Argonaute Proteins and Mechanisms of RNA Interference in Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes

Noncoding RNAs play essential roles in genetic regulation in all organisms. In eukaryotic cells, many small non-coding RNAs act in complex with Argonaute proteins and regulate gene expression by recognizing complementary RNA targets. The complexes of Argonaute proteins with small RNAs also play a key role in silencing of mobile genetic elements and, in some cases, viruses. These processes are collectively called RNA interference. RNA interference is a powerful tool for specific gene silencing in both basic research and therapeutic applications. Argonaute proteins are also found in prokaryotic organisms. Recent studies have shown that prokaryotic Argonautes can also cleave their target nucleic acids, in particular DNA. This activity of prokaryotic Argonautes might potentially be used to edit eukaryotic genomes. However, the molecular mechanisms of small nucleic acid biogenesis and the functions of Argonaute proteins, in particular in bacteria and archaea, remain largely unknown. Here we briefly review available data on the RNA interference processes and Argonaute proteins in eukaryotes and prokaryotes.     

Evolutionary Constraints of Phosphorylation in Eukaryotes,Prokaryotes, and Mitochondria

High accuracy mass spectrometry has proven to be a powerful technology for the large scale identification of serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphorylation in the living cell. However, despite many described phosphoproteomes, there has been no comparative study of the extent of phosphorylation and its evolutionary conservation in all domains of life. Here we analyze the results of phosphoproteomics studies performed with the same technology in a diverse set of organisms. For the most ancient organisms, the prokaryotes, only a few hundred proteins have been found to be phosphorylated. Applying the same technology to eukaryotic species resulted in the detection of thousands of phosphorylation events. Evolutionary analysis shows that prokaryotic phosphoproteins are preferentially conserved in all living organisms, whereas-site specific phosphorylation is not. Eukaryotic phosphosites are generally more conserved than their non-phosphorylated counterparts (with similar structural constraints) throughout the eukaryotic domain. Yeast and Caenorhabditis elegans are two exceptions, indicating that the majority of phosphorylation events evolved after the divergence of higher eukaryotes from yeast and reflecting the unusually large number of nematode-specific kinases. Mitochondria present an interesting intermediate link between the prokaryotic and eukaryotic domains. Applying the same technology to this organelle yielded 174 phosphorylation sites mapped to 74 proteins. Thus, the mitochondrial phosphoproteome is similarly sparse as the prokaryotic phosphoproteomes. As expected from the endosymbiotic theory, phosphorylated as well as non-phosphorylated mitochondrial proteins are significantly conserved in prokaryotes. However, mitochondrial phosphorylation sites are not conserved throughout prokaryotes, consistent with the notion that serine/threonine phosphorylation in prokaryotes occurred relatively recently in evolution. Thus, the phosphoproteome reflects major events in the evolution of life.Reversible protein phosphorylation on serines, threonines, and tyrosines plays a crucial role in regulating processes in all living organisms ranging from prokaryotes to eukaryotes (1). Traditionally, phosphorylation has been detected in single, purified proteins using in vitro assays. Recent advances in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics now allow the identification of in vivo phosphorylation sites with high accuracy (2–7). On-line databases such as PhosphoSite (8), Phospho.ELM (9), and PHOSIDA1 (10) have collected and organized thousands of identified phosphosites. These databases as well as dedicated analysis environments such as NetworKIN (11, 12) offer and use contextual information including structural features, potential kinases, and conservation. They constitute resources that should allow the derivation of general patterns for phosphorylation events. Specifically, the recent availability of data for archaeal, prokaryotic, and diverse eukaryotic phosphoproteomes in these databases should enable investigation of the evolutionary history of this post-translational modification.Prokaryotes have two separate classes of phosphorylation events. Apart from the canonical histidine/aspartate phosphorylation, which has been studied for decades, serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphorylation is also present and has recently become amenable to analysis by MS (13). Bacterial phosphoproteins are involved in protein synthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system. Recent phosphoproteomics studies of Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Lactococcus lactis described around 100 phosphorylation sites on serine, threonine, and tyrosine in each of these species (13–15). Bacterial phosphorylation sites can change in response to environmental conditions (16).Interestingly, even archaea have serine/threonine and tyrosine phosphorylation. A recent study of Halobacterium salinarum described 75 serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphorylation sites on 62 proteins involved in a wide range of cellular processes including a variety of metabolic pathways (17).Although only a few hundred phosphorylation events have been found in prokaryotic species, similar experimental conditions and effort have yielded the detection of thousands of phosphorylation events in eukaryotes ranging from yeast to human (7, 18–21). Before the advent of large scale phosphoproteomics, serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphorylation has been estimated to affect one-third of all proteins (22). Recent large scale phosphoproteomics studies now suggest that more than half of all eukaryotic proteins are phosphorylated (23).A key event in evolution was the endosymbiosis of prokaryotes that enabled the development of a much more complex type of life, the eukaryotic cell. Analyses of mitochondrial genes suggest that the α-proteobacterium Rickettsia prowazekii is the endosymbiotic precursor leading to modern mitochondria (24). Almost all of the mitochondrial genes have migrated to the nuclear genome during subsequent evolution, and it is predicted that 10–15% of eukaryotic nuclear genes of organisms encode mitochondrial proteins (25).Thus, mitochondria with their unique evolutionary position between prokaryotes and eukaryotes form an interesting link for the evolutionary analysis of phosphorylation. Several studies investigated the mitochondrial phosphoproteome in different organisms using gel electrophoresis or specific enrichment methods coupled with mass spectrometry (26–28). Those studies established potential mitochondrial phosphoproteins. Three large scale studies based on affinity enrichment of phosphopeptides and mass spectrometry obtained direct experimental evidence of phosphorylation sites in mitochondria. Lee et al. (29) used a combination of different peptide enrichment strategies and found 80 phosphorylation sites of 48 different proteins from mouse liver. Very recently, a study by Deng et al. (30) characterized the murine cardiac mitochondrial mouse phosphoproteome, covering 236 phosphosites on 181 proteins. Investigating yeast, Reinders et al. (31) assigned 84 phosphorylation sites in 62 proteins.To enable comparative analysis of phosphoproteomes between all domains of life and mitochondria, here we experimentally determined a high accuracy mitochondrial mouse phosphoproteome based on technology conditions similar to those applied to the identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic phosphoproteomes. We then performed a detailed evolutionary study of the conservation of the identified phosphoproteins and phosphorylation sites in prokaryotes and in eukaryotes. This allowed an initial comparison of the phosphoproteomes of prokaryotes, mitochondria, and eukaryotes.     

