首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Well-balanced mitochondrial fission and fusion processes are essential for nervous system development. Loss of function of the main mitochondrial fission mediator, dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), is lethal early during embryonic development or around birth, but the role of mitochondrial fission in adult neurons remains unclear. Here we show that inducible Drp1 ablation in neurons of the adult mouse forebrain results in progressive, neuronal subtype-specific alterations of mitochondrial morphology in the hippocampus that are marginally responsive to antioxidant treatment. Furthermore, DRP1 loss affects synaptic transmission and memory function. Although these changes culminate in hippocampal atrophy, they are not sufficient to cause neuronal cell death within 10 weeks of genetic Drp1 ablation. Collectively, our in vivo observations clarify the role of mitochondrial fission in neurons, demonstrating that Drp1 ablation in adult forebrain neurons compromises critical neuronal functions without causing overt neurodegeneration.In addition to their crucial importance in energy conversion, mitochondria serve many other housekeeping functions, including calcium buffering, amino-acid and steroid biosynthesis as well as fatty acids beta-oxidation and regulation of cell death. During the past decade, it has become increasingly clear that processes regulating mitochondrial morphology and ultrastructure are influenced by specific cellular requirements upon which mitochondria, in a precisely regulated manner, undergo fusion and division events.1 Maintaining this balance is especially important for highly energy-consuming, polarized cells such as neurons, where single organellar units sprouting from the mitochondrial network are transported along the cytoskeleton into dendrites and spines to meet local energy requirements.2 In addition, elaborate quality-control mechanisms also rely on mitochondrial dynamics: whereas defective organelles are sequestered by fission, enabling their removal from the mitochondrial network,3, 4 fusion supports qualitative homogeneity of the syncytium through complementation.5Mitochondrial fusion and fission are mediated by large GTPases of the dynamin superfamily.6 The outer mitochondrial membrane mitofusins 1 (MFN1) and 2 (MFN2) tether mitochondrial membranes by homodimer or heterodimer formation,7 thereby initiating fusion of the organelles, a process that also involves the inner mitochondrial membrane-associated GTPase Optic Atrophy 1.8 In addition, MFN2 also mediates contacts between mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum.9 The only known mammalian mitochondrial fission protein, Dynamin-Related Protein 1 (Drp1), translocates upon dephosphorylation by calcineurin10 to fission sites where it binds to mitochondrial fission factor.11 Drp1 translocation is preceded by ER membranes wrapping around mitochondria to constrict the organelles,12 thereby facilitating the formation of multimeric Drp1 complexes that, upon GTP hydrolysis, further tighten to complete the process of mitochondrial fission.13Genetic evidence in mice and humans indicates that mitochondrial dynamics are crucially important in neurons: in humans, a sporadic dominant-negative DRP1 mutation caused a lethal syndromic defect with abnormal brain development;14 similarly, constitutive Drp1 knockout in the mouse brain leads to lethal neurodevelopmental defects.15, 16 Although the crucial role of Drp1 during brain development is undisputed, studies on Drp1 function in postmitotic (adult) neurons are scarce; likewise, Drp1 ablation studies in primary cultures have so far failed to yield a conclusive picture. In vitro, Drp1 ablation is reported to lead to a super-elongated neuroprotective17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 or an aggregated mitochondrial phenotype associated with neurodegeneration.15, 16, 25, 26, 27 These discrepancies are probably due to different experimental conditions: neuronal health is indeed influenced by the onset and duration of Drp1 inhibition, which varies considerably among the cited reports,28 and different types of neuronal cultures studied display different sensitivity to Drp1 inhibition. In vivo, Drp1 ablation in Purkinje cells results in oxidative stress and neurodegeneration,29 demonstrating that Drp1 is essential for postmitotic neurons'' health. In contrast, transient pharmacological Drp1 inhibition is neuroprotective in several mouse ischemia models, indicating that temporarily blocking mitochondrial fission holds therapeutic potential.30, 31, 32To elucidate the consequences of blocked mitochondrial fission in the central nervous system in vivo, we bypassed the critical role of Drp1 during brain development by generating Drp1flx/flx mice15 expressing tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase under the control of the CaMKIIα promoter.33 Upon induced Drp1 deletion in postmitotic adult mouse forebrain neurons, mice develop progressive, neuronal subtype-specific alterations in mitochondrial shape and distribution in the absence of overt neurodegeneration. In addition, respiratory capacity, ATP content, synaptic reserve pool vesicle recruitment as well as spatial working memory are impaired, demonstrating that severely dysregulated mitochondrial dynamics can compromise critical neuronal functions in vivo without causing neuronal cell death.  相似文献   

2.
3.
4.
5.
Mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene have been associated with Parkinson''s disease, and its inhibition opens potential new therapeutic options. Among the drug inhibitors of both wild-type and mutant LRRK2 forms is the 2-arylmethyloxy-5-subtitutent-N-arylbenzamide GSK257815A. Using the well-established dopaminergic cell culture model SH-SY5Y, we have investigated the effects of GSK2578215A on crucial neurodegenerative features such as mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy. GSK2578215A induces mitochondrial fragmentation of an early step preceding autophagy. This increase in autophagosome results from inhibition of fusion rather than increases in synthesis. The observed effects were shared with LRRK2-IN-1, a well-described, structurally distinct kinase inhibitor compound or when knocking down LRRK2 expression using siRNA. Studies using the drug mitochondrial division inhibitor 1 indicated that translocation of the dynamin-related protein-1 has a relevant role in this process. In addition, autophagic inhibitors revealed the participation of autophagy as a cytoprotective response by removing damaged mitochondria. GSK2578215A induced oxidative stress as evidenced by the accumulation of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal in SH-SY5Y cells. The mitochondrial-targeted reactive oxygen species scavenger MitoQ positioned these species as second messengers between mitochondrial morphologic alterations and autophagy. Altogether, our results demonstrated the relevance of LRRK2 in mitochondrial-activated pathways mediating in autophagy and cell fate, crucial features in neurodegenerative diseases.Nowadays, Parkinson''s disease (PD) constitutes the main motor disorder and the second neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer''s disease. Etiology of PD remains unknown, but both environmental and genetic factors have been implicated. Among the genes associated with PD is the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2, PARK8, OMIM 607060) encoding gene encoded by PARK8. Indeed, LRRK2 mutations have been described in a substantial number of idiopathic late-onset PD patients without a known family history of the disease.1, 2, 3The physiologic function remains unknown. It localizes in the cytosol as well as in specific membrane subdomains, including mitochondria, autophagosomes and autolysosomes,4 and interacts with a whole array of proteins, including both α- and β-tubulin,5, 6 tau,7 α-synuclein8 and F-actin.9 LRRK2 gene mutations, including the most common G2019S,3 are associated with increases in toxic putative kinase activity.1, 10 LRRK2 overexpression is toxic to cultured cells,11, 12 and LRRK2 loss did not cause neurodegenerative changes (for a review see Tong and Shen13). However, LRRK2 transgenic mice lack obvious PD-like behavioral phenotypes.14 LRRK2-associated PD patients show degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra.15 Data from our own group and others have associated mitochondrial apoptotical pathways with PD,16, 17, 18 and, in this context, LRRK2 mutant-mediated toxicity could be due to mitochondria-dependent apoptosis.19 There is considerable evidence for impaired mitochondrial function and morphology in both early-onset, autosomal recessive inherited PD and late-onset sporadic PD.Mitochondrial dynamics include several mechanisms, such as fission, fusion and mitophagy.20, 21 Altered fission/fusion dynamics might be a common pathogenic pathway of neurodegenerative diseases. It is well documented that mitochondrial dynamics constitute a relevant issue in some experimental neurodegenerative models.20, 22, 23, 24, 25 Mitochondrial dynamics is tightly regulated by cellular pathways including those participated by the dynamin-related protein-1 (Drp1). Drp1 mostly locates in the cytoplasm, but is stimulated after fission stimuli to migrate to the mitochondria. Once there, Drp1 forms ring-like structures, which wrap around the scission site to constrict the mitochondrial membrane resulting in mitochondrial fission.26, 27 Interestingly, a functional interaction between PD-associated LRRK2 and members of the dynamin GTPase superfamily has been described.28Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) is an active cellular response, which functions in the intracellular degradation system of cellular debris such as damaged organelles. Whether autophagy promotes cell death or enhances survival is still controversial.29, 30 It requires the formation of autophagosomes where cellular content is to be degraded by the action of lysosomal enzymatic content. Autophagosome formation is regulated by an orderly action of >30 autophagy-related (Atg) proteins. Among them is the microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3), a homolog of Apg8p, which is essential for autophagy in yeast and is associated with autophagosome membranes.31 Interestingly, these vesicles are mostly highly mobile in the cytoplasm.32 Wild-type and mutant LRRK2 expression has been related to autophagy.4, 33, 34, 35, 36 Reactive oxygen species (ROS) function as relevant second messengers after several stimuli, including mitochondrial disruption. Exacerbated ROS increases might result in overactivation of antioxidant systems and yield harmful oxidative stress. Among oxidative stress hallmarks is the accumulation of α,β-unsaturated hydroxyalkenal 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE), whose accumulation has been reported in PD post-mortem patient brains,37, 38 thus giving a significant relevance to ROS in the pathogenesis of PD.All these results indicate LRRK2 as a promising pharmacologic target in PD treatment.39 Several LRRK2 inhibitor drugs have been synthetized, such as the potent and highly selective 2-arylmethyloxy-5-substitutent-N-arylbenzamide (GSK2578215A). GSK2578215A exhibits biochemical IC50s of 10.9 nM against wild-type LRRK2, and possesses a high ratio of brain to plasma distribution.40 This study provides key insights into the mechanisms downstream of LRRK2 inhibition, and spreads light onto an underexplored, yet potentially tractable therapeutic target for treating LRRK2-associated PD. We demonstrate how inhibition of this kinase results in the activation of cellular death pathways such as the mitochondrial fission machinery, and how cells reply by activating a protective autophagic response. Our results show the presence of oxidative stress hallmarks, thus pointing to a key function for ROS, placed downstream of mitochondrial fission.  相似文献   

6.
Evidence indicates that nitrosative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction participate in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer''s disease (AD). Amyloid beta (Aβ) and peroxynitrite induce mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death by abnormal activation of dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), a large GTPase that regulates mitochondrial fission. The exact mechanisms of mitochondrial fragmentation and DRP1 overactivation in AD remain unknown; however, DRP1 serine 616 (S616) phosphorylation is likely involved. Although it is clear that nitrosative stress caused by peroxynitrite has a role in AD, effective antioxidant therapies are lacking. Cerium oxide nanoparticles, or nanoceria, switch between their Ce3+ and Ce4+ states and are able to scavenge superoxide anions, hydrogen peroxide and peroxynitrite. Therefore, nanoceria might protect against neurodegeneration. Here we report that nanoceria are internalized by neurons and accumulate at the mitochondrial outer membrane and plasma membrane. Furthermore, nanoceria reduce levels of reactive nitrogen species and protein tyrosine nitration in neurons exposed to peroxynitrite. Importantly, nanoceria reduce endogenous peroxynitrite and Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation, DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation and neuronal cell death.Nitric oxide (NO) is a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator required for learning and memory.1 NO is generated by NO synthases, a group of enzymes that produce NO from L-arginine. In addition to its normal role in physiology, NO is implicated in pathophysiology. When overproduced, NO combines with superoxide anions (O2·), byproducts of aerobic metabolism and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, to form peroxynitrite anions (ONOO) that are highly reactive and neurotoxic. Accumulation of these reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), known as oxidative and nitrosative stress, respectively, is a common feature of aging, neurodegeneration and Alzheimer''s disease (AD).1Nitrosative stress caused by peroxynitrite has a critical role in the etiology and pathogenesis of AD.