High-definition De Novo Sequencing of Crustacean Hyperglycemic Hormone (CHH)-family Neuropeptides

A complete understanding of the biological functions of large signaling peptides (>4 kDa) requires comprehensive characterization of their amino acid sequences and post-translational modifications, which presents significant analytical challenges. In the past decade, there has been great success with mass spectrometry-based de novo sequencing of small neuropeptides. However, these approaches are less applicable to larger neuropeptides because of the inefficient fragmentation of peptides larger than 4 kDa and their lower endogenous abundance. The conventional proteomics approach focuses on large-scale determination of protein identities via database searching, lacking the ability for in-depth elucidation of individual amino acid residues. Here, we present a multifaceted MS approach for identification and characterization of large crustacean hyperglycemic hormone (CHH)-family neuropeptides, a class of peptide hormones that play central roles in the regulation of many important physiological processes of crustaceans. Six crustacean CHH-family neuropeptides (8–9.5 kDa), including two novel peptides with extensive disulfide linkages and PTMs, were fully sequenced without reference to genomic databases. High-definition de novo sequencing was achieved by a combination of bottom-up, off-line top-down, and on-line top-down tandem MS methods. Statistical evaluation indicated that these methods provided complementary information for sequence interpretation and increased the local identification confidence of each amino acid. Further investigations by MALDI imaging MS mapped the spatial distribution and colocalization patterns of various CHH-family neuropeptides in the neuroendocrine organs, revealing that two CHH-subfamilies are involved in distinct signaling pathways.Neuropeptides and hormones comprise a diverse class of signaling molecules involved in numerous essential physiological processes, including analgesia, reward, food intake, learning and memory (1). Disorders of the neurosecretory and neuroendocrine systems influence many pathological processes. For example, obesity results from failure of energy homeostasis in association with endocrine alterations (2, 3). Previous work from our lab used crustaceans as model organisms found that multiple neuropeptides were implicated in control of food intake, including RFamides, tachykinin related peptides, RYamides, and pyrokinins (4–6).Crustacean hyperglycemic hormone (CHH)¹ family neuropeptides play a central role in energy homeostasis of crustaceans (7–17). Hyperglycemic response of the CHHs was first reported after injection of crude eyestalk extract in crustaceans. Based on their preprohormone organization, the CHH family can be grouped into two sub-families: subfamily-I containing CHH, and subfamily-II containing molt-inhibiting hormone (MIH) and mandibular organ-inhibiting hormone (MOIH). The preprohormones of the subfamily-I have a CHH precursor related peptide (CPRP) that is cleaved off during processing; and preprohormones of the subfamily-II lack the CPRP (9). Uncovering their physiological functions will provide new insights into neuroendocrine regulation of energy homeostasis.Characterization of CHH-family neuropeptides is challenging. They are comprised of more than 70 amino acids and often contain multiple post-translational modifications (PTMs) and complex disulfide bridge connections (7). In addition, physiological concentrations of these peptide hormones are typically below picomolar level, and most crustacean species do not have available genome and proteome databases to assist MS-based sequencing.MS-based neuropeptidomics provides a powerful tool for rapid discovery and analysis of a large number of endogenous peptides from the brain and the central nervous system. Our group and others have greatly expanded the peptidomes of many model organisms (3, 18–33). For example, we have discovered more than 200 neuropeptides with several neuropeptide families consisting of as many as 20–40 members in a simple crustacean model system (5, 6, 25–31, 34). However, a majority of these neuropeptides are small peptides with 5–15 amino acid residues long, leaving a gap of identifying larger signaling peptides from organisms without sequenced genome. The observed lack of larger size peptide hormones can be attributed to the lack of effective de novo sequencing strategies for neuropeptides larger than 4 kDa, which are inherently more difficult to fragment using conventional techniques (34–37). Although classical proteomics studies examine larger proteins, these tools are limited to identification based on database searching with one or more peptides matching without complete amino acid sequence coverage (36, 38).Large populations of neuropeptides from 4–10 kDa exist in the nervous systems of both vertebrates and invertebrates (9, 39, 40). Understanding their functional roles requires sufficient molecular knowledge and a unique analytical approach. Therefore, developing effective and reliable methods for de novo sequencing of large neuropeptides at the individual amino acid residue level is an urgent gap to fill in neurobiology. In this study, we present a multifaceted MS strategy aimed at high-definition de novo sequencing and comprehensive characterization of the CHH-family neuropeptides in crustacean central nervous system. The high-definition de novo sequencing was achieved by a combination of three methods: (1) enzymatic digestion and LC-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) bottom-up analysis to generate detailed sequences of proteolytic peptides; (2) off-line LC fractionation and subsequent top-down MS/MS to obtain high-quality fragmentation maps of intact peptides; and (3) on-line LC coupled to top-down MS/MS to allow rapid sequence analysis of low abundance peptides. Combining the three methods overcomes the limitations of each, and thus offers complementary and high-confidence determination of amino acid residues. We report the complete sequence analysis of six CHH-family neuropeptides including the discovery of two novel peptides. With the accurate molecular information, MALDI imaging and ion mobility MS were conducted for the first time to explore their anatomical distribution and biochemical properties.     

Enhanced Sensitivity for Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry-based Targeted Proteomics Using a Dual Stage Electrodynamic Ion Funnel Interface

Selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (SRM-MS) is playing an increasing role in quantitative proteomics and biomarker discovery studies as a method for high throughput candidate quantification and verification. Although SRM-MS offers advantages in sensitivity and quantification compared with other MS-based techniques, current SRM technologies are still challenged by detection and quantification of low abundance proteins (e.g. present at ∼10 ng/ml or lower levels in blood plasma). Here we report enhanced detection sensitivity and reproducibility for SRM-based targeted proteomics by coupling a nanospray ionization multicapillary inlet/dual electrodynamic ion funnel interface to a commercial triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Because of the increased efficiency in ion transmission, significant enhancements in overall signal intensities and improved limits of detection were observed with the new interface compared with the original interface for SRM measurements of tryptic peptides from proteins spiked into non-depleted mouse plasma over a range of concentrations. Overall, average SRM peak intensities were increased by ∼70-fold. The average level of detection for peptides also improved by ∼10-fold with notably improved reproducibility of peptide measurements as indicated by the reduced coefficients of variance. The ability to detect proteins ranging from 40 to 80 ng/ml within mouse plasma was demonstrated for all spiked proteins without the application of front-end immunoaffinity depletion and fractionation. This significant improvement in detection sensitivity for low abundance proteins in complex matrices is expected to enhance a broad range of SRM-MS applications including targeted protein and metabolite validation.Although mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is a promising high throughput technology for biomarker discovery and validation (1–5), only a handful of cancer biomarkers have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for clinical use in the last decade (6, 7). Assuming that low abundance biomarkers do exist in the biofluids to be studied, the success of biomarker discovery efforts primarily depends on the sensitivity, accuracy, and robustness of the measurement technologies; the quality and size of patient cohorts and clinical samples and execution within the context of an overall difficult and expensive path to clinical application that encompasses discovery, verification, and validation stages (1, 5, 8–10). A multiplexed assay platform increasingly considered for biomarker verification is selected reaction monitoring (SRM)¹ by tandem mass spectrometry using e.g. a triple quadrupole (QqQ) mass spectrometer to attain high throughput quantitative measurements of targeted proteins in complex matrices (1, 11, 12).SRM utilizes two stages of mass filtering by selecting a specific analyte ion of interest (precursor ion) in the first stage followed by a specific fragment ion derived from the precursor (fragment ion) filter in the second stage after collision-activated dissociation. Typically, several transitions (precursor/fragment ion pairs) are monitored for greater selectivity and confidence in a targeted peptide assay, and large numbers of peptides can be monitored during a single LC-MS/MS analysis. The two-stage mass selection by individual quadrupoles enables more rapid and continuous monitoring of specific ions derived from analytes of interest such as peptides and leads to significantly enhanced detection sensitivity and quantitative accuracy compared with broad (i.e. non-targeted) LC-MS or LC-MS/MS measurements (11, 12). Both the sensitivity and selectivity of SRM-MS make this technique well suited for the targeted detection and quantification of low abundance proteins in highly complex biofluids (13–16). The precision and reproducibility of SRM-based measurements of proteins in plasma across different laboratories have recently been assessed (17).Despite its promise, present SRM measurements still do not provide sufficient sensitivity for reliable detection and quantification of low abundance proteins in biofluids (e.g. present in plasma at ∼10 ng/ml or lower levels) primarily because of factors related to high sample complexity and the large dynamic range of relative protein abundances (7, 18, 19). Given sufficient selectivity, the sensitivity achievable is generally related to the peptide MS and MS/MS signal intensities obtained. One of the key factors limiting peptide MS intensities is the significant ion losses encountered between the electrospray ionization (ESI) source and the interface to the mass spectrometer. In typical LC-ESI-MS interfaces, the mass spectrometer inlet (e.g. heated capillary followed by a skimmer) presently provides total ion utilization and ion transmission efficiencies on the order of ∼1% (20) due to a combination of limited ion sampling from the atmospheric pressure ion source into the inlet and inefficient transmission of ions entering the first reduced pressure stage of the mass spectrometer.The electrodynamic ion funnel (21), which has been developed to efficiently capture, focus, and transmit ions to the high vacuum region of the mass spectrometer, is expected to provide a large benefit to SRM analyses. The original ion funnel interfaces, which operated at a maximum of ∼5 torr, were able to enhance signal intensities for a variety of MS analyzers (22–24) by replacing the inefficient skimmer interface. Although achieving near lossless ion transmission to high vacuum, losses at the atmospheric pressure interface went unmitigated. More recently, a high pressure ion funnel interface capable of operating at a pressure of ∼30 torr was introduced (25). The higher operating pressures accommodated greater gas loads and enabled more efficient ion sampling from atmospheric pressure through a multicapillary inlet. With a dual ion funnel interface comprising a high pressure ion funnel with a heated multicapillary inlet followed by a standard ion funnel operated at 1–2 torrs, highly efficient ion sampling from atmospheric pressure to high vacuum is readily achieved.In this study, we report the enhanced sensitivity and reproducibility of SRM-based targeted proteomics measurements achieved by implementing a dual stage electrodynamic ion funnel interface that incorporates a multicapillary inlet with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. A series of LC-SRM-MS measurements were made using mouse plasma samples spiked with various concentrations of tryptic peptides from five standard proteins to evaluate the improvements in detection sensitivity and reproducibility attained by this modified interface relative to a standard Thermo (single capillary inlet/skimmer) interface. A ∼10-fold improvement in the limit of detection (LOD) as well as improved measurement reproducibility was achieved.     

Targeted Proteomic Quantification on Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer

There is an immediate need for improved methods to systematically and precisely quantify large sets of peptides in complex biological samples. To date protein quantification in biological samples has been routinely performed on triple quadrupole instruments operated in selected reaction monitoring mode (SRM), and two major challenges remain. Firstly, the number of peptides to be included in one survey experiment needs to be increased to routinely reach several hundreds, and secondly, the degree of selectivity should be improved so as to reliably discriminate the targeted analytes from background interferences. High resolution and accurate mass (HR/AM) analysis on the recently developed Q-Exactive mass spectrometer can potentially address these issues. This instrument presents a unique configuration: it is constituted of an orbitrap mass analyzer equipped with a quadrupole mass filter as the front-end for precursor ion mass selection. This configuration enables new quantitative methods based on HR/AM measurements, including targeted analysis in MS mode (single ion monitoring) and in MS/MS mode (parallel reaction monitoring). The ability of the quadrupole to select a restricted m/z range allows one to overcome the dynamic range limitations associated with trapping devices, and the MS/MS mode provides an additional stage of selectivity. When applied to targeted protein quantification in urine samples and benchmarked with the reference SRM technique, the quadrupole-orbitrap instrument exhibits similar or better performance in terms of selectivity, dynamic range, and sensitivity. This high performance is further enhanced by leveraging the multiplexing capability of the instrument to design novel acquisition methods and apply them to large targeted proteomic studies for the first time, as demonstrated on 770 tryptic yeast peptides analyzed in one 60-min experiment. The increased quality of quadrupole-orbitrap data has the potential to improve existing protein quantification methods in complex samples and address the pressing demand of systems biology or biomarker evaluation studies.Shotgun proteomics has emerged over the past decade as the most effective method for the qualitative study of complex proteomes (i.e., the identification of the protein content), as illustrated by a wealth of publications (1, 2). In this approach, after enzymatic digestion of the proteins, the generated peptides are analyzed by means of liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)¹ in a data dependent mode. However, the complexity of the digested proteomes under investigation and the wide range of protein abundances limit the reproducibility and the sensitivity of this stochastic approach (3), which is critical if one aims at the systematic quantification of the proteins. Thus, alternative MS approaches have emerged for the systematic quantitative study of complex proteomes, the MS-based targeted proteomics (4). In this hypothesis-driven approach, only specific subsets of analytes (a few targeted peptides used as surrogates for the proteins of interest) are selectively measured in predefined m/z ranges and retention time windows, which overcomes the bias toward most abundant compounds commonly observed with shotgun proteomics. When applied to complex biological samples—for example, bodily fluids such as urine or plasma—targeted proteomics requires high performance instruments allowing measurements of a wide dynamic range (many orders of magnitude), with high sensitivity in order to detect peptides in the low amol range and sufficient selectivity to cope with massive biochemical background (5). Selected reaction monitoring (SRM) on triple quadrupole (6) or triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometers (7) has emerged as a means to conduct such analyses (8). Initially applied in the MS analysis of small molecules (9, 10), SRM has gradually emerged as the reference quantitative technique for analyzing proteins (or peptides) in biological samples. When coupled with the isotope dilution strategy (11, 12), this very effective technique allows the precise quantification of proteins (13–18). However, despite the increased selectivity provided by the two-stage mass filtering of SRM (at the precursor and fragment ion levels), the low resolution of mass selection does not allow the systematic removal of interferences (19, 20). Moreover, in proteomics, the biochemical background has a composition similar to that of the analytes of interest, which remains a major hurdle limiting the sensitivity of assays, especially in a bodily fluid matrix. High resolution/accurate mass (HR/AM) analysis represents a promising alternative approach that might more efficiently distinguish the compounds of interest from interferences in targeted proteomics. Such analyses can be conducted on orbitrap-based mass spectrometers because of their high sensitivity and high mass accuracy capabilities (21). The introduction of the benchtop standalone orbitrap mass spectrometer (Exactive) (22) further strengthened the attractiveness of the approach, especially in the field of small molecule analysis (23, 24). However, as quantification using trapping devices intrinsically suffers from a limited dynamic range because of the overall ion capacity, the complexity of biological samples remains very challenging even with the HR/AM approach (25). Targeted protein analysis with triple quadrupole mass spectrometers keeps on showing significant superiority for such samples.² The recently developed quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer (Q-Exactive) can potentially address this issue.³ It is constituted of an orbitrap mass analyzer equipped with a quadrupole mass filter as the front-end for precursor ion mass selection (26, 27). This configuration combines advantages of triple quadrupole instruments for mass filtering and orbitrap-based mass spectrometers for HR/AM measurement. The ability of the instrument to select a restricted m/z range or (sequentially) a small number of precursor ions offers new opportunities for quantification in complex samples by selectively enriching low abundant components. The resulting data, acquired in the so-called single ion monitoring (SIM) mode, fully benefit from the trapping capability while keeping a high acquisition rate as a result of the fast switching time between targeted precursor ions of the quadrupole. Although this mode of data acquisition is possible with a configuration combining a linear ion trap with the orbitrap (as in the LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer), its effectiveness is far more limited in this case. The quadrupole-orbitrap configuration presents significant benefits by selectively isolating a narrow population of precursor ions. Other features of the instrument include its multiplexed trapping capability (26) using either the C-trap or the higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) cell (28, 29), which opens new avenues in the design of innovative acquisition methods for quantification studies. For the first time, a panel of acquisition methods is designed and applied to targeted quantification at the MS and MS/MS levels. In the latter case, the simultaneous monitoring of multiple MS/MS fragmentation channels, also called parallel reaction monitoring⁴ (PRM), is particularly promising for quantifying large sets of peptides with increased selectivity.     

