Functional SmpB-ribosome interactions require tmRNA

Small protein B (SmpB) is a requisite component of the transfer messenger RNA (tmRNA)-mediated bacterial translational quality control system known as trans-translation. The initial binding of tmRNA and its subsequent accommodation into the ribosomal A-site are activities intimately linked to SmpB protein function. From a mechanistic perspective, two key unanswered questions that require further investigation are: 1) what constitutes a stalled ribosome recognition complex and 2) does SmpB pre-bind ribosomes to recruit tmRNA. We have assessed, both in vivo and in vitro, the nature and stability of free SmpB interactions with stalled ribosomes and examined whether these interactions are functionally relevant. We present evidence to demonstrate that interaction of free SmpB with ribosomes is salt sensitive and significantly more labile than interaction of the SmpB.tmRNA complex with ribosomes. Upon dissociation of 70 S ribosomes SmpB partitions primarily with tmRNA rather than ribosomal subunits. This finding is consistent with biochemical and structural data demonstrating that tmRNA is the high-affinity binding partner of SmpB. Moreover, we show that under normal physiological conditions roughly similar numbers of SmpB and tmRNA molecules are present in cells. Our investigations also reveal that upon induction of a nonstop mRNA, SmpB is enriched in stalled ribosome fractions only in the presence of tmRNA. Based on these findings, we conclude that SmpB does not pre-bind stalled ribosome and that functional SmpB-stalled ribosome interactions require tmRNA. We propose that a 1:1:1 complex of SmpB.tmRNA.EF-Tu(GTP) recognizes and binds a stalled ribosome to initiate trans-translation.     

Stepping transfer messenger RNA through the ribosome

tmRNA (transfer messenger RNA) is a unique molecule used by all bacteria to rescue stalled ribosomes and to mark unfinished peptides with a specific degradation signal. tmRNA is recruited by arrested ribosomes in which it facilitates the translational switch from cellular mRNA to the mRNA part of tmRNA. Small protein B (SmpB) is a key partner for the trans-translation activity of tmRNA both in vivo and in vitro. It was shown that SmpB acts at the initiation step of the trans-translation process by facilitating tmRNA aminoacylation and binding to the ribosome. Little is known about the subsequent steps of trans-translation. Here we demonstrated the first example of an investigation of tmRNA.ribosome complexes at different stages of trans-translation. Our results show that the structural element at the position of tmRNA pseudoknot 3 remains intact during the translation of the mRNA module of tmRNA and that it is localized on the surface of the ribosome. At least one SmpB molecule remains bound to a ribosome.tmRNA complex isolated from the cell when translation is blocked at different positions within the mRNA part of tmRNA.     

反式翻译模型

反式翻译是细菌体内一种修复翻译水平上受阻的遗传信息表达过程的机制。tmRNA是反式翻译的核心分子,它兼具tRNA和mRNA的特点,在SmpB蛋白的帮助下特异性识别携带mRNA缺失体的核糖体,在核糖体蛋白S1的传递作用下结合在A位点上,一方面延续被中断的mRNA上的遗传信息,一方面终止蛋白质的合成,释放被束缚的核糖体和tRNA进入新的翻译过程。本文对近年来关于反式翻译模型的研究进行综述。     

Structure probing of tmRNA in distinct stages of trans-translation

Ribosomes stalled on problematic mRNAs in bacterial cells can be rescued by transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), its helper protein (small protein B, SmpB), and elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) through a mechanism called trans-translation. In this work we used lead(II) footprinting to probe the interactions of tmRNA with SmpB and other components of the translation machinery at different steps of the trans-translation cycle. Ribosomes with a short nascent peptide stalled on a truncated mRNA were reacted with Ala-tmRNA*EF-Tu*GTP, SmpB, and other translation components to initiate and execute trans-translation. Free tmRNA was probed with lead(II) acetate with and without SmpB, and ribosome bound tmRNA was probed in one of four different trans-translation states stabilized by antibiotic addition or selective exclusion of translation components. For comparison, we also analyzed lead(II) cleavage patterns of tmRNA in vivo in a wild-type as well as in an SmpB-deficient Escherichia coli strain. We observed some specific cleavages/protections in tmRNA for the individual steps of trans-translation, but the overall tmRNA conformation appeared to be similar in the stages analyzed. Our findings suggest that, in vivo, a dominant fraction of tmRNA is in complex with SmpB and that, in vitro, SmpB remains tmRNA bound at the initial steps of trans-translation.     

