LFA-1 Regulates CD8+ T Cell Activation via T Cell Receptor-mediated and LFA-1-mediated Erk1/2 Signal Pathways

LFA-1 regulates T cell activation and signal transduction through the immunological synapse. T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation rapidly activates LFA-1, which provides unique LFA-1-dependent signals to promote T cell activation. However, the detailed molecular pathways that regulate these processes and the precise mechanism by which LFA-1 contributes to TCR activation remain unclear. We found LFA-1 directly participates in Erk1/2 signaling upon TCR stimulation in CD8⁺ T cells. The presence of LFA-1, not ligand binding, is required for the TCR-mediated Erk1/2 signal pathway. LFA-1-deficient T cells have defects in sustained Erk1/2 signaling and TCR/CD3 clustering, which subsequently prevents MTOC reorientation, cell cycle progression, and mitosis. LFA-1 regulates the TCR-mediated Erk1/2 signal pathway in the context of immunological synapse for recruitment and amplification of the Erk1/2 signal. In addition, LFA-1 ligation with ICAM-1 generates an additional Erk1/2 signal, which synergizes with the existing TCR-mediated Erk1/2 signal to enhance T cell activation. Thus, LFA-1 contributes to CD8⁺ T cell activation through two distinct signal pathways. We demonstrated that the function of LFA-1 is to enhance TCR signaling through the immunological synapse and deliver distinct signals in CD8⁺ T cell activation.Leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1)² plays an important role in regulating leukocyte adhesion and T cell activation (1, 2). LFA-1 consists of the αL (CD11a) and β2 (CD18) subunits. The ligands for LFA-1 include intercellular adhesion molecular-1 (ICAM-1), ICAM-2, and ICAM-3 (3). LFA-1 participates in the formation of the immunological synapse, which regulates T cell activation synergistically with TCR engagement. The immunological synapse is a specialized structure that forms between the T cell and the APC or target cell (1, 2, 4). The function of the immunological synapse is to facilitate T cell activation and signal transduction. Mice deficient in LFA-1 (CD11a KO) have defects in leukocyte adhesion, lymphocyte proliferation, and tumor rejection (5–7).Upon TCR stimulation, the nascent immunological synapse is initiated with surface receptor clustering and cytoskeleton rearrangement, then followed by mature synapse formation after prolonged stimulation (8, 9). In the mature immunological synapse, LFA-1 forms a ring-like pattern at the peripheral supramolecular activation cluster (pSMAC), which surrounds the central supramolecular activation cluster (cSMAC) containing TCR/CD3/lipid rafts (10, 11). The structure of the mature synapse is stable for hours and thought to be important for sustained TCR signaling (12–14). LFA-1 functions via pSMAC to stabilize the cSMAC and is associated with the induction of T cell proliferation, cytokine production, and lytic granule migration toward cSMAC (1, 15). Although LFA-1-containing pSMAC is self-evident in lipid bilayer systems and cell lines, whether it is required for T cell activation under physiological conditions remains controversial (15).TCR stimulation rapidly induces the functional activity of LFA-1, which then provides unique LFA-1-dependent signals to promote T cell activation (16). The process can be divided into two steps. First, the intracellular signaling from TCR regulating LFA-1 activation is known as “inside-out” signaling; second, activated LFA-1, as a signaling receptor, can feedback to transduce the intracellular signal, the “outside-in” signaling (1, 17). It is widely accepted that TCR stimulation activates LFA-1 through affinity and/or avidity regulation, as supported by increased adhesion to ICAM-1 and pSMAC formation (16, 17). The “inside-out” signal process has been investigated extensively (18–21). The TCR proximal signal molecules, Lck, ZAP-70, and PI3K, are known to be important for TCR signaling to LFA-1 activation (22–26). The molecular mechanisms of LFA-1 “outside-in” signaling have been explored only recently. Perez et al. (27) have demonstrated that LFA-1 and ICAM-1 ligation activates the