Molluscan catch muscle myorod and its N-terminal peptide bind to F-actin and myosin in a phosphorylation-dependent manner

Myorod is expressed exclusively in molluscan catch muscle and localizes on the surface of thick filaments together with twitchin and myosin. This protein is an alternatively spliced product of the myosin heavy-chain gene containing the C-terminal rod part of myosin and a unique N-terminal domain. We have recently reported that this unique domain is a target for phosphorylation by gizzard smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and molluscan twitchin, which contains a MLCK-like domain. To elucidate the role of myorod phosphorylation in catch muscle, a peptide corresponding to the specific N-terminal region of the protein was synthesized in phosphorylated and unphosphorylated form. We report, for the first time, that unphosphorylated full-length myorod and its unphosphorylated N-terminal synthetic peptide are able to interact with rabbit F-actin and thin filaments from molluscan catch muscle. The binding between thin filaments and the peptide was Ca²⁺-dependent. In addition, we found that phosphorylated N-terminal peptide of myorod has higher affinity for myosin compared to the unphosphorylated peptide. Together, these observations suggest the direct involvement of the N-terminal domain of myorod in the regulation of molluscan catch muscle.     

Catch muscle of bivalve molluscs contains myosin- and twitchin-associated protein kinase phosphorylating myorod

We have shown previously that myorod, a molluscan thick filament protein of unknown function, is phosphorylated by vertebrate smooth myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) in N-terminal unique region. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether such phosphorylation may occur in molluscan muscles. We detected three kinases endogenous to molluscan catch muscle, namely, to the complex of surface thick filament proteins that consists of twitchin, myosin, and myorod. The first kinase was a protein kinase A because it was inhibited by a specific inhibitor; the second one was associated with twitchin and phosphorylated myorod at its N-terminal unique region independently of Ca²⁺; and the third kinase was bound to myosin and phosphorylated myorod as well as myosin in the C-terminal part of both proteins. The myosin-associated kinase was inhibited by micromolar concentration of calcium ions. This enzyme could be separated from myosin by chromatography, whereas the kinase associated with twitchin could not be separated from twitchin. Since twitchin has a MLCK-like domain, it is possible that this domain was responsible for myorod phosphorylation. Phosphorylation of myorod within the twitchin–myosin–myorod complex increased the actin-activated Mg²⁺-ATPase activity of myosin. Taken together, these results indicate that phosphorylation of myorod by kinases associated with key proteins of catch contraction may contribute to the functional activity of myorod in molluscan smooth muscle.     

Catch Muscle Myorod Modulates ATPase Activity of Myosin in a Phosphorylation-Dependent Way

Myorod is expressed exclusively in molluscan catch muscle and localizes on the surface of thick filaments together with twitchin and myosin. Myorod is an alternatively spliced product of the myosin heavy-chain gene that contains the C-terminal rod part of myosin and a unique N-terminal domain. The unique domain is a target for phosphorylation by gizzard smooth myosin light chain kinase (smMLCK) and, perhaps, molluscan twitchin, which contains a MLCK-like domain. To elucidate the role of myorod and its phosphorylation in the catch muscle, the effect of chromatographically purified myorod on the actin-activated Mg²⁺-ATPase activity of myosin was studied. We found that phosphorylation at the N-terminus of myorod potentiated the actin-activated Mg²⁺-ATPase activity of mussel and rabbit myosins. This potentiation occurred only if myorod was phosphorylated and introduced into the ATPase assay as a co-filament with myosin. We suggest that myorod could be related to the catch state, a function specific to molluscan muscle.     

"Twitchin-actin linkage hypothesis" for the catch mechanism in molluscan muscles: evidence that twitchin interacts with myosin, myorod, and paramyosin core and affects properties of actomyosin

