Upregulation of survivin by HIV-1 Vpr

The human survivin gene belongs to the family of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP) and is involved in apoptosis inhibition and regulation of cell division. The survivin gene is the only member of the IAP family whose expression is known to be regulated through the cell cycle. Survivin expression reaches the highest levels during the G₂/M transition and then is rapidly degraded during the G₁ phase. Here we report that the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) upregulates Survivin expression via survivin promoter transactivation. Vpr, an HIV-1 accessory protein that induces cell cycle arrest in G₂/M, is necessary and sufficient for this effect. Blocking Vpr-induced G₂/M arrest leads to elimination of the survivin promoter transactivation by Vpr. Our results suggest that Survivin may be actively involved in regulating cell viability during HIV-1 infection.     

Divide and differentiate

The elegant choreography of metazoan development demands exquisite regulation of cell-division timing, orientation, and asymmetry. In this review, we discuss studies in Drosophila and C. elegans that reveal how the cell cycle machinery, comprised of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and cyclins functions as a master regulator of development. We provide examples of how CDK/cyclins: (1) regulate the asymmetric localization and timely destruction of cell fate determinants; (2) couple signaling to the control of cell division orientation; and (3) maintain mitotic zones for stem cell proliferation. These studies illustrate how the core cell cycle machinery should be viewed not merely as an engine that drives the cell cycle forward, but rather as a dynamic regulator that integrates the cell-division cycle with cellular differentiation, ensuring the coherent and faithful execution of developmental programs.     

Antitumor effects of a novel benzonaphthofurandione derivative (8e) on the human colon cancer cells in vitro and in vivo through cell cycle arrest accompanied with the modulation of EGFR and mTOR signaling

Benzonaphthofurandione has been considered as an important class of naturally occurring and synthetic compounds having a variety of biological functions. In this study, we evaluated the antitumor effects of 3-[2-(dimethylamino)isopropoxy]-1-hydroxybenzo[b]naphtho[2,3-d]furan-6,11-dione (8e), a novel benzonaphthofurandione derivative, on the growth of colorectal cancer HCT 116 cells both in vitro culture and an in vivo animal model.Compound 8e exhibited the potential growth inhibition of the colon cancer cells in a concentration-dependent manner. The anti-proliferative activity of 8e was also associated with the induction of cell cycle arrest in the G₀/G₁ phase. The 8e-induced cell cycle arrest was well correlated with the suppression of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), CDK4, cyclin D1, cyclin E, c-Myc, and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (pRb). The tumor growth in xenograft nude mice bearing HCT 116 cells by compound 8e (10 mg/kg) also significantly inhibited without any overt toxicity. In addition, the down-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Akt, and mTOR signalings were associated with the anti-proliferative activity of compound 8e in colon cancer cells. Taken together, these findings suggested that cell cycle arrest and modulation of cell signal transduction pathways might be the plausible mechanisms of actions for the anti-proliferative activity of 8e, and thus 8e might be used as an effective chemotherapeutic agent in human colon cancer.     

A dinoflagellate CDK5-like cyclin-dependent kinase

Background information. Mitosis during the dinoflagellate cell cycle is unusual in that the nuclear envelope remains intact and segregation of the permanently condensed chromosomes uses a cytoplasmic mitotic spindle. To examine regulation of the dinoflagellate cell cycle in the context of these unusual nuclear features, it is necessary to isolate and characterize cell cycle regulators such as CDK (cyclin‐dependent kinase). Results. We report the characterization of a CDK from the dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum. This CDK reacts with an anti‐PSTAIRE antibody and was identified by protein microsequencing after partial purification. The protein microsequence shows homology toward the Pho85/CDK5 clade of CDKs. Neither the amount nor the phosphorylation state changed over the course of the cell cycle, in agreement with results reported for CDK5 family members in other systems. Conclusions. We conclude we have probably isolated a dinoflagellate CDK5‐like protein. The data reported here support the identification of this protein as a CDK5 homologue, and suggest that dinoflagellates may contain several CDK families.     

