Coupling of proadipocyte growth arrest and differentiation. I. Induction by heparinized medium containing human plasma

The differentiation of proadipocytes in vitro typically required prolonged culture of cells as a high density in high concentrations of serum and added hormones. With such culture conditions it is difficult to design experiments to determine the mechanisms that control the differentiation process. We now describe the rapid and parasynchronous growth arrest and differentiation of low density murine proadipocytes in heparinized medium containing only human plasma. When low density cells are cultured under these conditions, growth arrest at a distinct state in the G1 phase of the cell cycle occurs within 2 d and the differentiation of 80-100% of the cell population occurs within 4 d thereafter. The factors in human plasma which promote growth arrest and differentiation are heat labile and can be separated by barium adsorption. In the following paper we have used these methods to show that there are five separate phases which regulate the coupling of proadipocyte growth arrest and differentiation. The data reported in this paper establish that: (a) high cell density and extensive cell-to- cell contact are not required for adipocyte differentiation, (b) prolonged culture is not required for adipocyte differentiation, and (c) high concentrations of serum and/or added hormones are not required for adipocyte differentiation.     

Coupling the cell cycle to cell growth

In order to multiply, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells go through a series of events that are collectively called the cell cycle. However, DNA replication, mitosis and cell division may also be viewed as having their own, in principle independent, cycles, which are tied together by mechanisms extrinsic to the cell cycle—the checkpoints—that maintain the order of events. We propose that our understanding of cell-cycle regulation is enhanced by viewing each event individually, as an independently regulated process. The nature of the parameters that regulate cell-cycle events is discussed and, in particular, we argue that cell mass is not such a parameter.     

Histone gene transcription: A model for responsiveness to an integrated series of regulatory signals mediating cell cycle control and proliferation/differentiation interrelationships

Histone gene expression is restricted to the S-phase of the cell cycle. Control is at multiple levels and is mediated by the integration of regulatory signals in response to cell cycle progression and the onset of differentiation. The H4 gene promoter is organized into a series of independent and overlapping regulatory elements which exhibit selective, phosphorylation-dependent interactions with multiple transactivation factors. The three-dimensional organization of the promoter and, in particular, its chromatin structure, nucleosome organization, and interactions with the nuclear matrix may contribute to interrelationships of activities at multiple promoter elements. Molecular mechanisms are discussed that may participate in the coordinate expression of S-phase-specific core and H1 histone genes, together with other genes functionally coupled with DNA replication.     

Cytokine triggered molecular pathways that control cell cycle arrest.

Recent progress has been made concerning the understanding of the molecular pathways that mediate the growth suppressive effects of inhibitory cytokines. Interferons, interleukin-6 and transforming growth factor-beta were investigated in these studies. Cell lines that display growth sensitivity to all three cytokines and growth resistant derivates provided a suitable genetic background to determine whether common or unique post-receptor elements mediate the effects of each cytokine. Three nuclear genes, c-myc, RB, and cyclin A were found to be common key downstream targets along the cytokine induced growth suppressive pathways. Genetic and pharmacological manipulations proved that these molecular responses fall into few complementary pathways that function in parallel to achieve the cytokine mediated G0/G1 arrest. New strategies, such as knock out anti-sense gene cloning were developed and they currently provide powerful tools for the isolation of genes along the signaling pathways of growth arrest.     

N-cadherin activation substitutes for the cell contact control in cell cycle arrest and myogenic differentiation: involvement of p120 and beta-catenin

