Assembly of the RAG1/RAG2 Synaptic Complex

Assembly of antigen receptor genes by V(D)J recombination requires the site-specific recognition of two distinct DNA elements differing in the length of the spacer DNA that separates two conserved recognition motifs. Under appropriate conditions, V(D)J cleavage by the purified RAG1/RAG2 recombinase is similarly restricted. Double-strand breakage occurs only when these proteins are bound to a pair of complementary signals in a synaptic complex. We examine here the binding of the RAG proteins to signal sequences and find that the full complement of proteins required for synapsis of two signals and coupled cleavage can assemble on a single signal. This complex, composed of a dimer of RAG2 and at least a trimer of RAG1, remains inactive for double-strand break formation until a second complementary signal is provided. Thus, binding of the second signal activates the complex, possibly by inducing a conformational change. If synaptic complexes are formed similarly in vivo, one signal of a recombining pair may be the preferred site for RAG1/RAG2 assembly.     

Characterization of the Molecular Mechanism Underlying Gibberellin Perception Complex Formation in Rice

The DELLA protein SLENDER RICE1 (SLR1) is a repressor of gibberellin (GA) signaling in rice (Oryza sativa), and most of the GA-associated responses are induced upon SLR1 degradation. It is assumed that interaction between GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF1 (GID1) and the N-terminal DELLA/TVHYNP motif of SLR1 triggers F-box protein GID2-mediated SLR1 degradation. We identified a semidominant dwarf mutant, Slr1-d4, which contains a mutation in the region encoding the C-terminal GRAS domain of SLR1 (SLR1^G576V). The GA-dependent degradation of SLR1^G576V was reduced in Slr1-d4, and compared with SLR1, SLR1^G576V showed reduced interaction with GID1 and almost none with GID2 when tested in yeast cells. Surface plasmon resonance of GID1-SLR1 and GID1-SLR1^G576V interactions revealed that the GRAS domain of SLR1 functions to stabilize the GID1-SLR1 interaction by reducing its dissociation rate and that the G576V substitution in SLR1 diminishes this stability. These results suggest that the stable interaction of GID1-SLR1 through the GRAS domain is essential for the recognition of SLR1 by GID2. We propose that when the DELLA/TVHYNP motif of SLR1 binds with GID1, it enables the GRAS domain of SLR1 to interact with GID1 and that the stable GID1-SLR1 complex is efficiently recognized by GID2.     

Regulation of RAG1/RAG2-mediated transposition by GTP and the C-terminal region of RAG2

The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins perform critical DNA recognition and cleavage functions in V(D)J recombination, and also catalyze efficient DNA transposition in vitro. No transposition in vivo by the RAG proteins has been reported, suggesting regulation of the reaction by as yet unknown mechanisms. Here we report that RAG-mediated transposition is suppressed by physiological concentrations of the guanine nucleotide GTP, and by the full-length RAG2 protein. Both GTP and full-length RAG2 inhibit transposition by blocking the non-covalent 'capture' of target DNA, and both are capable of inhibiting RAG-mediated hybrid joint formation in vitro. We also observe that another intracellular signaling molecule, Ca(2+), stimulates RAG-mediated transposition and is capable of activating transposition even in reactions containing full-length RAG2 and GTP. RAG-mediated transposition has been proposed to contribute to the chromosomal translocations that underlie the development of lymphoid malignancies, and our findings highlight regulatory mechanisms that might prevent such occurrences, and circumstances in which these regulatory mechanisms could be overcome.     

Terminal Axonal Arborization and Synaptic Bouton Formation Critically Rely on Abp1 and the Arp2/3 Complex