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 may be expressed as multiple proteins and have functions that are independent of binding to CCND and RB and occur at the S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) is known to be a 33 kD protein that drives G₁ phase progression of the cell cycle by binding to a CCND protein to phosphorylate RB proteins. Using different CDK4 antibodies in western blot, we detected 2 groups of proteins around 40 and 33 kD, respectively, in human and mouse cells; each group often appeared as a duplet or triplet of bands. Some CDK4 shRNAs could decrease the 33 kD wild-type (wt) CDK4 but increase some 40 kD proteins, whereas some other shRNAs had the opposite effects. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry analysis confirmed the existence of CDK4 isoforms smaller than 33 kD but failed to identify CDK4 at 40 kD. We cloned one CDK4 mRNA variant that lacks exon 2 and encodes a 26 kD protein without the first 74 amino acids of the wt CDK4, thus lacking the ATP binding sequence and the PISTVRE domain required for binding to CCND. Co-IP assay confirmed that this ΔE2 protein lost CCND1- and RB1-binding ability. Moreover, we found, surprisingly, that the wt CDK4 and the ΔE2 could inhibit G₁–S progression, accelerate S–G₂/M progression, and enhance or delay apoptosis in a cell line-specific manner in a situation where the cells were treated with a CDK4 inhibitor or the cells were serum-starved and then replenished. Hence, CDK4 seems to be expressed as multiple proteins that react differently to different CDK4 antibodies, respond differently to different shRNAs, and, in some situations, have previously unrecognized functions at the S–G₂/M phases of the cell cycle via mechanisms independent of binding to CCND and RB.     

Roscovitine, a novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, characterizes restriction point and G2/M transition in tobacco BY-2 cell suspension

Although the developmental programs of plants and animals differ, key regulatory components of their cell cycle have been conserved. Particular attention has been paid to the role of the complexes between highly conserved cyclin and cyclin-dependent kinases in regulating progression through the cell cycle. The recent demonstration that roscovitine is a potent and selective inhibitor of the animal cyclin-dependent kinases cdc2 (CDK1), CDK2 and CDK5 prompted an investigation into its effects on progression through the plant cell cycle. Roscovitine induced arrests both in late G1 and late G2 phase in BY-2 tobacco cell suspensions. Both blocks were fully reversible when roscovitine was used at concentrations similar to those used in the animal system. Stationary-phase cells subcultured in the presence of roscovitine were arrested at a 2C DNA content. This arrest was more efficient without exogenous addition of plant growth regulator. Roscovitine induced a block in G1 earlier than that induced by aphidicolin. S-phase synchronized cells treated with roscovitine were arrested at a 4C DNA content at the G2/ M transition. The expression analysis of a mitotic cyclin (NTCYC1) indicated that the roscovitine-induced G2 block probably occurs in late G2. Finally, cells in metaphase were insensitive to roscovitine. The purified CDK/cyclin kinase activities of late G1 and early M arrested cells were inhibited in vitro by roscovitine. The implications of these experimental observations for the requirement for CDK activity during progression through the plant cell cycle are discussed.     

Inhibition of autophagy by 3-MA potentiates purvalanol-induced apoptosis in Bax deficient HCT 116 colon cancer cells

The purine-derived analogs, roscovitine and purvalanol are selective synthetic inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) induced cell cycle arrest and lead to apoptotic cell death in various cancer cells. Although a number of studies investigated the molecular mechanism of each CDK inhibitor on apoptotic cell death mechanism with their therapeutic potential, their regulatory role on autophagy is not clarified yet. In this paper, our aim was to investigate molecular mechanism of CDK inhibitors on autophagy and apoptosis in wild type (wt) and Bax deficient HCT 116 cells. Exposure of HCT 116 wt and Bax^−/− cells to roscovitine or purvalanol for 24 h decreased cell viability in dose-dependent manner. However, Bax deficient HCT 116 cells were found more resistant against purvalanol treatment compared to wt cells. We also established that both CDK inhibitors induced apoptosis through activating mitochondria-mediated pathway in caspase-dependent manner regardless of Bax expression in HCT 116 colon cancer cells. Concomitantly, we determined that purvalanol was also effective on autophagy in HCT 116 colon cancer cells. Inhibition of autophagy by 3-MA treatment enhanced the purvalanol induced apoptotic cell death in HCT 116 Bax^−/− cells. Our results revealed that mechanistic action of each CDK inhibitor on cell death mechanism differs. While purvalanol treatment activated apoptosis and autophagy in HCT 116 cells, roscovitine was only effective on caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway. Another important difference between two CDK inhibitors, although roscovitine treatment overcame Bax-mediated drug resistance in HCT 116 cells, purvalanol did not exert same effect.     