N-cadherin is expressed throughout skeletal myogenesis and has been proposed to be involved in the differentiation program of myogenic precursors. Here, we further characterize the N-cadherin involvement and its mechanism of action at the onset of differentiation, through controlled N-cadherin activation by plating isolated C2 myoblasts on surfaces coated with a chimeric Ncad-Fc homophilic ligand (N-cadherin ectodomain fused to the immunoglobulin G Fc fragment). We show that N-cadherin activation substitutes for the cell density in myogenic differentiation by promoting myogenin and troponin T expression. In addition, N-cadherin adhesion participates to the associated cell cycle arrest through the nuclear accumulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p27. Mouse primary myoblast cultures exhibited similar responses to N-cadherin as C2 cells. RNA interference knockdowns of the N-cadherin-associated cytoplasmic proteins p120 and beta-catenin produced opposite effects on the differentiation pathway. p120 silencing resulted in a decreased myogenic differentiation, associated with a reduction in cadherin-catenin content, which may explain its action on myogenic differentiation. beta-Catenin silencing led to a stimulatory effect on myogenin expression, without any effect on cell cycle. Our results demonstrate that N-cadherin adhesion may account for cell-cell contact-dependent cell cycle arrest and differentiation of myogenic cells, involving regulation through p120 and beta-catenins.     

From growth to cell cycle control.

How does a quiescent cell decide to re-enter the cell cycle and start replicating its DNA? What controls cell proliferation? These are fundamental questions that have to be solved in order to understand the mechanisms of oncogenesis. Some recent data have provided clues about how signal transduction pathways may be connected to the cell cycle. A protein kinase cascade starting from the membrane growth factor receptor is thought to be involved in transducing extracellular stimuli to the master switches of the cell cycle control machinery. The recently identified extracellular-signal regulated kinases (ERKs) appear to play an important role in this pathway. Expression of cyclins, which are regulatory subunits of the universal cell cycle oscillator cdc2, may also be controlled through this kinase cascade. The products of tumor suppressor genes Rb and p53 also play an important role in regulating cell proliferation by interfering with the cell cycle pathway. Here, I will review and discuss the importance of these different new results.     

A model for restriction point control of the mammalian cell cycle

Inhibition of protein synthesis by cycloheximide blocks subsequent division of a mammalian cell, but only if the cell is exposed to the drug before the "restriction point" (i.e. within the first several hours after birth). If exposed to cycloheximide after the restriction point, a cell proceeds with DNA synthesis, mitosis and cell division and halts in the next cell cycle. If cycloheximide is later removed from the culture medium, treated cells will return to the division cycle, showing a complex pattern of division times post-treatment, as first measured by Zetterberg and colleagues. We simulate these physiological responses of mammalian cells to transient inhibition of growth, using a set of nonlinear differential equations based on a realistic model of the molecular events underlying progression through the cell cycle. The model relies on our earlier work on the regulation of cyclin-dependent protein kinases during the cell division cycle of yeast. The yeast model is supplemented with equations describing the effects of retinoblastoma protein on cell growth and the synthesis of cyclins A and E, and with a primitive representation of the signaling pathway that controls synthesis of cyclin D.     

Mediation of nerve growth factor-driven cell cycle arrest in PC12 cells by p53. Simultaneous differentiation and proliferation subsequent to p53 functional inactivation

Upon stimulation with nerve growth factor (NGF), PC12 cells extend neurites and cease to proliferate by influencing cell cycle proteins. Previous studies have shown that neuritogenesis and a block at the G(1)/S checkpoint correlate with the nuclear translocation of and an increase in the p53 tumor suppressor protein. This study was designed to determine if p53 plays a direct role in mediating NGF-driven G(1) arrest. A retroviral vector that overexpresses a temperature-sensitive p53 mutant protein (p53ts) was used to extinguish the function of endogenous p53 in PC12 cells in a dominant-negative manner at the nonpermissive temperature. NGF treatment led to transactivation of a p53 response element in a luciferase reporter construct in PC12 cells, whereas this response to NGF was absent in PC12(p53ts) cells at the nonpermissive temperature. With p53 functionally inactivated, NGF failed to activate growth arrest, as measured by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation, and also failed to induce p21/WAF1 expression, as measured by Western blotting. Since neurite outgrowth proceeded unharmed, 50% of the cells simultaneously demonstrated neurite morphology and were in S phase. Both PC12 cells expressing SV40 T antigen and PC12 cells treated with p53 antisense oligonucleotides continued through the cell cycle, confirming the dependence of the NGF growth arrest signal on a p53 pathway. Activation of Ras in a dexamethasone-inducible PC12 cell line (GSRas1) also caused p53 nuclear translocation and growth arrest. Therefore, wild-type p53 is indispensable in mediating the NGF antiproliferative signal through the Ras/MAPK pathway that regulates the cell cycle of PC12 cells.     