Simultaneous and functional binding of SmpB and EF-Tu-TP to the alanyl acceptor arm of tmRNA.

Transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) mimics functions of aminoacyl-tRNA and mRNA, subsequently, when rescuing stalled ribosomes on a 3' truncated mRNA without stop codon in bacteria. In addition, this mechanism marks prematurely terminated proteins by a C-terminal peptide tag as a signal for degradation by specific cellular proteases. For Escherichia coli, previous studies on initial steps of this "trans-translation" mechanism revealed that tmRNA alanylation by Ala-tRNA synthetase and binding of Ala-tmRNA by EF-Tu-GTP for subsequent delivery to stalled ribosomes are inefficient when compared to analogous reactions with canonical tRNA(Ala). In other studies, protein SmpB and ribosomal protein S1 appeared to bind directly to tmRNA and to be indispensable for trans-translation. Here, we have searched for additional and synergistic effects of the latter two on tmRNA alanylation and its subsequent binding to EF-Tu-GTP. Kinetic analysis of functioning combined with band-shift experiments and structural probing demonstrate, that tmRNA may indeed form a multimeric complex with SmpB, S1 and EF-Tu-GTP, which leads to a considerably enhanced efficiency of the initial steps of trans-translation. Whereas S1 binds to the mRNA region of tmRNA, we have found that SmpB and EF-Tu both interact with its acceptor arm region. Interaction with SmpB and EF-Tu was also observed at the acceptor arm of Ala-tRNA(Ala), but there the alanylation efficiency was inhibited rather than stimulated by SmpB. Therefore, SmpB may function as an essential modulator of the tRNA-like acceptor arm of tmRNA during its successive steps in trans-translation.     

The role of SmpB and the ribosomal decoding center in licensing tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes

In bacteria, stalled ribosomes are recycled by a hybrid transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA). Like tRNA, tmRNA is aminoacylated with alanine and is delivered to the ribosome by EF-Tu, where it reacts with the growing polypeptide chain. tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes poses a challenge to our understanding of ribosome function because it occurs in the absence of a codon-anticodon interaction. Instead, tmRNA entry is licensed by the binding of its protein partner, SmpB, to the ribosomal decoding center. We analyzed a series of SmpB mutants and found that its C-terminal tail is essential for tmRNA accommodation but not for EF-Tu activation. We obtained evidence that the tail likely functions as a helix on the ribosome to promote accommodation and identified key residues in the tail essential for this step. In addition, our mutational analysis points to a role for the conserved K(131)GKK tail residues in trans-translation after peptidyl transfer to tmRNA, presumably EF-G-mediated translocation or translation of the tmRNA template. Surprisingly, analysis of A1492, A1493, and G530 mutants reveals that while these ribosomal nucleotides are essential for normal tRNA selection, they play little to no role in peptidyl transfer to tmRNA. These studies clarify how SmpB interacts with the ribosomal decoding center to license tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes.     

Physiology of tmRNA: what gets tagged and why?

Transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) enters stalled translational complexes and, with small protein B (SmpB), mediates peptide tagging of the nascent protein and release of the stalled ribosome. Recent studies clarify how the tmRNA system is targeted to ribosomes and suggest that tmRNA-tagging is used for both quality control and specific regulation of cellular physiology.     

