植物MAPK信号转导组分的细胞定位与选择性剪接

促分裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)级联途径在真核生物中是高度保守的,由MAPKs,MAPKKs,MAPKKKs组成,通过MAPKKK→MAPKK→MAPK逐级磷酸化传递细胞信号.已有大量研究表明,MAPK在植物响应生物与非生物胁迫,以及植物激素和细胞周期的信号转导中起重要作用.在植物响应各种逆境过程中激活的MAPK基因,细胞内的定位发生动态变化.选择性剪接是真核生物中调节基因表达的重要模式,能够影响蛋白的结合特性、胞内定位、酶的活性、蛋白的稳定性和翻译后的修饰.MAPK基因的选择性剪接能产生不同的转录异型并具有不同的亚细胞定位.本文综述这方面的研究进展.     

真核生物的MAPK级联信号传递途径

MAPK级联途径在真核生物细胞的信号传递过程中起着重要的作用.MAPK级联途径由MAPK、MAPKK和MAPKKK三类酶蛋白组成.这三类蛋白质的结构非常保守,通过磷酸化作用传递各种信号.在酵母和动、植物细胞中已经发现了一系列的MAPK级联途径成员,使真核生物的信号传递途径逐渐得到阐明.     

JNK活化机制的研究进展

cJun氨基末端激酶(JNK)家族是促分裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)超家族成员之一,MAPK信号通路是多级蛋白激酶的级联反应,包括三个关键的激酶:MAPK、MAPK的激酶(MAPKK)和MAPK激酶的激酶(MAPKKK).JNK信号通路中有许多支架蛋白,如:JIP、JAMP、POSH等,能够与JNK及JNK信号通路中相关成员结合成复合物,调节它们的活性和细胞内定位,JNK信号通路可被细胞因子、生长因子、应激等多种因素激活,大量实验提示JNK活化在细胞增殖、细胞凋亡、应激反应以及多种人类疾病的发生与发展中起着重要的作用.JNK信号通路与其他信号通路间也有着相互作用.现对JNK活化机制的研究进展进行综述.     

酸性鞘磷脂水解酶和MAPK信号通路在UVA诱导细胞凋亡中的作用

为了探讨酸性鞘磷脂水解酶 (ASM)和MAPK信号通路在UVA诱导的细胞凋亡中的作用 ,用DNA梯形条带 (DNAladder)和荧光显微镜鉴定细胞凋亡 ,Western印迹分析MAPK信号通路的激活情况 .结果显示 :①经UVA照射 ,正常的淋巴母细胞JY出现严重的细胞凋亡 ,而ASM遗传性缺陷的淋巴母细胞MS1 4 1 8出现轻微凋亡 ;给予ASM特异性抑制剂NB6 ,UVA诱导的JY细胞凋亡明显减轻 ,表明UVA诱导的细胞凋亡依赖于ASM .②UVA照射后 ,磷酸化ERK含量在MS1 4 1 8细胞中明显升高 ,在JY细胞中受到抑制 ;UVA照射前给予NB6 ,JY细胞中磷酸化ERK含量上升 ,表明ASM能抑制ERK的激活 .③UVA照射后 ,磷酸化JNK含量在MS1 4 1 8细胞中几乎没有变化 ,而在JY细胞中含量升高 ;UVA照射前给予NB6 ,JY细胞中磷酸化JNK含量没有明显升高 ,表明ASM激活JNK通路 .④NB6对UVA激活的p38MAPK信号通路没有影响 ,表明p38的激活与ASM关系不大 .研究表明 ,UVA诱导的细胞凋亡是通过激活ASM、激活JNK信号通路并抑制ERK信号通路来完成的     

经MAPK信号转导通路介导的糖皮质激素的作用机制

糖皮质激素(GC)通过膜受体快速激活细胞内信号传导通路的机制,主要涉及ERK,JNK/SAPK和P38等MAPK家族的重要成员.GC在许多细胞中对ERK起抑制作用,在不同的细胞中,GC能激活JNK或抑制其活性,即具有一定的细胞特异性.GC还直接或间接地激活P38途径.GC激活MAPK介导的信号传导通路,产生一系列生物学效应,如抑制细胞的生长的繁殖,介导细胞的凋亡等.     

hLBH的转录活性及其在MAPK信号转导途径中的作用

hLBH是一个人类心脏发育相关的候选基因,研究了hLBH的转录活性及其在MAPK信号途径中的作用.荧光素酶检测实验表明hLBH是一个转录激活因子.基因结构分段实验证明hLBH的两个模体在调节转录激活中起着重要的作用.将hLBH蛋白分别与SRE和AP-1共转染之后激活了SRE和AP-1的活性.这些结果表明hLBH可能通过MAPK信号途径来介导细胞功能.     

