Rhodopsin's carboxyl-terminal threonines are required for wild-type arrestin-mediated quench of transducin activation in vitro

Many recent reports have demonstrated that rhodopsin's carboxyl-terminal serine residues are the main targets for phosphorylation by rhodopsin kinase. Phosphorylation at the serines would therefore be expected to promote high-affinity arrestin binding. We have examined the roles of the carboxyl serine and threonine residues during arrestin-mediated deactivation of rhodopsin using an in vitro transducin activation assay. Mutations were introduced into a synthetic bovine rhodopsin gene and expressed in COS-7 cells. Individual serine and threonine residues were substituted with neutral amino acids. The ability of the mutants to act as substrates for rhodopsin kinase was analyzed. The effect of arrestin on the activities of the phosphorylated mutant rhodopsins was measured in a GTPgammaS binding assay involving purified bovine arrestin, rhodopsin kinase, and transducin. A rhodopsin mutant lacking the carboxyl serine and threonine residues was not phosphorylated by rhodopsin kinase, demonstrating that phosphorylation is restricted to the seven putative phosphorylation sites. A rhodopsin mutant possessing a single phosphorylatable serine at 338 demonstrated no phosphorylation-dependent quench by arrestin. These results suggest that singly phosphorylated rhodopsin is deactivated through a mechanism that does not involve arrestin. Analysis of additional mutants revealed that the presence of threonine in the carboxyl tail of rhodopsin provides for greater arrestin-mediated quench than does serine. These results suggest that phosphorylation site selection could serve as a mechanism to modulate the ability of arrestin to quench rhodopsin.     

Rapid and reproducible deactivation of rhodopsin requires multiple phosphorylation sites

Efficient single-photon detection by retinal rod photoreceptors requires timely and reproducible deactivation of rhodopsin. Like other G protein-coupled receptors, rhodopsin contains multiple sites for phosphorylation at its COOH-terminal domain. Transgenic and electrophysiological methods were used to functionally dissect the role of the multiple phosphorylation sites during deactivation of rhodopsin in intact mouse rods. Mutant rhodopsins bearing zero, one (S338), or two (S334/S338) phosphorylation sites generated single-photon responses with greatly prolonged, exponentially distributed durations. Responses from rods expressing mutant rhodopsins bearing more than two phosphorylation sites declined along smooth, reproducible time courses; the rate of recovery increased with increasing numbers of phosphorylation sites. We conclude that multiple phosphorylation of rhodopsin is necessary for rapid and reproducible deactivation.     

Mass spectrometric analysis of the kinetics of in vivo rhodopsin phosphorylation

On stimulation, rhodopsin, the light-sensing protein in the rod cells of the retina, is phosphorylated at several sites on its C terminus as the first step in deactivation. We have developed a mass spectrometry-based method to quantify the kinetics of phosphorylation at each site in vivo. After exposing either a freshly dissected mouse retina or the eye of an anesthetized mouse to a flash of light, phosphorylation and dephosphorylation reactions are terminated by rapidly homogenizing the retina or enucleated eye in 8 M urea. The C-terminal peptide containing all known phosphorylation sites is cleaved from rhodopsin, partially purified by ultracentrifugation, and analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LCMS). The mass spectrometer responds linearly to the peptide from 10 fmole to 100 pmole. The relative sensitivity to peptides with zero to five phosphates was determined using purified phosphopeptide standards. High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS) was used to distinguish the three primary sites of phosphorylation, Ser 334, Ser 338, and Ser 343. Peptides monophosphorylated on Ser 334 were separable from those monophosphorylated on Ser 338 and Ser 343 by reversed-phase HPLC. Although peptides monophosphorylated at Ser 338 and Ser 343 normally coelute, the relative amounts of each species in the single peak could be determined by monitoring the ratio of specific daughter ions characteristic of each peptide. Doubly phosphorylated rhodopsin peptides with different sites of phosphorylation also were distinguished by LCMS/MS. The sensitivity of these methods was evaluated by using them to measure rhodopsin phosphorylation stimulated either by light flashes or by continuous illumination over a range of intensities.     

