Acute exposure to 2G phase shifts the rat circadian timing system

The circadian timing system (CTS) provides internal and external temporal coordination of an animal's physiology and behavior. In mammals, the generation and coordination of these circadian rhythms is controlled by a neural pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), located within the hypothalamus. The pacemaker is synchronized to the 24 hour day by time cues (zeitgebers) such as the light/dark cycle. When an animal is exposed to an environment without time cues, the circadian rhythms maintain internal temporal coordination but exhibit a "free-running" condition in which the period length is determined by the internal pacemaker. Maintenance of internal and external temporal coordination are critical for normal physiological and psychological function in human and non-human primates. Exposure to altered gravitational environments has been shown to affect the amplitude, mean, and timing of circadian rhythms in species ranging from unicellular organisms to man. However, it has not been determined whether altered gravitational fields have a direct effect on the neural pacemaker, or affect peripheral physiological systems that express these circadian parameters. In previous studies, the ability of a stimulus to phase shift circadian rhythms was used to determine whether a stimulus has a direct effect on the neural pacemaker. The present experiment was performed in order to determine whether acute exposure to a hyperdynamic field could phase shift circadian rhythms.     

PDFR and CRY signaling converge in a subset of clock neurons to modulate the amplitude and phase of circadian behavior in Drosophila

Background

To synchronize their molecular rhythms, circadian pacemaker neurons must input both external and internal timing cues and, therefore, signal integration between sensory information and internal clock status is fundamental to normal circadian physiology.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We demonstrate the specific convergence of clock-derived neuropeptide signaling with that of a deep brain photoreceptor. We report that the neuropeptide PDF receptor and the circadian photoreceptor CRYPTOCROME (CRY) are precisely co-expressed in a subset of pacemakers, and that these pathways together provide a requisite drive for circadian control of daily locomotor rhythms. These convergent signaling pathways influence the phase of rhythm generation, but also its amplitude. In the absence of both pathways, PER rhythms were greatly reduced in only those specific pacemakers that receive convergent inputs and PER levels remained high in the nucleus throughout the day. This suggested a large-scale dis-regulation of the pacemaking machinery. Behavioral rhythms were likewise disrupted: in light∶dark conditions they were aberrant, and under constant dark conditions, they were lost.

Conclusions/Significance

We speculate that the convergence of environmental and clock-derived signals may produce a coincident detection of light, synergistic responses to it, and thus more accurate and more efficient re-setting properties.     

Different circadian pacemakers control feeding and locomotor activity rhythms in European starlings

Summary In higher organisms, many physiological and behavioral functions exhibit daily variations, generated by endogenous circadian oscillators. It is not yet clear whether all the various rhythms that occur within an individual depend on one and the same pacemaker or whether different pacemakers are involved. To examine this question, the feeding and perch-hopping rhythms were measured in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) under light-dark cycles and continuous dim light. In dim light, the internal phase relationship between the feeding and perch-hopping rhythms changed systematically as a function of the circadian period, and the two rhythms could even dissociate and show different circadian periods in individuals with extremely long or extremely short circadian periods. Moreover, in some birds kept on lowamplitude light-dark cycles, the rhythm of feeding was synchronized 180° out of phase with the rhythm of locomotor activity. These results strongly suggest that in the European starling the feeding and locomotor activity rhythms are controlled by separate circadian pacemakers.     

Isolation of an insect circadian clock

Summary Under constant conditions the compound eyes of the ground beetleAnthia sexguttata exhibit sensitivity changes in a very clear circadian rhythm. Usually the rhythms in both eyes in constant darkness are mutually coupled. After transection of the optic tract between the lobula and the supraesophageal ganglion the circadian rhythms of the two eyes continue without interruption, but coupling between them is abolished. Even if the entire supraesophageal ganglion is removed, leaving the optic ganglia intact, the circadian rhythms in the eyes continue without interruption independently. But the rhythm is abolished if the region of the lobula is damaged.The experiments show thatAnthia has circadian pacemakers in the left and right optic ganglia in or close to the lobula. These pacemakers can function independently from the rest of the brain and control circadian rhythms of physiological events.Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Sonderforschungsbereich 45 Vergleichende Neurobiologie des Verhaltens E1     