"Twitchin-actin linkage hypothesis" for the catch mechanism in molluscan smooth muscles postulates in vivo existence of twitchin links between thin and thick filaments that arise in a phosphorylation-dependent manner [N.S. Shelud'ko, G.G. Matusovskaya, T.V. Permyakova, O.S. Matusovsky, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 432 (2004) 269-277]. In this paper, we proposed a scheme for a possible catch mechanism involving twitchin links and regulated thin filaments. The experimental evidence in support of the scheme is provided. It was found that twitchin can interact not only with mussel myosin and rabbit F-actin but also with the paramyosin core of thick filaments, myorod, mussel thin filaments, "natural" F-actin from mussel, and skeletal myosin from rabbit. No difference was revealed in binding of twitchin with mussel and rabbit myosin. The capability of twitchin to interact with all thick filament proteins suggests that putative twitchin links can be attached to any site of thick filaments. Addition of twitchin to a mixture of actin and paramyosin filaments, or to a mixture of Ca(2+)-regulated actin and myosin filaments under relaxing conditions caused in both cases similar changes in the optical properties of suspensions, indicating an interaction and aggregation of the filaments. The interaction of actin and myosin filaments in the presence of twitchin under relaxing conditions was not accompanied by an appreciable increase in the MgATPase activity. We suggest that in both cases aggregation of filaments was caused by formation of twitchin links between the filaments. We also demonstrate that native thin filaments from the catch muscle of the mussel Crenomytilus grayanus are Ca(2+)-regulated. Twitchin inhibits the ability of thin filaments to activate myosin MgATPase in the presence of Ca(2+). We suggest that twitchin inhibition of the actin-myosin interaction is due to twitchin-induced switching of the thin filaments to the inactive state.     

Inhibition of the ATP-dependent interaction of actin and myosin by the catalytic domain of the myosin light chain kinase of smooth muscle: possible involvement in smooth muscle relaxation

Myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) phosphorylates the light chain of smooth muscle myosin enabling its interaction with actin. This interaction initiates smooth muscle contraction. MLCK has another role that is not attributable to its phosphorylating activity, i.e., it inhibits the ATP-dependent movement of actin filaments on a glass surface coated with phosphorylated myosin. To analyze the inhibitory effect of MLCK, the catalytic domain of MLCK was obtained with or without the regulatory sequence adjacent to the C-terminal of the domain, and the inhibitory effect of the domain was examined by the movement of actin filaments. All the domains work so as to inhibit actin filament movement whether or not the regulatory sequence is included. When the domain includes the regulatory sequence, calmodulin in the presence of calcium abolishes the inhibition. Since the phosphorylation reaction is not involved in regulating the movement by MLCK, and a catalytic fragment that shows no kinase activity also inhibits movement, the kinase activity is not related to inhibition. Higher concentrations of MLCK inhibit the binding of actin filaments to myosin-coated surfaces as well as their movement. We discuss the dual roles of the domain, the phosphorylation of myosin that allows myosin to cross-bridge with actin and a novel function that breaks cross-bridging.     

N-ethylmaleimide inhibits polymerization of myorod, a contractile protein of thick filaments of molluscan smooth muscles

The effect of N-ethylmaleimide on the polymerization of myorod, a protein of molluscan smooth muscles, which is colocalized with myosin on the surface of paramyosin core of thick filaments and is a product of the alternative splicing of the gene of heavy myosin chains, was studied. It was shown that myorod modified by N-ethylmaleimide completely loses the polymerization ability but acquires the ability to aggregate in the presence of Mg2+. At the same time, treatment of molluscan myosin with N-ethylmaleimide did not affect its polymerization. It was supposed that the effect of N-ethylmaleimide on myorod polymerization is related to the modification of the myorod SH domain containing Cys722.     

Twitchin of mollusc smooth muscles can induce “catch”-like properties in human skeletal muscle: support for the assumption that the “catch” state involves twitchin linkages between myofilaments

Molluscan catch muscles can maintain tension with low or even no energy utilization, and therefore, they represent ideal models for studying energy-saving holding states. For many decades it was assumed that catch is due to a simple slowing of the force-generating myosin head cross-bridge cycles. However, recently evidences increased suggesting that catch is rather caused by passive structures linking the myofilaments in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. One possible linkage structure is the titin-like thick filament protein twitchin, which could form bridges to the thin filaments. Twitchin is known to regulate the catch state depending on its phosphorylation state. Here, we found that twitchin induces a catch-like stiffness in skinned human skeletal muscle fibres, when these fibres are exposed to this protein. Subsequent phosphorylation of twitchin reduces the stiffness. These findings support the assumption that catch of molluscan smooth muscle involves twitchin linkages between thick and thin filaments.     