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Peroxynitrite is implicated in the formation of the two hallmarks of AD, Aβ aggregates and neurofibrillary tangles containing hyperphosphorylated Tau protein.1, 4, 7 In addition, peroxynitrite promotes the nitrotyrosination of presenilin 1, the catalytic subunit of the γ-secretase complex, which shifts production of Aβ to amyloid beta (Aβ)42 and increases the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, ultimately resulting in an increased propensity for aggregation and neurotoxicity.5 Furthermore, nitration of Aβ tyrosine 10 enhances its aggregation.6 Peroxynitrite can also modify enzymes, such as triosephosphate isomerase,4 and activate kinases, including Jun amino-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, which enhance neuronal cell death.8, 9 Moreover, peroxynitrite can trigger the release of free metals such as Zn2+ from intracellular stores with consequent inhibition of mitochondrial function and enhancement of neuronal cell death.10, 11, 12 Finally, peroxynitrite can irreversibly inhibit complexes I and IV of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.11, 13Because mitochondria have a critical role in neurons as energy producers to fuel vital processes such as synaptic transmission and axonal transport,14 and mitochondrial dysfunction is a well-documented and early event in AD,15 it is important to consider how peroxynitrite and nitrosative stress affect mitochondria. Although the ultimate cause of mitochondrial dysfunction in AD remains unclear, an imbalance in mitochondrial fission and fusion is one possibility.1, 14, 16, 17, 18 Notably, peroxynitrite, N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation and Aβ can induce mitochondrial fragmentation by activating mitochondrial fission and/or inhibiting fusion.16 Mitochondrial fission and fusion is regulated by large GTPases of the dynamin family, including dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) that is required for mitochondrial division,19 and inhibition of mitochondrial division by overexpression of the GTPase-defective DRP1K38A mutant provides protection against peroxynitrite-, NMDA- and Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death.16The exact mechanism of peroxynitrite-induced mitochondrial fragmentation remains unclear. A recent report suggested that S-nitrosylation of DRP1 at cysteine 644 increases DRP1 activity and is the cause of peroxynitrite-induced mitochondrial fragmentation in AD;20 however, the work remains controversial, suggesting that alternative pathways might be involved.21 For example, peroxynitrite also causes rapid DRP1 S616 phosphorylation that promotes its translocation to mitochondria and organelle division.21, 22 In mitotic cells, DRP1 S616 phosphorylation is mediated by Cdk1/cyclinB1 and synchronizes mitochondrial division with cell division.23 Interestingly, DRP1 is S616 hyperphosphorylated in AD brains, suggesting that this event might contribute to mitochondrial fragmentation in the disease.21, 22 A recent report indicates that Cdk5/p35 is responsible for DRP1 S616 phosphorylation,24 and notably aberrant Cdk5/p35/p25 signaling is associated with AD pathogenesis.25 Thus, we explored here the possible role of DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation in Aβ- and peroxynitrite-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation.Under normal conditions, accumulated mitochondrial superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) can be neutralized by superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase. Nitrosative stress in aging and AD might be explained by a loss of antioxidant enzymes. Previous studies suggest that expression of SOD subtypes is decreased in the human AD brain.26, 27 Furthermore, SOD1 deletion in a mouse model of AD increased the burden of amyloid plaques.26 By contrast, overexpression of SOD2 in a mouse model of AD decreased the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and alleviated memory deficits.28, 29 There is currently a lack of antioxidants that can effectively quench superoxide anions, H2O2 or peroxynitrite and provide lasting effects. Cerium is a rare earth element and cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles, or nanoceria, shuttle between their 3+ or 4+ states. Oxidation of Ce4+ to Ce3+ causes oxygen vacancies and defects on the surface of the crystalline lattice structure of the nanoparticles, generating a cage for redox reactions to occur.30 Accordingly, nanoceria mimic the catalytic activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD31, 32 and catalase,33 and are able to neutralize peroxynitrite.34 Because of these antioxidant properties, we hypothesized that nanoceria could detoxify peroxynitrite and protect against Aβ-induced DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation, mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death.  相似文献   

7.
Disrupting particular mitochondrial fission and fusion proteins leads to the death of specific neuronal populations; however, the normal functions of mitochondrial fission in neurons are poorly understood, especially in vivo, which limits the understanding of mitochondrial changes in disease. Altered activity of the central mitochondrial fission protein dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) may contribute to the pathophysiology of several neurologic diseases. To study Drp1 in a neuronal population affected by Alzheimer''s disease (AD), stroke, and seizure disorders, we postnatally deleted Drp1 from CA1 and other forebrain neurons in mice (CamKII-Cre, Drp1lox/lox (Drp1cKO)). Although most CA1 neurons survived for more than 1 year, their synaptic transmission was impaired, and Drp1cKO mice had impaired memory. In Drp1cKO cell bodies, we observed marked mitochondrial swelling but no change in the number of mitochondria in individual synaptic terminals. Using ATP FRET sensors, we found that cultured neurons lacking Drp1 (Drp1KO) could not maintain normal levels of mitochondrial-derived ATP when energy consumption was increased by neural activity. These deficits occurred specifically at the nerve terminal, but not the cell body, and were sufficient to impair synaptic vesicle cycling. Although Drp1KO increased the distance between axonal mitochondria, mitochondrial-derived ATP still decreased similarly in Drp1KO boutons with and without mitochondria. This indicates that mitochondrial-derived ATP is rapidly dispersed in Drp1KO axons, and that the deficits in axonal bioenergetics and function are not caused by regional energy gradients. Instead, loss of Drp1 compromises the intrinsic bioenergetic function of axonal mitochondria, thus revealing a mechanism by which disrupting mitochondrial dynamics can cause dysfunction of axons.Mitochondrial dynamics – the balance between mitochondrial fission and fusion – regulates mitochondrial quality control by segregating poorly functioning mitochondria for degradation while mixing the contents of healthy mitochondria.1, 2 In neurons, fission uniquely facilitates movement of mitochondria down narrow distal axons.3, 4 Disruptions of this movement, and of other neuron-specific functions, may explain why systemic mutations in mitochondrial fusion and fission proteins specifically cause death of neurons. However, the