Sgt1 Dimerization Is Negatively Regulated by Protein Kinase CK2-mediated Phosphorylation at Ser361

The kinetochore, which consists of centromere DNA and structural proteins, is essential for proper chromosome segregation in eukaryotes. In budding yeast, Sgt1 and Hsp90 are required for the binding of Skp1 to Ctf13 (a component of the core kinetochore complex CBF3) and therefore for the assembly of CBF3. We have previously shown that Sgt1 dimerization is important for this kinetochore assembly mechanism. In this study, we report that protein kinase CK2 phosphorylates Ser³⁶¹ on Sgt1, and this phosphorylation inhibits Sgt1 dimerization.The kinetochore is a structural protein complex located in the centromeric region of the chromosome coupled to spindle microtubules (1, 2). The kinetochore generates a signal to arrest cells during mitosis when it is not properly attached to microtubules, thereby preventing chromosome missegregation, which can lead to aneuploidy (3, 4). The molecular structure of the kinetochore complex of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been well characterized; it is composed of more than 70 proteins, many of which are conserved in mammals (2).The centromere DNA in the budding yeast is a 125-bp region that contains three conserved regions, CDEI, CDEII, and CDEIII (5, 6). CDEIII (25 bp) is essential for centromere function (7) and is bound to a key component of the centromere, the CBF3 complex. The CBF3 complex contains four proteins, Ndc10, Cep3, Ctf13 (8–15), and Skp1 (14, 15), all essential for viability. Mutations in any of the CBF3 proteins abolish the ability of CDEIII to bind to CBF3 (16, 17). All of the kinetochore proteins, except the CDEI-binding Cbf1 (18–20), localize to the kinetochores in a CBF3-dependent manner (2). Thus, CBF3 is a fundamental kinetochore complex, and its mechanism of assembly is of great interest.We have previously found that Sgt1 and Skp1 activate Ctf13; thus, they are required for assembly of the CBF3 complex (21). The molecular chaperone Hsp90 is also required to form the active Ctf13-Skp1 complex (22). Sgt1 has two highly conserved motifs that are required for protein-protein interaction: the tetratricopeptide repeat (21) and the CHORD protein and Sgt1-specific motif. We and others have found that both domains are important for the interaction of Sgt1 with Hsp90 (23–26), which is required for assembly of the core kinetochore complex. This interaction is an initial step in kinetochore activation (24, 26, 27), which is conserved between yeast and humans (28, 29).We have recently shown that Sgt1 dimerization is important for Sgt1-Skp1 binding and therefore for kinetochore assembly (30). In this study, we have found that protein kinase CK2 phosphorylates Sgt1 at Ser³⁶¹, and this phosphorylation inhibits Sgt1 dimerization. Therefore, CK2 appears to regulate kinetochore assembly negatively in budding yeast.     

Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase-�� and Src Functionally Link Focal Adhesions to the Endoplasmic Reticulum to Mediate Interleukin-1-induced Ca2+ Signaling

Calcium (Ca²⁺) signaling by the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-1 (IL-1) is dependent on focal adhesions, which contain diverse structural and signaling proteins including protein phosphatases. We examined here the role of protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) α in regulating IL-1-induced Ca²⁺ signaling in fibroblasts. IL-1 promoted recruitment of PTPα to focal adhesions and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) fractions, as well as tyrosine phosphorylation of the ER Ca²⁺ release channel IP₃R. In response to IL-1, catalytically active PTPα was required for Ca²⁺ release from the ER, Src-dependent phosphorylation of IP₃R1 and accumulation of IP₃R1 in focal adhesions. In pulldown assays and immunoprecipitations PTPα was required for the association of PTPα with IP₃R1 and c-Src, and this association was increased by IL-1. Collectively, these data indicate that PTPα acts as an adaptor to mediate functional links between focal adhesions and the ER that enable IL-1-induced Ca²⁺ signaling.The interleukin-1 (IL-1)³ family of pro-inflammatory cytokines mediates host responses to infection and injury. Impaired control of IL-1 signaling leads to chronic inflammation and destruction of extracellular matrices (1, 2), as seen in pathological conditions such as pulmonary fibrosis (3), rheumatoid arthritis (4, 5), and periodontitis (6). IL-1 elicits multiple signaling programs, some of which trigger Ca²⁺ release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as well as expression of multiple cytokines and inflammatory factors including c-Fos and c-Jun (7, 8), and matrix metalloproteinases (9, 10), which mediate extracellular matrix degradation via mitogen-activated protein kinase-regulated pathways (11).In anchorage-dependent cells including fibroblasts and chondrocytes, focal adhesions (FAs) are required for IL-1-induced Ca²⁺ release from the ER and activation of ERK (12–14). FAs are actin-enriched adhesive domains composed of numerous (>50) scaffolding and signaling proteins (15–17). Many FA proteins are tyrosine-phosphorylated, including paxillin, focal adhesion kinase, and src family kinases, all of which are crucial for the assembly and disassembly of FAs (18–21). Protein-tyrosine phosphorylation plays a central role in regulating many cellular processes including adhesion (22, 23), motility (24), survival (25), and signal transduction (26–29). Phosphorylation of proteins by kinases is balanced by protein-tyrosine phosphatases (PTP), which can enhance or attenuate downstream signaling by dephosphorylation of tyrosine residues (30–32).PTPs can be divided into two main categories: receptor-like and intracellular PTPs (33). Two receptor-like PTPs have been localized to FA (leukocyte common antigen-related molecule and PTPα). Leukocyte common antigen-related molecule can dephosphorylate and mediate degradation of p130^cas, which ultimately leads to cell death (34, 35). PTPα contains a heavily glycosylated extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain, and two intracellular phosphatase domains (33, 36). The amino-terminal domain predominantly mediates catalytic activity, whereas the carboxyl-terminal domain serves a regulatory function (37, 38). PTPα is enriched in FA (23) and is instrumental in regulating FA dynamics (39) via activation of c-Src/Fyn kinases by dephosphorylating the inhibitory carboxyl tyrosine residue, namely Tyr⁵²⁹ (22, 40–42) and facilitation of integrin-dependent assembly of Src-FAK and Fyn-FAK complexes that regulate cell motility (43). Although PTPα has been implicated in formation and remodeling of FAs (44, 45), the role of PTPα in FA-dependent signaling is not defined.Ca²⁺ release from the ER is a critical step in integrin-dependent IL-1 signal transduction and is required for downstream activation of ERK (13, 46). The release of Ca²⁺ from the ER depends on the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor (IP₃R), which is an IP₃-gated Ca²⁺ channel (47). All of the IP₃R subtypes (subtypes 1–3) have been localized to the ER, as well as other the plasma membrane and other endomembranes (48–50). Further, IP₃R may associate with FAs, enabling the anchorage of the ER to FAs (51, 52). However, the molecule(s) that provide the structural link for this association has not been defined.FA-restricted, IL-1-triggered signal transduction in anchorage-dependent cells may rely on interacting proteins that are enriched in FAs and the ER (53). Here, we examined the possibility that PTPα associates with c-Src and IP₃R to functionally link FAs to the ER, thereby enabling IL-1 signal transduction.     

