RGS17/RGSZ2, a novel regulator of Gi/o, Gz, and Gq signaling

To identify novel regulators of Galpha(o), the most abundant G-protein in brain, we used yeast two-hybrid screening with constitutively active Galpha(o) as bait and identified a new regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) protein, RGS17 (RGSZ2), as a novel human member of the RZ (or A) subfamily of RGS proteins. RGS17 contains an amino-terminal cysteine-rich motif and a carboxyl-terminal RGS domain with highest homology to hRGSZ1- and hRGS-Galpha-interacting protein. RGS17 RNA was strongly expressed as multiple species in cerebellum and other brain regions. The interactions between hRGS17 and active forms of Galpha(i1-3), Galpha(o), Galpha(z), or Galpha(q) but not Galpha(s) were detected by yeast two-hybrid assay, in vitro pull-down assay, and co-immunoprecipitation studies. Recombinant RGS17 acted as a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) on free Galpha(i2) and Galpha(o) under pre-steady-state conditions, and on M2-muscarinic receptor-activated Galpha(i1), Galpha(i2), Galpha(i3), Galpha(z), and Galpha(o) in steady-state GTPase assays in vitro. Unlike RGSZ1, which is highly selective for G(z), RGS17 exhibited limited selectivity for G(o) among G(i)/G(o) proteins. All RZ family members reduced dopamine-D2/Galpha(i)-mediated inhibition of cAMP formation and abolished thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor/Galpha(q)-mediated calcium mobilization. RGS17 is a new RZ member that preferentially inhibits receptor signaling via G(i/o), G(z), and G(q) over G(s) to enhance cAMP-dependent signaling and inhibit calcium signaling. Differences observed between in vitro GAP assays and whole-cell signaling suggest additional determinants of the G-protein specificity of RGS GAP effects that could include receptors and effectors.     

Functional expression of M(1), M(3) and M(5) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in yeast

The goal of this study was to functionally express the three G(q)-coupled muscarinic receptor subtypes, M(1), M(3) and M(5), in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Transformation of yeast with expression constructs coding for the full-length receptors resulted in very low numbers of detectable muscarinic binding sites (B(max) < 5 fmol/mg). Strikingly, deletion of the central portion of the third intracellular loops of the M(1), M(3) and M(5) muscarinic receptors resulted in dramatic increases in B(max) values (53-214 fmol/mg). To monitor productive receptor/G-protein coupling, we used specifically engineered yeast strains that required agonist-stimulated receptor/G-protein coupling for cell growth. These studies showed that the shortened versions of the M(1), M(3) and M(5) receptors were unable to productively interact with the endogenous yeast G protein alpha-subunit, Gpa1p, or a Gpa1 mutant subunit that contained C-terminal mammalian Galpha(s) sequence. In contrast, all three receptors gained the ability to efficiently couple to a Gpa1/Galpha(q) hybrid subunit containing C-terminal mammalian Galpha(q) sequence, indicating that the M(1), M(3) and M(5) muscarinic receptors retained proper G-protein coupling selectivity in yeast. This is the first study to report the expression of muscarinic receptors in a coupling-competent form in yeast. The strategy described here, which involves structural modification of both receptors and co-expressed G proteins, should facilitate the functional expression of other classes of G protein-coupled receptors in yeast.     

Galpha(16/z) chimeras efficiently link a wide range of G protein-coupled receptors to calcium mobilization

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a class of important therapeutic targets for drug discovery. The integration of GPCRs into contemporary high-throughput functional assays is critically dependent on the presence of appropriate G proteins. Given that different GPCRs can discriminate against distinct G proteins, a universal G protein adapter is extremely desirable. In this report, the authors evaluated two highly promiscuous Galpha(16/z) chimeras, 16z25 and 16z44, for their ability to translate GPCR activation into Ca(2+) mobilization using the fluorescence imaging plate reader (FLIPR) and aequorin. A panel of 24 G(s)- or G(i)-coupled receptors was examined for their functional association with the Galpha(16/z) chimeras. Although most of the GPCRs tested were incapable of inducing Ca(2+) mobilization upon their activation by specific agonists, the introduction of 16z25 or 16z44 allowed all of these GPCRs to mediate agonist-induced Ca(2+) mobilization. In contrast, only 16 of the GPCRs tested were capable of using Galpha(16) to mobilize intracellular Ca(2+). Analysis of dose-response curves obtained with the delta-opioid, dopamine D(1), and Xenopus melatonin Mel1c receptors revealed that the Galpha(16/z) chimeras possess better sensitivity than Galpha(16) in both the FLIPR and aequorin assays. Collectively, these studies help to validate the promiscuity of the Galpha(16/z) chimeras as well as their application in contemporary drug-screening assays that are based on ligand-induced Ca(2+) mobilization.     