Neuronal network formation depends on properly timed and localized generation of presynaptic as well as postsynaptic structures. Although of utmost importance for understanding development and plasticity of the nervous system and neurodegenerative diseases, the molecular mechanisms that ensure the fine-control needed for coordinated establishment of pre- and postsynapses are still largely unknown. We show that the F-actin-binding protein Abp1 is prominently expressed in the Drosophila nervous system and reveal that Abp1 is an important regulator in shaping glutamatergic neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) of flies. STED microscopy shows that Abp1 accumulations can be found in close proximity of synaptic vesicles and at the cell cortex in nerve terminals. Abp1 knock-out larvae have locomotion defects and underdeveloped NMJs that are characterized by a reduced number of both type Ib synaptic boutons and branches of motornerve terminals. Abp1 is able to indirectly trigger Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin nucleation and interacts with both WASP and Scar. Consistently, Arp2 and Arp3 loss-of-function also resulted in impairments of bouton formation and arborization at NMJs, i.e. fully phenocopied abp1 knock-out. Interestingly, neuron- and muscle-specific rescue experiments revealed that synaptic bouton formation critically depends on presynaptic Abp1, whereas the NMJ branching defects can be compensated for by restoring Abp1 functions at either side. In line with this presynaptic importance of Abp1, also presynaptic Arp2 and Arp3 are crucial for the formation of type Ib synaptic boutons. Interestingly, presynaptic Abp1 functions in NMJ formation were fully dependent on the Arp2/3 complex, as revealed by suppression of Abp1-induced synaptic bouton formation and branching of axon terminals upon presynaptic Arp2 RNAi. These data reveal that Abp1 and Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin cytoskeletal dynamics drive both synaptic bouton formation and NMJ branching. Our data furthermore shed light on an intense bidirectional functional crosstalk between pre- and postsynapses during the development of synaptic contacts.     

The Molecular Mechanism Underlying Mechanical Anisotropy of the Protein GB1

Mechanical responses of elastic proteins are crucial for their biological function and nanotechnological use. Loading direction has been identified as one key determinant for the mechanical responses of proteins. However, it is not clear how a change in pulling direction changes the mechanical unfolding mechanism of the protein. Here, we combine protein engineering, single-molecule force spectroscopy, and steered molecular dynamics simulations to systematically investigate the mechanical response of a small globular protein GB1. Force versus extension profiles from both experiments and simulations reveal marked mechanical anisotropy of GB1. Using native contact analysis, we relate the mechanically robust shearing geometry with concurrent rupture of native contacts. This clearly contrasts the sequential rupture observed in simulations for the mechanically labile peeling geometry. Moreover, we identify multiple distinct mechanical unfolding pathways in two loading directions. Implications of such diverse unfolding mechanisms are discussed. Our results may also provide some insights for designing elastomeric proteins with tailored mechanical properties.     

A RAG1 and RAG2 Tetramer Complex Is Active in Cleavage in V(D)J Recombination

During V(D)J recombination two proteins, RAG1 and RAG2, assemble as a protein-DNA complex with the appropriate DNA targets containing recombination signal sequences (RSSs). The properties of this complex require a fairly elaborate set of protein-protein and protein-DNA contacts. Here we show that a purified derivative of RAG1, without DNA, exists predominantly as a homodimer. A RAG2 derivative alone has monomer, dimer, and larger forms. The coexpressed RAG1 and RAG2 proteins form a mixed tetramer in solution which contains two molecules of each protein. The same tetramer of RAG1 and RAG2 plus one DNA molecule is the form active in cleavage. Additionally, we show that both DNA products following cleavage can still be held together in a stable protein-DNA complex.     

DNA mismatches and GC-rich motifs target transposition by the RAG1/RAG2 transposase

In addition to their essential role in V(D)J recombination, the RAG proteins function as a transposase capable of inserting the V(D)J recombination intermediate, the signal end DNA fragment, into target DNA. RAG-mediated transposition has been suggested to contribute to genome instability and the development of lymphoid malignancies. Previous studies suggested that the RAG transposase exhibits a target site preference for GC rich sequences and hairpin structures. Here we demonstrate that a transposition hot spot (5′-GCCGCCGGGCC-3′), smaller portions of this hot spot and other GC rich motifs are able to target RAG-mediated transposition. Tracks of GC base pairs have been shown to have an unusually high rate of base pair breathing. Intriguingly, we find that DNA mismatches can efficiently target RAG-mediated transposition and suppress the use of other target sites. Hairpins, however, are not generally preferred targets. Our results indicate that target DNA melting may be a crucial step during RAG-mediated transposition, and that target site selection by the RAG transposase may be intimately linked to mutagenic and metabolic processes that transiently present favorable DNA structures to the transposition machinery.     

Identification of two catalytic residues in RAG1 that define a single active site within the RAG1/RAG2 protein complex

During V(D)J recombination, the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins cooperate to catalyze a series of DNA bond breakage and strand transfer reactions. The structure, location, and number of active sites involved in RAG-mediated catalysis have as yet not been determined. Using protein secondary structure prediction algorithms, we have identified a region of RAG1 with possible structural similarities to the active site regions of transposases and retroviral integrases. Based on this information, we have identified two aspartic acid residues in RAG1 (D600 and D708) that function specifically in catalysis. The results support a model in which RAG1 contains a single, divalent metal ion binding active site structurally related to the active sites of transposases/integrases and responsible for all catalytic functions of the RAG protein complex.     

