosylating agent, S-nitrosylated proteins formed upon exposure to both of the PCD-inducing stimuli. Interestingly, cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX), a key enzyme controlling H₂O₂ levels in plants, was found to be S-nitrosylated at the onset of both PCDs. In vivo and in vitro experiments showed that S-nitrosylation of cAPX was responsible for the rapid decrease in its activity. The possibility that S-nitrosylation induces cAPX ubiquitination and degradation and acts as part of the signaling pathway leading to PCD is discussed.Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous and diffusible redox molecule that acts as a signaling compound in both animal and plant systems (Pacher et al., 2007; Besson-Bard et al., 2008). In plants, NO has been found to play a key role in several physiological processes, such as germination, lateral root development, flowering, senescence, stomatal closure, and growth of pollen tubes (Beligni and Lamattina, 2000; Neill et al., 2002; Correa-Aragunde et al., 2004; He et al., 2004; Prado et al., 2004; Carimi et al., 2005). In addition, NO has been reported to be involved in plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses (Leitner et al., 2009; Siddiqui et al., 2011) and in the signaling pathways leading to programmed cell death (PCD; Delledonne et al., 1998; de Pinto et al., 2006; De Michele et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2012; Serrano et al., 2012).The cellular environment may greatly influence the chemical reactivity of NO, giving rise to different biologically active NO-derived compounds, collectively named reactive nitrogen species, which amplify and differentiate its ability to activate physiological and stress-related processes. Many of the biological properties of NO are due to its high affinity with transition metals of metalloproteins as well as its reactivity with reactive oxygen species (ROS; Hill et al., 2010). However, recent evidence suggests that protein S-nitrosylation, due to the addition of NO to reactive Cys thiols, may act as a key mechanism of NO signaling in plants (Wang et al., 2006; Astier et al., 2011). NO is also able to react with reduced glutathione (GSH), the most abundant cellular thiol, thus producing S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), which also acts as an endogenous trans-nitrosylating agent. GSNO is also considered as a NO store and donor and, as it is more stable than NO, acts as a long-distance NO transporter through the floematic flux (Malik et al., 2011). S-Nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR), which is an enzyme conserved from bacteria to humans, has been suggested to play a role in regulating S-nitrosothiols (SNO) and the turnover of S-nitrosylated proteins in plants (Liu et al., 2001; Rusterucci et al., 2007).A number of proteins involved in metabolism, stress responses, and redox homeostasis have been identified as potential targets for S-nitrosylation in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Lindermayr et al., 2005). During the hypersensitive response (HR), 16 proteins were identified to be S-nitrosylated in the seedlings of the same species (Romero-Puertas et al., 2008); in Citrus species, S-nitrosylation of about 50 proteins occurred in the NO-mediated resistance to high salinity (Tanou et al., 2009).However, while the number of candidate proteins for S-nitrosylation is increasing, the functional significance of protein S-nitrosylation has been explained only in a few cases, such as for nonsymbiotic hemoglobin (Perazzolli et al., 2004), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Lindermayr et al., 2005; Wawer et al., 2010), Met adenosyltransferase (Lindermayr et al., 2006), and metacaspase9 (Belenghi et al., 2007). Of particular interest are the cases in which S-nitrosylation involves enzymes controlling ROS homeostasis. For instance, it has been reported that S-nitrosylation of peroxiredoxin IIE regulates the antioxidant function of this enzyme and might contribute to the HR (Romero-Puertas et al., 2007). It has also been shown that in the immunity response, S-nitrosylation of NADPH oxidase inactivates the enzyme, thus reducing ROS production and controlling HR development (Yun et al., 2011).Recently, S-nitrosylation has also been shown to be involved in PCD of nitric oxide excess1 (noe1) rice (Oryza sativa) plants, which are mutated in the OsCATC gene coding for catalase (Lin et al., 2012). In these plants, which show PCD-like phenotypes under high-light conditions, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and thioredoxin are S-nitrosylated. This suggests that the NO-dependent regulation of these proteins is involved in plant PCD, similar to what occurs in animal apoptosis (Sumbayev, 2003; Hara et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2012). The increase in hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) after exposure to high light in noe1 plants is responsible for the production of NO required for leaf cell death induction (Lin et al., 2012). There is a strict relationship between H₂O₂ and NO in PCD activation (Delledonne et al., 2001; de Pinto et al., 2002); however, the mechanism of this interplay is largely still unknown (for review, see Zaninotto et al., 2006; Zhao, 2007; Yoshioka et al., 2011). NO can induce ROS production and vice versa, and their reciprocal modulation in terms of intensity and timing seems to be crucial in determining PCD activation and in controlling HR development (Delledonne et al., 2001; Zhao, 2007; Yun et al., 2011).In previous papers, we demonstrated that heat shock (HS) at 55°C and treatment with 50 mm H₂O₂ promote PCD in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Bright Yellow-2 (BY-2) cells (Vacca et al., 2004; de Pinto et al., 2006; Locato et al., 2008). In both experimental conditions, NO production and decrease in cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX) were observed as early events in the PCD pathway, and cAPX decrease has been suggested to contribute to determining the redox environment required for PCD (de Pinto et al., 2006; Locato et al., 2008).In this study, the production of nitrosylating agents (NO and GSNO) in the first hours of PCD induction by HS or H₂O₂ treatment in tobacco BY-2 cells and their role in PCD were studied. The possibility that S-nitrosylation could be a first step in regulating cAPX activity and turnover as part of the signaling pathway leading to PCD was also investigated.     

