Prostaglandin E prevents indomethacin-induced gastric and intestinal damage through different EP receptor subtypes

Gastrointestinal ulcerogenic effect of indomethacin is causally related with an endogenous prostaglandin (PG) deficiency, yet the detailed mechanism remains unknown. We examined the effect of various PGE analogues specific to EP receptor subtypes on these lesions in rats and mice, and investigated which EP receptor subtype is involved in the protective action of PGE(2). Fasted or non-fasted animals were given indomethacin s.c. at 35 mg/kg for induction of gastric lesions or 10-30 mg/kg for intestinal lesions, and they were killed 4 or 24 h later, respectively. Various EP agonists were given i.v. 10 min before indomethacin. Indomethacin caused hemorrhagic lesions in both the stomach and intestine. Prior administration of 16,16-dimethyl PGE(2) (dmPGE(2)) prevented the development of damage in both tissues, and the effect in the stomach was mimicked by 17-phenyl PGE2 (EP1), while that in the small intestine was reproduced by ONO-NT-012 (EP3) and ONO-AE-329 (EP4). Butaprost (EP2) did not have any effect on either gastric or intestinal lesions induced by indomethacin. Similar to the findings in rats, indomethacin caused gastric and intestinal lesions in both wild-type and knockout mice lacking EP1 or EP3 receptors. However, the protective action of dmPGE(2) in the stomach was observed in wild-type and EP3 receptor knockout mice but not in mice lacking EP1 receptors, while that in the intestine was observed in EP1 knockout as well as wild-type mice but not in the animals lacking EP3 receptors. These results suggest that indomethacin produced damage in the stomach and intestine in a PGE(2)-sensitive manner, and exogenous PGE(2) prevents gastric and intestinal ulcerogenic response to indomethacin through different EP receptor subtypes; the protection in the stomach is mediated by EP1 receptors, while that in the intestine mediated by EP3/EP4 receptors.     

Participation of prostaglandin E receptor EP4 subtype in duodenal bicarbonate secretion in rats

We examined, by using a specific PGE receptor subtype EP4 agonist and antagonist, the involvement of EP4 receptors in duodenal HCO(3)(-) secretion induced by PGE(2) and mucosal acidification in rats. Mucosal acidification was achieved by exposing a duodenal loop to 10 mM HCl for 10 min, and various EP agonists were given intravenously 10 min before the acidification. Secretion of HCO(3)(-) was dose-dependently stimulated by AE1-329 (EP4 agonist), the maximal response being equivalent to that induced by sulprostone (EP1/EP3 agonist) or PGE(2). The stimulatory action of AE1-329 and PGE(2) but not sulprostone was attenuated by AE3-208, a specific EP4 antagonist. This antagonist also significantly mitigated the acid-induced HCO(3)(-) secretion. Coadministration of sulprostone and AE1-329 caused a greater secretory response than either agent alone. IBMX potentiated the stimulatory action of both sulprostone and AE1-329, whereas verapamil mitigated the effect of sulprostone but not AE1-329. Chemical ablation of capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurons did not affect the response to any of the EP agonists used. We conclude that EP4 receptors are involved in the duodenal HCO(3)(-) response induced by PGE(2) or acidification in addition to EP3 receptors. The process by which HCO(3)(-) is secreted through these receptors differs regarding second-messenger coupling. Stimulation through EP4 receptors is mediated by cAMP, whereas that through EP3 receptors is regulated by both cAMP and Ca(2+); yet there is cooperation between the actions mediated by these two receptors. The neuronal reflex pathway is not involved in stimulatory actions of these prostanoids.     

