Mammalian aPKC/Par polarity complex mediated regulation of epithelial division orientation and cell fate

Oriented cell division is a key regulator of tissue architecture and crucial for morphogenesis and homeostasis. Balanced regulation of proliferation and differentiation is an essential property of tissues not only to drive morphogenesis but also to maintain and restore homeostasis. In many tissues orientation of cell division is coupled to the regulation of differentiation producing daughters with similar (symmetric cell division, SCD) or differential fate (asymmetric cell division, ACD). This allows the organism to generate cell lineage diversity from a small pool of stem and progenitor cells. Division orientation and/or the ratio of ACD/SCD need to be tightly controlled. Loss of orientation or an altered ratio can promote overgrowth, alter tissue architecture and induce aberrant differentiation, and have been linked to morphogenetic diseases, cancer and aging. A key requirement for oriented division is the presence of a polarity axis, which can be established through cell intrinsic and/or extrinsic signals. Polarity proteins translate such internal and external cues to drive polarization. In this review we will focus on the role of the polarity complex aPKC/Par3/Par6 in the regulation of division orientation and cell fate in different mammalian epithelia. We will compare the conserved function of this complex in mitotic spindle orientation and distribution of cell fate determinants and highlight common and differential mechanisms in which this complex is used by tissues to adapt division orientation and cell fate to the specific properties of the epithelium.     

Cadherin Adhesion Receptors Orient the Mitotic Spindle during Symmetric Cell Division in Mammalian Epithelia

Oriented cell division is a fundamental determinant of tissue organization. Simple epithelia divide symmetrically in the plane of the monolayer to preserve organ structure during epithelial morphogenesis and tissue turnover. For this to occur, mitotic spindles must be stringently oriented in the Z-axis, thereby establishing the perpendicular division plane between daughter cells. Spatial cues are thought to play important roles in spindle orientation, notably during asymmetric cell division. The molecular nature of the cortical cues that guide the spindle during symmetric cell division, however, is poorly understood. Here we show directly for the first time that cadherin adhesion receptors are required for planar spindle orientation in mammalian epithelia. Importantly, spindle orientation was disrupted without affecting tissue cohesion or epithelial polarity. This suggests that cadherin receptors can serve as cues for spindle orientation during symmetric cell division. We further show that disrupting cadherin function perturbed the cortical localization of APC, a microtubule-interacting protein that was required for planar spindle orientation. Together, these findings establish a novel morphogenetic function for cadherin adhesion receptors to guide spindle orientation during symmetric cell division.     

Cell shape and Wnt signaling redundantly control the division axis of C. elegans epithelial stem cells

Tissue-specific stem cells combine proliferative and asymmetric divisions to balance self-renewal with differentiation. Tight regulation of the orientation and plane of cell division is crucial in this process. Here, we study the reproducible pattern of anterior-posterior-oriented stem cell-like divisions in the Caenorhabditis elegans seam epithelium. In a genetic screen, we identified an alg-1 Argonaute mutant with additional and abnormally oriented seam cell divisions. ALG-1 is the main subunit of the microRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC) and was previously shown to regulate the timing of postembryonic development. Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy of developing larvae revealed that reduced alg-1 function successively interferes with Wnt signaling, cell adhesion, cell shape and the orientation and timing of seam cell division. We found that Wnt inactivation, through mig-14 Wntless mutation, disrupts tissue polarity but not anterior-posterior division. However, combined Wnt inhibition and cell shape alteration resulted in disordered orientation of seam cell division, similar to the alg-1 mutant. Our findings reveal additional alg-1-regulated processes, uncover a previously unknown function of Wnt ligands in seam tissue polarity, and show that Wnt signaling and geometric cues redundantly control the seam cell division axis.     

Cellular responses to extracellular guidance cues

Extracellular guidance cues have a key role in orchestrating cell behaviour. They can take many forms, including soluble and cell‐bound ligands (proteins, lipids, peptides or small molecules) and insoluble matrix substrates, but to act as guidance cues, they must be presented to the cell in a spatially restricted manner. Cells that recognize such cues respond by activating intracellular signal transduction pathways in a spatially restricted manner and convert the extracellular information into intracellular polarity. Although extracellular cues influence a broad range of cell polarity decisions, such as mitotic spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division, or the establishment of apical–basal polarity in epithelia, this review will focus specifically on guidance cues that promote cell migration (chemotaxis), or localized cell shape changes (chemotropism).     