Dial tm for rescue: tmRNA engages ribosomes stalled on defective mRNAs

Ribosomes translate genetic information encoded by mRNAs into protein chains with high fidelity. Truncated mRNAs lacking a stop codon will cause the synthesis of incomplete peptide chains and stall translating ribosomes. In bacteria, a ribonucleoprotein complex composed of tmRNA, a molecule that combines the functions of tRNAs and mRNAs, and small protein B (SmpB) rescues stalled ribosomes. The SmpB-tmRNA complex binds to the stalled ribosome, allowing translation to resume at a short internal tmRNA open reading frame that encodes a protein degradation tag. The aberrant protein is released when the ribosome reaches the stop codon at the end of the tmRNA open reading frame and the fused peptide tag targets it for degradation by cellular proteases. The recently determined NMR structures of SmpB, the crystal structure of the SmpB-tmRNA complex and the cryo-EM structure of the SmpB-tmRNA-EF-Tu-ribosome complex have provided first detailed insights into the intricate mechanisms involved in ribosome rescue.     

Novel factor rescues ribosomes trapped on non-stop mRNAs

Ribosomes are trapped at the 3′ ends of mRNAs that lack a natural stop codon. In bacteria, a reaction called trans-translation recycles ribosomes entrapped at such ‘non-stop’ mRNAs. The main player in trans-translation is tmRNA (SsrA-RNA), a bi-functional RNA that acts as both a tRNA and an mRNA. In the trans-translation reaction, alanine-charged tmRNA loads at the ribosomal A-site and translation shifts to the resume codon in tmRNA. Translation of tmRNA stops at a natural stop codon at the end of the small reading frame of tmRNA. In this way, the reaction simultaneously adds a peptide tag to the end of the nascent, incomplete polypeptide and recycles the stalled ribosomes. The peptide tag is recognized by cellular proteases that rapidly degrade the incomplete, potentially harmful polypeptides. The trans-translation reaction is not essential in most bacteria, raising the possibility that ribosomes stalled at non-stop mRNAs can be rescued by alternative routes. In this issue of Molecular Microbiology, Chadani et al. show that a novel translation factor, ArfA, can recycle a ribosome trapped at the 3′ end of a non-stop mRNA in the absence of trans-translation. AfrA is essential in the absence of tmRNA, showing that the two systems work in parallel to resolve stalled ribosomes.     

The role of SmpB protein in trans-translation

The function of SmpB protein in the trans-translation system was evaluated using the well-defined cell-free translation system consisting of purified ribosome, alanyl-tRNA synthetase and elongation factors. The analysis showed that SmpB protein enhances alanine-accepting activity of tmRNA and that SmpB protein and tmRNA are sufficient to complete the trans-translation process in the presence of translational components. Moreover, SmpB is indispensable in the addition of tag-peptide onto ribosomes by tmRNA. In particular, the A-site binding of tmRNA is inhibited in the absence of SmpB.     

tmRNA-SmpB: a journey to the centre of the bacterial ribosome

Ribosomes mediate protein synthesis by decoding the information carried by messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and catalysing peptide bond formation between amino acids. When bacterial ribosomes stall on incomplete messages, the trans-translation quality control mechanism is activated by the transfer-messenger RNA bound to small protein B (tmRNA-SmpB ribonucleoprotein complex). Trans-translation liberates the stalled ribosomes and triggers degradation of the incomplete proteins. Here, we present the cryo-electron microscopy structures of tmRNA-SmpB accommodated or translocated into stalled ribosomes. Two atomic models for each state are proposed. This study reveals how tmRNA-SmpB crosses the ribosome and how, as the problematic mRNA is ejected, the tmRNA resume codon is placed onto the ribosomal decoding site by new contacts between SmpB and the nucleotides upstream of the tag-encoding sequence. This provides a structural basis for the transit of the large tmRNA-SmpB complex through the ribosome and for the means by which the tmRNA internal frame is set for translation to resume.     

