Community Endocrine Surgical Experience With False-Negative Afirma Gec® Results: 2011–2017

Objective: Afirma Gene Expression Classifier® (Afirma GEC) molecular analysis (Veracyte, Inc, San Francisco, CA) is a negative predictive value test developed to reduce the number of thyroidectomies in thyroid nodule patients with indeterminate cytology. GEC technology has reportedly reduced unnecessary thyroid surgery, but few studies have examined Afirma GEC false-negative rates, since usually patients with GEC benign nodules do not undergo surgery for definitive diagnosis. Occasionally, Afirma GEC benign patients require removal of their thyroid nodules for other reasons; this work describes the incidence of malignancy and noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) in this population.Methods: We reviewed our community endocrine surgical practice database for patients who had undergone thyroid surgery from January 2011 through April 2017 despite benign Afirma GEC results.Results: Afirma GEC testing was completed for 475 patients during the study period. Surgery was clinically indicated for other reasons in 42 of the 193 patients (22%) with Afirma GEC benign results. Malignancy or NIFTP in the targeted nodule was found in the final histologic evaluation of 14 of the 42 Afirma GEC benign surgical patients. The Afirma GEC false-negative percentage for our incomplete surgical group (FNP-ISG), defined as the surgically proven false negatives divided by the total Afirma GEC benign patients, was 7.3%.Conclusion: Our high surgical rate in Afirma GEC benign nodules reveals an FNP-ISG of 7.3% in our community endocrine surgical patient population; this value exceeds the 5.7% reported in the multicenter 2012 Afirma GEC validation study.Abbreviations: Afirma GEC = Afirma Gene Expression Classifier; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; FNP = false-negative percentage; FNP-ISG = false-negative percentage for an incomplete surgical group; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features     

Statistical Comparison of Afirma Gsc and Afirma Gec Outcomes in a Community Endocrine Surgical Practice: Early Findings

Objective: The Veracyte Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) has been the most widely used negative predictive value molecular classifier for indeterminate cytology thyroid nodules since January 2011. To improve the specificity and further reduce unnecessary thyroid surgeries, a second-generation assay (Afirma Genetic Sequence Classifier [GSC]) was released for clinical use in August 2017. We report 11 months of clinical outcomes experience with the GSC and compare them to our 6.5-year experience with the GEC.Methods: We searched our practice registry for FNAB nodules with Afirma results from January 2011through June 2018. GEC versus GSC results were compared overall, in oncocytic and nononcocytic aspirates and by pathologic outcomes.Results: GSC identified less indeterminate cytology nodules as suspicious (38.8%; 54/139) when compared to GEC (58.4%; 281/481). There was a decrease of in the percentage of oncocytic fine-needle aspiration thyroid biopsy (FNAB) subjects classified as suspicious in the GSC group, with 86 of 104 oncocytic indeterminates (82.7%) classified as suspicious by GEC and 12 of 34 (35.3%) classified as suspicious by GSC. The surgery rate in patients with oncocytic aspirates fell from 56% in the GEC group to 31% in the GSC-evaluated group (45%). Pathology analysis demonstrated a false-negative percentage for an incomplete surgical group of 9.5% for GEC and 1.2% for GSC.Conclusion: Our GSC data suggest that the GSC further reduces surgery in indeterminate thyroid nodules by improving the specificity of Afirma technology without compromising sensitivity. A primary determinant for this change is a significant improvement in the specificity of the Afirma GSC test in oncocytic FNAB aspirates.Abbreviations: FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy; GEC = Gene Expression Classifier; GSC = Genetic Sequence Classifier     

Utility of Afirma Gene Expression Classifier for Evaluation of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules and Correlation with Ultrasound Risk Assessment: Single Institutional Experience