Binding of arrestin to cytoplasmic loop mutants of bovine rhodopsin

The binding of arrestin to rhodopsin is a multistep process that begins when arrestin interacts with the phosphorylated C terminus of rhodopsin. This interaction appears to induce a conformational change in arrestin that exposes a high-affinity binding site for rhodopsin. Several studies in which synthetic peptides were used have suggested that sites on the rhodopsin cytoplasmic loops are involved in this interaction. However, the precise amino acids on rhodopsin that participate in this interaction are unknown. This study addresses the role of specific amino acids in the cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin in binding arrestin through the use of site-directed mutagenesis and direct binding assays. A series of alanine mutants within the three cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin were expressed in HEK-293 cells, reconstituted with 11-cis-retinal, prephosphorylated with rhodopsin kinase, and examined for their ability to bind in vitro-translated, 35S-labeled arrestin. Mutations at Asn-73 in loop I as well as at Pro-142 and Met-143 in loop II resulted in dramatic decreases in the level of arrestin binding, whereas the level of phosphorylation by rhodopsin kinase was similar to that of wild-type rhodopsin. The results indicate that these amino acids play a significant role in arrestin binding.     

The interaction with the cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin plays a crucial role in arrestin activation and binding

The binding of arrestin to rhodopsin is initiated by the interaction of arrestin with the phosphorylated rhodopsin C-terminus and/or the cytoplasmic loops, followed by conformational changes that expose an additional high-affinity site on arrestin. Here we use an arrestin mutant (R175E) that binds similarly to phosphorylated and unphosphorylated, wild-type rhodopsin to identify rhodopsin elements other than C-terminus important for arrestin interaction. R175E-arrestin demonstrated greatly reduced binding to unphosphorylated cytoplasmic loop mutants L72A, N73A, P142A and M143A, suggesting that these residues are crucial for high-affinity binding. Interestingly, when these rhodopsin mutants are phosphorylated, R175E-arrestin binding is less severely affected. This effect of phosphorylation on R175E-arrestin binding highlights the co-operative nature of the multi-site interaction between arrestin and the cytoplasmic loops and C-terminus of rhodopsin. However, a combination of any two mutations disrupts the ability of phosphorylation to enhance binding of R175E-arrestin. N73A, P142A and M143A exhibited accelerated rates of dissociation from wild-type arrestin. Using sensitivity to calpain II as an assay, these cytoplasmic loop mutants also demonstrated reduced ability to induce conformational changes in arrestin that correlated with their reduced ability to bind arrestin. These results suggest that arrestin bound to rhodopsin is in a distinct conformation that is co-ordinately regulated by association with the cytoplasmic loops and the C-terminus of rhodopsin.     

Human complement 5a (C5a) anaphylatoxin receptor (CD88) phosphorylation sites and their specific role in receptor phosphorylation and attenuation of G protein-mediated responses. Desensitization of C5a receptor controls superoxide production but not receptor sequestration in HL-60 cells

Upon agonist binding, the anaphylatoxin human complement 5a receptor (C5aR) has previously been found to be phosphorylated on the six serine residues of its carboxyl-terminal tail (Giannini, E., Brouchon, L., and Boulay, F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19166-19172). To evaluate the precise roles that specific phosphorylation sites may play in receptor signaling, a series of mutants were expressed transiently in COS-7 cells and stably in the physiologically relevant myeloid HL-60 cells. Ser(334) was found to be a key residue that controls receptor phosphorylation. Phosphorylation of either of two serine pairs, namely Ser(332) and Ser(334) or Ser(334) and Ser(338), was critical for the phosphorylation of C5aR and its subsequent desensitization. Full phosphorylation and desensitization of C5aR were obtained when these serines were replaced by aspartic acid residues. The mutation S338A had no marked effect on the agonist-mediated phosphorylation of C5aR, but it allowed a sustained C5a-evoked calcium mobilization in HL-60 cells. These findings and the ability of the S314A/S317A/S327A/S332A mutant receptor to undergo desensitization indicate that the phosphorylation of Ser(334) and Ser(338) is critical and sufficient for C5aR desensitization. The lack of phosphorylation was found to result not only in a sustained calcium mobilization and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 activity but also in the enhancement of the C5a-mediated respiratory burst in neutrophil-like HL-60 cells. For instance, the nonphosphorylatable S332A/S334A mutant receptor triggered a 1.8-2-fold higher production of superoxide as compared with the wild-type receptor. Interestingly, although the desensitization of this mutant was defective, it was sequestered with the same time course and the same efficiency as the wild-type receptor. Thus, in myeloid HL-60 cells, desensitization and sequestration of C5aR appear to occur through divergent molecular mechanisms.     

