Chlorophyll fluorescence quenching in the alga Euglena gracilis

When far red light preincubated cells of Euglena gracilis are transferred to dark or light, chlorophyll fluorescence (F₀ and F_m) decreases. Non-photochemical quenching in the dark is suggested to be induced partly by chlororespiration and partly by changes in the distribution of excitation energy between the photosystems. Depending on the light intensities it was possible to resolve the non-photochemical quenching into at least three different components. The slowest relaxation phase of non-photochemical quenching occurred only after exposure to high light and was assigned to photoinhibition. The other two components were an energy-dependent quenching (qE), and the one which we attribute to a spill over mechanism. We suggest that both photosystems use a common antenna system consisting of LHC I and LHC II proteins. In contrast to higher plants, qE in Euglena gracilis is independent of the xanthophyll cycle and an aggregation of LHC II. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Characterisation of the effects of Antimycin A upon high energy state quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence (qE) in spinach and pea chloroplasts

High energy state quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence (qE) is inhibited by low concentrations of the inhibitor antimycin A in intact and osmotically shocked chloroplasts isolated from spinach and pea plants. This inhibition is independent of any effect upon pH (as measured by 9-aminoacridine fluorescence quenching). A dual control of qE formation, by pH and the redox state of an unidentified chloroplast component, is implied. Results are discussed in terms of a role for qE in the dissipation of excess excitation energy within photosystem II.Abbreviations 9-AA_max = Maximum yield of 9-aminoacridine fluorescence - DCMU = 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea; F_max ± Maximum yield of chlorophyll fluorescence - hr = hour - PAR = Photosynthetically Active Radiation - Q_A = Primary stable electron acceptor within photosystem II - qE = High energy state quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence - qI = quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence related to photoinhibition - qP = Quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence by oxidised plastoquinone - qQ = photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence - qR = (F_max—maximum level of chlorophyll fluorescence induced by the addition of saturating DCMU) - qT = Quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence attributable to state transitions     

Spectroscopy of non-photochemical and photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves; evidence for a role of the light harvesting complex of Photosystem II in the regulation of energy dissipation

Dissipation of absorbed excitation energy as heat, measured by its effect on the quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence, is induced under conditions of excess light in order to protect the photosynthetic apparatus of plants from light-dependent damage. The spectral characteristics of this quenching have been compared to that due to photochemistry in the Photosystem II reaction centre using leaves of Guzmania monostachia. This was achieved by making measurements at 77K when fluorescence emission bands from each type of chlorophyll protein complex can be distinguished. It was demonstrated that photochemistry and non-photochemical dissipation preferentially quench different emission bands and therefore occur by dissimilar mechanisms at separate sites. It was found that photochemistry was associated with a preferential quenching of emission at 688 nm whereas the spectrum for rapidly reversible non-photochemical quenching had maxima at 683 nm and 698 nm, suggesting selective quenching of the bands originating from the light harvesting complexes of Photosystem II. Further evidence that this was occurring in the light harvesting system was obtained from the fluorescence excitation spectra recorded in the quenched and relaxed states.Abbreviations pH transthylakoid pH gradient - F_o minimum level of chlorophyll fluorescence when Photosystem II reaction centres are open - F_m maximum level of fluorescence when Photosystem II reaction centres are closed - F_v variable fluorescence F_m minus F_o - F'_o F_o in any quenched state - F_m F_m in any quenched state - LHCII light harvesting complexes of Photosystem II - PSI Photosystem I - PS II Photosystem II - qN non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence - qE non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence that occurs in the presence of a pH     

Xanthophyll cycle and energy-dependent fluorescence quenching in leaves from pea plants grown under intermittent light

The possible role of zeaxanthin formation and antenna proteins in energy-dependent chlorophyll fluorescence quenching (qE) has been investigated. Intermittent-light-grown pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants that lack most of the chlorophyll a/b antenna proteins exhibited a significantly reduced qE upon illumination with respect to control plants. On the other hand, the violaxanthin content related to the number of reaction centers and to xanthophyll cycle activity, i.e. the conversion of violaxanthin into zeaxanthin, was found to be increased in the antenna-protein-depleted plants. Western blot analyses indicated that, with the exception of CP 26, the content of all chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins in these plants is reduced to less than 10% of control values. The results indicate that chlorophyll a/b-binding antenna proteins are involved in the energy-dependent fluorescence quenching but that only a part of qE can be attributed to quenching by chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins. It seems very unlikely that xanthophylls are exclusively responsible for the qE mechanism.Abbreviations CAB chlorophyll a/b-binding - Chl chlorophyll - F_V variable fluorescence - IML intermittent light - LHC light harvesting complex - PFD photon flux density - qP photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluoresence - qN non-photochemical quenching - qE energy-dependent quenching - qI photoinhibitory quenching - qT quenching by state transition     