Chimeric G proteins extend the range of insect cell-based functional assays for human G protein-coupled receptors

We previously described a functional assay for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) based on stably transformed insect cells and using the promiscuous G protein Galpha16. We now show that, compared with Galpha16, the use of chimeric Galphaq subunits with C-terminal modifications (qi5-HA, qo5-HA, or qz5-HA) significantly enhances the ability of insect cells to redirect Gi-coupled GPCRs into a Gq-type signal transduction pathway. We coexpressed human Gi-coupled GPCRs, G protein alpha subunits (either a chimeric Galphaq or Galpha16), and the calcium-sensitive reporter protein aequorin in Sf9 cells using a nonlytic protein expression system, and measured agonist-induced intracellular calcium flux using a luminometer. Three of the GPCRs (serotonin 1A, 1D, and dopamine D2) were functionally redirected into a Gq-type pathway when coexpressed with the chimeric G proteins, compared with only one (serotonin 1A) with Galpha16. We determined agonist concentration-response relationships for all three receptors, which yielded EC50 values comparable with those achieved in mammalian cell-based assay systems. However, three other Gi-coupled GPCRs (the opioid kappa1 and delta1 receptors, and serotonin 1E) were not coupled to calcium flux by either the G protein chimeras or Galpha16. Possible reasons and solutions for this result are discussed.     

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinase 2 regulates agonist-independent Gq/11 signaling from the mouse cytomegalovirus GPCR M33

The mouse cytomegalovirus M33 protein is highly homologous to mammalian G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) yet functions in an agonist-independent manner to activate a number of classical GPCR signal transduction pathways. M33 is functionally similar to the human cytomegalovirus-encoded US28 GPCR in its ability to induce inositol phosphate accumulation, activate NF-kappaB, and promote smooth muscle cell migration. This ability to promote cellular migration suggests a role for viral GPCRs like M33 in viral dissemination in vivo, and accordingly, M33 is required for efficient murine cytomegalovirus replication in the mouse. Although previous studies have identified several M33-induced signaling pathways, little is known regarding the membrane-proximal events involved in signaling and regulation of this receptor. In this study, we used recombinant retroviruses to express M33 in wild-type and Galpha(q/11)(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts and show that M33 couples directly to the G(q/11) signaling pathway to induce high levels of total inositol phosphates in an agonist-independent manner. Our data also show that GRK2 is a potent regulator of M33-induced G(q/11) signaling through its ability to phosphorylate M33 and sequester Galpha(q/11) proteins. Taken together, the results from this study provide the first genetic evidence of a viral GPCR coupling to a specific G protein signaling pathway as well as identify the first viral GPCR to be regulated specifically by both the catalytic activity of the GRK2 kinase domain and the Galpha(q/11) binding activity of the GRK2 RH domain.     

Galphaq-coupled receptor internalization specifically induced by Galphaq signaling. Regulation by EBP50