Objective: We assessed our experience with Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) combined with sono-graphic risk assessment, using both the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) in evaluating indeterminate thyroid nodules.Methods: We identified 98 patients with 101 nodules who had a second fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2017, and sent to Veracyte for cytopathology and subsequent Afirma GEC testing. A second FNA biopsy was performed if the initial cytopathology was either Bethesda III or IV (n = 94) or nondiagnostic (n = 7). We correlated cytopathology, histopathology, and Afirma GEC results with sonographic risk assessment using both the ATA system and TI-RADS.Results: The mean age of the cohort was 57.4 ± 12.3 years; 84% women and 60% white. Repeat FNA was benign in 51 of 101 nodules, and of the remaining 50 nodules, 18 (36%) were GEC-benign and 32 (64%) GEC-suspicious. Eighteen of the 32 GEC-suspicious nodules underwent surgery with the following results: 7 benign (39%), 1 follicular thyroid carcinoma (6%), 6 follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer (33%), and 4 noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features (22%). The malignancy rate among the surgical cohort was 39% (without noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features [NIFTP]) and 61% (with NIFTP) and about 50% and 20% of this group scored in the high suspicion category by ATA and TR5 by TI-RADS, respectively.Conclusion: Afirma GEC was useful in avoiding surgery in one-third of indeterminate nodules and performed similarly to ATA and TI-RADS. However, the use of echogenicity in scoring may underestimate the risk of malignancy in patients with indeterminate nodules.Abbreviations:ATA = American Thyroid Association; AUS = Atypia of Undetermined Significance; FLUS = Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance; FN = follicular neoplasm; FNA = fine needle aspiration; FTC = follicular thyroid cancer; FVPTC = follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer; GEC = Gene Expression Classifier; ND = nondiagnostic; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; TR = TI-RADS     

Quality of Life Following Molecular Marker Testing for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Objective: Thyroid cancer has a disproportionately negative effect on the quality of life (QOL) compared to malignancies with a worse prognosis. The QOL of patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules has not been previously evaluated. We aimed to assess the impact of molecular test results on the QOL of patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules.Methods: A short version of the Thyroid-Related Patient-Reported Outcome (ThyPro-39) was used to assess the QOL of patients who underwent thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy throughout UCLA Health from May, 2016, to June, 2017. All patients with indeterminate biopsy results underwent molecular testing with either Afirma Gene Expression Classifier or ThyroSeq v2 at the time of the initial biopsy. The QOL associated with symptoms of goiter, anxiety, depression, and impaired daily life were analyzed.Results: Of 825 consented patients, 366 completed the assessment (44.4% response rate). FNA results included 76% benign, 7% malignant, and 17% indeterminate. There were no differences in QOL between patients with a benign FNA and patients with an indeterminate result with benign molecular testing. In patients with an indeterminate FNA, symptoms of goiter (20.5 versus 10.4; P = .033) and depression (33.3 versus 21.0; P = .026) were worse for patients with suspicious versus benign molecular test results; however, no significant differences were observed in anxiety or impaired daily life.Conclusion: A benign molecular test result may provide reassurance for patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules that the risk of malignancy is low. Long-term follow-up is necessary to determine if benign molecular test results maintain improved QOL.     

Utility of Ultrasound Versus Gene Expression Classifier in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance

Objective: Thyroid nodules with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology categorized as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) often undergo additional diagnostic analysis with the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC), which classifies these as either high probability of being benign (GEC-B) or suspicious for malignancy (GEC-S). Our goal was to assess the clinical validity and utility of GEC in the evaluation of AUS cytology and evaluate the performance of ultrasonography (USG) for predicting malignancy in this subset.Methods: We conducted a study with a retrospective cohort of patients from January 2012 to January 2014 who had FNA of thyroid nodules >1 cm in size with AUS cytology.Results: Cleveland Clinic Florida has an overall prevalence of AUS of 5%. A total of 119 cases with nodules >1 cm in size were reported as AUS. Forty-eight (40.3%) had a GEC performed after the first FNA (AUS-1), and 27 of these were GEC-S. Of those 27, 21 went for surgery and 14 (66.6%) had thyroid cancer on histopathology. The remaining 71 with AUS-1 were sent for a second FNA: 19 nodules were benign and did not undergo further evaluation, while the remaining 52 were reported as AUS for the second consecutive time (AUS-2). AUS-2 samples were sent for GEC. Of these 52 AUS-2, 38 (73.1%) were reported as GEC-S. Thirty-five went for surgery and 32 (91.4%) had confirmed malignancy on histopathology. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 91.4% for AUS-2 and 66.6% for AUS-1. Moreover, AUS-2 nodules that were hypoechoic and solid on USG showed a PPV of 92% for malignancy.Conclusion: In our practice, the diagnostic accuracy to predict malignancy with GEC for AUS-1 nodules was poor (PPV, 66.6%). The PPV of GEC testing was markedly higher at 91.4% performed after two consecutive AUS cytologies. AUS-2 nodules that were solid and hypoechoic on USG also had a high probability to be malignant (PPV, 92%). We recommend repeat FNA on AUS-1 nodules rather than proceeding directly to GEC testing. Also, we suggest that among AUS-2 nodules, surgery can be recommended when USG shows solid and hypoechoic features with GEC testing reserved for the remainder.Abbreviations:AUS = atypia of undetermined significanceFNA = fine-needle aspirationGEC = gene expression classifierGEC-B = GEC-benignGEC-S = GEC-suspicious for malignancyNPV = negative predictive valuePPV = positive predictive valueUSG = ultrasonography     

Value of Repeating A Nondiagnostic Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy

ObjectiveTo assess the value of repeating a biopsy when the initial thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is nondiagnostic.MethodsBetween 1990 and 2003, 4,311 thyroid FNAs were performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, of which 220 (5%) were nondiagnostic. Among 189 patients whose medical records were available for retrospective review, 106 underwent a repeated FNA (FNA #2), and 14 had a second repeated FNA (FNA #3). Thyroid ultrasonography was used in the evaluation in 113 FNAs.ResultsThe first and second repeated FNAs were diagnostic in 58% (62 of 106 patients) and 50% (7 of 14 patients), respectively. The rate of malignant disease in patients with no repeated FNAs versus 1 or more repeated FNAs was 4.8% (4 of 83) versus 11.3% (12 of 106), respectively. Ultrasound-guided FNA yielded a diagnosis among 33 of 113 biopsies (29.2%), and FNA without ultrasound guidance provided a diagnosis in 30 of 159 biopsies (18.9%). Thus, the use of thyroid ultrasonography significantly improved the likelihood of establishing a diagnosis (P = 0.017). We found that repeating the FNA up to 2 times provides a diagnosis in up to 60% of cases.ConclusionThe overall prevalence of thyroid cancer in patients with nondiagnostic FNA is not trivial—8.5% in our study group of 189 patients. An aggressive approach toward nondiagnostic FNA biopsies is recommended, with performance of at least 2 repeated FNA biopsies, preferably with the help of ultrasound guidance. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:735-742)     

Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007

S. Piana, A. Frasoldati, M. Ferrari, R. Valcavi, E. Froio, V. Barbieri, C. Pedroni and G. Gardini Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007 Objective: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) has long been recognized as an essential technique for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Although specific cytological patterns have been recognized, a wide variety of reporting schemes for thyroid FNA results have been adopted. This study reports our experience with a five‐category reporting scheme developed in‐house based on a numeric score and applied to a large series of consecutive thyroid FNAs. It focuses mainly on the accuracy of thyroid FNA as a preoperative test in a large subset of histologically distinct thyroid lesions. Methods: During the 1998–2007 period, 18 359 thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNAs were performed on 15 269 patients; FNA reports were classified according to a C1–C5 reporting scheme: non‐diagnostic (C1), benign (C2), indeterminate (C3), suspicious (C4), and malignant (C5). Results: Non‐diagnostic (C1) and indeterminate (C3) FNA results totalled 2 230 (12.1%) and 1 461 (7.9%), respectively, while suspicious (C4) and malignant (C5) results totalled 238 (1.3%) and 531 (2.9%), respectively. Histological results were available in 2 047 patients, with thyroid malignancy detected in 840. Positive predictive value of FNA was 98.1% with a 49.0 likelihood ratio (LR) of malignancy in patients with a C4/C5 FNA report. Conclusions: This five‐category scheme for thyroid FNA is accurate in discriminating between the virtual certainty of malignancy associated with C5, a high rate (92%) of malignancy associated with C4, and a 98% probability of a histological benign diagnosis associated with C2. Further sub‐classifications of C3 may improve the accuracy of the diagnostic scheme and may help in recognizing patients eligible for a ‘wait and see’ management.     