Receptors and pathways mediating the effects of prostaglandin E2 on airway tone

Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) has complex effects on airway tone, and the existence of four PGE(2) [E-prostanoid (EP)] receptors, each with distinct signaling characteristics, has provided a possible explanation for the seemingly contradictory actions of this lipid mediator. To identify the receptors mediating the actions of PGE(2) on bronchomotor tone, we examined its effects on the airways of wild-type and EP receptor-deficient mice. In conscious mice the administration of PGE(2) increased airway responsiveness primarily through the EP1 receptor, although on certain genetic backgrounds a contribution of the EP3 receptor was detected. These effects of PGE(2) were eliminated by pretreatment with either atropine or bupivacaine and were undetectable in anesthetized mice or in denervated tracheal rings, where only EP2-mediated relaxation of airway smooth muscle was observed. Together, our findings are consistent with a model in which PGE(2) modulates airway tone by activating multiple receptors expressed on various cell populations and in which the relative contribution of these receptors might depend on the expression of modifier alleles. PGE(2)/EP1/EP3-induced airway constriction occurs indirectly through activation of neural pathways, whereas PGE(2)-induced bronchodilation results from direct activation of EP2 receptors on airway smooth muscle. This segregation of EP receptor function within the airway suggests that PGE(2) analogs that selectively activate the EP2 receptor without activating the EP1/EP3 receptors might prove useful in the treatment of asthma.     

Prostaglandin E receptor subtypes involved in stimulation of gastroduodenal bicarbonate secretion in rats and mice.

We investigated prostaglandin E (EP) receptor subtypes responsible for the HCO3- stimulatory action of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in the gastroduodental mucosa, by examining the effects of various prostanoids with subtype specific EP receptor agonists in rats and those of PGE2 in knockout mice lacking EP1 or EP3 receptors. In rats, gastric HCO3- secretion was stimulated by i.v. administration of PGE2, 17-phenyl PGE2 the selective EP1 agonist as well as sulprostone the EP1 and EP3 agonist, but was not affected by other EP agonists such as butaprost the selective EP2 agonist, ONO-NT-012 the selective EP3 agonist or 11-deoxy PGE1 the EP3 and EP4 agonist. In contrast, the HCO3- secretion in rat duodenums was stimulated by PGE2, sulprostone, ONO-NT-012 as well as 11-deoxy PGE1 but not affected by either 17-phenyl PGE2 or butaprost. The HCO stimulatory effect of sulprostone in the stomach was significantly inhibited by ONO-AE-829, the selective EP1 antagonist. On the other hand, PGE2 applied topically to the mucosa for 10 min caused a dose-dependent increase of HCO3- secretion in both the stomach and duodenum of wild-type mice. The HCO3- stimulatory action of PGE2 in the stomach was also observed dose-dependently in knockout mice lacking EP3-receptors but was absent in EP1-receptor knockout mice, while the stimulatory effect in the duodenum was observed in EP1-receptor knockout mice, similar to wild-type animals, but not in knockout mice lacking EP3-receptors. These results indicate that PGE2 stimulates HCO3- secretion via different EP receptor subtypes in the stomach and duodenum; the former is mediated by EP1-receptors, while the latter mediated by EP3-receptors.     

Prostaglandin E receptors as inflammatory therapeutic targets for atherosclerosis

Prostaglandin E receptors (EPs) are the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that respond to type E(2) prostaglandin (PGE(2)). Data has shown that PGE(2) may function as an endogenous anti-inflammatory mediator by suppressing the production of cytokines. However, other studies have demonstrated that PGE(2), a pro-inflammatory mediator produced by various cell types within the wounded vascular wall, plays a crucial role in early atherosclerotic development. These contradictory results may be due to the versatility of EPs. Experimental data suggest an individual role for each PGE(2) receptor, such as EP(1), EP(2), EP(3) and EP(4), in atherosclerosis. In this review, the roles of EPs in atherosclerosis are summarized, and the value of EPs as new therapeutic targets for atherosclerosis is explored.     

