Prognostic value of pre-infusion tumor growth rate for patients with lymphoma receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Background aimsChimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) prolongs survival for patients with refractory or relapsed lymphoma, yet its efficacy is affected by the tumor burden. The relevance of tumor kinetics before infusion is unknown. We aimed to study the prognostic value of the pre-infusion tumor growth rate (TGR^pre-BL) for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).MethodsConsecutive patients with available pre-baseline (pre-BL) and baseline (BL) computed tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan before CART were included. TGR was determined as change of Lugano criteria-based tumor burden between pre-BL, BL and follow-up examinations (FU) in relation to days between imaging exams. Overall response rate (ORR), depth or response (DoR) and PFS were determined based on Lugano criteria. Multivariate regression analysis studied association of TGR with ORR and DoR. Proportional Cox regression analysis studied association of TGR with PFS and OS.ResultsIn total, 62 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median TGR^pre-BL was 7.5 mm²/d (interquartile range –14.6 mm²/d to 48.7 mm²/d); TGR^pre-BL was positive (TGR^{pre-BL POS}) in 58% of patients and negative (TGR^{pre-BL NEG}, indicating tumor shrinkage) in 42% of patients. Patients who were TGR^{pre-BL POS} had a 90-day (FU2) ORR of 62%, a DoR of –86% and a median PFS of 124 days. Patients who were TGR^{pre-BL NEG} had a 90-day ORR of 44%, DoR of –47% and a median PFS of 105 days. ORR and DoR were not associated with slower TGR (P = 0.751, P = 0.198). Patients with an increase of TGR from pre-BL over BL to 30-day FU (FU1) ≥100% (TGR^{pre-BL-to-FU1≥100%}) showed a significant association with shorter median PFS (31 days versus 343 days, P = 0.002) and shorter median OS after CART (93 days versus not reached, P < 0.001), compared with patients with TGR^{pre-BL-to-FU1<100%}.ConclusionsIn the context of CART, differences in pre-infusion tumor kinetics showed minor differences in ORR, DoR, PFS and OS, whereas the change of the TGR from pre-BL to 30-day FU significantly stratified PFS and OS. In this patient population of refractory or relapsed lymphomas, TGR is readily available based on pre-BL imaging, and its change throughout CART should be explored as a potential novel imaging biomarker of early response.     

The predictive efficacy of tumor mutation burden in immunotherapy across multiple cancer types: A meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis

PurposeTo explore the predictive efficacy of tumor mutation burden (TMB) as a potential biomarker for cancer patients treated with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science for clinical studies (published between Jan 1, 2014 and Aug 30, 2021) comparing immunotherapy patients with high TMB to patients with low TMB. Our main endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), durable clinical benefit (DCB), overall survival (OS) and progress-free Survival (PFS). Moreover, we downloaded simple nucleotide variation (SNV) data of 33 major cancer types from the TCGA database as non-ICIs group, and compared the high TMB patients’ OS between the non-ICIs group and meta-analysis results.ResultsOf 10,450 identified studies, 41 were eligible and were included in our analysis (7713 participants). Compared with low TMB patients receiving ICIs, high TMB yielded a better ORR (RR = 2.73; 95% CI: 2.31–3.22; P = 0.043) and DCB (RR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.64–2.28; P = 0.356), and a significantly increased OS (HR =0.24; 95% CI: 0.21–0.28; P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.34–0.42; P < 0.001). Furthermore, compared with non-ICIs group from the TCGA database, immunotherapy can improve OS in some cancer types with high TMB and better prognosis, including colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and pan-cancer.ConclusionTMB is a promising therapeutic and prognostic biomarker for immunotherapy, which indicates a better ORR, DCB, OS and PFS. If there is a standard for TMB assessment and cut-off, it could improve the management of different cancers.     

