Integration of the barley genetic and seed proteome maps for chromosome 1H, 2H, 3H, 5H and 7H

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was used to screen spring barley cultivars for differences in seed protein profiles. In parallel, 72 microsatellite (simple sequence repeat (SSR)) markers and 11 malting quality parameters were analysed for each cultivar. Over 60 protein spots displayed cultivar variation, including peroxidases, serpins and proteins with unknown functions. Cultivars were clustered based on the spot variation matrix. Cultivars with superior malting quality grouped together, indicating malting quality to be more closely correlated with seed proteomes than with SSR profiles. Mass spectrometry showed that some spot variations were caused by amino acid differences encoded by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Coding SNPs were validated by mass spectrometry, expressed sequence tag and 2D gel data. Coding SNPs can alter function of affected proteins and may thus represent a link between cultivar traits, proteome and genome. Proteome analysis of doubled haploid lines derived from a cross between a malting (Scarlett) and a feed cultivar (Meltan) enabled genetic localisation of protein phenotypes represented by 48 spot variations, involving e.g. peroxidases, serpins, α-amylase/trypsin inhibitors, peroxiredoxin and a small heat shock protein, in relation to markers on the chromosome map. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Studies in vitro on the effects of 1H,2H,4H(5H)-octafluorocyclohexane and 1H,4H(2H)-nonafluorocyclohexane on enzymes and organelles

A comparison has been made of the effect of 1H,2H,4H(5H)-octafluorocyclohexane, which is highly toxic (LD(50) 17mg./kg. in rats), and of 1H,4H(2H)-nonafluorocyclohexane, which is relatively non-toxic (LD(50)>440mg./kg. in rats), on the respiration of rat liver homogenates and mitochondria in vitro. 1H,2H,4H(5H)-Octafluorocyclohexane strongly inhibited the respiration of both homogenates and mitochondria, but neither compound had any significant effect on glycolysis or on glutamate dehydrogenase or NADH-cytochrome c reductase activity. 1H,2H,4H(5H)-Octafluorocyclohexane, however, caused a very marked inhibition of cytochrome oxidase activity, causing an almost complete lesion in this region of the respiratory chain. 1H,4H(2H)-Nonafluorocyclohexane was without effect in this respect. A marked decrease in turbidity of mitochondrial suspensions at 520nm. was caused by addition of both compounds, the effect being greater with 1H,2H,4H(5H)-octafluorocyclohexane. ATP, Mg(2+) and bovine serum albumin did not reverse these changes. Mitochondrial adenosine triphosphatase activity was increased twofold by the toxic compound, but only slightly by the non-toxic compound. Electron-microscopic examination of mitochondria treated with 1H,2H,4H(5H)-octafluorocyclohexane revealed gross morphological damage, whereas the effect of 1H,4H(2H)-nonafluorocyclohexane appeared to be merely to cause swelling. The results obtained account, to some extent at any rate, for the toxic effects of 1H,2H,4H(5H)-octafluorocyclohexane.     

Conformation and folding in histones H1 and H5

Denatured histones H1 and H5 can be readily refolded on salt addition. Their digestion by trypsin leads to limit peptides of about 80 residues having the same nmr and CD spectra as those of the intact parent histones. Scanning microcalorimetry shows that (1) the folded structures of H1 and H5 are located entirely in their limit peptides; (2) both have values of the specific denaturation enthalpy typical for small globular proteins; and that (3) both exhibit a classic “2-state” transition (ΔH = ΔH). The heat-denaturation profiles of H5 measured using intrinsic and extrinsic Cotton effect and side-chain nmr peaks do not coincide at all. Only the intrinsic Cotton effects give a T_m and ΔH close to that from microcalorimetry. We conclude that these proteins exhibit large-scale side-chain motions that precede the macroscopic cooperative transition.     

14N1H and 2H1H cross-relaxation in hydrated proteins.

The frequency dependence of the proton spin-lattice relaxation time T1 of solid hydrated bovine serum albumin and alpha-chymotrypsin has been measured over 4.5 decades in the range 10(4) to 3 X 10(8) Hz mainly by the aid of the field-cycling technique. The comparison between H2O- and D2O-hydrated samples permitted the distinction of exchangeable and unexchangeable protons. In all cases the 14N1H cross-relaxation dips due mainly to the amide groups have been observed. In addition, in the case of the deuterium exchanged proteins a 2H1H quadrupole dip appears. The amide groups act as relaxation sinks due to the coupling of the amide proton to 14N and adjacent protons. Outside of the dip regions the proton-proton coupling dominates. The fluctuations of the 14N1H and 1H1H interactions are of a different type. The unexchangeable protons show a T1 dispersion outside of the quadrupole dip regions given by the exceptional power law T1 approximately v0.75 +/- 0.05. It is shown that apart from structural information of the 14N spectra, 14N1H cross-relaxation spectroscopy permits the determination of correlation times in the range 10(-7) s less than tau less than 10(-4)S.     

