Synthesis,cannabinoid receptor affinity,molecular modeling studies and in vivo pharmacological evaluation of new substituted 1-aryl-5-(1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamides. 2. Effect of the 3-carboxamide substituent on the affinity and selectivity profile

New substituted 1-aryl-5-(1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamides were synthesized by replacing the 2,4-dichlorobenzyl and cyclohexyl moieties at the 3-carboxamide nitrogen of the previously reported CB₁ receptor antagonists/inverse agonists 4 and 5. Several ligands showed potent affinity for the hCB₁ receptor, with K_i concentrations comparable to the reference compounds 1, 4 and 5, and exhibited CB₁ selectivity comparable to 1 and 2. Docking experiments and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations explained the potent hCB₁ binding affinity of compounds 31 and 37. According to our previous studies, 31 and 37 formed a H-bond with K3.28(192), which accounted for the high affinity for the receptor inactive state and the inverse agonist activity. The finding of inhibition of food intake following their acute administration to rats, supported the concept that the CB₁ selective compounds 4 and 52 act as antagonists/inverse agonists.     

Bioisosteric replacement of the hydrazide pharmacophore of the cannabinoid-1 receptor antagonist SR141716A. Part I: Potent, orally-active 1,4-disubstituted imidazoles

A new series of CB₁ receptor antagonists incorporating an imidazole-based isosteric replacement for the hydrazide moiety of rimonabant (SR141716) is disclosed. Members of this imidazole series possess potent/selective binding to the rCB₁ receptor and exhibit potent hCB₁ functional activity. Isopropyl analog 9a demonstrated activity in the tetrad assay and was orally-active in a food intake model.     

Increased expression of cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in Achilles tendinosis

Background

The endogenous cannabinoid system is involved in the control of pain. However, little is known as to the integrity of the cannabinoid system in human pain syndromes. Here we investigate the expression of the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB₁) in human Achilles tendons from healthy volunteers and from patients with Achilles tendinosis.

Methodology

Cannabinoid CB₁ receptor immunoreactivity (CB₁IR) was evaluated in formalin-fixed biopsies from individuals suffering from painful Achilles tendinosis in comparison with healthy human Achilles tendons.

Principal Findings

CB₁IR was seen as a granular pattern in the tenocytes. CB₁IR was also observed in the blood vessel wall and in the perineurium of the nerve. Quantification of the immunoreactivity in tenocytes showed an increase of CB₁ receptor expression in tendinosis tissue compared to control tissue.

Conclusion

Expression of cannabinoid receptor 1 is increased in human Achilles tendinosis suggesting that the cannabinoid system may be dysregulated in this disorder.     

Pharmacokinetic optimisation of novel indole-2-carboxamide cannabinoid CB1 antagonists

The pharmacokinetic based optimisation of a novel series of indole-2-carboxamide antagonists of the cannabinoid CB₁ receptor is disclosed. Compound 24 was found to be a highly potent and selective cannabinoid CB₁ antagonist with high predicted human oral bioavailability.     

Inhibition of sea urchin fertilization by fatty acid ethanolamides and cannabinoids

The influence of saturated and unsaturated fatty acid ethanolamides as well as Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹-THC), WIN 55,212-2 and cannabinoid CB₁ receptor antagonist SR 141716 on sea urchin fertilization was studied. The ethanolamides of arachidonic, oleic and linoleic acids but not saturated fatty acid (C₁₄–C₂₀) derivatives inhibited fertilization when pre-incubated with sperm cells. Δ⁹-THC and WIN 55,212-2 also inhibited fertilization, Δ⁹-THC being ten times as potent as WIN 55,212-2. Selective cannabinoid CB₁ receptor antagonist SR 141716 also blocked fertilization and did not antagonize the action of Δ⁹-THC. The obtained results indicate that different unsaturated fatty acid ethanolamides may control sea urchin fertilization, and that sea urchin sperm cell cannabinoid receptor may differ from the known cannabinoid receptor subtypes.     