Fibronectin Binds to and Induces Conformational Change in a Disordered Region of Leptospiral Immunoglobulin-like Protein B

Leptospira interrogans is a pathogenic spirochete that causes disease in both humans and animals. LigB (Leptospiral immunoglobulin-like protein B) contributes to the binding of Leptospira to extracellular matrix proteins such as fibronectin (Fn), fibrinogen, laminin, and collagen. A high affinity Fn-binding region of LigB has been recently localized to LigBCen2, which contains the partial eleventh and full twelfth immunoglobulin-like repeats (LigBCen2R) and 47 amino acids of the non-repeat region (LigBCen2NR) of LigB. In this study, LigBCen2NR was shown to bind to the N-terminal domain (NTD) of Fn (K_D = 379 nm) by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and isothermal titration calorimetry. Interestingly, this sequence was not observed to adopt secondary structure by far UV circular dichroism or by differential scanning calorimetry, in agreement with computer-based secondary structure predictions. A low partition coefficient (K_av) measured with gel permeation chromatography, a high hydrodynamic radius (R_h) measured with dynamic light scattering, and the insensitivity of the intrinsic viscosity to guanidine hydrochloride treatment all suggest that LigBCen2NR possesses an extended and disordered structure. Two-dimensional ¹⁵N-¹H HSQC NMR spectra of intact LigBCen2 in the absence and presence of NTD are consistent with these observations, suggesting the presence of both a β-rich region and an unstructured region in LigBCen2 and that the latter of these selectively interacts with NTD. Upon binding to NTD, LigBCen2NR was observed by CD to adopt a β-strand-rich structure, suggestive of the known β-zipper mode of NTD binding.Leptospira interrogans is a pathogenic spirochete that causes leptospirosis throughout the world, especially in developing countries but also in regions of the United States where it has reemerged (1). Weil''s syndrome, a severe form of this disease, is an acute febrile illness associated with multiorgan damage, including liver failure (jaundice), renal failure (nephritis), pulmonary hemorrhage, and meningitis (1), and has a 15% mortality rate if not treated (2). The molecular pathogenesis of leptospirosis is poorly understood, and the bacterial virulence factors involved are largely unknown. Recently, several potential Leptospira virulence factors have been described, including sphingomyelinases, serine proteases, zinc-dependent proteases, and collagenase (3); LipL32 (4); lipopolysaccharide (5); a novel factor H, laminin, and Fn-binding protein (Lsa24 or Len) (6–8); Loa 22 (9); and Lig (Leptospiral immunoglobulin-like) proteins (10–12).Lig proteins, including LigA, LigB, and LigC, contain multiple immunoglobulin-like repeat domains (13 in LigA, 12 in LigB and LigC) (10–12). Interestingly, the first 630 residues, from the N terminus to the first half of the seventh immunoglobulin-like domain, are conserved between LigA and LigB, but the rest of the immunoglobulin-like domains are variable (10–12) between the two proteins. Also, a non-immunoglobulin-like repeat region found on the C-terminal tail of LigB is not found in LigA (10–12). Lig proteins are categorized as microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs)² due to their ability to bind to eukaryotic cells (13) through their interactions with extracellular matrix components, including fibronectin (Fn), laminin, collagens, elastin, and tropoelastin (13, 14, 45). Previously, a high affinity Fn-binding region was localized to LigBCen2, which includes the partial eleventh and complete twelfth immunoglobulin-like repeat region and the first 47 amino acids of the non-repeat regions of LigB (15). LigBCen2 was shown to bind to both the N-terminal domain (NTD) and the gelatin binding domain (GBD) of Fn. The addition of calcium induces a conformational change in LigBCen2 and enhances binding between LigBCen2 and the NTD of Fn (15).The first step in the process of bacterial infection is cellular adhesion, mediated by bacterial adhesins interacting with various components of the extracellular matrix (16). Known interaction modes between Fn and bacterial Fn-binding proteins include the β-zipper (17, 18) and the cationic cradle (19). It was recently discovered that the Fn-binding domains in certain Fn-binding proteins are disordered and extended but gain structure upon binding to the NTD of Fn (20–22).We have performed a fine-mapping study of the NTD-binding site on LigBCen2 and identified this site as LigBCen2NR, a portion of the non-repeat region (amino acids 1119–1165). The addition of NTD promotes the folding of LigBCen2NR from a disordered and extended structure to a folded structure. This finding is notable, since LigBCen2NR is located in the non-immunoglobulin-like region of LigB, as compared with other Fn-binding proteins, such as Staphylococcus aureus FnbpA and FnbpB (23), Streptococcus dysgalactiae FnBB (17), and Streptococcus pyogenes SfbI and SfbII (24). Thus, the binding mode appears to be similar to the known β-zipper mechanism but unique in sequence-specific interactions. This finding provides the fundamental groundwork for the development of a therapeutic agent to target this interaction in order to prevent or treat Leptospira infection.     