Polymerization of myorod, a surface protein of thick filaments of molluscan smooth muscle

The study is concerned with the polymerization of myorod, a protein from thick filaments of molluscan smooth muscles, which is an alternative product of the gene of myosin heavy chains. The dependences of the properties and polymer structure of myorod on the conditions of its formation were investigated. It was shown that myorod loses the ability to form viscous polymers after proteolytic removal of the unique sequence. It was supposed that the specificity of polymerization of myorod are determined by its unique N-terminal sequence.     

Expression of several domains of twitchin and myorod in the ontogenesis of mussel Mytilus trossulus

The expression of MLCK- and PEVK-domains of twitchin, as well as the unique N-terminal domain of myorod in early development of the mussel Mytilus trossulus has been studied. The MLCK-domain of twitchin and the unique N-terminal domain of myorod appear at the early stages of development, whereas the PEVK-domain of twitchin is present only in muscles of adult mussel. The sizes of genes of the N-terminal domain of myorod, obtained at the blastula stage and from the adult animal are similar, but the proteins have significant differences in the amino acid sequences. Consequently, myorod and twitchin appear at early stages of larval mussels before the formation of "adult" muscles capable of catch contraction, and at these stages both proteins are isoforms, which differ from the isoforms of adult animals. It is possible that the MLCK-domain in the "larval" isoform of twitchin is necessary for regulating the formation of the contractile apparatus of molluscan smooth muscles, while the PEVK-domain is important for the regulation of the catch state in muscles of adult animals.     

Expression of several domains of twitchin and myorod in the ontogeny of the mussel <Emphasis Type="Italic">Mytilus trossulus</Emphasis>

The expression of MLCK- and PEVK-domains of twitchin, as well as the unique N-terminal domain of myorod in early development of the mussel Mytilus trossulus has been studied. The MLCK-domain of twitchin and the unique N-terminal domain of myorod appear at the early stages of development, whereas the PEVK-domain of twitchin is present only in muscles of adult mussel. The sizes of genes of the N-terminal domain of myorod, obtained at the blastula stage and from the adult animal are similar, but the proteins have significant differences in the amino acid sequences. Consequently, myorod and twitchin appear at early stages of larval mussels before the formation of “adult” muscles capable of catch contraction, and at these stages both proteins are isoforms, which differ from the isoforms of adult animals. It is possible that the MLCK-domain in the “larval” isoform of twitchin is necessary for regulating the formation of the contractile apparatus of molluscan smooth muscles, while the PEVK-domain is important for the regulation of the catch state in muscles of adult animals.     

Vectorial activation of smooth muscle myosin filaments and its modulation by telokin

Smooth muscle myosin copurifies with myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and calmodulin (CaM) as well as with variable amounts of myosin phosphatase. Therefore, myosin filaments formed in vitro also contain relatively high levels of these enzymes. Thus these filaments may be considered to be native-like because they are similar to those expected to exist in vivo. These endogenous enzymes are present at high concentrations relative to myosin, sufficient for rapid phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the filaments at rates comparable to those observed for contraction and relaxation in intact muscle strips. The phosphorylation by MLCK/CaM complex appears to exhibit some directionality and is not governed by a random diffusional process. For the mixtures of myosin filaments with and without the endogenous MLCK/CaM complex, the complex preferentially phosphorylates its own parent filament at a higher rate than the neighboring filaments. This selective or vectorial-like activation is lost or absent when myosin filaments are dissolved at high ionic strength. Similar vectorial-like activation is exhibited by the reconstituted filament suspensions, but the soluble systems composed of isolated regulatory light chain or soluble myosin head subfragments exhibit normal diffusional kinetic behavior. At physiological concentrations, kinase related protein (telokin) effectively modulates the activation process by reducing the phosphorylation rate of the filaments without affecting the overall phosphorylation level. This results from telokin-induced liberation of the active MLCK/CaM complex from the filaments, so that the latter can also activate the neighboring filaments via a slower diffusional process. When this complex is bound at insufficient levels, this actually results in acceleration of the initial phosphorylation rates. In short, I suggest that in smooth muscle, telokin plays a chaperone role for myosin and its filaments.     

