Cutting edge: a crucial role for B7-CD28 in transmitting T help from APC to CTL

Although APC activation via CD40-CD40L signaling plays a critical role in enabling CD4(+) T cells to provide the "help" necessary for cross-priming of naive CTL, it is unclear how this makes the APC competent for priming. We have investigated the roles of B7-1/B7-2 and their receptors [corrected] CD28/CTLA-4 in cross-priming of CD4-dependent CTL in vivo. We find that both CD28 and B7-1/B7-2 are required for CD40-activated APC to cross-prime CTL, and that priming by CD40-activated APC was prevented by blockade of CD28. Conversely, augmenting CD28 signals with an agonistic Ab bypassed the requirement for CD4(+) T help or CD40 activation. Interestingly, blockade of the negative regulatory B7 receptor CTLA-4 failed to prime CTL in the absence of T help. These results support a model in which activation-induced up-regulation of B7 molecules on APC leads to increased CD28 signaling and a commitment to cross-priming of CD4-dependent CTL.     

Listeria monocytogenes infection overcomes the requirement for CD40 ligand in exogenous antigen presentation to CD8(+) T cells.

In vivo priming of CD8(+) T lymphocytes against exogenously processed model Ags requires CD4(+) T cell help, specifically interactions between CD40 ligand (CD40L) expressed by activated CD4(+) T cells and CD40, which is present on professional APC such as dendritic cells (DCs). To address this issue in the context of bacterial infection, we examined CD40L-CD40 interactions in CD8(+) T cell priming against an exogenously processed, nonsecreted bacterial Ag. CD40L interactions were blocked by in vivo treatment with anti-CD40L mAb MR-1, which inhibited germinal center formation and CD8(+) T cell cross-priming against an exogenous model Ag, OVA. In contrast, MR-1 treatment did not interfere with CD8(+) T cell priming against a nonsecreted or secreted recombinant Ag expressed by Listeria monocytogenes. Memory and secondary responses of CD8(+) T cells against nonsecreted and secreted bacterial Ags were also largely unimpaired by transient MR-1 treatment. When MR-1-treated mice were concurrently immunized with L. monocytogenes and OVA-loaded splenocytes, cross-priming of OVA-specific naive CD8(+) T cells occurred. No significant decline in cross-priming against OVA was measured when either TNF or IFN-gamma was neutralized in L. monocytogenes-infected animals, demonstrating that multiple signals exist to overcome CD40L blockade of CD8(+) T cell cross-priming during bacterial infection. These data support a model in which DCs can be stimulated in vivo through signals other than CD40, becoming APC that can effectively stimulate CD8(+) T cell responses against exogenous Ags during infection.     

Cutting edge: Toll-like receptor 9 expression is not required for CpG DNA-aided cross-presentation of DNA-conjugated antigens but essential for cross-priming of CD8 T cells

Covalent linkage of immunostimulatory CpG DNA to OVA results in CpG DNA-aided cross-presentation of OVA by dendritic cells (DCs). In vivo, cross-presentation is conditional for cross-priming of OVA-specific CD8 T cells. In this study, we investigated the involvement of the CpG DNA receptor Toll-like receptor (TLR)9 in CpG DNA-aided cross-presentation and cross-priming. Although CpG DNA-aided cross-presentation is not altered in TLR9-deficient cells, TLR9 is required for maturation of APC allowing cross-priming, as resulting in CTL function. These findings imply that TLR9 does not trigger endocytosis of CpG-OVA conjugates, but activates DCs downstream of endocytosis.     

Cutting edge: precursor frequency affects the helper dependence of cytotoxic T cells.

Generation of CTL immunity often depends on the availability of CD4 T cell help. In this report, we show that CTL responses induced by cross-priming can be converted from CD4-dependent to CD4-independent by increasing the frequency of CTL precursors. In the absence of CD4 T cells, high numbers of CTL precursors were able to expand in number and become effector CTL. The ability of high frequencies of CD8 T cells to override help was not due to their ability to signal CD40 via expression of CD154. These findings suggest that when precursor frequencies are high, priming of CD8 T cell responses may not require CD4 T cell help.     