丝裂原活化蛋白激酶激活蛋白激酶(MK)研究进展

丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)信号通路介导多种重要的细胞生理反应.对下游蛋白激酶的磷酸化是MAPK家族成员发挥生理作用的重要方式.在MAPK的下游存在3个结构上相关的MAPK激活蛋白激酶(MAPKAPKorMK),即MK2,MK3和MK5.在被MAPK激活后,MK可将信号传递至细胞内不同靶标,从而在转录和翻译水平调节基因表达,调控细胞骨架和细胞周期,介导细胞迁移和胚胎发育.最近,在基因敲除研究的基础上,不同MK亚族成员之间的功能区分已经逐渐明晰,使我们对于MK的认识有了长足的进步.     

病原菌调节宿主细胞丝裂原活化蛋白激酶免疫防御信号的机理

丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)家族广泛存在于高等生物中,介导多种生物学进程,在固有免疫防御中发挥重要作用,是真核细胞抵御病原菌侵染的第一道防线.越来越多的研究发现,病原菌可以利用多种方式激活或者抑制MAPK信号通路来增强其自身侵染力.简单介绍了MAPK信号通路的背景并详细总结了近几年关于病原菌如何作用于MAPK信号通路的研究工作,希望以此能够拓展对病原菌与宿主细胞作用方式的认识,深化对MAPK重要作用的了解.     

p38MAPK介导的胶质细胞iNOS的转录激活机制

丝裂原激活蛋白激酶(MAPK)酶级联反应系统参与胶质细胞中iNOS的合成.通过瞬时转染p38MAPK途径中上游激酶,MAPK激酶3(MKK3)和MAPK激酶6 (MKK6 )表达质粒,进一步了解p38MAPK级联传导信号系统调节iNOS基因在胶质细胞中的转录激活机制.MKK3或MKK6表达质粒与接有荧光素酶(luciferase ,Luc)的大鼠iNOS启动基因质粒(iNOS Luc)联合转染C6星形胶质细胞株引起iNOS Luc的激活,并且使细胞因子诱导的iNOSmRNA的表达增强.这两种效应都能够被p38MAPK抑制剂SB2 0 35 80所抑制.MKK3 6也可以诱导核因子κB(NFκB Luc)依赖的转录活性.这些分子水平的研究结果为p38MAPK信号级联传导途径在调节大鼠胶质细胞中iNOS基因转录激活中的重要作用,包括转录因子NFκB的作用提供了证据.通过阻断iNOS表达或NO的生成,抑制细胞炎症发生,为防治神经细胞炎症反应性疾病提供实验依据.     

丝裂原活化蛋白激酶信号通路相关研究

丝裂原活化蛋白激酶信号通路是生物体内重要的信号转导系统之一,参与介导细胞生长、发育、分裂、分化等多种生理反应过程。在哺乳动物细胞中存在5个MAPK亚族,分别是ERK1／2、JNK、p38、ERK3／4和ERK5。MAPK通常定位于细胞质中,受激活后移行进入细胞核,并产生相应的生理作用。     

Growth factors induce nuclear translocation of MAP kinases (p42mapk and p44mapk) but not of their activator MAP kinase kinase (p45mapkk) in fibroblasts

Mitogen-activated protein kinases (p42mapk and p44mapk) are serine/threonine kinases that are activated rapidly in cells stimulated with various extracellular signals. This activation is mediated via MAP kinase kinase (p45mapkk), a dual specificity kinase which phosphorylates two key regulatory threonine and tyrosine residues of MAP kinases. We reported previously that the persistent phase of MAP kinase activation is essential for mitogenically stimulated cells to pass the "restriction point" of the cell cycle. Here, using specific polyclonal antibodies and transfection of epitope-tagged recombinant MAP kinases we demonstrate that these signaling protein kinases undergo distinct spatio-temporal localization in growth factor-stimulated cells. In G0-arrested hamster fibroblasts the activator p45mapkk and MAP kinases (p42mapk, p44mapk) are mainly cytoplasmic. Subsequent to mitogenic stimulation by serum or alpha-thrombin both MAP kinase isoforms translocate into the nucleus. This translocation is rapid (seen in 15 min), persistent (at least during the entire G1 period up to 6 h), reversible (by removal of the mitogenic stimulus) and apparently 'coupled' to the mitogenic potential; it does not occur in response to nonmitogenic agents such as alpha-thrombin-receptor synthetic peptides and phorbol esters that fail to activate MAP kinases persistently. When p42mapk and p44mapk are expressed stably at high levels, they are found in the nucleus of resting cells; this nuclear localization is also apparent with kinase-deficient mutants (p44mapk T192A or Y194F). In marked contrast the p45mapkk activator remains cytoplasmic even during prolonged growth factor stimulation and even after high expression levels achieved by transfection. We propose that the rapid and persistent nuclear transfer of p42mapk and p44mapk during the entire G0-G1 period is crucial for the function of these kinases in mediating the growth response.     