Hydrogen Sulfide Regulates Inward-Rectifying K+ Channels in Conjunction with Stomatal Closure

Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) is the third biological gasotransmitter, and in animals, it affects many physiological processes by modulating ion channels. H₂S has been reported to protect plants from oxidative stress in diverse physiological responses. H₂S closes stomata, but the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Here, we report the selective inactivation of current carried by inward-rectifying K⁺ channels of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) guard cells and show its close parallel with stomatal closure evoked by submicromolar concentrations of H₂S. Experiments to scavenge H₂S suggested an effect that is separable from that of abscisic acid, which is associated with water stress. Thus, H₂S seems to define a unique and unresolved signaling pathway that selectively targets inward-rectifying K⁺ channels.Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) is a small bioactive gas that has been known for centuries as an environmental pollutant (Reiffenstein et al., 1992). H₂S is soluble in both polar and, especially, nonpolar solvents (Wang, 2002), and has recently come to be recognized as the third member of a group of so-called biological gasotransmitters. Most importantly, H₂S shows both physical and functional similarities to the other gasotransmitters nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (Wang, 2002), and it has been shown to participate in diverse physiological processes in animals, including cardioprotection, neuromodulation, inflammation, apoptosis, and gastrointestinal functions among others (Kabil et al., 2014). Less is known about H₂S molecular targets and its modes of action. H₂S can directly modify specific targets through protein sulfhydration (the addition of an -SH group to thiol moiety of proteins; Mustafa et al., 2009) or reaction with metal centers (Li and Lancaster, 2013). It can also act indirectly, reacting with NO to form nitrosothiols (Whiteman et al., 2006; Li and Lancaster, 2013). Among its molecular targets, H₂S has been reported to regulate ATP-dependent K⁺ channels (Yang et al., 2005), Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ channels, T- and L-type Ca²⁺ channels, and transient receptor potential channels (Tang et al., 2010; Peers et al., 2012), suggesting H₂S as a key regulator of membrane ion transport.In plants, H₂S is produced enzymatically by the desulfhydration of l-Cys to form H₂S, pyruvate, and ammonia in a reaction catalyzed by the enzyme l-Cys desulfhydrase (Riemenschneider et al., 2005a, 2005b), DES1, that has been characterized in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Alvarez et al., 2010). Alternatively, H₂S can be produced from d-Cys by d-Cys desulfhydrase (Riemenschneider et al., 2005a, 2005b) and in cyanide metabolism by β-cyano-Ala synthase (García et al., 2010). H₂S action was originally related to pathogenesis resistance (Bloem et al., 2004), but in the last decade it has been proven to have an active role in signaling, participating in key physiological processes, such as germination and root organogenesis (Zhang et al., 2008, 2009a), heat stress (Li et al., 2013a, 2013b), osmotic stress (Zhang et al., 2009b), and stomatal movement (García-Mata and Lamattina, 2010; Lisjak et al., 2010, 2011; Jin et al., 2013). Moreover, H₂S was reported to participate in the signaling of plant hormones, including abscisic acid (ABA; García-Mata and Lamattina, 2010; Lisjak et al., 2010; Jin et al., 2013; Scuffi et al., 2014), ethylene (Hou et al., 2013), and auxin (Zhang et al., 2009a).ABA is an important player in plant physiology. Notably, upon water stress, ABA triggers a complex signaling network to restrict the loss of water through the transpiration stream, balancing these needs with those of CO₂ for carbon assimilation. In the guard cells that surround the stomatal pore, ABA induces an increase of cytosolic-free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca2+]_cyt), elevates cytosolic pH (pH_i), and activates the efflux of anions, mainly chloride, through S- and R-type anion channels. The increase in [Ca2+]_cyt inactivates inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (I_KIN); anion efflux depolarizes the plasma membrane, and together with the rise in pH_i, it activates K⁺ efflux through outward-rectifying K⁺ channels (I_KOUT; Blatt, 2000; Schroeder et al., 2001). These changes in ion flux, in turn, generate an osmotically driven reduction in turgor and volume and closure of the stomatal pore. All three gasotransmitters have been implicated in regulating the activity of guard cell ion channels, but direct evidence is available only for NO (Garcia-Mata et al., 2003; Sokolovski et al., 2005). Here, we have used two-electrode voltage clamp measurements to study the role of H₂S in the regulation of the guard cell K⁺ channels of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Our results show that H₂S selectively inactivates I_KIN and that this action parallels that of stomatal closure. These results confirm H₂S as a unique factor regulating guard cell ion transport and indicate that H₂S acts in a manner separable from that of ABA.     

Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

Site-Specific Nitrosoproteomic Identification of Endogenously S-Nitrosylated Proteins in Arabidopsis

Nitric oxide (NO) regulates multiple developmental events and stress responses in plants. A major biologically active species of NO is S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), which is irreversibly degraded by GSNO reductase (GSNOR). The major physiological effect of NO is protein S-nitrosylation, a redox-based posttranslational modification mechanism by covalently linking an NO molecule to a cysteine thiol. However, little is known about the mechanisms of S-nitrosylation-regulated signaling, partly due to limited S-nitrosylated proteins being identified. In this study, we identified 1,195 endogenously S-nitrosylated peptides in 926 proteins from the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) by a site-specific nitrosoproteomic approach, which, to date, is the largest data set of S-nitrosylated proteins among all organisms. Consensus sequence analysis of these peptides identified several motifs that contain acidic, but not basic, amino acid residues flanking the S-nitrosylated cysteine residues. These S-nitrosylated proteins are involved in a wide range of biological processes and are significantly enriched in chlorophyll metabolism, photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and stress responses. Consistently, the gsnor1-3 mutant shows the decreased chlorophyll content and altered photosynthetic properties, suggesting that S-nitrosylation is an important regulatory mechanism in these processes. These results have provided valuable resources and new clues to the studies on S-nitrosylation-regulated signaling in plants.Nitric oxide (NO), a gaseous signaling molecule, plays important regulatory roles in higher plants, including seed dormancy and germination, root development and hypocotyl elongation, floral transition, senescence and cell death, phytohormone signaling, and responses to abiotic and biotic stresses (He et al., 2004; Besson-Bard et al., 2008; Hong et al., 2008; Neill et al., 2008; Leitner et al., 2009; Feng et al., 2013). S-Nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) is a major biologically active form of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and functions as a primary NO donor. The endogenous GSNO homeostasis is highly dynamic, and the GSNO level is negatively regulated by GSNO reductase (GSNOR), an evolutionally conserved enzyme catalyzing irreversibly degrading GSNO (Liu et al., 2001). Mutations in the GSNOR gene cause the elevated GSNO level and consequently severe abnormalities under physiological and pathological conditions in various species (Liu et al., 2004; Feechan et al., 2005; Que et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2009; Moore et al., 2009; Kwon et al., 2012).In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), GSNOR1 is a single-copy gene, and the enzymatic activity of the encoded protein has been biochemically characterized (Sakamoto et al., 2002). Genetic studies revealed that the gsnor1-1 and gsnor1-2 mutants are gain-of-function mutations with increased GSNOR activity and a decreased cellular S-nitrosothiol level. Conversely, gsnor1-3 is a loss-of-function mutant with a significantly increased S-nitrosothiol level (Feechan et al., 2005). The defense responses mediated by distinct resistance (R) genes are significantly impaired in the gsnor1-3 mutant, and GSNOR1 functions as a positive regulator of the salicylic acid-regulated signaling network in the defense response (Feechan et al., 2005). In a genetic screen for thermotolerance-defective mutants, the sensitive to hot temperatures5 (hot5) mutant was characterized as having decreased heat acclimation and was shown to be allelic to gsnor1, indicating the importance of GSNOR1-regulated NO homeostasis in the regulation of the abiotic stress response (Lee et al., 2008). In an independent genetic screen for the oxidative stress-related mutants, the paraquat resistant2 (par2) mutant was also identified to be allelic to gsnor1, which showed an anti-cell death phenotype and multiple developmental defects, revealing the critical role of GSNOR1/HOT5/PAR2 in the regulation of oxidative stress-induced cell death (Chen et al., 2009). Similar to gsnor1-3, the hot5 and par2 allelic mutants also accumulate the significantly increased level of NO. As a result of this defect, these gsnor1/hot5/par2 mutants show a pleiotropic phenotype, with severe developmental abnormalities in both reproductive and vegetative stages (Lee et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2009; Kwon et al., 2012). These studies highlight the critical role of GSNOR1/HOT5/PAR2-modulated NO homeostasis in diverse physiological processes, including plant growth and development as well as in responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses. However, little is known about the underpinning molecular mechanisms of the NO-modulated signaling in various physiological processes.A major physiological effect of NO is executed by protein S-nitrosylation, a reversible posttranslational modification by covalent addition of an NO molecule onto a Cys thiol to form S-nitrosothiol (Jaffrey et al., 2001; Stamler et al., 2001). S-Nitrosothiols are dynamically labile in response to the intracellular redox status, allowing protein S-nitrosylation as a highly sensitive mechanism in the regulation of cellular signaling (Stamler et al., 2001; Hess et al., 2005). Emerging evidence indicates that S-nitrosylation regulates the function of the modified