Clinical application of the free thin anterolateral thigh flap in 31 consecutive patients

In this retrospective study, 31 reconstructions using thin anterolateral thigh flaps and six cadaveric dissections of the thigh were investigated in consideration of the anatomic variations of the perforator vessels in the adipose layer, the safe area of flap circulation, and the clinical indications.Three variations of the perforator vessel course in the adipose layer were predicted correctly. The safe radius of a thin anterolateral thigh flap with a thickness of 3 to 4 mm was determined to be approximately 9 cm from the point where the perforator met the skin. The use of a thin anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of the neck, axilla, anterior tibial area, dorsum of the foot, circumference on the ankle, forearm, and dorsum of the hand was therefore recommended.     

Vascular anatomy of the anterolateral thigh flap

Arterial and venous anatomy and their relation to the anterolateral thigh flap were examined in 10 specimens of six fresh cadavers in which radiopaque materials were injected into both the arterial and venous systems. Territories and positions of individual perforating arteries were measured, and the venous drainage pathway of the flap was analyzed. All specimens were radiographed stereoscopically to observe the three-dimensional structure of the arteries and veins. The territory of each perforating artery was smaller than expected. Most of the venous blood that had perfused the dermis was considered to pool in a polygonal venous network located in the skin layer and to enter the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery through large descending veins. The venous territories were considered different from the arterial territories. The findings in this study suggest that the design of the anterolateral thigh flap should be based on the venous architecture rather than on the arterial architecture and that the flap survival rate might be improved if thinning is performed appropriately.     

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the oral cavity using the free anterolateral thigh flap.

Oral cavity reconstruction after removal of locally advanced tumors is particularly difficult because anatomical restoration must accurately reproduce the original structure and enable effective and fast rehabilitation of mastication, swallowing, and phonation. The authors report their 2-year experience with 17 patients surgically treated for oral cavity cancer with reconstruction performed with the free anterolateral thigh flap. Thanks to its thinness and pliability, this flap has proven to be perfectly adaptable to the structural peculiarities of the resected areas and has enabled the authors to considerably reduce the cosmetic and functional complications in the donor area observed with other flaps (such as the radial forearm flap). Flap grafting has always been complete and regular, and no intraoperative and postoperative complications have been observed. Swallowing recovery has always been satisfactory. On the basis of the authors' results, their current approach to oral cavity reconstruction is based on the use of flaps that enable anatomical restoration of the resected areas and reduce morbidity of the donor site. They believe that the anterolateral thigh flap can offer all of these opportunities, and the surgery can be simultaneously performed by two surgical teams.     

Deltovertebral flap to cover a large scalp defect: case report.

A deltovertebral flap based on the perforating cutaneous branches of the posterior intercostal vessels (the exact opposite of the deltopectoral flap) was used successfully to cover a large scalp defect. The procedure is a rather hazardous one, due to the numerous stages and the awkward postoperative position. However, it may be used to repair the lateral aspect of the neck or the occipital region when a flap is necessary and other methods are not feasible.     

Simple approach to harvest of the anterolateral thigh flap

The free anterolateral thigh flap has proven to be invaluable for many types of reconstruction, ranging from upper and lower extremity trauma to head and neck reconstruction. There exist some controversies relating to certain difficulties in flap harvest because of the intramuscular route of its major perforator, which can exceed 80 percent and create a longer, more tedious dissection. Strategies to expedite flap harvest and minimize technical challenges have been proposed. The authors propose a simplified approach to harvest the anterolateral thigh flap founded on topographic surface anatomy and the intrinsic vascular anatomy of the flap. No Doppler imaging or angiography is used for preoperative perforator mapping.