Increased Lipid Accumulation in the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii sta7-10 Starchless Isoamylase Mutant and Increased Carbohydrate Synthesis in Complemented Strains

The accumulation of bioenergy carriers was assessed in two starchless mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (the sta6 [ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase] and sta7-10 [isoamylase] mutants), a control strain (CC124), and two complemented strains of the sta7-10 mutant. The results indicate that the genetic blockage of starch synthesis in the sta6 and sta7-10 mutants increases the accumulation of lipids on a cellular basis during nitrogen deprivation relative to that in the CC124 control as determined by conversion to fatty acid methyl esters. However, this increased level of lipid accumulation is energetically insufficient to completely offset the loss of cellular starch that is synthesized by CC124 during nitrogen deprivation. We therefore investigated acetate utilization and O₂ evolution to obtain further insights into the physiological adjustments utilized by the two starchless mutants in the absence of starch synthesis. The results demonstrate that both starchless mutants metabolize less acetate and have more severely attenuated levels of photosynthetic O₂ evolution than CC124, indicating that a decrease in overall anabolic processes is a significant physiological response in the starchless mutants during nitrogen deprivation. Interestingly, two independent sta7-10:STA7 complemented strains exhibited significantly greater quantities of cellular starch and lipid than CC124 during acclimation to nitrogen deprivation. Moreover, the complemented strains synthesized significant quantities of starch even when cultured in nutrient-replete medium.Microalgae are able to efficiently convert sunlight, water, and CO₂ into a variety of products suitable for renewable energy applications, including H₂, carbohydrates, and lipids (11, 12, 16, 21, 38, 41, 44). The unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has emerged as a model organism for studying algal physiology, photosynthesis, metabolism, nutrient stress, and the synthesis of bioenergy carriers (12, 15, 19, 24, 32). During acclimation to nitrogen deprivation, C. reinhardtii cells accumulate significant quantities of starch and form lipid bodies (4, 5, 8, 26, 28, 30, 34, 43, 46, 48). Despite the significance of these products in algal physiology and in biofuels applications, the metabolic, enzymatic, and regulatory mechanisms controlling the partitioning of metabolites into these distinct carbon stores in algae are poorly understood. Several C. reinhardtii starch mutants with various phenotypic changes in starch content and structure have been isolated (2,–4). Two of these, the sta6 and sta7 mutants, contain single-gene disruptions that result in “starchless” phenotypes with severely attenuated levels of starch granule accumulation (2, 4, 34, 39, 40, 48).The disrupted loci in the two isolated starchless mutants are distinct and each mutant has a unique phenotype (7, 40). In the sta6 mutant, the small, catalytic subunit of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase-SS) is disrupted (2, 4, 48), and this mutant accumulates less than 1% of the starch observed in wild-type (WT) cells under conditions of nitrogen deprivation. The sta7 mutant contains a disrupted isoamylase gene (7, 8, 10, 39, 40) and also has severely attenuated levels of starch, but it accumulates a soluble glycogen-like product (4, 9). In this study, we conducted an examination of the unique physiological acclimations that are utilized by these mutants to adapt to the loss of starch synthesis. As the genetic lesions in these two mutants are distinct and block starch synthesis via two very different mechanisms, we investigated the physiological consequences of starch inhibition in both of these mutants from a holistic bioenergy perspective, which included photosynthetic parameters and the overall yields of lipids and carbohydrates, the two primary bioenergy carriers in C. reinhardtii. Specifically, we examined whether the inability to synthesize starch would result in the accumulation of additional lipid, alter cellular growth or cell size, affect acetate utilization, and/or influence photosynthetic O₂ evolution. Our data indicate that both the sta6 (BAFJ5) and sta7 (sta7-10) mutants accumulate more lipid than the CC124 control during nitrogen deprivation. However, the additional lipid does not completely offset the loss of starch synthesis from a complete energetic perspective. Increased lipid accumulation during nitrogen stress has also been reported for a variety of starch mutants in recent papers (26, 27, 46). A significant feature in both of the starchless mutants studied here is that O₂ evolution and acetate utilization are diminished during nitrogen stress, which is undesirable from an overall bioenergy perspective. Remarkably, complementation of sta7-10 with genomic DNA encoding the wild-type isoamylase gene resulted in cells that were larger than those of the sta6, sta7-10, and CC124 strains, exhibited the highest total lipid levels during nitrogen deprivation, and overaccumulated starch even in nutrient-replete medium.     