proteins by various mechanisms, including enzymatic activity, stability, subcellular localization, three-dimensional conformation changes, protein-protein interaction, and ligand binding (Hess et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2006; Astier et al., 2011; Gupta, 2011; Hess and Stamler, 2012). In Arabidopsis, S-nitrosylation has been shown as an important mechanism in regulating the stress responses. The activity of Met adenosyltransferase1 (MAT1), which catalyzes S-adenosyl-Met synthesis, was shown to be inhibited by S-nitrosylation (Lindermayr et al., 2006). S-nitrosylation negatively regulates the activity of a peroxynitrite detoxification enzyme, peroxiredoxin II E (PrxII E), and an NADPH oxidase, thereby modulating the oxidative stress in the defense response (Romero-Puertas et al., 2007; Yun et al., 2011). Moreover, S-nitrosylation has also been shown to regulate the conformational changes of NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGEN-RELATED1 (NPR1), a master regulator of the defense response, and the activity of SALICYLIC ACID-BINDING PROTEIN3 (SABP3), a key enzyme for salicylic acid biosynthesis (Tada et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009). In addition, S-nitrosylation of TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE1 (TIR1) and Arabidopsis Histidine Phosphotransfer Protein1 (AHP1), two key signaling components of the auxin and cytokinin pathways, respectively, plays an important role in regulating respective phytohormone signaling (Terrile et al., 2012; Feng et al., 2013). These studies illustrate the importance of S-nitrosylation in the regulation of diverse physiological processes in plants.S-Nitrosylation has been considered as one of the most important posttranslational modification mechanisms (Lane et al., 2001; Stamler et al., 2001; Hess et al., 2005). A growing number of S-nitrosylated proteins have been identified using the proteomic approach. To date, the S-nitrosoproteomic studies have identified more than 2,200 S-nitrosylated proteins, covering more than 4,100 S-nitrosylated Cys residues. Of those S-nitrosylated proteins, more than 95% were identified from mammals (Lee et al., 2012). Several proteomic studies in Arabidopsis identified a number of S-nitrosylated proteins (Lindermayr et al., 2005; Romero-Puertas et al., 2008; Palmieri et al., 2010; Fares et al., 2011; Puyaubert et al., 2014). In GSNO-treated cell suspension cultures and NO-treated leaves derived from Arabidopsis, 63 and 52 S-nitrosylated proteins were identified, which are involved in stress response, redox homeostasis, cytoskeleton organization, metabolic processes, and cellular signaling (Lindermayr et al., 2005). In an independent study, 16 S-nitrosylated proteins were identified from Arabidopsis seedlings undergoing the hypersensitive response (Romero-Puertas et al., 2008). In another independent analysis, 46 S-nitrosylated proteins were identified from cultured Arabidopsis suspension cells (Fares et al., 2011). In a more specific analysis, 11 mitochondria proteins were identified to be S-nitrosylated and/or glutathionylated (Palmieri et al., 2010). More recently, 62 endogenously S-nitrosylated proteins were identified from Arabidopsis seedlings (Puyaubert et al., 2014). Notably, a large number of the S-nitrosylated proteins are repeatedly identified in these analyses, thus confirming the validation of each study. Because of the labile nature of S-nitrosylation, most of the S-nitrosoproteomic studies used the protein samples treated with NO donors or the protein extracts prepared from NO donor-treated cells or tissues. The Arabidopsis gsnor1-3 mutants accumulate an excessive amount of NO (Feechan et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2009), and the identification of S-nitrosylated proteins in gsnor1-3 should depict a more comprehensive map of S-nitrosoproteome in Arabidopsis, and provide important clues on the molecular basis of the pleiotropic phenotype of the mutant.Because of the labile and dynamic nature of protein S-nitrosylation, large-scale identification of endogenously S-nitrosylated proteins remains technically challenging. At present, two major methods for identification of S-nitrosoproteome are shotgun and site-specific nitrosoproteomic analysis, both of which are based on the biotin-switch method and mass spectrometry (Jaffrey et al., 2001; Hao et al., 2006; Torta et al., 2008). In the shotgun analysis, S-nitrosylated proteins were first biotinylated, enriched by affinity-chromatography, and then identified by mass spectrometry. Although the method is relatively simple, the number of S-nitrosylated proteins identified by shotgun proteomics is often few due to various technical limitations (Torta et al., 2008). The identification capacity of nitrosoproteomics was greatly improved by the site-specific strategy, in which biotinylated proteins were first digested by trypsin and the enriched peptides were then characterized by mass spectrometry (Hao et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2010). Moreover, S-nitrosylated Cys residues can also be identified from site-specific nitrosoproteomic analysis.In this study, we performed a large-scale, site-specific proteomic analysis of endogenously S-nitrosylated proteins in Arabidopsis wild-type and gsnor1-3 seedlings, and identified 1,195 endogenously S-nitrosylated peptides in 926 proteins from the model plant species, representing the largest data set thus far reported in any organisms and providing important resources for future studies on S-nitrosylation-regulated signaling in plants.     