The efficiency of electron transfer from QA − to the donor side of Photosystem II decreases during induction of photosynthesis: Evidences from chlorophyll fluorescence and photoacoustic techniques

The amplitudes ratio of the fast and slow phases (A_fast/A_slow) in the kinetics of the dark relaxation of variable chlorophyll fluorescence (F_V) was studied after various periods of illumination of dark-adapted primary barley leaves. Simultaneously, photosynthetic activity was monitored using the photoacoustic technique and the photochemical and non-photochemical fluorescence quenching parameters. The ratio A_fast/A_slow changed with the preceding illumination time in a two-step manner. During the first stage of photosynthetic induction (0–20 s of illumination), characterized by a drop in O₂-dependent photoacoustic signal following an initial spike and by a relatively stable small value of photochemical F_V quenching, the ratio A_fast/A_slow remained practically unaltered. During the second stage (20–60 s of illumination), when both the rate of O₂ evolution and the photochemical F_V quenching were found to be sharply developed, a marked increase in the above ratio was also observed. A linear correlation was found between the value of the photochemical quenching and the ratio A_fast/A_slow during the second phase of photosynthetic induction. It is concluded that the slow phase appearing in the kinetics of F_V dark relaxation is not due to the existence of Photosystem II reaction centres lacking the ability to reduce P700⁺ with high rates, but is instead related to the limitation of electron release from Photosystem I during the initial stage of the induction period of photosynthesis. This limitation keeps the intersystem electron carriers in the reduced state and thus increases the probability of back electron transfer from Q_A ^– to the donor side of Photosystem II.Abbreviations A_fast/A_slow the ratio of magnitudes between the fast and slow phases of dark relaxation of variable fluorescence - F_O initial level of chlorophyll fluorescence - F_V variable chlorophyll fluorescence (F-F_O) - (F_V)_S the yield of variable chlorophyll fluorescence under saturating pulse in illuminated leaves - (F_V)_M the yield of variable chlorophyll fluorescence under saturating pulse in dark-adapted leaves - PA photoacoustic - PSI Photosystem I - PS II Photosystem II - qN non-photochemical quenching - qQ photochemical quenching     

Theoretical assessment of alternative mechanisms for non-photochemical quenching of PS II fluorescence in barley leaves

The components of non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching (qN) in barley leaves have been quantified by a combination of relaxation kinetics analysis and 77 K fluorescence measurements (Walters RG and Horton P 1991). Analysis of the behaviour of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and oxygen evolution at low light (when only state transitions — measured as qN_t — are present) and at high light (when only photoinhibition — measured as qN_i — is increasing) showed that the parameter qN_t represents quenching processes located in the antenna and that qN_i measures quenching processes located in the reaction centre but which operate significantly only when those centres are closed. The theoretical predictions of a variety of models describing possible mechanisms for high-energy-state quenching, measured as the residual quenching, qN_e, were then tested against the experimental data for both fluorescence quenching and quantum yield of oxygen evolution. Only one model was found to agree with these data, one in which antennae exist in two states, efficient in either energy transfer or energy dissipation, and in which those photosynthetic units in a dissipative state are unable to exchange energy with non-dissipative units.Abbreviations: F_o, F_m room-temperature chlorophyll fluorescence yield with all centres open, closed - F_v variable fluorescence yield - LHC II light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex of PS II - PS I, PS II Photosystem I, II - P700, P680 primary donor in Photosystem I, II - Q_A primary electron acceptor of PS II - P_max maximum quantum yield of oxygen evolution - qN coefficient of non-photochemical quenching of variable fluorescence - qN_e, qN_t, qN_i coefficient of non-photochemical quenching due to high-energy-state, state transition, photoinhibition - qO coefficient of quenching of dark level fluorescence - qP coefficient of photochemical quenching of variable fluorescence - _P intrinsic quantum yield of open PS II reaction centres = _s/qP - _{PS 2} quantum yield of PS = qP × F_v/F_m - _S quantum yield of oxygen evolution = rate of oxygen evolution/light intensity     

The quantum efficiency of photosystem II and its relation to non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence; the effect of measuring-and growth temperature