In the present report, we investigated the effect of ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein 50 (EBP50) expression on the agonist-induced internalization of the thromboxane A(2) beta receptor (TPbeta receptor). Interestingly, we found that EBP50 almost completely blocked TPbeta receptor internalization, which could not be reversed by overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases and arrestins. Because we recently demonstrated that EBP50 can bind to and inhibit Galpha(q), we next studied whether Galpha(q) signaling could induce TPbeta receptor internalization, addressing the long standing question about the relationship between GPCR signaling and their internalization. Expression of a constitutively active Galpha(q) mutant (Galpha(q)-R183C) resulted in a robust internalization of the TPbeta receptor, which was unaffected by expression of dominant negative mutants of arrestin-2 and -3, but inhibited by expression of EBP50 or dynamin-K44A, a dominant negative mutant of dynamin. Phospholipase Cbeta and protein kinase C did not appear to significantly contribute to internalization of the TPbeta receptor, suggesting that Galpha(q) induces receptor internalization through a phospholipase Cbeta- and protein kinase C-independent pathway. Surprisingly, there appears to be specificity in Galpha protein-mediated GPCR internalization. Galpha(q)-R183C also induced the internalization of CXCR4 (Galpha(q)-coupled), whereas it failed to do so for the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (Galpha(s)-coupled). Moreover, Galpha(s)-R201C, a constitutively active form of Galpha(s), had no effect on internalization of the TPbeta, CXCR4, and beta(2)-adrenergic receptors. Thus, we showed that Galpha protein signaling can lead to internalization of GPCRs, with specificity in both the Galpha proteins and GPCRs that are involved. Furthermore, a new function has been described for EBP50 in its capacity to inhibit receptor endocytosis.     

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor initiates multiple signaling pathways by exclusively coupling to G(q/11) proteins

The agonist-bound gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor engages several distinct signaling cascades, and it has recently been proposed that coupling of a single type of receptor to multiple G proteins (G(q), G(s), and G(i)) is responsible for this behavior. GnRH-dependent signaling was studied in gonadotropic alphaT3-1 cells endogenously expressing the murine receptor and in CHO-K1 (CHO#3) and COS-7 cells transfected with the human GnRH receptor cDNA. In all cell systems studied, GnRH-induced phospholipase C activation and Ca(2+) mobilization was pertussis toxin-insensitive, as was GnRH-mediated extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Whereas the G(i)-coupled m2 muscarinic receptor interacted with a chimeric G(s) protein (G(s)i5) containing the C-terminal five amino acids of Galpha(i2), the human GnRH receptor was unable to activate the G protein chimera. GnRH challenge of alphaT3-1, CHO#3 and of GnRH receptor-expressing COS-7 cells did not result in agonist-dependent cAMP formation. GnRH challenge of CHO#3 cells expressing a cAMP-responsive element-driven firefly luciferase did not result in increased reporter gene expression. However, coexpression of the human GnRH receptor and adenylyl cyclase I in COS-7 cells led to clearly discernible GnRH-dependent cAMP formation subsequent to GnRH-elicited rises in [Ca(2+)](i). In alphaT3-1 and CHO#3 cell membranes, addition of [alpha-(32)P]GTP azidoanilide resulted in GnRH receptor-dependent labeling of Galpha(q/11) but not of Galpha(i), Galpha(s) or Galpha(12/13) proteins. Thus, the murine and human GnRH receptors exclusively couple to G proteins of the G(q/11) family. Multiple GnRH-dependent signaling pathways are therefore initiated downstream of the receptor/G protein interface and are not indicative of a multiple G protein coupling potential of the GnRH receptor.     

Molecular dissection of G protein preference using Gsalpha chimeras reveals novel ligand signaling of GPCRs

Although only 16 genes have been identified in mammals, several Galpha subunits can be simultaneously activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to modulate their complicated functions. Current GPCR assays are limited in the evaluation of selective Galpha activation, thus not allowing a comprehensive pathway screening. Because adenylyl cyclases are directly activated by G(s)alpha and the carboxyl termini of the various Galpha proteins determine their receptor coupling specificity, we proposed a set of chimeric G(s)alpha where the COOH-terminal five amino acids are replaced by those of other Galpha proteins and used these to dissect the potential Galpha linked to a given GPCR. Unlike G(q)alpha, G(12)alpha, and G(i)alpha outputs, compounding the signals from several Galpha members, the chimeric G(s)alpha proteins provide a superior molecular approach that reflects the previously uncharacterized pathways of GPCRs under the same cAMP platform. This is, to our knowledge, the first time allowing verification of the whole spectrum of Galpha coupling preference of adenosine A1 receptor, reported to couple to multiple G proteins and modulate many physiological processes. Furthermore, we were able to distinguish the uncharacterized pathways between the two neuromedin U receptors (NMURs), which distribute differently but are stimulated by a common agonist. In contrast to the G(q) signals mainly conducted by NMUR1, NMUR2 routed preferentially to the G(i) pathways. Dissecting the potential Galpha coupling to these GPCRs will promote an understanding of their physiological roles and benefit the pharmaceutical development of agonists/antagonists by exploiting the selective affinity toward a certain Galpha subclass.     