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between bridging therapy and outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in patients with large B cell lymphoma

BackgroundThe existing evidence about the impact of bridging therapy (BT) on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is conflicting. Therefore, we reviewed all available evidence to examine the association between BT and CAR-T therapy outcomes by systematic review and meta-analysis approach.MethodsTwo reviewers independently searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library to identify all records that described BT for LBCL treated with CAR-T. We then applied a fixed- or random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and rate ratio (RRs) for efficacy and safety endpoints and assessed differences across various BT modalities. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate study quality.ResultsTwenty-six reports from 24 studies involving 2014 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled results showed that patients requiring BT had significantly worse 1-year overall survival rate (RR = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68–0.85, P < 0.001), 1-year progression-free survival rate (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.60–0.85, P < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.07–1.69, P = 0.01), overall response rate (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.81–0.95, P = 0.001), complete response rate (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.65–0.93, P = 0.005), and grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (RR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.10–1.87, P = 0.007), and tended to have poorer overall survival (HR = 1.42, 95% CI 0.99–2.02, P = 0.056) and grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (RR = 1.59, 95% CI 0.92–2.75, P = 0.096). Prolonged cytopenias were the common toxicity event associated with BT. Radiotherapy may serve as a promising BT option that can provide safe and effective disease control for patients with LBCL before CAR-T infusion. The inconsistency of patient baselines in the current study hindered further comparisons between different BT modalities. Most of the available evidence was rated as low quality because of concerns over low comparability.ConclusionBT appears to be associated with comparatively poor efficacy and safety outcomes after CAR-T infusion. However, due to the considerable heterogeneity between the BT and non-BT cohorts at disease baseline, no definitive conclusions can be made for the true impact of BT on CAR-T until further randomized studies are conducted.     

Effects of locoregional radiotherapy in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A real-world study

BackgroundTo evaluate the value of locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT) in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (dmNPC) and identify predictive factors for additional LRRT after palliative chemotherapy (PCT).MethodsOverall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Patients who underwent PCT and LRRT were categorized as the PCT+LRRT group; patients who only received palliative chemotherapy were categorized as the PCT group. Oligometastatic diseases (OMD) was defined as ≤5 metastatic lesions and ≤2 metastatic organs.ResultsA total of 168 patients were included for this study. The median OS of patients in the PCT+LRRT group was significantly higher than those in the PCT group (57 months vs. 22 months, P<0.001). Multivariate analyses (MVA) showed that LRRT (HR=0.533, 95% CI: 0.319–0.889, P = 0.016) and OMD (HR=0.548, 95% CI: 0.331–0.907, P = 0.019) were independent prognostic factors for dmNPC. Furthermore, Kaplan–Meier analyses showed that the 3-year OS of patients who received LRRT was significantly better than those who did not receive LRRT in the OMD subgroup (66.3% vs. 25.2%, P<0.001). While, the 3-year OS of patients who received LRRT and without LRRT was no different in the polymetastatic disease (PMD) subgroup (38.9% vs.11.5%, P = 0.115). MVA showed that LRRT was a favorable prognosticator in the OMD subgroup (HR=0.308, 95% CI: 0.159–0.598; P<0.001), and not a favorable prognosticator in the PMD subgroup (HR=0.510, 95% CI: 0.256–1.014, P = 0.055).ConclusionsLRRT has the potential to prolong OS in NPC patients with de novo OMD. These results suggest that OMD is a potential indicator for filtering beneficiaries from LRRT.     

Kanglaite injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy for stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of 27 RCTs

BackgroundKanglaite injection (KLT) is a broad-spectrum anti-tumor drug, which is extracted from the seeds of the Chinese medicinal herb Coix lacryma-jobi, and has been widely used for the treatment of advanced lung cancer.PurposeTo evaluate the combined effects of Kanglaite injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) on patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Study designA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).Materials and methodsTwelve databases were searched from their inceptions until July 05, 2019. All the RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of Kanglaite injection plus PBC versus PBC alone were selected. Analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3, Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0 and Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA). Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the primary endpoint, objective response rate (ORR), survival rate, quality of life (QOL), cellular immunity function, and toxicities were defined as the secondary endpoints.ResultsTwenty-seven RCTs recruiting 2,243 patients with stage III/IV NSCLC were included. The results showed that, compared with PBC alone, Kanglaite injection plus PBC improved DCR (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.15–1.26, p < 0.00001), ORR (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.31–1.60, p < 0.00001), 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.02–1.43, p = 0.03), QOL (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.25–1.40, p < 0.00001), CD4⁺ T cells (WMD = 4.86, 95% CI 4.00–5.73, p < 0.00001), CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio (WMD = 0.19, 95% CI 0.07–0.31, p < 0.002), and reduced severe toxicities by 59% (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.33–0.51, p < 0.00001). Most results were robust and the quality of evidence was from moderate to low.ConclusionsKanglaite injection in combination with PBC showed significantly higher efficacy than PBC alone in the treatment of stage III/IV NSCLC. Moreover, the combination therapy can improve cellular immunity and attenuate the severe toxicities caused by chemotherapy. However, high-quality RCTs are warranted to further assess the effects of the combined therapy.     

The prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in patients with melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been investigated as a potential prognostic biomarker to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and disease progression in melanoma patients, yet results remain inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to illustrate the prognostic value of ctDNA in melanoma.ObjectivesTo describe the clinical prognostic value of ctDNA for melanoma patients.MethodsSearched for eligible articles from Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association between ctDNA at baseline or during treatment and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsA total of 9 articles were obtained, involving 617 melanoma patients. The pooled HRs revealed that compared with baseline undetectable ctDNA patients, detectable ctDNA was highly correlated with poor OS (HR 2.91, 95% CI: 2.22–3.82; p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 2.75, 95% CI: 1.98–3.83; p < 0.001). A meta-analysis of these adjusted HRs was performed and confirmed that ctDNA collected at baseline was associated with poorer OS/PFS (OS: HR 3.00, 95% CI 2.19–4.11, p < 0.001/PFS: HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.77–4.06, p < 0.001). During treatment, a significant association was shown between ctDNA and poorer OS/PFS (OS: HR 6.26, 95% CI 2.48–15.80, p < 0.001; PFS: HR 4.93, 95% CI 2.36–10.33, p < 0.001).ConclusionInvestigation and application of ctDNA will improve "liquid biopsy" and play a role in early prediction, monitoring disease progression and precise adjusting treatment strategies in melanoma patients.     

Positive prostate biopsy following radiotherapy can predict metastasis-free survival in localized prostate cancer

Background/aim(s)To determine the impact of post-treatment biopsy results on 10-year metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) in localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with high-dose radiotherapy (RT).Materials/MethodsRetrospective analysis of 232 patients with T1c-T3bN0M0 PCa who underwent a prostate biopsy 24–36 months after high-dose RT. Biopsies were categorized as positive biopsy (PB) if H&E staining showed evidence of residual malignancy and negative biopsy (NB) if no malignant cells were present. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 10-year MFS, OS and CSS rates were calculated for each group and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios. The median follow-up was 124 months (range 26–267).ResultsSixty-two of 232 (26.7%) patients had post-treatment positive biopsies (PB). A positive post-treatment biopsy was significantly associated with a lower 10-year MFS (78.4% vs. 95.4%, p = 0.001, HR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.8–8.3). Although patients with PB had worse outcomes that those with NB, we could not show a statistically significant difference in OS (81.0% vs. 87.9%, p = 0.282, HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.7–2.3) or CSS (96.2% vs. 99.4% (p = 0.201, HR. 2.4, 95% CI: 0.6–9.7). After multivariate analysis, the strongest predictor of MFS was the post-treatment biopsy status (p < 0.001, HR: 5.4, 95% CI 2.26–12.85) followed by Gleason score (p = 0.002, HR: 2.24, 95% CI 1.33–3.79).ConclusionA positive biopsy following RT can predict MFS in localized prostate cancer. These data highlight the relevance of achieving a local control and support the use of aggressive local therapeutic interventions for PCa.     

Preoperative red blood cell distribution width as an independent prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the prognostic value of preoperative red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).MethodsClinicopathological data of 230 patients with mRCC treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and the Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2008 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified according to the optimal cut-off value of RDW calculated using X-tile software. The prognostic value of RDW was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve with log-rank test and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 230 patients were included. The optimal cut-off value of RDW obtained using X-tile software was 13.1%. The median Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) of all populations were 12.06 months (IQR: 4.73–36.9) and 32.20 months (IQR: 13.73–69.46), respectively. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that patients with high RDW had worse PFS and OS than those with low RDW (median PFS of 9.7 months vs. 17.9 months, P = 0.002, and median OS of 27.8 months vs. 45.1 months, P = 0.012, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that RDW was an independent risk factor for PFS (HR: 1.505; 95% CI: 1.111–2.037; P = 0.008) and OS (HR: 1.626; 95% CI: 1.164–2.272; P = 0.004) in mRCC after cytoreductive nephrectomy.ConclusionPreoperative RDW was independently associated with PFS and OS in patients with mRCC and may be a potential predictor of survival outcomes in mRCC.     