roles and requirements of these proteins also differ between neuronal types.1 For example, mutations in the fusion protein optic atrophy 1 cause degeneration of retinal ganglion neurons,5 and mutations in the fusion protein mitofusin-2 or the fission protein ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein 1 cause peripheral neuropathy (Charcot-Marie-Tooth types 2A and 4A6, 7).There are several potential reasons why specific neurons have unique requirements for fission–fusion proteins. First, the functions of these proteins may be more critical in vulnerable neuronal populations. Recently, we showed that most midbrain DA neurons are uniquely vulnerable to loss of the central mitochondrial fission protein dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1),4 a GTPase recruited to fission sites on the outer mitochondrial membrane.1 Loss of Drp1 depletes axonal mitochondria, which is followed by axonal degeneration and neuronal death. However, a subpopulation of midbrain DA neurons survive, despite losing their axonal mitochondria, suggesting that they have lower needs for energy or other mitochondrial functions in their axons.4 Do unique requirements for mitochondrial dynamics underlie differential neuronal vulnerability? Do resistant neurons compensate with other fission or fusion mechanisms? Do the functions of fission differ between neurons? Notably, Drp1 may also have mitochondria-independent functions in synaptic vesicle release.8 Addressing these issues could help elucidate the physiological functions of mitochondrial dynamics in the nervous system and reveal how shifts in the fission–fusion balance contribute to selective neuronal death in neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington''s disease, Parkinson''s disease and Alzheimer''s disease (AD),1, 4 and in other neurologic disorders, including stroke and epilepsy.9, 10, 11To understand mitochondrial dynamics, it would be useful to know why mitochondrial fission is needed in the nervous system in the first place, and how loss of fission affects mitochondrial functions in specific cell types. Notably, Drp1 knockout did not change respiration or ATP levels in resuspended mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs),12, 13 indicating that mitochondrial fission is not required for respiration in these cells. However, neuronal respiration may be more sensitive to Drp1 loss. Indeed, Drp1 loss markedly decreased the number of mitochondria in axons and the cell body in midbrain DA neurons in vivo,4 and reduced staining of complex I and IV activity in cerebellar neurons in vivo.14 However, it is unclear whether these changes translate into decreased ATP levels in neurons and, if so, whether this decrease compromises neuronal function. Furthermore, Drp1 loss caused cell death in cerebellar and most midbrain DA neurons,4, 14 which challenges our ability to dissociate the specific effects of Drp1 loss on mitochondrial function from other non-specific changes that accompany cell death.To learn how disrupting mitochondrial fission contributes to selective neurodegeneration, we studied the function of Drp1 in CA1 hippocampal neurons and its role in mitochondrial bioenergetics. Surprisingly, despite losing Drp1, most CA1 neurons survived for more than 1 year in vivo, although their function was compromised, leading to deficits in synaptic transmission and memory. To begin to understand how loss of Drp1 causes neuronal dysfunction, we examined the role of Drp1 in mitochondrial bioenergetics. We found that Drp1 is required to maintain normal mitochondrial-derived ATP levels specifically in axons (but not the cell body), and that the loss of this function is unrelated to the distribution of mitochondria within axons.  相似文献   

8.
Mitochondrial fission and fusion are essential processes in the maintenance of the skeletal muscle function. The contribution of these processes to muscle development has not been properly investigated in vivo because of the early lethality of the models generated so far. To define the role of mitochondrial fission in muscle development and repair, we have generated a transgenic mouse line that overexpresses the fission-inducing protein Drp1 specifically in skeletal muscle. These mice displayed a drastic impairment in postnatal muscle growth, with reorganisation of the mitochondrial network and reduction of mtDNA quantity, without the deficiency of mitochondrial bioenergetics. Importantly we found that Drp1 overexpression activates the stress-induced PKR/eIF2α/Fgf21 pathway thus leading to an attenuated protein synthesis and downregulation of the growth hormone pathway. These results reveal for the first time how mitochondrial network dynamics influence muscle growth and shed light on aspects of muscle physiology relevant in human muscle pathologies.Skeletal muscle growth and mitochondrial metabolism are intimately linked. In myogenic precursor cells, mitochondrial mass, mtDNA copy number and mitochondrial respiration increase after the onset of myogenic differentiation;1, 2 furthermore, postnatal development of fast-twitch muscle is accompanied by an increase in mtDNA copy number3 and muscle regeneration is impaired when mitochondrial protein synthesis is inhibited with chloramphenicol.2, 4 These observations suggest that a change in the mitochondrial metabolism is necessary for proper muscle development. During myogenesis and postnatal development, the shape of mitochondria is also remodelled:3, 5, 6 in an elegant mouse model with fluorescent mitochondria it was shown that in young mice mitochondria of the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle are shaped as elongated tubules oriented along the long axis of the muscle fibre, whereas in adult mice mitochondria are punctuated and organised into doublets.1Mitochondrial network morphology is controlled by the balance between fusion and fission. In mammals, three large GTPases are involved in mitochondrial fusion: mitofusins 1 and 2 (Mfn1 and Mfn2) participate in the early steps of mitochondrial outer-membrane fusion, whereas the optic atrophy 1 protein (Opa1) is essential for inner-membrane fusion.7 Mitochondrial fission is mediated by the evolutionarily conserved dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1).8 In humans, mutations in Mfn2 and Opa1 cause two neurodegenerative diseases – Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 2 A and dominant optic atrophy, respectively – and a mutation in Drp1 has been linked to neonatal lethality with multisystem failure.9, 10, 11 Moreover, Drp1 expression was reported to increase in a model of cachexia12 and to contribute to muscle insulin resistance in obese and type 2 diabetic mice.13, 14The importance of mitochondrial dynamics in muscle physiology has become increasingly clear. In skeletal muscle, mitochondria undergo fusion to share matrix content in order to support excitation–contraction coupling.15 The mitochondrial network is remodelled in atrophic conditions, and denervation and expression of fission machinery in adult myofibres is sufficient to cause muscle wasting.16 Moreover, mice lacking Mfn1 and 2 in fast-twitch muscles exhibit drastic growth defects and muscle atrophy before dying at 6–8 weeks of age.3 Animal models in which mitochondrial fission proteins are manipulated during skeletal muscle development are not yet available, but in vitro data demonstrate that regulation of Drp1 is critical for myogenesis: myoblasts differentiation requires nitric oxide-dependent inhibition of Drp16 and pharmacological inhibition of Drp1 activity impairs myogenic differentiation.17To explore in vivo the role of Drp1 and mitochondrial shape in the developing muscle, we generated a transgenic mouse line specifically overexpressing Drp1 in skeletal muscle during myogenesis. These mice display strong impairments in mitochondrial network shape and in muscle growth. We show that the mechanism responsible for the growth defect involves inhibition of protein synthesis and activation of the Atf4 pathway.  相似文献   

9.