JUMP: A Tag-based Database Search Tool for Peptide Identification with High Sensitivity and Accuracy

Database search programs are essential tools for identifying peptides via mass spectrometry (MS) in shotgun proteomics. Simultaneously achieving high sensitivity and high specificity during a database search is crucial for improving proteome coverage. Here we present JUMP, a new hybrid database search program that generates amino acid tags and ranks peptide spectrum matches (PSMs) by an integrated score from the tags and pattern matching. In a typical run of liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution tandem MS, more than 95% of MS/MS spectra can generate at least one tag, whereas the remaining spectra are usually too poor to derive genuine PSMs. To enhance search sensitivity, the JUMP program enables the use of tags as short as one amino acid. Using a target-decoy strategy, we compared JUMP with other programs (e.g. SEQUEST, Mascot, PEAKS DB, and InsPecT) in the analysis of multiple datasets and found that JUMP outperformed these preexisting programs. JUMP also permitted the analysis of multiple co-fragmented peptides from “mixture spectra” to further increase PSMs. In addition, JUMP-derived tags allowed partial de novo sequencing and facilitated the unambiguous assignment of modified residues. In summary, JUMP is an effective database search algorithm complementary to current search programs.Peptide identification by tandem mass spectra is a critical step in mass spectrometry (MS)-based¹ proteomics (1). Numerous computational algorithms and software tools have been developed for this purpose (2–6). These algorithms can be classified into three categories: (i) pattern-based database search, (ii) de novo sequencing, and (iii) hybrid search that combines database search and de novo sequencing. With the continuous development of high-performance liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometers, it is now possible to analyze almost all protein components in mammalian cells (7). In contrast to rapid data collection, it remains a challenge to extract accurate information from the raw data to identify peptides with low false positive rates (specificity) and minimal false negatives (sensitivity) (8).Database search methods usually assign peptide sequences by comparing MS/MS spectra to theoretical peptide spectra predicted from a protein database, as exemplified in SEQUEST (9), Mascot (10), OMSSA (11), X!Tandem (12), Spectrum Mill (13), ProteinProspector (14), MyriMatch (15), Crux (16), MS-GFDB (17), Andromeda (18), BaMS² (19), and Morpheus (20). Some other programs, such as SpectraST (21) and Pepitome (22), utilize a spectral library composed of experimentally identified and validated MS/MS spectra. These methods use a variety of scoring algorithms to rank potential peptide spectrum matches (PSMs) and select the top hit as a putative PSM. However, not all PSMs are correctly assigned. For example, false peptides may be assigned to MS/MS spectra with numerous noisy peaks and poor fragmentation patterns. If the samples contain unknown protein modifications, mutations, and contaminants, the related MS/MS spectra also result in false positives, as their corresponding peptides are not in the database. Other false positives may be generated simply by random matches. Therefore, it is of importance to remove these false PSMs to improve dataset quality. One common approach is to filter putative PSMs to achieve a final list with a predefined false discovery rate (FDR) via a target-decoy strategy, in which decoy proteins are merged with target proteins in the same database for estimating false PSMs (23–26). However, the true and false PSMs are not always distinguishable based on matching scores. It is a problem to set up an appropriate score threshold to achieve maximal sensitivity and high specificity (13, 27, 28).De novo methods, including Lutefisk (29), PEAKS (30), NovoHMM (31), PepNovo (32), pNovo (33), Vonovo (34), and UniNovo (35), identify peptide sequences directly from MS/MS spectra. These methods can be used to derive novel peptides and post-translational modifications without a database, which is useful, especially when the related genome is not sequenced. High-resolution MS/MS spectra greatly facilitate the generation of peptide sequences in these de novo methods. However, because MS/MS fragmentation cannot always produce all predicted product ions, only a portion of collected MS/MS spectra have sufficient quality to extract partial or full peptide sequences, leading to lower sensitivity than achieved with the database search methods.To improve the sensitivity of the de novo methods, a hybrid approach has been proposed to integrate peptide sequence tags into PSM scoring during database searches (36). Numerous software packages have been developed, such as GutenTag (37), InsPecT (38), Byonic (39), DirecTag (40), and PEAKS DB (41). These methods use peptide tag sequences to filter a protein database, followed by error-tolerant database searching. One restriction in most of these algorithms is the requirement of a minimum tag length of three amino acids for matching protein sequences in the database. This restriction reduces the sensitivity of the database search, because it filters out some high-quality spectra in which consecutive tags cannot be generated.In this paper, we describe JUMP, a novel tag-based hybrid algorithm for peptide identification. The program is optimized to balance sensitivity and specificity during tag derivation and MS/MS pattern matching. JUMP can use all potential sequence tags, including tags consisting of only one amino acid. When we compared its performance to that of two widely used search algorithms, SEQUEST and Mascot, JUMP identified ∼30% more PSMs at the same FDR threshold. In addition, the program provides two additional features: (i) using tag sequences to improve modification site assignment, and (ii) analyzing co-fragmented peptides from mixture MS/MS spectra.     