downstream Erk1/2 MAPK signaling pathway upon TCR stimulation, which ultimately leads to the qualitative modulation of CD4⁺ T cell activation through distinct LFA-1-dependent signals. Another recent study provided compelling evidence that LFA-1 reshapes the Ras MAPK pathway downstream of TCR (28). However, the detailed molecular pathways that regulate these processes are poorly defined. Especially, the evidence in support of a distinctive role for LFA-1 in the T cell signaling pathway has lagged behind; whether the function of LFA-1 is to enhance TCR signaling through the immunological synapse and/or deliver distinct signal in T cell activation and whether LFA-1 is indispensable for or merely assists the existing TCR signal pathway. Furthermore, whether and how TCR proximal signal molecules regulate LFA-1 function remains unknown. Further studies are required to understand the LFA-1 and TCR signaling network.In this study, we found that LFA-1 directly participates in CD8⁺ T cell activation. Upon TCR stimulation, LFA-1 regulates both TCR-mediated and LFA-1-mediated Erk1/2 signal pathways. First, the presence of LFA-1, not ligand binding, is required for the sustained Erk1/2 signaling and TCR/CD3 clustering on the surface of CD8⁺ T cells, subsequently leading to MTOC reorientation, cell cycle progression, and mitosis. Second, LFA-1 ligation with ICAM-1 enhances Erk1/2 signaling, which promotes T cell activation with increased IL-2 production and cell proliferation. This LFA-1-mediated Erk1/2 signal pathway integrates with the existing TCR-mediated Erk1/2 signal pathway to enhance T cell activation.     

CD4 Glycoprotein Degradation Induced by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vpu Protein Requires the Function of Proteasomes and the Ubiquitin-Conjugating Pathway

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vpu gene encodes a type I anchored integral membrane phosphoprotein with two independent functions. First, it regulates virus release from a post-endoplasmic reticulum (ER) compartment by an ion channel activity mediated by its transmembrane anchor. Second, it induces the selective down regulation of host cell receptor proteins (CD4 and major histocompatibility complex class I molecules) in a process involving its phosphorylated cytoplasmic tail. In the present work, we show that the Vpu-induced proteolysis of nascent CD4 can be completely blocked by peptide aldehydes that act as competitive inhibitors of proteasome function and also by lactacystin, which blocks proteasome activity by covalently binding to the catalytic β subunits of proteasomes. The sensitivity of Vpu-induced CD4 degradation to proteasome inhibitors paralleled the inhibition of proteasome degradation of a model ubiquitinated substrate. Characterization of CD4-associated oligosaccharides indicated that CD4 rescued from Vpu-induced degradation by proteasome inhibitors is exported from the ER to the Golgi complex. This finding suggests that retranslocation of CD4 from the ER to the cytosol may be coupled to its proteasomal degradation. CD4 degradation mediated by Vpu does not require the ER chaperone calnexin and is dependent on an intact ubiquitin-conjugating system. This was demonstrated by inhibition of CD4 degradation (i) in cells expressing a thermally inactivated form of the ubiquitin-activating enzyme E₁ or (ii) following expression of a mutant form of ubiquitin (Lys₄₈ mutated to Arg₄₈) known to compromise ubiquitin targeting by interfering with the formation of polyubiquitin complexes. CD4 degradation was also prevented by altering the four Lys residues in its cytosolic domain to Arg, suggesting a role for ubiquitination of one or more of these residues in the process of degradation. The results clearly demonstrate a role for the cytosolic ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in the process of Vpu-induced CD4 degradation. In contrast to other viral proteins (human cytomegalovirus US2 and US11), however, whose translocation of host ER molecules into the cytosol occurs in the presence of proteasome inhibitors, Vpu-targeted CD4 remains in the ER in a transport-competent form when proteasome activity is blocked.