Mechanistic studies on rhodopsin kinase. Light-dependent phosphorylation of C-terminal peptides of rhodopsin.

The phosphorylation of a synthetic peptide, corresponding to the C-terminal 11 amino acids of bovine rhodopsin (VII, residues 338-348), was studied under different conditions. The peptide was only phosphorylated in the presence of photoactivated rhodopsin. Using the same protocol, 12 other peptides, mapping in the rhodopsin C-terminal, were screened for their effectiveness as substrates for rhodopsin kinase. It was found that the peptides became poorer substrates with increasing length, and the best substrates comprised the most C-terminal 9-12 amino acids as opposed to other parts of the C-terminus. It was noted that the absence of the two-terminal residues Pro347 and Ala348 impaired peptide phosphorylation. The effect of the decay of metarhodopsin II on the phosphorylation of rhodopsin and the peptides was determined, and it was found that the rhodopsin and peptide phosphorylations decayed with half times of approximately 33 min and 28 min, respectively. The sites of phosphorylation on the peptides were determined and in all cases the phosphorylation was found to be predominantly on serine residues. Only the 11-residue peptide (VII, residues 338-348) contained significant threonine phosphorylation, which was about 25% that on serine residues. Cumulatively, the results suggest that Ser343 is the preferred site of phosphorylation in vitro. The reason for the poor substrate effectiveness of the larger peptides was examined by competitive experiments in which it was shown that a poorly phosphorylated larger peptide successfully inhibited the phosphorylation of a 'good' peptide substrate. The studies above support a mechanism for rhodopsin kinase that we have termed the 'kinase-activation hypothesis'. This requires that the kinase exists in an inactive form and is activated only after binding to photoactivated rhodopsin.     

Interactions of metarhodopsin II. Arrestin peptides compete with arrestin and transducin

Arrestin blocks the interaction of rhodopsin with the G protein transducin (G(t)). To characterize the sites of arrestin that interact with rhodopsin, we have utilized a spectrophotometric peptide competition assay. It is based on the stabilization of the active intermediates metarhodopsin II (MII) and phosphorylated MII by G(t) and arrestin, respectively (extra MII monitor). The protocol involves native disc membranes and three sets of peptides 10-30 amino acids in length spanning the arrestin sequence. In the absence of arrestin, not one of the peptides by itself had an effect on the amount of MII formed. However, inhibition of arrestin-dependent extra MII was found for the peptides at residues 11-30 and 51-70 (IC(50) < 100 microm) and residues 231-260 (IC(50) < 200 microm). A similar pattern of inhibition by arrestin peptides was seen when arrestin was replaced by G(t) or the farnesylated G(t)gamma C-terminal peptide. Only arrestin-(11-30) inhibited MII.G(t) less (IC(50) = 300 microm) than phosphorylated MII.arrestin. We interpreted the data by competition of the arrestin peptides for interaction sites at rhodopsin, exposed in the MII conformation and specific for both arrestin and G(t). The arrestin sites are located in both the C- and N-terminal domains of the arrestin structure.     

Cell-free expression of visual arrestin. Truncation mutagenesis identifies multiple domains involved in rhodopsin interaction.