Prostaglandin receptors: advances in the study of EP3 receptor signaling

Prostaglandin (PG) E(2) produces a broad range of physiological and pharmacological actions in diverse tissues through specific receptors on plasma membranes for maintenance of local homeostasis in the body. PGE receptors are divided into four subtypes, EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4, which have been identified and cloned. These EP receptors are members of the G-protein coupled receptor family. Among these subtypes, the EP3 receptor is unique in its ability to couple to multiple G proteins. EP3 receptor signals are primarily involved in inhibition of adenylyl cyclase via G(i) activation, and in Ca(2+)-mobilization through G(beta)(gamma) from G(i). Along with G(i) activation, the EP3 receptor can stimulate cAMP production via G(s) activation. Recent evidence indicates that the EP3 receptor can augment G(s)-coupled receptor-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity, and can also be coupled to the G(13) protein, resulting in activation of the small G protein Rho followed by morphological changes in neuronal cells. This article focuses on recent studies on the novel pathways of EP3 receptor signaling.     

Functional domains essential for Gs activity in prostaglandin EP2 and EP3 receptors

The interaction of cell surface hormone receptors with heterotrimeric G proteins is crucial for hormonal actions. The domains of the receptor, which interact with and activate G protein, have been extensively studied. However, precise molecular mechanisms underlying regulation of the receptor-induced G protein activation are still poorly understood. Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) receptors comprise of four subtypes, EP1, EP2, EP3 and EP4. Among them, EP2 and EP4 couple to Gs and EP3 to Gi. To assess the functional domains essential for Gs activation in prostanoid receptors, EP2, EP3beta and each intracellular loop- (IC-) interchanged EP2/EP3 chimeras were tested for agonist binding and functional responses. In EP2 receptor, substitution of IC1 or IC3 resulted in loss of binding activity, while substitution of IC2, N- (IC2N) or C-terminal half region of IC2 (IC2C) had no effects on the binding activity. Wild-type EP2 and IC2C-substituted EP2 showed agonist-induced Gs activity, but IC2- and IC2N-substituted EP2 failed to elicit Gs activity upon agonist stimulation. On the other hand, in EP3 receptor substitution of IC1 resulted in loss of PGE(2) binding, while substitution of IC2, IC3, IC2N or IC2C had no effects on binding activity. Wild-type EP3beta, IC3- or IC2C-substituted EP3 failed to show Gs activity upon agonist stimulation, but IC2- or IC2N-substituted EP3 chimera showed agonist-dependent Gs activity. These results indicated that the second intracellular loop of the EP2 plays an essential role in activation of Gs.     

Effects of gestational age on prostaglandin EP receptor expression and functional involvement during in vitro contraction of the guinea pig uterus

Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) exerts diverse biological effects through four G-protein-coupled cell surface receptor subtypes, EP1-4. This study's objective was to characterize EP1-4 receptor mRNA expression within pregnant guinea pig myometrium during early implantation stage (gestation day [GD] 6) and late stage gestation (GD 50) and evaluate in vitro contractile activity of receptor subtype selective agonists. Using RT-PCR, qualitative gene expression patterns of EP2, EP3, and EP4 mRNA were detected in the myometrium and remained unchanged between the gestational ages. EP1 mRNA remained undetected in pregnant tissue. In vitro contractile activity was evaluated in GD 6 and GD 50 myometrium using vehicle and EP agonists PGE(2), 17-phenyl trinor PGE(2), sulprostone, misoprostol, and CP-533,536. All spasmogens in pregnant myometrium were EP1/EP3 selective agonists, though likely acting via EP3 receptors in this test model. CP-533,536--a highly selective EP2 receptor agonist--and the vehicle failed to induce myometrial contraction at both gestational ages.     