Predicting the molecular interactions of CRIP1a–cannabinoid 1 receptor with integrated molecular modeling approaches

Cannabinoid receptors are a family of G-protein coupled receptors that are involved in a wide variety of physiological processes and diseases. One of the key regulators that are unique to cannabinoid receptors is the cannabinoid receptor interacting proteins (CRIPs). Among them CRIP1a was found to decrease the constitutive activity of the cannabinoid type-1 receptor (CB₁R). The aim of this study is to gain an understanding of the interaction between CRIP1a and CB₁R through using different computational techniques. The generated model demonstrated several key putative interactions between CRIP1a and CB₁R, including the critical involvement of Lys130 in CRIP1a.     

The effects of beta-arrestin1 deletion on acute cannabinoid activity,brain cannabinoid receptors and tolerance to cannabinoids in mice

Abstract

Context: Previous studies have indicated a role for beta-arrestin2 in the regulation of brain cannabinoid effects and cannabinoid CB₁ receptors, but whether beta-arrestin1 has a role has not been investigated. Objective: To determine the role of beta-arrestin1 in cannabinoid activity. Materials and methods: Beta-arrestin1 ?/? mice and their wild-type (+/+) counterparts were assayed for antinociceptive and temperature-decreasing effects of two ligands, Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and CP55940, after both single and repeated administration. In vitro assays examined the effects of deletion on CB₁ receptor density, agonist-binding and G-protein activation. Results: Deletion of beta-arrestin1 diminished the effects of CP55940 in both antinociception (latency to tail withdrawal) and temperature-depression assays in mice. However, deleting beta-arrestin1 had no effect on the actions of THC in either assay. Antagonist radioligand ([³H]SR141716A) saturation binding indicated no difference between beta-arrestin1 +/+ and ?/? mice in the density or affinity for cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in brain membranes. CP55940 agonist binding in brain membranes from beta-arrestin1 +/+ mice exhibited high- and intermediate-affinity sites, but beta-arrestin1 ?/? membranes exhibited an additional site with low affinity. CP55940 produced greater stimulation of [³⁵S]GTPγS binding to membranes from whole brain of beta-arrestin1 ?/? than +/+ mice. The rates of the development of tolerance to chronic THC or CP55940 administration did not appear to be affected by genotype. Discussion: Beta-arrestin1 appeared to mediate the actions of CP55940, but did not affect the activity of THC. Conclusion: Beta-arrestin1 regulates cannabinoid CB₁ receptor sensitivity in an agonist-selective manner, but may not be the primary mediator of tolerance to cannabinoid agonists.     

G-protein Receptor Kinase 5 Regulates the Cannabinoid Receptor 2-induced Up-regulation of Serotonin 2A Receptors

We have recently reported that cannabinoid agonists can up-regulate and enhance the activity of serotonin 2A (5-HT_2A) receptors in the prefrontal cortex (PFCx). Increased expression and activity of cortical 5-HT_2A receptors has been associated with neuropsychiatric disorders, such as anxiety and schizophrenia. Here we report that repeated CP55940 exposure selectively up-regulates GRK5 proteins in rat PFCx and in a neuronal cell culture model. We sought to examine the mechanism underlying the regulation of GRK5 and to identify the role of GRK5 in the cannabinoid agonist-induced up-regulation and enhanced activity of 5-HT_2A receptors. Interestingly, we found that cannabinoid agonist-induced up-regulation of GRK5 involves CB₂ receptors, β-arrestin 2, and ERK1/2 signaling because treatment with CB₂ shRNA lentiviral particles, β-arrestin 2 shRNA lentiviral particles, or ERK1/2 inhibitor prevented the cannabinoid agonist-induced up-regulation of GRK5. Most importantly, we found that GRK5 shRNA lentiviral particle treatment prevented the cannabinoid agonist-induced up-regulation and enhanced 5-HT_2A receptor-mediated calcium release. Repeated cannabinoid exposure was also associated with enhanced phosphorylation of CB₂ receptors and increased interaction between β-arrestin 2 and ERK1/2. These latter phenomena were also significantly inhibited by GRK5 shRNA lentiviral treatment. Our results suggest that sustained activation of CB₂ receptors, which up-regulates 5-HT_2A receptor signaling, enhances GRK5 expression; the phosphorylation of CB₂ receptors; and the β-arrestin 2/ERK interactions. These data could provide a rationale for some of the adverse effects associated with repeated cannabinoid agonist exposure.     