Visual arrestin plays an important role in regulating light responsiveness via its ability to specifically bind to the phosphorylated and light-activated form of rhodopsin. To further characterize rhodopsin/arrestin interactions we have utilized a rabbit reticulocyte lysate translation system to synthesize bovine visual arrestin. The translated arrestin (404 amino acids) was demonstrated to be fully functional in terms of its ability to specifically recognize and bind to phosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin (P-Rh*). Competitive binding studies revealed that the in vitro synthesized arrestin and purified bovine visual arrestin had comparable affinities for P-Rh*. In an effort to assess the functional role of different regions of the arrestin molecule, two truncated arrestin mutants were produced by cutting within the open reading frame of the bovine arrestin cDNA with selective restriction enzymes. In vitro translation of the transcribed truncated mRNAs resulted in the production of arrestins truncated from the carboxyl terminus. The ability of each of the mutant arrestins to bind to dark (Rh), light-activated (Rh*), dark phosphorylated (P-Rh), and light-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin were then compared. Arrestin lacking 39 carboxyl-terminal residues binds specifically not only to P-Rh* but also to Rh* and P-Rh. This suggests that the carboxyl-terminal domain of arrestin plays an important regulatory role in ensuring strict arrestin binding selectivity to P-Rh*. Arrestin that has only the first 191 amino-terminal residues predominately discriminates the phosphorylation state of the rhodopsin; however, it also retains some binding specificity for the activation state. These results suggest that the amino-terminal half of arrestin contains key rhodopsin recognition sites responsible for interaction with both the phosphorylated and light-activated forms of rhodopsin.     

Regulation of arrestin binding by rhodopsin phosphorylation level

Arrestins ensure the timely termination of receptor signaling. The role of rhodopsin phosphorylation in visual arrestin binding was established more than 20 years ago, but the effects of the number of receptor-attached phosphates on this interaction remain controversial. Here we use purified rhodopsin fractions with carefully quantified content of individual phosphorylated rhodopsin species to elucidate the impact of phosphorylation level on arrestin interaction with three biologically relevant functional forms of rhodopsin: light-activated and dark phosphorhodopsin and phospho-opsin. We found that a single receptor-attached phosphate does not facilitate arrestin binding, two are necessary to induce high affinity interaction, and three phosphates fully activate arrestin. Higher phosphorylation levels do not increase the stability of arrestin complex with light-activated rhodopsin but enhance its binding to the dark phosphorhodopsin and phospho-opsin. The complex of arrestin with hyperphosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin is less sensitive to high salt and appears to release retinal faster. These data suggest that arrestin likely quenches rhodopsin signaling after the third phosphate is added by rhodopsin kinase. The complex of arrestin with heavily phosphorylated rhodopsin, which appears to form in certain disease states, has distinct characteristics that may contribute to the phenotype of these visual disorders.     

A Novel Polar Core and Weakly Fixed C-Tail in Squid Arrestin Provide New Insight into Interaction with Rhodopsin

Photoreceptors of the squid Loligo pealei contain a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling system that activates phospholipase C in response to light. Analogous to the mammalian visual system, signaling of the photoactivated GPCR rhodopsin is terminated by binding of squid arrestin (sArr). sArr forms a light-dependent, high-affinity complex with squid rhodopsin, which does not require prior receptor phosphorylation for interaction. This is at odds with classical mammalian GPCR desensitization where an agonist-bound phosphorylated receptor is needed to break stabilizing constraints within arrestins, the so-called “three-element interaction” and “polar core” network, before a stable receptor–arrestin complex can be established. Biophysical and mass spectrometric analysis of the squid rhodopsin–arrestin complex indicates that in contrast to mammalian arrestins, the sArr C-tail is not involved in a stable three-element interaction. We determined the crystal structure of C-terminally truncated sArr that adopts a basal conformation common to arrestins and is stabilized by a series of weak but novel polar core interactions. Unlike mammalian arrestin-1, deletion of the sArr C-tail does not influence kinetic properties of complex formation of sArr with the receptor. Hydrogen–deuterium exchange studies revealed the footprint of the light-activated rhodopsin on sArr. Furthermore, double electron–electron resonance spectroscopy experiments provide evidence that receptor-bound sArr adopts a conformation different from the one known for arrestin-1 and molecular dynamics simulations reveal the residues that account for the weak three-element interaction. Insights gleaned from studying this system add to our general understanding of GPCR–arrestin interaction.     