Prostaglandin E2 induced functional expression of early growth response factor-1 by EP4, but not EP2, prostanoid receptors via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinases

Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) mediates its physiological effects by interactions with a subfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors known as EP receptors. These receptors consist of four primary subtypes named EP(1), EP(2), EP(3), and EP(4). The EP(2) and EP(4) subtypes are known to couple to Galpha(s) and stimulate intracellular cyclic 3,5- adenosine monophosphate formation, whereas the EP(1) and EP(3) receptors are known to couple to Galpha(q) and Galpha(i), respectively. Recently we found that EP(2) and EP(4) receptors can activate T-cell factor signaling; however, EP(2) receptors did this primarily through a cAMP-dependent protein kinase-dependent pathway, whereas EP(4) receptors primarily utilized a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent pathway (Fujino, H., West, K. A., and Regan, J. W. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 2614-2619). We now report that PGE(2) stimulation of EP(4) receptors, but not EP(2) receptors, leads to phosphorylation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) through a PI3K-dependent mechanism. Furthermore, this activation of PI3K/ERK signaling by the EP(4) receptors induces the functional expression of early growth response factor-1 (EGR-1). Under the same conditions induction of EGR-1 protein expression was not observed following PGE(2) stimulation of EP(2) receptors. These findings point to important differences in the signaling potential of the EP(2) and EP(4) receptors, which could be significant with respect to the potential involvement of EP(4) receptors in inflammation and cancer.     

Microglial expression of prostaglandin EP3 receptor in excitotoxic lesions in the rat striatum

Prostaglandins (PG) are produced by the enzymatic activity of cyclooxygenase (COX). PGs and COX have been implicated in the pathophysiology of excitotoxicity and neurodegeneration in the central nervous system (CNS). The PGE2 receptor EP3 is the most abundantly expressed PGE2 receptor subtype in the brain. So far, in the innate rat brain EP3 receptors have been found exclusively in neurons. The aim of this study was to investigate whether EP3 expression in the brain changes under neurodegenerative circumstances such as an acute excitotoxic lesion. Intrastriatal injection of quinolinic acid (QUIN) resulted in a loss of EP3-positive striatal neurons, while simultaneously small glial-shaped EP3-positive cells appeared. Five days after lesioning, 63% of the glial-shaped EP3-positive cells could be identified as ED-1 expressing microglial cells. This percentage increased to 82% after 10 days, suggesting that most of the EP3-positive ED-1-negative cells on day 5 may be microglia which did not yet express ED-1. ED-1-positive microglia also expressed COX-1. These experiments show for the first time that activated microglial cells in excitotoxic lesions express in vivo the PGE2 receptor EP3 and the PGE2 synthesizing enzyme COX-1. Activation of EP3 receptor downregulates cAMP formation and may counteract the upregulation of cAMP formation via EP2 receptors, which has been linked to the anti-inflammatory effects of PGs. This change in EP3-receptor expression in microglia might participate in acute or chronic microglial activation in a variety of brain diseases such as ischemia or Alzheimer's disease (AD). Investigation of the expression of different PGE2 receptor subtypes might promote a better understanding of the pathophysiology of these diseases as well as leading to a modulation of microglial activation by a more specific interference with selective EP receptors than can be achieved by inhibiting global PG synthesis by selective or non-selective COX inhibitors.     

Role of prostaglandin E2 receptors in migration of murine and human breast cancer cells