The times they’re a-changing: Effects of circadian desynchronization on physiology and disease

Circadian rhythms are endogenous and need to be continuously entrained (synchronized) with the environment. Entrainment includes both coupling internal oscillators to external periodic changes as well as synchrony between the central clock and peripheral oscillators, which have been shown to exhibit different phases and resynchronization speed. Temporal desynchronization induces diverse physiological alterations that ultimately decrease quality of life and induces pathological situations. Indeed, there is a considerable amount of evidence regarding the deleterious effect of circadian dysfunction on overall health or on disease onset and progression, both in human studies and in animal models. In this review we discuss the general features of circadian entrainment and introduce diverse experimental models of desynchronization. In addition, we focus on metabolic, immune and cognitive alterations under situations of acute or chronic circadian desynchronization, as exemplified by jet-lag and shiftwork schedules. Moreover, such situations might lead to an enhanced susceptibility to diverse cancer types. Possible interventions (including light exposure, scheduled timing for meals and use of chronobiotics) are also discussed.     

Circadian ovulatory rhythms in Japanese quail: role of ocular and extraocular pacemakers

Previous studies have shown that the circadian system of Japanese quail is composed of multiple photic inputs and multiple oscillators. Among these are extraretinal photoreceptors that mediate both circadian and photoperiodic responses and circadian pacemakers in the eyes that, via neural and hormonal outputs, help to maintain rhythmicity of central circadian clocks (presumably located in the suprachiasmatic area of the hypothalamus). Furthermore, a component of the central circadian system is influenced by reproductive hormones. Under certain conditions, the circadian system of female quail can be induced to split into two circadian components: one driven by ocular pacemakers and one driven by feedback from reproductive hormones. Importantly, ovulation is either inhibited or permitted as these two oscillators (or sets of oscillators) constantly change internal phase relationships with each other, suggesting an "internal coincidence" mechanism in the control of ovulation. The oviposition patterns of quail in light-dark (LD) cycles also support an internal coincidence mechanism. The authors tested the hypothesis that the ocular pacemakers are an important component of an internal coincidence mechanism controlling ovulation by examinig the effects of blinding by complete eye removal (EX), and the effects of eye-patching, on the body temperature and oviposition patterns of quail exposed to 24-h LD cycles. They also examined the effects of EX on quail exposed to continuous light (LL) and to continuous darkness (DD). Neither EX nor eye-patching affected the oviposition patterns of birds in LD. Furthermore, robust body temperature and oviposition rhythms continued in EX birds in LL, but body temperature became arrhythmic in DD with the cessation of ovulation. The results do not show a role for ocular pacemakers in the control of ovulation, but they do support the hypotheses that (1) entrainment of the central oscillators by extraretinally perceived light is sufficient to preserve a normal ovulatory pattern in LD in the absence of the ocular pacemakers, and (2) in LL, feedback of reproductive hormones onto the central oscillators is sufficient to organize the circadian system even in the absence of the ocular pacemakers. Whether or not the ocular pacemakers are normally involved in the control of ovulation is still an open question.     

The colony environment, but not direct contact with conspecifics, influences the development of circadian rhythms in honey bees

Honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers emerge from the pupae with no circadian rhythms in behavior or brain clock gene expression but show strong rhythms later in life. This postembryonic development of circadian rhythms is reminiscent of that of infants of humans and other primates but contrasts with most insects, which typically emerge from the pupae with strong circadian rhythms. Very little is known about the internal and external factors regulating the ontogeny of circadian rhythms in bees or in other animals. We tested the hypothesis that the environment during early life influences the later expression of circadian rhythms in locomotor activity in young honey bees. We reared newly emerged bees in various social environments, transferred them to individual cages in constant laboratory conditions, and monitored their locomotor activity. We found that the percentage of rhythmic individuals among bees that experienced the colony environment for their first 48 h of adult life was similar to that of older sister foragers, but their rhythms were weaker. Sister bees isolated individually in the laboratory for the same period were significantly less likely to show circadian rhythms in locomotor activity. Bees experiencing the colony environment for only 24 h, or staying for 48 h with 30 same-age sister bees in the laboratory, were similar to bees individually isolated in the laboratory. By contrast, bees that were caged individually or in groups in single- or double-mesh enclosures inside a field colony were as likely to exhibit circadian rhythms as their sisters that were freely moving in the same colony. These findings suggest that the development of the circadian system in young adult honey bees is faster in the colony than in isolation. Direct contact with the queen, workers, or the brood, contact pheromones, and trophallaxis, which are all important means of communication in honey bees, cannot account for the influence of the colony environment, since they were all withheld from the bees in the double-mesh enclosures. Our results suggest that volatile pheromones, the colony microenvironment, or both influence the ontogeny of circadian rhythms in honey bees.     

Age-dependent changes of the circadian system

This review summarizes the current knowledge on changes of the circadian system in advanced age, mainly for rodents. The first part is dedicated to changes of the overt rhythms. Possible causes are discussed, as are methods to treat the disturbances. In aging animals and humans, all rhythm characters change. The most prominent changes are the decrease of the amplitude and the diminished ability to synchronize with a periodic environment. The susceptibility to photic and nonphotic cues is decreased. As a consequence, both internal and external temporal order are disturbed under steady-state conditions and, even more, following changes in the periodic environment. Due to the high complexity of the circadian system, which includes oscillator(s), mechanisms of external synchronization and of internal coupling, the changes may arise for several reasons. Many of the changes seem to occur within the SCN itself. The number of functioning neurons decreases with advancing age and, probably, so does the coupling between them. As a result, the SCN is unable, or at least less able, to produce stable rhythms and to transmit timing information to target sites. Initially, only the ability to synchronize with the periodic environment is diminished, whereas the rhythms themselves continue to be well pronounced. Therefore, the possibility exists to treat age-dependent disturbances. This can be done pharmacologically or by increasing the zeitgeber strength. So, some of the rhythm disturbances can be reversed, increasing the magnitude of the light-dark (LD) zeitgeber. Another possibility is to strengthen feedback effects, for example, by increasing the daily amount of activity. By this means, the stability and synchronization of the circadian activity rhythm of old mice and men were improved. (Chronobiology International,17(3), 261-283, 2000)     

Modulation of circadian clocks by nutrients and food factors

Daily activity rhythms that are dominated by internal clocks are called circadian rhythms. A central clock is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, and peripheral clocks are located in most mammalian peripheral cells. The central clock is entrained by light/dark cycles, whereas peripheral clocks are entrained by feeding cycles. The effects of nutrients on the central and peripheral clocks have been investigated during the past decade and much interaction between them has come to light. For example, a high-fat diet prolongs the period of circadian behavior, a ketogenic diet advances the onset of locomotor activity rhythms, and a high-salt diet advances the phase of peripheral molecular clocks. Moreover, some food factors such as caffeine, nobiletin, and resveratrol, alter molecular and/or behavioral circadian rhythms. Here, we review nutrients and food factors that modulate mammalian circadian clocks from the cellular to the behavioral level.     

生物节律影响巨核细胞发育和血小板产生的研究进展

自然界中生物体的生命活动、生活习性都存在着一定的周期性变化。生物昼夜节律的产生是以内源性的生物钟系统为基础的。生物钟不仅易受到外界环境的影响,而且可以通过调控一系列特定的下游基因的表达,影响生物体的生理生化过程。巨核细胞是生成血小板的前体细胞,经过分化、增殖、成熟和裂解,最终生成血小板。血小板是一种没有细胞核的特殊细胞,在生理性止血和器官修复上发挥着重要作用,同时参与血栓等多种疾病的发生。近几年借助现代分子生物学和细胞生物学手段,证实了哺乳动物的巨核细胞和血小板的生成呈现明显的周期性的变化,利用生物钟基因缺失模型进一步发现了生物钟基因对巨核细胞和血小板的影响。本文概述了生物节律对巨核细胞和血小板的影响,为进一步研究巨核细胞的发育和血小板生成机制提供了参考。     