10.
11.
Mitochondria are key organelles for the maintenance of life and death of the cell, and their morphology is controlled by continual and balanced fission and fusion dynamics. A balance between these events is mandatory for normal mitochondrial and neuronal function, and emerging evidence indicates that mitochondria undergo extensive fission at an early stage during programmed cell death in several neurodegenerative diseases. A pathway for selective degradation of damaged mitochondria by autophagy, known as mitophagy, has been described, and is of particular importance to sustain neuronal viability. In the present work, we analyzed the effect of autophagy stimulation on mitochondrial function and dynamics in a model of remote degeneration after focal cerebellar lesion. We provided evidence that lesion of a cerebellar hemisphere causes mitochondria depolarization in axotomized precerebellar neurons associated with PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 accumulation and Parkin translocation to mitochondria, block of mitochondrial fusion by Mfn1 degradation, increase of calcineurin activity and dynamin-related protein 1 translocation to mitochondria, and consequent mitochondrial fission. Here we suggest that the observed neuroprotective effect of rapamycin is the result of a dual role: (1) stimulation of autophagy leading to damaged mitochondria removal and (2) enhancement of mitochondria fission to allow their elimination by mitophagy. The involvement of mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy in brain injury, especially in the context of remote degeneration after acute focal brain damage, has not yet been investigated, and these findings may offer new target for therapeutic intervention to improve functional outcomes following acute brain damage.Mitochondria are essential organelles for cell function and viability, and are central to several processes such as energy production, metabolism, calcium buffering, and life/death decisions.1 Neurons have a high and constant demand for mitochondrial metabolism, to maintain their functions, and contain many mitochondria throughout the cytoplasm, distributed to axons, presynaptic terminals, and dendritic shafts. Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles that continuously move and change shape. Their morphology is governed by the dynamic equilibrium between fusion and fission processes, both of which are mediated by evolutionarily conserved members of the dynamin family of large GTPases.2 Fusion between the outer mitochondrial membranes (OMMs) is mediated by membrane-anchored mitofusins (Mfn1 and Mfn2), whereas that between inner mitochondrial membranes is controlled by optic atrophy 1.3 Mitochondrial fission is regulated by dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) and fission protein 1 (Fis1).4 Drp1 is predominantly expressed in the cytoplasm and is recruited to mitochondria, where it associates with Fis1 to form a complex that constricts the inner and outer membranes, allowing mitochondria to divide.5, 6Mitochondrial dynamics are crucial to the maintenance of mitochondrial function and neuron survival, as evidenced by findings that pathological imbalances between fusion and fission events develop in many neurodegenerative disorders and brain trauma.7, 8 Moreover, mitochondrial fission regulates organelle shape and mediates mitochondria-dependent cell death.9 The release of proapoptotic factors, such as cytochrome c (with consequent formation of the apoptosome and caspase activation), from depolarized mitochondria into the cytosol is a significant event in the induction of apoptosis and is associated with Drp1-mediated fragmentation of the mitochondrial network.10The elimination of dysfunctional mitochondria is therefore a key process with regard to the viability of neurons (and other cell types). Damaged mitochondria that accelerate cell death are removed through autophagy, an evolutionarily conserved lysosome-mediated degradation pathway that maintains the balance between organelle biogenesis, protein synthesis, and degradation of cellular components.11Mitochondria can be selectively degraded by autophagy – a pathway known as mitophagy.12 Priming of damaged mitochondria can involve several mechanisms, one of which is triggered by Parkin, a cytosolic E3 ubiquitin ligase that is mutated in familial forms of Parkinson''s disease (PD).13 Parkin recruitment to impaired mitochondria requires the kinase activity of PINK1 (PTEN-induced putative kinase 1),14, 15, 16 a serine/threonine kinase that is also mutated in other autosomal recessive forms of PD.17 PINK1 levels are very low in polarized mitochondria, to prevent mitophagy of healthy mitochondria; in contrast, when mitochondria are depolarized, full-length PINK1 accumulates rapidly at damaged organelles, crossing the OMM and acting as cellular sensors of damaged mitochondria.15 PINK1 then recruits Parkin to the mitochondrial surface, where it ubiquitinates several OMM proteins, which in turn recruit other proteins to initiate mitophagy.18 Mfn1 is a direct substrate of Parkin and its degradation has been suggested to prevent the fusion of damaged and healthy mitochondria.19 Drp1-dependent fission of mitochondria is also a crucial event that effects their degradation through mitophagy and the inhibition of fission specifically prevents mitochondrial autophagy.20In this study, we examined mitochondrial function and its relationship with autophagy machinery in an in vivo model of acute focal CNS (central nervous system) lesion, focusing on remote changes that are induced by hemicerebellectomy (HCb). Unilateral HCb is a suitable model in which axonal damage-induced neuronal death mechanisms can be studied.21, 22 In this model, neuronal degeneration is caused by target deprivation and axonal damage of contralateral precerebellar nuclei of the inferior olive and pontine nuclei. Remote damage is a multifactorial phenomenon in which many components become active in specific time frames21 and is significant in determining the overall clinical outcome in many CNS pathologies, including spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury.23, 24, 25Recently, we demonstrated that autophagy is activated in axotomized neurons after HCb, subsequent to cytochrome c release from mitochondria.26 Further, rapamycin-enhanced autophagy has neuroprotective effects, reducing neuronal death and improving functional recovery. In this study, we examined mitochondrial dynamics and function in axotomized neurons after HCb in mice and analysed the effects of rapamycin on selective elimination of damaged mitochondria.  相似文献   

12.
