TopBP1 functions with 53BP1 in the G1 DNA damage checkpoint

TopBP1 is a checkpoint protein that colocalizes with ATR at sites of DNA replication stress. In this study, we show that TopBP1 also colocalizes with 53BP1 at sites of DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs), but only in the G1‐phase of the cell cycle. Recruitment of TopBP1 to sites of DNA replication stress was dependent on BRCT domains 1–2 and 7–8, whereas recruitment to sites of DNA DSBs was dependent on BRCT domains 1–2 and 4–5. The BRCT domains 4–5 interacted with 53BP1 and recruitment of TopBP1 to sites of DNA DSBs in G1 was dependent on 53BP1. As TopBP1 contains a domain important for ATR activation, we examined whether it contributes to the G1 cell cycle checkpoint. By monitoring the entry of irradiated G1 cells into S‐phase, we observed a checkpoint defect after siRNA‐mediated depletion of TopBP1, 53BP1 or ATM. Thus, TopBP1 may mediate the checkpoint function of 53BP1 in G1.     

北京地区宫颈癌HPV16上游调控序列、E6、E7癌基因序列初步分析

为检测HPV16上游调控序列(Upstream regulatory region, URR)、E6、E7癌基因变异在北京地区宫颈癌患者癌组织中的分布特征, 探讨该地区宫颈癌发生同HPV16变异株间的相关性, 文章以提取的31例HPV16检测阳性宫颈癌组织DNA为模板, 设计针对性引物扩增URR、E6、E7 3个目的片段, PCR产物直接测序并通过GenBank对比分析变异和分支鉴定情况。在所分析的宫颈癌组织中, URR是突变频率最高的片段, 其次为E7, 最保守的序列为E6。共发现热突变位点8个, 分别为URR序列上G7521A(100%)、C7435G(96.77%)、C24T(45.16%)、A7729C(45.16%)、G7839A(45.16%); E6序列上T178G(41.94%); E7序列上A647G(45.16%)、T846C(45.16%)。HPV16分支分布频率最广的是As型(54.84%), 其次为E型(45.16%)。研究结果提示, HPV16URR序列上G7521A、A7729C、G7839A, E6序列上T178G、T350G, E7序列上A647G、G658A等位点的变异可能与病毒致癌潜能及宫颈癌的发生相关。北京地区宫颈癌患者中As和E型可能是两种最主要的HPV16分支, 这有可能会为HPV疫苗的研制和感染治疗提供有价值的信息。As型和E型病毒在不同年龄组和不同肿瘤分期组的患者中分布频率有差异, 这可能会为揭示宫颈癌年轻化趋势提供新的线索。     

Residual Cdk1/2 activity after DNA damage promotes senescence

In response to DNA damage, a cell can be forced to permanently exit the cell cycle and become senescent. Senescence provides an early barrier against tumor development by preventing proliferation of cells with damaged DNA. By studying single cells, we show that Cdk activity persists after DNA damage until terminal cell cycle exit. This low level of Cdk activity not only allows cell cycle progression, but also promotes cell cycle exit at a decision point in G2 phase. We find that residual Cdk1/2 activity is required for efficient p21 production, allowing for nuclear sequestration of Cyclin B1, subsequent APC/C^Cdh1‐dependent degradation of mitotic inducers and induction of senescence. We suggest that the same activity that triggers mitosis in an unperturbed cell cycle enforces senescence in the presence of DNA damage, ensuring a robust response when most needed.     