Thyroid Cytology and Risk of Thyroid Cancer: Differences Among Indeterminate Specimens

ObjectiveTo assess the potential for stratification of indeterminate cytologic findings on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules in an effort to improve therapeutic strategies.MethodsWe attempted to determine the malignant risk associated with various indeterminate FNA cytologic patterns by correlation of specimens with the final histologic diagnosis. For this analysis, we identified 294 computerized medical records of surgically treated thyroid nodules during a 5-year period at our institution with the corresponding FNA cytology reports available.ResultsOf the 294 surgical cases, 162 with a positive or indeterminate cytologic report were selected, reviewed, and classified. Of 52 patients with positive cytologic findings on FNA, 51 (98%) had a final histologic report of a malignant thyroid nodule. Of 110 patients with indeterminate specimens, 30 (27%) had a final histologic diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma. The presence of nuclear atypia was predictive of thyroid carcinoma in 75% of patients, a Hürthle cell cytologic pattern was associated with a malignant thyroid nodule in 33%, and a hypercellular smear was suggestive of malignant involvement in 26% of cases. The lowest rate of malignant potential was associated with cytologic microfollicular and scant colloid alone subtype (6%).ConclusionThe results of this study show that indeterminate thyroid cytologic specimens can be subdivided into groups with different malignant risks. A microfollicular cytologic pattern in the absence of a hypercellular smear or nuclear atypia does not support a recommendation of surgical treatment. A malignant cytologic diagnosis has a high positive predictive value for detection of thyroid cancer. (Endocr Pract. 2004;10:330-334)     

Pre‐operative features of non‐invasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary‐like nuclear features: An analysis of their cytological,Gene Expression Classifier and sonographic findings

Objective

To investigate the corresponding cytological diagnoses, Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) results and ultrasound features of thyroid nodules diagnosed as non‐invasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary‐like nuclear features (NIFTP), as well as any coexisting pathology.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of thyroid nodules histologically diagnosed as NIFTP at our institution between 1^st April 2016 and 1^st April 2017. The following data points were collected: demographics, nodule size, ultrasound features, cytological diagnosis, GEC results, origin of sample (in‐house vs outside hospital) and any additional pathology identified in the resection specimen.

Results

The case cohort included 87 nodules diagnosed as NIFTP (size range: 1‐7 cm, mean: 2.5 cm) from 82 patients (age range: 22‐82, mean age: 50.4, M:F—1:4.1). Corresponding FNA results were available for 72 nodules (82.8%) and were categorised as follows: benign (n = 5, 6.9%), atypia of unknown significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (n = 29, 40.3%), follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm/follicular neoplasm with oncocytic features (n = 27, 37.5%), suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma (n = 6, 8.3%) and malignant (n = 5, 6.9%). GEC results were available for 32 (44.4%) nodules, with the majority of cases classified as suspicious (81.3%). On ultrasound, most of the nodules were predominantly solid (81.8%), vascular (93.8%), non‐calcified (86.5%), and either hypoechoic (44.9%) or isoechoic (38.8%). In addition to NIFTP and other benign findings in the background thyroid, 75 separate malignant tumours were identified in 38 (46.3%) patients, many of which were papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (86.5%) with lymph node metastases present in two cases.

Conclusions

The majority of thyroid nodules histologically diagnosed as NIFTP have indeterminate cytology (77.8%) and are classified as suspicious (81.3%) by GEC testing. Taken together, these findings can guide clinicians toward a more conservative therapeutic approach.