Identification of regions of arrestin that bind to rhodopsin

Arrestin facilitates phototransduction inactivation through binding to photoactivated and phosphorylated rhodopsin (RP). However, the specific portions of arrestin that bind to RP are not known. In this study, two different approaches were used to determine the regions of arrestin that bind to rhodopsin: panning of phage-displayed arrestin fragments against RP and cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity inhibition using synthetic arrestin peptides spanning the entire arrestin protein. Phage display indicated the predominant region of binding was contained within amino acids 90-140. A portion of this region (residues 95-140) expressed as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase is capable of binding to rhodopsin regardless of the activation or phosphorylation state of the receptor. Within this region, the synthetic peptide of residues 109-130 was shown to completely inhibit the binding of arrestin to rhodopsin with an IC50 of 1.1 mM. The relatively high IC50 of this competition suggests that this portion of the molecule may be only one of several regions of binding between arrestin and RP. A survey of synthetic arrestin peptides in the PDE assay indicated that the two most effective inhibitors of PDE activity were peptides of residues 111-130 and 101-120. These results indicate that at least one of the principal regions of binding between arrestin and RP is contained within the region of residues 109-130.     

Two C-terminal amino acids, Ser(334) and Ser(335), are required for homologous desensitization and agonist-induced phosphorylation of opioid receptor-like 1 receptors

Various cellular signaling pathways induced by nociceptin activation of ORL1 (opioid receptor-like 1 receptor) develop homologous desensitization. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that agonist-induced phosphorylation of serine (Ser)/threonine (Thr) residues at intracellular carboxyl tail leads to homologous desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors. In the present study, we investigated the functional role played by C-terminal Ser/Thr residues in agonist-induced desensitization and phosphorylation of ORL1. In HEK 293 cells expressing wild-type ORL1 and ORL1(CDelta21), which lacks C-terminal 21 amino acids, nociceptin inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity exhibited homologous desensitization after 1 h pretreatment of nociceptin. In contrast, ORL1(CDelta34), which differs with ORL1(CDelta21) by lacking C-terminal Ser(334), Ser(335) and Ser(343) residues, failed to develop agonist-induced desensitization. Point mutant (S343A) ORL1 underwent homologous desensitization after nociceptin pretreatment. Substituting Ser(334) or Ser(335) with alanine greatly impaired nociceptin-induced ORL1 desensitization. In HEK 293 cells expressing double mutant (S334A/S335A) ORL1, nociceptin pretreatment failed to significantly affect the efficacy and potency by which nociceptin inhibits forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation. Mutation of Ser(334) and Ser(335) also greatly reduced nociceptin-induced ORL1 phosphorylation. These results suggest that two C-terminal serine residues, Ser(334) and Ser(335), are required for homologous desensitization and agonist-induced phosphorylation of ORL1.     

Dynamics of protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation of the complement C5a receptor on serine 334

Upon agonist binding, the C5a anaphylatoxin receptor (C5aR) is rapidly phosphorylated on phosphorylation sites that are located within the C-terminal domain of the receptor. Previous studies suggested that C5aR phosphorylation proceeds in a hierarchical manner with serine 334 presenting a highly accessible priming site that controls subsequent phosphorylation at other positions. To better understand the dynamics of Ser-334 phosphorylation, we generated site-specific monoclonal antibodies that specifically react with phosphoserine 334. In differentiated U937 cells, which endogenously express C5aR, stimulation with low C5a concentrations resulted in a very rapid (t((1/2)) approximately 20 s), albeit transient, receptor phosphorylation. Whole cell phosphorylation assays with specific inhibitors as well as in vitro phosphorylation assays with recombinant enzymes and peptide substrates revealed that phosphorylation of Ser-334 is regulated by protein kinase C-beta and a calyculin A-sensitive protein phosphatase. Surprisingly, at high concentrations (>10 nM) of C5a, the protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation of Ser-334 was essentially blocked. This could be attributed to the even faster (t((1/2)) < 5 s) binding of beta-arrestin to the receptor. Analysis of C5aR Ser/Ala mutants that possess a single intact serine residue either at position 334 or at neighboring positions 327, 332, or 338 revealed functional redundancy of C-terminal phosphorylation sites since all 4 serine residues could individually support C5aR internalization and desensitization. This study is among the first to analyze in a detailed manner, using a non-mutational approach, modifications of a defined phosphorylation site in a G protein-coupled receptor and to correlate these findings with functional parameters of receptor deactivation.     