The Rap1-Rgl-Ral signaling network regulates neuroblast cortical polarity and spindle orientation

A crucial first step in asymmetric cell division is to establish an axis of cell polarity along which the mitotic spindle aligns. Drosophila melanogaster neural stem cells, called neuroblasts (NBs), divide asymmetrically through intrinsic polarity cues, which regulate spindle orientation and cortical polarity. In this paper, we show that the Ras-like small guanosine triphosphatase Rap1 signals through the Ral guanine nucleotide exchange factor Rgl and the PDZ protein Canoe (Cno; AF-6/Afadin in vertebrates) to modulate the NB division axis and its apicobasal cortical polarity. Rap1 is slightly enriched at the apical pole of metaphase/anaphase NBs and was found in a complex with atypical protein kinase C and Par6 in vivo. Loss of function and gain of function of Rap1, Rgl, and Ral proteins disrupt the mitotic axis orientation, the localization of Cno and Mushroom body defect, and the localization of cell fate determinants. We propose that the Rap1-Rgl-Ral signaling network is a novel mechanism that cooperates with other intrinsic polarity cues to modulate asymmetric NB division.     

细胞不对称分裂

细胞不对称分裂是多细胞生物发育的基础。细胞不对称分裂的重要特征是细胞命运决定子在细胞分裂期间的不对称分离。细胞不对称分裂一般要经历4个步骤：在细胞中建立一个极性轴;沿此轴定向并形成纺锤体;细胞命运决定子沿极性轴作极性分布;细胞分裂后,不同的细胞命运决定子指导决定细胞的不同命运。     

Where does asymmetry come from? Illustrating principles of polarity and asymmetry establishment in Drosophila neuroblasts

Asymmetric cell division (ACD) is the fundamental process through which one cell divides into two cells with different fates. In animals, it is crucial for the generation of cell-type diversity and for stem cells, which use ACD both to self-renew and produce one differentiating daughter cell. One of the most prominent model systems of ACD, Drosophila neuroblasts, relies on the PAR complex, a conserved set of proteins governing cell polarity in animals. Here, we focus on recent advances in our understanding of the mechanisms that control the orientation of the neuroblast polarity axis, how the PAR complex is positioned, and how its activity may regulate division orientation and cell fate determinant localization and discuss how important findings about the composition polarity complexes in other models may apply to neuroblasts.     

干细胞不对称分裂模式与肿瘤发生

干细胞发育中存在对称/不对称两种方式的交替分裂,精确调控维持正常发育。相关调控因素有外源性机制和内源性机制,发现于基本模式生物果蝇,主要包括干细胞周围微环境、细胞极性、纺锤体轴向和命运决定子不对称分布。调控机制的失常将导致干细胞分裂模式紊乱,可能造成肿瘤发生。简要综述了相关研究进展。     

Zebrafish neural tube morphogenesis requires Scribble-dependent oriented cell divisions

How control of subcellular events in single cells determines morphogenesis on the scale of the tissue is largely unresolved. The stereotyped cross-midline mitoses of progenitors in the zebrafish neural keel provide a unique experimental paradigm for defining the role and control of single-cell orientation for tissue-level morphogenesis in vivo. We show here that the coordinated orientation of individual progenitor cell division in the neural keel is the cellular determinant required for morphogenesis into a neural tube epithelium with a single straight lumen. We find that Scribble is required for oriented cell division and that its function in this process is independent of canonical apicobasal and planar polarity pathways. We identify a role for Scribble in controlling clustering of α-catenin foci in dividing progenitors. Loss of either Scrib or N-cadherin results in abnormally oriented mitoses, reduced cross-midline cell divisions, and similar neural tube defects. We propose that Scribble-dependent nascent cell-cell adhesion clusters between neuroepithelial progenitors contribute to define orientation of their cell division. Finally, our data demonstrate that while oriented mitoses of individual cells determine neural tube architecture, the tissue can in turn feed back on its constituent cells to define their polarization and cell division orientation to ensure robust tissue morphogenesis.     

Mind the gap: Cells respond to tissue damage by changing orientation of cell divisions

Nature presents plenty of examples of cellular behavior that determines the shape of an organ during development, such as epithelial polarity and cell division orientation. Little is known, however, about how organs regenerate or how cellular behavior affects regeneration. One of the most exciting aspects of regeneration biology is understanding how proliferation and patterning are coordinated, since it means that cells not only have to proliferate but also have to do so in an ordered manner so that organs are reconstructed proportionally. Drosophila wing imaginal discs and adult wings are models used in different approaches to investigate this issue; they have recently been used to reveal that, after localized cell death, neighboring cells change their cell division orientation toward the damaged zone. During this process, cell polarity and spindle orientation operate in coordination with cell proliferation to regenerate proper organ size and shape.     

