Genistein-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest of human intestinal colon cancer Caco-2 cells is associated with Cyclin B1 and Chk2 down-regulation

Genistein is an isoflavonic phyto-oestrogen contained in soya beans. It is thought to display anti-cancer effects. This study was designed to investigate its effect on human intestinal colon cancer Caco-2 cells. MTT assay, flow cytometric analysis and western blotting were used to investigate the effect of genistein on cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and protein alterations of selected cell cycle-related proteins in Caco-2 cells. Our results showed that genistein and daidzein significantly suppressed cell proliferation. Genistein treatment was demonstrated to modulate cell cycle distribution through accumulation of cells at G2/M phase, with a significant decreasing effect of Cyclin B1 and Serine/threonine-protein kinase 2 (Chk2) proteins expression. However, daidzein did not alter the cell cycle progression in Caco-2 cells. All these observation strongly indicate that genistein has anti-proliferative effect in human intestinal colon cancer Caco-2 cells through the down-regulation of cell cycle check point proteins, Cyclin B1 and Chk2.     

Cyclin A2/cyclin-dependent kinase 1-dependent phosphorylation of Top2a is required for S phase entry during retinal development in zebrafish

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) plays an essential role in cell cycle regulation.However,as mouse Cdk1embryos die early,the role of CDK1 in regulating the cell cycle and embryo development remains unclear.Here,we showed that zebrafish cdk1~(-/-)embryos exhibit severe microphthalmia accompanied by multiple defects in S phase entry,M phase progression,and cell differentiation but not in interkinetic nuclear migration.We identified Top2a as a potential downstream target and cyclin A2 and cyclin B1 as partners of Cdk1 in cell cycle regulation via an in silico analysis.While depletion of either cyclin A2 or Top2a led to the decreased S phase entry in zebrafish retinal cells,the depletion of cyclin B1 led to M phase arrest.Moreover,phosphorylation of Top2a at serine 1213 (S1213) was nearly abolished in both cdk1 and ccna2mutants,but not in ccnb1 mutants.Furthermore,overexpression of TOP2A~(S1213D),the phosphomimetic form of human TOP2A,rescued S phase entry and alleviated the microphthalmia defects in both cdk1~(-/-)and ccna2~(-/-)embryos.Taken together,our data suggest that Cdk1 interacts with cyclin A2 to regulate S phase entry partially through Top2a phosphorylation and interacts with cyclin B1 to regulate M phase progression.     

Acyldepsipeptides inhibit the growth of renal cancer cells through G1 phase cell cycle arrest

Acyldepsipeptides are a group of potent antibiotics discovered in the secondary metabolites of Streptomyces species. However, besides the function of antibiotics, no other activities have been reported about these important compounds so far. In the course of searching the natural products as chemotherapeutic agents for renal cell carcinoma, we found that ADEP1, a major metabolic component of Streptomyces hawaiiensis NRRL 15010, could effectively inhibit the growth of 786-O, 769-P, and ACHN renal carcinoma cells in MTT assay. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that ADEP1 could block the cell cycle arrested at G1 phase. Moreover, it was found that ADEP1 down-regulated the expressions of cyclin D1, CDK4 and PCNA and inhibited activity of MAPK–ERK pathway by detection of decreased expression of phosphorylated ERK1/2 and c-Fos in 786-O and 769-P cells by Western blotting. To our knowledge, this is the first report concerning to the antitumor activities of acyldepsipeptides. Based on these results, ADEP1 may become a promising lead compound to be developed a novel chemotherapeutic agent for treatment of renal carcinoma.     