Mitophagy mediates clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria, and represents one type of mitochondrial quality control, which is essential for optimal mitochondrial bioenergetics. p32, a chaperone-like protein, is crucial for maintaining mitochondrial membrane potential and oxidative phosphorylation. However, the relationship between p32 and mitochondrial homeostasis has not been addressed. Here, we identified p32 as a key regulator of ULK1 stability by forming complex with ULK1. p32 depletion potentiated K48-linked but impaired K63-linked polyubiquitination of ULK1, leading to proteasome-mediated degradation of ULK1. As a result, silencing p32 profoundly impaired starvation-induced autophagic flux and the clearance of damaged mitochondria caused by mitochondrial uncoupler. Importantly, restoring ULK1 expression in p32-depleted cells rescued autophagy and mitophagy defects. Our findings highlight a cytoprotective role of p32 under starvation conditions by regulating ULK1 stability, and uncover a crucial role of the p32–ULK1-autophagy axis in coordinating stress response, cell survival and mitochondrial homeostasis.Mitophagy is a selective form of autophagy by which mitochondria are degraded in autolysosomes. p32 is a critical regulator of mitochondrial bioenergetics.1 It primarily localizes to the mitochondrial matrix, but has also been reported to be present in other subcellular locations.2, 3, 4, 5 Many human tumors exhibit higher p32 expression levels than their nonmalignant counterpart tissues.6, 7, 8, 9 Depleting p32 in human cancer cells strongly shifts their metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis.1 Consistently, p32 knockout causes mid-gestation lethality of knockout embryos and defects in oxidative phosphorylation. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) generated from p32 knockout embryos exhibited impaired ATP production and reduced mitochondrial membrane potential, which is in agreement with the observation that p32 silencing leads to increased mitochondrial fragmentation.10, 11 Notably, p32 was found to form protein complex with a variety of molecules7, 12, 13 and has been suggested that it may act as a multifunctional chaperone protein.12, 13, 14ULK1 has a crucial role in mitophagy induction.15 Despite the pivotal role of ULK1 in mitochondrial clearance, little is known as how ULK1 itself is regulated. ULK1 is a relatively stable protein and is subject to proteasome-mediated degradation. Post-translational modifications including K63-linked ubiquitylation16, 17 and phosphorylation18, 19, 20 have been reported to modulate the rates of ULK1 turnover and kinase activity in different cellular contexts. Hsp90 and Cdc37 have been shown to regulate ULK1 stability and activity by forming complex with ULK1, which subsequently influences Atg13-mediated mitophagy.21 Here, we found p32 regulates ULK1 stability by forming protein complex with ULK1. The interaction between ULK1 and p32 is crucial for maintaining the steady-state levels and activity of ULK1. We further show that p32 ablation results in a defect in autophagy in EBSS-starved cells, and impairs clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria in cells exposed to mitochondrial uncoupler. Importantly, these autophagy and mitophagy defects can be restored by re-introducing ULK1 into p32-deficient cells, demonstrating ULK1 functions as a crucial downstream effector of p32.  相似文献   

13.
14.
Caspases and the cytotoxic lymphocyte protease granzyme B (GB) induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, loss of transmembrane potential and mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). Whether ROS are required for GB-mediated apoptosis and how GB induces ROS is unclear. Here, we found that GB induces cell death in an ROS-dependent manner, independently of caspases and MOMP. GB triggers ROS increase in target cell by directly attacking the mitochondria to cleave NDUFV1, NDUFS1 and NDUFS2 subunits of the NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase complex I inside mitochondria. This leads to mitocentric ROS production, loss of complex I and III activity, disorganization of the respiratory chain, impaired mitochondrial respiration and loss of the mitochondrial cristae junctions. Furthermore, we have also found that GB-induced mitocentric ROS are necessary for optimal apoptogenic factor release, rapid DNA fragmentation and lysosomal rupture. Interestingly, scavenging the ROS delays and reduces many of the features of GB-induced death. Consequently, GB-induced ROS significantly promote apoptosis.To induce cell death, human granzyme B (GB) activates effector caspase-3 or acts directly on key caspase substrates, such as the proapoptotic BH3 only Bcl-2 family member Bid, inhibitor of caspase-activated DNase (ICAD), poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1), lamin B, nuclear mitotic apparatus protein 1 (NUMA1), catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) and tubulin.1, 2, 3 Consequently, caspase inhibitors have little effect on human GB-mediated cell death and DNA fragmentation.2 GB causes reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, dissipation of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential (ΔΨm) and MOMP, which leads to the release of apoptogenic factors such as cytochrome c (Cyt c), HtrA2/Omi, endonuclease G (Endo G), Smac/Diablo and apoptosis-inducing factor, from the mitochondrial intermembrane space to the cytosol.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Interestingly, cells deficient for Bid, Bax and Bak are still sensitive to human GB-induced cell death,5, 11, 12, 13 suggesting that human GB targets the mitochondria in another way that needs to be characterized. Altogether, much attention has been focused on the importance of MOMP in the execution of GB-mediated cell death, leaving unclear whether ROS production is a bystander effect or essential to the execution of GB-induced apoptosis. The mitochondrial NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase complex I is a key determinant in steady-state ROS production. This 1 MDa complex, composed of 44 subunits,14 couples the transfer of two electrons from NADH to ubiquinone with the translocation of four protons to generate the ΔΨm. The importance of ROS has been previously demonstrated for caspase-3 and granzyme A (GA) pathways through the cleavage of NDUFS1 and NDUFS3, respectively.15, 16, 17, 18 GA induces cell death in a Bcl-2-insensitive and caspase- and MOMP-independent manner that has all the morphological features of apoptosis.1, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 As GA and GB cell death pathways are significantly different, whether ROS are also critical for GB still need to be tested. Here, we show that GB induces ROS-dependent apoptosis by directly attacking the mitochondria in a caspase-independent manner to cleave NDUFS1, NDUFS2 and NDUFV1 in complex I. Consequently, GB inhibits electron transport chain (ETC) complex I and III activities, mitochondrial ROS production is triggered and mitochondrial respiration is compromised. Interestingly, MOMP is not required for GB to cleave the mitochondrial complex I subunits and ROS production. Moreover, GB action on complex I disrupts the organization of the respiratory chain and triggers the loss of the mitochondrial cristae junctions. We also show that GB-mediated mitocentric ROS are necessary for proper apoptogenic factor release from the mitochondria to the cytosol and for the rapid DNA fragmentation, both hallmarks of apoptosis. Moreover, GB-induced ROS are necessary for lysosomal membrane rupture. Thus, our work brings a new light to the GB pathway, showing that GB-mediated mitochondrial ROS are not adventitious waste of cell death, but essential mediators of apoptosis.  相似文献   

15.
16.