Toremifene and tamoxifen have similar efficacy in the treatment of patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

A meta-analysis of randomized trials was performed to compare the efficacy of toremifene (TOR) with tamoxifen (TAM) in patients with breast cancer. A total of 4,768 intention-to-treat patients from nine randomized trials were identified, with 2,587 patients in TOR group and 2,181 patients in TAM group. The primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). The ORR for TOR group was 26.2 % (303/1,156), whereas the ORR for TAM group was 25.2 % (284/1,128). The pooled RR suggested that the ORR were not statistically different between the two therapeutic groups (RR 1.04, 95 % CI 0.91–1.20, P = 0.57). The median TTP was 6.7 months for the TOR group and 9.7 months for the TAM group. The median OS was 30.1 months for the TOR group and 31.7 months for the TAM group. There were no significant difference in TTP and OS between two therapeutic groups (for TTP: HR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.82–1.00; for OS: HR 1.02, 95 % CI 0.91–1.15). Adverse events were generally similar in two therapeutic groups, but TOR may cause fewer vaginal bleeding (4.0 vs. 6.7 %, P < 0.01), headache (0.2 vs. 3.1 %, P = 0.02) and thromboembolic events (4.7 vs. 7.0 %, P = 0.04). Sensitivity analyses were performed by deleting a single study each time; all the results were not materially altered. In summary, the results of this meta-analysis suggest that TOR and TAM have similar efficacy in the treatment of patients with breast cancer.     

Adoptive γδT-cell transfer alone or combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer

Background aimsAfter therapy with platinum, 5-fluorouracil and taxane, no further recommended therapy is available for recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer (r/mEC). Here the authors report two phase 1 trials of adoptive γδT-cell therapy, one for treatment-refractory r/mEC (γδT-monotherapy-P1, UMIN000001419) and the other for r/mEC with no prior systemic therapy (DCF-γδT-P1, UMIN000008097).MethodsFor γδT-monotherapy-P1, patients received four weekly and four biweekly injections of autologous γδT cells. For DCF-γδT-P1, patients received docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (60 mg/m²) and cisplatin (60 mg/m²) on day 1 and continuous injection of 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m²/day) on days 1–5 of each 28-day cycle; additionally, they received autologous γδT-cell injections on day 15 and day 22 of each cycle.ResultsTwenty-six patients were enrolled for γδT-monotherapy-P1. No severe adverse events were associated with γδT-cell therapy. Median overall survival was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3–10.0), and median progression-free survival was 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.7–2.8). Eighteen patients received DCF-γδT-P1. All treatment-related adverse events were associated with DCF chemotherapy, not γδT injection. Median overall survival was 13.4 months (95% CI, 6.7–not reached), and median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.5–5.7). The response rate and disease control rate were 39% and 78%, respectively.ConclusionsThe use of γδT-cell immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy was safe and feasible for r/mEC patients. Although the authors failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit of γδT-monotherapy-P1, survival benefits were observed in the DCF-γδT-P1 trial.     

Beyond the 5-year milestone: Long-term survivorship of melanoma patients treated off-trial with anti-PD-1

Little is known about the long-term outcomes of anti-PD-1 treated patients with melanoma beyond 5 years, especially for patients treated off clinical trials. This retrospective cohort study includes patients with unresectable stage III/IV nonuveal melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 off-trial at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2014 and 2017 who survived at least 5 years following their first anti-PD-1 dose (N = 139). We characterized overall survival (OS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS) estimates, treatment-free survival rates, and subsequent treatment courses. Median follow-up among 5-plus year survivors (N = 125) was 78.4 months (range 60.0–96.3). OS at year 7 (2 years post 5-year landmark) was 90.1% (95% CI: 83.0%–94.3%). Fourteen deaths occurred, seven due to melanoma. MSS at year 7 (2 years post 5-year landmark) was 95.0% (95% CI: 33.5%–95.2%). In patients who completed anti-PD-1 based therapy and did not require subsequent treatment by 5 years (N = 80), the probability of not requiring additional treatment for an additional 2 years was 95.7% (95% CI: 91.0%–100%). Patients treated with anti-PD-1 regimens off clinical trials who survive at least 5 years from initial anti-PD-1 treatment can be reassured of their excellent long-term prognosis, particularly if they did not require additional melanoma treatment during the first 5 years.     

Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio as a biomarker for clinical outcomes in advanced stage melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) and eosinophil counts are associated with improved survival in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, but no study has investigated neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratios (NER) as a predictive indicator in this population. In this retrospective study evaluating anti-PD-1 treated patients with advanced melanoma, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORR), and risk of high-grade (grade ≥3) immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared between groups defined by median pretreatment NLR and NER as well as median NLR and NER at 1-month post-treatment. Lower baseline NLR and NER were associated with improved OS [HR: 0.504, 95% CI: 0.328–0.773, p = .002 and HR: 0.442, 95% CI: 0.288–0.681, p < .001, respectively] on univariate testing. After accounting for multiple covariates, our multivariate analysis found that lower pretreatment NER was associated with better ORR (by irRECIST) (OR: 2.199, 95% CI: 1.071–4.582, p = .033) and improved OS (HR: 0.480, 95% CI: 0.296–0.777, p = .003). Baseline NLR, 1-month NLR, and 1-month NER were not associated with ORR, PFS, or OS outcomes; but 1-month NER correlated with lower risk of grade ≥3 irAEs (OR: 0.392, 95% CI: 0.165–0.895, p = .029). Our findings suggest baseline NER merits additional investigation as a novel prognostic marker for advanced melanoma patients receiving anti-PD-1-based regimens.     

The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value predicts the survival of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line ALK inhibitor

BackgroundAnaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved the clinical outcomes of patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, reliable biomarkers to predict the prognostic role of this treatment are lacking. The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) has recently been demonstrated as a novel comprehensive biomarker to predict survival of patients with solid tumors. Our study aimed to evaluate the prognostic power of PIV in this group of patients.Patients and methods94 patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who received first-line ALK inhibitors were enrolled in this study. PIV was calculated as the product of peripheral blood neutrophil, monocyte, and platelet counts divided by lymphocyte count. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox hazard regression models were used for survival analyses.ResultsThe 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 63.5%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 55.1%. Patients with higher PIV, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) had worse PFS in univariate analysis, but only the PIV (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79–4.70, p < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. Similarly, patients with higher PIV, NLR, PLR, and SII had a worse OS in the univariate analysis, but only the PIV (HR = 4.70, 95% CI: 2.00–11.02, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis.ConclusionPIV is a comprehensive and convenient predictor of both PFS and OS in patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who received first-line ALK TKIs. Prospective clinical trials are required to validate the value of this new parameter.     

The Role of a Single Angiogenesis Inhibitor in the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background

Currently, the standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. However, disease recurs in almost all patients, and the optimal salvage treatment for recurrent GBM remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials to assess the efficacy and toxicities of angiogenesis inhibitors alone as salvage treatment in these patients.

Methods

Trials published between 1994 and 2015 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library). Demographic data, treatment regimens, objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), 6-months PFS rate, 1-year OS and grade 3/4 toxicities were extracted. We also compared the main outcomes of interest between bevacizumab and other angiogenesis inhibitors. All analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis software (Version 2.0).

Results

A total of 842 patients were included for analysis: 343 patients were treated with bevacizumab, 386 with other angiogenesis inhibitors and 81 with thalidomide. The pooled ORR, 6-months PFS, and 1-year OS for recurrent GBM patients receiving angiogenesis inhibitors was 20.1%, 19.5% and 29.3%, respectively. The use of single agent bevacizumab in recurrent GBM significantly improved ORR and 6-months PFS when compared to other angiogenesis inhibitors [relative risk (RR) 2.93, 95% CI 1.38–6.21; p = 0.025; and RR 2.36 95% CI 1.46–3.82; p<0.001, respectively], while no significant difference in 1-year OS was found between the two groups (p = 0.07). when compared to thalidomide, bevacizumab treatment in recurrent GBM significantly improved ORR (RR 6.8, 95%CI: 2.64–17.6, p<0.001), but not for 6-months PFS (p = 0.07) and 1-year OS (p = 0.31). As for grade 3/4 toxicities, the common toxicity was hypertension with pooled incidence of 12.1%, while high-grade thromboembolic events (2.2%), hemorrhage (5.1%) and GI perforation (2.8%) associated with angiogenesis inhibitors were relatively low.