NdhV Is a Subunit of NADPH Dehydrogenase Essential for Cyclic Electron Transport in Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803

Two mutants sensitive to heat stress for growth and impaired in NADPH dehydrogenase (NDH-1)-dependent cyclic electron transport around photosystem I (NDH-CET) were isolated from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 transformed with a transposon-bearing library. Both mutants had a tag in the same sll0272 gene, encoding a protein highly homologous to NdhV identified in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Deletion of the sll0272 gene (ndhV) did not influence the assembly of NDH-1 complexes and the activities of CO₂ uptake and respiration but reduced the activity of NDH-CET. NdhV interacted with NdhS, a ferredoxin-binding subunit of cyanobacterial NDH-1 complex. Deletion of NdhS completely abolished NdhV, but deletion of NdhV had no effect on the amount of NdhS. Reduction of NDH-CET activity was more significant in ΔndhS than in ΔndhV. We therefore propose that NdhV cooperates with NdhS to accept electrons from reduced ferredoxin.Cyanobacterial NADPH dehydrogenase (NDH-1) complexes are localized in the thylakoid membrane (Ohkawa et al., 2001, 2002; Zhang et al., 2004; Xu et al., 2008; Battchikova et al., 2011b) and participate in a variety of bioenergetic reactions, such as respiration, cyclic electron transport around photosystem I (NDH-CET), and CO₂ uptake (Ogawa, 1991; Mi et al., 1992; Ohkawa et al., 2000). Structurally, the cyanobacterial NDH-1 complexes closely resemble energy-converting complex I in eubacteria and the mitochondrial respiratory chain regardless of the absence of homologs of three subunits in cyanobacterial genomes that constitute the catalytically active core of complex I (Friedrich et al., 1995; Friedrich and Scheide, 2000; Arteni et al., 2006). Over the past decade, new subunits of NDH-1 complexes specific to oxygenic photosynthesis have been identified in several cyanobacterial strains. They are NdhM to NdhQ and NdhS (Prommeenate et al., 2004; Battchikova et al., 2005, 2011b; Nowaczyk et al., 2011; Wulfhorst et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2014b, 2015), in addition to NdhL first identified in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 (hereafter Synechocystis 6803) about 20 years ago (Ogawa, 1992). Among them, NdhS possesses a ferredoxin (Fd)-binding motif and was shown to bind Fd, which suggested that Fd is one of the electron donors to NDH-1 complexes (Mi et al., 1995; Battchikova et al., 2011b; Ma and Ogawa, 2015). Deletion of NdhS strongly reduced the activity of NDH-CET but had no effect on respiration and CO₂ uptake (Battchikova et al., 2011b; Ma and Ogawa, 2015). The NDH-CET plays an important role in coping with various environmental stresses regardless of its elusive mechanism. For example, this function can greatly alleviate heat-sensitive growth phenotypes (Wang et al., 2006a; Zhao et al., 2014a). Thus, heat treatment strategy can help in identifying the proteins essential to NDH-CET.Here, a new oxygenic photosynthesis-specific (OPS) subunit NdhV was identified in Synechocystis 6803 with the help of heat treatment strategy, and its deletion did not influence the assembly of NDH-1L and NDH-1MS complexes and the activities of CO₂ uptake and respiration but impaired the NDH-CET activity. We give evidence that NdhV interacts with NdhS and is another component of Fd-binding domain of cyanobacterial NDH-1 complex. A possible role of NdhV on the NDH-CET activity is discussed.     