Selective regulation of Galpha(q/11) by an RGS domain in the G protein-coupled receptor kinase, GRK2

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are well characterized regulators of G protein-coupled receptors, whereas regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins directly control the activity of G protein alpha subunits. Interestingly, a recent report (Siderovski, D. P., Hessel, A., Chung, S., Mak, T. W., and Tyers, M. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 211-212) identified a region within the N terminus of GRKs that contained homology to RGS domains. Given that RGS domains demonstrate AlF(4)(-)-dependent binding to G protein alpha subunits, we tested the ability of G proteins from a crude bovine brain extract to bind to GRK affinity columns in the absence or presence of AlF(4)(-). This revealed the specific ability of bovine brain Galpha(q/11) to bind to both GRK2 and GRK3 in an AlF(4)(-)-dependent manner. In contrast, Galpha(s), Galpha(i), and Galpha(12/13) did not bind to GRK2 or GRK3 despite their presence in the extract. Additional studies revealed that bovine brain Galpha(q/11) could also bind to an N-terminal construct of GRK2, while no binding of Galpha(q/11), Galpha(s), Galpha(i), or Galpha(12/13) to comparable constructs of GRK5 or GRK6 was observed. Experiments using purified Galpha(q) revealed significant binding of both Galpha(q) GDP/AlF(4)(-) and Galpha(q)(GTPgammaS), but not Galpha(q)(GDP), to GRK2. Activation-dependent binding was also observed in both COS-1 and HEK293 cells as GRK2 significantly co-immunoprecipitated constitutively active Galpha(q)(R183C) but not wild type Galpha(q). In vitro analysis revealed that GRK2 possesses weak GAP activity toward Galpha(q) that is dependent on the presence of a G protein-coupled receptor. However, GRK2 effectively inhibited Galpha(q)-mediated activation of phospholipase C-beta both in vitro and in cells, possibly through sequestration of activated Galpha(q). These data suggest that a subfamily of the GRKs may be bifunctional regulators of G protein-coupled receptor signaling operating directly on both receptors and G proteins.     

G protein-coupled receptor Kinase 2/G alpha q/11 interaction. A novel surface on a regulator of G protein signaling homology domain for binding G alpha subunits

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transduce cellular signals from hormones, neurotransmitters, light, and odorants by activating heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding (G) proteins. For many GPCRs, short term regulation is initiated by agonist-dependent phosphorylation by GPCR kinases (GRKs), such as GRK2, resulting in G protein/receptor uncoupling. GRK2 also regulates signaling by binding G alpha(q/ll) and inhibiting G alpha(q) stimulation of the effector phospholipase C beta. The binding site for G alpha(q/ll) resides within the amino-terminal domain of GRK2, which is homologous to the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) family of proteins. To map the Galpha(q/ll) binding site on GRK2, we carried out site-directed mutagenesis of the RGS homology (RH) domain and identified eight residues, which when mutated, alter binding to G alpha(q/ll). These mutations do not alter the ability of full-length GRK2 to phosphorylate rhodopsin, an activity that also requires the amino-terminal domain. Mutations causing G alpha(q/ll) binding defects impair recruitment to the plasma membrane by activated G alpha(q) and regulation of G alpha(q)-stimulated phospholipase C beta activity when introduced into full-length GRK2. Two different protein interaction sites have previously been identified on RH domains. The G alpha binding sites on RGS4 and RGS9, called the "A" site, is localized to the loops between helices alpha 3 and alpha 4, alpha 5 and alpha 6, and alpha 7 and alpha 8. The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) binding site of axin involves residues on alpha helices 3, 4, and 5 (the "B" site) of its RH domain. We demonstrate that the G alpha(q/ll) binding site on the GRK2 RH domain is distinct from the "A" and "B" sites and maps primarily to the COOH terminus of its alpha 5 helix. We suggest that this novel protein interaction site on an RH domain be designated the "C" site.     