Conclusions

In comparison with other angiogenesis inhibitors and thalidomide, the use of single agent bevacizumab as salvage treatment for recurrent GBM patients improve ORR and 6-months PFS, but not for 1-year OS.     

Baseline blood volume identified by dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography as a new independent prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundPreliminary data showed prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) identified Blood Volume (BV) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). BV as an independent prognostic factor remains to be assessed.Materials and MethodsDCE-CT identified BV was prospectively quantified in patients with mRCC receiving first line therapies, adjusted for International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) individual features and treatments, and associated with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response (ORR), using Cox and logistic regression, respectively.Results105 patients with mRCC were included. Median baseline BV was 32.87 mL × 100 g⁻¹ (range 9.52 to 92.87 mL × 100 g⁻¹). BV above median was associated with IMDC favorable risk category (P = 0.004), metastasis free interval ≥ 1 year (P = 0.007), male gender (P = 0.032), normal hemoglobin (P = 0.040) and normal neutrophils (P = 0.007), whereas low BV was associated with poor risk IMDC features (P < 0.05). Patients with high vs. low baseline BV had longer PFS (12.5 vs. 5.6 months, P = 0.015) and longer OS (42.2 vs. 22.4 months, P = 0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis high baseline BV remained independent favorable for OS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30–0.78, P = 0.003) and PFS (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.42–0.97, P = 0.036). BV as a continuous variable was also associated with OS in the multivariate analysis (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96–1.00, P = 0.017). The estimated concordance index (c-index) was 0.688 using IMDC score and 0.701 when BV was added.ConclusionsDCE-CT identified Blood Volume is a new, independent prognostic factor in mRCC, which may improve the prognostic accuracy of IMDC.     

Prevalence of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis in elderly patients diagnosed with heart failure

ObjectiveThere is increased interest in studying ATTR-CA, a pathology that primarily affects patients of geriatric age and is frequently underdiagnosed. We aim to establish the prevalence of ATTR-CA in a cohort of patients with a history of HFpEF and to describe its characteristics.MethodsWe conducted a prospective observational study. Patients ≥75 years, clinical history of HFpEF, atrial dilation ≥34 ml/m² and left ventricular wall thickening >13 mm, were included. Demographic and analytical parameters were collected, and a comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed, along with a transthoracic echocardiogram and cardiac scintigraphy. Finally, telephone follow-up was carried out at 6 and 12 months.Results50 patients were recruited, mean age 86 ± 6 years, 54% women. Age and functional class (I–II vs. III–IV) were factors associated with presenting with ATTR-CA. Patients with positive scintigraphy had a median time to admission of 5.2 months (confidence interval [CI] 95% 0–10.9), while in those with negative scintigraphy, it was 12.2 months (95% CI 11.7–12.8); log-rank: p = 0.064. Patients with positive scintigraphy had a median time to the combined endpoint (death and readmission) of 1.9 months (95% CI 0–6.1), and patients with negative scintigraphy of 11.9 months (95% CI 11.7–12); log-rank: p = 0.027.ConclusionsATTR-CA appears to be a prevalent etiology in elderly patients within the spectrum of HFpEF. Patients with a diagnosis of ATTR-CA had a shorter time to admission for HF and the combined event of death and admission than patients with a negative result on scintigraphy.     

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases: Clinical outcomes and literature review

Background and aimThe role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of liver metastasis is increasing, using ablative doses with the goal of local control and ultimately improving survival. The aim of this study is to evaluate our initial results regarding local control, overall survival and toxicity in patients with liver metastases treated with this technique, due to the lack of evidence reported in Latin America.Materials/methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review from November 2012 to June 2018 of 24 patients with 32 liver metastases. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed for local control and overall survival. Clinical and prognostic factors were further analyzed by independent analysis. Median follow-up period was 22 months (range, 1–65 months).ResultsMedian age was 62 years (range, 40–84 years). Colorectal carcinoma was the most common primary cancer. Overall 1-year and 2-years local control rates were 82% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 70–98%) and 76.2% (95% CI, 45–90%), respectively. Median overall survival rate was 35 months (95%, CI 20.5–48 months). Overall 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 85.83% (95% CI, 64–99%) and 68% (95% CI, 45–84%), respectively. No acute or late grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed during the follow-up period.ConclusionsSBRT achieves excellent local control and overall survival rates with low toxicity in patients with liver metastases. Based on our literature review, our results are consistent with larger reports. Further randomized trials are required to compare with other local therapies.     

Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy Plus EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC Patients with Brain Metastases: A Meta-Analysis of Published Data

Background: The role of radiotherapy (RT) combined with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of RT plus EGFR-TKIs in those patients. Materials and Methods: Relevant literatures published between 2012 and 2017 were searched. Objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), intracranial progression-free survival (I-PFS) and adverse events (AEs) were extracted. The combined hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) were calculated using random effects models. Results: Twenty-four studies (2810 patients) were included in the analysis. Overall, RT plus EGFR-TKIs had higher ORR (RR?=?1.32, 95%CI: 1.13–1.55), DCR (RR?=?1.12, 95%CI: 1.04–1.22), and longer OS (HR?=?0.72, 95%CI: 0.59–0.89), I-PFS (HR?=?0.64, 95%CI: 0.50–0.82) than monotherapy, although with higher overall AEs (20.2% vs 11.8%, RR?=?1.34, 95% CI: 1.11–1.62). Furthermore, subgroup analyses found concurrent RT plus EGFR-TKIs could prolong OS (HR?=?0.69, 95%CI: 0.55–0.86) and I-PFS (HR?=?0.57, 95%CI: 0.44–0.75). Asian ethnicity and lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) patients predicted a more favorable prognosis (HR?=?0.69,95%CI: 0.54–0.88, HR?=?0.66, 95%CI: 0.53–0.83, respectively). Conclusion: RT plus EGFR-TKIs had higher response rate, longer OS and I-PFS than monotherapy in NSCLC patients with BM. Asian LAC patients with EGFR mutation had a better prognosis with concurrent treatment. The AEs of RT plus EGFR-TKIs were tolerated.     

Colder-to-warmer changes in children's blood lead concentrations are related to previous blood lead status: Results from a systematic review of prospective studies

ObjectiveTo estimate the extent of changes in mean BLLs from colder to warmer months, in children aged 1–5 years with different status of lead in colder months.MethodologyWe performed a systematic review using an in-house algorithm developed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINHAL. Search was performed between November 2012 and July 2013, and data evaluation and extraction were subsequently conducted. The mean BLLs observed in the warmer months was divided by the one observed in the colder months to obtain the warmer-to-colder ratio (WCR). Study-specific WCRs were pooled using the fixed-effects method of Mantel–Haenszel to estimate the combined WCR.ResultsFrom 4040 papers initially identified, eight cohort studies were considered relevant for inclusion. The combined WCR was inversely related to the BLLs observed during colder months. The values were 1.25 (95% CI: 0.90–1.60), 1.06 (95% CI: 0.92–1.19), and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.51–1.39) for children showing baseline BLLs of <10 μg dL⁻¹, 10–20 μg dL⁻¹and ≥20 μg dL⁻¹, respectively. The combined WCR was influenced neither by children's age nor place/date of study.ConclusionThe extent of the summer increase in BLLs depends on the BLLs in the colder months.     

Osimertinib Improves overall survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with leptomeningeal metastases

ObjectiveOsimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible, small-molecule epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that can effectively penetrate the blood brain-barrier (BBB). This study mainly explored the factors affecting the prognosis of EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM), and whether osimertinib could improve the survival benefit in these patients compared with those not treated with osimertinib.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who had been admitted with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and cytologically confirmed LM to the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2013 and December 2019. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the primary outcome of interest.ResultsA total of 71 patients with LM were included in this analysis, with a median OS (mOS) of 10.7 months (95% CI [7.6, 13.8]). Among them, 39 patients were treated with osimertinib after LM while 32 patients were untreated. Patients treated with osimertinib had a mOS of 11.3 months (95%CI [0, 23.9]) compared with the untreated patients who had a mOS of 8.1 months (95%CI [2.9, 13.3]), with a significant difference between the groups (hazard ratio [HR]): 0.43, 95%CI:0.22–0.66, p = 0.0009). Multivariate analysis revealed the use of osimertinib were correlated with superior OS with a HR of 0.43 (95%CI [0.25, 0.75]), with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.003).ConclusionsOsimertinib can prolong the overall survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with LM and improve patient outcomes.