The relation between the quantum yield of oxygen evolution of open photosystem II reactions centers (_p), calculated according to Weis and Berry (1987), and non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence of plants grown at 19°C and 7°C was measured at 19°C and 7°C. The relation was linear when measured at 19°C, but when measured at 7°C a deviation from linearity was observed at high values of non-photochemical quenching. In plants grown at 7°C this deviation occurred at higher values of non-photochemical quenching than in plants grown at 19°C. The deviations at high light intensity and low temperature are ascribed to an increase in an inhibition-related, non-photochemical quenching component (q_I).The relation between the quantum yield of excitation capture of open photosystem II reaction centers (_exe), calculated according to Genty et al. (1989), and non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence was found to be non-linear and was neither influenced by growth temperature nor by measuring temperature.At high PFD the efficiency of overall steady state electron transport measured by oxygen-evolution, correlated well with the product of q _N and the efficiency of excitation capture (_exe) but it deviated at low PFD. The deviations at low light intensity are attributed to the different populations of chloroplasts measured by gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence and to the light gradient within the leaf.Abbreviations F₀ basic fluorescence - F₀ basic fluorescence, thylakoid in energized state - F_m maximal fluorescence - F_m maximum fluorescence in energized state - F_s steady state fluorescence - F_v maximal variable fluorescence - PFD photon flux density - PS II_rc Photosystem II reaction center - q_F0 quenching of basic fluorescence - q_E energy related quenching - q_N non-photochemical quenching:-q_f-total quenching - q_I inhibition-related quenching - q_p photochemical quenching - q_r quenching due to state transition - R_d dark respiration - _p PS II efficiency of excitation capture of open PS II_rc - _pe extrapolated minimal value of _p - _p0 extrapolated maximal value of _p - _si quantum efficiency of linear electron transport, calculated from gas exchange measurements based on incident light - _sf quantum efficiency of linear electron transport, calculated from fluorescence measurements, based on incident measuring light     

Peroxidation of lipids and growth inhibition induced by UV-B irradiation

Cotyledons excised from dark-grown seedlings of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) were cultured in vitro under UV radiation at different wavelengths, obtained by passage of light through cut-off filters with different transmittance properties. Growth and the synthesis of chlorophyll (Chl) in cotyledons were inhibited and malondialdehyde was accumulated upon irradiation at wavelengths below 320 nm. Exogenous application of scavengers of free radicals reversed the growth inhibition induced by UV-B. Measurement of the fluorescence of Chl a suggested that electron transfer in photosystems was affected by UV-B irradiation. On the basis of these results, the involvement is postulated of active species of oxygen in damages to thylakoid membranes and the growth inhibition that are induced by UV-B irradiation.Abbreviations Chl chlorophyll - F_m maximal fluorescence (dark) - F_m maximal fluorescence (light) - F_v variable fluorescence (dark) - F_v variable fluorescence (light) - MDA malondialdehyde - O₂ Superoxide radical - PS photosystem - q_N non-photochemical quenching of fluorescence - q_P photochemical quenching of fluorescence - UV-B_BE biologically effective UV-B radiation - WL(T = 0.5) wavelength at which 50% transmittance occurs     

State transitions,photosystem stoichiometry adjustment and non-photochemical quenching in cyanobacterial cells acclimated to light absorbed by photosystem I or photosystem II

Cells of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus 6301 were grown in yellow light absorbed primarily by the phycobilisome (PBS) light-harvesting antenna of photosystem II (PS II), and in red light absorbed primarily by chlorophyll and, therefore, by photosystem I (PS I). Chromatic acclimation of the cells produced a higher phycocyanin/chlorophyll ratio and higher PBS-PS II/PS I ratio in cells grown under PS I-light. State 1-state 2 transitions were demonstrated as changes in the yield of chlorophyll fluorescence in both cell types. The amplitude of state transitions was substantially lower in the PS II-light grown cells, suggesting a specific attenuation of fluorescence yield by a superimposed non-photochemical quenching of excitation. 77 K fluorescence emission spectra of each cell type in state 1 and in state 2 suggested that state transitions regulate excitation energy transfer from the phycobilisome antenna to the reaction centre of PS II and are distinct from photosystem stoichiometry adjustments. The kinetics of photosystem stoichiometry adjustment and the kinetics of the appearance of the non-photochemical quenching process were measured upon switching PS I-light grown cells to PS II-light, and vice versa. Photosystem stoichiometry adjustment was complete within about 48 h, while the non-photochemical quenching occurred within about 25 h. It is proposed that there are at least three distinct phenomena exerting specific effects on the rate of light absorption and light utilization by the two photoreactions: state transitions; photosystem stoichiometry adjustment; and non-photochemical excitation quenching. The relationship between these three distinct processes is discussed.Abbreviations Chl chlorophyll - DCMU 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - F relative fluorescence intensity at emission wavelength nm - F _o fluorescence intensity when all PS II traps are open - light 1 light absorbed preferentially by PS I - light 2 light absorbed preferentially by PS II - PBS phycobilisome - PS photosystem     

Temperature-sensitive coupling and uncoupling of ATPase-mediated,nonradiative energy dissipation: Similarities between chloroplasts and leaves