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific accessory protein Vpu performs two distinct functions in the viral life cycle (11, 12, 29, 34, 46, 47, 50–52; reviewed in references 31 and 55): enhancement of virus particle release from the cell surface, and the selective induction of proteolysis of newly synthesized membrane proteins. Known targets for Vpu include the primary virus receptor CD4 (63, 64) and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules (28). Vpu is an oligomeric class I integral membrane phosphoprotein (35, 48, 49) with a structurally and functionally defined domain architecture: an N-terminal transmembrane anchor and C-terminal cytoplasmic tail (20, 34, 45, 47, 50, 65). Vpu-induced degradation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane proteins involves the phosphorylated cytoplasmic tail of the protein (50), whereas the virion release function is mediated by a cation-selective ion channel activity associated with the membrane anchor (19, 31, 45, 47).CD4 is a 55-kDa class I integral membrane glycoprotein that serves as the primary coreceptor for HIV entry into cells. CD4 consists of a large lumenal domain, a transmembrane peptide, and a 38-residue cytoplasmic tail. It is expressed on the surface of a subset of T lymphocytes that recognize MHC class II-associated peptides, and it plays a pivotal role in the development and maintenance of the immune system (reviewed in reference 30). Down regulation of CD4 in HIV-1-infected cells is mediated through several independent mechanisms (reviewed in references 5 and 55): intracellular complex formation of CD4 with the HIV envelope protein gp160 (8, 14), endocytosis of cell surface CD4 induced by the HIV-1 nef gene product (1, 2), and ER degradation induced by the HIV-1 vpu gene product (63, 64).Vpu-induced degradation of CD4 is an example of ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD). ERAD is a common outcome when proteins in the secretory pathway are unable to acquire their native structure (4). Although it was thought that ERAD occurs exclusively inside membrane vesicles of the ER or other related secretory compartments, this has gained little direct experimental support. Indeed, there are several recent reports that ERAD may actually represent export of the target protein to the cytosol, where it is degraded by cytosolic proteases. It was found that in yeast, a secreted protein, prepro-α-factor (pαF), is exported from microsomes and degraded in the cytosol in a proteasome-dependent manner (36). This process was dependent on the presence of calnexin, an ER-resident molecular chaperone that interacts with N-linked oligosaccharides containing terminal glucose residues (3). In mammalian cells, two human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) proteins, US2 and US11, were found to cause the retranslocation of MHC class I molecules from the ER to the cytosol, where they are destroyed by proteasomes (61, 62). In the case of US2, class I molecules were found to associate with a protein (Sec61) present in the channel normally used to translocate newly synthesized proteins into the ER (termed the translocon), leading to the suggestion that the ERAD substrates are delivered to the cytosol by retrograde transport through the Sec61-containing pore (61). Fujita et al. (24) reported that, similar to these findings, the proteasome-specific inhibitor lactacystin (LC) partially blocked CD4 degradation in transfected HeLa cells coexpressing CD4, Vpu, and HIV-1 Env glycoproteins. In the present study, we show that Vpu-induced CD4 degradation can be completely blocked by proteasome inhibitors, does not require the ER chaperone calnexin, but requires the function of the cytosolic polyubiquitination machinery which apparently targets potential ubiquitination sites within the CD4 cytoplasmic tail. Our findings point to differences between the mechanism of Vpu-mediated CD4 degradation and ERAD processes induced by the HCMV proteins US2 and US11 (61, 62).     