Aberrant upregulation of COX-2 enzyme resulting in accumulation of PGE2 in a cancer cell environment is a marker for progression of many cancers, including breast cancer. Four subtypes of cell surface receptors (EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4), which are coupled with different G-proteins, mediate PGE2 actions. Since migration is an essential step in invasion and metastasis, in the present study we defined the expression of EP receptors and their roles in migratory function of breast cancer cells of murine (C3L5) and human (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7) origin. Highly metastatic C3L5 and MDA-MB-231 cells, found to be highly migratory in a Transwell migration assay, were shown to accumulate much higher levels of PGE2 in culture media in comparison with nonmetastatic and poorly migrating MCF-7 cells; the levels of PGF2alpha and 6-keto-PGF1alpha were low in all cases. The elevated PGE2 production by metastatic cancer cells was due to COX-2 activity since dual COX-1/2 inhibitor indomethacin and selective COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 equally suppressed both basal and inducible (by IFN-gamma/LPS or Ca2+-ionophores) PGE2 accumulation. RT-PCR analysis revealed that murine C3L5 cells expressed mRNA of EP1, EP3, and EP4 but not EP2 receptors. On the other hand, human MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells expressed all the above receptors. High levels of expression of functional EP4 receptors coupled with Gs-protein was confirmed in C3L5 cells by biochemical assay showing a dose-dependent increase of intracellular cAMP synthesis in response to PGE2. EP receptor antagonists SC-19220, AH-6809, and AH-23848B, having highest affinity for EP1, EP1/EP2/DP, and EP4 receptors, respectively, variably inhibited migration of metastatic breast cancer cells. An autocrine PGE2-mediated migratory activity of these cells appeared to be associated predominantly with EP4 receptor-mediated signaling pathway, which uses cAMP as a second messenger. This conclusion is based on several observations: (1) selective EP4 antagonist AH-23848B effectively inhibited migration of both C3L5 and MDA-MB-231 cells in a dose-dependent manner; (2) exogenous PGE2 and EP4 agonist PGE1 alcohol increased migration of C3L5 cells; (3) forskolin, a potent activator of adenylate cyclase, as well as membrane-permeable analogues of cAMP (8-bromo-cAMP, dibutyryl-cAMP) stimulated migration of C3L5 cells; and (4) Rp-cAMPS, a selective protein kinase A inhibitor, reduced migration of C3L5 cells. Migration of poorly migratory MCF-7 cells remained unaffected with either PGE2 or EP4 antagonist. These findings are relevant for designing therapeutic strategies against breast cancer metastasis.     

In vivo intra-luteal implants of prostaglandin (PG) E1 or E2 (PGE1, PGE2) prevent luteolysis in cows. II: mRNA for PGF2α, EP1, EP2, EP3 (A-D), EP3A, EP3B, EP3C, EP3D, and EP4 prostanoid receptors in luteal tissue

Previously, it was reported that chronic intra-uterine infusion of PGE(1) or PGE(2) every 4h inhibited luteolysis in ewes by altering luteal mRNA for luteinizing hormone (LH) receptors and unoccupied and occupied luteal LH receptors. However, estradiol-17β or PGE(2) given intra-uterine every 8h did not inhibit luteolysis in cows, but infusion of estradiol+PGE(2) inhibited luteolysis. In contrast, intra-luteal implants containing PGE(1) or PGE(2) in Angus or Brahman cows also inhibited the decline in circulating progesterone, mRNA for LH receptors, and loss of unoccupied and occupied receptors for LH to prevent luteolysis. The objective of this experiment was to determine how intra-luteal implants of PGE(1) or PGE(2) alter mRNA for prostanoid receptors and how this could influence luteolysis in Brahman or Angus cows. On day-13 Angus cows received no intra-luteal implant and corpora lutea were retrieved or Angus and Brahman cows received intra-luteal silastic implants containing Vehicle, PGE(1), or PGE(2) and corpora lutea were retrieved on day-19. Corpora lutea slices were analyzed for mRNA for prostanoid receptors (FP, EP1, EP2, EP3 (A-D), EP3A, EP3B, EP3C, EP3D, and EP4) by RT-PCR. Day-13 Angus cow luteal tissue served as pre-luteolytic controls. mRNA for FP receptors decreased in day-19 Vehicle controls compared to day-13 Vehicle controls regardless of breed. PGE(1) and PGE(2) up-regulated FP gene expression on day-19 compared to day-19 Vehicle controls regardless of breed. EP1 mRNA was not altered by any treatment. PGE(1) and PGE(2) down-regulated EP2 and EP4 mRNA compared to day-19 Vehicle controls regardless of breed. PGE(1) or PGE(2) up-regulated mRNA EP3B receptor subtype compared to day-19 Vehicle control cows regardless of breed. The similarities in relative gene expression profiles induced by PGE(1) and PGE(2) support their agonistic effects. We conclude that both PGE(1) and PGE(2) may prevent luteolysis by altering expression of mRNA for prostanoid receptors, which is correlated with changes in luteal mRNA for LH receptors reported previously in these same cows to prevent luteolysis.     