The effects of temperature on the dark relaxation kinetics of nonradiative energy dissipation in photosystem II were compared in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) chloroplasts and leaves of Aegialitis annulata R. Br. After high levels of violaxanthin de-epoxidation in the light, Aegialitis leaves showed a marked delay in the dark relaxation of nonradiative dissipation, measured as non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of photosystem II chlorophyll a fluorescence. Aegialitis leaves also maintained a moderately high adenylate energy charge at low temperatures during and after high-light exposure, presumably because of their limited carbon-fixation capacity. Similarly, dark-sustained NPQ could be induced in lettuce chloroplasts after de-epoxidizing violaxanthin and light-activating the ATP synthase. The duration and extent of dark-sustained NPQ were strongly enhanced by low temperatures in both chloroplasts and leaves. Further, the NPQ sustained at low temperatures was rapidly reversed upon warming. In lettuce chloroplasts, low temperatures sharply decreased the ATP-hydrolysis rate while increasing the duration and extent of the resultant trans-thylakoid proton gradient that elicits the NPQ. This was consistent with a higher degree of energy-coupling, presumably due to reduced proton diffusion through the thylakoid membrane at the lower temperatures. The chloroplast adenylate pool was in equilibrium with the adenylate kinase and therefore both ATP and ADP contributed to reverse coupling. The low-temperature-enhanced NPQ quenched the yields of the dark level (F_o) and the maximal (F_m) fluorescence proportionally in both chloroplasts and leaves. The extent of NPQ in the dark was inversely related to the efficiency of photosystem II, and very similar linear relationships were obtained over a wide temperature range in both chloroplasts and leaves. Likewise, the dark-sustained absorbance changes, caused by violaxanthin de-epoxidation (A_508nm) and energy-dependent light scattering (A_536nm) were strikingly similar in chloroplasts and leaves. Therefore, we conclude that the dark-sustained, low-temperature-stimulated NPQ in chloroplasts and leaves is apparently directly dependent on lumen acidification and chloroplastic ATP hydrolysis. In leaves, the ATP required for sustained NPQ is evidently provided by oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria. The functional significance of this quenching process and implications for measurements of photo-protection versus photodamage in leaves are discussed.Abbreviations and Symbols A antheraxanthin - Chl chlorophyll - DPS de-epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle, ([Z+A]/[V+A+Z]) - F, F steady-state fluorescence in the absence, presence of thylakoid energization - F_o, F_o dark fluorescence level in the absence, presence of thylakoid energization - F_m, F_m maximal fluorescence in absence, presence of thylakoid energization - NPQ nonphotochemical quenching (F_m/F_m)–1 - V violaxanthin - Z zeaxanthin - NRD nonradiative dissipation - PFD photon flux density - [2ATP+ADP] - pH trans-thylakoid proton gradient - S pH-dependent light scattering - _PSII (F_m–F)/F_m, photon yield of PSII photochemistry at the actual reduction state in the light or dark - [ATP+ADP+AMP] We thank Connie Shih for skillful assistance in growing plants and for conducting HPLC analyses. Support from an NSF/USDA/DOE postdoctoral training grant to A.G. is gratefully acknowledged. A.G. also wishes to thank Prof. Govindjee for valuable discussions. C.I.W.-D.P.B. Publication No. 1197.     

Chlorophyll fluorescence in the resurrection plant Selaginella lepidophylla (Hook. & Grev.) Spring during high-light and desiccation stress,and evidence for zeaxanthin-associated photoprotection

The function of photosystem (PS)II during desiccation and exposure to high photon flux density (PFD) was investigated via analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence in the desert resurrection plant Selaginella lepidophylla (Hook. and Grev.) Spring. Exposure of hydrated, physiologically competent stems to 2000 mol · m^–2 · s^–1 PFD caused significant reductions in both intrinsic fluorescence yield (F_O) and photochemical efficiency of PSII (F_V/F_M) but recovery to pre-exposure values was rapid under low PFD. Desiccation under low PFD also affected fluorescence characteristics. Both F_V/F_M and photochemical fluorescence quenching remained high until about 40% relative water content and both then decreased rapidly as plants approached 0% relative water content. In contrast, the maximum fluorescence yield (F_M) decreased and non-photochemical fluorescence quenching increased early during desiccation. In plants dried at high PFD, the decrease in F_V/F_M was accentuated and F_O was reduced, however, fluorescence characteristics returned to near pre-exposure values after 24-h of rehydration and recovery at low PFD. Pretreatment of stems with dithiothreitol, an inhibitor of zeaxanthin synthesis, accelerated the decline in F_V/F_M and significantly increased F_O relative to controls at 925 mol · m^–2 · s^–1 PFD, and the differences persisted over a 3-h low-PFD recovery period. Pretreatment with dithiothreitol also significantly decreased non-photochemical fluorescence quenching, increased the reduction state of Q_A, the primary electron acceptor of PSII, and prevented the synthesis of zeaxanthin relative to controls when stems were exposed to PFDs in excess of 250 mol · m^–2 · s^–1. These results indicate that a zeaxanthin-associated mechanism of photoprotection exists in this desert pteridophyte that may help to prevent photoinhibitory damage in the fully hydrated state and which may play an additional role in protecting PSII as thylakoid membranes undergo water loss.Abbreviations and Symbols DTT dithiothreitol - EPS epoxidation state - F_O yield of instantaneous fluorescence at open PSII centers - F_M maximum yield of fluorescence at closed PSII centers induced by saturating light - F_M F_M determined during actinic illumination - F_V yield of variable fluorescence (F_M-F_O) - F_V/F_M photochemical efficiency of PSII - q_P photochemical fluorescence quenching - q_NP non-photochemical fluorescence quenching of Schreiber et al. (1986) - NPQ non-photochemical fluorescence quenching from the Stern-Volmer equation - PFD photon flux density - RWC relative water content This paper is based on research done while W.G.E. was on leave of absence at Duke University during the fall of 1990. We would like to thank Dan Yakir, John Skillman, Steve Grace, and Suchandra Balachandran and many others at Duke University for their help and input with this research. Dr. Barbara Demmig-Adams provided zeaxanthin for standard-curve purposes.     