HMGB1/2 can target DNA for illegitimate cleavage by the RAG1/2 complex

Background  

V(D)J recombination is initiated in antigen receptor loci by the pairwise cleavage of recombination signal sequences (RSSs) by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins via a nick-hairpin mechanism. The RSS contains highly conserved heptamer (consensus: 5'-CACAGTG) and nonamer (consensus: 5'-ACAAAAACC) motifs separated by either 12- or 23-base pairs of poorly conserved sequence. The high mobility group proteins HMGB1 and HMGB2 (HMGB1/2) are highly abundant architectural DNA binding proteins known to promote RAG-mediated synapsis and cleavage of consensus recombination signals in vitro by facilitating RSS binding and bending by the RAG1/2 complex. HMGB1/2 are known to recognize distorted DNA structures such as four-way junctions, and damaged or modified DNA. Whether HMGB1/2 can promote RAG-mediated DNA cleavage at sites lacking a canonical RSS by targeting or stabilizing structural distortions is unclear, but is important for understanding the etiology of chromosomal translocations involving antigen receptor genes and proto-oncogene sequences that do not contain an obvious RSS-like element.     

Epstein-Barr virus induction of recombinase-activating genes RAG1 and RAG2.

In experimental B-cell infections, Epstein-Barr virus induced sustained expression of V(D)J recombinase-activating genes RAG1 and RAG2, whose aberrant activity has been implicated in chromosomal translocations in B-cell neoplasms. In cell lines in which RAG1 and RAG2 were detected, virus integrated into cellular DNA rather than assumed the configuration of extrachromosomal episomes. Expression of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 in transient transfection assays was sufficient to induce both recombinase-activating genes.     

DNA Hairpin Opening Mediated by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins

The lymphoid cell-specific proteins RAG1 and RAG2 initiate V(D)J recombination by cleaving DNA adjacent to recombination signals, generating blunt signal ends and covalently sealed, hairpin coding ends. A critical next step in the reaction is opening of the hairpins, but the factor(s) responsible has not been identified and had been thought to be a ubiquitous component(s) of the DNA repair machinery. Here we demonstrate that RAG1 and RAG2 possess an intrinsic single-stranded nuclease activity capable of nicking hairpin coding ends at or near the hairpin tip. In Mn2+, a synthetic hairpin is nicked 5 nucleotides (nt) 5' of the hairpin tip, with more distant sites of nicking suppressed by HMG2. In Mg2+, hairpins generated by V(D)J cleavage are nicked whereas synthetic hairpins are not. Cleavage-generated hairpins are nicked at the tip and predominantly 1 to 2 nt 5' of the tip. RAG1 and RAG2 may therefore be responsible for initiating the processing of coding ends and for the generation of P nucleotides during V(D)J recombination.     

A Non-Sequence-Specific DNA Binding Mode of RAG1 Is Inhibited by RAG2

RAG1 and RAG2 proteins catalyze site-specific DNA cleavage reactions in V(D)J recombination, a process that assembles antigen receptor genes from component gene segments during lymphocyte development. The first step towards the DNA cleavage reaction is the sequence-specific association of the RAG proteins with the conserved recombination signal sequence (RSS), which flanks each gene segment in the antigen receptor loci. Questions remain as to the contribution of each RAG protein to recognition of the RSS. For example, while RAG1 alone is capable of recognizing the conserved elements of the RSS, it is not clear if or how RAG2 may enhance sequence-specific associations with the RSS. To shed light on this issue, we examined the association of RAG1, with and without RAG2, with consensus RSS versus non-RSS substrates using fluorescence anisotropy and gel mobility shift assays. The results indicate that while RAG1 can recognize the RSS, the sequence-specific interaction under physiological conditions is masked by a high-affinity non-sequence-specific DNA binding mode. Significantly, addition of RAG2 effectively suppressed the association of RAG1 with non-sequence-specific DNA, resulting in a large differential in binding affinity for the RSS versus the non-RSS sites. We conclude that this represents a major means by which RAG2 contributes to the initial recognition of the RSS and that, therefore, association of RAG1 with RAG2 is required for effective interactions with the RSS in developing lymphocytes.     

