基于核小体位置预测的酵母进化印迹研究

在利用核小体定位实验数据训练支持向量机(SVM)对任意酵母DNA序列的核小体形成能力进行预测的过程中,发现染色质结构对基因组DNA分子进化过程有着显著影响。我们观察到核小体DNA比连接DNA的平均预测准确率低15%,这种普遍存在的局部预测准确率差异性代表了酵母核小体定位的进化印迹(Evolutionary footprint),它揭示了核小体组织在基因组的整个进化过程中所具有的保守性。     

Regulation of nucleosome stability as a mediator of chromatin function

Interactions among regulatory proteins, enzymes and DNA are required to use the information encoded in genomes. In eukaryotes, the location and timing of interactions between these proteins and DNA is determined in large part by whether DNA at a given locus is packaged into a nucleosome. Given the central role of nucleosome formation in regulating genome function, many mechanisms have evolved to control nucleosome stability at loci across the genome. New conclusions about the role of the DNA sequence itself in the regulation of nucleosome stability have come from two new types of experiment: high-resolution mapping of in vivo nucleosome occupancy on a genomic scale; and in vivo versus in vitro comparisons of nucleosome stability on natural DNA templates. These new types of data raise intriguing questions about the evolutionary constraints on DNA sequence with regard to nucleosome formation, and at long last might enable the derivation of DNA sequence-based rules that produce reliable predictions of nucleosome behavior.     

Are nucleosome positions in vivo primarily determined by histone–DNA sequence preferences?

Large-scale and genome-wide studies have concluded that ∼80% of the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) genome is occupied by positioned nucleosomes. In vivo this nucleosome organization can result from a variety of mechanisms, including the intrinsic DNA sequence preferences for wrapping the DNA around the histone core. Recently, a genome-wide study was reported using massively parallel sequencing to directly compare in vivo and in vitro nucleosome positions. It was concluded that intrinsic DNA sequence preferences indeed have a dominant role in determining the in vivo nucleosome organization of the genome, consistent with a genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Some other studies disagree with this view. Using the large amount of data now available from several sources, we have attempted to clarify a fundamental question concerning the packaging of genomic DNA: to what extent are nucleosome positions in vivo determined by histone-DNA sequence preferences? We have analyzed data obtained from different laboratories in the same way, and have directly compared these data. We also identify possible problems with some of the experimental designs used and with the data analysis. Our findings suggest that DNA sequence preferences have only small effects on the positioning of individual nucleosomes throughout the genome in vivo.     

High‐resolution analysis of DNA synthesis start sites and nucleosome architecture at efficient mammalian replication origins

DNA replication origins are poorly characterized genomic regions that are essential to recruit and position the initiation complex to start DNA synthesis. Despite the lack of specific replicator sequences, initiation of replication does not occur at random sites in the mammalian genome. This has lead to the view that DNA accessibility could be a major determinant of mammalian origins. Here, we performed a high‐resolution analysis of nucleosome architecture and initiation sites along several origins of different genomic location and firing efficiencies. We found that mammalian origins are highly variable in nucleosome conformation and initiation patterns. Strikingly, initiation sites at efficient CpG island‐associated origins always occur at positions of high‐nucleosome occupancy. Origin recognition complex (ORC) binding sites, however, occur at adjacent but distinct positions marked by labile nucleosomes. We also found that initiation profiles mirror nucleosome architecture, both at endogenous origins and at a transgene in a heterologous system. Our studies provide a unique insight into the relationship between chromatin structure and initiation sites in the mammalian genome that has direct implications for how the replication programme can be accommodated to diverse epigenetic scenarios.     

A multi-layer method to study genome-scale positions of nucleosomes

The basic unit of eukaryotic chromatin is the nucleosome, consisting of about 150 bp of DNA wrapped around a protein core made of histone proteins. Nucleosomes position is modulated in vivo to regulate fundamental nuclear processes. To measure nucleosome positions on a genomic scale both theoretical and experimental approaches have been recently reported. We have developed a new method, Multi-Layer Model (MLM), for the analysis of nucleosome position data obtained with microarray-based approach. The MLM is a feature extraction method in which the input data is processed by a classifier to distinguish between several kinds of patterns. We applied our method to simulated-synthetic and experimental nucleosome position data and found that besides a high nucleosome recognition and a strong agreement with standard statistical methods, the MLM can identify distinct classes of nucleosomes, making it an important tool for the genome wide analysis of nucleosome position and function. In conclusion, the MLM allows a better representation of nucleosome position data and a significant reduction in computational time.     