A New in Vivo Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry Platform to Define Protein–Protein Interactions in Living Cells

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are fundamental to the structure and function of protein complexes. Resolving the physical contacts between proteins as they occur in cells is critical to uncovering the molecular details underlying various cellular activities. To advance the study of PPIs in living cells, we have developed a new in vivo cross-linking mass spectrometry platform that couples a novel membrane-permeable, enrichable, and MS-cleavable cross-linker with multistage tandem mass spectrometry. This strategy permits the effective capture, enrichment, and identification of in vivo cross-linked products from mammalian cells and thus enables the determination of protein interaction interfaces. The utility of the developed method has been demonstrated by profiling PPIs in mammalian cells at the proteome scale and the targeted protein complex level. Our work represents a general approach for studying in vivo PPIs and provides a solid foundation for future studies toward the complete mapping of PPI networks in living systems.Protein–protein interactions (PPIs)¹ play a key role in defining protein functions in biological systems. Aberrant PPIs can have drastic effects on biochemical activities essential to cell homeostasis, growth, and proliferation, and thereby lead to various human diseases (1). Consequently, PPI interfaces have been recognized as a new paradigm for drug development. Therefore, mapping PPIs and their interaction interfaces in living cells is critical not only for a comprehensive understanding of protein function and regulation, but also for describing the molecular mechanisms underlying human pathologies and identifying potential targets for better therapeutics.Several strategies exist for identifying and mapping PPIs, including yeast two-hybrid, protein microarray, and affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) (2–5). Thanks to new developments in sample preparation strategies, mass spectrometry technologies, and bioinformatics tools, AP-MS has become a powerful and preferred method for studying PPIs at the systems level (6–9). Unlike other approaches, AP-MS experiments allow the capture of protein interactions directly from their natural cellular environment, thus better retaining native protein structures and biologically relevant interactions. In addition, a broader scope of PPI networks can be obtained with greater sensitivity, accuracy, versatility, and speed. Despite the success of this very promising technique, AP-MS experiments can lead to the loss of weak/transient interactions and/or the reorganization of protein interactions during biochemical manipulation under native purification conditions. To circumvent these problems, in vivo chemical cross-linking has been successfully employed to stabilize protein interactions in native cells or tissues prior to cell lysis (10–16). The resulting covalent bonds formed between interacting partners allow affinity purification under stringent and fully denaturing conditions, consequently reducing nonspecific background while preserving stable and weak/transient interactions (12–16). Subsequent mass spectrometric analysis can reveal not only the identities of interacting proteins, but also cross-linked amino acid residues. The latter provides direct molecular evidence describing the physical contacts between and within proteins (17). This information can be used for computational modeling to establish structural topologies of proteins and protein complexes (17–22), as well as for generating experimentally derived protein interaction network topology maps (23, 24). Thus, cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) strategies represent a powerful and emergent technology that possesses unparalleled capabilities for studying PPIs.Despite their great potential, current XL-MS studies that have aimed to identify cross-linked peptides have been mostly limited to in vitro cross-linking experiments, with few successfully identifying protein interaction interfaces in living cells (24, 25). This is largely because XL-MS studies remain challenging due to the inherent difficulty in the effective MS detection and accurate identification of cross-linked peptides, as well as in unambiguous assignment of cross-linked residues. In general, cross-linked products are heterogeneous and low in abundance relative to non-cross-linked products. In addition, their MS fragmentation is too complex to be interpreted using conventional database searching tools (17, 26). It is noted that almost all of the current in vivo PPI studies utilize formaldehyde cross-linking because of its membrane permeability and fast kinetics (10–16). However, in comparison to the most commonly used amine reactive NHS ester cross-linkers, identification of formaldehyde cross-linked peptides is even more challenging because of its promiscuous nonspecific reactivity and extremely short spacer length (27). Therefore, further developments in reagents and methods are urgently needed to enable simple MS detection and effective identification of in vivo cross-linked products, and thus allow the mapping of authentic protein contact sites as established in cells, especially for protein complexes.Various efforts have been made to address the limitations of XL-MS studies, resulting in new developments in bioinformatics tools for improved data interpretation (28–32) and new designs of cross-linking reagents for enhanced MS analysis of cross-linked peptides (24, 33–39). Among these approaches, the development of new cross-linking reagents holds great promise for mapping PPIs on the systems level. One class of cross-linking reagents containing an enrichment handle have been shown to allow selective isolation of cross-linked products from complex mixtures, boosting their detectability by MS (33–35, 40–42). A second class of cross-linkers containing MS-cleavable bonds have proven to be effective in facilitating the unambiguous identification of cross-linked peptides (36–39, 43, 44), as the resulting cross-linked products can be identified based on their characteristic and simplified fragmentation behavior during MS analysis. Therefore, an ideal cross-linking reagent would possess the combined features of both classes of cross-linkers. To advance the study of in vivo PPIs, we have developed a new XL-MS platform based on a novel membrane-permeable, enrichable, and MS-cleavable cross-linker, Azide-A-DSBSO (azide-tagged, acid-cleavable disuccinimidyl bis-sulfoxide), and multistage tandem mass spectrometry (MSⁿ). This new XL-MS strategy has been successfully employed to map in vivo PPIs from mammalian cells at both the proteome scale and the targeted protein complex level.     

Conserved Peptide Fragmentation as a Benchmarking Tool for Mass Spectrometers and a Discriminating Feature for Targeted Proteomics