The Cell Tropism of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Determines the Kinetics of Plasma Viremia in SCID Mice Reconstituted with Human Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Most individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) initially harbor macrophage-tropic, non-syncytium-inducing (M-tropic, NSI) viruses that may evolve into T-cell-tropic, syncytium-inducing viruses (T-tropic, SI) after several years. The reasons for the more efficient transmission of M-tropic, NSI viruses and the slow evolution of T-tropic, SI viruses remain unclear, although they may be linked to expression of appropriate chemokine coreceptors for virus entry. We have examined plasma viral RNA levels and the extent of CD4⁺ T-cell depletion in SCID mice reconstituted with human peripheral blood leukocytes following infection with M-tropic, dual-tropic, or T-tropic HIV-1 isolates. The cell tropism was found to determine the course of viremia, with M-tropic viruses producing sustained high viral RNA levels and sparing some CD4⁺ T cells, dual-tropic viruses producing a transient and lower viral RNA spike and extremely rapid depletion of CD4⁺ T cells, and T-tropic viruses causing similarly lower viral RNA levels and rapid-intermediate rates of CD4⁺ T-cell depletion. A single amino acid change in the V3 region of gp120 was sufficient to cause one isolate to switch from M-tropic to dual-tropic and acquire the ability to rapidly deplete all CD4⁺ T cells.The envelope gene of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) determines the cell tropism of the virus (11, 32, 47, 62), the use of chemokine receptors as cofactors for viral entry (4, 17), and the ability of the virus to induce syncytia in infected cells (55, 60). Cell tropism is closely linked to but probably not exclusively determined by the ability of different HIV-1 envelopes to bind CD4 and the CC or the CXC chemokine receptors and initiate viral fusion with the target cell. Macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) viruses infect primary cultures of macrophages and CD4⁺ T cells and use CCR5 as the preferred coreceptor (2, 5, 15, 23, 26, 31). T-cell-tropic (T-tropic) viruses can infect primary cultures of CD4⁺ T cells and established T-cell lines, but not primary macrophages. T-tropic viruses use CXCR4 as a coreceptor for viral entry (27). Dual-tropic viruses have both of these properties and can use either CCR5 or CXCR4 (and infrequently other chemokine receptors [25]) for viral entry (24, 37, 57). M-tropic viruses are most frequently transmitted during primary infection of humans and persist throughout the duration of the infection (63). Many, but not all, infected individuals show an evolution of virus cell tropism from M-tropic to dual-tropic and finally to T-tropic with increasing time after infection (21, 38, 57). Increases in replicative capacity of viruses from patients with long-term infection have also been noted (22), and the switch to the syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotype in T-tropic or dual-tropic isolates is associated with more rapid disease progression (10, 20, 60). Primary infection with dual-tropic or T-tropic HIV, although infrequent, often leads to rapid disease progression (16, 51). The viral and host factors that determine the higher transmission rate of M-tropic HIV-1 and the slow evolution of dual- or T-tropic variants remain to be elucidated (4).These observations suggest that infection with T-tropic, SI virus isolates in animal model systems with SCID mice grafted with human lymphoid cells or tissue should lead to a rapid course of disease (1, 8, 44–46). While some studies in SCID mice grafted with fetal thymus and liver are in agreement with this concept (33, 34), our previous studies with the human peripheral blood leukocyte-SCID (hu-PBL-SCID) mouse model have shown that infection with M-tropic isolates (e.g., SF162) causes more rapid CD4⁺ T-cell depletion than infection with T-tropic, SI isolates (e.g., SF33), despite similar proviral copy numbers, and that this property mapped to envelope (28, 41, 43). However, the dual-tropic 89.6 isolate (19) caused extremely rapid CD4⁺ T-cell depletion in infected hu-PBL-SCID mice that was associated with an early and transient increase in HIV-1 plasma viral RNA (29). The relationship between cell tropism of the virus isolate and the pattern of disease in hu-PBL-SCID mice is thus uncertain. We have extended these studies by determining the kinetics of HIV-1 RNA levels in serial plasma samples of hu-PBL-SCID mice infected with primary patient isolates or laboratory stocks that differ in cell tropism and SI properties. The results showed significant differences in the kinetics of HIV-1 replication and CD4⁺ T-cell depletion that are determined by the cell tropism of the virus isolate.     