Context-dependent Bcl-2/Bak Interactions Regulate Lymphoid Cell Apoptosis

The release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which leads to activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, is regulated by interactions of Bax and Bak with antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members. The factors that regulate these interactions are, at the present time, incompletely understood. Recent studies showing preferences in binding between synthetic Bcl-2 homology domain 3 and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members in vitro have suggested that the antiapoptotic proteins Mcl-1 and Bcl-x_L, but not Bcl-2, restrain proapoptotic Bak from inducing mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and apoptosis. Here we show that Bak protein has a much higher affinity than the 26-amino acid Bak Bcl-2 homology domain 3 for Bcl-2, that some naturally occurring Bcl-2 allelic variants have an affinity for full-length Bak that is only 3-fold lower than that of Mcl-1, and that endogenous levels of these Bcl-2 variants (which are as much as 40-fold more abundant than Mcl-1) restrain part of the Bak in intact lymphoid cells. In addition, we demonstrate that Bcl-2 variants can, depending on their affinity for Bak, substitute for Mcl-1 in protecting cells. Thus, the ability of Bcl-2 to protect cells from activated Bak depends on two important contextual variables, the identity of the Bcl-2 present and the amount expressed.The release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which leads to activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, is regulated by Bcl-2 family members (1–5). This group of proteins consists of three subgroups: Bax and Bak, which oligomerize upon death stimulation to form a putative pore in the outer mitochondrial membrane, thereby allowing efflux of cytochrome c and other mitochondrial intermembrane space components; Bcl-2, Bcl-x_L, Mcl-1, and other antiapoptotic homologs, which antagonize the effects of Bax and Bak; and BH3-only proteins² such as Bim, Bid, and Puma, which are proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members that share only limited homology with the other two groups in a single 15-amino acid domain (the BH3 domain, see Ref. 6). Although it is clear that BH3-only proteins serve as molecular sensors of various stresses and, when activated, trigger apoptosis (3, 6–11), the mechanism by which they do so remains incompletely understood. One current model suggests that BH3-only proteins trigger apoptosis solely by binding and neutralizing antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members, thereby causing them to release the activated Bax and Bak that are bound (reviewed in Refs. 9 and 10; see also Refs. 12 and 13), whereas another current model suggests that certain BH3-only proteins also directly bind to and activate Bax (reviewed in Ref. 3; see also Refs. 14–17). Whichever model turns out to be correct, both models agree that certain antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members can inhibit apoptosis, at least in part, by binding and neutralizing activated Bax and Bak before they permeabilize the outer mitochondrial membrane (13, 18, 19).Much of the information about the interactions between pro- and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members has been derived from the study of synthetic peptides corresponding to BH3 domains. In particular, these synthetic peptides have been utilized as surrogates for the full-length proapoptotic proteins during structure determinations (20–22) as well as in functional studies exploring the effect of purified BH3 domains on isolated mitochondria (14, 23) and on Bax-mediated permeabilization of lipid vesicles (15).Recent studies using these same peptides have suggested that interactions of the BH3 domains of Bax, Bak, and the BH3-only proteins with the “BH3 receptors” of the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members are not all equivalent. Surface plasmon resonance, a technique that is widely used to examine the interactions of biomolecules under cell-free conditions (24–26), has demonstrated that synthetic BH3 peptides of some BH3-only family members show striking preferences, with the Bad BH3 peptide binding to Bcl-2 and Bcl-x_L but not Mcl-1, and the Noxa BH3 peptide binding to Mcl-1 but not Bcl-2 or Bcl-x_L (27). Likewise, the Bak BH3 peptide exhibits selectivity, with high affinity for Bcl-x_L and Mcl-1 but not Bcl-2 (12). The latter results have led to a model in which Bcl-x_L and Mcl-1 restrain Bak and inhibit Bak-dependent apoptosis, whereas Bcl-2 does not (10).Because the Bak protein contains multiple recognizable domains in addition to its BH3 motif (28, 29), we compared the binding of Bak BH3 peptide and Bak protein to Bcl-2. Surface plasmon resonance demonstrated that Bcl-2 binds Bak protein with much higher affinity than the Bak 26-mer BH3 peptide. Further experiments demonstrated that the K_D for Bak differs among naturally occurring Bcl-2 sequence variants but is only 3-fold higher than that of Mcl-1 in some cases. In light of previous reports that Bcl-2 overexpression contributes to neoplastic transformation (30–33) and drug resistance (34–36) in lymphoid cells, we also examined Bcl-2 expression and Bak binding in a panel of neoplastic lymphoid cell lines. Results of these experiments demonstrated that Bcl-2 expression varies among different lymphoid cell lines but is up to 40-fold more abundant than Mcl-1. In lymphoid cell lines with abundant Bcl-2, Bak is detected in Bcl-2 as well as Mcl-1 immunoprecipitates; and Bak-dependent apoptosis induced by Mcl-1 down-regulation can be prevented by Bcl-2 overexpression. Collectively, these observations shed new light on the role of Bcl-2 in binding and neutralizing Bak.     