Phospho-Bcl-xL(Ser62) plays a key role at DNA damage-induced G2 checkpoint

Accumulating evidence suggests that Bcl-xL, an anti-apoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family, also functions in cell cycle progression and cell cycle checkpoints. Analysis of a series of phosphorylation site mutants reveals that cells expressing Bcl-xL(Ser62Ala) mutant are less stable at the G₂ checkpoint and enter mitosis more rapidly than cells expressing wild-type Bcl-xL or Bcl-xL phosphorylation site mutants, including Thr41Ala, Ser43Ala, Thr47Ala, Ser56Ala and Thr115Ala. Analysis of the dynamic phosphorylation and location of phospho-Bcl-xL(Ser62) in unperturbed, synchronized cells and during DNA damage-induced G₂ arrest discloses that a pool of phospho-Bcl-xL(Ser62) accumulates into nucleolar structures in etoposide-exposed cells during G₂ arrest. In a series of in vitro kinase assays, pharmacological inhibitors and specific siRNAs experiments, we found that Polo kinase 1 and MAPK9/JNK2 are major protein kinases involved in Bcl-xL(Ser62) phosphorylation and accumulation into nucleolar structures during the G₂ checkpoint. In nucleoli, phospho-Bcl-xL(Ser62) binds to and co-localizes with Cdk1(cdc2), the key cyclin-dependent kinase required for entry into mitosis. These data indicate that during G₂ checkpoint, phospho-Bcl-xL(Ser62) stabilizes G₂ arrest by timely trapping of Cdk1(cdc2) in nucleolar structures to slow mitotic entry. It also highlights that DNA damage affects the dynamic composition of the nucleolus, which now emerges as a piece of the DNA damage response.     

Loss of p53 induces M-phase retardation following G2 DNA damage checkpoint abrogation

Most cell lines that lack functional p53 protein are arrested in the G2 phase of the cell cycle due to DNA damage. When the G2 checkpoint is abrogated, these cells are forced into mitotic catastrophe. A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells, in which p53 was eliminated with the HPV16 E6 gene, exhibited efficient arrest in the G2 phase when treated with adriamycin. Administration of caffeine to G2-arrested cells induced a drastic change in cell phenotype, the nature of which depended on the status of p53. Flow cytometric and microscopic observations revealed that cells that either contained or lacked p53 resumed their cell cycles and entered mitosis upon caffeine treatment. However, transit to the M phase was slower in p53-negative cells than in p53-positive cells. Consistent with these observations, CDK1 activity was maintained at high levels, along with stable cyclin B1, in p53-negative cells. The addition of butyrolactone I, which is an inhibitor of CDK1 and CDK2, to the p53-negative cells reduced the floating round cell population and induced the disappearance of cyclin B1. These results suggest a relationship between the p53 pathway and the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of mitotic cyclins and possible cross-talk between the G2-DNA damage checkpoint and the mitotic checkpoint.     

Phospho-Bcl-xL(Ser62) plays a key role at DNA damage-induced G2 checkpoint

Accumulating evidence suggests that Bcl-xL, an anti-apoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family, also functions in cell cycle progression and cell cycle checkpoints. Analysis of a series of phosphorylation site mutants reveals that cells expressing Bcl-xL(Ser62Ala) mutant are less stable at the G₂ checkpoint and enter mitosis more rapidly than cells expressing wild-type Bcl-xL or Bcl-xL phosphorylation site mutants, including Thr41Ala, Ser43Ala, Thr47Ala, Ser56Ala and Thr115Ala. Analysis of the dynamic phosphorylation and location of phospho-Bcl-xL(Ser62) in unperturbed, synchronized cells and during DNA damage-induced G₂ arrest discloses that a pool of phospho-Bcl-xL(Ser62) accumulates into nucleolar structures in etoposide-exposed cells during G₂ arrest. In a series of in vitro kinase assays, pharmacological inhibitors and specific siRNAs experiments, we found that Polo kinase 1 and MAPK9/JNK2 are major protein kinases involved in Bcl-xL(Ser62) phosphorylation and accumulation into nucleolar structures during the G₂ checkpoint. In nucleoli, phospho-Bcl-xL(Ser62) binds to and co-localizes with Cdk1(cdc2), the key cyclin-dependent kinase required for entry into mitosis. These data indicate that during G₂ checkpoint, phospho-Bcl-xL(Ser62) stabilizes G₂ arrest by timely trapping of Cdk1(cdc2) in nucleolar structures to slow mitotic entry. It also highlights that DNA damage affects the dynamic composition of the nucleolus, which now emerges as a piece of the DNA damage response.     