MAP kinase dynamics in yeast.

MAP kinase pathways play key roles in cellular responses towards extracellular signals. In several cases, the three core kinases interact with a scaffold molecule, but the function of these scaffolds is poorly understood. They have been proposed to contribute to signal specificity, signal amplification, or subcellular localization of MAP kinases. Several MAP kinases translocate to the nucleus in response to their activation, suggesting that nuclear transport may provide a regulatory mechanism. Here we describe new applications for Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) and Fluorescence Loss In Photobleaching (FLIP), to study dynamic translocations of MAPKs between different subcellular compartments. We have used these methods to measure the nuclear/cytoplasmic dynamics of several yeast MAP kinases, and in particular to address the role of scaffold proteins for MAP-kinase signaling.     

Signaling,mitogenesis and the cytoskeleton: Where the action is

Stimulation of mitogenesis by the epidermal growth factor (EGF) operates through a pathway involving the receptor, the small G-protein Ras and protein kinases of the MAP kinase cascade. It is proposed that two of the critical steps of that pathway utilize localization of components to the plasma membrane where Ras is located: recruitment of the nucleotide exchange protein Sos to the phosphorylated EGF receptor via a complex with the SH2/SH3-containing protein Grb2 and recruitment of the protein kinase Raf to activated Ras. Moreover, it is then proposed that Raf associates with the cytoskeleton at the membrane as it is being activated. Other signaling elements, including class I receptor kinases, nonreceptor tyrosine kinases and tyrosine phosphatases, are known to function at specific cellular sites. These observations have led us to propose that localization of signaling components, and particularly sites at membrane-microfilament interfaces, play critical roles in cellular regulation.     

MAPK cascades and major abiotic stresses

Plants have evolved with complex signaling circuits that operate under multiple conditions and govern numerous cellular functions. Stress signaling in plant cells is a sophisticated network composed of interacting proteins organized into tiered cascades where the function of a molecule is dependent on the interaction and the activation of another. In a linear scheme, the receptors of cell surface sense the stimuli and convey stress signals through specific pathways and downstream phosphorylation events controlled by mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases and second messengers, leading to appropriate adaptive responses. The specificity of the pathway is guided by scaffolding proteins and docking domains inside the interacting partners with distinctive structures and functions. The flexibility and the fine-tuned organization of the signaling molecules drive the activated MAP kinases into the appropriate location and connection to control and integrate the information flow. Here, we overview recent findings of the involvement of MAP kinases in major abiotic stresses (drought, cold and temperature fluctuations) and we shed light on the complexity and the specificity of MAP kinase signaling modules.     

Translocation of cell‐penetrating peptides into Candida fungal pathogens

Cell‐penetrating peptides (CPPs) are small peptides capable of crossing cellular membranes while carrying molecular cargo. Although they have been widely studied for their ability to translocate nucleic acids, small molecules, and proteins into mammalian cells, studies of their interaction with fungal cells are limited. In this work, we evaluated the translocation of eleven fluorescently labeled peptides into the important human fungal pathogens Candida albicans and C. glabrata and explored the mechanisms of translocation. Seven of these peptides (cecropin B, penetratin, pVEC, MAP, SynB, (KFF)₃K, and MPG) exhibited substantial translocation (>80% of cells) into both species in a concentration‐dependent manner, and an additional peptide (TP‐10) exhibiting strong translocation into only C. glabrata. Vacuoles were involved in translocation and intracellular trafficking of the peptides in the fungal cells and, for some peptides, escape from the vacuoles and localization in the cytosol were correlated to toxicity toward the fungal cells. Endocytosis was involved in the translocation of cecropin B, MAP, SynB, MPG, (KFF)₃K, and TP‐10, and cecropin B, penetratin, pVEC, and MAP caused membrane permeabilization during translocation. These results indicate the involvement of multiple translocation mechanisms for some CPPs. Although high levels of translocation were typically associated with toxicity of the peptides toward the fungal cells, SynB was translocated efficiently into Candida cells at concentrations that led to minimal toxicity. Our work highlights the potential of CPPs in delivering antifungal molecules and other bioactive cargo to Candida pathogens.     

Arrestin-mediated signaling: Is there a controversy?