Expression analysis and molecular targeting of cyclin-dependent kinases in advanced melanoma: Functional analysis and molecular targeting of cyclin-dependent kinase family members in advanced melanoma

A major focus of melanoma research continues to be the search for genes/proteins that may be suitable targets for molecular therapy of primary and metastatic melanoma. In line with this effort, the objective of the study presented herein was to determine whether interfering with cell cycle progression and in particular, the expression and function of select cyclin-dependent kinases, would impair the biological features of advanced melanoma. We provide data, which document that unlike nevi and melanoma in situ, primary and metastatic melanomas express high levels of CDK2, CDK1, and CDK5. Furthermore, we present the results of in vitro and preclinical in vivo studies, which demonstrate that treatment with a small-molecule cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that selectively blocks the function of CDK2, CDK5, CDK1 and CDK9, leads not only to inhibition of melanoma cell proliferation and apoptosis of melanoma cells, but also impairs the growth of human melanoma xenografts.Key words: melanoma, cyclin-dependent kinase expression, small-molecule inhibitor treatment, proliferation, cell cycle progression, apoptosis, tumor xenograft studies     

Cell kinetic studies in the murine ventral tongue epithelium: thymidine metabolism studies and circadian rhythm determination

Abstract.  The oral mucosa is a rapidly replacing body tissue that has received relatively little attention in terms of defining its cell kinetics and cellular organization. The tissue is sensitive to the effects of cytotoxic agents, the consequence of which can be stem cell death with the subsequent development of ulcers and the symptoms of oral mucositis. There is considerable interest in designing strategies to protect oral stem cells and, hence, reduce the mucositis side-effects in cancer therapy patients. Here we present details of a new histometric approach designed to investigate the changing patterns in cellularity in the ventral tongue mucosa. This initial paper in a series of four papers presents observations on the changing patterns in the labelling index following tritiated thymidine administration, which suggest a delayed uptake of tritiated thymidine from a long-term intracellular thymidine pool, a phenomenon that will complicate cell kinetic interpretations in a variety of experimental situations. We also provide data on the changing pattern of mitotic activity through a 24-h period (circadian rhythms). Using vincristine-induced stathmokinesis, the data indicate that 54% of the basal cells divide each day and that there is a high degree of synchrony in mitotic activity with a mitotic peak occurring around 13.00 h. The mitotic circadian peak occurs 9-12 h after the circadian peak in DNA synthesis. The data presented here and in the subsequent papers could be interpreted to indicate that basal cells of BDF1 mice have an average turnover time of about 26-44 h with some cells cycling once a day and others with a 2- or 3-day cell cycle time.     

The positive circadian regulators CLOCK and BMAL1 control G2/M cell cycle transition through Cyclin B1

We previously identified a tight bidirectional phase coupling between the circadian clock and the cell cycle. To understand the role of the CLOCK/BMAL1 complex, representing the main positive regulator of the circadian oscillator, we knocked down Bmal1 or Clock in NIH3T3^3C mouse fibroblasts (carrying fluorescent reporters for clock and cell cycle phase) and analyzed timing of cell division in individual cells and cell populations. Inactivation of Bmal1 resulted in a loss of circadian rhythmicity and a lengthening of the cell cycle, originating from delayed G2/M transition. Subsequent molecular analysis revealed reduced levels of Cyclin B1, an important G2/M regulator, upon suppression of Bmal1 gene expression. In complete agreement with these experimental observations, simulation of Bmal1 knockdown in a computational model for coupled mammalian circadian clock and cell cycle oscillators (now incorporating Cyclin B1 induction by BMAL1) revealed a lengthening of the cell cycle. Similar data were obtained upon knockdown of Clock gene expression. In conclusion, the CLOCK/BMAL1 complex controls cell cycle progression at the level of G2/M transition through regulation of Cyclin B1 expression.     

Asynchronous nuclear division cycles in multinucleated cells

Synchronous mitosis is common in multinucleated cells. We analyzed a unique asynchronous nuclear division cycle in a multinucleated filamentous fungus, Ashbya gossypii. Nuclear pedigree analysis and observation of GFP-labeled spindle pole bodies demonstrated that neighboring nuclei in A. gossypii cells are in different cell cycle stages despite close physical proximity. Neighboring nuclei did not differ significantly in their patterns of cyclin protein localization such that both G1 and mitotic cyclins were present regardless of cell cycle stage, suggesting that the complete destruction of cyclins is not occurring in this system. Indeed, the expression of mitotic cyclin lacking NH(2)-terminal destruction box sequences did not block cell cycle progression. Cells lacking AgSic1p, a predicted cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, however, showed aberrant multipolar spindles and fragmented nuclei that are indicative of flawed mitoses. We hypothesize that the continuous cytoplasm in these cells promoted the evolution of a nuclear division cycle in which CDK inhibitors primarily control CDK activity rather than oscillating mitotic cyclin proteins.     