Specific degradation of histones H1 and H3

It is shown that acid treated histones H1 and H3 are susceptible to specific degradation by an associated acid resistant protease. Dialysis against distilled water (pH 5.5–6) of the acid treated histones enhances proteolysis. On the other hand, no degradation is observed in nucleohistone either in the presence of Ca⁺⁺ or Na⁺⁺ ions. The conditions required to avoid degradation during nucleohistone and histone manipulation are described.     

Histones H1 and H4 of surface-spread meiotic chromosomes

The chromatin conformation of somatic and meiotic chromosomes is, at least in part, a function of electrostatic nucleosome interactions that are mediated by transient acetylation of the histone H4 N-terminal domain and phosphorylation of histone H1. The distribution of those histones in the chromatin of meiotic chromosomes is reported here. Antibodies to testis-specific histone 1, H1t, detect H1t in the chromatin of mouse meiotic prophase chromosomes only after synapsis and synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly is completed and before core separation is initiated. The H1t protein is evenly distributed over euchromatin, heterochromatin and the SC. Antibodies to acetylated lysine residues 5, 12 or 16 of histone H4, indicate that the euchromatin is more acetylated than the centromeric heterochromatin. The pattern is most pronounced for acetylated residue 5 and least for 16. Antibodies to phosphorylated H1 epitopes do not react with chromatin but, instead, recognize the chromosome cores and SCs. Possibly these are not phosphorylated histone H1 epitopes, but SC proteins with similar potentially phosphorylatable sequences such as KTPTK of the synaptic protein Syn1.     

Separation of nucleosomes containing histones H1 and H5

Hen erythrocyte chromatin was digested with staphylococcal nuclease and fractionated by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels. Instead of the three bands described for mouse carcinoma chromatin, four main discrete components (MN1, MN2, MN2E and MN3) were resolved in the mononucleosome fraction of erythrocyte chromatin. MN2 contained all five histones and a DNA fragment of 165–180 base pairs. MN2E comprised four nucleosomal histones plus histone H5 (but not H1) and a DNA fragment of 170–190 base pairs. The relatively nuclease resistant MN3 fraction of erythrocyte nucleosomes contained H1 but no H5 histone. A more accurate analysis of the MN2 fraction in mouse carcinoma nucleosomes revealed some additional microheterogeneity depending on the presence of two different subfractions of H1.     

Phylogenetic analysis of the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4.

Despite the ubiquity of histones in eukaryotes and their important role in determining the structure and function of chromatin, no detailed studies of the evolution of the histones have been reported. We have constructed phylogenetic trees for the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Histones which form dimers (H2A/H2B and H3/H4) have very similar trees and appear to have co-evolved, with the exception of the divergent sea urchin testis H2Bs, for which no corresponding divergent H2As have been identified. The trees for H2A and H2B also support the theory that animals and fungi have a common ancestor. H3 and H4 are 10-fold less divergent than H2A and H2B. Three evolutionary histories are observed for histone variants. H2A.F/Z-type variants arose once early in evolution, while H2A.X variants arose separately, during the evolution of multicellular animals. H3.3-type variants have arisen in multiple independent events.     

Exchange of histones H1, H2A, and H2B in vivo

We have asked whether histones synthesized in the absence of DNA synthesis can exchange into nucleosomal structures. DNA synthesis was inhibited by incubating hepatoma tissue culture cells in medium containing 5.0 mM hydroxyurea for 40 min. During the final 20 min, the cells were pulsed with [3H]lysine to radiolabel the histones (all five histones are substantially labeled under these conditions). By two electrophoretic techniques, we demonstrate that histones H1, H2A, and H2B synthesized in the presence of hydroxyurea do not merely associate with the surface of the chromatin but instead exchange with preexisting histones so that for the latter two histones there is incorporation into nucleosome structures. On the other hand, H3 and H4 synthesized during this same time period appear to be only weakly bound, if at all, to chromatin. These two histones have been isolated from postnuclear washes and purified. Some possible implications of in vivo exchange are discussed.     

Distribution of the core histones H2A.H2B.H3 and H4 during cell replication.

The distribution of newly synthesized core histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 relative to the DNA strand synthesized in the same generation has been examined in replicating Chinese Hamster ovary cells. Cells are grown for one generation in [14C]-lysine and thymidine, and then for one generation in [3H]-lysine and 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrUdRib) and a further generation in unlabeled lysine and thymidine. This protocol produces equal amounts of unifilarly substituted and unsubstituted DNA. Monomer nucleosomes isolated from chromatin containing these two types of DNA can be distinguished by crosslinking with formaldehyde and banding to equilibrium in CsCl density gradients. The results indicate that the core histones are equally distributed between the two types of DNA. These findings are discussed in terms of current models for chromatin replication; they do not support any long term association of newly replicated histones with either the leading or lagging side of the replication fork.