Cytokinesis in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes: Common Principles and Different Solutions

Cytokinesis requires duplication of cellular structures followed by bipolarization of the predivisional cell. As a common principle, this applies to prokaryotes as well as eukaryotes. With respect to eukaryotes, the discussion has focused mainly on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and on Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Escherichia coli and to a lesser extent Bacillus subtilis have been used as prokaryotic examples. To establish a bipolar cell, duplication of a eukaryotic origin of DNA replication as well as its genome is not sufficient. Duplication of the microtubule-organizing center is required as a prelude to mitosis, and it is here that the dynamic cytoskeleton with all its associated proteins comes to the fore. In prokaryotes, a cytoskeleton that pervades the cytoplasm appears to be absent. DNA replication and the concomitant DNA segregation seem to occur without help from extensive cytosolic supramacromolecular assemblies but with help from the elongating cellular envelope. Prokaryotic cytokinesis proceeds through a contracting ring, which has a roughly 100-fold-smaller circumference than its eukaryotic counterpart. Although the ring contains proteins that can be considered as predecessors of actin, tubulin, and microtubule-associated proteins, its macromolecular composition is essentially different.     

Glutathione Synthetase of Aspergillus niger: Structural Properties of the Enzyme in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes

Glutathione synthetase isolated from a mold, Aspergillus niger, had a molecular weight of 110,000 and consisted of two apparently identical subunits, each with a molecular weight of 55,000. The enzyme was most active at pH 8.5. It specifically utilized glycine and ATP, and required Mg^{2 +} or Mn^{2 +} for its catalytic function. A comparison of glutathione synthetases from various sources indicated that the enzyme of eukaryotes (mammals, molds and yeasts) differ from those of prokaryotes {Escherichia coli B and Proteus mirabilis) in molecular structure, although the enzymes from both types of organisms contain an active site thiol and catalyze the same reaction.     