     

Overview of Molecular Biomarkers for Enhancing the Management of Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules and Thyroid Cancer

ObjectiveTo provide information on molecular bio markers that can help assess cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.MethodsPublished studies on immunohistologic, somatic mutation, gene expression classifier, microRNA, and thyrotropin receptor messenger RNA biomarkers are reviewed, and commercially available molecular test pan els are described.ResultsThyroid nodules are common, and clinical guidelines delineate an algorithmic approach including serum thyroid-stimulating hormone measurement, diagnostic ultrasound examination, and, when appropriate, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy for determination of a benign versus malignant status. In clinical practice, approximately 20% of FNA-derived cytology reports are classified as “indeterminate” or follicular nodules that do not fulfill either benign or malignant criteria. In this set ting, the actual risk for malignancy of a cytologically indeterminate nodule ranges from approximately 15% to 34%. Research describing molecular biomarkers from thyroid cancer tissue has been applied to FNA-derived thyroid nodule material. There is also a serum molecular marker that has been reported with goals similar to those for the FNA-derived molecular markers: to enhance the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid cancer and reduce the large number of patients who have a diagnostic surgical procedure for benign thyroid nodules.ConclusionProgress toward the foregoing goals has been made and continues to evolve with the recent appearance of molecular biomarker tests that can be selectively applied for further assessment of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:611-615)     

Do all Thyroid Nodules >4 cm need to be Removed? An Evaluation of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Large Thyroid Nodules

Objective: Controversy exists regarding the ability of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy to rule out malignancy when thyroid nodules exceed 4 cm in diameter. The goal of this study was to provide data regarding FNA accuracy in a clinical setting for detecting/ruling out malignancy in large thyroid nodules (≥4 cm) and discuss FNA utility in guiding surgical decisions.Methods: All thyroid FNA cases performed at Marshfield Clinic from 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2010 followed by complete or partial thyroidectomy on nodules of at least 4 cm were identified. Demographics, medical history, nodule biopsy characteristics, surgical procedures, and diagnosis data were abstracted. FNA was compared to histologic evaluation of surgical specimens.Results: A total of 198 patients with large thyroid nodules were identified. Most had a single large nodule, but ~40% were multinodular, and 206 total nodules were assessed. Females outnumbered males, and the mean age was ~50 years. After surgery, cancer was histologically identified in 49/206 (23.8%) nodules, including 9/123 nodules that had been categorized as benign by FNA, corresponding to a false-negative rate of 7.3%. Sensitivity/specificity for detecting malignancy by FNA was ~80%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was just below 60%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 93% but rose to 96% when papillary microcarcinomas were excluded.Conclusion: While FNA sensitivity in large nodules was relatively low, NPV was high, especially if incidental papillary microcarcinomas were excluded. When cancer prevalence and NPV are known, FNA can be a reliable “rule out” test in nodules ≥4 cm. This information is critical and can help guide the surgery decision, especially in high-risk patients. The decision for surgery should not be solely based on nodule size but should consider additional factors including cancer prevalence, clinical history, ultrasound features, surgical risk, and life expectancy.Abbreviations:FNA = fine-needle aspirationNPV = negative predictive valuePPV = positive predictive value     

Molecular testing of BRAF,RAS and TERT on thyroid FNAs with indeterminate cytology improves diagnostic accuracy

Objective

Liquid‐based (LB)‐FNA is widely recognized as a reliable diagnostic method to evaluate thyroid nodules. However, up to 30% of LB‐FNA remain indeterminate according to the Bethesda system. Use of molecular biomarkers has been recommended to improve its pathological accuracy but implementation of these tests in clinical practice may be difficult. Here, we evaluated feasibility and performance of molecular profiling in routine practice by testing LB‐FNA for BRAF, N/HRAS and TERT mutations.

Methods

We studied a large prospective cohort of 326 cases, including 61 atypia of undetermined significance, 124 follicular neoplasms, 72 suspicious for malignancy and 69 malignant cases. Diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed by histology on paired surgical specimen.

Results

Mutated LB‐FNAs were significantly associated with malignancy regardless of the cytological classification. Overall sensitivity was 60% and specificity 89%. Importantly, in atypia of undetermined significance and follicular neoplasm patients undergoing surgery according to the Bethesda guidelines, negative predictive values were 85.4% and 90% respectively. TERT promoter mutation was rare but very specific for malignancy (5.5%) suggesting that it could be of interest in patients with indeterminate cytology.