Stranglehold on the spindle assembly checkpoint: the human papillomavirus E2 protein provokes BUBR1-dependent aneuploidy

The Human Papillomavirus (HPV) E2 protein, which inhibits the E6 and E7 viral oncogenes, is believed to have anti-oncogenic properties. Here, we challenge this view and show that HPV-18 E2 over-activates the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) and induces DNA breaks in mitosis followed by aneuploidy. This phenotype is associated with interaction of E2 with the Mitotic Checkpoint Complex (MCC) proteins Cdc20, MAD2 and BUBR1. While BUBR1 silencing rescues the mitotic phenotype induced by E2, p53 silencing or presence of E6/E7 (inactivating p53 and increasing BUBR1 levels respectively) both amplify it. This work pinpoints E2 as a key protein in the initiation of HPV-induced cervical cancer and identifies the SAC as a target for oncogenic pathogens. Moreover, our results suggest a role of p53 in regulating the mitotic process itself and highlight SAC over-activation in a p53-negative context as a highly pathogenic event.     

Enhancement of immunogenicity of HPV16 E7 oncogene by fusion with E. coli beta-glucuronidase

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E7 is an unstable oncoprotein with low immunogenicity. In previous work, we prepared the E7GGG gene containing point mutations resulting in substitution of three amino acids in the pRb-binding site of the HPV16 E7 protein. METHODS AND RESULTS: To increase E7GGG immunogenicity we constructed fusion genes of E. coli beta-glucuronidase (GUS) with one or three copies of E7GGG. Furthermore, a similar construct was prepared with partial E7GGG (E7GGGp, 41 amino acids from the N-terminus). The expression of the fusion genes was examined in human 293T cells. Quantification of GUS activity and the amount of E7 antigen showed substantially reduced GUS activity of fusion proteins with complete E7GGG that was mainly caused by decrease of their steady-state level in comparison with GUS or E7GGGpGUS. Still, the steady-state level of E7GGG.GUS was about 20-fold higher than that of the E7GGG protein. The immunogenicity of the fusion genes with complete E7GGG was tested by DNA immunisation of C57BL/6 mice with a gene gun. TC-1 cells and their clone TC-1/A9 with down-regulated MHC class I expression were subcutaneously (s.c.) inoculated to induce tumour formation. All mice were protected against challenge with TC-1 cells and most animals remained tumour-free in therapeutic-immunisation experiments with these cells, in contrast to immunisation with unfused E7GGG and the fusion with the lysosome-associated membrane protein 1 (Sig/E7GGG/LAMP-1). Significant protection was also recorded against TC-1/A9 cells. Both tetramer staining and ELISPOT assay showed substantially higher activation of E7-specific CD8+ lymphocytes in comparison with E7GGG and Sig/E7GGG/LAMP-1. Deletion of 231 bp in the GUS gene eliminated enzymatic activity, but did not influence the immunogenicity of the E7GGG.GUS gene. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate the superior immunisation efficacy of the fusion genes of E7GGG with GUS when compared with E7GGG and Sig/E7GGG/LAMP-1. The E7GGG.GUS-based DNA vaccine might also be efficient against human tumour cells with reduced MHC class I expression.     