Multivesicular bodies (MVBs) are endocytic compartments that enclose intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) formed by inward budding from the limiting membrane of endosomes. In T lymphocytes, these ILV contain Fas ligand (FasL) and are secreted as ''lethal exosomes'' following activation-induced fusion of the MVB with the plasma membrane. Diacylglycerol (DAG) and diacylglycerol kinase α (DGKα) regulate MVB maturation and polarized traffic, as well as subsequent secretion of pro-apoptotic exosomes, but the molecular basis underlying these phenomena remains unclear. Here we identify protein kinase D (PKD) family members as DAG effectors involved in MVB genesis and secretion. We show that the inducible secretion of exosomes is enhanced when a constitutively active PKD1 mutant is expressed in T lymphocytes, whereas exosome secretion is impaired in PKD2-deficient mouse T lymphoblasts and in PKD1/3-null B cells. Analysis of PKD2-deficient T lymphoblasts showed the presence of large, immature MVB-like vesicles and demonstrated defects in cytotoxic activity and in activation-induced cell death. Using pharmacological and genetic tools, we show that DGKα regulates PKD1/2 subcellular localization and activation. Our studies demonstrate that PKD1/2 is a key regulator of MVB maturation and exosome secretion, and constitutes a mediator of the DGKα effect on MVB secretory traffic.Exosomes are nanovesicles that form as intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) inside multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and are then secreted by numerous cell types.1 ILVs are generated by inward budding of late endosome limiting membrane in a precisely regulated maturation process.2, 3 Two main pathways are involved in MVB maturation.4, 5 In addition to the ESCRT (endosomal complex required for traffic) proteins,6 there is increasing evidence that lipids such as lyso-bisphosphatidic acid (LBPA),7 ceramides8 and diacylglycerol (DAG)9 contribute to this membrane invagination process.Exosomes participate in many biological processes related to T-cell receptor (TCR)-triggered immune responses, including T lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity and activation-induced cell death (AICD), antigen presentation and intercellular miRNA exchange.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 The discovery of exosome involvement in these responses increased interest in the regulation of exosome biogenesis and secretory traffic, with special attention to the contribution of lipids such as ceramide and DAG, as well as DAG-binding proteins.14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 These studies suggest that positive and negative DAG regulators may control secretory traffic. By transforming DAG into phosphatidic acid (PA), diacylglycerol kinase α (DGKα) is essential for the negative control of DAG function in T lymphocytes.22 DGKα translocates transiently to the T-cell membrane after human muscarinic type 1 receptor (HM1R) triggering or to the immune synapse (IS) after TCR stimulation; at these subcellular locations, DGKα acts as a negative modulator of phospholipase C (PLC)-generated DAG.23, 24The secretory vesicle pathway involves several DAG-controlled checkpoints at which DGKα may act; these include vesicle formation and fission at the trans-Golgi network (TGN), MVB maturation, as well as their transport, docking and fusion to the plasma membrane.9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 The molecular components that regulate some of these trafficking processes include protein kinase D (PKD) family members.21 PKD1 activity, for instance, regulates fission of transport vesicles from TGN via direct interaction with the pre-existing DAG pool at this site.19 The cytosolic serine/threonine kinases PKD1, PKD2 and PKD3(ref. 21) are expressed in a wide range of cells, with PKD2 the most abundant isotype in T lymphocytes.25, 26 PKD have two DAG-binding domains (C1a and C1b) at the N terminus,21 which mediate PKD recruitment to cell membranes. Protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation at the PKD activation loop further promotes PKD autophosphorylation and activation.27Based on our previous studies showing DGKα regulation of DAG in MVB formation and exosome secretion,9, 14, 28 and the identification of PKD1/2 association to MVB,14 we hypothesized that DGKα control of DAG mediates these events, at least in part, through PKD. Here we explored whether, in addition to its role in vesicle fission from TGN,19 PKD regulates other steps in the DAG-controlled secretory traffic pathway. Using PKD-deficient cell models, we analyzed the role of PKD1/2 in MVB formation and function, and demonstrate their implication in exosome secretory traffic.  相似文献   

17.
Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death mediated by receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3. Necroptotic cell death contributes to the pathophysiology of several disorders involving tissue damage, including myocardial infarction, stroke and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, no inhibitors of necroptosis are currently in clinical use. Here we performed a phenotypic screen for small-molecule inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF)-induced necroptosis in Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD)-deficient Jurkat cells using a representative panel of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. We identified two anti-cancer agents, ponatinib and pazopanib, as submicromolar inhibitors of necroptosis. Both compounds inhibited necroptotic cell death induced by various cell death receptor ligands in human cells, while not protecting from apoptosis. Ponatinib and pazopanib abrogated phosphorylation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) upon TNF-α-induced necroptosis, indicating that both agents target a component upstream of MLKL. An unbiased chemical proteomic approach determined the cellular target spectrum of ponatinib, revealing key members of the necroptosis signaling pathway. We validated RIPK1, RIPK3 and transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) as novel, direct targets of ponatinib by using competitive binding, cellular thermal shift and recombinant kinase assays. Ponatinib inhibited both RIPK1 and RIPK3, while pazopanib preferentially targeted RIPK1. The identification of the FDA-approved drugs ponatinib and pazopanib as cellular inhibitors of necroptosis highlights them as potentially interesting for the treatment of pathologies caused or aggravated by necroptotic cell death.Programmed cell death has a crucial role in a variety of biological processes ranging from normal tissue development to diverse pathological conditions.1, 2 Necroptosis is a form of regulated cell death that has been shown to occur during pathogen infection or sterile injury-induced inflammation in conditions where apoptosis signaling is compromised.3, 4, 5, 6 Given that many viruses have developed strategies to circumvent apoptotic cell death, necroptosis constitutes an important, pro-inflammatory back-up mechanism that limits viral spread in vivo.7, 8, 9 In contrast, in the context of sterile inflammation, necroptotic cell death contributes to disease pathology, outlining potential benefits of therapeutic intervention.10 Necroptosis can be initiated by death receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily,11 Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3),12 TLR4,13 DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors14 or interferon receptors.15 Downstream signaling is subsequently conveyed via RIPK116 or TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β,8, 17 and converges on RIPK3-mediated13, 18, 19, 20 activation of MLKL.21 Phosphorylated MLKL triggers membrane rupture,22, 23, 24, 25, 26 releasing pro-inflammatory cellular contents to the extracellular space.27 Studies using the RIPK1 inhibitor necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) 28 or RIPK3-deficient mice have established a role for necroptosis in the pathophysiology of pancreatitis,19 artherosclerosis,29 retinal cell death,30 ischemic organ damage and ischemia-reperfusion injury in both the kidney31 and the heart.32 Moreover, allografts from RIPK3-deficient mice are better protected from rejection, suggesting necroptosis inhibition as a therapeutic option to improve transplant outcome.33 Besides Nec-1, several tool compounds inhibiting different pathway members have been described,12, 16, 21, 34, 35 however, no inhibitors of necroptosis are available for clinical use so far.2, 10 In this study we screened a library of FDA approved drugs for the precise purpose of identifying already existing and generally safe chemical agents that could be used as necroptosis inhibitors. We identified the two structurally distinct kinase inhibitors pazopanib and ponatinib as potent blockers of necroptosis targeting the key enzymes RIPK1/3.  相似文献   

18.