Restraining CDK1–cyclin B activation: PP2A on the cUSP(7)

USP7 inhibitors are gaining momentum as a therapeutic strategy to stabilize p53 through their ability to induce MDM2 degradation. However, these inhibitors come with an unexpected p53‐independent toxicity, via an unknown mechanism. In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Galarreta et al report how inhibition of USP7 leads to re‐distribution of PP2A from cytoplasm to nucleus and an increase of deleterious CDK1‐dependent phosphorylation throughout the cell cycle, revealing a new regulatory mechanism for the progression of S‐phase cells toward mitosis to maintain genomic integrity.Subject Categories: Cell Cycle, Post-translational Modifications, Proteolysis & Proteomics

Recent work reveals untimely activation of mitotic cyclin‐dependent kinase as a molecular basis for p53‐independent cell toxicity of USP7 deubiquitinase inhibitors.

The G2‐M transition in the eukaryotic cell cycle is a critical point to ensure that cells with damaged DNA are unable to enter the mitotic phase. This checkpoint is highly regulated by a number of kinases, including ATR, ATM and WEE1, and ends upon activation of the CDK1–cyclin B1 kinase complex (Visconti et al, 2016). Since premature activation of CDK1–cyclin B1 causes replication fork collapse, DNA damage, apoptosis, and mitotic catastrophe (Szmyd et al, 2019 and references therein), restricting CDK1–cyclin B1 activity prior to mitosis is key to maintaining genomic integrity.A body of recent work has suggested that the deubiquitinase USP7 is a master regulator of genomic integrity; it is required for DNA replication in numerous ways, including indirect regulation of cyclin A2 during the S‐phase, origin firing, and replication fork progression. USP7 also regulates mitotic entry by stabilizing PLK1, another kinase which is highly active in the M phase and ensures proper alignment of chromatids prior to segregation. Notably, USP7 inhibitors have become an attractive cancer therapeutic strategy based on their ability to trigger degradation of MDM2, and thereby stabilize p53 (Valles et al, 2020). However, there is growing evidence of USP7 inhibitor‐related toxicity that is not mediated through p53 (Lecona et al, 2016; Agathanggelou et al, 2017), indicating that USP7 inhibitors impact other cellular processes. Therefore, Galarreta et al (2021) investigated the potential functional relationship between USP7 and CDK1, given the role of both factors in regulating the cell cycle.Through a series of in vitro experiments, the authors confirmed that five USP7 inhibitors induce premature mitotic kinase activity, including increased MPM2 signal (indicative of mitosis‐specific phosphorylation events) and phosphorylation of histone H3 Ser10 (H3S10P) in all cells, regardless of where they are in the cell cycle. To determine whether USP7 affects CDK1 during the cell cycle, Galarreta et al (2021) demonstrate that cell lines treated with USP7 inhibitors exhibit reduced levels of inhibitory Tyr‐15 phosphorylation on CDK1 and increased cyclin B1 presence in the nucleus, suggesting activation of the CDK1–cyclin B1 complex. Furthermore, treatment with the CDK1 inhibitor RO3306 rescues the USP7 inhibitor‐dependent increase of mitotic activity.These observations suggest that CDK1 has the potential to catalyze mitosis‐specific phosphorylation irrespective of cell cycle phase and that cells rely on USP7‐specific deubiquitination to suppress or reverse premature CDK1 activity. Surprisingly, despite the nuclear localization of cyclin B and decrease in inhibitory CDK1 Tyr‐15 phosphorylation, USP7 inhibitors failed to drive cells into mitosis. How might this be? Nuclear localization of cyclin B normally occurs just minutes before the onset of mitosis and nuclear envelope breakdown (Santos et al, 2012), yet the nucleus remains intact following USP7 inhibition. Moreover, the decrease in Tyr‐15 phosphorylation suggests the ATR‐ and WEE1‐dependent G2/M checkpoint is inactivated by USP7 inhibition. Do these data hint at the presence of an additional, unknown regulatory mechanism controlling mitotic entry independent of the G2/M checkpoint and nuclear localization of the CDK1–cyclin B complex?To determine whether CDK1 is the driver of USP7 inhibitor toxicity, Galarreta et al exposed cells to CDK1 inhibitors and observed a reduction in apoptosis. Furthermore, CDK1 inhibitors promote cell survival in cells treated with three structurally unrelated USP7 inhibitors. Finally, CDC25A‐deficient mouse embryonic stem cells, which constitutively express low levels of CDK1, resist USP7 inhibition. Together, these data suggest that the USP7 inhibitor‐dependent toxicity is the result of CDK1‐mediated cell death. The authors