HPV18 E7致癌蛋白的高效表达、纯化和鉴定

目的为进一步研究人乳头状瘤病毒18（Human papillomavirus18,HPV18）E7蛋白的结构与功能。方法构建HPV18 E7的谷胱甘肽S-转移酶融合蛋白质粒pGEX-6P-1-GST-HPV18 E7,重组质粒转入大肠埃希菌BL21进行可溶性融合蛋白的高效表达。结果柱上切除法去除GST标签,表达产物经glutathione Sepharose 4B亲和层析纯化,获得了SDS-PAGE和HPLC-ESI-MS纯度的HPV18 E7均质蛋白,非变性PAGE和凝胶过滤表明HPV18 E7以稳定的单体形式存在于水溶液中。高压液相色谱-电喷雾质谱（HPLC-ESI-MS）分析得到HPV18 E7精确分子量为12865．0 Da,与其理论值吻合。纯化蛋白经HPLC-ESI-MS／MS鉴定为目的产物,鉴定出的9个匹配肽段覆盖率为HPV18 E7整个氨基酸序列的96．5％。结论本文所建立的技术可以有效地大量制备HPV18 E7,为进一步研究其结构与功能和致癌机制奠定了重要的物质基础。     

Cutting edge: Chk1 directs senescence and mitotic catastrophe in recovery from G2 checkpoint arrest

Besides the well‐understood DNA damage response via establishment of G₂ checkpoint arrest, novel studies focus on the recovery from arrest by checkpoint override to monitor cell cycle re‐entry. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of Chk1 in the recovery from G₂ checkpoint arrest in HCT116 (human colorectal cancer) wt, p53^–/– and p21^–/– cell lines following H₂O₂ treatment. Firstly, DNA damage caused G₂ checkpoint activation via Chk1. Secondly, overriding G₂ checkpoint led to (i) mitotic slippage, cell cycle re‐entry in G₁ and subsequent G₁ arrest associated with senescence or (ii) premature mitotic entry in the absence of p53/p21^WAF1 causing mitotic catastrophe. We revealed subtle differences in the initial Chk1‐involved G₂ arrest with respect to p53/p21^WAF1: absence of either protein led to late G₂ arrest instead of the classic G₂ arrest during checkpoint initiation, and this impacted the release back into the cell cycle. Thus, G₂ arrest correlated with downstream senescence, but late G₂ arrest led to mitotic catastrophe, although both cell cycle re‐entries were linked to upstream Chk1 signalling. Chk1 knockdown deciphered that Chk1 defines long‐term DNA damage responses causing cell cycle re‐entry. We propose that recovery from oxidative DNA damage‐induced G₂ arrest requires Chk1. It works as cutting edge and navigates cells to senescence or mitotic catastrophe. The decision, however, seems to depend on p53/p21^WAF1. The general relevance of Chk1 as an important determinant of recovery from G₂ checkpoint arrest was verified in HT29 colorectal cancer cells.     

DNA resection proteins Sgs1 and Exo1 are required for G1 checkpoint activation in budding yeast

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) in budding yeast trigger activation of DNA damage checkpoints, allowing repair to occur. Although resection is necessary for initiating damage-induced cell cycle arrest in G2, no role has been assigned to it in the activation of G1 checkpoint. Here we demonstrate for the first time that the resection proteins Sgs1 and Exo1 are required for efficient G1 checkpoint activation. We find in G1 arrested cells that histone H2A phosphorylation in response to ionizing radiation is independent of Sgs1 and Exo1. In contrast, these proteins are required for damage-induced recruitment of Rfa1 to the DSB sites, phosphorylation of the Rad53 effector kinase, cell cycle arrest and RNR3 expression. Checkpoint activation in G1 requires the catalytic activity of Sgs1, suggesting that it is DNA resection mediated by Sgs1 that stimulates the damage response pathway rather than protein–protein interactions with other DDR proteins. Together, these results implicate DNA resection, which is thought to be minimal in G1, as necessary for activation of the G1 checkpoint.     