tmRNA and associated ligands: a puzzling relationship

Translation is an efficient and accurate mechanism, needing thorough systems of control-quality to ensure the correspondence between the information carried by the messenger RNA (mRNA) and the newly synthesized protein. Among them, trans-translation ensures delivering of stalled ribosomes when translation occurs on truncated mRNAs in bacteria, followed by the degradation of the incomplete nascent proteins. This process requires transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), an original molecule acting as both a tRNA and an mRNA. tmRNA first enters the decoding site of stuck ribosomes and, despite the lack of any codon-anticodon interaction, acts as a tRNA by transferring its alanine to the incomplete protein. Translation then switches to a small internal coding sequence (mRNA domain), which encodes a tag directing the incomplete protein towards degradation. Although playing a central role during trans-translation, tmRNA function depends on associated proteins. Genetic, biochemical and recent structural data are starting to unravel how the process takes place, by involving three main protein partners. Small protein B (SmpB) interacts with the tRNA-like domain (TLD) of tmRNA and is indispensable and specific to the process. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) binds simultaneously the TLD and brings aminoacylated tmRNA to the ribosome, as for canonical tRNAs. Ribosomal protein S1 forms complexes with tmRNA, facilitating its recruitment by the stalled ribosomes. The chronology of events, however, is poorly understood and recent data shed light on the functions attributed to the proteins involved in trans-translation. This review focuses on the puzzling relationship that tmRNA has with these three protein ligands, putting forward trans-translation as a highly dynamical process.     

Fluorescence characterization of the transfer RNA-like domain of transfer messenger RNA in complex with small binding protein B

Transfer messenger RNA (tmRNA) and small binding protein B (SmpB) are the main components of the trans-translation rescue machinery that releases stalled ribosomes from defective mRNAs. Little is known about how SmpB binding affects the conformation of the tRNA-like domain (TLD) of tmRNA. It has been previously hypothesized that the absence of a D stem in the TLD provides flexibility in the elbow region of tmRNA, which can be stabilized by its interaction with SmpB. Here, we have used F?rster resonance energy transfer to characterize the global structure of the tRNA-like domain of tmRNA in the presence and absence of SmpB and as a function of Mg(2+) concentration. Our results show tight and specific binding of SmpB to tmRNA. Surprisingly, our data show that the global conformation and flexibility of tmRNA do not change upon SmpB binding. However, Mg(2+) ions induce an 11 ? compaction in the tmRNA structure, suggesting that the flexibility in the H2a stem may allow different conformations of tmRNA as the TLD and mRNA-like domain need to be positioned differently while moving through the ribosome.     

Single molecule imaging of the trans-translation entry process via anchoring of the tagged ribosome

Trans-translation is an eubacterial quality control system to rescue the stalled ribosome, in which multiple components such as transfer messenger RNA (tmRNA) and Small protein B (SmpB) are involved. However, how these molecules interact with ribosome remains elusive. Here, we report the single molecule analysis of the trans-translation process. We developed a new method to label the functional ribosome, in which a tag protein (the HaloTag protein of 297 amino acids) was fused to the 30S ribosomal protein S2 and covalently labelled with specific ligand (HaloTag ligand), resulting in the stable and specific labelling of ribosome. Ribosomes were anchored onto the glass surface using biotinylated derivative of the Cy3 HaloTag ligand (i.e. biotin-Cy3-ligand), and real-time interactions of Cy5-tmRNA/SmpB/EF-Tu ternary complexes with anchored ribosomes are observed as a model of the trans-translation entry. Statistical analysis revealed that Cy5-tmRNA/SmpB/EF-Tu ternary complexes bind to the anchored ribosome with the second-order rate constant of 2.6 × 10(6) (1/M/s) and tmRNAs undergo multi-modal pathway before release from ribosome. The methods presented here are also applicable to the analysis for general translation processes.     