Quantifying the similarity of spectra is an important task in various areas of spectroscopy, for example, to identify a compound by comparing sample spectra to those of reference standards. In mass spectrometry based discovery proteomics, spectral comparisons are used to infer the amino acid sequence of peptides. In targeted proteomics by selected reaction monitoring (SRM) or SWATH MS, predetermined sets of fragment ion signals integrated over chromatographic time are used to identify target peptides in complex samples. In both cases, confidence in peptide identification is directly related to the quality of spectral matches. In this study, we used sets of simulated spectra of well-controlled dissimilarity to benchmark different spectral comparison measures and to develop a robust scoring scheme that quantifies the similarity of fragment ion spectra. We applied the normalized spectral contrast angle score to quantify the similarity of spectra to objectively assess fragment ion variability of tandem mass spectrometric datasets, to evaluate portability of peptide fragment ion spectra for targeted mass spectrometry across different types of mass spectrometers and to discriminate target assays from decoys in targeted proteomics. Altogether, this study validates the use of the normalized spectral contrast angle as a sensitive spectral similarity measure for targeted proteomics, and more generally provides a methodology to assess the performance of spectral comparisons and to support the rational selection of the most appropriate similarity measure. The algorithms used in this study are made publicly available as an open source toolset with a graphical user interface.In “bottom-up” proteomics, peptide sequences are identified by the information contained in their fragment ion spectra (1). Various methods have been developed to generate peptide fragment ion spectra and to match them to their corresponding peptide sequences. They can be broadly grouped into discovery and targeted methods. In the widely used discovery (also referred to as shotgun) proteomic approach, peptides are identified by establishing peptide to spectrum matches via a method referred to as database searching. Each acquired fragment ion spectrum is searched against theoretical peptide fragment ion spectra computed from the entries of a specified sequence database, whereby the database search space is constrained to a user defined precursor mass tolerance (2, 3). The quality of the match between experimental and theoretical spectra is typically expressed with multiple scores. These include the number of matching or nonmatching fragments, the number of consecutive fragment ion matches among others. With few exceptions (4–7) commonly used search engines do not use the relative intensities of the acquired fragment ion signals even though this information could be expected to strengthen the confidence of peptide identification because the relative fragment ion intensity pattern acquired under controlled fragmentation conditions can be considered as a unique “fingerprint” for a given precursor. Thanks to community efforts in acquiring and sharing large number of datasets, the proteomes of some species are now essentially mapped out and experimental fragment ion spectra covering entire proteomes are increasingly becoming accessible through spectral databases (8–16). This has catalyzed the emergence of new proteomics strategies that differ from classical database searching in that they use prior spectral information to identify peptides. Those comprise inclusion list sequencing (directed sequencing), spectral library matching, and targeted proteomics (17). These methods explicitly use the information contained in empirical fragment ion spectra, including the fragment ion signal intensity to identify the target peptide. For these methods, it is therefore of highest importance to accurately control and quantify the degree of reproducibility of the fragment ion spectra across experiments, instruments, labs, methods, and to quantitatively assess the similarity of spectra. To date, dot product (18–24), its corresponding arccosine spectral contrast angle (25–27) and (Pearson-like) spectral correlation (28–31), and other geometrical distance measures (18, 32), have been used in the literature for assessing spectral similarity. These measures have been used in different contexts including shotgun spectra clustering (19, 26), spectral library searching (18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27–29), cross-instrument fragmentation comparisons (22, 30) and for scoring transitions in targeted proteomics analyses such as selected reaction monitoring (SRM)¹ (23, 31). However, to our knowledge, those scores have never been objectively benchmarked for their performance in discriminating well-defined levels of dissimilarities between spectra. In particular, similarity scores obtained by different methods have not yet been compared for targeted proteomics applications, where the sensitive discrimination of highly similar spectra is critical for the confident identification of targeted peptides.In this study, we have developed a method to objectively assess the similarity of fragment ion spectra. We provide an open-source toolset that supports these analyses. Using a computationally generated benchmark spectral library with increasing levels of well-controlled spectral dissimilarity, we performed a comprehensive and unbiased comparison of the performance of the main scores used to assess spectral similarity in mass spectrometry.We then exemplify how this method, in conjunction with its corresponding benchmarked perturbation spectra set, can be applied to answer several relevant questions for MS-based proteomics. As a first application, we show that it can efficiently assess the absolute levels of peptide fragmentation variability inherent to any given mass spectrometer. By comparing the instrument''s intrinsic fragmentation conservation distribution to that of the benchmarked perturbation spectra set, nominal values of spectral similarity scores can indeed be translated into a more directly understandable percentage of variability inherent to the instrument fragmentation. As a second application, we show that the method can be used to derive an absolute measure to estimate the conservation of peptide fragmentation between instruments or across proteomics methods. This allowed us to quantitatively evaluate, for example, the transferability of fragment ion spectra acquired by data dependent analysis in a first instrument into a fragment/transition assay list used for targeted proteomics applications (e.g. SRM or targeted extraction of data independent acquisition SWATH MS (33)) on another instrument. Third, we used the method to probe the fragmentation patterns of peptides carrying a post-translation modification (e.g. phosphorylation) by comparing the spectra of modified peptide with those of their unmodified counterparts. Finally, we used the method to determine the overall level of fragmentation conservation that is required to support target-decoy discrimination and peptide identification in targeted proteomics approaches such as SRM and SWATH MS.     

Identification and Quantification of Glycoproteins Using Ion-Pairing Normal-phase Liquid Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

Glycoprotein structure determination and quantification by MS requires efficient isolation of glycopeptides from a proteolytic digest of complex protein mixtures. Here we describe that the use of acids as ion-pairing reagents in normal-phase chromatography (IP-NPLC) considerably increases the hydrophobicity differences between non-glycopeptides and glycopeptides, thereby resulting in the reproducible isolation of N-linked high mannose type and sialylated glycopeptides from the tryptic digest of a ribonuclease B and fetuin mixture. The elution order of non-glycopeptides relative to glycopeptides in IP-NPLC is predictable by their hydrophobicity values calculated using the Wimley-White water/octanol hydrophobicity scale. O-linked glycopeptides can be efficiently isolated from fetuin tryptic digests using IP-NPLC when N-glycans are first removed with PNGase. IP-NPLC recovers close to 100% of bacterial N-linked glycopeptides modified with non-sialylated heptasaccharides from tryptic digests of periplasmic protein extracts from Campylobacter jejuni 11168 and its pglD mutant. Label-free nano-flow reversed-phase LC-MS is used for quantification of differentially expressed glycopeptides from the C. jejuni wild-type and pglD mutant followed by identification of these glycoproteins using multiple stage tandem MS. This method further confirms the acetyltransferase activity of PglD and demonstrates for the first time that heptasaccharides containing monoacetylated bacillosamine are transferred to proteins in both the wild-type and mutant strains. We believe that IP-NPLC will be a useful tool for quantitative glycoproteomics.Protein glycosylation is a biologically significant and complex post-translational modification, involved in cell-cell and receptor-ligand interactions (1–4). In fact, clinical biomarkers and therapeutic targets are often glycoproteins (5–9). Comprehensive glycoprotein characterization, involving glycosylation site identification, glycan structure determination, site occupancy, and glycan isoform distribution, is a technical challenge particularly for quantitative profiling of complex protein mixtures (10–13). Both N- and O-glycans are structurally heterogeneous (i.e. a single site may have different glycans attached or be only partially occupied). Therefore, the MS¹ signals from glycopeptides originating from a glycoprotein are often weaker than from non-glycopeptides. In addition, the ionization efficiency of glycopeptides is low compared with that of non-glycopeptides and is often suppressed in the presence of non-glycopeptides (11–13). When the MS signals of glycopeptides are relatively high in simple protein digests then diagnostic sugar oxonium ion fragments produced by, for example, front-end collisional activation can be used to detect them. However, when peptides and glycopeptides co-elute, parent ion scanning is required to selectively detect the glycopeptides (14). This can be problematic in terms of sensitivity, especially for detecting glycopeptides in digests of complex protein extracts.Isolation of glycopeptides from proteolytic digests of complex protein mixtures can greatly enhance the MS signals of glycopeptides using reversed-phase LC-ESI-MS (RPLC-ESI-MS) or MALDI-MS (15–24). Hydrazide chemistry is used to isolate, identify, and quantify N-linked glycopeptides effectively, but this method involves lengthy chemical procedures and does not preserve the glycan moieties thereby losing valuable information on glycan structure and site occupancy (15–17). Capturing glycopeptides with lectins has been widely used, but restricted specificities and unspecific binding are major drawbacks of this method (18–21). Under reversed-phase LC conditions, glycopeptides from tryptic digests of gel-separated glycoproteins have been enriched using graphite powder medium (22). In this case, however, a second digestion with proteinase K is required for trimming down the peptide moieties of tryptic glycopeptides so that the glycopeptides (typically <5 amino acid residues) essentially resemble the glycans with respect to hydrophilicity for subsequent separation. Moreover, the short peptide sequences of the proteinase K digest are often inadequate for de novo sequencing of the glycopeptides.Glycopeptide enrichment under normal-phase LC (NPLC) conditions has been demonstrated using various hydrophilic media and different capture and elution conditions (23–28). NPLC allows either direct enrichment of peptides modified by various N-linked glycan structures using a ZIC®-HILIC column (23–27) or targeting sialylated glycopeptides using a titanium dioxide micro-column (28). However, NPLC is neither effective for enriching less hydrophilic glycopeptides, e.g. the five high mannose type glycopeptides modified by 7–11 monosaccharide units from a tryptic digest of ribonuclease b (RNase B), nor for enriching O-linked glycopeptides of bovine fetuin using a ZIC-HILIC column (23). The use of Sepharose medium for enriching glycopeptides yielded only modest recovery of glycopeptides (28). In addition, binding of hydrophilic non-glycopeptides with these hydrophilic media contaminates the enriched glycopeptides (23, 28).We have recently developed an ion-pairing normal-phase LC (IP-NPLC) method to enrich glycopeptides from complex tryptic digests using Sepharose medium and salts or bases as ion-pairing reagents (29). Though reasonably effective the technique still left room for significant improvement. For example, the method demonstrated relatively modest glycopeptide selectivity, providing only 16% recovery for high mannose type glycopeptides (29). Here we report on a new IP-NPLC method using acids as ion-pairing reagents and polyhydroxyethyl aspartamide (A) as the stationary phase for the effective isolation of tryptic glycopeptides. The method was developed and evaluated using a tryptic digest of RNase B and fetuin mixture. In addition, we demonstrate that O-linked glycopeptides can be effectively isolated from a fetuin tryptic digest by IP-NPLC after removal of the N-linked glycans by PNGase F.The new IP-NPLC method was used to enrich N-linked glycopeptides from the tryptic digests of protein extracts of wild-type (wt) and PglD mutant strains of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC 11168. C. jejuni has a unique N-glycosylation system that glycosylates periplasmic and inner membrane proteins containing the extended N-linked sequon, D/E-X-N-X-S/T, where X is any amino acid other than proline (30–32). The N-linked glycan of C. jejuni has been previously determined to be GalNAc-α1,4-GalNAc-α1,4-[Glcβ1,3]-GalNAc-α1,4-GalNAc-α1,4-GalNAc-α1,3-Bac-β1 (BacGalNAc₅Glc residue mass: 1406 Da), where Bac is 2,4-diacetamido-2,4,6-trideoxyglucopyranose (30). In addition, the glycan structure of C. jejuni is conserved, unlike in eukaryotic systems (30–32). IP-NPLC recovered close to 100% of the bacterial N-linked glycopeptides with virtually no contamination of non-glycopeptides. Furthermore, we demonstrate for the first time that acetylation of bacillosamine is incomplete in the wt using IP-NPLC and label-free MS.     

