Ndj1, a telomere-associated protein,regulates centrosome separation in budding yeast meiosis

Yeast centrosomes (called spindle pole bodies [SPBs]) remain cohesive for hours during meiotic G2 when recombination takes place. In contrast, SPBs separate within minutes after duplication in vegetative cells. We report here that Ndj1, a previously known meiosis-specific telomere-associated protein, is required for protecting SPB cohesion. Ndj1 localizes to the SPB but dissociates from it ∼16 min before SPB separation. Without Ndj1, meiotic SPBs lost cohesion prematurely, whereas overproduction of Ndj1 delayed SPB separation. When produced ectopically in vegetative cells, Ndj1 caused SPB separation defects and cell lethality. Localization of Ndj1 to the SPB depended on the SUN domain protein Mps3, and removal of the N terminus of Mps3 allowed SPB separation and suppressed the lethality of NDJ1-expressing vegetative cells. Finally, we show that Ndj1 forms oligomeric complexes with Mps3, and that the Polo-like kinase Cdc5 regulates Ndj1 protein stability and SPB separation. These findings reveal the underlying mechanism that coordinates yeast centrosome dynamics with meiotic telomere movement and cell cycle progression.     

Csm4, in collaboration with Ndj1, mediates telomere-led chromosome dynamics and recombination during yeast meiosis

Chromosome movements are a general feature of mid-prophase of meiosis. In budding yeast, meiotic chromosomes exhibit dynamic movements, led by nuclear envelope (NE)-associated telomeres, throughout the zygotene and pachytene stages. Zygotene motion underlies the global tendency for colocalization of NE-associated chromosome ends in a “bouquet.” In this study, we identify Csm4 as a new molecular participant in these processes and show that, unlike the two previously identified components, Ndj1 and Mps3, Csm4 is not required for meiosis-specific telomere/NE association. Instead, it acts to couple telomere/NE ensembles to a force generation mechanism. Mutants lacking Csm4 and/or Ndj1 display the following closely related phenotypes: (i) elevated crossover (CO) frequencies and decreased CO interference without abrogation of normal pathways; (ii) delayed progression of recombination, and recombination-coupled chromosome morphogenesis, with resulting delays in the MI division; and (iii) nondisjunction of homologs at the MI division for some reason other than absence of (the obligatory) CO(s). The recombination effects are discussed in the context of a model where the underlying defect is chromosome movement, the absence of which results in persistence of inappropriate chromosome relationships that, in turn, results in the observed mutant phenotypes.     

Meiotic telomere protein Ndj1p is required for meiosis-specific telomere distribution, bouquet formation and efficient homologue pairing

We have investigated the requirements for NDJ1 in meiotic telomere redistribution and clustering in synchronized cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. On induction of wild-type meiosis, telomeres disperse from premeiotic aggregates over the nuclear periphery, and then cluster near the spindle pole body (bouquet arrangement) before dispersing again. In ndj1Delta meiocytes, telomeres are scattered throughout the nucleus and fail to form perinuclear meiosis-specific distribution patterns, suggesting that Ndj1p may function to tether meiotic telomeres to the nuclear periphery. Since ndj1Delta meiocytes fail to cluster their telomeres at any prophase stage, Ndj1p is the first protein shown to be required for bouquet formation in a synaptic organism. Analysis of homologue pairing by two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization with cosmid probes to regions on III, IX, and XI revealed that disruption of bouquet formation is associated with a significant delay (>2 h) of homologue pairing. An increased and persistent fraction of ndj1Delta meiocytes with Zip1p polycomplexes suggests that chromosome polarization is important for synapsis progression. Thus, our observations support the hypothesis that meiotic telomere clustering contributes to efficient homologue alignment and synaptic pairing. Under naturally occurring conditions, bouquet formation may allow for rapid sporulation and confer a selective advantage.     

Ndj1, a telomere-associated protein, promotes meiotic recombination in budding yeast

Dynamic telomere repositioning is a prominent feature of meiosis. Deletion of a telomere-associated protein, Ndj1, results in the failure of both attachment and clustering of telomeres at the nuclear envelope and delays several landmarks of meiosis I, such as pairing, synaptonemal complex formation, and timing of the meiosis I division. We explored the role of Ndj1 in meiotic recombination, which occurs through the formation and repair of programmed double-strand breaks. The ndj1delta mutation allows for the formation of the first detectable strand invasion intermediate (i.e., single-end invasion) with wild-type kinetics; however, it confers a delay in the formation of the double-Holliday junction intermediate and both crossover and noncrossover products. These results challenge the widely held notion that clustering of telomeres in meiosis promotes the ability of homologous chromosomes to find one another in budding Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We propose that an Ndj1-dependent function is critical for stabilizing analogous strand invasion intermediates that exist in two separate branches of the bifurcated pathway, leading to either noncrossover or crossover formation. These findings provide a link between telomere dynamics and a distinct mechanistic step of meiotic recombination that follows the homology search.     