Diffusion of myosin light chain kinase on actin: A mechanism to enhance myosin phosphorylation rates in smooth muscle

Smooth muscle myosin (SMM) light chain kinase (MLCK) phosphorylates SMM, thereby activating the ATPase activity required for muscle contraction. The abundance of active MLCK, which is tightly associated with the contractile apparatus, is low relative to that of SMM. SMM phosphorylation is rapid despite the low ratio of MLCK to SMM, raising the question of how one MLCK rapidly phosphorylates many SMM molecules. We used total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to monitor single molecules of streptavidin-coated quantum dot–labeled MLCK interacting with purified actin, actin bundles, and stress fibers of smooth muscle cells. Surprisingly, MLCK and the N-terminal 75 residues of MLCK (N75) moved on actin bundles and stress fibers of smooth muscle cell cytoskeletons by a random one-dimensional (1-D) diffusion mechanism. Although diffusion of proteins along microtubules and oligonucleotides has been observed previously, this is the first characterization to our knowledge of a protein diffusing in a sustained manner along actin. By measuring the frequency of motion, we found that MLCK motion is permitted only if acto–myosin and MLCK–myosin interactions are weak. From these data, diffusion coefficients, and other kinetic and geometric considerations relating to the contractile apparatus, we suggest that 1-D diffusion of MLCK along actin (a) ensures that diffusion is not rate limiting for phosphorylation, (b) allows MLCK to locate to areas in which myosin is not yet phosphorylated, and (c) allows MLCK to avoid getting “stuck” on myosins that have already been phosphorylated. Diffusion of MLCK along actin filaments may be an important mechanism for enhancing the rate of SMM phosphorylation in smooth muscle.     

Functional role of the C-terminal domain of smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase on the phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin

Smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) is known to bind to thin filaments and myosin filaments. Telokin, an independently expressed protein with an identical amino acid sequence to that of the C-terminal domain of MLCK, has been shown to bind to unphosphorylated smooth muscle myosin. Thus, the functional significance of the C-terminal domain and the molecular morphology of MLCK were examined in detail. The C-terminal domain was removed from MLCK by alpha-chymotryptic digestion, and the activity of the digested MLCK was measured using myosin or the isolated 20-kDa light chain (LC20) as a substrate. The results showed that the digestion increased K(m) for myosin 3-fold whereas it did not change the value for LC20. In addition, telokin inhibited the phosphorylation of myosin by MLCK by increasing K(m) but only slightly increased K(m) for LC20. Electron microscopy indicated that MLCK was an elongated molecule but was flexible so as to form folded conformations. MLCK was crosslinked to unphosphorylated heavy meromyosin with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide in the absence of Ca(2+)/calmodulin (CaM), and electron microscopic observation of the products revealed that the MLCK molecule bound to the head-tail junction of heavy meromyosin. These results suggest that MLCK binds to the head-tail junction of unphosphorylated myosin through its C-terminal domain, where LC20 can be promptly phosphorylated through its catalytic domain following the Ca(2+)/CaM-dependent activation.     

Twitchin, a thick-filament protein from molluscan catch muscle, interacts with F-actin in a phosphorylation-dependent way

Twitchin belongs to the titin-like giant proteins family, it is co-localized with thick filaments in molluscan catch muscles and regulates the catch state depending on its level of phosphorylation. The mechanism by which twitchin controls the catch state remains to be established. We report for the first time the ability of twitchin to interact with F-actin. The interaction is observed at low and physiological ionic strengths, irrespective of the presence or absence of Ca(2+). It was demonstrated by viscosity and turbidity measurements, low- and high-speed co-sedimentation, and with the light-scattering particle size analysis revealing the specific twitchin-actin particles. The twitchin-actin interaction is regulated by twitchin phosphorylation: in vitro phosphorylated twitchin does not interact with F-actin. We speculate that the catch muscle twitchin might provide a mechanical link between thin and thick filaments, which contributes to catch force maintenance.     