Phosphorylation modulates the affinity of light-activated rhodopsin for G protein and arrestin

Reduced effector activity and binding of arrestin are widely accepted consequences of GPCR phosphorylation. However, the effect of receptor multiphosphorylation on G protein activation and arrestin binding parameters has not previously been quantitatively examined. We have found receptor phosphorylation to alter both G protein and arrestin binding constants for light-activated rhodopsin in proportion to phosphorylation stoichiometry. Rod disk membranes containing different average receptor phosphorylation stoichiometries were combined with G protein or arrestin, and titrated with a series of brief light flashes. Binding of G(t) or arrestin to activated rhodopsin augmented the 390 nm MII optical absorption signal by stabilizing MII as MII.G or MII.Arr. The concentration of active arrestin or G(t) and the binding constant of each to MII were determined using a nonlinear least-squares (Simplex) reaction model analysis of the titration data. The binding affinity of phosphorylated MII for G(t) decreased while that for arrestin increased with each added phosphate. G(t) binds more tightly to MII at phosphorylation levels less than or equal to two phosphates per rhodopsin; at higher phosphorylation levels, arrestin binding is favored. However, arrestin was found to bind much more slowly than G(t) at all phosphorylation levels, perhaps allowing time for phosphorylation to gradually reduce receptor-G protein interaction before arrestin capping of rhodopsin. Sensitivity of the binding constants to ionic strength suggests that a strong membrane electrostatic component is involved in both the reduction of G(t) binding and the increase of arrestin binding with increasing rhodopsin phosphorylation.     

Arrestin binding to the M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor is precluded by an inhibitory element in the third intracellular loop of the receptor

Desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involves the binding of members of the family of arrestins to the receptors. In the model system involving the visual GPCR rhodopsin, activation and phosphorylation of rhodopsin is thought to convert arrestin from a low to high affinity binding state. Phosphorylation of the M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) has been shown to be required for binding of arrestins 2 and 3 in vitro and for arrestin-enhanced internalization in intact cells (Pals-Rylaarsdam, R., and Hosey, M. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14152-14158). For the M(2) mAChR, arrestin binding requires phosphorylation at multiple serine and threonine residues at amino acids 307-311 in the third intracellular (i3) loop. Here, we have investigated the molecular basis for the requirement of receptor phosphorylation for arrestin binding. Constructs of arrestin 2 that can bind to other GPCRs in a phosphorylation-independent manner were unable to interact with a mutant M(2) mAChR in which the Ser/Thr residues at 307-311 were mutated to alanines. However, although phosphorylation-deficient mutants of the M(2) mAChR that lacked 50-157 amino acids from the i3 loop were unable to undergo agonist-dependent internalization when expressed alone in tsA201 cells, co-expression of arrestin 2 or 3 restored agonist-dependent internalization. Furthermore, a deletion of only 15 amino acids (amino acids 304-319) was sufficient to allow for phosphorylation-independent arrestin-receptor interaction. These results indicate that phosphorylation at residues 307-311 does not appear to be required to activate arrestin into a high affinity binding state. Instead, phosphorylation at residues 307-311 appears to facilitate the removal of an inhibitory constraint that precludes receptor-arrestin association in the absence of receptor phosphorylation.     

Functionally discrete mimics of light-activated rhodopsin identified through expression of soluble cytoplasmic domains

Numerous studies on the seven-helix receptor rhodopsin have implicated the cytoplasmic loops and carboxyl-terminal region in the binding and activation of proteins involved in visual transduction and desensitization. In our continuing studies on rhodopsin folding, assembly, and structure, we have attempted to reconstruct the interacting surface(s) for these proteins by inserting fragments corresponding to the cytoplasmic loops and/or the carboxyl-terminal tail of bovine opsin either singly, or in combination, onto a surface loop in thioredoxin. The purpose of the thioredoxin fusion is to provide a soluble scaffold for the cytoplasmic fragments thereby allowing them sufficient conformational freedom to fold to a structure that mimics the protein-binding sites on light-activated rhodopsin. All of the fusion proteins are expressed to relatively high levels in Escherichia coli and can be purified using a two- or three-step chromatography procedure. Biochemical studies show that some of the fusion proteins effectively mimic the activated conformation(s) of rhodopsin in stimulating G-protein or competing with the light-activated rhodopsin/G-protein interaction, in supporting phosphorylation of the carboxyl-terminal opsin fragment by rhodopsin kinase, and/or phosphopeptide-stimulated arrestin binding. These results suggest that specific segments of the cytoplasmic surface of rhodopsin can adopt functionally discrete conformations in the absence of the connecting transmembrane helices and retinal chromophore.     