Rap1-independent telomere attachment and bouquet formation in mammalian meiosis

Attachment of telomeres to the nuclear envelope (NE) and their clustering in a chromosomal bouquet during meiotic prophase I is an evolutionary conserved event that promotes chromosome pairing and recombination. In fission yeast, bouquet formation fails when the telomeric protein Rap1 is absent or when the telomeric protein Taz1 fails to recruit Rap1 to telomeres. The mammalian Rap1 orthologue is a component of the shelterin complex and localises to telomeres through an interaction with a Taz1-like telomeric DNA binding factor, TRF2. Here, we investigated the role of mammalian Rap1 in meiotic telomere attachment and clustering by analysing spermatogenesis in Rap1-deficient mice. The results establish that the meiotic three-dimensional nuclear architecture and recombination are not affected by the absence of Rap1. Furthermore, Rap1-deficient meiotic telomeres assemble the SUN1 nuclear membrane protein, attach to the NE, and undergo bouquet formation indistinguishable from the wild-type setting. Thus, the role of Rap1 in meiosis is not conserved between fission yeast and mammals, suggesting that mammals have alternative modes for connecting telomeres to SUN proteins on the meiotic nuclear envelope.     

Role for telomere cap structure in meiosis

Telomeres, the natural ends of eukaryotic chromosomes, are essential for the protection of chromosomes from end-to-end fusions, recombination, and shortening. Here we explore their role in the process of meiotic division in the budding yeast, Kluyveromyces lactis. Telomerase RNA mutants that cause unusually long telomeres with deregulated structure led to severely defective meiosis. The severity of the meiotic phenotype of two mutants correlated with the degree of loss of binding of the telomere binding protein Rap1p. We show that telomere size and the extent of potential Rap1p binding to the entire telomere are irrelevant to the process of meiosis. Moreover, we demonstrate that extreme difference in telomere size between two homologous chromosomes is compatible with the normal function of telomeres during meiosis. In contrast, the structure of the most terminal telomeric repeats is critical for normal meiosis. Our results demonstrate that telomeres play a critical role during meiotic division and that their terminal cap structure is essential for this role.     

Induction of meiosis in yeast

Summary Meiosis is induced in yeast by a sequence of events starting with the disappearance of glucose from the growth medium. Preparation for meiosis during the period of the premeiotic mitoses involves: (1) Development of the ability to metabolize acetate; and (2) establishment and maintenance of sufficiently high concentrations of RNA and protein in the cell to support an extensive biosynthetic activity. A new regulation model is proposed on the basis of the results obtained.     

Selected aspects of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance and resetting in plants

Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance (TEI), which is the inheritance of expression states and thus traits that are not determined by the DNA sequence, is often postulated but the molecular mechanisms involved are only rarely verified. This especially applies to the heritability of environmentally induced traits, which have gained interest over the last years. Here we will discuss selected examples of epigenetic inheritance in plants and artificially divide them according to the occurrence of inter-generational resetting. The decision which epigenetic marks are reset and which ones are not is crucial for the understanding of TEI. We will consider examples of epialleles found in natural populations and epialleles induced by genetic and/or environmental factors used in experimental setups.     

Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis

Crossovers produced by homologous recombination promote accurate chromosome segregation in meiosis and are controlled such that at least one forms per chromosome pair and multiple crossovers are widely spaced. Recombination initiates with an excess number of double-strand breaks made by Spo11 protein. Thus, crossover control involves a decision by which some breaks give crossovers while others follow a predominantly noncrossover pathway(s). To understand this decision, we examined recombination when breaks are reduced in yeast spo11 hypomorphs. We find that crossover levels tend to be maintained at the expense of noncrossovers and that genomic loci differ in expression of this "crossover homeostasis." These findings define a previously unsuspected manifestation of crossover control, i.e., that the crossover/noncrossover ratio can change to maintain crossovers. Our results distinguish between existing models of crossover control and support the hypothesis that an obligate crossover is a genetically programmed event tied to crossover interference.     