Structural Mechanism Underlying the Specific Recognition between the Arabidopsis State-Transition Phosphatase TAP38/PPH1 and Phosphorylated Light-Harvesting Complex Protein Lhcb1

During state transitions, plants regulate energy distribution between photosystems I and II through reversible phosphorylation and lateral migration of the major light-harvesting complex LHCII. Dephosphorylation of LHCII and the transition from state 2 to state 1 requires a thylakoid membrane-associated phosphatase named TAP38 or PPH1. TAP38/PPH1 specifically targets LHCII but not the core subunits of photosystem II, whereas the underlying molecular mechanism of their mutual recognition is currently unclear. Here, we present the structures of Arabidopsis thaliana TAP38/PPH1 in the substrate-free and substrate-bound states. The protein contains a type 2C serine/threonine protein phosphatase (PP2C) core domain, a Mn²⁺ (or Mg²⁺) binuclear center and two additional motifs contributing to substrate recognition. A 15-mer phosphorylated N-terminal peptide of Lhcb1 binds to TAP38/PPH1 on two surface clefts enclosed by the additional motifs. The first segment of the phosphopeptide is clamped by a pair of tooth-like arginine residues at Cleft 1 site. The binding adopts the lock-and-key mechanism with slight rearrangement of the substrate binding residues on TAP38/PPH1. Meanwhile, a more evident substrate-induced fitting occurs on Cleft 2 harboring the extended part of the phosphopeptide. The results unravel the bases for the specific recognition between TAP38/PPH1 and phosphorylated Lhcb1, a crucial step in state transitions.     

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA-Polycation Complex Formation

Complexes formed from DNA and polycations are of interest because of their potential use in gene therapy; however, there remains a lack of understanding of the structure and formation of DNA-polycation complexes at atomic scale. In this work, molecular dynamics simulations of the DNA duplex d(CGCGAATTCGCG) in the presence of polycation chains are carried out to shed light on the specific atomic interaction that result in complex formation. The structures of complexes formed from DNA with polyethylenimine, which is considered one of the most promising DNA vector candidates, and a second polycation, poly-L-lysine, are compared. After an initial separation of ∼50 Å, the DNA and polycation come together and form a stable complex within 10 ns. The DNA does not undergo any major structural changes on complexation and remains in the B-form. In the formed complex, the charged amine groups of the polycation mainly interact with DNA phosphate groups, with polycation intrusion into the major and minor grooves dependent on the identity and charge state of the polycation. The ability of the polycation to effectively neutralize the charge of the DNA phosphate groups and the resulting influence on the DNA helix interaction are discussed.     

The Benzodiazepine/GABA Receptor Complex: Molecular Size in Brain Synaptic Membranes and in Solution

Abstract: The molecular size of the benzodiazepine (BZ) receptor in the synaptic membrane of brain cortex (bovine or rat) was determined by an improved version of the radiation inactivation method to be 220,000. An identical size was found simultaneously for the associated γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor and for the component binding β-carboline esters. It is proposed that all three activities reside in a single protein or protein complex in the membrane. The size in solution, after extraction into Triton X-100 medium from exhaustively washed membranes, was estimated by sedimentation constant (9.4S) and by gel filtration (∼230,000 apparent MW), again with the BZ and GABA binding activities behaving identically. This size applies to the component that undergoes photoaffinity labelling by [³H]flunitrazepam in the membrane, and contains a 51,000 M_r polypeptide as the BZ-binding subunit. It is concluded that a protein complex or oligomer of 200,000–220,000 MW carries a class of BZ-binding sites and an associated class of GABA_A sites.     

Microtubule Simulations Provide Insight into the Molecular Mechanism Underlying Dynamic Instability

The dynamic instability of microtubules (MTs), which refers to their ability to switch between polymerization and depolymerization states, is crucial for their function. It has been proposed that the growing MT ends are protected by a “GTP cap” that consists of GTP-bound tubulin dimers. When the speed of GTP hydrolysis is faster than dimer recruitment, the loss of this GTP cap will lead the MT to undergo rapid disassembly. However, the underlying atomistic mechanistic details of the dynamic instability remains unclear. In this study, we have performed long-time atomistic molecular dynamics simulations (1 μs for each system) for MT patches as well as a short segment of a closed MT in both GTP- and GDP-bound states. Our results confirmed that MTs in the GDP state generally have weaker lateral interactions between neighboring protofilaments (PFs) and less cooperative outward bending conformational change, where the difference between bending angles of neighboring PFs tends to be larger compared with GTP ones. As a result, when the GDP state tubulin dimer is exposed at the growing MT end, these factors will be more likely to cause the MT to undergo rapid disassembly. We also compared simulation results between the special MT seam region and the remaining material and found that the lateral interactions between MT PFs at the seam region were comparatively much weaker. This finding is consistent with the experimental suggestion that the seam region tends to separate during the disassembly process of an MT.     