Probing rhodopsin-transducin interactions by surface modification and mass spectrometry

The interactions of rhodopsin and the alpha-subunit of transducin (G(t)) have been mapped using a surface modification "footprinting" approach in conjunction with mass spectrometric analysis employing a synthetic peptide corresponding to C-terminal residues 340-350 of the alpha-subunit of G(t), G(t)alpha(340-350). Membrane preparations of unactivated (Rh) and light-activated rhodopsin (Rh*), each in the presence or absence of G(t)alpha(340-350), were acetylated with the water-soluble reagent sulfosuccinimidyl acetate, and the extent of the acetylation was determined by mass spectrometry. By comparing the differences in acetylation among Rh, Rh*, and the Rh-G(t)alpha(340-350) and Rh*-G(t)alpha(340-350) complexes, we demonstrate that the surface exposure of the acetylation sites was reduced by the conformational change associated with light activation, and that binding of G(t)alpha(340-350) blocks acetylation sites on cytoplasmic loops 1, 2, and 4 of Rh*. In addition, we show evidence of interaction between the end of the C-terminal tail of rhodopsin and G(t)alpha in the unactivated state of rhodopsin.     

Arrestin and its splice variant Arr1-370A (p44). Mechanism and biological role of their interaction with rhodopsin

Deactivation of G-protein-coupled receptors relies on a timely blockade by arrestin. However, under dim light conditions, virtually all arrestin is in the rod inner segment, and the splice variant p(44) (Arr(1-370A)) is the stop protein responsible for receptor deactivation. Using size exclusion chromatography and biophysical assays for membrane-bound protein-protein interaction, membrane binding, and G-protein activation, we have investigated the interactions of Arr(1-370A) and proteolytically truncated Arr(3-367) with rhodopsin. We find that these short arrestins do not only interact with the phosphorylated active receptor but also with inactive phosphorylated rhodopsin or opsin in membranes or solution. Because of the latter interaction they are not soluble (like arrestin) but membrane-bound in the dark. Upon photoexcitation, Arr(3-367) and Arr(1-370A) interact with prephosphorylated rhodopsin faster than arrestin and start to quench G(t) activation on a subsecond time scale. The data indicate that in the course of rhodopsin deactivation, Arr(1-370A) is handed over from inactive to active phosphorylated rhodopsin. This mechanism could provide a new aspect of receptor shutoff in the single photon operating range of the rod cell.     

Characterization of rhodopsin kinase purified from bovine rod outer segments

Rhodopsin kinase was purified by sequential chromatography on DEAE-cellulose and blue-Sepharose. Kinase activity co-purified with a 62-kDa polypeptide, which bound light-dependently in the absence of ATP to purified vesicle-reconstituted rhodopsin. Purified rhodopsin kinase is free of any detectable arrestin or the retinal G-protein. Rhodopsin kinase is autophosphorylated on serine residues which is unaffected by the presence of bleached rhodopsin and results in a transition in molecular mass to 64 kDa. Autophosphorylation of the kinase did not appear to alter the overall rate of rhodopsin phosphorylation or the apparent KM (0.6 microM) for purified reconstituted rhodopsin. Peptides corresponding to sequences within opsin loops 3-4 and 5-6 and the COOH terminus inhibited kinase phosphorylation of bleached rhodopsin, suggesting at least three potential sites to account for the stable high affinity binding of rhodopsin kinase to the bleached photoreceptor molecule that are at least in part distinct from the substrate sites for phosphorylation. These sequences are similar to those proposed for receptor recognition of G-proteins and indicate that the domains involved in light-dependent binding of rhodopsin kinase and retinal G-protein are similar or overlapping.