Systematic Proteomic Analysis of Protein Methylation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes Revealed Distinct Substrate Specificity

The studies of protein methylation mainly focus on lysine and arginine residues due to their diverse roles in essential cellular processes from gene expression to signal transduction. Nevertheless, atypical protein methylation occurring on amino acid residues, such as glutamine and glutamic acid, is largely neglected until recently. In addition, the systematic analysis for the distribution of methylation on different amino acids in various species is still lacking, which hinders our understanding of its functional roles. In this study, we deeply explored the methylated sites in three species Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and HeLa cells by employing MS‐based proteomic approach coupled with heavy methyl SILAC method. We identify a total of 234 methylated sites on 187 proteins with high localization confidence, including 94 unreported methylated sites on nine different amino acid residues. KEGG and gene ontology analysis show the pathways enriched with methylated proteins are mainly involved in central metabolism for E. coli and S. cerevisiae, but related to spliceosome for HeLa cells. The analysis of methylation preference on different amino acids is conducted in three species. Protein N‐terminal methylation is dominant in E. coli while methylated lysines and arginines are widely identified in S. cerevisiae and HeLa cells, respectively. To study whether some atypical protein methylation has biological relevance in the pathological process in mammalian cells, we focus on histone methylation in diet‐induced obese (DIO) mouse. Two glutamate methylation sites showed statistical significance in DIO mice compared with chow‐fed mice, suggesting their potential roles in diabetes and obesity. Together, these findings expanded the methylome database from microbes to mammals, which will benefit our further appreciation for the protein methylation as well as its possible functions on disease.     

真核细胞中mRNA的降解机制

细胞中不同的ｍ ＲＮＡ 半寿期差异很大,ｍ ＲＮＡ 的稳定性受到多种因素的影响,现在已经发现了许多对ｍ ＲＮＡ 的稳定性有影响的顺式因子和反式因子。大量的研究证明在真核细胞内存在复杂的机制调节ｍ ＲＮＡ 的稳定与降解及其所引起的基因表达。现在可以肯定在真核细胞中至少存在着三种ｍ ＲＮＡ的降解方式：依赖于脱腺苷酸的降解,无义密码介导的ｍ ＲＮＡ 的降解和核酸内切酶的水解。其中依赖于脱腺苷酸的降解方式是细胞内大多数ｍ ＲＮＡ 降解的主要途径。     

Universal Temporal Profile of Replication Origin Activation in Eukaryotes

Although replication proteins are conserved among eukaryotes, the sequence requirements for replication initiation differ between species. In all species, however, replication origins fire asynchronously throughout S phase. The temporal program of origin firing is reproducible in cell populations but largely probabilistic at the single-cell level. The mechanisms and the significance of this program are unclear. Replication timing has been correlated with gene activity in metazoans but not in yeast. One potential role for a temporal regulation of origin firing is to minimize fluctuations in replication end time and avoid persistence of unreplicated DNA in mitosis. Here, we have extracted the population-averaged temporal profiles of replication initiation rates for S. cerevisiae, S. pombe, D. melanogaster, X. laevis and H. sapiens from genome-wide replication timing and DNA combing data. All the profiles have a strikingly similar shape, increasing during the first half of S phase then decreasing before its end. A previously proposed minimal model of stochastic initiation modulated by accumulation of a recyclable, limiting replication-fork factor and fork-promoted initiation of new origins, quantitatively described the observed profiles without requiring new implementations.The selective pressure for timely completion of genome replication and optimal usage of replication proteins that must be imported into the cell nucleus can explain the generic shape of the profiles. We have identified a universal behavior of eukaryotic replication initiation that transcends the mechanisms of origin specification. The population-averaged efficiency of replication origin usage changes during S phase in a strikingly similar manner in a highly diverse set of eukaryotes. The quantitative model previously proposed for origin activation in X. laevis can be generalized to explain this evolutionary conservation.     

真核细胞中mRNA的降解机制

细胞中不同的mRNA半寿期差异很大,mRNA的稳定性受到多种因素的影响,现在已经发现了许多对mRNA的稳定性有影响的顺式因子和反式因子。大量的研究证明在真核细胞内存在复杂的机制调节mRNA的稳定与降解及其所引起的基因表达。现在可以肯定在真核细胞中至少存在着三种mRNA的降解方式：依赖于脱腺苷酸的降解,无义密码介导的mRNA的降解和核酸内切酶的水解。其中依赖于脱腺苷酸的降解方式是细胞内大多数mRNA降解的主要途径。 Abstract　The half-lives of different mRNAs in Eukaryotic cells vary greatly. There are many elements can influence mRNA stability, including cis-acting factors and trans-acting factors. Evidences show that there exist complicated mechanisms in cells that regulate mRNA stability, degradation and expression. Recent results have defined three mRNA degradation pathways in Eukaryotic cells: deadenylation-dependent mRNA decay, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and endonuclolytic cleavage. Among these pathways deadenylation-dependent decay is the most general pathway.     