DNA Physical Properties and Nucleosome Positions Are Major Determinants of HIV-1 Integrase Selectivity

Retroviral integrases (INs) catalyse the integration of the reverse transcribed viral DNA into the host cell genome. This process is selective, and chromatin has been proposed to be a major factor regulating this step in the viral life cycle. However, the precise underlying mechanisms are still under investigation. We have developed a new in vitro integration assay using physiologically-relevant, reconstituted genomic acceptor chromatin and high-throughput determination of nucleosome positions and integration sites, in parallel. A quantitative analysis of the resulting data reveals a chromatin-dependent redistribution of the integration sites and establishes a link between integration sites and nucleosome positions. The co-activator LEDGF/p75 enhanced integration but did not modify the integration sites under these conditions. We also conducted an in cellulo genome-wide comparative study of nucleosome positions and human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) integration sites identified experimentally in vivo. These studies confirm a preferential integration in nucleosome-covered regions. Using a DNA mechanical energy model, we show that the physical properties of DNA probed by IN binding are important in determining IN selectivity. These novel in vitro and in vivo approaches confirm that IN has a preference for integration into a nucleosome, and suggest the existence of two levels of IN selectivity. The first depends on the physical properties of the target DNA and notably, the energy required to fit DNA into the IN catalytic pocket. The second depends on the DNA deformation associated with DNA wrapping around a nucleosome. Taken together, these results indicate that HIV-1 IN is a shape-readout DNA binding protein.     

Reproducibility and Consistency of In Vitro Nucleosome Reconstitutions Demonstrated by Invitrosome Isolation and Sequencing

Nucleosomes and their positions in the eukaryotic genome play an important role in regulating gene expression by influencing accessibility to DNA. Many factors influence a nucleosome''s final position in the chromatin landscape including the underlying genomic sequence. One of the primary reasons for performing in vitro nucleosome reconstitution experiments is to identify how the underlying DNA sequence will influence a nucleosome''s position in the absence of other compounding cellular factors. However, concerns have been raised about the reproducibility of data generated from these kinds of experiments. Here we present data for in vitro nucleosome reconstitution experiments performed on linear plasmid DNA that demonstrate that, when coverage is deep enough, these reconstitution experiments are exquisitely reproducible and highly consistent. Our data also suggests that a coverage depth of 35X be maintained for maximal confidence when assaying nucleosome positions, but lower coverage levels may be generally sufficient. These coverage depth recommendations are sufficient in the experimental system and conditions used in this study, but may vary depending on the exact parameters used in other systems.     

Antagonistic forces that position nucleosomes in vivo

ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes are implicated in many areas of chromosome biology. However, the physiological role of many of these enzymes is still unclear. In budding yeast, the Isw2 complex slides nucleosomes along DNA. By analyzing the native chromatin structure of Isw2 targets, we have found that nucleosomes adopt default, DNA-directed positions when ISW2 is deleted. We provide evidence that Isw2 targets contain DNA sequences that are inhibitory to nucleosome formation and that these sequences facilitate the formation of nuclease-accessible open chromatin in the absence of Isw2. Our data show that the biological function of Isw2 is to position nucleosomes onto unfavorable DNA. These results reveal that antagonistic forces of Isw2 and the DNA sequence can control nucleosome positioning and genomic access in vivo.     

A translational signature for nucleosome positioning in vivo

In vivo nucleosomes often occupy well-defined preferred positions on genomic DNA. An important question is to what extent these preferred positions are directly encoded by the DNA sequence itself. We derive here from in vivo positions, accurately mapped by partial micrococcal nuclease digestion, a translational positioning signal that identifies the approximate midpoint of DNA bound by a histone octamer. This midpoint is, on average, highly A/T rich (∼73%) and, in particular, the dinucleotide TpA occurs preferentially at this and other outward-facing minor grooves. We conclude that in this set of sequences the sequence code for DNA bending and nucleosome positioning differs from the other described sets and we suggest that the enrichment of AT-containing dinucleotides at the centre is required for local untwisting. We show that this signature is preferentially associated with nucleosomes flanking promoter regions and suggest that it contributes to the establishment of gene-specific nucleosome arrays.     