Targeting the endocannabinoid system with cannabinoid receptor agonists: pharmacological strategies and therapeutic possibilities

Human tissues express cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptors that can be activated by endogenously released ‘endocannabinoids’ or exogenously administered compounds in a manner that reduces the symptoms or opposes the underlying causes of several disorders in need of effective therapy. Three medicines that activate cannabinoid CB₁/CB₂ receptors are now in the clinic: Cesamet (nabilone), Marinol (dronabinol; Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹-THC)) and Sativex (Δ⁹-THC with cannabidiol). These can be prescribed for the amelioration of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (Cesamet and Marinol), stimulation of appetite (Marinol) and symptomatic relief of cancer pain and/or management of neuropathic pain and spasticity in adults with multiple sclerosis (Sativex). This review mentions several possible additional therapeutic targets for cannabinoid receptor agonists. These include other kinds of pain, epilepsy, anxiety, depression, Parkinson''s and Huntington''s diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, cancer, drug dependence, glaucoma, autoimmune uveitis, osteoporosis, sepsis, and hepatic, renal, intestinal and cardiovascular disorders. It also describes potential strategies for improving the efficacy and/or benefit-to-risk ratio of these agonists in the clinic. These are strategies that involve (i) targeting cannabinoid receptors located outside the blood-brain barrier, (ii) targeting cannabinoid receptors expressed by a particular tissue, (iii) targeting upregulated cannabinoid receptors, (iv) selectively targeting cannabinoid CB₂ receptors, and/or (v) adjunctive ‘multi-targeting’.     

Medicinal attributes of 1,2,3-triazoles: Current developments

1,2,3-Triazoles are important five-membered heterocyclic scaffold due to their extensive biological activities. This framework can be readily obtained in good to excellent yields on the multigram scale through click chemistry via reaction of aryl/alkyl halides, alkynes and NaN₃ under ambient conditions. It has been an emerging area of interest for many researchers throughout the globe owing to its immense pharmacological scope. The present work aims to summarize the current approaches adopted for the synthesis of the 1,2,3-triazole and medicinal significance of these architectures as a lead structure for the discovery of drug molecules such as COX-1/COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib, pyrazofurin), HIV protease inhibitors, CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist and much more which are in the pipeline of clinical trials. The emphasis has been given on the major advancements in the medicinal prospectus of this pharmacophore for the period during 2008–2016.     

In vivo pharmacology of endocannabinoids and their metabolic inhibitors: Therapeutic implications in Parkinson's disease and abuse liability

This review focuses on the behavioral pharmacology of endogenous cannabinoids (endocannabinoids) and indirect-acting cannabinoid agonists that elevate endocannabinoid tone by inhibiting the activity of metabolic enzymes. Similarities and differences between prototype cannabinoid agonists, endocannabinoids and inhibitors of endocannabinoid metabolism are discussed in the context of endocannabinoid pharmacokinetics in vivo. The distribution and function of cannabinoid and non-CB₁/CB₂ receptors are also covered, with emphasis on their role in disorders characterized by dopamine dysfunction, such as drug abuse and Parkinson's disease. Finally, evidence is presented to suggest that FAAH inhibitors lack the abuse liability associated with CB₁ agonists, although they may modify the addictive properties of other drugs, such as alcohol.     