Reduced stability of mRNA secondary structure near the translation-initiation site in dsDNA viruses

Background  

Recent studies have demonstrated a selection pressure for reduced mRNA secondary-structure stability near the start codon of coding sequences. This selection pressure can be observed in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, and is likely caused by the requirement of efficient translation initiation in cellular organism.     

Review: SMCs in the World of Chromosome Biology— From Prokaryotes to Higher Eukaryotes

The study of higher order chromosome structure and how it is modified through the course of the cell cycle has fascinated geneticists, biochemists, and cell biologists for decades. The results from many diverse technical avenues have converged in the discovery of a large superfamily of chromosome-associated proteins known as SMCs, for structural maintenance of chromosomes, which are predicted to have ATPase activity. Now found in all eukaryotes examined, and numerous prokaryotes as well, SMCs play crucial roles in chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, sex chromosome dosage compensation, and DNA recombination repair. In eukaryotes, SMCs exist in five subfamilies, which appear to associate with one another in particular pairs to perform their specific functions. In this review, we summarize current progress examining the roles these proteins, and the complexes they form, play in chromosome metabolism. We also present a twist in the SMC story, with the possibility of one SMC moonlighting in an unpredicted location.     

Phylogenetic and Comparative Sequence Analysis of Thermostable Alpha Amylases of kingdom Archea,Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes

Alpha amylase family is generally defined as a group of enzymes that can hydrolyse and transglycosylase α-(1, 4) or α-(1, 6) glycosidic bonds along with the preservation of anomeric configuration. For the comparative analysis of alpha amylase family, nucleotide sequences of seven thermo stable organisms of Kingdom Archea i.e. Pyrococcus furiosus (100-105°C), Kingdom Prokaryotes i.e. Bacillus licheniformis (90-95°C), Geobacillus stearothermophilus (75°C), Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (72°C), Bacillus subtilis (70°C) and Bacillus KSM K38 (55°C) and Eukaryotes i.e. Aspergillus oryzae (60°C) were selected from NCBI. Primary structure composition analysis and Conserved sequence analysis were conducted through Bio Edit tools. Results from BioEdit shown only three conserved regions of base pairs and least similarity in MSA of the above mentioned alpha amylases. In Mega 5.1 Phylogeny of thermo stable alpha amylases of Kingdom Archea, Prokaryotes and Eukaryote was handled by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) algorithm. Mega 5.1 phylogenetic results suggested that alpha amylases of thermo stable organisms i.e. Pyrococcus furiosus (100-105°C), Bacillus licheniformis (90-95°C), Geobacillus stearothermophilus (75°C) and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (72°C) are more distantly related as compared to less thermo stable organisms. By keeping in mind the characteristics of most thermo stable alpha amylases novel and improved features can be introduced in less thermo stable alpha amylases so that they become more thermo tolerant and productive for industry.     

Prototypic SNARE Proteins Are Encoded in the Genomes of Heimdallarchaeota,Potentially Bridging the Gap between the Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes

1. Download : Download high-res image (134KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

真核生物mRNA的帽结构与帽结合蛋白

帽结构是所有ＲＮＡ 聚合酶Ⅱ转录产物的特征性结构,它在ｍ ＲＮＡ 的功能和代谢的很多方面起作用． 在这些过程中还离不开相关蛋白质对它的识别和粘附,作为它行使功能的媒介,这些蛋白质就称为帽结合蛋白（Ｃａｐ－Ｂｉｎｄｉｎｇ Ｐｒｏｔｅｉｎ,ＣＢＰ）． 该文主要讨论了帽结构与胞质中的ＣＢＰ－ｅＩＦ４Ｅ（ｅｕｋａｒｙｏｔｉｃ ｉｎｉｔｉａｔｉｏｎ ｆａｃｔｏｒ ４Ｅ,真核起始因子４Ｅ）的相互作用在ｍ ＲＮＡ 指导的翻译起始中的作用机制,以及帽结构与核内发现的另一种ＣＢＰ复合体相互作用在ｍ ＲＮＡ 加工中的作用．     

真核生物mRNA的帽结构与由结合蛋白

帽结构是所有ＲＮＡ聚合酶Ⅱ转录产物的特征性结构,它在ｍＲＮＡ的功能和代谢的很多方面起作用。在这些过程中还离不开相关蛋白质对它的识别和粘附,作为它行使功能的媒介,这些蛋白南就称为帽结合蛋白（Ｃａｐ－Ｂｉｎｄｉｎｇ Ｐｒｏｔｅｉｎ,ＣＢＰ）。该文主要讨论了帽结构与胞质中的ＣＢＰ－ｅＩＦ４Ｅ（ｅｕｋａｒｙｏｔｉｃ ｉｎｉｔｉａｔｉｏｎ ｆａｃｔｏｒ ４Ｅ,真核核起始因子４Ｅ）的相互作用在ｍＲＢＮＡ指导的     