In vitro trans-translation of Thermus thermophilus: ribosomal protein S1 is not required for the early stage of trans-translation

Transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) plays a dual role as a tRNA and an mRNA in trans-translation, during which the ribosome replaces mRNA with tmRNA encoding the tag-peptide. These processes have been suggested to involve several tmRNA-binding proteins, including SmpB and ribosomal protein S1. To investigate the molecular mechanism of trans-translation, we developed in vitro systems using purified ribosome, elongation factors, tmRNA and SmpB from Thermus thermophilus. A stalled ribosome in complex with polyphenylalanyl-tRNA(Phe) was prepared as a target of tmRNA. A peptidyl transfer reaction from polyphenylalanyl-tRNA(Phe) to alanyl-tmRNA was observed in an SmpB-dependent manner. The next peptidyl transfer to aminoacyl-tRNA occurred specifically to the putative resume codon for the tag-peptide, which was confirmed by introducing a mutation in the codon. Thus, the in vitro systems developed in this study are useful to investigate the early steps of trans-translation. Using these in vitro systems, we investigated the function of ribosomal protein S1, which has been believed to play a role in trans-translation. Although T. thermophilus S1 tightly bound to tmRNA, as in the case of Escherichia coli S1, it had little or no effect on the early steps of trans-translation.     

SmpB Contributes to Reading Frame Selection in the Translation of Transfer-Messenger RNA

Transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) acts first as a tRNA and then as an mRNA template to rescue stalled ribosomes in eubacteria. Together with its protein partner, SmpB (small protein B), tmRNA enters stalled ribosomes and transfers an Ala residue to the growing polypeptide chain. A remarkable step then occurs: the ribosome leaves the stalled mRNA and resumes translation using tmRNA as a template, adding a short peptide tag that destines the aborted protein for destruction. Exactly how the ribosome switches templates, resuming translation on tmRNA in the proper reading frame, remains unknown. Within the tmRNA sequence itself, five nucleotides (U85AGUC) immediately upstream of the first codon appear to direct frame selection. In particular, mutation of the conserved A86 results in severe loss of function both in vitro and in vivo. The A86C mutation causes translation to resume exclusively in the + 1 frame. Several candidate binding partners for this upstream sequence have been identified in vitro. Using a genetic selection for tmRNA activity in Escherichia coli, we identified mutations in the SmpB protein that restore the function of A86C tmRNA in vivo. The SmpB mutants increase tagging in the normal reading frame and reduce tagging in the + 1 frame. These results demonstrate that SmpB is functionally linked with the sequence upstream of the tmRNA template; both contribute to reading frame selection on tmRNA.     

SmpB triggers GTP hydrolysis of elongation factor Tu on ribosomes by compensating for the lack of codon-anticodon interaction during trans-translation initiation

Bacterial tmRNA rescues ribosomes that stall because of defective mRNAs via the trans-translation process. Although entry of the charged transfer messenger RNA (tmRNA) into the ribosome proceeded in the absence of elongation factor (EF-Tu) and in the presence of EF-Tu and the antibiotic kirromycin, evidence was found for the involvement of EF-Tu in trans-translation initiation. The polyalanine synthesis system attained by using a tmRNA variant consisting of only the tRNA-like domain revealed that it was completely dependent on the presence of SmpB and greatly enhanced by EF-Tu and EF-G. Actually, ribosome-dependent GTPase activity of EF-Tu was stimulated by the addition of SmpB and tmRNA but independently of template mRNA, demonstrating that SmpB compensates for the lack of codon-anticodon interaction during the first step of the trans-translation initiation. Based on these results, we suggest that SmpB structurally mimics the anticodon arm of tRNA and elicits GTP hydrolysis of EF-Tu upon tmRNA accommodation in the A site of the ribosome.     