Resolution of components of non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching in barley leaves

Non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching (qN) in barley leaves has been analysed by monitoring its relaxation in the dark, by applying saturating pulses of light. At least three kinetically distinct phases to qN recovery are observed, which have previously been identified (Quick and Stitt 1989) as being due to high-energy state quenching (fast), excitation energy redistribution due to a state transition (medium) and photoinhibition (slow). However, measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence at 77 K from leaf extracts show that state transitions only occur in low light conditions, whereas the medium component of qN is very large in high light. The source of that part of the medium component not accounted for by a state transition is discussed.Abbreviations ATP adenosine 5-triphosphate - DCMU 3[3,4-dichlorophenyl]-1,1 dimethylurea - pH trans-thylakoid pH gradient - F_o, F_m room-temperature chlorophyll fluorescence yield with all reaction centres open, closed - F_v variable fluorescence = F_m–F_o - LHC II Light harvesting complex II - PS I, PS II Photosystem I, II - P700, P680 primary donor in photosystem I, II - qP photochemical quenching of variable fluorescence - qN non-photochemical quenching of variable fluorescence - qN_e, qN_t, qN_i non-photochemical quenching due to high energy state, state transition, photoinhibition - qN_f, qN_m, qN_s components of qN relaxing fast, medium, slow - q_r quenching of r relative to the dark state - tricine N-tris[hydroxymethyl]methylglycine - r ratio of fluorescence maximum from photosystem II to that from photosystem I at 77 K     

Nigericin insensitive post-illumination reduction in fluorescence yield in Dunaliella tertiolecta (chlorophyte)

Cells of the green alga Dunaliella tertiolecta grown in a light/dark cycle were exposed to high light for about 15 min. In light, energy-dependent quenching reduced fluorescence emission and decreased PS II efficiency. Within 3 minutes after darkening fluorescence quenching largely relaxed. However, PS II fluorescence emission decreased again after further darkening. F_o and F_m decreased to the same relative extent and the PS II efficiency was not reduced. This Reduction in Fluorescence yield in Darkness, termed RFD for the purpose of this paper, lasted about 20 min. The deepoxidation state of xanthophylls remained unchanged during and after the 15-min exposure to high light. We show that RFD is insensitive to the uncoupler nigericin and thus unrelated to energy-dependent quenching. RFD correlated with a reduction of the PQ pool after darkening and low levels of far red or blue light (430 nm more than 460 nm) prevented RFD. This is in contrast to observations in higher plants, where a post-illumination reduction of the PQ pool causes and increase in F_o (Groom et al. (1993) Photosynth Res 36: 205–215). Changes in the adenylate energy charge were not correlated with RFD. Antimycin A and cyanide, both inhibitors of the PQ-oxidase, caused an increase in RFD whereas SHAM, an inhibitor of the chloroplastic glycolate-quinone oxidoreductase, caused a decrease. Low CO₂ concentrations, known to increase the oxygenase activity of Rubisco and to generate glycolate and P-glycolate in light, caused an increase in RFD. We propose that accumulated glycolate and P-glycolate reduce the PQ pool in darkness, leading to the formation of RFD. During RFD, 77 K fluorescence emission from PS II was more reduced than that from PS I, thus resembling a state I, state II transition. However, the reduction in fluorescence yield during RFD is much larger than the reduction previously attributed to state transitions and it is unclear whether RFD and state transitions are identical. The formation and relaxation of RFD increased with higher temperatures and the extent of RFD was largest at the growth temperature (25°C). RFD has to be taken into account when fluorescence is measured after darkening as it may be mistaken for energy-dependent quenching.Abbreviations F_o fluorescence, measured when PS II traps are open - F_o difference between F_o and F_o - F_m fluorescence, measured when PS II traps are temporarily closed - F_m difference between F_m and F_m - FR far red - PFD photosynthetically active photon flux density - PQ plastoquinone - RFD reduction in fluorescence in darkness - SHAM salicylhydroxamic acid - Q_A primary quinone acceptor of PS II     

In situ photosynthetic differentiation of the green algal and the cyanobacterial photobiont in the crustose lichen Placopsis contortuplicata