Inhibition and Activation by CD244 Depends on CD2 and Phospholipase C-��1

Regulation by the NK and T cell surface receptor CD244 in mice and humans depends both on engagement at the cell surface by CD48 and intracellular interactions with SAP and EAT-2. Relevance to human disease by manipulating CD244 in mouse models is complicated by rodent CD2 also binding CD48. We distinguish between contributions of mouse CD244 and CD2 on engagement of CD48 in a mouse T cell hybridoma. CD2 and CD244 both contribute positively to the immune response as mutation of proline-rich motifs or tyrosine motifs in the tails of CD2 and CD244, respectively, result in a decrease in antigen-specific interleukin-2 production. Inhibitory effects of mouse CD244 are accounted for by competition with CD2 at the cell surface for CD48. In humans CD2 and CD244 are engaged separately at the cell surface but biochemical data suggest a potential conserved intracellular link between the two receptors through FYN kinase. We identify a novel signaling mechanism for CD244 through its potential to recruit phospholipase C-γ1 via the conserved phosphorylated tyrosine motif in the tail of the adaptor protein EAT-2, which we show is important for function.The CD2 family of cell surface receptors is differentially expressed on immune cells (1, 2) and is involved in regulating both innate and adaptive immunity (3). These receptors have related extracellular immunoglobulin superfamily domains and interact either homophilically or heterophilically within the CD2 family (1, 2). The CD2 family contains a subgroup of receptors termed the SLAM family that have a conserved tyrosine signaling motif in their cytoplasmic region TXYXX(I/V) referred to as an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif (ITSM).² The SLAM family of receptors include CD244 (2B4), NTB-A (Ly-108), CD319 (CRACC, CS-1), CD150 (SLAM), CD84, and CD229 (Ly-9). Defects in signaling and aberrant expression of these receptors have been implicated in several immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders in humans and mice (4–8). Within the SLAM family, CD244 is unusual in that it shares its ligand CD48 with the receptor CD2 in rodents, whereas in humans CD2 has evolved to interact with CD58 (9). The affinity of CD244 for CD48 in rodents is 6–9-fold higher than the still functionally relevant CD2/CD48 interaction (10). CD244 and CD2 have different cytoplasmic regions comprised of tyrosine motifs or proline-rich motifs, respectively.CD244 is predominantly found on NK cells and cytotoxic T cells and primarily characterized as an activating receptor (11–15). CD2 is found on the same cells as CD244 but is also expressed on all T cells, both activated and resting, and has an activating or costimulatory function upon engagement of ligand (9). The tyrosine motifs found in the cytoplasmic tail of CD244 have been shown to bind the SH2 domains of cytoplasmic adaptor proteins SAP and EAT-2 and FYN kinase (16–18) and are important to its function (5, 19–21). In contrast to SH2 interactions of CD244, several SH3 domain-mediated interactions have been reported for the cytoplasmic region of CD2 including CD2AP/CMS, CIN85, FYN, and LCK (22–26).The activating function of CD244 was called into question when a study using cells from a CD244 knock-out mouse showed that CD244 had an inhibitory effect as loss of CD244 resulted in enhanced NK killing of target cells (27). This suggested that previous results in mice where positive effects were seen may have been due to blocking CD244 ligand engagement as opposed to cross-linking with antibodies against CD244 (27). This has led to proposals that there are differences in function between mouse and human CD244 as there is more evidence to suggest that human CD244 is a positive regulator enhancing cytotoxicity and cytokine production (13, 15, 28). However, other more recent studies have shown the mouse CD244/CD48 interaction to be important for cytokine production and effector functions such as cytotoxicity against tumor targets in CD244-deficient mice (29). Long and short forms of CD244 have been cloned from mice with the short form being described as activating and the long form inhibitory (27, 30). Only the long form of CD244 is present in humans and is regarded as activating (14).Positive signaling by CD244 has been attributed to the recruitment of SAP (18), which is a signaling adaptor molecule comprised of a single SH2 domain encoded by the SH2D1A gene and has the ability to recruit the kinase FYN by binding its SH3 domain (31, 32). Loss of the SAP/FYN interaction can lead to X-linked lymphoproliferative disease in humans (17). The molecular basis of in vitro inhibitory effects observed with CD244 in mice on ligation with mAb or ligand remains elusive (33). Protein tyrosine and inositol phosphatases have been reported to associate with CD244 (18, 19, 34) but our studies using surface plasmon resonance found them to be very weak and unlikely to bind competitively compared with the SAP family of adaptors or FYN (16). The SAP-related adaptor EAT-2 has been reported to have an active inhibitory effect that is dependent on tyrosine motifs in the tail of EAT-2 (35) but its mechanism is not understood. The only interaction reported for the tail of EAT-2 is with FYN kinase and studies overexpressing EAT-2 in a T cell hybridoma resulted in increased IL-2 production upon antigen stimulation (16).The conservation between mouse and human CD244 cytoplasmic regions and associated adaptors suggests that both function in a similar way. We have explored the main difference between mouse and human CD244, which is the extracellular interaction through CD48 ligation in the mouse. This has revealed that inhibitory effects of CD244 ligation in mice can be due to competition between CD244 and CD2 for CD48. We have also found that the adaptor protein EAT-2 binds PLCγ1 providing a molecular basis for the important role CD244 plays in regulating cellular cytotoxicity (13, 36). We demonstrate that there is a potentially shared signaling mechanism through the FYN kinase that links CD2 and CD244 intracellularly even though in humans CD2 and CD244 no longer share a cell surface ligand.     