Identification of basic residues in RAG2 critical for DNA binding by the RAG1-RAG2 complex.

In V(D)J recombination, the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins are the essential components of the complex that catalyzes DNA cleavage. RAG1 has been shown to play a central role in DNA binding and catalysis. In contrast, the molecular roles of RAG2 in V(D)J recombination are unknown. To address this, we individually mutated 36 evolutionarily conserved basic and hydroxy group containing residues within RAG2. Biochemical analysis of the recombinant RAG2 proteins led to the identification of a number of basic residue mutants defective in catalysis in vitro and V(D)J recombination in vivo. Five of these were deficient in binding of the RAG1-RAG2 complex to its cognate DNA target sequence while interacting normally with RAG1. Our findings provide support for the direct involvement of RAG2 in DNA binding during all steps of the cleavage reaction.     

RAG1 and RAG2 cooperate in specific binding to the recombination signal sequence in vitro

An essential step in the development of the vertebrate immune system is the DNA level rearrangement of the antigen receptor genes. This process, termed "V(D)J recombination," begins with DNA cleavage at the appropriate sites mediated by the two proteins RAG1 and RAG2. We report here that the two proteins cooperate to bind DNA with significantly higher specificity than either protein alone. Gel purification of the triple complex is performed in the absence of any cross-linking agents. Both proteins remain present in the complex, and UV cross-linking using iodouridine-containing probes shows that RAG1 makes close contacts in both the heptamer and nonamer motifs. The two proteins are also shown to associate with each other in the absence of any DNA. These findings refine our understanding of the protein-DNA interactions that accompany cleavage at the recombination signals.     

Joining mutants of RAG1 and RAG2 that demonstrate impaired interactions with the coding-end DNA

In V(D)J joining of antigen receptor genes, two recombination signal sequences (RSSs), 12- and 23-RSSs, form a complex with the protein products of recombination activating genes, RAG1 and RAG2. DNaseI footprinting demonstrates that the interaction of RAG proteins with substrate RSS DNA is not just limited to the signal region but involves the coding sequence as well. Joining mutants of RAG1 and RAG2 demonstrate impaired interactions with the coding region in both pre- and postcleavage type complexes. A possible role of this RAG coding region interaction is discussed in the context of V(D)J recombination.     

RAG1 and RAG2 expression by B cell subsets from human tonsil and peripheral blood

It has been suggested that B cells acquire the capacity for secondary V(D)J recombination during germinal center (GC) reactions. The nature of these B cells remains controversial. Subsets of tonsil and blood B cells and also individual B cells were examined for the expression of recombination-activating gene (RAG) mRNA. Semiquantitative analysis indicated that RAG1 mRNA was present in all tonsil B cell subsets, with the largest amount found in naive B cells. RAG2 mRNA was only found in tonsil naive B cells, centrocytes, and to a lesser extent in centroblasts. Neither RAG1 nor RAG2 mRNA was routinely found in normal peripheral blood B cells. In individual tonsil B cells, RAG1 and RAG2 mRNAs were found in 18% of naive B cells, 22% of GC founder cells, 0% of centroblasts, 13% of centrocytes, and 9% of memory B cells. Individual naive tonsil B cells containing both RAG1 and RAG2 mRNA were activated (CD69(+)). In normal peripheral blood approximately 5% of B cells expressed both RAG1 and RAG2. These cells were uniformly postswitch memory B cells as documented by the coexpression of IgG mRNA. These results indicate that coordinate RAG expression is not found in normal peripheral naive B cells but is up-regulated in naive B cells which are activated in the tonsil. With the exception of centroblasts, RAG1 and RAG2 expression can be found in all components of the GC, including postswitch memory B cells, some of which may circulate in the blood of normal subjects.