The N-terminal region of twitchin binds thick and thin contractile filaments: redundant mechanisms of catch force maintenance

Catch force maintenance in invertebrate smooth muscles is probably mediated by a force-bearing tether other than myosin cross-bridges between thick and thin filaments. The phosphorylation state of the mini-titin twitchin controls catch. The C-terminal phosphorylation site (D2) of twitchin with its flanking Ig domains forms a phosphorylation-sensitive complex with actin and myosin, suggesting that twitchin is the tether (Funabara, D., Osawa, R., Ueda, M., Kanoh, S., Hartshorne, D. J., and Watabe, S. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 18015-18020). Here we show that a region near the N terminus of twitchin also interacts with thick and thin filaments from Mytilus anterior byssus retractor muscles. Both a recombinant protein, including the D1 and DX phosphorylation sites with flanking 7th and 8th Ig domains, and a protein containing just the linker region bind to thin filaments with about a 1:1 mol ratio to actin and K(d) values of 1 and 15 μM, respectively. Both proteins show a decrease in binding when phosphorylated. The unphosphorylated proteins increase force in partially activated permeabilized muscles, suggesting that they are sufficient to tether thick and thin filaments. There are two sites of thin filament interaction in this region because both a 52-residue peptide surrounding the DX site and a 47-residue peptide surrounding the D1 site show phosphorylation-dependent binding to thin filaments. The peptides relax catch force, confirming the region's central role in the mechanism of catch. The multiple sites of thin filament interaction in the N terminus of twitchin in addition to those in the C terminus provide an especially secure and redundant mechanical link between thick and thin filaments in catch.     

Role of non-kinase activity of myosin light-chain kinase in regulating smooth muscle contraction, a review dedicated to Dr. Setsuro Ebashi

Myosin light-chain kinase (MLCK) of smooth muscle consists of an actin-binding domain at the N-terminal, the catalytic domain in the central portion, and the myosin-binding domain at the C-terminal. The kinase activity is mediated by the catalytic domain that phosphorylates the myosin light-chain of 20 kDa (MLC20), activating smooth muscle myosin to interact with actin. Although the regulatory role of the kinase activity is well established, the role of non-kinase activity derived from actin-binding and myosin-binding domains remains unknown. This review is dedicated to Dr. Setsuro Ebashi, who devoted himself to elucidating the non-kinase activity of MLCK after establishing calcium regulation through troponin in skeletal and cardiac muscles. He proposed that the actin-myosin interaction of smooth muscle could be activated by the non-kinase activity of MLCK, a mechanism that is quite independent of MLC20 phosphorylation. The authors will extend his proposal for the role of non-kinase activity. In this review, we express MLCK and its fragments as recombinant proteins to examine their effects on the actin-myosin interaction in vitro. We also down-regulate MLCK in the cultured smooth muscle cells, and propose that MLC20 phosphorylation is not obligatory for the smooth muscle to contract.     

Mutation analysis of the non-muscle myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) deletion constructs on CV1 fibroblast contractile activity and proliferation

Smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) is a multifunctional molecule composed of an N-terminal actin binding domain, a central kinase domain, and C-terminal calmodulin- and myosin-binding domains. We previously cloned and characterized a novel MLCK isoform from endothelial cells (EC MLCK) consisting of 1,914 amino acids displaying a higher molecular weight (210 kDa) and a novel-amino-terminal stretch of 922 amino acids not shared by the smooth muscle isoform (smMLCK, 150 kDa). To further define the role of specific EC MLCK motifs in endothelial and non-muscle cells, we constructed two epitope-tagged EC MLCK deletion mutants in mammalian expression vectors lacking either the C-terminal auto-inhibitory and calmodulin-binding domain (EC MLCK1745) or the ATP-binding site (EC MLCKATPdel). Expression of EC MLCK1745 in CV1 fibroblasts showed increased basal actin stress fiber formation, which was markedly enhanced after tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) or thrombin treatment. Distribution of EC MLCK1745 was largely confined to stress fibers, cortical actin filaments, and focal adhesion contacts, and co-localized with myosin light chains (MLCs) diphosphorylated on Ser(19) and Thr(18). In contrast, immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that EC MLCKATPdel abolished thrombin- and TNFalpha-induced stress fiber formation and MLC phosphorylation, suggesting this kinase-dead mutant functions as a dominant-negative MLCK construct, thereby confirming the role of EC MLCK in stress fiber formation. Finally, we compared the serum-stimulated growth rate of mutant MLCK-transfected fibroblasts to sham controls, and found EC MLCK1745 to augment thymidine incorporation whereas EC MLCKATPdel reduced CV1 growth rates. These data demonstrate the necessary role for MLCK in driving the contractile apparatus via MLC phosphorylation, which can alter fibroblast growth and contractility.     