Development of a Novel Cross-linking Strategy for Fast and Accurate Identification of Cross-linked Peptides of Protein Complexes

Knowledge of elaborate structures of protein complexes is fundamental for understanding their functions and regulations. Although cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) has been presented as a feasible strategy for structural elucidation of large multisubunit protein complexes, this method has proven challenging because of technical difficulties in unambiguous identification of cross-linked peptides and determination of cross-linked sites by MS analysis. In this work, we developed a novel cross-linking strategy using a newly designed MS-cleavable cross-linker, disuccinimidyl sulfoxide (DSSO). DSSO contains two symmetric collision-induced dissociation (CID)-cleavable sites that allow effective identification of DSSO-cross-linked peptides based on their distinct fragmentation patterns unique to cross-linking types (i.e. interlink, intralink, and dead end). The CID-induced separation of interlinked peptides in MS/MS permits MS³ analysis of single peptide chain fragment ions with defined modifications (due to DSSO remnants) for easy interpretation and unambiguous identification using existing database searching tools. Integration of data analyses from three generated data sets (MS, MS/MS, and MS³) allows high confidence identification of DSSO cross-linked peptides. The efficacy of the newly developed DSSO-based cross-linking strategy was demonstrated using model peptides and proteins. In addition, this method was successfully used for structural characterization of the yeast 20 S proteasome complex. In total, 13 non-redundant interlinked peptides of the 20 S proteasome were identified, representing the first application of an MS-cleavable cross-linker for the characterization of a multisubunit protein complex. Given its effectiveness and simplicity, this cross-linking strategy can find a broad range of applications in elucidating the structural topology of proteins and protein complexes.Proteins form stable and dynamic multisubunit complexes under different physiological conditions to maintain cell viability and normal cell homeostasis. Detailed knowledge of protein interactions and protein complex structures is fundamental to understanding how individual proteins function within a complex and how the complex functions as a whole. However, structural elucidation of large multisubunit protein complexes has been difficult because of a lack of technologies that can effectively handle their dynamic and heterogeneous nature. Traditional methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis and x-ray crystallography can yield detailed information on protein structures; however, NMR spectroscopy requires large quantities of pure protein in a specific solvent, whereas x-ray crystallography is often limited by the crystallization process.In recent years, chemical cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) has become a powerful method for studying protein interactions (1–3). Chemical cross-linking stabilizes protein interactions through the formation of covalent bonds and allows the detection of stable, weak, and/or transient protein-protein interactions in native cells or tissues (4–9). In addition to capturing protein interacting partners, many studies have shown that chemical cross-linking can yield low resolution structural information about the constraints within a molecule (2, 3, 10) or protein complex (11–13). The application of chemical cross-linking, enzymatic digestion, and subsequent mass spectrometric and computational analyses for the elucidation of three-dimensional protein structures offers distinct advantages over traditional methods because of its speed, sensitivity, and versatility. Identification of cross-linked peptides provides distance constraints that aid in constructing the structural topology of proteins and/or protein complexes. Although this approach has been successful, effective detection and accurate identification of cross-linked peptides as well as unambiguous assignment of cross-linked sites remain extremely challenging due to their low abundance and complicated fragmentation behavior in MS analysis (2, 3, 10, 14). Therefore, new reagents and methods are urgently needed to allow unambiguous identification of cross-linked products and to improve the speed and accuracy of data analysis to facilitate its application in structural elucidation of large protein complexes.A number of approaches have been developed to facilitate MS detection of low abundance cross-linked peptides from complex mixtures. These include selective enrichment using affinity purification with biotinylated cross-linkers (15–17) and click chemistry with alkyne-tagged (18) or azide-tagged (19, 20) cross-linkers. In addition, Staudinger ligation has recently been shown to be effective for selective enrichment of azide-tagged cross-linked peptides (21). Apart from enrichment, detection of cross-linked peptides can be achieved by isotope-labeled (22–24), fluorescently labeled (25), and mass tag-labeled cross-linking reagents (16, 26). These methods can identify cross-linked peptides with MS analysis, but interpretation of the data generated from interlinked peptides (two peptides connected with the cross-link) by automated database searching remains difficult. Several bioinformatics tools have thus been developed to interpret MS/MS data and determine interlinked peptide sequences from complex mixtures (12, 14, 27–32). Although promising, further developments are still needed to make such data analyses as robust and reliable as analyzing MS/MS data of single peptide sequences using existing database searching tools (e.g. Protein Prospector, Mascot, or SEQUEST).Various types of cleavable cross-linkers with distinct chemical properties have been developed to facilitate MS identification and characterization of cross-linked peptides. These include UV photocleavable (33), chemical cleavable (19), isotopically coded cleavable (24), and MS-cleavable reagents (16, 26, 34–38). MS-cleavable cross-linkers have received considerable attention because the resulting cross-linked products can be identified based on their characteristic fragmentation behavior observed during MS analysis. Gas-phase cleavage sites result in the detection of a “reporter” ion (26), single peptide chain fragment ions (35–38), or both reporter and fragment ions (16, 34). In each case, further structural characterization of the peptide product ions generated during the cleavage reaction can be accomplished by subsequent MSⁿ1 analysis. Among these linkers, the “fixed charge” sulfonium ion-containing cross-linker developed by Lu et al. (37) appears to be the most attractive as it allows specific and selective fragmentation of cross-linked peptides regardless of their charge and amino acid composition based on their studies with model peptides.Despite the availability of multiple types of cleavable cross-linkers, most of the applications have been limited to the study of model peptides and single proteins. Additionally, complicated synthesis and fragmentation patterns have impeded most of the known MS-cleavable cross-linkers from wide adaptation by the community. Here we describe the design and characterization of a novel and simple MS-cleavable cross-linker, DSSO, and its application to model peptides and proteins and the yeast 20 S proteasome complex. In combination with new software developed for data integration, we were able to identify DSSO-cross-linked peptides from complex peptide mixtures with speed and accuracy. Given its effectiveness and simplicity, we anticipate a broader application of this MS-cleavable cross-linker in the study of structural topology of other protein complexes using cross-linking and mass spectrometry.     