In situ photosynthetic activity in the green algal and the cyanobacterial photobionts of Placopsis contortuplicata was monitored within the same thallus using chlorophyll a fluorescence methods. It proved possible to show that the response to hydration of the green algal and the cyanobacterial photobionts is different within the same thallus. Measurements of the photochemical efficiency of PS II, Fv/Fm, reveal that in the dry lichen thallus photosynthetic activity could be induced in the green algal photobiont by water vapour uptake, in the cyanobacterial photobiont only if it was hydrated with liquid water. However, rates of apparent electron flow through PS II as well as rates of CO₂ gas exchange were suboptimal after hydration with water vapour alone and maximum rates could only be observed when the thallus was saturated with liquid water. The differences in the waterrelated photosynthetic performance and different light response curves of apparent electron transport rate through PS II indicate that the two photobionts act highly independently of each other. It was shown that the cyanobacteria from the cephalodia in P. contortuplicata act as photobiont. The rate of electron flow through PS II was found to be saturated at 1500 mol photon m^–2 s^–1, despite a considerable increase of non-photochemical quenching in the green algal photobiont which is lacking in the cyanobacterial photobiont. No evidence of photoinhibition could be found in either photobiont. Pronounced competition between the green algal and the cyanobacterial thallus can be observed in the natural habitat, indicating that the symbiosis in P. contortuplicata should be regarded as a very variable adaptation to the extreme environmental conditions in the maritime Antarctic.Abbreviations DR dark respiration - ETR apparent rate of electron flow of PS II (=F/Fm×PFD) - F difference in yield of fluorescence and maximal Fm and steady state Fs under ambient light - Fo minimum level of fluorescence yield in dark-adapted state - Fo minimum level of fluorescence yield after transient darkening and far-red illumination - Fm maximum level of dark-adapted fluorescence yield - Fm maximum yield of fluorescence under ambient light - Fs yield of fluorescence at steady state - Fv difference in minimum fluorescence and maximum fluorescence in dark-adapted state - NP net photosynthesis - NPQ coefficient for non-photochemical quenching - PAR photosynthetically active radiation (400–700 nm) - PFD photon flux density in PAR - PS II photosystem II - qN coefficient for non-photochemical quenching - qP coefficient for photochemical quenching     

A study on the energy-dependent quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence by means of photoacoustic measurements

The mechanism of energy-dependent quenching (q_E) of chlorophyll fluorescence was studied employing photoacoustic measurements of oxygen evolution and heat release. It is shown that concomitant to the formation of q_E the yield of open reaction centers _p decreases indicating that q_E quenching originates from a process being competitive to fluorescence as well as to photochemistry. The analysis of heat release (rate of thermal deactivation) shows: 1. The competitive process is not given by a still unknown energy storing process. 2. If the competitive process would be a futile cycle the life-times of the involved intermediates had to be faster than 50 s.The results of the photoacoustic measurements are in line with the idea that q_E quenching originates from an increased probability of thermal deactivation of excited chlorophylls.Abbreviations F actual fluorescence - F_m fluorescence yield with all PS II reaction centers closed in a light adapted state - F₀ fluorescence yield with all PS II reaction centers open in a light adapted state - PS Photosystem - _p intrinsic photochemical yield - q_E energy-dependent quenching - q_I photoinhibition quenching - q_N non-photochemical quenching - q_P photochemical quenching - q_T state transition quenching     

Stress-induced chlorosis and increase in D1-protein turnover precede photoinhibition in spinach suffering under magnesium/sulphur deficiency

To test wether chlorosis is induced by photoinhibitory damage to photosystem II (PSII), onset of chlorosis and loss of PSII function were compared in young spinach (Spinaciae oleracea L.) plants suffering under a combined magnesium and sulphur deficiency. Loss of chlorophyll already occurred after the first week of deficiency and preceded any permanent functional inhibition of the photosynthetic apparatus. Permanent disturbancies of photosynthetic electron transport measured in isolated thylakoids and of PSII function, determined via the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximal fluorescence, F_v/F_m, could be detected only after the second week of deficiency. After the third week, the plants had lost about 60% of their chlorophyll; even so, fluorescence data indicated that 85% of the existing PSII was still capable of initiating photosynthetic electron transport. However, quenching analysis of steady-state fluorescence showed an early increase in non-photochemical quenching and in down-regulated PSII centres with low steady-state quantum efficiency. Together with the down-regulation of PSII centres, a 1.4-fold increase in D1-protein synthesis, measured as incorporation of [¹⁴C]leucine, could be observed at the end of the first week before any loss of D1 protein, chlorophyll or photosynthetic activity could be detected. Immunological determiation by Western-blotting did not show a change in D1-protein content; thus, at this time, D1 protein was not only faster synthesised but was also faster degraded than before the imposition of mineral deficiency. The increased turnover was high enough to prevent any loss or functional inhibition of PSII. After 3 weeks, D1-protein synthesis on a chlorophyll basis was further stimulated by a factor of 2. However, this was not enough to prevent a net loss of D1 protein of about 70%, showing that the D1-protein was now degraded faster than it was synthesised. Immunological determination and electron-transport measurements showed that together with the loss of D1 protein the other polypetides of PSII were also degraded, resulting in a specific loss of PSII centres. The degradation of PSII centres prevented a large accumulation of damaged PSII centres. We assume that the decrease in PSII centres initiates the breakdown of the other thylakoid proteins.Abbreviations Fo yield of intrinsic fluorescence when all PSII centres are open in the dark - F_m yield of maximal fluorescence when all reaction centres are closed - F_m fluorescence yield when all reaction centres are closed under steady-state conditions - F_v yield of variable fluorescence, (difference between F_o and F_m) - F yield of variable fluorescence under steady-state conditions, difference between F_m and F_t, the fluorescence yield under steady-state conditions - PFD photon flux density - Q_A primary quinone acceptor of PSII - Q_B secondary quinone acceptor of PSII - q_p photochemical quenching - q_n non-photochemical quenching This work was supported by grants from the Bundesminister für Forschung und Technologie and the German Israeli Foundation. The authors thank Prof. I. Ohad (Department of Biological Chemistry, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel) for fruitful discussions.     