Viral infections and cell cycle G2／M regulation

Progression of cells from G2 phase of the cell cycle to mitosis is a tightly regulated cellular process that requires activation of the Cdc2 kinase, which determines onset of mitosis in all eukaryotic cells. In both human and fission yeast(Schizosaccharomyces pombe) cells, the activity of Cdc2 is regulated in part by the phosphorylation status of tyrosine 15 (Tyrl5) on Cdc2, which is phosphorylated by Weel kinase during late G2 and is rapidly dephosphorylated by the Cdc25 tyrosine phosphatase to trigger entry into mitosis. These Cdc2 regulators are the downstream targets of two wellcharacterized G2/M checkpoint pathways which prevent cells from entering mitosis when cellular DNA is damaged or when DNA replication is inhibited. Increasing evidence suggests that Cdc2 is also commonly targeted by viral proteins,which modulate host cell cycle machinery to benefit viral survival or replication. In this review, we describe the effect of viral protein R (Vpr) encoded by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-Ⅰ) on cell cycle G2/M regulation. Based on our current knowledge about this viral effect, we hypothesize that Vpr induces cell cycle G2 arrest through a mechanism that is to some extent different from the classic G2/M checkpoints. One the unique features distinguishing Vpr-induced G2 arrest from the classic checkpoints is the role of phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in Vpr-induced G2 arrest.Interestingly, PP2A is targeted by a number of other viral proteins including SV40 small T antigen, polyomavirus T antigen, HTLV Tax and adenovirus E4orf4. Thus an in-depth understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying Vpr-induced G2 arrest will provide additional insights into the basic biology of cell cycle G2/M regulation and into the biological significance of this effect during host-pathogen interactions.     

Leucine zipper and ICAT domain containing (LZIC) protein regulates cell cycle transitions in response to ionizing radiation

Common hallmarks of cancer include the dysregulation of cell cycle progression and the acquisition of genome instability. In tumors, G1 cell cycle checkpoint induction is often lost. This increases the reliance on a functional G2/M checkpoint to prevent progression through mitosis with damaged DNA, avoiding the introduction of potentially aberrant genetic alterations. Treatment of tumors with ionizing radiation (IR) utilizes this dependence on the G2/M checkpoint. Therefore, identification of factors which regulate this process could yield important biomarkers for refining this widely used cancer therapy. Leucine zipper and ICAT domain containing (LZIC) downregulation has been associated with the development of IR-induced tumors. However, despite LZIC being highly conserved, it has no known molecular function. We demonstrate that LZIC knockout (KO) cell lines show a dysregulated G2/M cell cycle checkpoint following IR treatment. In addition, we show that LZIC deficient cells competently activate the G1 and early G2/M checkpoint but fail to maintain the late G2/M checkpoint after IR exposure. Specifically, this defect was found to occur downstream of PIKK signaling. The LZIC KO cells demonstrated severe aneuploidy indicative of genomic instability. In addition, analysis of data from cancer patient databases uncovered a strong correlation between LZIC expression and poor prognosis in several cancers. Our findings suggest that LZIC is functionally involved in cellular response to IR, and its expression level could serve as a biomarker for patient stratification in clinical cancer practice.     

HIV-1 Tat impairs cell cycle control by targeting the Tip60, Plk1 and cyclin B1 ternary complex

HIV-1 Tat triggers intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways in both infected and uninfected cells and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AIDS. Knocking down Tip60, an interactive protein of Tat, leads to the impairment of cell cycle progression, indicating a key role of Tip60 in cell cycle control. We found that Tip60 interacts with Plk1 through its ZnFMYST domain, and that this interaction is enhanced in the G₂/M phase. In addition, cyclin B1 was confirmed to interact with the ZnF domain of Tip60. Immunofluorescence imaging showed that Tip60 co-localizes with both Plk1 and cyclin B1 at the centrosome during the mitotic phase and to the mid-body during cytokinesis. Further experiments revealed that Tip60 forms a ternary complex with Plk1 and cyclin B1 and acetylates Plk1 but not cyclin B1. HIV-1 Tat likely forms a quaternary complex with Tip60, cyclin B1 and Plk1. Fluorescent microscopy showed that Tat causes an unscheduled nuclear translocation of both cyclin B1 and Plk1, causing their co-localization with Tip60 in the nucleus. Tat, Tip60, cyclin B1 and Plk1 interactions provide new a mechanistic explanation for Tat-mediated cell cycle dysregulation and apoptosis.     