From Whole-body Sections Down to Cellular Level,Multiscale Imaging of Phospholipids by MALDI Mass Spectrometry

Significant progress in instrumentation and sample preparation approaches have recently expanded the potential of MALDI imaging mass spectrometry to the analysis of phospholipids and other endogenous metabolites naturally occurring in tissue specimens. Here we explore some of the requirements necessary for the successful analysis and imaging of phospholipids from thin tissue sections of various dimensions by MALDI time-of-flight mass spectrometry. We address methodology issues relative to the imaging of whole-body sections such as those cut from model laboratory animals, sections of intermediate dimensions typically prepared from individual organs, as well as the requirements for imaging areas of interests from these sections at a cellular scale spatial resolution. We also review existing limitations of MALDI imaging MS technology relative to compound identification. Finally, we conclude with a perspective on important issues relative to data exploitation and management that need to be solved to maximize biological understanding of the tissue specimen investigated.Since its introduction in the late 90s (1), MALDI imaging mass spectrometry (MS) technology has witnessed a phenomenal expansion. Initially introduced for the mapping of intact proteins from fresh frozen tissue sections (2), imaging MS is now routinely applied to a wide range of different compounds including peptides, proteins, lipids, metabolites, and xenobiotics (3–7). Numerous compound-specific sample preparation protocols and analytical strategies have been developed. These include tissue sectioning and handling (8–14), automated matrix deposition approaches and data acquisition strategies (15–21), and the emergence of in situ tissue chemistries (22–25). Originally performed on sections cut from fresh frozen tissue specimens, methodologies incorporating an in situ enzymatic digestion step prior to matrix application have been optimized to access the proteome locked in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue biopsies (25–29). The possibility to use tissues preserved using non-cross-linking approaches has also been demonstrated (30–32). These methodologies are of high importance for the study of numerous diseases because they potentially allow the retrospective analysis for biomarker validation and discovery of the millions of tissue biopsies currently stored worldwide in tissue banks and repositories.In the past decade, instrumentation for imaging MS has also greatly evolved. Whereas the first MS images were collected with time-of-flight instruments (TOF) capable of repetition rates of a few hertz, modern systems are today capable of acquiring data in the kilohertz range and above with improved sensitivity, mass resolving power, and accuracy, significantly reducing acquisition time and improving image quality (33, 34). Beyond time-of-flight analyzers, other MALDI-based instruments have been used such as ion traps (35–37), Qq TOF instruments (38–40), and trap-TOF (16, 41). Ion mobility technology has also been used in conjunction with imaging MS (42–44). More recently, MALDI FT/ICR and Orbitrap mass spectrometers have been demonstrated to be extremely valuable instruments for the performance of imaging MS at very high mass resolving power (45–47). These non-TOF-based systems have proven to be extremely powerful for the imaging of lower molecular weight compounds such as lipids, drugs, and metabolites. Home-built instrumentation and analytical approaches to probe tissues at higher spatial resolution (1–10 μm) have also been described (48–50). In parallel to instrumentation developments, automated data acquisition, image visualization, and processing software packages have now also been developed by most manufacturers.To date, a wide range of biological systems have been studied using imaging MS as a primary methodology. Of strong interest are the organization and identification of the molecular composition of diseased tissues in direct correlation with the underlying histology and how it differs from healthy tissues. Such an approach has been used for the study of cancers (51–54), neurologic disorders (55–57), and other diseases (58, 59). The clinical potential of the imaging MS technology is enormous (7, 60, 61). Results give insights into the onset and progression of diseases, identify novel sets of disease-specific markers, and can provide a molecular confirmation of diagnosis as well as aide in outcome prediction (62–64). Imaging MS has also been extensively used to study the development, functioning, and aging of different organs such as the kidney, prostate, epididymis, and eye lens (65–70). Beyond the study of isolated tissues or organs, whole-body sections from several model animals such as leeches, mice, and rats have been investigated (71–74). For these analyses, specialized instrumentation and protocols are necessary for tissue sectioning and handling (72, 73). Whole-body imaging MS opens the door to the study of the localization and accumulation of administered pharmaceuticals and their known metabolites at the level of entire organisms as well as the monitoring of their efficacy or toxicity as a function of time or dose (72, 73, 75, 76).There is considerable interest in determining the identification and localization of small biomolecules such as lipids in tissues because they are involved in many essential biological functions including cell signaling, energy storage, and membrane structure and function. Defects in lipid metabolism play a role in many diseases such as muscular dystrophy and cardiovascular disease. Phospholipids in tissues have been intensively studied by several groups (37, 40, 77–83). In this respect, for optimal recovery of signal, several variables such as the choice of matrix for both imaging and fragmentation, solvent system, and instrument polarity have been investigated (20, 84). Particularly, the use of lithium cation adducts to facilitate phospholipid identification by tandem MS directly from tissue has also been reported (85). Of significant interest is the recent emergence of two new solvent-free matrix deposition approaches that perform exceptionally well for phospholipid imaging analyses. The first approach, described by Hankin et al. (86), consists in depositing the matrix on the sections through a sublimation process. The described sublimation system consists of sublimation glassware, a heated sand or oil bath (100–200 °C), and a primary vacuum pump (∼5 × 10⁻² torr). Within a few minutes of initiating the sublimation process, an exceptionally homogeneous film of matrix forms on the section. The thickness of the matrix may be controlled by regulating pressure, temperature, and sublimation time. The second approach, described by Puolitaival et al.(87), uses a fine mesh sieve (≤20 μm) to filter finely ground matrix on the tissue sections. Agitation of the sieve results in passage of the matrix through the mesh and the deposition of a fairly homogeneous layer of submicrometer matrix crystals of the surface of the sections. The matrix density on the sections is controlled by direct observation using a standard light microscope. This matrix deposition approach was also found to be ideal to image certain drug compounds (88, 89). Both strategies allow very rapid production of homogeneous matrix coatings on tissue sections with a fairly inexpensive setup. Signal recovery was found to be comparable with those obtained by conventional spray deposition. With the appropriate size sublimation device or sieve, larger sections with dimensions of several centimeters such as those cut from mouse or rat whole bodies can also be rapidly and homogeneously coated.Here we present several examples of MALDI imaging MS of phospholipids from tissue sections using TOF mass spectrometers over a wide range of dimensions from whole-body sections (several centimeters), to individual organs (several millimeters), down to high spatial resolution imaging of selected tissue areas (hundreds of micrometers) at 10-μm lateral resolution and below. For all of these dimension ranges, technological considerations and practical aspects are discussed. In light of the imaging MS results, we also address issues faced for compound identification by tandem MS analysis performed directly on the sections. Finally, we discuss under “Perspective” our vision of the future of the field as well as the technological improvements and analytical tools that need to be improved upon and developed.     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]     