Control of spindle polarity and orientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Control of mitotic spindle orientation represents a major strategy for the generation of cell diversity during development of metazoans. Studies in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have contributed towards our present understanding of the general principles underlying the regulation of spindle positioning in an asymmetrically dividing cell. In S. cerevisiae, the mitotic spindle must orient along the cell polarity axis, defined by the site of bud emergence, to ensure correct nuclear division between the mother and daughter cells. Establishment of spindle polarity dictates this process and relies on the concerted control of spindle pole function and a precise program of cues originating from the cell cortex that directs cytoplasmic microtubule attachments during spindle morphogenesis. These cues cross talk with the machinery responsible for bud-site selection, indicating that orientation of the spindle in yeast cells is mechanistically coupled to the definition of a polarity axis and the division plane. Here, we propose a model integrating the inherently asymmetric properties of the spindle pathway with the program of positional information contributing towards orienting the spindle in budding yeast. Because the basic machinery orienting the spindle in higher-eukaryotic cells appears to be conserved, it might be expected that similar principles govern centrosome asymmetry in the course of metazoan development.     

Mind the gap

Nature presents plenty of examples of cellular behavior that determines the shape of an organ during development, such as epithelial polarity and cell division orientation. Little is known, however, about how organs regenerate or how cellular behavior affects regeneration. One of the most exciting aspects of regeneration biology is understanding how proliferation and patterning are coordinated, since it means that cells not only have to proliferate but also have to do so in an ordered manner so that organs are reconstructed proportionally. Drosophila wing imaginal discs and adult wings are models used in different approaches to investigate this issue; they have recently been used to reveal that, after localized cell death, neighboring cells change their cell division orientation toward the damaged zone. During this process, cell polarity and spindle orientation operate in coordination with cell proliferation to regenerate proper organ size and shape.     

Cell division orientation in animals

Cell division orientation during animal development can serve to correctly organize and shape tissues, create cellular diversity or both. The underlying cellular mechanism is regulated spindle orientation. Depending on the developmental context, extrinsic signals or intrinsic cues control the correct orientation of the mitotic spindle. Cell geometry has been known to be another determinant of spindle orientation and recent results have shed new light?on the link between cellular shape and cell division orientation. The importance of controlling spindle orientation is manifested in neurodevelopmental defects such as?microcephaly, tumor initiation as well as defects in tissue architecture and cell fate misspecification. Here, we summarize the role of oriented cell division during animal development and also outline the cellular and molecular mechanisms in selected invertebrate and vertebrate systems.     

Oriented cell division in vertebrate embryogenesis

Tissue morphogenesis depends on the spatial arrangement of cells during development. A number of mechanisms have been described to contribute to the final shape of a tissue or organ, ranging from cell intercalation to the response of cells to chemotactic cues. One such mechanism is oriented cell division. Oriented cell division is determined by the position of the mitotic spindle. Indeed, there is increasing evidence implicating spindle misorientation in tissue and organ misshaping, which underlies disease conditions such as tumorigenesis or polycystic kidneys. Here we review recent studies addressing how the direction of tissue growth is determined by the orientation of cell division and how both extrinsic and intrinsic cues control the position of the mitotic spindle.     

Cell polarity, auxin transport, and cytoskeleton-mediated division planes: who comes first?

In plants, cell polarity is an issue more recurring than in other systems, because plants, due to their adaptive and flexible development, often change cell polarity postembryonically according to intrinsic cues and demands of the environment. Recent findings on the directional movement of the plant signalling molecule auxin provide a unique connection between individual cell polarity and the establishment of polarity at the tissue, organ, and whole-plant levels. Decisions about the subcellular polar targeting of PIN auxin transport components determine the direction of auxin flow between cells and consequently mediate multiple developmental events. In addition, mutations or chemical interference with PIN-based auxin transport result in abnormal cell divisions. Thus, the complicated links between cell polarity establishment, auxin transport, cytoskeleton, and oriented cell divisions now begin to emerge. Here we review the available literature on the issues of cell polarity in both plants and animals to extend our understanding on the generation, maintenance, and transmission of cell polarity in plants.     

ABL1 Joins the Cadre of Spindle Orientation Machinery

Directing the axis of cell division toward extrinsic and intrinsic cues plays a fundamental role in morphogenesis, asymmetric cell division, and stem cell self-renewal. Recent studies highlight the misorientation of the cell division axis as a cause of mammalian diseases, including polycystic kidney disease. Although the core regulators for oriented cell division have been identified in invertebrate model systems, we still have an imprecise picture of the relevant signaling networks in the mammalian system. The reasons for this include the lack of established approaches in mammalian cells to survey the molecules required for the spindle orientation. Here we summarize our recent study on a genome-scale RNA-mediated interference screen of human kinases to identify a new player for the oriented cell division in both culture cells and developing mammalian tissues.     