Dbf4-Cdc7 Phosphorylation of Mcm2 Is Required for Cell Growth

The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase (DDK) is required for the activation of the origins of replication, and DDK phosphorylates Mcm2 in vitro. We find that budding yeast Cdc7 alone exists in solution as a weakly active multimer. Dbf4 forms a likely heterodimer with Cdc7, and this species phosphorylates Mcm2 with substantially higher specific activity. Dbf4 alone binds tightly to Mcm2, whereas Cdc7 alone binds weakly to Mcm2, suggesting that Dbf4 recruits Cdc7 to phosphorylate Mcm2. DDK phosphorylates two serine residues of Mcm2 near the N terminus of the protein, Ser-164 and Ser-170. Expression of mcm2-S170A is lethal to yeast cells that lack endogenous MCM2 (mcm2Δ); however, this lethality is rescued in cells harboring the DDK bypass mutant mcm5-bob1. We conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is required for cell growth.The Cdc7 protein kinase is required throughout the yeast S phase to activate origins (1, 2). The S phase cyclin-dependent kinase also activates yeast origins of replication (3–5). It has been proposed that Dbf4 activates Cdc7 kinase in S phase, and that Dbf4 interaction with Cdc7 is essential for Cdc7 kinase activity (6). However, it is not known how Dbf4-Cdc7 (DDK)² acts during S phase to trigger the initiation of DNA replication. DDK has homologs in other eukaryotic species, and the role of Cdc7 in activation of replication origins during S phase may be conserved (7–10).The Mcm2-7 complex functions with Cdc45 and GINS to unwind DNA at a replication fork (11–15). A mutation of MCM5 (mcm5-bob1) bypasses the cellular requirements for DBF4 and CDC7 (16), suggesting a critical physiologic interaction between Dbf4-Cdc7 and Mcm proteins. DDK phosphorylates Mcm2 in vitro with proteins purified from budding yeast (17, 18) or human cells (19). Furthermore, there are mutants of MCM2 that show synthetic lethality with DBF4 mutants (6, 17), suggesting a biologically relevant interaction between DBF4 and MCM2. Nevertheless, the physiologic role of DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is a matter of dispute. In human cells, replacement of MCM2 DDK-phosphoacceptor residues with alanines inhibits DNA replication, suggesting that Dbf4-Cdc7 phosphorylation of Mcm2 in humans is important for DNA replication (20). In contrast, mutation of putative DDK phosphorylation sites at the N terminus of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mcm2 results in viable cells, suggesting that phosphorylation of S. pombe Mcm2 by DDK is not critical for cell growth (10).In budding yeast, Cdc7 is present at high levels in G₁ and S phase, whereas Dbf4 levels peak in S phase (18, 21, 22). Furthermore, budding yeast DDK binds to chromatin during S phase (6), and it has been shown that Dbf4 is required for Cdc7 binding to chromatin in budding yeast (23, 24), fission yeast (25), and Xenopus (9). Human and fission yeast Cdc7 are inert on their own (7, 8), but Dbf4-Cdc7 is active in phosphorylating Mcm proteins in budding yeast (6, 26), fission yeast (7), and human (8, 10). Based on these data, it has been proposed that Dbf4 activates Cdc7 kinase in S phase and that Dbf4 interaction with Cdc7 is essential for Cdc7 kinase activity (6, 9, 18, 21–24). However, a mechanistic analysis of how Dbf4 activates Cdc7 has not yet been accomplished. For example, the multimeric state of the active Dbf4-Cdc7 complex is currently disputed. A heterodimer of fission yeast Cdc7 (Hsk1) in complex with fission yeast Dbf4 (Dfp1) can phosphorylate Mcm2 (7). However, in budding yeast, oligomers of Cdc7 exist in the cell (27), and Dbf4-Cdc7 exists as oligomers of 180 and 300 kDa (27).DDK phosphorylates the N termini of human Mcm2 (19, 20, 28), human Mcm4 (10), budding yeast Mcm4 (26), and fission yeast Mcm6 (10). Although the sequences of the Mcm N termini are poorly conserved, the DDK sites identified in each study have neighboring acidic residues. The residues of budding yeast Mcm2 that are phosphorylated by DDK have not yet been identified.In this study, we find that budding yeast Cdc7 is weakly active as a multimer in phosphorylating Mcm2. However, a low molecular weight form of Dbf4-Cdc7, likely a heterodimer, has a higher specific activity for phosphorylation of Mcm2. Dbf4 or DDK, but not Cdc7, binds tightly to Mcm2, suggesting that Dbf4 recruits Cdc7 to Mcm2. DDK phosphorylates two serine residues of Mcm2, Ser-164 and Ser-170, in an acidic region of the protein. Mutation of Ser-170 is lethal to yeast cells, but this phenotype is rescued by the DDK bypass mutant mcm5-bob1. We conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Ser-170 of Mcm2 is required for budding yeast growth.     

Loop 2 Structure in Glycine and GABAA Receptors Plays a Key Role in Determining Ethanol Sensitivity

