首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到2条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Modulation of Opioid Receptor Binding by Cis and Trans Fatty Acids   总被引:1,自引:2,他引:1  
In synaptosomal brain membranes, the addition of oleic acid (cis), elaidic acid (trans), and the cis and trans isomers of vaccenic acid, at a concentration of 0.87 mumol of lipid/mg of protein, strongly reduced the Bmax and, to a lesser degree, the binding affinity of the mu-selective opioid [3H]Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-(Me)Phe-Gly-ol ([3H]DAMGO). At comparable membrane content, the cis isomers of the fatty acids were more potent than their trans counterparts in inhibiting ligand binding and in decreasing membrane microviscosity, both at the membrane surface and in the core. However, trans-vacenic acid affected opioid receptor binding in spite of just marginally altering membrane microviscosity. If the receptors were uncoupled from guanine nucleotide regulatory protein, an altered inhibition profile was obtained: the impairment of KD by the fatty acids was enhanced and that of Bmax reduced. Receptor interaction of the delta-opioid [3H](D-Pen2,D-Pen5)enkephalin was modulated by lipids to a greater extent than that of [3H]DAMGO: saturable binding was abolished by both oleic and elaidic acids. The binding of [3H]naltrexone was less susceptible to inhibition by the fatty acids, particularly in the presence of sodium. In the absence of this cation, however, cis-vaccenic acid abolished the low-affinity binding component of [3H]naltrexone. These findings support the membrane model of opioid receptor sequestration depicting different ionic environments for the mu- and delta-binding sites. The results of this work show distinct modulation of different types and molecular states of opioid receptor by fatty acids through mechanisms involving membrane fluidity and specific interactions with membrane constituents.  相似文献   

2.
Differences in binding properties of mu and delta opioid receptors were investigated using DAGO (Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-MePhe-Gly-ol) and DTLET (Tyr-D-Thr-Gly-Phe-Leu-Thr), which occur, respectively, as the most selective mu and delta radioligands available. At high concentration, each agonist is able to interact with its nonspecific sites. Competition experiments indicated that a two-site competitive model was adequate to explain the interactions of DAGO and DTLET with [3H]DTLET and [3H]DAGO binding sites, respectively. The weak cross-reactivity (congruent to 10%) of DTLET for mu sites was taken into account in these experiments. On the other hand, DAGO and DTLET exhibit differential binding kinetics. Thus, at 35 degrees C, the lifetime of DTLET within its receptor site is about 14 times longer than that of the mu agonist. Sodium and manganese ions decrease the maximal number of high affinity mu and delta sites, but the sensitivity of mu receptors is three times higher towards Na+ and 20-fold higher towards Mn2+ than that of delta receptors. GTP reduces similarly the mu and delta binding whereas only the DAGO binding was modified by the nonhydrolyzable analogue guanylylimidodiphosphate [GMP-P(NH)P]. However, in the presence of Na+ ions, GMP-P(NH)P inhibits the DTLET binding in a concentration-dependent manner. The effects of Na+ and GMP-P(NH)P could be explained by a sequential transformation of delta receptors to low-affinity states. This model predicts that Na+, by lowering the affinity of a fraction of sites, produces a decrease in the maximal number of high-affinity delta receptors and that GMP-P(NH)P enhances the Na+ effect. Moreover, the binding kinetic to this high-affinity state was also modified by Na+ and nucleotides. All of these data support the existence of two independent mu and delta binding sites, the properties of which are differentially regulated by these endogenous effectors.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号