Role of EP(2) and EP(3) PGE(2) receptors in control of murine renal hemodynamics

The kidney plays a central role in long-term regulation of arterial blood pressure and salt and water homeostasis. This is achieved in part by the local actions of paracrine and autacoid mediators such as the arachidonic acid-prostanoid system. The present study tested the role of specific PGE(2) E-prostanoid (EP) receptors in the regulation of renal hemodynamics and vascular reactivity to PGE(2). Specifically, we determined the extent to which the EP(2) and EP(3) receptor subtypes mediate the actions of PGE(2) on renal vascular tone. Renal blood flow (RBF) was measured by ultrasonic flowmetry, whereas vasoactive agents were injected directly into the renal artery of male mice. Studies were performed on two independent mouse lines lacking either EP(2) or EP(3) (-/-) receptors and the results were compared with wild-type controls (+/+). Our results do not support a unique role of the EP(2) receptor in regulating overall renal hemodynamics. Baseline renal hemodynamics in EP(2)-/- mice [RBF EP(2)-/-: 5.3 +/- 0.8 ml. min(-1). 100 g kidney wt(-1); renal vascular resistance (RVR) 19.7 +/- 3.6 mmHg. ml(-1). min. g kidney wt] did not differ statistically from control mice (RBF +/+: 4.0 +/- 0.5 ml. min(-1). 100 g kidney wt(-1); RVR +/+: 25.4 +/- 4.9 mmHg. ml(-1). min. 100 g kidney wt(-1)). This was also the case for the peak RBF increase after local PGE(2) (500 ng) injection into the renal artery (EP(2)-/-: 116 +/- 4 vs. +/+: 112 +/- 2% baseline RBF). In contrast, we found that the absence of EP(3) receptors in EP(3)-/- mice caused a significant increase (43%) in basal RBF (7.9 +/- 0.8 ml. min(-1). g kidney wt(-1), P < 0.05 vs. +/+) and a significant decrease (41%) in resting RVR (11.6 +/- 1.4 mmHg. ml(-1). min. g kidney wt(-1), P < 0.05 vs. +/+). Local administration of 500 ng of PGE(2) into the renal artery caused more pronounced renal vasodilation in EP(3)-/- mice (128 +/- 2% of basal RBF, P < 0.05 vs. +/+). We conclude that EP(3 )receptors mediate vasoconstriction in the kidney of male mice and its actions are tonically active in the basal state. Furthermore, EP(3) receptors are capable of buffering PGE(2)-mediated renal vasodilation.     

Differential mRNA expression of prostaglandin receptor subtypes in macrophage activation

Assessing the regulation of macrophage receptors for prostaglandin (PGE2) is essential to understanding the control which that potent lipid mediator has in modulating macrophage activities. The purpose of this study was to assess the differential mRNA expression of PGE2 receptor subtypes (EP) during macrophage exposure to activating and transducing agents. RAW 264.7 macrophages constitutively expressed mRNA for EP2,EP3 and EP4 receptor subtypes. Messenger RNA for EP4 was expressed at a much higher level when compared to EP2 in unstimulated macrophages as assessed by kinetic quantitative RT-PCR. When macrophages were stimulated with LPS, EP2 m RNA levels were 12-fold higher when compared to unstimulated macrophages, while EP4 m RNA remained unchanged. Conversely, mRNA levels of both EP2 and EP4 receptors were lower after macrophages were treated with IFN-gamma. Messenger RNA levels of both receptors were lower in macrophages after treatment with PGE2 or dibutyryl (db) cAMP Addition of the PKA inhibitor H89 reversed the effects of PGE2 and dbcAMP to varying degrees. Proteosome and p38 MAP kinase inhibitors blocked the LPS-stimulated increase in EP2 mRNA levels. Those inhibitors had no effect on EP4 mRNA.Thus, activating agents such as LPS and IFN-gamma may differentially regulate mRNAfor PGE2 receptor types in macrophages but the ligand and its associated signal transducing factors probably have similar regulatory effects.     