Rejection of tmRNA·SmpB after GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu on ribosomes stalled on intact mRNA

Messenger RNAs lacking a stop codon trap ribosomes at their 3′ ends, depleting the pool of ribosomes available for protein synthesis. In bacteria, a remarkable quality control system rescues and recycles stalled ribosomes in a process known as trans-translation. Acting as a tRNA, transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) is aminoacylated, delivered by EF-Tu to the ribosomal A site, and accepts the nascent polypeptide. Translation then resumes on a reading frame within tmRNA, encoding a short peptide tag that targets the nascent peptide for degradation by proteases. One unsolved issue in trans-translation is how tmRNA and its protein partner SmpB preferentially recognize stalled ribosomes and not actively translating ones. Here, we examine the effect of the length of the 3′ extension of mRNA on each step of trans-translation by pre-steady-state kinetic methods and fluorescence polarization binding assays. Unexpectedly, EF-Tu activation and GTP hydrolysis occur rapidly regardless of the length of the mRNA, although the peptidyl transfer to tmRNA decreases as the mRNA 3′ extension increases and the tmRNA·SmpB binds less tightly to the ribosome with an mRNA having a long 3′ extension. From these results, we conclude that the tmRNA·SmpB complex dissociates during accommodation due to competition between the downstream mRNA and the C-terminal tail for the mRNA channel. Rejection of the tmRNA·SmpB complex during accommodation is reminiscent of the rejection of near-cognate tRNA from the ribosome in canonical translation.     

Various effects of paromomycin on tmRNA-directed trans-translation

trans-Translation is an unusual translation in which tmRNA plays a dual function as a tRNA and an mRNA to relieve the stalled translation on the ribosome. In this study, we examined the effects of an aminoglycoside antibiotic, paromomycin, on several tmRNA-related events in vitro. The results of a chemical footprinting study indicated that paromomycin molecules bind tmRNA at G332/G333 in the tRNA domain and A316 in the middle of the long helix between tRNA and mRNA domains. Paromomycin bound at G332/G333 inhibited aminoacylation, and the inhibition was suppressed by the addition of SmpB, a tmRNA-binding protein. It was also found that paromomycin causes a shift of the translation resuming point on tmRNA by -1. The effect on initiation shift was canceled by a mutation at the paromomycin-binding site in 16 S rRNA but not by mutations in tmRNA. A high concentration of paromomycin inhibited trans-translation, whereas it enhanced the initiation-shifted trans-translation when SmpB was exogenously added or a mutation was introduced at 333. The effect of paromomycin on trans-translation differs substantially from that on canonical translation, in which it induces miscoding by modulating the A site of the decoding helix of the small subunit RNA of the ribosome.     

Alternative fates of paused ribosomes during translation termination

The bacterial tmRNA·SmpB system facilitates recycling of stalled translational complexes in a process termed "ribosome rescue." During ribosome rescue, the nascent chain is tagged with the tmRNA-encoded ssrA peptide, which targets the tagged polypeptide for degradation. Translational pausing also induces a variety of recoding events such as frameshifts, ribosome hops, and stop codon readthrough. To examine the interplay between recoding and ribosome rescue, we determined the various fates of ribosomes that pause during translation termination. We expressed a model protein containing the C-terminal Asp-Pro nascent peptide motif (which interferes with translation termination) and quantified the protein chains produced by recoding and ssrA-peptide tagging. The nature and extent of translational recoding depended upon the codon for the C-terminal Pro residue, with CCU and CCC promoting efficient +1 frameshifting. In contrast, ssrA-peptide tagging was unaffected by C-terminal Pro coding. Moreover, +1 frameshifting was not suppressed by tmRNA·SmpB activity, suggesting that recoding and ribosome rescue are not competing events. However, cells lacking ribosomal protein L9 (ΔL9) exhibited a significant increase in recoding and a concomitant decrease in ssrA-peptide tagging. Pulse-chase analysis revealed that pre-termination ribosomes turn over more rapidly in ΔL9 cells, suggesting that increased recoding alleviates the translational arrest. Together, these results indicate that tmRNA·SmpB does not suppress transient ribosome pauses, but responds to prolonged translational arrest.