Wip1 confers G2 checkpoint recovery competence by counteracting p53‐dependent transcriptional repression

Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint causes a cell‐cycle arrest through inhibition of cyclin‐dependent kinases (cdks). To successfully recover from the arrest, a cell should somehow be maintained in its proper cell‐cycle phase. This problem is particularly eminent when a cell arrests in G2, as cdk activity is important to establish a G2 state. Here, we identify the phosphatase Wip1 (PPM1D) as a factor that maintains a cell competent for cell‐cycle re‐entry during an ongoing DNA damage response in G2. We show that Wip1 function is required throughout the arrest, and that Wip1 acts by antagonizing p53‐dependent repression of crucial mitotic inducers, such as Cyclin B and Plk1. Our data show that the primary function of Wip1 is to retain cellular competence to divide, rather than to silence the checkpoint to promote recovery. Our findings uncover Wip1 as a first in class recovery competence gene, and suggest that the principal function of Wip1 in cellular transformation is to retain proliferative capacity in the face of oncogene‐induced stress.     

Mutation in the immunodominant epitope of the HPV16 E7 oncoprotein as a mechanism of tumor escape

Infection with high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) can cause the development of malignant tumors. To study mechanisms responsible for immune escape of tumor cells infected with HPV16, we previously used mouse oncogenic TC-1 cells producing HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins to derive TC-1 clones resistant to immunization against E7. We have found immunoresistance of the clones to correlate with the point mutation in the E7 oncogene, which resulted in the N53S substitution in the immunodominant epitope RAHYNIVTF (aa 49–57). Here, we have shown that this mutation reduced stabilization of H-2D^b molecules on RMA-S cells and eliminated immunogenicity of E7. The resistance of TC-1 clones was E7-specific as immunization against E6 inhibited tumor growth. Transduction of the TC-1/F9 clone carrying the mutated epitope with the wild-type E7 gene restored susceptibility to immunization against E7. Our results suggest that mutagenesis of tumor antigens can lead to the escape of malignant cells and should be considered in the development and evaluation of cancer immunotherapy.     

Functional analysis of a carboxyl-terminal phosphorylation mutant of the bovine papillomavirus E1 protein

The papillomavirus E1 protein is essential for viral DNA replication, and phosphorylation of E1 appears to regulate protein function and DNA replication. Serine 584 of bovine papillomavirus E1 is in a conserved motif resembling a CK2 consensus site, and is phosphorylated by CK2 in vitro. Mutation of serine 584 to alanine eliminates replication of the viral genome in transient replication assays. Wild-type and mutant E1 proteins were expressed from recombinant baculoviruses and used to assess biochemical functions of the amino acid 584 substitution. Helicase enzyme activity, E1 binding to the viral E2 protein and to cellular DNA polymerase alpha-primase were all unaffected in the mutant protein. Binding of E1 to viral replication origin DNA sequences was reduced in the mutant, but not eliminated. The carboxyl-terminal region of the protein appears to play a role in regulating E1 function, and adds to a complex picture emerging for papillomavirus DNA replication control.     

L1CAM regulates DNA damage checkpoint response of glioblastoma stem cells through NBS1

Glioblastomas (GBMs) are highly lethal brain tumours with current therapies limited to palliation due to therapeutic resistance. We previously demonstrated that GBM stem cells (GSCs) display a preferential activation of DNA damage checkpoint and are relatively resistant to radiation. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the preferential checkpoint response in GSCs remain undefined. Here, we show that L1CAM (CD171) regulates DNA damage checkpoint responses and radiosensitivity of GSCs through nuclear translocation of L1CAM intracellular domain (L1-ICD). Targeting L1CAM by RNA interference attenuated DNA damage checkpoint activation and repair, and sensitized GSCs to radiation. L1CAM regulates expression of NBS1, a critical component of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex that activates ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase and early checkpoint response. Ectopic expression of NBS1 in GSCs rescued the decreased checkpoint activation and radioresistance caused by L1CAM knockdown, demonstrating that L1CAM signals through NBS1 to regulate DNA damage checkpoint responses. Mechanistically, nuclear translocation of L1-ICD mediates NBS1 upregulation via c-Myc. These data demonstrate that L1CAM augments DNA damage checkpoint activation and radioresistance of GSCs through L1-ICD-mediated NBS1 upregulation and the enhanced MRN-ATM-Chk2 signalling.