Translation-Initiation Promoting Site on Transcripts of Highly Expressed Genes From Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the Role of Hairpin Stems to Position the Site Near the Initiation Codon

Abstract

It is reported that the AUG-upstream region on mRNAs of highly expressed genes from S. cerevisiae invariably possesses a translation-initiation promoting site, that can base pair with a well-conserved site on 18S rRNA during the formation of 40S initiation complex. Weak hairpin stem in the mRNA region between such a site and the initiation codon brings the site nearer to the initiation codon and also extends the length of base pairing. Such a base pairing can lead to a comparatively more stable 40S initiation complex, resulting in a higher rate of formation of the 80S initiation complex and consequently in an enhancement of the rate of initiation of translation. The site on 18S rRNA can interchange its base pairing between the site on mRNA and a well-conserved site on 25S rRNA in the formation of the 80S initiation complex.     

dbSWEET: An Integrated Resource for SWEET Superfamily to Understand,Analyze and Predict the Function of Sugar Transporters in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes

SWEET (Sweet Will Eventually be Exported Transporter) proteins have been recently discovered and form one of the three major families of sugar transporters. Homologs of SWEET are found in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Bacterial SWEET homologs have three transmembrane segments forming a triple-helical bundle and the functional form is dimers. Eukaryotic SWEETs have seven transmembrane helical segments forming two triple-helical bundles with a linker helix. Members of SWEET homologs have been shown to be involved in several important physiological processes in plants. However, not much is known regarding the biological significance of SWEET homologs in prokaryotes and in mammals. We have collected more than 2000 SWEET homologs from both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. For each homolog, we have modeled three different conformational states representing outward open, inward open and occluded states. We have provided details regarding substrate-interacting residues and residues forming the selectivity filter for each SWEET homolog. Several search and analysis options are available. The users can generate a phylogenetic tree and structure-based sequence alignment for selected set of sequences. With no metazoan SWEETs functionally characterized, the features observed in the selectivity filter residues can be used to predict the potential substrates that are likely to be transported across the metazoan SWEETs. We believe that this database will help the researchers to design mutational experiments and simulation studies that will aid to advance our understanding of the physiological role of SWEET homologs. This database is freely available to the scientific community at http://bioinfo.iitk.ac.in/bioinfo/dbSWEET/Home.     

A New Aspect to the Origin and Evolution of Eukaryotes

One of the most important omissions in recent evolutionary theory concerns how eukaryotes could emerge and evolve. According to the currently accepted views, the first eukaryotic cell possessed a nucleus, an endomembrane system, and a cytoskeleton but had an inefficient prokaryotic-like metabolism. In contrast, one of the most ancient eukaryotes, the metamonada Giardia lamblia, was found to have formerly possessed mitochondria. In sharp contrast with the traditional views, this paper suggests, based on the energetic aspect of genome organization, that the emergence of eukaryotes was promoted by the establishment of an efficient energy-converting organelle, such as the mitochondrion. Mitochondria were acquired by the endosymbiosis of ancient α-purple photosynthetic Gram-negative eubacteria that reorganized the prokaryotic metabolism of the archaebacterial-like ancestral host cells. The presence of an ATP pool in the cytoplasm provided by this cell organelle allowed a major increase in genome size. This evolutionary change, the remarkable increase both in genome size and complexity, explains the origin of the eukaryotic cell itself. The loss of cell wall and the appearance of multicellularity can also be explained by the acquisition of mitochondria. All bacteria use chemiosmotic mechanisms to harness energy; therefore the periplasm bounded by the cell wall is an essential part of prokaryotic cells. Following the establishment of mitochondria, the original plasma membrane-bound metabolism of prokaryotes, as well as the funcion of the periplasm providing a compartment for the formation of different ion gradients, has been transferred into the inner mitochondrial membrane and intermembrane space. After the loss of the essential function of periplasm, the bacterial cell wall could also be lost, which enabled the naked cells to establish direct connections among themselves. The relatively late emergence of mitochondria may be the reason why multicellularity evolved so slowly. Received: 29 May 1997 / Accepted: 9 October 1997