The present study tests the hypothesis that the structure of extracellular domain Loop 2 can markedly affect ethanol sensitivity in glycine receptors (GlyRs) and γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs). To test this, we mutated Loop 2 in the α1 subunit of GlyRs and in the γ subunit of α1β2γ2GABA_ARs and measured the sensitivity of wild type and mutant receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes to agonist, ethanol, and other agents using two-electrode voltage clamp. Replacing Loop 2 of α1GlyR subunits with Loop 2 from the δGABA_AR (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit, reduced ethanol threshold and increased the degree of ethanol potentiation without altering general receptor function. Similarly, replacing Loop 2 of the γ subunit of GABA_ARs with δL2 shifted the ethanol threshold from 50 mm in WT to 1 mm in the GABA_A γ-δL2 mutant. These findings indicate that the structure of Loop 2 can profoundly affect ethanol sensitivity in GlyRs and GABA_ARs. The δL2 mutations did not affect GlyR or GABA_AR sensitivity, respectively, to Zn²⁺ or diazepam, which suggests that these δL2-induced changes in ethanol sensitivity do not extend to all allosteric modulators and may be specific for ethanol or ethanol-like agents. To explore molecular mechanisms underlying these results, we threaded the WT and δL2 GlyR sequences onto the x-ray structure of the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric ligand-gated ion channel homologue (GLIC). In addition to being the first GlyR model threaded on GLIC, the juxtaposition of the two structures led to a possible mechanistic explanation for the effects of ethanol on GlyR-based on changes in Loop 2 structure.Alcohol abuse and dependence are significant problems in our society, with ∼14 million people in the United States being affected (1, 2). Alcohol causes over 100,000 deaths in the United States, and alcohol-related issues are estimated to cost nearly 200 billion dollars annually (2). To address this, considerable attention has focused on the development of medications to prevent and treat alcohol-related problems (3–5). The development of such medications would be aided by a clear understanding of the molecular structures on which ethanol acts and how these structures influence receptor sensitivity to ethanol.Ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs)² have received substantial attention as putative sites of ethanol action that cause its behavioral effects (6–12). Research in this area has focused on investigating the effects of ethanol on two large superfamilies of LGICs: 1) the Cys-loop superfamily of LGICs (13, 14), whose members include nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-hydroxytryptamine₃, γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A), γ-aminobutyric acid type C, and glycine receptors (GlyRs) (10, 11, 15–20) and 2) the glutamate superfamily, including N-methyl d-aspartate, α-amino-3-hydroxyisoxazolepropionic acid, and kainate receptors (21, 22). Recent studies have also begun investigating ethanol action in the ATP-gated P2X superfamily of LGICs (23–25).A series of studies that employed chimeric and mutagenic strategies combined with sulfhydryl-specific labeling identified key regions within Cys-loop receptors that appear to be initial targets for ethanol action that also can determine the sensitivity of the receptors to ethanol (7–12, 18, 19, 26–30). This work provides several lines of evidence that position 267 and possibly other sites in the transmembrane (TM) domain of GlyRs and homologous sites in GABA_ARs are targets for ethanol action and that mutations at these sites can influence ethanol sensitivity (8, 9, 26, 31).Growing evidence from GlyRs indicates that ethanol also acts on the extracellular domain. The initial findings came from studies demonstrating that α1GlyRs are more sensitive to ethanol than are α2GlyRs despite the high (∼78%) sequence homology between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (32). Further work found that an alanine to serine exchange at position 52 (A52S) in Loop 2 can eliminate the difference in ethanol sensitivity between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (18, 20, 33). These studies also demonstrated that mutations at position 52 in α1GlyRS and the homologous position 59 in α2GlyRs controlled the sensitivity of these receptors to a novel mechanistic ethanol antagonist (20). Collectively, these studies suggest that there are multiple sites of ethanol action in α1GlyRs, with one site located in the TM domain (e.g. position 267) and another in the extracellular domain (e.g. position 52).Subsequent studies revealed that the polarity of the residue at position 52 plays a key role in determining the sensitivity of GlyRs to ethanol (20). The findings with polarity in the extracellular domain contrast with the findings at position 267 in the TM domain, where molecular volume, but not polarity, significantly affected ethanol sensitivity (9). Taken together, these findings indicate that the physical-chemical parameters of residues at positions in the extracellular and TM domains that modulate ethanol effects and/or initiate ethanol action in GlyRs are not uniform. Thus, knowledge regarding the physical-chemical properties that control agonist and ethanol sensitivity is key for understanding the relationship between the structure and the actions of ethanol in LGICs (19, 31, 34–40).GlyRs and GABA_ARs, which differ significantly in their sensitivities to ethanol, offer a potential method for identifying the structures that control ethanol sensitivity. For example, α1GlyRs do not reliably respond to ethanol concentrations less than 10 mm (32, 33, 41). Similarly, γ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α1β2γ2), the most predominantly expressed GABA_ARs in the central nervous system, are insensitive to ethanol concentrations less than 50 mm (42, 43). In contrast, δ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α4β3δ) have been shown to be sensitive to ethanol concentrations as low as 1–3 mm (44–51). Sequence alignment of α1GlyR, γGABA_AR, and δGABA_AR revealed differences between the Loop 2 regions of these receptor subunits. Since prior studies found that mutations of Loop 2 residues can affect ethanol sensitivity (19, 20, 39), the non-conserved residues in Loop 2 of GlyR and GABA_AR subunits could provide the physical-chemical and structural bases underlying the differences in ethanol sensitivity between these receptors.The present study tested the hypothesis that the structure of Loop 2 can markedly affect the ethanol sensitivity of GlyRs and GABA_ARs. To accomplish this, we performed multiple mutations that replaced the Loop 2 region of the α1 subunit in α1GlyRs and the Loop 2 region of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with corresponding non-conserved residues from the δ subunit of GABA_AR and tested the sensitivity of these receptors to ethanol. As predicted, replacing Loop 2 of WT α1GlyRs with the homologous residues from the δGABA_AR subunit (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit (γL2), markedly increased the sensitivity of the receptor to ethanol. Similarly, replacing the non-conserved residues of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with δL2 also markedly increased ethanol sensitivity of GABA_ARs. These findings support the hypothesis and suggest that Loop 2 may play a role in controlling ethanol sensitivity across the Cys-loop superfamily of receptors. The findings also provide the basis for suggesting structure-function relationships in a new molecular model of the GlyR based on the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric LGIC homologue (GLIC).     

Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 2 Engages CCR2+ Stromal Cells of Monocytic Origin to Promote Breast Cancer Metastasis to Lung and Bone

Metastatic spread of cancer to distant vital organs, including lung and bone, is the overwhelming cause of breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Effective treatment of systemic metastasis relies on the identification and functional characterization of metastasis mediators to multiple organs. Overexpression of the chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) is frequently associated with advanced tumor stage and metastatic relapse in breast cancer. However, the functional mechanism of CCL2 in promoting organ-specific metastasis of breast cancer has not been rigorously investigated. Here, we used organ-specific metastatic sublines of the MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cell line to demonstrate that overexpression of CCL2 promotes breast cancer metastasis to both lung and bone. Conversely, blocking CCL2 function with a neutralizing antibody reduced lung and bone metastases. The enhancement of lung and bone metastases by CCL2 was associated with increased macrophage infiltration and osteoclast differentiation, respectively. By performing functional assays with primary cells isolated from the wild type, CCL2 and CCR2 knock-out mice, we showed that tumor cell-derived CCL2 depends on its receptor CCR2 (chemokine, CC motif, receptor 2) expressed on stromal cells to exert its function in promoting macrophage recruitment and osteoclast differentiation. Overall, these data demonstrated that CCL2-expressing breast tumor cells engage CCR2⁺ stromal cells of monocytic origin, including macrophages and preosteoclasts, to facilitate colonization in lung and bone. Therefore, CCL2 and CCR2 are promising therapeutic targets for simultaneously inhibiting lung and bone metastasis of breast cancer.Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in the United States, with an estimated 182,000 new cases and 40,000 deaths in 2008 (1). Late stage breast cancer patients develop metastases in bone, lung, liver, brain, and other organs, which are responsible for most breast cancer-related mortality and morbidity (2). Severe complications from bone metastasis include debilitating bone fractures, nerve compression and bone pain, and hypercalcemia (3–5), whereas lung metastasis is accompanied by cough, bloody sputum, rib cage pain, and, eventually, failure of the respiratory functions (6). Colonization of different secondary organs by breast cancer is believed to be a complex, multigenic process that depends on productive interactions between tumor cells and stromal microenvironments through concerted actions of organ-specific metastasis genes (7, 8). Functional genomic analysis of preclinical models of breast cancer to bone, lung, and brain have identified distinct sets of organ-specific metastasis genes (9–11), providing novel mechanistic insights into key rate-limiting steps of metastasis to different organs. However, as advanced breast cancer patients often suffer from metastases at several secondary organs, identifying genes that are capable of instigating metastasis to multiple sites may provide the ideal targets for therapeutic intervention of systemic metastasis.Chemokines are small (8–14 kDa) proteins classified into four conserved groups (CXC, CC, C, and CX3C) based on the position of the first two cysteines that are adjacent to the amino terminus (12). They are chemotactic cytokines that stimulate directed migration of leukocytes in response to inflammatory signals. Chemokines are also involved in the maintenance of hematopoietic homeostasis, regulation of cell proliferation, tissue morphogenesis, and angiogenesis (13). Chemokines bind to the seven-transmembrane domain receptors to elicit downstream molecular events that coordinate cell movement. Even though chemokines are unlikely to be a contributing factor for tumor initiation, they can have pleiotropic effects on tumor progression (13, 14). Among more than 50 human chemokines, CCL2 is of particular importance. CCL2, also called monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), is a potent chemoattractant for monocytes, memory T lymphocytes, and natural killer cells (15). It is involved in a number of inflammatory conditions associated with monocyte recruitment, including delayed hypersensitivity reactions, bacterial infection, arthritis, and renal disease (15). The importance of CCL2 in cancer was manifested by its overexpression in a variety of tumor types, including glioma, ovarian, esophagus, lung, breast, and prostate cancers (15–17). In prostate cancer, CCL2 expression levels was associated with advanced pathological stage (16). Importantly, CCL2-neutralizing antibodies inhibit bone resorption in vitro and bone metastasis in vivo (18–20). In lung cancer, serum CCL2 levels were elevated in lung cancer patients with bone metastasis compared with localized diseases. Neutralizing antibodies against CCL2 also inhibited the tumor conditioned media-induced osteoclast formation in vitro and bone metastasis in vivo (17). Taken together, these findings suggested a role of CCL2 in bone metastasis.A potential role of CCL2 in breast cancer progression and metastasis has been indicated by the analysis of CCL2 expression of tumor and serum samples from breast cancer patients. Serum CCL2 levels were significantly higher in postmenopausal breast cancer patients than in age-matched controls (21). Over 50% of breast cancer tumor samples had intense staining of CCL2 in tumor cells (22). Prognostic analysis further revealed that high expression of CCL2 was correlated with advanced tumor stage, lymph node metastasis (23), and early relapse (24). CCL2 up-regulation in breast tumors was also associated with the infiltration of tissue-associated macrophages (TAMs)³ and with increased microvessel density (22, 24). TAMs have been known to contribute to primary tumor progression and metastasis of breast cancer (25), which is supported by epidemiological evidence showing that TAM infiltration portended a poor clinical outcome (26, 27). However, whether the function of CCL2 in modulating activity of macrophages and possibly other cell types is important for breast tumor organotropic metastasis has not been rigorously investigated. CCL2 may engage organ-specific cell types derived from the same bone marrow myelomonocytic progenitors. These progenitors differentiate into osteoclast precursors in bone or into blood monocytes that eventually become mature macrophages in different tissues, like alveolar macrophages in lung (28). These stromal cell types of myelomonocytic origin may contribute to different functions in different organ-specific metastases. Another unresolved question regarding the function of CCL2 in tumor-stroma interaction is the functional involvement of CCL2 receptors. CCL2 can bind to both CCR2 and CCR4 (29, 30). Loss of function studies in mice showed CCL2 and CCR2 knock-out mice displayed similar impairments in monocyte migration (31, 32), suggesting that CCR2 is the major functional receptor for CCL2. Understanding whether CCR2 deficiency in stromal cells leads to compromised monocyte engagement by CCL2-expressing tumor cells may have important implications in designing targeting therapeutics against the CCL2/CCR2 axis.In this study, we used the recently developed organ-specific metastatic sublines of the human breast cancer cell MDA-MB-231 (9, 10, 33) and showed that overexpression of CCL2 promotes both lung and bone metastases. This function was associated with increased TAM infiltration in lung metastasis and increased osteoclast differentiation in bone metastasis, respectively. Furthermore, by using macrophages and bone marrow cells isolated from wild type, CCL2-deficient, and CCR2-deficient mice, we showed that CCR2 expression in stromal cells is essential for tumor-derived CCL2 to recruit macrophages and promote osteoclastogenesis. Targeting tumor-derived CCL2 by a neutralizing antibody significantly reduced metastasis formation in both bone and lung.     