The activation of the mitogen-activated protein(MAP) kinases extracellular signal-regulated kinase(ERK)1/2 was traditionally used as a readout of signaling of G protein-coupled receptors(GPCRs) via arrestins, as opposed to conventional GPCR signaling via G proteins. Several recent studies using HEK293 cells where all G proteins were genetically ablated or inactivated, or both non-visual arrestins were knocked out, demonstrated that ERK1/2 phosphorylation requires G protein activity, but does not necessarily require the presence of non-visual arrestins. This appears to contradict the prevailing paradigm. Here we discuss these results along with the recent data on gene edited cells and arrestinmediated signaling. We suggest that there is no real controversy. G proteins might be involved in the activation of the upstream-most MAP3Ks, although in vivo most MAP3K activation is independent of heterotrimeric G proteins, being initiated by receptor tyrosine kinases and/or integrins. As far as MAP kinases are concerned, the best-established role of arrestins is scaffolding of the three-tiered cascades(MAP3K-MAP2 K-MAPK). Thus, it seems likely that arrestins, GPCRbound and free, facilitate the propagation of signals in these cascades, whereas signal initiation via MAP3K activation may be independent of arrestins. Different MAP3Ks are activated by various inputs, some of which are mediated by G proteins, particularly in cell culture, where we artificially prevent signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases and integrins, thereby favoring GPCR-induced signaling. Thus, there is no reason to change the paradigm: Arrestins and G proteins play distinct non-overlapping roles in cell signaling.     

Stress‐induced vesicular assemblies of dual leucine zipper kinase are signaling hubs involved in kinase activation and neurodegeneration

Mitogen‐activated protein kinases (MAPKs) drive key signaling cascades during neuronal survival and degeneration. The localization of kinases to specific subcellular compartments is a critical mechanism to locally control signaling activity and specificity upon stimulation. However, how MAPK signaling components tightly control their localization remains largely unknown. Here, we systematically analyzed the phosphorylation and membrane localization of all MAPKs expressed in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons, under control and stress conditions. We found that MAP3K12/dual leucine zipper kinase (DLK) becomes phosphorylated and palmitoylated, and it is recruited to sphingomyelin‐rich vesicles upon stress. Stress‐induced DLK vesicle recruitment is essential for kinase activation; blocking DLK‐membrane interaction inhibits downstream signaling, while DLK recruitment to ectopic subcellular structures is sufficient to induce kinase activation. We show that the localization of DLK to newly formed vesicles is essential for local signaling. Inhibition of membrane internalization blocks DLK activation and protects against neurodegeneration in DRG neurons. These data establish vesicular assemblies as dynamically regulated platforms for DLK signaling during neuronal stress responses.     

Nitrosative/Oxidative Stress Conditions Regulate Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein (TXNIP) Expression and Thioredoxin-1 (TRX-1) Nuclear Localization

Thioredoxin (TRX-1) is a multifunctional protein that controls the redox status of other proteins. TRX-1 can be found in the extracellular milieu, cytoplasm and nucleus, and it has distinct functions in each environment. Previously, we studied the intracellular localization of TRX-1 and its relationship with the activation of the p21Ras - ERK1/2 MAP Kinases signaling pathway. In situations where this pathway was activated by stress conditions evoked by a nitrosothiol, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP), TRX-1 accumulated in the nuclear compartment due to nitrosylation of p21Ras and activation of downstream ERK1/2 MAP kinases. Presently, we demonstrate that ERK1/2 MAP Kinases activation and spatial distribution within cells trigger TRX-1 nuclear translocation through down-regulation of the physiological inhibitor of TRX-1, Thioredoxin Interacting Protein (TXNIP). Once activated by the oxidants, SNAP and H₂O₂, the ERK1/2 MAP kinases migrate to the nucleus. This is correlated with down-regulation of TXNIP. In the presence of the MEK inhibitors (PD98059 or UO126), or in cells transfected with the Protein Enriched in Astrocytes (PEA-15), a cytoplasmic anchor of ERK1/2 MAP kinases, TRX-1 nuclear migration and TXNIP down-regulation are no longer observed in cells exposed to oxidants. On the other hand, over-expression of TXNIP abolishes nuclear migration of TRX-1 under nitrosative/oxidative stress conditions, whereas gene silencing of TXNIP facilitates nuclear migration even in the absence of stress conditions. Studies based on the TXNIP promoter support this regulation. In conclusion, changes in TRX-1 compartmentalization under nitrosative/oxidative stress conditions are dependent on the expression levels of TXNIP, which are regulated by cellular compartmentalization and activation of the ERK1/2 MAP kinases.