Induction of CTL responses by simultaneous administration of liposomal peptide vaccine with anti-CD40 and anti-CTLA-4 mAb

Activation of APC via CD40-CD40 ligand pathway induces up-regulation of costimulatory molecules such as B7 and production of IL-12. Interaction between B7 on APC and CD28 on naive T cells is necessary for priming the T cells. On the other hand, interaction between B7 on APC and CTLA-4 on activated T cells transduces a negative regulatory signal to the activated T cells. In the present study, we attempted to generate tumor-specific CTL by s.c. administration of antigenic peptides encapsulated in multilamellar liposomes (liposomal peptide vaccine) with anti-CD40 mAb and/or anti-CTLA-4 mAb. Liposomal OVA257-264 and anti-CD40 mAb or anti-CTLA-4 mAb were administrated to C57BL/6 mice and the splenocytes were cocultured with OVA257-264 for 4 days. The splenic CD8+ T cells showed a significant cytotoxicity against EL4 cells transfected with cDNA of OVA. In addition, administration of both anti-CD40 and anti-CTLA-4 mAb enhanced the CTL responses. Considerable CTL responses were induced in MHC class II deficient mice by the same procedure. This finding indicated that CTL responses could be generated even in the absence of Th cells. When BALB/c mice were immunized with pRL1a peptide that are tumor-associated Ag of RLmale symbol1 leukemia cells using the same procedure, significant CTL responses were induced and prolonged survival of the BALB/c mice was observed following RLmale symbol1 inoculation. These results demonstrate that anti-CD40 mAb and anti-CTLA-4 mAb function as immunomodulators and may be applicable to specific cancer immunotherapy with antitumor peptide vaccine.     

Disruption of CD154:CD40 blocks generation of allograft immunity without affecting APC activation.

CD154 (CD40 ligand, gp39) interaction with its receptor CD40 has been shown to be critically important for the generation of cell-mediated as well as humoral immunity. It has been proposed that ligation of CD40 on APCs, presumably by activated Th cells, leads to increased APC function as defined by up-regulation of costimulatory molecules and enhancement of IL-12 production. In this report, we directly examined the contribution of the CD154:CD40 pathway in a murine model of allograft rejection. Generation of both the CTL and alloantibody responses following injection with allogeneic P815 tumor cells was severely compromised in CD154 knockout mice and wild-type C57BL/6 mice treated with the anti-CD154 mAb, MR1. Splenic production of IL-2, IFN-gamma, and TNF was significantly suppressed from CD154-deficient mice, indicating a lack of T cell priming. However, splenic cells from CD154 knockout mice induced comparable levels of CD86 expression and IL-12 production when compared with their wild-type littermates. The treatment of CD154-/- mice with the agonistic anti-CD40 mAb, FGK45, generated activated APCs yet failed to restore either the CTL or alloantibody responses to P815. Likewise, immunization with B7-transfected P815 tumor cells failed to generate expansion of the CTL effector population in CD154-/- mice. These results suggest that the generation of allograft immunity is dependent on the interaction of CD154 with CD40 but not primarily for the activation of APCs.     

OX40 ligand-transduced tumor cell vaccine synergizes with GM-CSF and requires CD40-Apc signaling to boost the host T cell antitumor response

Efficient T cell priming by GM-CSF and CD40 ligand double-transduced C26 murine colon carcinoma is not sufficient to cure metastases in a therapeutic setting. To determine whether a cellular vaccine that interacts directly with both APC and T cells in vivo might be superior, we generated C26 carcinoma cells transduced with the T cell costimulatory molecule OX40 ligand (OX40L) either alone (C26/OX40L) or together with GM-CSF (C26/GM/OX40L), which is known to activate APC. Mice injected with C26/OX40L cells displayed only a delay in tumor growth, while the C26/GM/OX40L tumor regressed in 85% of mice. Tumor rejection required granulocytes, CD4+, CD8+ T cells, and APC-mediated CD40-CD40 ligand cosignaling, but not IFN-gamma or IL-12 as shown using subset-depleted and knockout (KO) mice. CD40KO mice primed with C26/GM/OX40L cells failed to mount a CTL response, and T cells infiltrating the C26/GM/OX40L tumor were OX40 negative, suggesting an impairment in APC-T cell cross-talk in CD40KO mice. Indeed, CD4+ T cell-depleted mice failed to mount any CTL activity against the C26 tumor, while treatment with agonistic mAb to CD40, which acts on APC, bypassed the requirement for CD4+ T cells and restored CTL activation. C26/GM/OX40L cells cured 83% of mice bearing lung metastases, whereas C26/OX40L or C26/GM vaccination cured only 28 and 16% of mice, respectively. These results indicate the synergistic activity of OX40L and GM-CSF in a therapeutic setting.     