Conclusions

Mutation profiling can be successfully performed on thyroid LB‐FNA without any dedicated sample in a pathology laboratory. It is an easy way to improve diagnostic accuracy of routine LB‐FNA and may help to better select patients for surgery and to avoid unnecessary thyroidectomies.

     

Long-Term Nonoperative Rate of Thyroid Nodules with Benign Results on the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier

Objective: The primary objective was to assess the operative rate in patients with a benign result from the Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) during long-term follow-up at nonacademic medical facilities. The secondary endpoint of this study was the treating physician's opinion regarding the safety of GEC use compared to the hypothetical situation of providing thyroid nodule management without the GEC.Methods: This was a retrospective study of nonacademic medical practices utilizing the GEC. Those clinicians utilizing the GEC testing who had three or more ‘benign’ results during the data collection period (September 2010 through June 2014) were invited to participate. Operative status and patient demographics were documented for patients with GEC testing at least 36 months (± 3 months) prior to the date of data collection. A survey also was administered to the treating physicians to assess their perceived safety of using the GEC in patient care.Results: During 36 months (± 3 months) of follow-up, 17 of 98 patients (17.3%) with a ‘benign’ GEC result underwent surgery. Within the first 2 years after a ‘benign’ GEC, 88% of surgeries were performed. Regarding safety of the GEC, the treating physicians reported that patient safety was improved by using the GEC compared to not using the GEC in 78 of 91 cases (86%).Conclusion: It appears that a ‘benign’ result on the GEC is associated with a reduction in the rate of thyroid surgeries compared to published data when patients are followed for 36 months after testing. A nonoperative approach to follow-up was felt to be a safe alternative to diagnostic surgery by the majority of responsible physicians in the study.Abbreviations:AUS = atypia of undetermined significanceFLUS = follicular lesion of undetermined significanceFN = follicular neoplasmFNA = fine-needle aspirationGEC = gene expression classifier     

False-Positive FNA Due to Highly Sensitive BRAF Assay

ObjectiveFalse-positive BRAF analysis on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has rarely been reported in the literature but may become more common with the advent of assays that can detect the BRAF V600E mutation in only 2% of otherwise wild-type thyroid cells. We present the case of an indeterminate BRAF-positive FNA that showed no evidence of cancer on final surgical pathology.MethodsCase report and literature review.ResultsAn 87-year-old female with an indeterminate 1.7-cm nodule but BRAF-positive cytology underwent thyroid lobectomy. Final pathology revealed a benign adenomatoid nodule. An area rich in tumor cells from the nodule was identified, labeled, and microdissected for molecular testing, which demonstrated only wild-type BRAF, at the analytical limit of the assay.ConclusionIncreasingly sensitive BRAF assays using dual-priming oligonucleotide-based multiplex polymerase chain reaction analysis can detect the BRAF V600E mutation when present in only 2% of a population of wild-type cells. This increases the risk of false-positive results, particularly in cases of indeterminate FNA. Clinicians must caution patients in these circumstances that BRAF molecular testing may not have a 100% positive predictive value. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:e8-e10)     

Improving recognition of thyroid carcinoma in rapid-consultation specimens

OBJECTIVE: To improve recognition of thyroid carcinoma in rapid consultation on Diff-Quik-stained (Fisher Diagnostics, Middletown, Virginia, USA.) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and rapid hematoxylin-eosin (H-E)-stained intraoperative scrape preparation (ISP) specimens by assessing 3 variables (anisokaryosis, nuclear overlap [NO] and scant/absent colloid) in cases of cellular follicular lesions (CFL), an indeterminate diagnostic category. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-seven FNAs and 28 ISPs diagnosed as CFL, with histologic follow-up, were evaluated in blinded fashion by 3 cytopathologists assessing the 3 variables. RESULTS: Over 90% of the malignant cases showed NO in both FNA and ISP, while only 22% of the benign cases did; positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were 82% and 100%. All malignant cases showed significant anisokaryosis in both FNA and ISP in contrast to 24% of benign cases; PPV and NPV were 74% and 100%. Scant/absent colloid was seen in 87% and 39% of malignancies in FNA and ISP, respectively, as compared to 55% and 20% of the benign cases. PPV and NPV were 52% and 83% in FNA and 63% and 60% in ISP, respectively. CONCLUSION: Application of these variables improves recognition of thyroid carcinoma, particularly in fine needle aspirates, while additional material may be requested. With ISP, their absence supports recommending against further surgery. Together, optimal surgical planning and outcome may be obtained.     