Photic and nonphotic inputs to the diurnal circadian clock

Diurnal animals occupy a different temporal niche from nocturnal animals and are consequently exposed to different amounts of light as well as different dangers. Accordingly, some variation exists in the way that diurnal animals synchronize their internal circadian clock to match the external 24-hour daily cycle. First, though the brain mechanisms underlying photic entrainment are very similar among species with different daily activity patterns, there is evidence that diurnal animals are less sensitive to photic stimuli compared to nocturnal animals. Second, stimuli other than light that synchronize rhythms (i.e. nonphotic stimuli) can also entrain and phase shift daily rhythms. Some of the rules that govern nonphotic entrainment in nocturnal animals as well as the brain mechanisms that control nonphotic influences on rhythms do not appear to apply to diurnal animals, however. Some evidence supports the idea that arousal or activity plays an important role in entraining rhythms in diurnal animals, either during the light (active) or dark (inactive) phases, though no consistent pattern is seen. GABAergic stimulation induces phase shifts during the subjective day in both diurnal and nocturnal animals. In diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus (Nile grass rats), SCN GABA_A receptor activation at this time results in phase delays while in nocturnal animals phase advances are induced. It appears that the effect of GABA at this circadian phase results from the inhibition of period gene expression in both diurnal and nocturnal animals. Nonetheless, the resulting phase shifts are in opposite directions. It is not known what stimuli or behaviours ultimately induce changes in GABA activity in the SCN that result in alterations of circadian phase in diurnal grass rats. Taken together, studies such as these suggest that it may be problematic to apply the principles governing nocturnal nonphotic entrainment and its underlying mechanisms to diurnal species including humans.     

The Circadian System of Crustaceans

Crustaceans exhibit a variety of overt circadian rhythms. Observations on intact animals suggest the existence of more than one circadian pacemaker in the nervous system. Ablation experiments so far have been inconclusive in pinpointing the location of putative pacemakers. However, various structures, most notably the optic peduncle, have been shown to sustain circadian rhythmicity in vitro. Retinal sensitivity and neurosecretory activity display circadian rhythms in the isolated optic peduncle, but they are also responsive to synchronizing influences from other regions of the central nervous system, most notably the supra-esophageal ganglion. A model based on a number of circadian pacemakers distributed in the central nervous system best fits the experimental results at present. Coupling of rhythmicity between independent circadian pacemakers is likely to occur, and a neuroendocrine stage of integration has been proposed for several rhythms. Various entraining agents have been identified, and more than one may play a part in the synchronization of a given rhythm.     

Modeling the emergence of circadian rhythms in a clock neuron network

Circadian rhythms in pacemaker cells persist for weeks in constant darkness, while in other types of cells the molecular oscillations that underlie circadian rhythms damp rapidly under the same conditions. Although much progress has been made in understanding the biochemical and cellular basis of circadian rhythms, the mechanisms leading to damped or self-sustained oscillations remain largely unknown. There exist many mathematical models that reproduce the circadian rhythms in the case of a single cell of the Drosophila fly. However, not much is known about the mechanisms leading to coherent circadian oscillation in clock neuron networks. In this work we have implemented a model for a network of interacting clock neurons to describe the emergence (or damping) of circadian rhythms in Drosophila fly, in the absence of zeitgebers. Our model consists of an array of pacemakers that interact through the modulation of some parameters by a network feedback. The individual pacemakers are described by a well-known biochemical model for circadian oscillation, to which we have added degradation of PER protein by light and multiplicative noise. The network feedback is the PER protein level averaged over the whole network. In particular, we have investigated the effect of modulation of the parameters associated with (i) the control of net entrance of PER into the nucleus and (ii) the non-photic degradation of PER. Our results indicate that the modulation of PER entrance into the nucleus allows the synchronization of clock neurons, leading to coherent circadian oscillations under constant dark condition. On the other hand, the modulation of non-photic degradation cannot reset the phases of individual clocks subjected to intrinsic biochemical noise.     