The role of NBS1 in DNA double strand break repair, telomere stability, and cell cycle checkpoint control

The genomes of eukaryotic cells are under continuous assault by environmental agents and endogenous metabolic byproducts. Damage induced in DNA usually leads to a cascade of cellular events, the DNA damage response. Failure of the DNA damage response can lead to development of malignancy by reducing the efficiency and fidelity of DNA repair. The NBS1 protein is a component of the MRE11/RAD50/NBS 1 complex （MRN） that plays a critical role in the cellular response to DNA damage and the maintenance of chromosomal integrity. Mutations in the NBS1 gene are responsible for Nijmegen breakage syndrome （NBS）, a hereditary disorder that imparts an increased predisposition to development of malignancy. The phenotypic characteristics of cells isolated from NBS patients point to a deficiency in the repair of DNA double strand breaks. Here, we review the current knowledge of the role of NBS1 in the DNA damage response. Emphasis is placed on the role of NBS1 in the DNA double strand repair, modulation of the DNA damage sensing and signaling, cell cycle checkpoint control and maintenance oftelomere stability.     

The protein phosphatase 1 regulator PNUTS is a new component of the DNA damage response

The function of protein phosphatase 1 nuclear-targeting subunit (PNUTS)--one of the most abundant nuclear-targeting subunits of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1c)--remains largely uncharacterized. We show that PNUTS depletion by small interfering RNA activates a G2 checkpoint in unperturbed cells and prolongs G2 checkpoint and Chk1 activation after ionizing-radiation-induced DNA damage. Overexpression of PNUTS-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)--which is rapidly and transiently recruited at DNA damage sites--inhibits G2 arrest. Finally, γH2AX, p53-binding protein 1, replication protein A and Rad51 foci are present for a prolonged period and clonogenic survival is decreased in PNUTS-depleted cells after ionizing radiation treatment. We identify the PP1c regulatory subunit PNUTS as a new and integral component of the DNA damage response involved in DNA repair.     

Inherited DNA lesions determine G1 duration in the next cell cycle

Replication stress is a major source of DNA damage and an important driver of cancer development. Replication intermediates that occur upon mild forms of replication stress frequently escape cell cycle checkpoints and can be transmitted through mitosis into the next cell cycle. The consequences of such inherited DNA lesions for cell fate and survival are poorly understood. By using time-lapse microscopy and quantitative image-based cytometry to simultaneously monitor inherited DNA lesions marked by the genome caretaker protein 53BP1 and cell cycle progression, we show that inheritance of 53BP1-marked lesions from the previous S-phase is associated with a prolonged G1 duration in the next cell cycle. These results suggest that cell-to-cell variation in S-phase commitment is determined, at least partially, by the amount of replication-born inherited DNA damage in individual cells. We further show that loss of the tumor suppressor protein p53 overrides replication stress-induced G1 prolongation and allows S-phase entry with excessive amounts of inherited DNA lesions. Thus, replication stress and p53 loss may synergize during cancer development by promoting cell cycle re-entry with unrepaired mutagenic DNA lesions originating from the previous cell cycle.     

WWOX suppresses prostate cancer cell progression through cyclin D1-mediated cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase

WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) has been reported to be a tumor suppressor in multiple cancers, including prostate cancer. WWOX can induce apoptotic responses to inhibit tumor progression, and the other mechanisms of WWOX in tumor suppression have also been reported recently. In this study, we found significant down-regulation of WWOX in prostate cancer specimens and prostate cancer cell lines compared with the normal controls. In addition, an ectopically increased WWOX expression repressed tumor progression both in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, overexpression of WWOX in 22Rv1 cells led to cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase but did not affect sub-G1 in flow cytometry. GFP-WWOX overexpressed 22Rv1 cells were shown to inhibit cell cycle progression into mitosis under nocodazole treatment in flow cytometry, immunoblotting and GFP fluorescence. Further, cyclin D1 but not apoptosis correlated genes were down-regulated by WWOX both in vitro and in vivo. Restoration of cyclin D1 in the WWOX-overexpressed 22Rv1 cells could abolish the WWOX-mediated tumor repression. In addition, WWOX impair c-Jun-mediated cyclin D1 promoter activity. These results suggest that WWOX inhibits prostate cancer progression through negatively regulating cyclin D1 in cell cycle lead to G1 arrest. In summary, our data reveal a novel mechanism of WWOX in tumor suppression.     