A novel, broad-spectrum antitumor compound containing the 1-hydroxycyclohexa-2,5-dien-4-one group: the disclosure of a new antitumor pharmacophore in protoapigenone 1

The synthesis of a new compound 9 containing the 4-hydroxy-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-one system, a key elements toward elucidation of the protoapigenone 1 antitumor pharmacophore, was described. The compound showed potent in vitro antitumor potency with low micromolar IC₅₀’s against breast, ovarian, prostate, liver, pancreas, and blood cancer cell lines tested and could inhibit tumor growth in vivo but no significant impairment of hematopoiesis or immune function was observed. The minimum structural pharmacophore of 1 has now been refined.     

The influence of beta-arrestin2 on cannabinoid CB1 receptor coupling to G-proteins and subcellular localization and relative levels of beta-arrestin1 and 2 in mouse brain

Abstract

Context: Beta-arrestins are known to couple to some G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to regulate receptor internalization, G-protein coupling and signal transduction, but have not been investigated for most receptors, and for very few receptors in vivo. Previous studies have shown that beta-arrestin2 deletion enhances the efficacy of specific cannabinoid agonists. Objective: The present study hypothesized that brain cannabinoid CB₁ receptors are regulated by beta-arrestin2. Methods: Beta-arrestin2+/+ and ?/? mice were used. Western blotting was used to determine the relative levels of each beta-arrestin subtype in mouse brain. Receptor binding was measured to determine whether deletion of beta-arrestin2 influences agonist binding to brain CB₁ receptors, or the subcellular localization of CB₁ in brain membranes subjected to differential centrifugation. A variety of cannabinoid agonists from different chemical classes were investigated for their ability to activate G-proteins in the presence and absence of beta-arrestin2 in cerebellum, hippocampus and cortex. Results: No differences were found in the density of beta-arrestin1 or cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in several brains of beta-arrestin2+/+ versus ?/? mice. Differences between genotypes were found in the proportion of high- and low-affinity agonist binding sites in brain areas that naturally express higher levels of beta-arrestin2. Cortex from beta-arrestin2?/? mice contained less CB₁ in the P1 fraction and more CB₁ in the P2 fraction compared to beta-arrestin2+/+. Of the agonists assayed for activity, only Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exhibited a difference between genotypes, in that it was less efficacious in beta-arrestin2?/? than +/+ mouse membranes. Conclusion: Beta-arrestin2 regulates cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in brain.     

3D-pharmacophore model for RXRγ agonists

Three-dimensional pharmacophore models were generated for retinoid X receptor (RXR_γ) agonists using quantitative approach (CATALYST HypoRefine). One optimal pharmacophore model for selective RXR_γ agonists was determined through careful validation processes. The best quantitative model (Hypo-1) had five features and five excluded volumes: three hydrophobic aliphatic groups (HAL1, HAL2, and HAL3), one hydrophobic aromatic ring (HAR), and one hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA). The model was validated using a wide range of test molecules. It could predict agonist activity and identify highly potent molecules. The present results are valuable to discover and develop specific RXR_γ agonists with desired biological activities.     

3D Pharmacophore,hierarchical methods,and 5-HT4 receptor binding data

5-Hydroxytryptamine subtype-4 (5-HT₄) receptors have stimulated considerable interest amongst scientists and clinicians owing to their importance in neurophysiology and potential as therapeutic targets. A comparative analysis of hierarchical methods applied to data from one thousand 5-HT₄ receptor–ligand binding interactions was carried out. The chemical structures were described as chemical and pharmacophore fingerprints. The definitions of indices, related to the quality of the hierarchies in being able to distinguish between active and inactive compounds, revealed two interesting hierarchies with the Unity (1 active cluster) and pharmacophore fingerprints (4 active clusters). The results of this study also showed the importance of correct choice of metrics as well as the effectiveness of a new alternative of the Ward clustering algorithm named Energy (Minimum E-Distance method). In parallel, the relationship between these classifications and a previously defined 3D 5-HT₄ antagonist pharmacophore was established.     