Posters. P17 Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of thyroid swellings

Introduction Fine needle aspiration cytology is regarded as the gold standard investigation in diagnosis of thyroid swellings. Published data suggest an overall accuracy rate of 75% 1 in the detection of thyroid malignancy. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of FNA cytology in detection of thyroid malignancy in our surgical unit. Methods Between 1989–2002, 144 patients who underwent thyroid resection by single consultant surgeon and who had pre‐operative FNA were enrolled in this retrospective study. The pre‐operative FNA results were compared with definitive histological diagnosis following thyroid resection. Fine needle aspiration cytology was performed using aspirate and non‐aspirate techniques on each thyroid swelling. The cytological sample was assessed by a single cytopathologist and was classified as inadequate, non‐neoplastic, neoplastic, suspicious or indeterminate. The histology was classified as non‐neoplastic (benign) and neoplastic (malignant). Results Fine needle aspiration cytology analysis revealed 94 (13.88%) non‐neoplastic, six (65.27%) neoplastic and 20 (4.16%) suspicious aspirates. Twenty (13.88%) samples were inadequate and four (2.77%) samples were indeterminate. Histological analysis showed 118 (81.94%) benign, 26 (18.05%) malignant specimens. Fine needle aspiration cytology had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of 52.6%, 86.6% and 79.1%, respectively for diagnosing thyroid malignancy. Conclusion The results are comparable with the current published data and demonstrate that FNA cytology in our hands is accurate investigation for pre‐operative diagnosis for the detection of thyroid malignancy.     

BRAF Mutation Testing of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Specimens Enhances the Predictability of Malignancy in Thyroid Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance

Background/Objective: The Bethesda 2007 Thyroid Cytology Classification defines atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) as a heterogeneous category of cases that are neither convincingly benign nor sufficiently atypical for a diagnosis of follicular neoplasm or suspicious for malignancy. At our institution, we refer to these cases as 'indeterminate' and they are further subclassified into two categories. BRAF mutation occurs in 40-60% of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). In this study, we examined cases in the AUS/FLUS category in correlation with BRAF mutation analysis and surgical pathology outcome. Study Design: Thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology specimens interpreted as 'indeterminate' were selected from our files, and available remnants of thin-layer processed specimens were used for BRAF mutation analysis. Surgical pathology reports were reviewed for the final outcomes in these patients. Results: Of the 84 indeterminate cases with BRAF mutation analysis, only 49 had follow-up with surgical intervention. Sixteen cases had BRAF mutation. All of the BRAF-positive cases had a final diagnosis of PTC. Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of BRAF mutation in detecting PTC in FNA specimens with indeterminate diagnosis was 59.3 and 100%, respectively, while the positive and negative predictive values were 100 and 65.6%, respectively. The limited data supports the use of BRAF mutation analysis to predict the risk of malignancy in patients with indeterminate thyroid FNAs.     

Guideline Implementation on Fine-Needle Aspiration for Thyroid Nodules: Focusing on Micronodules