note that the phosphatase PP2A is an antagonist for CDK1 in addition to being a candidate USP7 substrate (Lecona et al, 2016; Wlodarchak & Xing, 2016), and thus, they turned their attention to elucidating the connection between USP7 and PP2A. Combining biochemical and immunofluorescence studies, Galarreta et al (2021) demonstrate that USP7 interacts with two subunits of PP2A, and this interaction increases in response to USP7 inhibition. Inhibiting USP7 furthermore triggers PP2A re‐localization from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and increases the phosphorylation levels of PP2A substrates, such as AKT and PRC1. DT‐061, a chemical activator of PP2A, reduces CDK1 phosphorylation events, suggesting that PP2A deregulation is a key mediator of USP7 inhibitor‐related toxicity. Using phosphoproteomics to analyze cells treated with a USP7 inhibitor or PP2A‐inhibiting okadaic acid, the authors reveal that both treatments share a significant number of altered phosphorylated targets—especially those related to mitosis, the cell cycle, and epitopes with a CDK‐dependent motif. Thus, the effects of USP7 inhibitors on CDK1 appear to be mediated through PP2A localization to the nucleus.These unexpected findings raise several questions that potentially impact the current view of cell cycle regulation. For example, how does USP7 regulate PP2A localization and is this important for reversing CDK1‐dependent phosphorylation of mitotic substrates prior to mitosis? Does PP2A accumulation in the nucleus explain the failure of USP7‐inhibited cells to enter mitosis despite cyclin B1 nuclear localization? A role for ubiquitin signaling as a regulator of CDK1 in interphase cells has not been reported, and accordingly, new investigations will be needed to unravel the mechanisms by which USP7 controls PP2A localization.Another important question that arises is whether or not CDK1 has sufficient basal activity to phosphorylate numerous mitotic proteins independent of cell cycle phase. The observation that USP7 and PP2A act to prevent the improper accumulation of CDK1‐dependent phosphorylation even in G1 phase cells suggests this to be the case. Alternatively, USP7 activity may be required to prevent abnormal pairing of CDK1 with a cyclin that is ubiquitously expressed across the cell cycle. If so, more research will be needed to uncover how ubiquitin signaling ensures CDK1 only pairs with cyclin A and cyclin B once they accumulate later in the cell cycle.Interestingly, USP7 inhibition also causes a rapid loss in DNA synthesis of S‐phase cells, prompting the authors to perform a time course experiment to decipher the order of events following treatment (i.e., does CDK1 activation precede or follow termination of DNA replication?). High‐throughput microscopy and flow cytometry analysis reveal an immediate reduction of DNA replication, an increase of CDK1 activity, and elevated DNA damage before a detectable increase in H3S10P. Long‐term exposure of USP7 inhibitors leads to DNA damage restricted only to cells with corresponding high levels of H3S10P and MPM2. Overall, these results illustrate how inhibition of USP7 activates CDK1, disrupting DNA replication and inducing DNA damage (Fig 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1USP7 regulates CDK1In untreated cells, CDK1 is suppressed by USP7 and PP2A, and CDK1‐cyclin B is only active during the G2/M transition. In response to treatment, USP7 facilitates PP2A localization to the nucleus. This allows CDK1 to initiate premature mitotic activity throughout the cell cycle, resulting in increased DNA damage and cellular toxicity.The finding that USP7 inhibitors caused a rapid shutdown of DNA replication brings to mind the recent findings by several groups, that CDK1 activation occurs concomitantly with the S/G2 transition and that premature CDK1 activation in S‐phase terminates replication (Akopyan et al, 2014; Lemmens et al, 2018; Saldivar et al, 2018; Deng et al, 2019; Branigan et al, 2021). According to these studies, coupling of CDK1 activation to the S/G2 transition is regulated by ATR‐CHK1 signaling, a pathway activated by DNA replication to restrain CDK1 through Tyr‐15 phosphorylation. Galarreta et al''s observation that USP7 inhibition overrides ATR‐CHK1 (i.e., Tyr‐15 phosphorylation) highlights the fundamental importance of ubiquitin signaling, and potentially PP2A localization, for ensuring proper S‐to‐M progression and genome maintenance. Ultimately, the mechanistic details of Galarreta et al''s observations remain to be elucidated, and undoubtedly, their findings will inspire future investigations. Moreover, their discovery may lead to a new strategy targeting CDK1 to mitigate unwanted toxicities in the clinic.     