Angioinhibitory Action of NK4 Involves Impaired Extracellular Assembly of Fibronectin Mediated by Perlecan-NK4 Association

NK4, a fragment of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), exerts bifunctional action as a competitive antagonist against HGF and its receptor c-Met and an angiogenesis inhibitor. Here we studied the anti-angiogenic mechanism of NK4. In cultured human endothelial cells, NK4 inhibited DNA synthesis induced not only by HGF but also by either basic fibroblast growth factor or vascular endothelial growth factor. Even if c-Met expression was diminished by small interference RNA, NK4 inhibited basic fibroblast growth factor-induced DNA synthesis, indicating that anti-angiogenic action of NK4 is c-Met-independent. Affinity purification with NK4-immobilized beads revealed that NK4 binds to perlecan. Consistent with this, NK4 colocalized with perlecan in endothelial cells. Perlecan is a multidomain heparan sulfate proteoglycan that interacts with basement membrane components such as fibronectin. NK4 inhibited extracellular assembly of fibronectin, by which fibronectin-dependent endothelial cell spreading was inhibited by NK4. Knockdown of perlecan expression by small interference RNA significantly abrogated the inhibitory effect of NK4 on fibronectin assembly and cell spreading. In NK4-treated endothelial cells, tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase and Rac activation were reduced, whereas overexpression of activated Rac recovered the DNA synthesis in NK4-treated endothelial cells. These results indicate that the association between NK4 and perlecan impairs fibronectin assembly, thereby inhibiting anchorage-dependent signaling. The identified mechanism for angiostatic action provides further proof of significance for NK4 in the treatment of cancer and potentially for vascular regulation as well.The manipulation of angiogenesis has potential therapeutic value for the treatment of a variety of diseases including cancer, arthritis, and cardiovascular disease (1, 2). In addition to endothelial cell migration and proliferation, angiogenesis is a process involving dynamic matrix transition (3). During angiogenesis, the vascular basement membrane undergoes proteolytic degradation and transit to the provisional matrix consisting of fibronectin, etc., followed by an intermediate and mature new vascular basement membrane. Growing evidence has shown that such an extracellular matrix (ECM)² not only provides mechanical support to the cells but also essentially regulates cell growth, migration, and survival. The fact that a number of endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis have been identified from proteolytic fragments of ECM molecules also highlights the important regulatory roles of ECM in angiogenesis (3).NK4 is a proteolytic fragment of hepatocyte growth factor, HGF (4), consisting of an N-terminal hairpin domain and four kringle domains of the α-chain of HGF (5). By competitively binding to HGF receptor c-Met, NK4 acts as an HGF antagonist (5, 6). The NK4 fragment seems to be physiologically generated by mast cells and neutrophils peptidases during inflammation (7). Because HGF regulates malignant behavior in a variety of tumors by inducing invasive, angiogenic, and metastatic responses (8, 9), the blockade of HGF-c-Met signaling by NK4 is a strategy to inhibit tumor invasion and metastasis (6, 9–11). During investigation of a therapeutic approach with NK4 in experimental cancer models, we unexpectedly found that NK4 functions as an angiogenesis inhibitor (12). Based on the bifunctional characteristic as HGF antagonist and angiogenesis inhibitor, NK4 suppressed malignant behavior of cancers, including invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis-dependent tumor growth (9–12).The angiostatic activity of NK4 is probably independent of its original activity as an HGF antagonist because an anti-HGF antibody capable of preventing HGF-c-Met association did not inhibit human endothelial cell growth stimulated by either bFGF or VEGF (12). However, the mechanism by which NK4 inhibits angiogenic responses in endothelial cells remains to be addressed. In the present study we newly identified perlecan to be an NK4 binding molecule and found that in vascular endothelial cells the association of NK4 with perlecan inhibited extracellular fibronectin assembly, fibronectin-dependent cell spreading, and the subsequent anchorage-dependent signals. Together with our finding that c-Met/HGF receptor is not required for the inhibition of DNA synthesis by NK4, we propose that the association of NK4 with perlecan plays a key role in angiogenesis inhibition by NK4.     