Genomics and Localization of the Arabidopsis DHHC-Cysteine-Rich Domain S-Acyltransferase Protein Family

Protein lipid modification of cysteine residues, referred to as S-palmitoylation or S-acylation, is an important secondary and reversible modification that regulates membrane association, trafficking, and function of target proteins. This enzymatic reaction is mediated by protein S-acyl transferases (PATs). Here, the phylogeny, genomic organization, protein topology, expression, and localization pattern of the 24 PAT family members from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) is described. Most PATs are expressed at ubiquitous levels and tissues throughout the development, while few genes are expressed especially during flower development preferentially in pollen and stamen. The proteins display large sequence and structural variations but exhibit a common protein topology that is preserved in PATs from various organisms. Arabidopsis PAT proteins display a complex targeting pattern and were detected at the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, endosomal compartments, and the vacuolar membrane. However, most proteins were targeted to the plasma membrane. This large concentration of plant PAT activity to the plasma membrane suggests that the plant cellular S-acylation machinery is functionally different compared with that of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and mammalians.Cellular functions are regulated by various protein modifications. These modifications can occur in a controlled, reversible, and transient manner in response to different signals (Huber and Hardin, 2004; Stulemeijer and Joosten, 2008). Protein phosphorylation is the most prominent modification and is regulated by the balanced activities of protein kinases and protein phosphatases (Hardie, 1999; Luan, 2003). However, other modifications, like ubiquitination and sumoylation (Miura and Hasegawa, 2010) or nitrosylation (Lamattina et al., 2003), also regulate protein functions.A less well characterized reversible lipid modification is the thioesterification of Cys residues, which is known as S-palmitoylation or more generally referred to as S-acylation (Hemsley and Grierson, 2008; Sorek et al., 2009). S-acyl modifications mainly affect membrane attachment and trafficking of proteins. They are required for the dynamic association of proteins with membrane subdomains (Sorek et al., 2007, 2010) and for the cycling between different cellular membranes (Rocks et al., 2005). In addition, S-acylation can influence the stability of proteins (Valdez-Taubas and Pelham, 2005; Abrami et al., 2006), modulates the functions of proteins (Gubitosi-Klug et al., 2005), or mediates the interaction between different proteins (Charrin et al., 2002; Flannery et al., 2010).S-acyl modification of proteins is brought about by palmitoyltransferases, correctly referred to as protein S-acyltransferases (PATs; Mitchell et al., 2006). Originally, these enzymes were identified in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Lobo et al., 2002; Roth et al., 2002). Sequence analyses of the yeast PAT enzymes revealed that they share a common structure mainly composed of four predicted transmembrane domains (TMDs) and a stretch of Asp-His-His-Cys (DHHC) within a Cys-rich domain (CRD; Pfam accession, PF01529; InterPro entry, IPR001594). Mutational analyses revealed that the Cys residue of the DHHC stretch is necessary for autoacylation and for the modification of target proteins. Therefore, this domain appears to represent the active site of these enzymes (Lobo et al., 2002; Roth et al., 2002). Detailed analyses of the lipid modifications of Rho-of-plants6 (ROP6; Sorek et al., 2007) and of the Calcineurin-B like (CBL) proteins 1 and 2 (Batistič et al., 2008, 2012) revealed that plant PATs either transfer palmitate or stearate to these substrates.In plants, so far only one PAT was characterized in detail. A screen of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants resulted in the identification of TIP GROWTH DEFECTIVE1 (TIP1), which is affected in root hair formation and growth (Schiefelbein et al., 1993; Ryan et al., 1998). Mapping of the mutant allele revealed that TIP1 encodes a DHHC-CRD-containing protein, and it was shown that this protein is indeed S-acylated (Hemsley et al., 2005, 2008). Moreover, TIP1 contains N-terminal ankyrin repeats, related to the yeast PAT Akr1, and is able to complement the PAT function in the akr1Δ yeast strain, corroborating that TIP1 has a PAT enzyme function (Hemsley et al., 2005). Although our knowledge about the plant S-acylome and S-acylation machinery is still limited (Hemsley, 2009), previous studies on the S-acylation of plant proteins revealed that these modifications could occur at different cellular membranes like the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; Adjobo-Hermans et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2008), the Golgi (Zeng et al., 2007), or directly at the plasma membrane (PM; Sorek et al., 2007). Furthermore, recent studies on the lipid modification of the tonoplast-associated CBL2 protein from Arabidopsis implicated that S-acylation can also occur at the vacuolar membrane (Batistič et al., 2012). These findings suggested that the PAT enzymes that modify these targets reside at different membranes within the plant cell.In this report, the complement of the Arabidopsis PAT gene loci was examined to perform a comprehensive analysis of this gene and protein family. These analyses revealed that at least 24 PAT gene loci are encoded in the Arabidopsis genome. All Arabidopsis PATs are expressed. Expression occurs mainly at steady levels throughout development and in most tissues examined. However, some PATs are preferentially expressed at certain developmental stages or cell types especially during flowering and in pollen, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the proteins are highly divergent. Nevertheless, most PAT proteins harbor a similar structural topology and preserved sequence motifs that are representative of this class of enzymes. Functional analyses on several proteins by yeast complementation analyses indicate that Arabidopsis PATs represent active enzymes, even if their sequence deviates from the regular standard sequence composition previously reported for functional PATs. Moreover, the protein localizations of all 24 Arabidopsis PATs were examined. This revealed a complex targeting pattern of PATs showing that S-acylation can occur at different cellular membranes within the cell. Remarkably, the plant PATs analyzed are mainly targeted to the PM, indicating that the plant S-acylation machinery has a different organization and function compared with the mammalian and yeast PAT machinery.     