Molecular and cellular requirements for enhanced antigen cross-presentation to CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes

MHC class I-mediated cross-priming of CD8 T cells by APCs is critical for CTL-based immunity to viral infections and tumors. We have shown previously that tumor-secreted heat shock protein gp96-chaperoned peptides cross prime CD8 CTL that are specific for genuine tumor Ags and for the surrogate Ag OVA. We now show that tumor-secreted heat shock protein gp96-chaperoned peptides enhance the efficiency of Ag cross-priming of CD8 CTL by several million-fold over the cross-priming activity of unchaperoned protein alone. Gp96 also acts as adjuvant for cross-priming by unchaperoned proteins, but in this capacity gp96 is 1000-fold less active than as a peptide chaperone. Mechanistically, the in situ secretion of gp96-Ig by transfected tumor cells recruits and activates dendritic cells and NK cells to the site of gp96 release and promotes CD8 CTL expansion locally. Gp96-mediated cross-priming of CD8 T cells requires B7.1/2 costimulation but proceeds unimpeded in lymph node-deficient mice, in the absence of NKT and CD4 cells and without CD40L. Gp96-driven MHC I cross-priming of CD8 CTL in the absence of lymph nodes provides a novel mechanism for local, tissue-based CTL generation at the site of gp96 release. This pathway may constitute a critically important, early detection, and rapid response mechanism that is operative in parenchymal tissues for effective defense against tissue damaging antigenic agents.     

MHC class I-restricted cytotoxic lymphocyte responses induced by enterotoxin-based mucosal adjuvants

The ability of enterotoxin-based mucosal adjuvants to induce CD8+ MHC class I-restricted CTL responses to a codelivered bystander Ag was examined. Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin (LT), or derivatives of LT carrying mutations in the A subunit (LTR72, LTK63), were tested in parallel with cholera toxin (CT) or a fusion protein consisting of the A1 subunit of CT fused to the Ig binding domain of Staphylococcus aureus protein A (called CTA1-DD). Intranasal (i.n.) immunization of C57BL/6 mice with CT, CTA1-DD, LT, LTR72, LTK63, but not rLT-B, elicited MHC class I-restricted CD8+ T cell responses to coadministered OVA or the OVA CTL peptide SIINFEKL (OVA257-264). CT, LT, and LTR72 also induced CTL responses to OVA after s.c. or oral coimmunization whereas LTK63 only activated responses after s.c. coimmunization. rLT-B was unable to adjuvant CTL responses to OVA or OVA257-264 administered by any route. Mice treated with an anti-CD4 mAb to deplete CD4+ T cells mounted significant OVA-specific CTL responses after i.n. coadministration of LT with OVA or OVA257-264. Both 51Cr release assays and IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assays indicated that IFN-gamma-/- and IL-12 p40-/- gene knockout mice developed CTL responses equivalent to those detected in normal C57BL/6 mice. The results highlight the versatility of toxin-based adjuvants and suggest that LT potentiates CTL responses independently of IL-12 and IFN-gamma and probably by a mechanism unrelated to cross-priming.     

Analysis of 4-1BB ligand (4-1BBL)-deficient mice and of mice lacking both 4-1BBL and CD28 reveals a role for 4-1BBL in skin allograft rejection and in the cytotoxic T cell response to influenza virus.