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

PTIP Regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA Damage Sites

Although PTIP is implicated in the DNA damage response, through interactions with 53BP1, the function of PTIP in the DNA damage response remain elusive. Here, we show that RNF8 controls DNA damage-induced nuclear foci formation of PTIP, which in turn regulates 53BP1 localization to the DNA damage sites. In addition, SMC1, a substrate of ATM, could not be phosphorylated at the DNA damage sites in the absence of PTIP. The PTIP-dependent pathway is important for DNA double strand breaks repair and DNA damage-induced intra-S phase checkpoint activation. Taken together, these results suggest that the role of PTIP in the DNA damage response is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1. Thus, PTIP regulates 53BP1-dependent signaling pathway following DNA damage.The DNA damage response pathways are signal transduction pathways with DNA damage sensors, mediators, and effectors, which are essential for maintaining genomic stability (1–3). Following DNA double strand breaks, histone H2AX at the DNA damage sites is rapidly phosphorylated by ATM/ATR/DNAPK (4–10), a family homologous to phosphoinositide 3-kinases (11, 12). Subsequently, phospho-H2AX (γH2AX) provides the platform for accumulation of a larger group of DNA damage response factors, such as MDC1, BRCA1, 53BP1, and the MRE11·RAD50·NBS1 complex (13, 14), at the DNA damage sites. Translocalization of these proteins to the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)³ facilitates DNA damage checkpoint activation and enhances the efficiency of DNA damage repair (14, 15).Recently, PTIP (Pax2 transactivation domain-interacting protein, or Paxip) has been identified as a DNA damage response protein and is required for cell survival when exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) (1, 16–18). PTIP is a 1069-amino acid nuclear protein and has been originally identified in a yeast two-hybrid screening as a partner of Pax2 (19). Genetic deletion of the PTIP gene in mice leads to early embryonic lethality at embryonic day 8.5, suggesting that PTIP is essential for early embryonic development (20). Structurally, PTIP contains six tandem BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) domains (16–18, 21). The BRCT domain is a phospho-group binding domain that mediates protein-protein interactions (17, 22, 23). Interestingly, the BRCT domain has been found in a large number of proteins involved in the cellular response to DNA damages, such as BRCA1, MDC1, and 53BP1 (7, 24–29). Like other BRCT domain-containing proteins, upon exposure to IR, PTIP forms nuclear foci at the DSBs, which is dependent on its BRCT domains (16–18). By protein affinity purification, PTIP has been found in two large complexes. One includes the histone H3K4 methyltransferase ALR and its associated cofactors, the other contains DNA damage response proteins, including 53BP1 and SMC1 (30, 31). Further experiments have revealed that DNA damage enhances the interaction between PTIP and 53BP1 (18, 31).To elucidate the DNA damage response pathways, we have examined the upstream and downstream partners of PTIP. Here, we report that PTIP is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1 in response to DNA damage. Moreover, PTIP and 53BP1 are required for the phospho-ATM association with the chromatin, which phosphorylates SMC1 at the DSBs. This PTIP-dependent pathway is involved in DSBs repair.     