Potential utility of histamine H3 receptor antagonist pharmacophore in antipsychotics

Histamine H₃ receptor (H₃R) antagonists have some antipsychotic properties although the clear molecular mechanism is still unknown. As actually the most effective and less side effective antipsychotics are drugs with multiple targets we have designed typical and atypical neuroleptics with an additional histamine H₃ pharmacophore. The 4-(3-piperidinopropoxy)phenyl pharmacophore moiety has been linked to amitriptyline, maprotiline, chlorpromazine, chlorprothixene, fluphenazine, and clozapine. Amide, amine and ester elements have been used generally to maintain or slightly shift affinity at dopamine D₂-like receptors (D₂ and D₃), to decrease affinity at histamine H₁ receptors, and to obtain H₃R ligands with low nanomolar or subnanomolar affinity. Change of effects at D₁-like receptors (D₁ and D₅) were heterogeneous. With these newly profiled compounds different antipsychotic properties might be achieved.     

Eicosanoid mediation of cannabinoid actions

Interactions between cannabinoids and eicosanoids have been observed for the last several decades and account for a variety of cannabinoid actions. These were seen both in vitro and in vivo and may provide a molecular basis for these actions. Some of the topics included in this review are; effects on adenylate cyclase activity, alteration of behavioral responses, reduction of pain sensation, reduction and resolution of inflammation, hypotensive and vasorelaxant responses, anti-cancer and anti-metastatic activities, reduction of intraocular pressure and others. The most widely studied cannabinoids so far are tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol. However, synthetic agents such as CP55,940, ajulemic acid, JWH-133 and WIN-55,212-2 were also investigated for interaction with eicosanoids. The endocannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol have been examined as well. Among the eicosanoids mediating cannabinoid actions are PGE₂, 15-deoxy-Δ12, 14-prostaglandin-J₂, lipoxin A₄, lipoxin B₄, and leukotriene B₄. Enzyme activities involved include monoacylglycerylipase, adenylatecyclase, phospholipase A₂, cyclooxygenases-1, 2 and 5, lipoxygenases-12 and 15. Receptors involved include CB1, CB2 and the EP3 and EP3 prostanoid receptors. While not all cannabinoid activities can be accounted for, many are best explained by eicosanoid participation. The recent surge in interest in “medical marijuana” makes understanding mechanisms of cannabinoid actions particularly important.     

Cannabinoid-based drugs targeting CB1 and TRPV1, the sympathetic nervous system,and arthritis

Chronic inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is accompanied by activation of the sympathetic nervous system, which can support the immune system to perpetuate inflammation. Several animal models of arthritis already demonstrated a profound influence of adrenergic signaling on the course of RA. Peripheral norepinephrine release from sympathetic terminals is controlled by cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB₁), which is activated by two major endocannabinoids (ECs), arachidonylethanolamine (anandamide) and 2-arachidonylglycerol. These ECs also modulate function of transient receptor potential channels (TRPs) located on sensory nerve fibers, which are abundant in arthritic synovial tissue. TRPs not only induce the sensation of pain but also support inflammation via secretion of pro-inflammatory neuropeptides. In addition, many cell types in synovial tissue express CB₁ and TRPs. In this review, we focus on CB₁ and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1)-mediated effects on RA since most anti-inflammatory mechanisms induced by cannabinoids are attributed to cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB₂) activation. We demonstrate how CB₁ agonism or antagonism can modulate arthritic disease. The concept of functional antagonism with continuous CB₁ activation is discussed. Since fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) is a major EC-degrading enzyme, the therapeutic possibility of FAAH inhibition is studied. Finally, the therapeutic potential of ECs is examined since they interact with cannabinoid receptors and TRPs but do not produce central side effects.     