Non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll a fluorescence in isolated chloroplasts under conditions of stressed photosynthesis

Non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll a fluorescence after short-time light, heat and osmotic stress was investigated with intact chloroplasts from Spinacia oleracea L. The proportions of non-photochemical fluorescence quenching (q _N ) which are related (q _E ) and unrelated (q _I ) to the transthylakoid proton gradient (pH) were determined. Light stress resulted in an increasing contribution of q _Ito total q _N.The linear dependence of q. _Eand pH, as seen in controls, was maintained. The mechanisms underlying this type of quenching are obviously unaffected by photoin-hibition. In constrast, q _Ewas severely affected by heat and osmotic stress. In low light, the response of q _Eto changes in pH was enhanced, whereas it was reduced in high light. The data are discussed with reference to the hypothesis that q _Eis related to thermal dissipation of excitation energy from photosystem II. It is shown that q _Eis not only controlled by pH, but also by external factors.Abbreviations and symbols 9-AA 9-aminoacridine - F _o basic chlorophyll fluorescence - F _o variable chlorophyll fluorescence - L ₂ saturating light pulse - PS photosystem - q _E pH-dependent, non-photochemical quenching of fluorescence - q _I pH-independent, non-photochemical quenching - q _N entire non-photochemical quenching - q _Q photochemical quenching     

Non-photochemical fluorescence quenching and the diadinoxanthin cycle in a marine diatom

The diadinoxanthin cycle (DD-cycle) in chromophyte algae involves the interconversion of two carotenoids, diadinoxanthin (DD) and diatoxanthin (DT). We investigated the kinetics of light-induced DD-cycling in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum and its role in dissipating excess excitation energy in PS II. Within 15 min following an increase in irradiance, DT increased and was accompanied by a stoichiometric decrease in DD. This reaction was completely blocked by dithiothreitol (DTT). A second, time-dependent, increase in DT was detected 20 min after the light shift without a concomitant decrease in DD. DT accumulation from both processes was correlated with increases in non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Stern-Volmer analyses suggests that changes in non-photochemical quenching resulted from changes in thermal dissipation in the PS II antenna and in the reaction center. The increase in non-photochemical quenching was correlated with a small decrease in the effective absorption cross section of PS II. Model calculations suggest however that the changes in cross section are not sufficiently large to significantly reduce multiple excitation of the reaction center within the turnover time of steady-state photosynthetic electron transport at light saturation. In DTT poisoned cells, the change in non-photochemical quenching appears to result from energy dissipation in the reaction center and was associated with decreased photochemical efficiency. D1 protein degradation was slightly higher in samples poisoned with DTT than in control samples. These results suggest that while DD-cycling may dynamically alter the photosynthesis-irradiance response curve, it offers limited protection against photodamage of PS II reaction centers at irradiance levels sufficient to saturate steady-state photosynthesis.Abbreviations CAP chloramphenicol - D1 PS II reaction center protein - DD diadinoxanthin - DD cycle-diadinoxanthin cycle - DT diatoxanthin - DTT dithiothreitol - FCP fucoxanthin chlorophyll a-c protein - F_m maximum fluorescence yield in the dark-adapted state - F_o minimum fluorescence yield in the dark-adapted state - F_m and F_o maximum and minimum fluorescence yields respectively in some light adapted state - F_v maximum variable fluorescence yield in the dark-adapted state - I_k Irradiance at the intercept of the initial slope of the photosynthesis-irradiance curve and the maximum photosynthetic rate - k_D first order rate constant for nonradiative de-excitation of excitions in the PS II antenna - k_d first order rate constant for non-radiative de-excitation of excitons in the PS II reaction center - k_F first order rate constant for fluorescence - k_T first order rate constant for exciton transfer to the reaction center - k_t first order rate constant for exciton transfer from the reaction center to the antenna - Rubisco ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase - SV_m Stern-Volmer quenching coefficient of the maximum fluorescence yield - SV_o Stern-Volmer quenching coefficient of the miniximum fluorescence yield - _{PS II} apparent absorption cross-section of PS II - _arr average interval between exciton arrival to the PS II reaction center (ms) - _rem average interval between electron turnover during photosynthesis in the PS II reaction center (ms) - _d the probability that an exciton is non-radiatively dissipated in the reaction center - _T the probability that an exciton in the antenna is transferred to the reaction center - _t the probability that an exciton is transferred back from the reaction center to the antenna     