Structure of the c14 Rotor Ring of the Proton Translocating Chloroplast ATP Synthase

The structure of the membrane integral rotor ring of the proton translocating F₁F₀ ATP synthase from spinach chloroplasts was determined to 3.8 Å resolution by x-ray crystallography. The rotor ring consists of 14 identical protomers that are symmetrically arranged around a central pore. Comparisons with the c₁₁ rotor ring of the sodium translocating ATPase from Ilyobacter tartaricus show that the conserved carboxylates involved in proton or sodium transport, respectively, are 10.6–10.8 Å apart in both c ring rotors. This finding suggests that both ATPases have the same gear distance despite their different stoichiometries. The putative proton-binding site at the conserved carboxylate Glu⁶¹ in the chloroplast ATP synthase differs from the sodium-binding site in Ilyobacter. Residues adjacent to the conserved carboxylate show increased hydrophobicity and reduced hydrogen bonding. The crystal structure reflects the protonated form of the chloroplast c ring rotor. We propose that upon deprotonation, the conformation of Glu⁶¹ is changed to another rotamer and becomes fully exposed to the periphery of the ring. Reprotonation of Glu⁶¹ by a conserved arginine in the adjacent a subunit returns the carboxylate to its initial conformation.ATP synthases found in the energy-transducing membranes of bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts catalyze ATP synthesis and ATP hydrolysis coupled with transmembrane proton or sodium ion transport. The enzymes are multi-subunit complexes composed of an extra-membranous catalytic F₁ domain and an interconnected integral membrane F₀ domain. The hydrophilic F₁ domain consists of five different polypeptides with a stoichiometry of α₃β₃γδϵ. Detailed structural information obtained with the mitochondrial enzyme (1–3) in combination with biochemical (4), biophysical (5), and single molecule studies (6–9) revealed that synthesis or hydrolysis of ATP in the F₁ domain is accomplished via a rotary catalytic mechanism. In addition to information on the catalytic mechanism, structure analysis and single molecule studies of the mitochondrial or the chloroplast F₁ complex have also unraveled the molecular mechanism of several F₁-specific inhibitors (10–14). Less detailed information is available on the integral membrane F₀ domain, which consists of three different polypeptides (a, b, and c) and mediates the transfer of protons or sodium ions across the membrane. Subunits a and b were shown to reside at the periphery of a cylindrical complex formed by multiple copies of the c subunit (15–18). The number of c subunits in the cylindrical subcomplex shows substantial variation in different organisms. Ten protomers are found in ATP synthases from yeast, Escherichia coli and Bacillus PS3 (19–21), 11 in Ilyobacter tartaricus, Propionigenium modestum, and Clostridium paradoxum (22–24), 13 in the thermoalkalophilic Bacillus TA2.TA1 (25), 14 in spinach chloroplasts (26), and 15 in the cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis (27). The structure of isolated subunits a, b, and c from E. coli has been studied by mutagenesis analysis and by NMR spectroscopy in a mixed solvent that was suggested to mimic the membrane environment (28–32). These studies showed that subunit a folds with five membrane-spanning helices. The fourth of these helices directly interacts with subunit c and contains a conserved arginine (Arg²¹⁰), which is thought to be involved in proton transfer (33). Subunit b, which is present in two copies in the intact F₀, contains a single transmembrane helix. Cross-linking data support a direct interaction of the two copies of the b subunit (29). Subunit c was studied at two different pH values to obtain the protonated and deprotonated form of a conserved carboxylate (Asp⁶¹ in E. coli) that was shown to be essential for proton transport (34). NMR spectroscopy revealed that the isolated c subunit consists of two long hydrophobic membrane spanning segments connected by a short hydrophilic loop (30, 35). This loop is located close to the γ and ϵ subunit on the F₁ side of the membrane (36, 37). Low resolution x-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy showed that the membrane-spanning helices of the multiple copies of subunit c in the intact F₀ complex are tightly packed in two concentric rings (19, 22, 26). Atomic resolution of the c ring was recently provided for the Na⁺-translocating F-type ATPase from I. tartaricus (38) and the related Na⁺-translocating V-type ATPase from Enterococcus hirae (39). Rotation of the c ring was demonstrated by cross-linking (18), fluorescence studies (40), and single molecule visualization (41, 42). Based on the structural and biochemical information on F₁ and F₀, different mechanical models have been proposed describing how the rotation of the c ring is coupled to the rotation of the F₁ rotor subunits. This rotation in turn drives sequential conformational shifts at the three catalytic β subunits that result in ATP synthesis (43–45). Vice versa hydrolysis of ATP in the F₁ domain is thought to drive rotation of the γϵc_10–15 subcomplex and transports protons or sodium ions across the membrane.Here we describe the crystal structure of the chloroplast c₁₄ rotor, which is the first structure of an isolated c ring rotor from a proton driven ATPase. The structure was solved by molecular replacement using a tetradecameric search model that was generated from a monomer taken from the I. tartaricus c₁₁ structure. The imposition of noncrystallographic symmetry restraints during refinement substantially improved electron density and structure determination.