Integration of human sleep-wake regulation and circadian rhythmicity.

The human sleep-wake cycle is generated by a circadian process, originating from the suprachiasmatic nuclei, in interaction with a separate oscillatory process: the sleep homeostat. The sleep-wake cycle is normally timed to occur at a specific phase relative to the external cycle of light-dark exposure. It is also timed at a specific phase relative to internal circadian rhythms, such as the pineal melatonin rhythm, the circadian sleep-wake propensity rhythm, and the rhythm of responsiveness of the circadian pacemaker to light. Variations in these internal and external phase relationships, such as those that occur in blindness, aging, morning and evening, and advanced and delayed sleep-phase syndrome, lead to sleep disruptions and complaints. Changes in ocular circadian photoreception, interindividual variation in the near-24-h intrinsic period of the circadian pacemaker, and sleep homeostasis can contribute to variations in external and internal phase. Recent findings on the physiological and molecular-genetic correlates of circadian sleep disorders suggest that the timing of the sleep-wake cycle and circadian rhythms is closely integrated but is, in part, regulated differentially.     

A Plastic Clock: How Circadian Rhythms Respond to Environmental Cues in Drosophila

Circadian clocks synchronize the physiology and behavior of most animals with the day to night cycle. A fundamental property of the molecular pacemakers generating circadian rhythms is their self-sustained nature: they keep oscillating even under constant conditions, with a period close to, but not exactly, 24 h. However, circadian pacemakers have to be sensitive to environmental cues to be beneficial. They need to be reset every day to keep a proper phase relationship with the day to night cycle, and they have to be able to adjust to seasonal changes in day length and temperature. Here, we review our current knowledge of the molecular and neural mechanisms contributing to the plasticity of Drosophila circadian rhythms, which are proving to be remarkably sophisticated and complex.     

Oscillators entrained by food and the emergence of anticipatory timing behaviors

Circadian rhythms are adjusted to the external environment by the light-dark cycle via the suprachiasmatic nucleus, and to the internal environment of the body by multiple cues that derive from feeding/fasting. These cues determine the timing of sleep/wake cycles and all the activities associated with these states. We suggest that numerous sources of temporal information, including hormonal cues such as corticoids, insulin, and ghrelin, as well as conditioned learned responses determined by the temporal relationships between photic and feeding/fasting signals, can determine the timing of regularly recurring circadian responses. We further propose that these temporal signals can act additively to modulate the pattern of daily activity. Based on such reasoning, we describe the rationale and methodology for separating the influences of these diverse sources of temporal information. The evidence indicates that there are individual differences in sensitivity to internal and external signals that vary over circadian time, time since the previous meal, time until the next meal, or with duration of food deprivation. All of these cues are integrated in sites and circuits modulating physiology and behavior. Individuals detect changes in internal and external signals, interpret those changes as "hunger," and adjust their physiological responses and activity levels accordingly.     

Inconsistency in the expression of locomotor and ERG circadian rhythms in the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.).

ERG recordings from German cockroaches showed that the amplitude of light-evoked responses have a circadian rhythmicity in adult males that coincided with the locomotor circadian rhythm. The peak of the response occurred during the subjective night, and the circadian period was less than 24 h under DD condition. In contrast, although the locomotor circadian rhythm was masked by the development of ovaries and pregnancy in females, their visual responses displayed circadian rhythmicity. This inconsistency in expression of locomotor and visual sensitivity circadian rhythms in females implied separate pacemakers for these two overt rhythms. After severing the optic nerves, changes in ERG amplitude of the operated cockroaches still displayed a circadian rhythm under DD condition, demonstrating that the visual sensitive pacemaker was located in the eye and independent from the locomotor pacemaker.