PGE1 and PGE2 modify platelet function through different prostanoid receptors

There is evidence that the overall effects of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) on human platelet function are the consequence of a balance between promotory effects of PGE(2) acting at the EP3 receptor and inhibitory effects acting at the EP4 receptor, with no role for the IP receptor. Another prostaglandin that has been reported to affect platelet function is prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)), however the receptors that mediate its actions on platelet function have not been fully defined. Here we have used measurements of platelet aggregation and P-selectin expression induced by the thromboxane A(2) mimetic U46619 to compare the effects of PGE(1) and PGE(2) on platelet function. Their effects on vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation, as a marker of cAMP, were also determined. We also investigated the ability of the selective prostanoid receptor antagonists CAY10441 (IP antagonist), DG-041 (EP3 antagonist) and ONO-AE3-208 (EP4 antagonist) to modify the effects of the prostaglandins on platelet function. The results obtained confirm that PGE(2) interacts with EP3 and EP4 receptors, but not IP receptors. In contrast PGE(1) interacts with EP3 and IP receptors, but not EP4 receptors. In both cases the overall effects on platelet function reflect the balance between promotory and inhibitory effects at receptors that have opposite effects on adenylate cyclase.     

In vitro pharmacological characterization of CJ-042794, a novel, potent, and selective prostaglandin EP(4) receptor antagonist

Activation of the prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) EP(4) receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), results in increases in intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels via stimulation of adenylate cyclase. Here we describe the in vitro pharmacological characterization of a novel EP(4) receptor antagonist, CJ-042794 (4-{(1S)-1-[({5-chloro-2-[(4-fluorophenyl)oxy]phenyl}carbonyl)amino]ethyl}benzoic acid). CJ-042794 inhibited [(3)H]-PGE(2) binding to the human EP(4) receptor with a mean pK(i) of 8.5, a binding affinity that was at least 200-fold more selective for the human EP(4) receptor than other human EP receptor subtypes (EP(1), EP(2), and EP(3)). CJ-042794 did not exhibit any remarkable binding to 65 additional proteins, including GPCRs, enzymes, and ion channels, suggesting that CJ-042794 is highly selective for the EP(4) receptor. CJ-042794 competitively inhibited PGE(2)-evoked elevations of intracellular cAMP levels in HEK293 cells overexpressing human EP(4) receptor with a mean pA(2) value of 8.6. PGE(2) inhibited the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced production of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) in human whole blood (HWB); CJ-042794 reversed the inhibitory effects of PGE(2) on LPS-induced TNFalpha production in a concentration-dependent manner. These results suggest that CJ-042794, a novel, potent, and selective EP(4) receptor antagonist, has excellent pharmacological properties that make it a useful tool for exploring the physiological role of EP(4) receptors.     

Characterization of PGE2 receptors in fetal and newborn lamb ductus arteriosus

Although the role of PGE2 in maintaining ductus arteriosus (DA) patency is well established, the specific PGE2 receptor subtype(s) (EP) involved have not been clearly identified. We used late gestation fetal and neonatal lambs to study developmental regulation of EP receptors. In the fetal DA, radioligand binding and RT-PCR assays virtually failed to detect EP1 but detected EP2, EP3D, and EP4 receptors in equivalent proportions. In the newborn lamb, DA total density was one-third of that found in the fetus and only EP2 was detected. Stimulation of EP2 and EP4 increased cAMP formation and was associated with DA relaxation. Though stimulation of EP3 inhibited cAMP formation, it surprisingly relaxed the fetal DA both in vitro and in vivo. This EP3-induced relaxation was specifically diminished by the ATP-sensitive K(+) (K(ATP)) channel blocker glibenclamide. In conclusion, PGE2 dilates the late gestation fetal DA through pathways that involve either cAMP (EP2 and EP4) or K(ATP) channels (EP3). The loss of EP3 and EP4 receptors in the newborn DA is consistent with its decreased responsiveness to PGE2.