4-1BB ligand (4-1BBL) is a member of the TNF family expressed on activated APC. 4-1BBL binds to 4-1BB (CD137) on activated CD4 and CD8 T cells and in conjunction with strong signals through the TCR provides a CD28-independent costimulatory signal leading to high level IL-2 production by primary resting T cells. Here we report the immunological characterization of mice lacking 4-1BBL and of mice lacking both 4-1BBL and CD28. 4-1BBL-/- mice mount neutralizing IgM and IgG responses to vesicular stomatitis virus that are indistinguishable from those of wild-type mice. 4-1BBL-/- mice show unimpaired CTL responses to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) and exhibit normal skin allograft rejection but have a weaker CTL response to influenza virus than wild-type mice. 4-1BBL-/-CD28-/- mice retain the CTL response to LCMV, respond poorly to influenza virus, and exhibit a delay in skin allograft rejection. In agreement with these in vivo results, allogeneic CTL responses of CD28-/- but not CD28+/+ T cells to 4-1BBL-expressing APC are substantially inhibited by soluble 4-1BB receptor as is the in vitro secondary response of CD28+ T cells to influenza virus peptides. TCR-transgenic CD28-/- LCMV glycoprotein-specific T cells are insensitive to the presence of 4-1BBL when a wild-type peptide is used, but the response to a weak agonist peptide is greatly augmented by the presence of 4-1BBL. These results further substantiate the idea that different immune responses vary in their dependence on costimulation and suggest a role for 4-1BBL in augmenting suboptimal CTL responses in vivo.     

CD4 help-independent induction of cytotoxic CD8 cells to allogeneic P815 tumor cells is absolutely dependent on costimulation

Mice made transgenic (Tg) for a rat anti-mouse CD4 Ab (GK mice) represent a novel CD4-deficient model. They not only lack canonical CD4 cells in the periphery, but also lack the residual aberrant Th cells that are found in CD4-/- mice and MHC class II-/- mice. To analyze the role of CD4 help and costimulation for CTL induction against alloantigens, we have assessed the surface and functional phenotype of CD8 cells in vivo (e.g., clearance of allogeneic P815 cells) and in vitro. In our CD4-deficient GK mice, CTL responses to allogeneic P815 cells were induced, albeit delayed, and were sufficient to eliminate P815 cells. Induction of CTL and elimination of allogeneic P815 cells were inhibited both in the presence and absence of CD4 cells by temporary CD40 ligand blockade. This indicated that direct interaction of CD40/CD40L between APCs and CD8 cells may be an accessory signal in CTL induction (as well as the indirect pathway via APC/CD4 interaction). Furthermore, whereas in CTLA4Ig single Tg mice P815 cells were rejected promptly, in the double Tg GK/CTLA4Ig mice CTL were not induced and allogeneic P815 cells were not rejected. These findings suggest that CD40/CD40L is involved in both CD4-dependent and CD4-independent pathways, and that B7/CD28 is pivotal in the CD4-independent pathway of CTL induction against allogeneic P815 cells.     

Reversal of CD8+ T cell ignorance and induction of anti-tumor immunity by peptide-pulsed APC

In the present report, we have studied the potential of naive and activated effector CD8(+) T cells to function as anti-tumor T cells to a solid tumor using OVA-specific T cells from TCR-transgenic OT-I mice. Adoptive transfer of naive OT-I T cells into tumor-bearing syngeneic mice did not inhibit tumor cell growth. The adoptively transferred OT-I T cells did not proliferate in lymphoid tissue of tumor-bearing mice and were not anergized by the tumor. In contrast, adoptive transfer of preactivated OT-I CTL inhibited tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that E.G7 was susceptible to immune effector cells. Importantly, naive OT-I T cells proliferated and elicited an anti-tumor response if they were adoptively transferred into normal or CD4-deficient mice that were then vaccinated with GM-CSF-induced bone marrow-derived OVA-pulsed APC. Collectively, these data indicate that even though naive tumor-specific T cells are present at a relatively high fraction they remain ignorant of the tumor and demonstrate that a CD8-mediated anti-tumor response can be induced by Ag-pulsed APC without CD4 T cell help.     