A comprehensive structure-function map of the intracellular surface of the human C5a receptor. II. Elucidation of G protein specificity determinants

Within any given cell many G protein-coupled receptors are expressed in the presence of multiple G proteins, yet most receptors couple to a specific subset of G proteins to elicit their programmed response. Numerous studies demonstrate that the carboxyl-terminal five amino acids of the Galpha subunits are a major determinant of specificity, however the receptor determinants of specificity are less clear. We have used a collection of 133 functional mutants of the C5a receptor obtained in a mutagenesis screen targeting the intracellular loops and the carboxyl terminus (Matsumoto, M. L., Narzinski, K., Kiser, P. D., Nikiforovich, G. V., and Baranski, T. J. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 3105-3121) to investigate how specificity is encoded. Each mutant, originally selected for its ability to signal through a nearly full-length Galpha(i) in yeast, was tested to see whether it could activate three versions of chimeric Galpha subunits consisting of Gpa1 fused to the carboxyl-terminal five amino acids of Galpha(i), Galpha(q), or Galpha(s) in yeast. Surprisingly the carboxyl-terminal tail of the C5a receptor is the most important specificity determinant in that nearly all mutants in this region showed a gain in coupling to Galpha(q) and/or Galpha(s). More than half of the receptors mutated in the second intracellular loop also demonstrated broadened G protein coupling. Given a lack of selective advantage for this broadened signaling in the initial screen, we propose a model in which the carboxyl-terminal tail acts together with the intracellular loops to generate a specificity filter for receptor-G protein interactions that functions primarily to restrict access of incorrect G proteins to the receptor.     

Functional coupling with Galpha(q) and Galpha(i1) protein subunits promotes high-affinity agonist binding to the neurotensin receptor NTS-1 expressed in Escherichia coli

To analyze the coupling of Galpha subunits to the rat neurotensin receptor NTS-1 (NTR), fusion proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli with various Galpha subunits covalently linked to the receptor C-terminus. The presence of Galpha(q) or Galpha(i/q), in which the six C-terminal residues of Galpha(i1) were replaced with those from Galpha(q), increased the percentage of receptors in the agonist high-affinity state. This effect was less pronounced for wild-type Galpha(i1) and not observed for Galpha(i/s). Functional coupling of neurotensin receptor to Galpha was demonstrated by neurotensin-induced [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding for the Galpha(q), Galpha(i/q) and Galpha(i1) subunits, but not for Galpha(i/s). Our results extend previous findings of the dual coupling of NTR to pertussis toxin-sensitive and -insensitive G-proteins in Chinese hamster ovary cells with preference for the latter.     

A novel mechanism for JAK2 activation by a G protein-coupled receptor, the CCK2R: implication of this signaling pathway in pancreatic tumor models

To date very few G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been shown to be connected to the Janus kinase (JAK)/STAT pathway. Thus our understanding of the mechanisms involved in the activation of this signaling pathway by GPCRs remains limited. In addition, little is known about the role of the JAK pathway in the physiological or pathophysiological functions of GPCRs. Here, we described a new mechanism of JAK activation that involves Galpha(q) proteins. Indeed, transfection of a constitutively activated mutant of Galpha(q) (Q209L) in COS-7 cells demonstrated that Galpha(q) is able to associate and activate JAK2. In addition, we showed that this mechanism is used to activate JAK2 by a GPCR principally coupled to G(q), the CCK2 receptor (CCK2R), and involves a highly conserved sequence in GPCRs, the NPXXY motif. In a pancreatic tumor cell line expressing the endogenous CCK2R, we demonstrated the activation of the JAK2/STAT3 pathway by this receptor and the involvement of this signaling pathway in the proliferative effects of the CCK2R. In addition, we showed in vivo that the targeted CCK2R expression in pancreas of Elas-CCK2 mice leads to the activation of JAK2 and STAT3. This process may contribute to the increase of pancreas growth as well as the formation of preneoplastic lesions leading to pancreatic tumor development observed in these transgenic animals.     