19.
A 5.5-y-old intact male cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fasicularis) presented with inappetence and weight loss 57 d after heterotopic heart and thymus transplantation while receiving an immunosuppressant regimen consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone to prevent graft rejection. A serum chemistry panel, a glycated hemoglobin test, and urinalysis performed at presentation revealed elevated blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (727 mg/dL and 10.1%, respectively), glucosuria, and ketonuria. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed, and insulin therapy was initiated immediately. The macaque was weaned off the immunosuppressive therapy as his clinical condition improved and stabilized. Approximately 74 d after discontinuation of the immunosuppressants, the blood glucose normalized, and the insulin therapy was stopped. The animal''s blood glucose and HbA1c values have remained within normal limits since this time. We suspect that our macaque experienced new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, a condition that is commonly observed in human transplant patients but not well described in NHP. To our knowledge, this report represents the first documented case of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation in a cynomolgus macaque.Abbreviations: NODAT, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantationNew-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT, formerly known as posttransplantation diabetes mellitus) is an important consequence of solid-organ transplantation in humans.7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42 A variety of risk factors have been identified including increased age, sex (male prevalence), elevated pretransplant fasting plasma glucose levels, and immunosuppressive therapy.7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42 The relationship between calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporin, and the development of NODAT is widely recognized in human medicine.7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42 Cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fasicularis) are a commonly used NHP model in organ transplantation research. Cases of natural and induced diabetes of cynomolgus monkeys have been described in the literature;14,43,45 however, NODAT in a macaque model of solid-organ transplantation has not been reported previously to our knowledge.  相似文献   

20.
To grant faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit until mitotic spindle assembly. An exceedingly prolonged mitosis, however, promotes cell death and by this means antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs), that impair spindle assembly, are believed to kill cancer cells. Despite malformed spindles, cancer cells can, however, slip through SAC, exit mitosis prematurely and resist killing. We show here that the Fcp1 phosphatase and Wee1, the cyclin B-dependent kinase (cdk) 1 inhibitory kinase, play a role for this slippage/resistance mechanism. During AMCD-induced prolonged mitosis, Fcp1-dependent Wee1 reactivation lowered cdk1 activity, weakening SAC-dependent mitotic arrest and leading to mitosis exit and survival. Conversely, genetic or chemical Wee1 inhibition strengthened the SAC, further extended mitosis, reduced antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 to a minimum and potentiated killing in several, AMCD-treated cancer cell lines and primary human adult lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Thus, the Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 (FWC) axis affects SAC robustness and AMCDs sensitivity.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit to coordinate anaphase onset with spindle assembly. To this end, SAC inhibits the ubiquitin ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) to prevent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor securin and cyclin B, the major mitotic cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1) activator, until spindle assembly.1 However, by yet poorly understood mechanisms, exceedingly prolonging mitosis translates into cell death induction.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Although mechanistic details are still missing on how activation of cell death pathways is linked to mitosis duration, prolongation of mitosis appears crucial for the ability of antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs) to kill cancer cells.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 These drugs, targeting microtubules, impede mitotic spindle assembly and delay mitosis exit by chronically activating the SAC. Use of these drugs is limited, however, by toxicity and resistance. A major mechanism for resistance is believed to reside in the ability of cancer cells to slip through the SAC and exit mitosis prematurely despite malformed spindles, thus resisting killing by limiting mitosis duration.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Under the AMCD treatment, cells either die in mitosis or exit mitosis, slipping through the SAC, without or abnormally dividing.2, 3, 4 Cells that exit mitosis either die at later stages or survive and stop dividing or proliferate, giving rise to resistance.2, 3, 4 Apart from a role for p53, what dictates cell fate is still unknown; however, it appears that the longer mitosis is protracted, the higher the chances for cell death pathway activation are.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Although SAC is not required per se for killing,6 preventing SAC adaptation should improve the efficacy of AMCD by increasing mitosis duration.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Therefore, further understanding of the mechanisms by which cells override SAC may help to improve the current AMCD therapy. Several kinases are known to activate and sustain SAC, and cdk1 itself appears to be of primary relevance.1, 8, 9 By studying mitosis exit and SAC resolution, we recently reported a role for the Fcp1 phosphatase to bring about cdk1 inactivation.10, 11 Among Fcp1 targets, we identified cyclin degradation pathway components, such as Cdc20, an APC/C co-activator, USP44, a deubiquitinating enzyme, and Wee1.10, 11 Wee1 is a crucial kinase that controls the G2 phase by performing inhibitory phosphorylation of cdk1 at tyr-15 (Y15-cdk1). Wee1 is also in a feedback relationship with cdk1 itself that, in turn, can phosphorylate and inhibit Wee1 in an autoamplification loop to promote the G2-to-M phase transition.12 At mitosis exit, Fcp1 dephosphorylated Wee1 at threonine 239, a cdk1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation, to dampen down the cdk1 autoamplification loop, and Cdc20 and USP44, to promote APC/C-dependent cyclin B degradation.10, 11, 12 In this study we analysed the Fcp1 relevance in SAC adaptation and AMCD sensitivity.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号