Focus Issue on Calcium Signaling: Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase CPK6 Positively Functions in Induction by Yeast Elicitor of Stomatal Closure and Inhibition by Yeast Elicitor of Light-Induced Stomatal Opening in Arabidopsis

Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure that is mediated by a Ca²⁺-dependent signaling pathway. A Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinase, CPK6, positively regulates activation of ion channels in abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate signaling, leading to stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). YEL also inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. However, it remains unknown whether CPK6 is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure or in inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. In this study, we investigated the roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis. Disruption of CPK6 gene impaired induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. Activation by YEL of nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation channels was impaired in cpk6-2 guard cells, and transient elevations elicited by YEL in cytosolic-free Ca²⁺ concentration were suppressed in cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 guard cells. YEL activated slow anion channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1 and inhibited inward-rectifying K⁺ channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1. The cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 mutations inhibited YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide accumulation in guard cells and apoplast of rosette leaves but did not affect YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide production in the apoplast of rosette leaves. These results suggest that CPK6 positively functions in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis and is a convergent point of signaling pathways for stomatal closure in response to abiotic and biotic stress.Stomata, formed by pairs of guard cells, play a critical role in regulation of plant CO₂ uptake and water loss, thus critically influencing plant growth and water stress responsiveness. Guard cells respond to a variety of abiotic and biotic stimuli, such as light, drought, and pathogen attack (Israelsson et al., 2006; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Melotto et al., 2008).Elicitors derived from microbial surface mimic pathogen attack and induce stomatal closure in various plant species such as Solanum lycopersicum (Lee et al., 1999), Commelina communis (Lee et al., 1999), Hordeum vulgare (Koers et al., 2011), and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Melotto et al., 2006; Khokon et al., 2010). Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010; Salam et al., 2013). Our recent studies showed that YEL inhibits light-induced stomatal opening and that protein phosphorylation is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening (Salam et al., 2013).Cytosolic Ca²⁺ has long been recognized as a conserved second messenger in stomatal movement (Shimazaki et al., 2007; Roelfsema and Hedrich 2010; Hubbard et al., 2012). Elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca2+]_cyt) is triggered by influx of Ca²⁺ from apoplast and release of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores in guard cell signaling (Leckie et al., 1998; Hamilton et al., 2000; Pei et al., 2000; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003; Lemtiri-Chlieh et al., 2003). The influx of Ca²⁺ is carried by nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation (I_Ca) channels that are activated by plasma membrane hyperpolarization and H₂O₂ (Pei et al., 2000; Murata et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003). Elevation of [Ca2+]_cyt activates slow anion (S-type) channels and down-regulates inward-rectifying potassium (K_in) channels in guard cells (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Grabov and Blatt, 1999). The activation of S-type channels is a hallmark of stomatal closure, and the suppression of K_in channels is favorable to stomatal closure but not to stomatal opening (Pei et al., 1997; Kwak et al., 2001; Xue et al., 2011; Uraji et al., 2012).YEL induces stomatal closure with extracellular H₂O₂ production, intracellular H₂O₂ accumulation, activation of I_Ca channels, and transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010). However, it remains to be clarified whether YEL activates S-type channels and inhibits K_in channels in guard cells.Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) are regulators in Ca²⁺-dependent guard cell signaling (Mori et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2007; Geiger et al., 2010, 2011; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011; Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). In guard cells, CDPKs regulate activation of S-type and I_Ca channels and inhibition of K_in channels (Mori et al., 2006; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011). A CDPK, CPK6, positively regulates activation of S-type channels and I_Ca channels without affecting H₂O₂ production in abscisic acid (ABA)- and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-induced stomatal closure (Mori et al., 2006; Munemasa et al., 2011). CPK6 phosphorylates and activates SLOW ANION CHANNEL-ASSOCIATED1 expressed in Xenopus spp. oocyte (Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). These findings underline the role of CPK6 in regulation of ion channel activation and stomatal movement, leading us to test whether CPK6 regulates the induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening.In this study, we investigated activation of S-type channels and inhibition of K_in channels by YEL and roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. For this purpose, we examined the effects of mutation of CPK6 on induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening, activation of I_Ca channels, transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations, activation of S-type channels, inhibition of K_in channels, H₂O₂ production in leaves, and H₂O₂ accumulation in leaves and guard cells.     