Functional selectivity of G protein signaling by agonist peptides and thrombin for the protease-activated receptor-1

Thrombin activates protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) by cleavage of the amino terminus to unmask a tethered ligand. Although peptide analogs can activate PAR-1, we show that the functional responses mediated via PAR-1 differ between the agonists. Thrombin caused endothelial monolayer permeability and mobilized intracellular calcium with EC(50) values of 0.1 and 1.7 nm, respectively. The opposite order of activation was observed for agonist peptide (SFLLRN-CONH(2) or TFLLRNKPDK) activation. The addition of inactivated thrombin did not affect agonist peptide signaling, suggesting that the differences in activation mechanisms are intramolecular in origin. Although activation of PAR-1 or PAR-2 by agonist peptides induced calcium mobilization, only PAR-1 activation affected barrier function. Induced barrier permeability is likely to be Galpha(12/13)-mediated as chelation of Galpha(q)-mediated intracellular calcium with BAPTA-AM, pertussis toxin inhibition of Galpha(i/o), or GM6001 inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase had no effect, whereas Y-27632 inhibition of the Galpha(12/13)-mediated Rho kinase abrogated the response. Similarly, calcium mobilization is Galpha(q)-mediated and independent of Galpha(i/o) and Galpha(12/13) because pertussis toxin Y-27632 and had no effect, whereas U-73122 inhibition of phospholipase C-beta blocked the response. It is therefore likely that changes in permeability reflect Galpha(12/13) activation, and changes in calcium reflect Galpha(q) activation, implying that the pharmacological differences between agonists are likely caused by the ability of the receptor to activate Galpha(12/13) or Galpha(q). This functional selectivity was characterized quantitatively by a mathematical model describing each step leading to Rho activation and/or calcium mobilization. This model provides an estimate that peptide activation alters receptor/G protein binding to favor Galpha(q) activation over Galpha(12/13) by approximately 800-fold.     

Diversity of G proteins in Lepidopteran cell lines: partial sequences of six G protein alpha subunits

The aim of this work was to sample the diversity of G protein alpha subunits in lepidopteran insect cell lines. Here we report the amplification by degenerate PCR of partial sequences representing six G protein alpha subunits from three different lepidopteran insect cell lines. Sequence comparisons with known G protein alpha subunits indicate that the Sf9, Ld and High Five cell lines each contain (at least) one Galpha(q)-like and one Galpha(i)-like Galpha subunit. All six PCR products are unique at the nucleotide level, but the translation products of the three Galpha q-like partial clones (Sf9-Galpha 1, Ld-Galpha 1, and Hi5-Galpha 1) are identical, as are the translation products of the three Galpha i-like partial clones (Sf9-Galpha 2, Ld-Galpha 2, and Hi5-Galpha 2). Both the Galpha(q)-like and Galpha(i)-like translation products are identical to known Galpha subunits from other Lepidoptera, are highly similar (88-98%) to Galpha subunits from other invertebrates including mosquitoes, fruit flies, lobsters, crabs, and snails, and are also highly similar (88-90%) to known mammalian Galpha subunits. Identification of G protein alpha subunits in lepidopteran cell lines will assist in host cell line selection when insect cell lines are used for the pharmacological analysis of human GPCRs.     

A crucial role for Galphaq/11, but not Galphai/o or Galphas, in gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor-mediated cell growth inhibition

GnRH acts on its cognate receptor in pituitary gonadotropes to regulate the biosynthesis and secretion of gonadotropins. It may also have direct extrapituitary actions, including inhibition of cell growth in reproductive malignancies, in which GnRH activation of the MAPK cascades is thought to play a pivotal role. In extrapituitary tissues, GnRH receptor signaling has been postulated to involve coupling of the receptor to different G proteins. We examined the ability of the GnRH receptor to couple directly to Galpha(q/11), Galpha(i/o), and Galpha(s), their roles in the activation of the MAPK cascades, and the subsequent cellular effects. We show that in Galpha(q/11)-negative cells stably expressing the GnRH receptor, GnRH did not induce activation of ERK, jun-N-terminal kinase, or P38 MAPK. In contrast to Galpha(i) or chimeric Galpha(qi5), transfection of Galpha(q) cDNA enabled GnRH to induce phosphorylation of ERK, jun-N-terminal kinase, and P38. Furthermore, no GnRH-mediated cAMP response or inhibition of isoproterenol-induced cAMP accumulation was observed. In another cellular background, [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays confirmed that the GnRH receptor was unable to directly couple to Galpha(i) but could directly interact with Galpha(q/11). Interestingly, GnRH stimulated a marked reduction in cell growth only in cells expressing Galpha(q), and this inhibition could be significantly rescued by blocking ERK activation. We therefore provide direct evidence, in multiple cellular backgrounds, that coupling of the GnRH receptor to Galpha(q/11), but not to Galpha(i/o) or Galpha(s), and consequent activation of ERK plays a crucial role in GnRH-mediated cell death.     