A Comparison of In Vitro Nucleosome Positioning Mapped with Chicken,Frog and a Variety of Yeast Core Histones

Using high-throughput sequencing, we have mapped sequence-directed nucleosome positioning in vitro on four plasmid DNAs containing DNA fragments derived from the genomes of sheep, drosophila, human and yeast. Chromatins were prepared by reconstitution using chicken, frog and yeast core histones. We also assembled yeast chromatin in which histone H3 was replaced by the centromere-specific histone variant, Cse4. The positions occupied by recombinant frog and native chicken histones were found to be very similar. In contrast, nucleosomes containing the canonical yeast octamer or, in particular, the Cse4 octamer were assembled at distinct populations of locations, a property that was more apparent on particular genomic DNA fragments. The factors that may contribute to this variation in nucleosome positioning and the implications of the behavior are discussed.     

DNA engineering shows that nucleosome phasing on the African green monkey alpha-satellite is the result of multiple additive histone-DNA interactions

The mechanism underlying sequence-specific positioning of nucleosomes on DNA was investigated. African green monkey alpha-satellite DNA was reconstituted in vitro with histones. Histone octamers were found to adopt one major and several minor positions on the satellite repeat unit, very similar to those positions found previously in vitro, demonstrating that sequence-specific histone-DNA interactions are responsible for nucleosome positioning on this DNA. In order to understand the nature of these interactions in more detail, we have constructed a variant satellite fragment containing an insertion of half a helical DNA turn. The parent fragment directs histones to one major and two overlapping minor positions that are all affected by the insertion. All three frames respond in a unique fashion to the additional five base-pairs. From a quantitative analysis of the nucleosome positions on the engineered fragment, consensus "phasing boxes" as the basis for nucleosome positioning can be ruled out. Instead, our results argue very strongly that nucleosome positioning is due to the independent contribution of many different DNA-histone contacts along the entire core particle, in an apparently additive fashion.     

Using DNA mechanics to predict in vitro nucleosome positions and formation energies

In eukaryotic genomes, nucleosomes function to compact DNA and to regulate access to it both by simple physical occlusion and by providing the substrate for numerous covalent epigenetic tags. While competition with other DNA-binding factors and action of chromatin remodeling enzymes significantly affect nucleosome formation in vivo, nucleosome positions in vitro are determined by steric exclusion and sequence alone. We have developed a biophysical model, DNABEND, for the sequence dependence of DNA bending energies, and validated it against a collection of in vitro free energies of nucleosome formation and a set of in vitro nucleosome positions mapped at high resolution. We have also made a first ab initio prediction of nucleosomal DNA geometries, and checked its accuracy against the nucleosome crystal structure. We have used DNABEND to design both strong and weak histone- binding sequences, and measured the corresponding free energies of nucleosome formation. We find that DNABEND can successfully predict in vitro nucleosome positions and free energies, providing a physical explanation for the intrinsic sequence dependence of histone–DNA interactions.     

Nucleosome positioning: How is it established, and why does it matter?

Packaging of eukaryotic genomes into chromatin affects every process that occurs on DNA. The positioning of nucleosomes on underlying DNA plays a key role in the regulation of these processes, as the nucleosome occludes underlying DNA sequences. Here, we review the literature on mapping nucleosome positions in various organisms, and discuss how nucleosome positions are established, what effect nucleosome positioning has on control of gene expression, and touch on the correlations between chromatin packaging, sequence evolution, and the evolution of gene expression programs.     

Nucleosome DNA Bendability Matrix (C. elegans)

Abstract

An original signal extraction procedure is applied to database of 146 base nucleosome core DNA sequences from C. elegans (S. M. Johnson et al. Genome Research 16, 1505–1516, 2006). The positional preferences of various dinucleotides within the 10.4 base nucleosome DNA repeat are calculated, resulting in derivation of the nucleosome DNA bendability matrix of 16x10 elements. A simplified one-line presentation of the matrix (“consensus” repeat) is…A(TTTCCGGAAA)T…. All 6 chromosomes of C. elegans conform to the bendability pattern. The strongest affinity to their respective positions is displayed by dinucleotides AT and CG, separated within the repeat by 5 bases. The derived pattern makes a basis for sequence-directed mapping of nucleosome positions in the genome of C. elegans. As the first complete matrix of bendability available the pattern may serve for iterative calculations of the species-specific matrices of bendability applicable to other genomic sequences.