CD4 T cell-dependent conditioning of dendritic cells to produce IL-12 results in CD8-mediated graft rejection and avoidance of tolerance

Rejection of ectopic heart transplants expressing OVA requires OVA-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells. In the absence of CD4 T cells, OVA-specific CD8 T cells proliferate and migrate to the graft, but fail to develop cytolytic functions. With CD4 T cells present, clonal expansion of the CD8 T cells is only marginally increased but the cells now develop effector functions and mediate rapid graft rejection. In the presence of CD4 T cells, Ag and B7 levels do not increase on dendritic cells but IL-12 production is up-regulated, and this requires CD154 expression on the CD4 T cells. OVA-specific CD8 T cells lacking the IL-12 receptor fail to differentiate or mediate graft rejection even when CD4 T cells are present. Thus, CD4 T cells condition dendritic cells by inducing the production of IL-12, which is needed as the "third signal" for CD8 T cell differentiation and avoidance of tolerance.     

IL-12 augments CD8+ T cell development for contact hypersensitivity responses and circumvents anti-CD154 antibody-mediated inhibition.

During sensitization with dinitrofluorobenzene for contact hypersensitivity (CHS) responses, hapten-specific CD8(+) T cells develop into IFN-gamma-producing cells, and CD4(+) T cells develop into IL-4/IL-5-producing cells. Administration of IL-12 during sensitization skews CD4(+) T cell development to IFN-gamma-producing cells, resulting in exaggerated CHS responses. In the current report we tested the role of IL-12 on CD8(+) T cell development during sensitization and elicitation of CHS to dinitrofluorobenzene. Administration of IL-12 during hapten sensitization induced the expression of IL-12Rbeta2 on both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, augmented IFN-gamma production by these T cell populations, and increased the magnitude and duration of the CHS response to hapten challenge. CHS responses were virtually identical in wild-type and IL-12 p40(-/-) mice. Since engagement of CD40 on APC may stimulate IL-12 production, we also tested the role of CD40-CD154 interactions on the development of IFN-gamma-producing CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells following hapten sensitization. Development of IFN-gamma-producing CD4(+) T cells during hapten sensitization was absent in wild-type mice treated with anti-CD154 mAb or in CD154(-/-) mice. In contrast, the absence of CD40-CD154 signaling had little or no impact on the development of IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells. These results demonstrate that the development of hapten-specific Th1 effector CD4(+) T cells in CHS requires both CD40-CD154 interactions and IL-12, whereas the development of IFN-gamma-producing effector CD8(+) T cells can occur independently of these pathways.     

Archaeosomes induce long-term CD8+ cytotoxic T cell response to entrapped soluble protein by the exogenous cytosolic pathway, in the absence of CD4+ T cell help

The unique ether glycerolipids of ARCHAEA: can be formulated into vesicles (archaeosomes) with strong adjuvant activity for MHC class II presentation. Herein, we assess the ability of archaeosomes to facilitate MHC class I presentation of entrapped protein Ag. Immunization of mice with OVA entrapped in archaeosomes resulted in a potent Ag-specific CD8(+) T cell response, as measured by IFN-gamma production and cytolytic activity toward the immunodominant CTL epitope OVA(257-264). In contrast, administration of OVA with aluminum hydroxide or entrapped in conventional ester-phospholipid liposomes failed to evoke significant CTL response. The archaeosome-mediated CD8(+) T cell response was primarily perforin dependent because CTL activity was undetectable in perforin-deficient mice. Interestingly, a long-term CTL response was generated with a low Ag dose even in CD4(+) T cell deficient mice, indicating that the archaeosomes could mediate a potent T helper cell-independent CD8(+) T cell response. Macrophages incubated in vitro with OVA archaeosomes strongly stimulated cytokine production by OVA-specific CD8(+) T cells, indicating that archaeosomes efficiently delivered entrapped protein for MHC class I presentation. This processing of Ag was Brefeldin A sensitive, suggesting that the peptides were transported through the endoplasmic reticulum and presented by the cytosolic MHC class I pathway. Finally, archaeosomes induced a potent memory CTL response to OVA even 154 days after immunization. This correlated to strong Ag-specific up-regulation of CD44 on splenic CD8(+) T cells. Thus, delivery of proteins in self-adjuvanting archaeosomes represents a novel strategy for targeting exogenous Ags to the MHC class I pathway for induction of CTL response.     