Density-dependent tumor cell death and reversible cell cycle arrest: mutually exclusive modes of monocyte-mediated growth control

The population development of five human tumor cell lines is examined under the influence of elutriator-prepared human monocytes in a serum-free hormone- and growth factor-supplemented medium. Analysis was performed by electronic counting and sizing of tumor cell nuclei and flow cytometric detection of cell cycle phases. Tumor cell death is triggered at rather low monocyte:tumor cell ratios (1:2 to 1:4) whereas it is strongly reduced at high monocyte densities. Furthermore, it is shown that confluence of the target cell population is a necessary prerequisite for lysis. The data suggest that in monocyte/tumor cell cocultures the decision on target cell lysis is not made by the effector cell, but rather by the target cell and that the criterion for this decision is the target cell's ability or inability to respond to a monocyte challenge by arresting the cell cycle in G1. Interactions between target cells play an important role in determining the result of this decision process. A common basis is suggested for this kind of density-dependent monocyte-triggered lysis and density-dependent cell death in 3T3 cell cultures as described previously.     

The nature of the cell cycle and the control of cell proliferation

It is generally accepted that cells contain numerous negative feedback control systems which are frequently invoked for their ability to maintain homeostasis. There is no reason to believe that the replicating cell is an exception yet paradoxically it is a highly dynamic entity in that the levels of constituents vary with time. The inconsistency between theory and observation is easily resolvable if (a) the events of the cell cycle reflect the oscillatory behaviour of certain of the regulatory processes, and, (b) proliferation control is exerted via transitions between periodic and aperiodic (or damped periodic) states as the result of changes in the values of the parameters determining the behaviour of the system. This concept is briefly discussed in relation to: the wide variety of agents that can affect replication; the existence of distinct non-proliferative states; the continuous control of proliferation rate; variations in the sensitivity toward cell cycle inhibitory agents; senescence; the ‘loss’ of control of cell division in cancer.     

A MAPK-positive feedback mechanism for BLR1 signaling propels retinoic acid-triggered differentiation and cell cycle arrest

MAPK signaling is required for retinoic acid (RA)-triggered G(0) cell cycle arrest and cell differentiation, but the mechanism is not well defined. In this study, RA is found to cause MAPK activation with sustained association of RAF to MEK or ERK, leading to a MAPK-dependent accumulation of p21(Waf1/Cip1) and binding to CDK2 blocking G(1)/S transition. BLR1, a chemokine receptor, was found to function as a critical component of RA-triggered MAPK signaling. Unlike wild-type parental cells, RA-treated BLR1 knock-out cells failed to show RAF and consequential MEK and ERK phosphorylation, failed to accumulate CDK inhibitors that control G(1)/S transition, and failed to differentiate and arrest in response to RA, whereas ectopically overexpressing BLR1 enhanced MAPK signaling and caused accelerated RA-induced differentiation and arrest. Ectopic overexpression of RAF enhanced BLR1 expression in response to RA, whereas inhibition of RAF or MEK by inhibitors or knockdown of RAF by short interfering RNA diminished RA-induced BLR1 expression and attenuated differentiation and growth arrest. Ectopic expression of the RAF CR3, the catalytically active domain, in the BLR1 knock-out restored RA-induced MAPK activation and the ability to differentiate and arrest, indicating that RAF effects MAPK signaling by BLR1 to propel differentiation/arrest. Taken together, RA induces cell differentiation and growth arrest through activation of a novel MAPK pathway with BLR1 as a critical component in a positive feedback mechanism that may contribute to the prolonged MAPK signaling propelling RA-induced cell cycle arrest and differentiation.     