Neutralization Sensitivity of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Primary Isolates to Antibodies and CD4-Based Reagents Is Independent of Coreceptor Usage

We have investigated whether the identity of the coreceptor (CCR5, CXCR4, or both) used by primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates to enter CD4⁺ cells influences the sensitivity of these isolates to neutralization by monoclonal antibodies and CD4-based agents. Coreceptor usage was not an important determinant of neutralization titer for primary isolates in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We also studied whether dualtropic primary isolates (able to use both CCR5 and CXCR4) were differentially sensitive to neutralization by the same antibodies when entering U87MG-CD4 cells stably expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4. Again, we found that the coreceptor used by a virus did not greatly affect its neutralization sensitivity. Similar results were obtained for CCR5- or CXCR4-expressing HOS cell lines engineered to express green fluorescent protein as a reporter of HIV-1 entry. Neutralizing antibodies are therefore unlikely to be the major selection pressure which drives the phenotypic evolution (change in coreceptor usage) of HIV-1 that can occur in vivo. In addition, the increase in neutralization sensitivity found when primary isolates adapt to growth in transformed cell lines in vitro has little to do with alterations in coreceptor usage.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) enters CD4⁺ T cells via an interaction with CD4 and coreceptor molecules, the most important of which yet identified are the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR5 (4, 12, 23, 26, 28, 32). CXCR4 is used by T-cell line-tropic (T-tropic) primary isolates or T-cell line-adapted (TCLA) lab strains, whereas CCR5 is used by primary isolates of the macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) phenotype (4, 12, 23, 26, 28, 32). Most T-tropic isolates and some TCLA strains are actually dualtropic in that they can use both CXCR4 and CCR5 (and often other coreceptors such as CCR3, Bonzo/STRL33, and BOB/gpr15), at least in coreceptor-transfected cells (18, 24, 30, 54, 89). The M-tropic and T-tropic/dualtropic nomenclature has often been used interchangeably with the terms “non-syncytium-inducing” (NSI) and “syncytium-inducing” (SI), although it is semantically imprecise to do so.M-tropic viruses are those most commonly transmitted sexually (3, 33, 87, 106) and from mother to infant (2, 72, 81). If T-tropic strains are transmitted, or when they emerge, this is associated with a more rapid course of disease in both adults (17, 37, 46, 51, 52, 76, 78, 82, 92, 101) and children (6, 45, 84, 90). However, T-tropic viruses emerge in only about 40% of infected people, usually only several years after infection (76, 78). A well-documented, albeit anecdotal, study found that when a T-tropic strain was transmitted by direct transfer of blood, its replication was rapidly suppressed: the T-tropic virus was eliminated from the body, and M-tropic strains predominated (20). These results suggest that there is a counterselection pressure against the emergence of T-tropic strains during the early stages of HIV-1 infection in most people. But what is this pressure?Since the M-tropic and T-tropic phenotypes are properties mediated by the envelope glycoproteins whose function is to associate with CD4 and the coreceptors, a selection pressure differentially exerted on M- and T-tropic viruses could, in principle, act at the level of virus entry. In other words, neutralizing antibodies to the envelope glycoproteins, or the chemokine ligands of the coreceptors, could theoretically interfere more potently with the interactions of T-tropic strains with CXCR4 than with M-tropic viruses and CCR5. A differential effect of this nature could suppress the emergence of T-tropic viruses. Consistent with this possibility, neutralizing antibodies are capable of preventing the CD4-dependent association of gp120 with CCR5 (42, 94, 103), and chemokines can also prevent the coreceptor interactions of HIV-1 (8, 13, 23, 28, 70).Here, we explore whether the efficiency of HIV-1 neutralization is affected by coreceptor usage. Although earlier studies have not found T-tropic strains to be inherently more neutralization sensitive than M-tropic ones (20, 40, 44), previously available reagents and techniques may not have been adequate to fully address this question. One major problem is that even single residue changes can drastically affect both antibody binding to neutralization epitopes and the HIV-1 phenotype (25, 55, 62, 67, 83, 91), and so studies using relatively unrelated viruses and a fixed antibody (polyclonal or monoclonal) preparation have two variables to contend with: the viral phenotype (coreceptor use) and the antigenic structure of the virus and hence the efficiency of the antibody-virion interaction.We have used a new experimental strategy to explore whether coreceptor usage affects neutralization sensitivity in the absence of other confounding variables: the use of dualtropic viruses able to enter CD4⁺ cells via either CCR5 or CXCR4. By using a constant HIV-1 isolate or clone and the same monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) or CD4-based reagents as neutralizing agents, we can ensure that the only variable under study in the neutralization reaction is the nature of the coreceptor used for entry. Our major conclusion is that there is no strong association between coreceptor usage and neutralization sensitivity for primary HIV-1 isolates. Independent studies have reached the same conclusion (53a, 59). The emergence of T-tropic (SI) viruses in vivo may be unlikely to be due to escape from antibody-mediated selection pressure.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]