Cerebrospinal Fluid Peptides as Potential Parkinson Disease Biomarkers: A Staged Pipeline for Discovery and Validation

Finding robust biomarkers for Parkinson disease (PD) is currently hampered by inherent technical limitations associated with imaging or antibody-based protein assays. To circumvent the challenges, we adapted a staged pipeline, starting from our previous proteomic profiling followed by high-throughput targeted mass spectrometry (MS), to identify peptides in human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for PD diagnosis and disease severity correlation. In this multicenter study consisting of training and validation sets, a total of 178 subjects were randomly selected from a retrospective cohort, matching age and sex between PD patients, healthy controls, and neurological controls with Alzheimer disease (AD). From ∼14,000 unique peptides displaying differences between PD and healthy control in proteomic investigations, 126 peptides were selected based on relevance and observability in CSF using bioinformatic analysis and MS screening, and then quantified by highly accurate and sensitive selected reaction monitoring (SRM) in the CSF of 30 PD patients versus 30 healthy controls (training set), followed by diagnostic (receiver operating characteristics) and disease severity correlation analyses. The most promising candidates were further tested in an independent cohort of 40 PD patients, 38 AD patients, and 40 healthy controls (validation set). A panel of five peptides (derived from SPP1, LRP1, CSF1R, EPHA4, and TIMP1) was identified to provide an area under curve (AUC) of 0.873 (sensitivity = 76.7%, specificity = 80.0%) for PD versus healthy controls in the training set. The performance was essentially confirmed in the validation set (AUC = 0.853, sensitivity = 82.5%, specificity = 82.5%). Additionally, this panel could also differentiate the PD and AD groups (AUC = 0.990, sensitivity = 95.0%, specificity = 97.4%). Furthermore, a combination of two peptides belonging to proteins TIMP1 and APLP1 significantly correlated with disease severity as determined by the Unified Parkinson''s Disease Rating Scale motor scores in both the training (r = 0.381, p = 0.038)j and the validation (r = 0.339, p = 0.032) sets. The novel panel of CSF peptides, if validated in independent cohorts, could be used to assist in clinical diagnosis of PD and has the potential to help monitoring or predicting disease progression.Parkinson disease (PD)¹, the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer disease (AD), afflicts roughly 2% of persons over the age of 65 years (1, 2). Currently, PD diagnosis is mainly based on observation of the cardinal motor indicators of the disease, patient response to drug treatment, and medical history (3, 4). There is an appreciable misdiagnosis rate (4), particularly at early disease stages. Additionally, no objective measure of disease progression or treatment effects has been established. Thus, objective, reliable, and reproducible biomarkers are clearly needed to aid in the diagnosis of PD and tracking or predicting the disease progression.The most sensitive tests developed to date are based on imaging modalities, which can detect functional and structural abnormalities even prior to the onset of motor dysfunction (5, 6). However, the usefulness of neuroimaging techniques is limited by high cost, limited accessibility, difficulty in reliable differentiation of PD from other atypical parkinsonian disorders and subjection to confounding factors such as medication and compensatory responses (4–7). Biochemical and molecular markers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and other body fluids have also been actively investigated (5, 8–12). The most extensively studied candidate in CSF is probably α-synuclein, the major protein component of Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites, the pathological hallmarks of PD (2). The current consensus is that CSF α-synuclein concentrations are generally lower in patients with PD compared with controls (5, 8–10); the sensitivity and specificity, however, appear to be only moderate, and no correlation with PD severity or progression has been observed (8, 9). Notably, all these CSF protein markers are measured using antibody-based assays, which are often associated with relatively high variability, particularly when different detection techniques (different antibodies, sample preparation, calibrators, etc.) are used, leading to discrepant results across laboratories (5). It should also be stressed that this high variability in immunoassays is not unique to PD, because similar difficulty is encountered in AD and other related disorders (13, 14).One strategy to avoid the inherent technical limitations associated with antibodies is to use alternative techniques in which unique peptides are selected and precisely quantified with mass spectrometry (MS) techniques, for example, accurate inclusion mass screening (AIMS) (15) and selected reaction monitoring (SRM) (16–18). To this end, in the last few years, we and others have utilized proteomic technologies to identify novel proteins and peptides associated with different disease states and stages (5, 6, 19–25). Using brain tissue or CSF, these unbiased proteomic profiling studies have revealed disease-related alterations in hundreds of peptides derived from many proteins (19–25). However, there are no quantitative assays for the majority of these candidate proteins/peptides, and development of such assays is limited by the lack of antibodies available for many of them. Thus, although a large library of potential peptide biomarkers has been developed, the vast majority never reach the stage of validation and clinical testing, hampered by the difficulty of de novo development of immunoassays, a process that is time consuming, prohibitively expensive to develop and very difficult to multiplex.In this study, we aim to establish a PD biomarker identification and verification pipeline, with the goal of prioritizing candidates and swiftly developing reliable quantitative assays. We focused on identifying peptides by SRM and AIMS, because these targeted proteomic technologies have been proposed as the basis of a viable biomarker pipeline (16) and have become a powerful tool in biomarker discovery because of their high sensitivity, accuracy and specificity. SRM, in particular, has emerged as an alternative to immunoaffinity-based measurements of defined protein sets with excellent reproducibility across different laboratories and instrument platforms (17, 18). The staged pipeline in the current investigation (Fig. 1) includes: (1) data-dependent and bioinformatic prioritization of thousands of candidate biomarkers identified in our previous profiling studies, (2) de novo development of antibody-free multiplex SRM assays to reliably measure tens to hundreds of peptides simultaneously, and (3) multiplex biomarker verification studies allowing identification and validation of models or panels of candidates in independent sample sets, two of which were used in this study.Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Overview of the workflow used for CSF peptide biomarker discovery and validation. AD, Alzheimer disease; AIMS, accurate inclusion mass screening; CO, healthy controls; DDA, data-dependent acquisition; PD, Parkinson disease; SRM, selected reaction monitoring.