周期蛋白和周期蛋白依赖性激酶及相关激酶抑制剂在细胞周期进程中的调控机制研究进展

在细胞发育过程中,细胞周期起着至关重要的作用。细胞周期进程主要受细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(cyclin dependent kinase, CDK)、周期蛋白和内源性CDK抑制剂(cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors,CKI)调控。其中,CDK是主要的细胞周期调节因子,可与周期蛋白结合形成周期蛋白-CDK复合物,从而使数百种底物磷酸化,调控分裂间期和有丝分裂进程。各类细胞周期蛋白的活性异常,可引起不受控制的癌细胞增殖,导致癌症的发生与发展。因此,了解CDK的活性变化情况、周期蛋白-CDK的组装以及CKI的作用,将有助于了解细胞周期进程中潜在的调控过程,为癌症与疾病的治疗和CKI治疗药物的研发提供基础。本文关注了CDK激活和灭活的关键事件,并总结了周期蛋白-CDK在特定时期及位置的调控过程,以及相关CKI治疗药物在癌症及疾病中的研究进展,最后简单阐述了细胞周期进程研究面临的问题和存在的挑战,以期为后续细胞周期进程的深入研究提供参考和思路。     

CDK inhibitors suppress apoptosis induced by chemicals and by excessive expression of a cell death gene, reaper, in Drosophila cells

The present study was aimed to investigate whether or not cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) participate in different cascades leading to apoptosis. We examined the effects of two CDK inhibitors, olomoucine (OLM) and buty-rolactone-I (BL-I), on apoptosis induced in two kinds of Drosophila cell lines. Increases of caspase activity induced by actinomycin D, cycloheximide, H-7 or A23187 in a Drosophila neuronal cell line, ML-DmBG2-c2, and induced by excessive expression of a Drosophila cell death gene, reaper, in Drosophila S2 cells were suppressed by 24-h pretreatment of each CDK inhibitor. Concomitant with the suppression of the caspase activity, fragmentations of cells and DNA, representatives of apoptosis, were also inhibited. These results suggest that CDK(s) participates in progression of apoptosis. However, these effects of the CDK inhibitors were also observed even at lower doses which did not affect cell proliferation. Therefore, it was shown that apoptosis is not always related to cell cycle in Drosophila cells. It was also suggested that the target(s) of the CDK inhibitors locates upstream of caspase in the cascade(s) of apoptosis.     

Expression of survivin mRNA and protein in gastric cancer cell line (MKN-45) during cisplatin treatment

Survivin is a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family. Survivin has been reported to be expressed in many cancers, but not in differentiated normal tissue. Recent studies revealed that survivin correlated with the chemo-resitance of cancer cells. In the present study, the changes in expression levels of survivin messenger RNA (mRNA) and survivin protein in a gastric cancer cell line (MKN-45) during cisplatin (CDDP) treatment were analyzed and compared with the occurrence of apoptotic cell death. Cell growth was inhibited even with a low dose CDDP (0.1 or 1 g/ml) 1 hr treatment. However, the percentage of apoptotic cells did not change after 48 hr incubation with low dose CDDP. Only with high dose CDDP (10 g/ml), did the percentage of apoptotic cells explosively increase between 12 and 24 hr treatment. Relative expression levels of survivin mRNA and survivin protein increased after CDDP treatment. The cell expression rates of survivin mRNA after 48 hr treatment with 0.1 and 1 g/ml of CDDP were 2 to 6 fold higher than that of the survivin mRNA of untreated cells. Also, the relative cell expression level of survivin protein after 24 hr treatment with 0.1 or 1 g/ml of CDDP was 3 to 6.5 fold higher than that of the survivin protein of untreated cells. These results indicate that survivin expression may correlate with the chemo-resistance of malignant cells.     