Reciprocal signaling between heterotrimeric G proteins and the p21-stimulated protein kinase.

p21-activated protein kinase (PAK)-1 phosphorylated Galpha(z), a member of the Galpha(i) family that is found in the brain, platelets, and adrenal medulla. Phosphorylation approached 1 mol of phosphate/mol of Galpha(z) in vitro. In transfected cells, Galpha(z) was phosphorylated both by wild-type PAK1 when stimulated by the GTP-binding protein Rac1 and by constitutively active PAK1 mutants. In vitro, phosphorylation occurred only at Ser(16), one of two Ser residues that are the major substrate sites for protein kinase C (PKC). PAK1 did not phosphorylate other Galpha subunits (i1, i2, i3, o, s, or q). PAK1-phosphorylated Galpha(z) was resistant both to RGSZ1, a G(z)-selective GTPase-activating protein (GAP), and to RGS4, a relatively nonselective GAP for the G(i) and G(q) families of G proteins. Phosphorylation of Ser(27) by PKC did not alter sensitivity to either GAP. The previously described inhibition of G(z) GAPs by PKC is therefore mediated by phosphorylation of Ser(16). Phosphorylation of either Ser(16) by PAK1 or Ser(27) by PKC decreased the affinity of Galpha(z) for Gbetagamma; phosphorylation of both residues by PKC caused no further effect. PAK1 thus regulates Galpha(z) function by attenuating the inhibitory effects of both GAPs and Gbetagamma. In this context, the kinase activity of PAK1 toward several protein substrates was directly inhibited by Gbetagamma, suggesting that PAK1 acts as a Gbetagamma-regulated effector protein. This inhibition of mammalian PAK1 by Gbetagamma contrasts with the stimulation of the PAK homolog Ste20p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the Gbetagamma homolog Ste4p/Ste18p.     

Characterization of the GRK2 binding site of Galphaq

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) transmit signals from membrane bound G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to intracellular effector proteins. The G(q) subfamily of Galpha subunits couples GPCR activation to the enzymatic activity of phospholipase C-beta (PLC-beta). Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins bind to activated Galpha subunits, including Galpha(q), and regulate Galpha signaling by acting as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs), increasing the rate of the intrinsic GTPase activity, or by acting as effector antagonists for Galpha subunits. GPCR kinases (GRKs) phosphorylate agonist-bound receptors in the first step of receptor desensitization. The amino termini of all GRKs contain an RGS homology (RH) domain, and binding of the GRK2 RH domain to Galpha(q) attenuates PLC-beta activity. The RH domain of GRK2 interacts with Galpha(q/11) through a novel Galpha binding surface termed the "C" site. Here, molecular modeling of the Galpha(q).GRK2 complex and site-directed mutagenesis of Galpha(q) were used to identify residues in Galpha(q) that interact with GRK2. The model identifies Pro(185) in Switch I of Galpha(q) as being at the crux of the interface, and mutation of this residue to lysine disrupts Galpha(q) binding to the GRK2-RH domain. Switch III also appears to play a role in GRK2 binding because the mutations Galpha(q)-V240A, Galpha(q)-D243A, both residues within Switch III, and Galpha(q)-Q152A, a residue that structurally supports Switch III, are defective in binding GRK2. Furthermore, GRK2-mediated inhibition of Galpha(q)-Q152A-R183C-stimulated inositol phosphate release is reduced in comparison to Galpha(q)-R183C. Interestingly, the model also predicts that residues in the helical domain of Galpha(q) interact with GRK2. In fact, the mutants Galpha(q)-K77A, Galpha(q)-L78D, Galpha(q)-Q81A, and Galpha(q)-R92A have reduced binding to the GRK2-RH domain. Finally, although the mutant Galpha(q)-T187K has greatly reduced binding to RGS2 and RGS4, it has little to no effect on binding to GRK2. Thus the RH domain A and C sites for Galpha(q) interaction rely on contacts with distinct regions and different Switch I residues in Galpha(q).