Production and Characterization of Synthetic Carboxysome Shells with Incorporated Luminal Proteins

Spatial segregation of metabolism, such as cellular-localized CO₂ fixation in C4 plants or in the cyanobacterial carboxysome, enhances the activity of inefficient enzymes by selectively concentrating them with their substrates. The carboxysome and other bacterial microcompartments (BMCs) have drawn particular attention for bioengineering of nanoreactors because they are self-assembling proteinaceous organelles. All BMCs share an architecturally similar, selectively permeable shell that encapsulates enzymes. Fundamental to engineering carboxysomes and other BMCs for applications in plant synthetic biology and metabolic engineering is understanding the structural determinants of cargo packaging and shell permeability. Here we describe the expression of a synthetic operon in Escherichia coli that produces carboxysome shells. Protein domains native to the carboxysome core were used to encapsulate foreign cargo into the synthetic shells. These synthetic shells can be purified to homogeneity with or without luminal proteins. Our results not only further the understanding of protein-protein interactions governing carboxysome assembly, but also establish a platform to study shell permeability and the structural basis of the function of intact BMC shells both in vivo and in vitro. This system will be especially useful for developing synthetic carboxysomes for plant engineering.A key enzyme in photosynthesis is the CO₂ fixation enzyme ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco). Rubisco not only fixes CO₂, resulting in carbon assimilation, but it can also fix O₂, leading to photorespiration. Suppressing the unwanted oxygenase activity of Rubisco by sequestering Rubisco with a source of CO₂ is Nature’s solution to this substrate discrimination problem. While C4 plants compartmentalize CO₂ fixation in specific cells (Hibberd et al., 2008; Parry et al., 2011), cyanobacteria have evolved a specialized organelle composed entirely of protein to encapsulate Rubisco—the carboxysome.The carboxysome is just one type of bacterial microcompartment (BMC), widespread, functionally diverse bacterial organelles (Axen et al., 2014). All BMCs consist of an enzymatic core surrounded by a selectively permeable protein shell (Kerfeld et al., 2005; Tanaka et al., 2008; Chowdhury et al., 2014; Kerfeld and Erbilgin, 2015). While the encapsulated enzymes differ among functionally distinct BMCs, they share an architecturally similar shell composed of three types of proteins: BMC-H, BMC-T, and BMC-P forming hexamers, pseudohexamers, and pentamers, respectively (Kerfeld and Erbilgin, 2015). These constitute the building blocks of a self-assembling, apparently icosahedral shell with a diameter ranging from 40 to 400 nm (Shively et al., 1973a,b, 1998; Price and Badger, 1991; Bobik et al., 1999; Iancu et al., 2007, 2010; Petit et al., 2013; Erbilgin et al., 2014). Recent studies have also shown that in the biogenesis of BMCs an encapsulation peptide (EP) (Fan and Bobik, 2011; Kinney et al., 2012; Aussignargues et al., 2015; Jakobson et al., 2015), a short (approximately 18 residues) amphipathic α-helix mediates interactions between a subset of core protein and the shell (Fan and Bobik, 2011; Choudhary et al., 2012; Kinney et al., 2012; Lawrence et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2014; Aussignargues et al., 2015). Indeed, because they are self-assembling organelles composed entirely of protein, BMCs hold great promise for diverse applications in bioengineering and development of bionanomaterials (Frank et al., 2013; Chowdhury et al., 2014; Chessher et al., 2015; Kerfeld and Erbilgin, 2015); the key features of BMCs include selective permeability, spatial colocalization of enzymes, the establishment of private cofactor pools, and the potentially beneficial effects of confinement on protein stability. For example, introducing carboxysomes into plants could provide a saltational enhancement of crop photosynthesis (Price et al., 2013; Zarzycki et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2014; McGrath and Long, 2014).The β-carboxysome, which sequesters form 1B Rubisco, has been an important model system for the study of the structural basis of carboxysome function, assembly, and engineering (Kerfeld et al., 2005; Tanaka et al., 2008; Cameron et al., 2013; Aussignargues et al., 2015; Cai et al., 2015). Beta-carboxysomes assemble from the inside out (Cameron et al., 2013; Gonzalez-Esquer et al., 2015). Two proteins that are absolutely conserved and unique to β-carboxysomes, CcmM and CcmN, play essential roles in this process: CcmM crosslinks Rubisco through its C-terminal Rubisco small subunit-like domains (SSLDs; pfam00101); CcmM and CcmN interact through their N-terminal domains; and C-terminal EP of CcmN interacts with the carboxysome shell.Here we describe a system for producing synthetic β-carboxysome shells and encapsulating nonnative cargo. We constructed a synthetic operon composed of ccmK1, ccmK2, ccmL, and ccmO, genes encoding, respectively, two BMC-H proteins, a BMC-P protein, and a BMC-T protein of the carboxysome shell of the halotolerant cyanobacterium, Halothece sp. PCC 7418 (Halo hereafter). Recombinant shells composed of all four proteins were produced and purified. We also demonstrated that the terminal α-helices of CcmK1 and CcmK2 are not, as had been proposed (Samborska and Kimber, 2012), required for the shell formation, and that the synthetic shell is a single-layered protein membrane. Cargo could be targeted to the interior of the synthetic shells using either the EP of CcmN or the N-terminal domain of CcmM; the latter observation provides new insight into the organization of the β-carboxysome. Our results not only further the understanding of protein-protein interactions governing carboxysome assembly but also provide a platform to study carboxysome shell permeability. These results will be useful in guiding the design and optimization of carboxysomes and other BMCs for introduction into plants.