The evolution and comparative neurobiology of endocannabinoid signalling

CB₁- and CB₂-type cannabinoid receptors mediate effects of the endocannabinoids 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and anandamide in mammals. In canonical endocannabinoid-mediated synaptic plasticity, 2-AG is generated postsynaptically by diacylglycerol lipase alpha and acts via presynaptic CB₁-type cannabinoid receptors to inhibit neurotransmitter release. Electrophysiological studies on lampreys indicate that this retrograde signalling mechanism occurs throughout the vertebrates, whereas system-level studies point to conserved roles for endocannabinoid signalling in neural mechanisms of learning and control of locomotor activity and feeding. CB₁/CB₂-type receptors originated in a common ancestor of extant chordates, and in the sea squirt Ciona intestinalis a CB₁/CB₂-type receptor is targeted to axons, indicative of an ancient role for cannabinoid receptors as axonal regulators of neuronal signalling. Although CB₁/CB₂-type receptors are unique to chordates, enzymes involved in biosynthesis/inactivation of endocannabinoids occur throughout the animal kingdom. Accordingly, non-CB₁/CB₂-mediated mechanisms of endocannabinoid signalling have been postulated. For example, there is evidence that 2-AG mediates retrograde signalling at synapses in the nervous system of the leech Hirudo medicinalis by activating presynaptic transient receptor potential vanilloid-type ion channels. Thus, postsynaptic synthesis of 2-AG or anandamide may be a phylogenetically widespread phenomenon, and a variety of proteins may have evolved as presynaptic (or postsynaptic) receptors for endocannabinoids.     