CD28, TNF receptor,and IL-12 are critical for CD4-independent cross-priming of therapeutic antitumor CD8+ T cells

Previously, we have shown that priming of therapeutic CD8(+) T cells in tumor vaccine-draining lymph nodes of mice vaccinated with GM-CSF secreting B16BL6 melanoma cells occurs independent of CD4 T cell help. In this study, we examined the contribution of the major costimulatory molecules, CD40 ligand (CD40L), CD80, and CD86, in the priming of CD8(+) T cells. Priming of therapeutic CD8(+) T cells by a GM-CSF-transduced tumor vaccine did not require CD40 and CD40L interactions, as therapeutic T cells could be generated from mice injected with anti-CD40L Ab and from CD40L knockout mice. However, costimulation via either CD80 or CD86 was required, as therapeutic T cells could be generated from mice injected with either anti-CD80 or anti-CD86 Ab alone, but administration of both Abs completely inhibited the priming of therapeutic T cells. Blocking experiments also identified that priming of therapeutic T cells in MHC class II-deficient mice required TNFR and IL-12 signaling, but signaling through CD40, lymphotoxin-betaR, or receptor activator of NF-kappaB was not essential. Thus, cross-priming of therapeutic CD8(+) T cells by a tumor vaccine transduced with GM-CSF requires TNFR, IL-12, and CD28 signaling.     

Factors affecting the efficiency of CD8+ T cell cross-priming with exogenous antigens

Processing of exogenous protein Ags by APC leads predominantly to presentation of peptides on class II MHC and, thus, stimulation of CD4+ T cell responses. However, "cross-priming" can also occur, whereby peptides derived from exogenous Ags become displayed on class I MHC molecules and stimulate CD8+ T cell responses. We compared the efficiency of cross-priming with exogenous proteins to use of peptide Ags in human whole blood using a flow cytometry assay to detect T cell intracellular cytokine production. CD8+ T cell responses to whole CMV proteins were poorly detected (compared with peptide responses) in most CMV-seropositive donors. Such responses could be increased by using higher doses of Ag than were required to achieve maximal CD4+ T cell responses. A minority of donors displayed significantly more efficient CD8+ T cell responses to whole protein, even at low Ag doses. These responses were MHC class I-restricted and dependent upon proteosomal processing, indicating that they were indeed due to cross-priming. The ability to efficiently cross-prime was not a function of the number of dendritic cells in the donor's blood. Neither supplementation of freshly isolated dendritic cells nor use of cultured, Ag-pulsed dendritic cells could significantly boost CD8 responses to whole-protein Ags in poorly cross-priming donors. Interestingly, freshly isolated monocytes performed almost as well as dendritic cells in inducing CD8 responses via cross-priming. In conclusion, the efficiency of cross-priming appears to be poor in most donors and is dependent upon properties of the individual's APC and/or T cell repertoire. It remains unknown whether cross-priming ability translates into any clinical advantage in ability to induce CD8+ T cell responses to foreign Ags.     

Activation of dendritic cells that cross-present tumor-derived antigen licenses CD8+ CTL to cause tumor eradication