Differential proliferation rates generate patterns of mechanical tension that orient tissue growth

Orientation of cell divisions is a key mechanism of tissue morphogenesis. In the growing Drosophila wing imaginal disc epithelium, most of the cell divisions in the central wing pouch are oriented along the proximal–distal (P–D) axis by the Dachsous‐Fat‐Dachs planar polarity pathway. However, cells at the periphery of the wing pouch instead tend to orient their divisions perpendicular to the P–D axis despite strong Dachs polarization. Here, we show that these circumferential divisions are oriented by circumferential mechanical forces that influence cell shapes and thus orient the mitotic spindle. We propose that this circumferential pattern of force is not generated locally by polarized constriction of individual epithelial cells. Instead, these forces emerge as a global tension pattern that appears to originate from differential rates of cell proliferation within the wing pouch. Accordingly, we show that localized overgrowth is sufficient to induce neighbouring cell stretching and reorientation of cell division. Our results suggest that patterned rates of cell proliferation can influence tissue mechanics and thus determine the orientation of cell divisions and tissue shape.     

Drosophila aPKC is required for mitotic spindle orientation during symmetric division of epithelial cells

Epithelial cells mostly orient the spindle along the plane of the epithelium (planar orientation) for mitosis to produce two identical daughter cells. The correct orientation of the spindle relies on the interaction between cortical polarity components and astral microtubules. Recent studies in mammalian tissue culture cells suggest that the apically localised atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) is important for the planar orientation of the mitotic spindle in dividing epithelial cells. Yet, in chicken neuroepithelial cells, aPKC is not required in vivo for spindle orientation, and it has been proposed that the polarization cues vary between different epithelial cell types and/or developmental processes. In order to investigate whether Drosophila aPKC is required for spindle orientation during symmetric division of epithelial cells, we took advantage of a previously isolated temperature-sensitive allele of aPKC. We showed that Drosophila aPKC is required in vivo for spindle planar orientation and apical exclusion of Pins (Raps). This suggests that the cortical cues necessary for spindle orientation are not only conserved between Drosophila and mammalian cells, but are also similar to those required for spindle apicobasal orientation during asymmetric cell division.     

The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis

The cell division axis determines the future positions of daughter cells and is therefore critical for cell fate. The positioning of the division axis has been mostly studied in systems such as embryos or yeasts, in which cell shape is well defined. In these cases, cell shape anisotropy and cell polarity affect spindle orientation. It remains unclear whether cell geometry or cortical cues are determinants for spindle orientation in mammalian cultured cells. The cell environment is composed of an extracellular matrix (ECM), which is connected to the intracellular actin cytoskeleton via transmembrane proteins. We used micro-contact printing to control the spatial distribution of the ECM on the substrate and demonstrated that it has a role in determining the orientation of the division axis of HeLa cells. On the basis of our analysis of the average distributions of actin-binding proteins in interphase and mitosis, we propose that the ECM controls the location of actin dynamics at the membrane, and thus the segregation of cortical components in interphase. This segregation is further maintained on the cortex of mitotic cells and used for spindle orientation.     

Specification of polarity of teloblastogenesis in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex: cellular basis for bilateral symmetry in the ectoderm

Ectodermal teloblastogenesis in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex is a spatiotemporally regulated process that gives rise to four bilateral pairs of ectoteloblasts (N, O, P, and Q) that assume distinct fates. Ectoteloblasts on either side of the embryo arise from an invariable sequence of asymmetric cell divisions of a proteloblast, NOPQ, which occur with a defined orientation with respect to the embryonic axes: the N teloblast is generated first and located ventralmost, and the Q teloblast, which is generated next, is located dorsalmost; finally, the O and P teloblasts are generated by almost equal division of their precursor cell, OP. Polarity of teloblastogenesis on one side of the embryo is a mirror image of the other; this mirror symmetry of ectoteloblasts about the embryo's midline gives rise to the bilaterally symmetric organization of the ectoderm. In this study, we examined whether cellular interactions are involved in specification of polarity of asymmetric cell divisions in NOPQ cells. A set of cell transplantation experiments demonstrated that NOPQ cells are initially uncommitted in terms of division pattern and cell fates: If a left NOPQ cell is transplanted to the right side of a host embryo, it exhibits a polarity comparable to that of right NOPQ cells. The results of another set of cell transplantation experiments suggest that contact between NOPQ cells serves as an external cue for their polarization, irrespective of their position in the embryo, and that in the absence of host NOPQ cells, transplanted NOPQ cells can be polarized according to positional information residing in the host embryo. The competence of NOPQ cells to respond to external cues tapers down before their division into N and OPQ. A set of cell ablation experiments demonstrated that neighboring cells such as posteriorly located M teloblasts and anterolaterally located micromeres play a role in controlling spatial aspects of NOPQ's behavior that gives rise to their division along the dorsoventral axis. These results suggest that NOPQ cells, which do not initially have a rigidly fixed polarity, become polarized through external cues. Possible sources of signals for this polarizing induction are discussed in the light of the present results.