Pus1p-dependent tRNA pseudouridinylation becomes essential when tRNA biogenesis is compromised in yeast

Yeast Pus1p catalyzes the formation of pseudouridine (psi) at specific sites of several tRNAs, but its function is not essential for cell viability. We show here that Pus1p becomes essential when another tRNA:pseudouridine synthase, Pus4p, or the essential minor tRNA for glutamine are mutated. Strikingly, this mutant tRNA, which carries a mismatch in the T psi C arm, displays a nuclear export defect. Furthermore, nuclear export of at least one wild-type tRNA species becomes defective in the absence of Pus1p. Our data, thus, show that the modifications formed by Pus1p are essential when other aspects of tRNA biogenesis or function are compromised and suggest that impairment of nuclear tRNA export in the absence of Pus1p might contribute to this phenotype.     

Mhr1p-dependent concatemeric mitochondrial DNA formation for generating yeast mitochondrial homoplasmic cells

Mitochondria carry many copies of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), but mt-alleles quickly segregate during mitotic growth through unknown mechanisms. Consequently, all mtDNA copies are often genetically homogeneous within each individual ("homoplasmic"). Our previous study suggested that tandem multimers ("concatemers") formed mainly by the Mhr1p (a yeast nuclear gene-encoded mtDNA-recombination protein)-dependent pathway are required for mtDNA partitioning into buds with concomitant monomerization. The transmission of a few randomly selected clones (as concatemers) of mtDNA into buds is a possible mechanism to establish homoplasmy. The current study provides evidence for this hypothesis as follows: the overexpression of MHR1 accelerates mt-allele-segregation in growing heteroplasmic zygotes, and mhr1-1 (recombination-deficient) causes its delay. The mt-allele-segregation rate correlates with the abundance of concatemers, which depends on Mhr1p. In G1-arrested cells, concatemeric mtDNA was labeled by [14C]thymidine at a much higher density than monomers, indicating concatemers as the immediate products of mtDNA replication, most likely in a rolling circle mode. After releasing the G1 arrest in the absence of [14C]thymidine, the monomers as the major species in growing buds of dividing cells bear a similar density of 14C as the concatemers in the mother cells, indicating that the concatemers in mother cells are the precursors of the monomers in buds.     

NEJ1 prevents NHEJ-dependent telomere fusions in yeast without telomerase

In a search for genes involved in cell-type-dependent chromosome instability, we have found a role for NEJ1, a regulator of nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), in cells that survive in the absence of telomerase. In yeast, NHEJ is regulated by mating-type status through NEJ1, which is repressed in a/alpha cells. For efficient NHEJ, NEJ1 is required as part of a complex with LIF1 and DNL4, which catalyzes DNA ligation. In haploid cells without telomerase, we find that the absence of NEJ1 results in high frequencies of circular chromosomes in type II survivors (i.e., those typified by lengthened telomere repeat tracts). These telomere fusion events are DNL4 dependent. NEJ1 therefore has a role in protecting telomeres from end fusions by NHEJ in the absence of telomerase that contrasts with its role in promoting repair at sites of DNA double-strand breaks.     

Cargo sequences are important for Som1p-dependent signal peptide cleavage in yeast mitochondria

The inner membrane protease (IMP) has two catalytic subunits, Imp1p and Imp2p, that exhibit nonoverlapping substrate specificity in mitochondria of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The IMP also has at least one noncatalytic subunit, Som1p, which is required to cleave signal peptides from a subset of Imp1p substrates. To understand how Som1p mediates Imp1p substrate specificity, we addressed the possibility that Som1p functions as a molecular chaperone, which binds to specific substrates and directs them to the catalytic site. Our results show that cargo sequences attached to the signal peptide are important for Som1p-dependent presequence cleavage; however, no specific cargo sequence is required. Indeed, we show that a substrate normally destined for Imp2p is cleaved in a Som1p-dependent manner when the substrate is directed to Imp1p. These results argue against the notion that Som1p is a molecular chaperone. Instead, we propose that the cargo of some Imp1p substrates can assume a conformation incompatible with presequence cleavage. Som1p could thus act through Imp1p to improve cleavage efficiency early during substrate maturation.     

Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in yeast

The genes required for meiosis and sporulation in yeast are expressed at specific points in a highly regulated temporal pathway. Recent experiments using DNA microarrays to examine gene expression during meiosis and the identification of many regulatory factors have provided important advances in our understanding of how genes are regulated at the different stages of meiosis.