In vitro movement of actin filaments on gizzard smooth muscle myosin: requirement of phosphorylation of myosin light chain and effects of tropomyosin and caldesmon

ATP-dependent movement of actin filaments on smooth muscle myosin was investigated by using the in vitro motility assay method in which myosin was fixed on the surface of a coverslip in a phosphorylated or an unphosphorylated state. Actin filaments slid on gizzard myosin phosphorylated with myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) at a rate of 0.35 micron/s, but did not slide at all on unphosphorylated myosin. The movement of actin filaments on phosphorylated myosin was stopped by perfusion of phosphatase. Subsequent perfusion with a solution containing MLCK, calmodulin, and Ca2+ enabled actin filaments to move again. The sliding velocities on monophosphorylated and diphosphorylated myosin by MLCK were not different. Actin filaments did not move on myosin phosphorylated with protein kinase C (PKC). The sliding velocity on myosin phosphorylated with both MLCK and PKC was identical to that on myosin phosphorylated only with MLCK. Gizzard tropomyosin enhanced the sliding velocity to 0.76 micron/s. Gizzard caldesmon decreased the sliding velocity with increase in its concentration. At a 5-fold molar ratio of caldesmon to actin, the movement stopped completely. This inhibitory effect of caldesmon was relieved upon addition of excess calmodulin and Ca2+.     

Differences in phorbol-dependent phosphorylation of regulatory proteins and contraction of phasic and tonic smooth muscle

Smooth muscles are divided into slowly contracting tonic and relatively fast phasic muscles. In both cases Ca2+ is a key mediator of the contractile response. However, the appearance of a tonic component during sphincter or arterial muscle contraction and its absence in contracting visceral smooth muscle is characteristic of their difference. We have found that in chicken tissues phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (PDBu) induces a sustained contraction in carotid arterial muscle, but provokes no contraction in phasic gizzard smooth muscle. Next we were aimed to find differences in PDBu-induced phosphorylation of the key proteins involved in regulation of smooth muscle contraction, i.e. caldesmon, myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), and the myosin light chain kinase-related protein (KRP, also known as telokin). Two correlative differences were observed. 1. PDBu stimulated phosphorylation of MLCK in tonic smooth muscle and had no effect on the level of MLCK phosphorylation in phasic muscle. Phosphopeptide mapping suggests the involvement of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases in phosphorylation of MLCK in situ. 2. PDBu induced phosphorylation of MAP-kinase sites in caldesmon in both types of smooth muscle, but this phosphorylation had no significant effect on caldesmon functional activity in vitro. For the first time we have shown that in gizzard PDBu also stimulates a yet unknown transitory caldesmon-kinase different from protein kinase, C, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II and casein kinase CK2. 3. No significant difference was found in the kinetics of PDBu-dependent phosphorylation of KRP in tonic and phasic smooth muscles. KRP was also demonstrated to be a major phosphoprotein in smooth muscle phosphorylated in vivo at several sites located within its N-terminal sequence. Protein kinases able to phosphorylate these sites were identified in vitro. Among them, MAP-kinase was suggested to phosphorylate a serine residue homologous to that phosphorylated in MLCK. 4. p42erk2 and p38 MAP-kinases were found in phasic and tonic smooth muscles. Both were responsive to PDBu in cultured chicken aortic smooth muscle cells, and their role in phosphorylation of MLCK and low molecular weight isoform of caldesmon was evaluated.     

A novel regulatory effect of myosin light chain kinase from smooth muscle on the ATP-dependent interaction between actin and myosin.

The actin-binding activity of myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) from smooth muscle was studied with special reference to the ATP-dependent interaction between actin and myosin. MLCK in the presence of calmodulin endowed sensitivity to Ca2+ on the movement of actin filaments on phosphorylated myosin from smooth muscle that was fixed on a coverslip. This regulatory effect was not attributable to the kinase activity of MLCK but could be explained by its actin-binding activity. The importance of the actin-binding activity was further substantiated by results of an experiment with Nitellopsis actin-cables in which MLCK regulated the interaction under conditions where MLCK was exclusively associated with the actin-cables.