Predicting CO2 gain and photosynthetic light acclimation from fluorescence yield and quenching in cyano-lichens

Modulated chlorophylla fluorescence is useful for eco-physiological studies of lichens as it is sensitive, non-invasive and specific to the photobiont. We assessed the validity of using fluorescence yield to predict CO₂ gain in cyano-lichens, by simultaneous measurements of CO₂ gas exchange and chlorophylla fluorescence in five species withNostoc-photobionts. For comparison, O₂ evolution and fluorescence were measured in isolated cells ofNostoc, derived fromPeltigera canina (Nostoc PC). At irradiances up to the growth light level, predictions from fluorescence yield underestimated true photosynthesis, to various extents depending on species. This reflected the combined effect of a state transition in darkness, which was not fully relaxed until the growth light level was reached, and a phycobilin contribution to the minimum fluorescence yield (F_o). Above the growth light level, the model progressively overestimated assimilation, reflecting increased electron flow to oxygen under excess irradiance. In cyanobacteria, this flow maintains photosystem II centres open even up to photoinhibitory light levels without contributing to CO₂ fixation. Despite this we show that gross CO₂ gain may be predicted from fluorescence yield also in cyanolichens when the analysis is made near the acclimated growth light level. This level can be obtained even when measurements are performed in the field, since it coincides with a minimum in non-photochemical fluorescence quenching (NPQ). However, the absolute relation between fluorescence yield and gross CO₂ gain varies between species. It may therefore be necessary to standardise the fluorescence prediction for each species with CO₂ gas exchange.Abbreviations CCM CO₂-Concentrating mechanism - Chl chlorophyll - C_i inorganic carbon - 0 convexity (curvature of the light response curve) - ETR electron transport rate - F_o minimum fluorescence yield - F_m maximal fluorescence yield - F_s fluorescence yield at steady-state photosynthesis - F_v variable fluorescence yield - F_v/F_m dark ratio of variable to maximal fluorescence yield after dark adaptation - F_vF_mmax ratio of variable to maximal fluorescence yield in the absence of quenching - _CO2 maximum quantum yield of CO₂ assimilation - _PS quantum yield of photosystem II photochemistry - GP gross photosynthesis - I irradiance (mol quanta·m^–2·s^–1) - NPQ non photochemical fluorescence quenching - qp photochemical fluorescence quenching     

Relationship Between Photosystem 2 Electron Transport and Photosynthetic CO2 Assimilation Responses to Irradiance in Young Apple Tree Leaves

The responses to irradiance of photosynthetic CO₂ assimilation and photosystem 2 (PS2) electron transport were simultaneously studied by gas exchange and chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence measurement in two-year-old apple tree leaves (Malus pumila Mill. cv. Tengmu No.1/Malus hupehensis Rehd). Net photosynthetic rate (P _N) was saturated at photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) 600-1 100 (mol m^-2 s^-1, while the PS2 non-cyclic electron transport (P-rate) showed a maximum at PPFD 800 mol m^-2 s^-1. With PPFD increasing, either leaf potential photosynthetic CO₂ assimilation activity (F_d/F_s) and PS2 maximal photochemical activity (F_v/F_m) decreased or the ratio of the inactive PS2 reaction centres (RC) [(F_i – F_o)/(F_m – F_o)] and the slow relaxing non-photochemical Chl fluorescence quenching (q_s) increased from PPFD 1 200 mol m^-2 s^-1, but cyclic electron transport around photosystem 1 (RFp), irradiance induced PS2 RC closure [(F_s – F_o)/F_m – F_o)], and the fast and medium relaxing non-photochemical Chl fluorescence quenching (q_f and q_m) increased remarkably from PPFD 900 (mol m^-2 s^-1. Hence leaf photosynthesis of young apple leaves saturated at PPFD 800 mol m^-2 s^-1 and photoinhibition occurred above PPFD 900 mol m^-2 s^-1. During the photoinhibition at different irradiances, young apple tree leaves could dissipate excess photons mainly by energy quenching and state transition mechanisms at PPFD 900-1 100 mol m^-2 s^-1, but photosynthetic apparatus damage was unavoidable from PPFD 1 200 mol m^-2 s^-1. We propose that Chl fluorescence parameter P-rate is superior to the gas exchange parameter P _N and the Chl fluorescence parameter F_v/F_m as a definition of saturation irradiance and photoinhibition of plant leaves.