The fate of naive CD8(+) T cells is determined by the environment in which they encounter MHC class I presented peptide Ags. The manner in which tumor Ags are presented is a longstanding matter of debate. Ag presentation might be mediated by tumor cells in tumor draining lymph nodes or via cross-presentation by professional APC. Either pathway is insufficient to elicit protective antitumor immunity. We now demonstrate using a syngeneic mouse tumor model, expressing an Ag derived from the early region 1A of human adenovirus type 5, that the inadequate nature of the antitumor CTL response is not due to direct Ag presentation by the tumor cells, but results from presentation of tumor-derived Ag by nonactivated CD11c(+) APC. Although this event results in division of naive CTL in tumor draining lymph nodes, it does not establish a productive immune response. Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with dendritic cell-stimulating agonistic anti-CD40 mAb resulted in systemic efflux of CTL with robust effector function capable to eradicate established tumors. For efficacy of anti-CD40 treatment, CD40 ligation of host APC is required because adoptive transfer of CD40-proficient tumor-specific TCR transgenic CTL into CD40-deficient tumor-bearing mice did not lead to productive antitumor immunity after CD40 triggering in vivo. CpG and detoxified LPS (MPL) acted similarly as agonistic anti-CD40 mAb with respect to CD8(+) CTL efflux and tumor eradication. Together these results indicate that dendritic cells, depending on their activation state, orchestrate the outcome of CTL-mediated immunity against tumors, leading either to an ineffective immune response or potent antitumor immunity.     

CD4+ and CD8+ T cell priming for contact hypersensitivity occurs independently of CD40-CD154 interactions

The primary effector cells of contact hypersensitivity (CHS) responses to dintrofluorobenzene (DNFB) are IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells, whereas CD4(+) T cells regulate the magnitude and duration of the response. The requirement for CD40-CD154 engagement during CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cell priming by hapten-presenting Langerhans cells (hpLC) is undefined and was tested in the current study. Similar CHS responses to DNFB were elicited in wild-type and CD154(-/-) animals. DNFB sensitization of CD154(-/-) mice primed IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells and IL-4-producing CD4(+) T cells. However, anti-CD154 mAb MR1 given during hapten sensitization inhibited hapten-specific CD8(+), but not CD4(+), T cell development and the CHS response to challenge. F(ab')(2) of MR1 failed to inhibit CD8(+) T cell development and the CHS response suggesting that the mechanism of inhibition is distinct from that of CD40-CD154 blockade. Furthermore, anti-CD154 mAb did not inhibit CD8(+) T cell development and CHS responses in mice depleted of CD4(+) T cells or in CD4(-/-) mice. During in vitro proliferation assays, hpLC from mice treated with anti-CD154 mAb during DNFB sensitization were less stimulatory for hapten-primed T cells than hpLC from either control mice or mice depleted of CD4(+) T cells before anti-CD154 mAb administration. These results demonstrate that development of IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells and the CHS response are not dependent on CD40-CD154 interactions. This study proposes a novel mechanism of anti-CD154 mAb-mediated inhibition of CD8(+) T cell development where anti-CD154 mAb acts indirectly through CD4(+) T cells to impair the ability of hpLC to prime CD8(+) T cells.     

Antigenic epitopes regulate the phenotype of CD8+ CTL primed by exogenous antigens

We previously reported that insulin-specific, MHC class I-restricted CTL precursors can be primed by injecting C57BL/6 mice with bovine insulin in CFA. These bovine insulin-primed CTL displayed a type 0 CTL phenotype, producing IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, low levels of IFN-gamma, but no TNF-alpha. By contrast, CTL generated from C57BL/6 mice primed with OVA in CFA produced IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha but no IL-4, IL-5, or IL-10 and therefore were classified as type 1 CTL. Although CD4+ T cell subsets have been compared extensively in the literature, CTL subsets are less well characterized. Here, the phenotype, function, and requirements for the in vivo activation of type 1 and type 0 CTL cells were studied. Although both types of CTL express many of the same cell-surface Ags, OVA-specific CTL but not bovine insulin-primed CTL expressed CT-1, a carbohydrate epitope of CD45, and bovine insulin-primed CTL but not OVA-specific CTL expressed Fas constitutively. Priming of CTL was abrogated by depletion of phagocytic cells but not CD4+ T cells, whereas depletion of CD4+ T cells but not phagocytic cells inhibited Ab responses in the same mice. Neither endogenous IL-4 nor the dose of priming Ag altered the CTL phenotypes, but the antigenic peptides of OVA and bovine insulin were key to determining the differentiation of either type 1 or type 0 CTL. To our knowledge, this is the first time that antigenic epitopes have been demonstrated to influence the phenotype of Ag-specific CTL responses. These results may be relevant to the development of peptide vaccines in which a particular type of CTL response is desired.