Objective: We investigated patients who were referred to our institution after fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed at outside clinics to evaluate how many nodules satisfied the FNA indications of the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) and compare that to the number of thyroid nodules that satisfy the FNA indications of the American College of Radiology (ACR)-TIRADS and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2018, 2,628 patients were included in our study. The included patients were those referred for thyroid surgery after having a suspicious thyroid nodule. We retrospectively applied the three guidelines to each thyroid nodule and determined whether each nodule satisfied the FNA indications. We compared the proportion of nodules satisfying the FNA indications of each guideline using a generalized linear model and generalized estimating equation.Results: The median size of the 2,628 thyroid nodules was 0.9 cm (range, 0.2 to 9.5 cm). We found that FNA was not indicated for 54.1%, 47.7%, and 19.1% of nodules and 87.3%, 99.0%, and 97.8% among them were micronodules (<1 cm) according to the ACR-TIRADS, ATA guideline, and K-TIRADS, respectively. The proportion of micronodules which satisfied the FNA indications was significantly higher for the K-TIRADS (65.1%) compared to the ACR TIRADS (12.1%) and ATA guideline (12.1%) (P<.001).Conclusion: Among patients referred for thyroid surgery to our institutions, about 35% of the micronodules underwent FNA despite not being appropriate for indications by the K-TIRADS. Systematic training for physicians as well as modifications to increase the sensitivity of the guideline may be needed to reduce the overdiagnosis of thyroid cancers, especially for micronodules.     

Galectin-3 is not useful in thyroid FNA

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have suggested that galectin-3 immunohistochemistry may be useful in the fine needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma as it has been reported to selectively stain carcinomas and not adenomas or goitres. METHODS: Fifty-one patients were included in a prospective study of galectin-3 in thyroid FNA; 88.2% were female and 11.8% male, mean age 53 years, range 25-87 years. Cell blocks were prepared and stained for galectin-3 if any cells were present in needle washings from the respective FNAs. RESULTS: Twelve of 51 (23.5%) of cell blocks contained epithelial cells. One benign and one inadequate FNA were negative for galectin-3 staining. One of five non-diagnostic FNA cases, a papillary carcinoma on final histology showed positive staining. Four follicular neoplasm/suspicious of carcinoma cases showed negative staining. One malignant FNA case, a papillary carcinoma showed positive staining with galectin-3 but three further carcinomas, two papillary and one follicular were galectin-3 negative. CONCLUSION: Galectin-3 immunohistochemistry does not appear to be a useful adjunct to diagnosis in thyroid FNA as it does not reliably distinguish malignant and benign lesions. Many thyroid aspirates are of low cellularity and are not suitable for cell block immunohistochemistry.     

Cytology and mRNA expression analysis of fine needle aspirates of thyroid nodules in an East German region with borderline iodine deficiency.

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is widely recommended as an important tool for pre-operative identification of malignancy in patients with nodular thyroid disease. To assess the diagnostic contribution of FNAC and the potential of quantitative mRNA analysis in fine needle aspirates in daily practice, we conducted a prospective study in thyroid clinics (n=2) and endocrine practices (n=3), respectively in an East German region with borderline iodine deficiency. Two-hundred and forty-four consecutive FNACs were obtained over a period of 2 years (2002-2004) from euthyroid patients presenting for first evaluation of a solitary thyroid nodule. The mean nodule size for FNAC was 27 mm (range: 10-79 mm). In 55% of patients FNAC was performed after scintiscan detection of a cold or normal functioning thyroid nodule (CTN), while in the remainder FNAC was performed as a primary investigation. FNAC outcomes were: 57.8% benign, 22.1% indeterminate, 2.5% suspicious for malignancy, 17.6% non-diagnostic. Messenger RNA levels for a house keeping gene (beta-actin) and a thyroid specific marker (thyroglobulin, Tg) were studied as basic molecular markers using real-time PCR. Both in the IN VIVO and EX VIVO FNA series, beta-actin and Tg mRNA levels were positively correlated with the thyrocyte cell yield/respective FNA smear. However, subgroup analysis showed that FNAC with histologically confirmed follicular thyroid cancer and/or microfollicular adenoma exhibited significantly lower Tg mRNA expression despite high beta-actin levels. Sufficient mRNA quantities were obtained in >90% of FNA specimen to allow quantitative mRNA analysis of at least 5 further genes. In conclusion, quantitative mRNA analysis is feasible in FNA on a routine basis and provides a perspective for a molecular distinction of thyroid nodules, once specific marker genes have been defined for benign and malignant thyroid tumours respectively.