Relationship of the cell cycle to xylem cell differentiation: A new model

Abstract. Conflicting data have appeared in the literature concerning the necessity for DNA synthesis prior to xylem cell differentiation. In some systems DNA synthesis is not required before differentiation, while in other systems DNA synthesis appears to be an absolute necessity. The construction of a model for the cell cycle in which the G1 phase is subdivided into a separate 'early' and 'late' phase can resolve this apparent conflict.     

Nerve growth factor induces cell cycle arrest of astrocytes

Neurotrophins can influence multiple cellular functions depending on the cellular context and the specific receptors they interact with. These neurotrophic factors have been extensively studied for their ability to support neuronal survival via Trk receptors and to induce apoptosis via the p75(NTR). However, the p75(NTR) is also detected on cell populations that do not undergo apoptosis in response to neurotrophins. In particular, the authors have detected p75(NTR) expression on astrocytes during development and after seizure-induced injury. In this study, the authors investigated the role of Nerve growth factor (NGF) in regulating astrocyte proliferation and in influencing specific aspects of the cell cycle. The authors have demonstrated that NGF prevents the induction of cyclins and their association with specific cyclin-dependent kinases, and thereby prevents progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Since the authors have previously shown that p75(NTR) but not TrkA, is expressed in astrocytes, these data suggest that activation of p75(NTR) promotes withdrawal of astrocytes from the cell cycle, which may have important consequences during development and after injury.     

Coupling cell growth,proliferation, and death. Hippo weighs in

Four recent papers describe the characterization in Drosophila of Hippo, a serine/threonine kinase of the Sterile 20 (STE20) group, resembling Mst1 and Mst2. Hippo restricts cell growth and cell proliferation, promotes cell death, and interacts with the tumor suppressors Salvador and Warts. This, together with the ability of Mst2 to rescue hippo mutant phenotypes, argues that Mst/Hippo proteins are tumor suppressors.     

H1 subtype expression during cell proliferation and growth arrest

H1 histone subtype genes differ in their expression patterns during the different stages of the cell cycle interphase. While the group of replication-dependent H1 histone subtypes is synthesized during S phase, the replacement histone subtype H1.0 is also expressed replication-independently in non-proliferating cells. The present study is the first report about the analysis of the cell cycle-dependent expression of all five replication-dependent H1 subtypes, the replacement histone H1.0 and the ubiquitously expressed subtype H1x. The expression of these H1 histone subtypes in HeLa cells was analysed on mRNA level by quantitative real-time RT-PCR as well as on protein level by immunoblotting. We found that after arrest of HeLa cells in G1 phase by treatment with sodium butyrate, the mRNA levels of all replication-dependently expressed H1 subtypes decreased, but to very different extent. During S phase the individual replication-dependently expressed H1 subtypes show similar kinetics regarding their mRNA levels. However, the variations in their protein amounts partially differ from the respective RNA levels which especially applies to histone H1.3. In contrast, the mRNA as well as the protein level of H1x remained nearly unchanged in G1 as well as during S phase progression. The results of the present study demonstrate that the cell cycle-dependent mRNA and protein expression of various H1 subtypes is differentially regulated, supporting the hypothesis of a functional heterogeneity.     

Cell cycle arrest and cellular differentiation mediated by a cell surface sialoglycopeptide

Cell cycling by a relatively wide variety of cell lines was shown to be reversibly inhibited by a cell surface sialoglycopeptide (SGP) isolated and purified from intact bovine cerebral cortex cells. Cell cycle arrest, mediated by the bovine SGP inhibitor, was shown to be completely reversible with mouse Swiss 3T3, mouse 1316 fibrosarcoma, mouse N2a neuroblastoma, bovine MDBK and monkey BSC-1 cells. These cell lines represented both fibroblast and epithelial-like cells, transformed and nontransformed cells, as well as their being derived from a broad array of species. In contrast to the others tested, human HL-60 leukemic cells were sensitive to the inhibitory effects of the SGP but did not reenter the mitotic cycle after the removal of the inhibitor. Instead, the mitotic arrest of HL-60 cells appeared to enhance entry into a terminal and irreversible state of cellular differentiation.