WWOX suppresses prostate cancer cell progression through cyclin D1-mediated cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase

WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) has been reported to be a tumor suppressor in multiple cancers, including prostate cancer. WWOX can induce apoptotic responses to inhibit tumor progression, and the other mechanisms of WWOX in tumor suppression have also been reported recently. In this study, we found significant down-regulation of WWOX in prostate cancer specimens and prostate cancer cell lines compared with the normal controls. In addition, an ectopically increased WWOX expression repressed tumor progression both in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, overexpression of WWOX in 22Rv1 cells led to cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase but did not affect sub-G1 in flow cytometry. GFP-WWOX overexpressed 22Rv1 cells were shown to inhibit cell cycle progression into mitosis under nocodazole treatment in flow cytometry, immunoblotting and GFP fluorescence. Further, cyclin D1 but not apoptosis correlated genes were down-regulated by WWOX both in vitro and in vivo. Restoration of cyclin D1 in the WWOX-overexpressed 22Rv1 cells could abolish the WWOX-mediated tumor repression. In addition, WWOX impair c-Jun-mediated cyclin D1 promoter activity. These results suggest that WWOX inhibits prostate cancer progression through negatively regulating cyclin D1 in cell cycle lead to G1 arrest. In summary, our data reveal a novel mechanism of WWOX in tumor suppression.     

Ecdysone-induced accumulation of mosquito cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle

We have established baseline conditions for investigating the interaction of the insect steroid hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) with the cell cycle in the C7-10 cell line from the mosquito, Aedes albopictus. As is the case with Drosophila melanogaster cells, treatment of C7-10 cells with 20E inhibits proliferation. In the presence of 10⁻⁶ M 20E, a gradual decline in cell number is typically apparent at 24 h. Media components such as phenol red and the potential presence of endogenous steroids in serum have no effect on the response to 20E. Pre-treating the cells with 10⁻⁸ M 20E, with or without an intervening hormone-free period, did not alter the response to 10⁻⁶ M 20E. However, replenishment of the medium appeared to synchronize the response to 10⁻⁶ M 20E, causing an abrupt and complete cessation of cell division by 48 h. Flow cytometry over a 20 h period showed a decrease in the proportion of cells in S within 4-6 h after exposure to 20E. By 6-10 h, a transient increase in G2 was followed by the accumulation of more than 70% of the cells in G1. These data suggest that after treatment with 20E, cells complete the ongoing cycle before arresting in G1. Consistent with the decrease in the proportion of cells in S and G2, western blots show that levels of cyclin A, which is required during the S phase of the cycle, decreased in 20E-treated cells.     

Role of G1 phase in the UV-induced apoptosis of EL-4 mouse lymphoma cells

Although UV is known to induce apoptotic cell death to various animal cells, relationship between cell cycle and UV-induced apoptosis is still unclear. In this study, we investigated the role of G1 phase in UV-induced apoptosis by using EL-4 mouse lymphoma cells which have wild type p53. After 500 J/m UV irradiation, an increase of apoptotic fraction was accompanied by cell cycle accumulation in the G1 phase. Apoptotic fraction after UV-exposure was remarkably augmented by treatment with 2-AP, a G1 checkpoint inhibitor. In contrast, aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA polymerase , suppressed the rate of apoptotic fraction.These results suggest that mandatory cell cycle progression from G1 to S leaves the damaged DNA unrepaired and may increase the apoptotic fraction. To investigate the precise mechanism in the G1 phase, UV was exposed to the G1-synchronized cells and apoptotic fraction was serially observed. Synchronized EL-4 cells passed through the G1 phase in 8 h. Within the G1 phase, late-G1 cells (6 h after M) were more sensitive to UV-induced apoptosis than early-G1 cells (2 h after M) (49.7 ± 9.0% vs. 41.5 ± 8.5%, p < 0.05). In HL-60 cells, lacking in p53 expression, such a difference was not observed. Western blot analysis revealed that expression of p53 in synchronized EL-4 cells was increasingly enhanced during G1 phase. After UV-exposure, p53 expression gradually decreased in early-G1 cells, but it was kept at almost the same level in late-G1 cells. In addition, bcl-2 expression in early-G1 cells showed a more rapid and larger increase than that in late-G1 cells. These results suggest that susceptibility of the G1 cells to UV-induced apoptosis depends on their position within the G1 phase, and late-G1 is more sensitive than early-G1. Sensitivity to UV-induced apoptosis is closely related to the expression level of p53 and bcl-2 proteins. Early-G1 cells may be able to take enough time to repair damaged DNA until they reach the G1 checkpoint compared to the late-G1 cells.