Atypical Responsiveness of the Orphan Receptor GPR55 to Cannabinoid Ligands

The cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB₁) and CB₂ cannabinoid receptors, associated with drugs of abuse, may provide a means to treat pain, mood, and addiction disorders affecting widespread segments of society. Whether the orphan G-protein coupled receptor GPR55 is also a cannabinoid receptor remains unclear as a result of conflicting pharmacological studies. GPR55 has been reported to be activated by exogenous and endogenous cannabinoid compounds but surprisingly also by the endogenous non-cannabinoid mediator lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI). We examined the effects of a representative panel of cannabinoid ligands and LPI on GPR55 using a β-arrestin-green fluorescent protein biosensor as a direct readout of agonist-mediated receptor activation. Our data demonstrate that AM251 and SR141716A (rimonabant), which are cannabinoid antagonists, and the lipid LPI, which is not a cannabinoid receptor ligand, are GPR55 agonists. They possess comparable efficacy in inducing β-arrestin trafficking and, moreover, activate the G-protein-dependent signaling of protein kinase CβII. Conversely, the potent synthetic cannabinoid agonist CP55,940 acts as a GPR55 antagonist/partial agonist. CP55,940 blocks GPR55 internalization, the formation of β-arrestin GPR55 complexes, and the phosphorylation of ERK1/2; CP55,940 produces only a slight amount of protein kinase CβII membrane recruitment but does not stimulate membrane remodeling like LPI, AM251, or rimonabant. Our studies provide a paradigm for measuring the responsiveness of GPR55 to a variety of ligand scaffolds comprising cannabinoid and novel compounds and suggest that at best GPR55 is an atypical cannabinoid responder. The activation of GPR55 by rimonabant may be responsible for some of the off-target effects that led to its removal as a potential obesity therapy.The CB₁² and CB₂ cannabinoid receptors comprise a two-member subfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are notable as the targets of the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) derivatives found in marijuana. More recently CB₁ receptors along with other GPCRs have been promoted as therapeutic pharmacological targets in the billion dollar weight loss market for controversial drugs such as rimonabant (SR141716A) and Fen-phen. Thus, an important utility of cannabinoid family receptors to society appears to arise from their role in regulating a broad spectrum of addiction-based behaviors, and the addition of new members to the cannabinoid receptor family may have social and economic implications that reach far beyond the initial scientific discovery. As a consequence, the re-classification of an orphan GPCR as a cannabinoid family member should be done with caution requiring strict criteria of receptor activation by THC derivatives or endogenous cannabinoid compounds and a widespread agreement of the results by the scientific community.Marijuana, one of the most widely abused substances (1), mediates many of its psychotropic effects by targeting CB₁ receptors in the central nervous system, but studies with CB₁ and CB₂ knock-out mice indicate that the complex pharmacological properties on pain, mood, and memory exhibited by exogenous cannabinoids and the endogenous arachidonic acid-based endo-cannabinoids, including anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), are not fully explained by their activation of CB₁ and CB₂ (2–4). The CB₁ and CB₂ receptors are 44% identical and signal through G_i/o-mediated pathways. Activation of either receptor is inhibitory for cAMP production via adenylyl cyclase and stimulatory for mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (extracellular-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2)) activation (5). However, the failure of these two receptors to account for the full complement of physiological effects observed with cannabinoid ligands has led to the hypothesis that additional cannabinoid-like receptors exist.The orphan GPCR, GPR55, which exhibits only 10–15% homology to the two human cannabinoid receptors (6), is one of a number of plausible cannabinoid family member candidates (7). GPR55 was first identified and mapped to human chromosome 2q37 a decade ago (8). In the human central nervous system, it is predominantly localized to the caudate, putamen, and striatum (8), coupling to Gα₁₃ (9, 10), Gα₁₂, or Gα_q (11).GPR55 has been tested against a number of cannabinoid ligands with mixed results. Observations using a GTPγS functional assay indicate that GPR55 is activated by nanomolar concentrations of the endocannabinoids 2-AG, virodhamine, noladin ether, and palmitoylethanolamine (10) and the atypical cannabinoids Abn-CBD and O-1602 (12) as well as by the drugs CP55,950, HU210, and Δ⁹-THC (11). Exposure of GPR55 to the cannabinoids THC and JWH015 in dorsal root ganglion neurons and in receptor-transfected HEK293 cells correlates with increases of intracellular Ca²⁺ (11). In contrast, GPR55 is insensitive to the CB₁ inverse agonist AM281 and the potent cannabinoid agonist WIN55212-2 but is antagonized by the marijuana constituent CBD (9, 10). However, Oka et al. (13) reported that GPR55 is not a typical cannabinoid receptor, as numerous endogenous and synthetic cannabinoids, including many mentioned above, had no effect on GPR55 activity. They present compelling data suggesting that the endogenous lipid LPI and its 2-arachidonyl analogs are agonists at GPR55 as a result of their abilities to phosphorylate extracellular-regulated kinase and induce calcium signaling (13, 14). Further studies indicate that LPI and the rimonabant-like CB₁ inverse agonist AM251 induce oscillatory Ca²⁺ release through Gα₁₃ and RhoA (9). These reports were all performed in HEK 293 cells, yet each documented a distinct and conflicting chemical space of agonists that recognized GPR55. To resolve these inconsistencies in classification, an alternative approach for identifying GPR55 ligands that is insensitive to the endogenous complement of cellular receptors could circumvent many of the challenges that have arisen in the measurements of G-protein signaling.β-Arrestins are intracellular proteins that bind and desensitize activated GPCRs and in the process form stable receptor/arrestin signaling complexes (15, 16). β-Arrestin redistribution to the activated membrane-bound receptor represents one of the early intracellular events provoked by agonist binding and, consequently, is less prone to a false positive or negative readout as compared with studying a downstream signaling event as a readout of receptor activation. β-arrestin-green fluorescent chimeras can make this process attractive to monitor by forming remarkably sensitive and specific probes of GPCR activation that are independent of downstream G-protein-mediated signaling (17–19). We have determined GPR55 responsiveness to a representative panel of cannabinoid ligands and LPI in the presence (and absence) of a β-arrestin2-green fluorescent protein (βarr2-GFP) biosensor. Our data demonstrate that LPI, the CB₁ inverse agonist/antagonists SR141716A, and AM251 are GPR55 agonists, and the CB₁ agonist CP55940 is a GPR55 antagonist/partial agonist. These data together with our inability to observe activation of GPR55 by Δ⁹-THC and endocannabinoids indicate that GPR55 should be classified as an atypical cannabinoid receptor at best.