The Akt Inhibitor ISC-4 Synergizes with Cetuximab in 5-FU-Resistant Colon Cancer

Phenylbutyl isoselenocyanate (ISC-4) is an Akt inhibitor with demonstrated preclinical efficacy against melanoma and colon cancer. In this study, we sought to improve the clinical utility of ISC-4 by identifying a synergistic combination with FDA-approved anti-cancer therapies, a relevant and appropriate disease setting for testing, and biomarkers of response. We tested the activity of ISC-4 and 19 FDA-approved anticancer agents, alone or in combination, against the SW480 and RKO human colon cancer cell lines. A synergistic interaction with cetuximab was identified and validated in a panel of additional colon cancer cell lines, as well as the kinetics of synergy. ISC-4 in combination with cetuximab synergistically reduced the viability of human colon cancer cells with wild-type but not mutant KRAS genes. Further analysis revealed that the combination therapy cooperatively decreased cell cycle progression, increased caspase-dependent apoptosis, and decreased phospho-Akt in responsive tumor cells. The synergism between ISC-4 and cetuximab was retained independently of acquired resistance to 5-FU in human colon cancer cells. The combination demonstrated synergistic anti-tumor effects in vivo without toxicity and in the face of resistance to 5-FU. These results suggest that combining ISC-4 and cetuximab should be explored in patients with 5-FU-resistant colon cancer harboring wild-type KRAS.     

ICK1, a cyclin-dependent protein kinase inhibitor from Arabidopsis thaliana interacts with both Cdc2a and CycD3, and its expression is induced by abscisic acid

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor genes encode low molecular weight proteins which have important functions in cell cycle regulation, development and perhaps also in tumorigenesis. The first plant CDK inhibitor gene ICK1 was recently identified from Arabidopsis thaliana . Although the C-terminal domain of ICK1 contained an important consensus sequence with the mammalian CDK inhibitor p27^Kip1, the remainder of the deduced ICK1 sequence showed little similarity to any known CDK inhibitors. In vitro assays showed that recombinant ICK1 exhibited unique kinase inhibitory properties. In the present study we characterized ICK1 in terms of its gene structure, its interaction with both A. thaliana Cdc2a and CycD3, and its induction by the plant growth regulator, abscisic acid (ABA). ICK1 was expressed at a relatively low level in the tissues surveyed. However, ICK1 was induced by ABA, and along with ICK1 induction there was a decrease in Cdc2-like histone H1 kinase activity. These results suggest a molecular mechanism by which plant cell division might be inhibited by ABA. ICK1 clones were also identified from independent yeast two-hybrid screens using the CycD3 construct. The implication that ICK1 protein could interact with both Cdc2a and CycD3 was confirmed by in vitro binding assays. Furthermore, deletion analysis indicated that different regions of ICK1 are required for the interactions with Cdc2a and CycD3. These results provide a mechanistic basis for understanding the role of CDK inhibitors in cell cycle regulation in plant cells.     

A Cell Cycle Timer for Asymmetric Spindle Positioning

The displacement of the mitotic spindle to one side of a cell is important for many cells to divide unequally. While recent progress has begun to unveil some of the molecular mechanisms of mitotic spindle displacement, far less is known about how spindle displacement is precisely timed. A conserved mitotic progression mechanism is known to time events in dividing cells, although this has never been linked to spindle displacement. This mechanism involves the anaphase-promoting complex (APC), its activator Cdc20/Fizzy, its degradation target cyclin, and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK). Here we show that these components comprise a previously unrecognized timer for spindle displacement. In the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote, mitotic spindle displacement begins at a precise time, soon after chromosomes congress to the metaphase plate. We found that reducing the function of the proteasome, the APC, or Cdc20/Fizzy delayed spindle displacement. Conversely, inactivating CDK in prometaphase caused the spindle to displace early. The consequence of experimentally unlinking spindle displacement from this timing mechanism was the premature displacement of incompletely assembled components of the mitotic spindle. We conclude that in this system, asymmetric positioning of the mitotic spindle is normally delayed for a short time until the APC inactivates CDK, and that this delay ensures that the spindle does not begin to move until it is fully assembled. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that mitotic progression times spindle displacement in the asymmetric division of an animal cell. We speculate that this link between the cell cycle and asymmetric cell division might be evolutionarily conserved, because the mitotic spindle is displaced at a similar stage of mitosis during asymmetric cell divisions in diverse systems.