A Distinct Pathway for Polar Exocytosis in Plant Cell Wall Formation

Post-Golgi protein sorting and trafficking to the plasma membrane (PM) is generally believed to occur via the trans-Golgi network (TGN). In this study using Nicotiana tabacum pectin methylesterase (NtPPME1) as a marker, we have identified a TGN-independent polar exocytosis pathway that mediates cell wall formation during cell expansion and cytokinesis. Confocal immunofluorescence and immunogold electron microscopy studies demonstrated that Golgi-derived secretory vesicles (GDSVs) labeled by NtPPME1-GFP are distinct from those organelles belonging to the conventional post-Golgi exocytosis pathway. In addition, pharmaceutical treatments, superresolution imaging, and dynamic studies suggest that NtPPME1 follows a polar exocytic process from Golgi-GDSV-PM/cell plate (CP), which is distinct from the conventional Golgi-TGN-PM/CP secretion pathway. Further studies show that ROP1 regulates this specific polar exocytic pathway. Taken together, we have demonstrated an alternative TGN-independent Golgi-to-PM polar exocytic route, which mediates secretion of NtPPME1 for cell wall formation during cell expansion and cytokinesis and is ROP1-dependent.Plant development and growth require coordinated tissue and cell polarization. Two of the most essential cellular processes involved in polarization are cell expansion and cytokinesis, which determines cell morphology and functions (Jaillais and Gaude, 2008; Dettmer and Friml, 2011; Li et al., 2012). Pollen tube and root hair growth require highly polarized membrane trafficking (Libault et al., 2010; Kroeger and Geitmann, 2012). Cytokinesis, by which new cells are formed, separates daughter cells by forming a new structure within the cytoplasm termed the cell plate (CP). Made up of a cell wall (CW), surrounded by new plasma membrane (PM), the cell plate is generally considered to be an example of internal cell polarity in a nonpolarized plant cell (Bednarek and Falbel, 2002; Baluska et al., 2006).The conventional view of pollen tube tip growth and cell plate formation is supported by polar exocytic secretion of numerous vesicles (diameter of 60–100 nm) to the pollen tube tip and phragmoplast areas during cytokinesis. These polar exocytic vesicles, which are generally believed to originate from the Golgi apparatus, are delivered to the site of secretion via the cytoskeleton and fuse with the target membrane with the aid of fusion factors (Jurgens, 2005; Backues et al., 2007). However, whether these polar exocytic vesicles undergoing post-Golgi trafficking are part of the conventional Golgi-trans-Golgi network (TGN)-PM/CP exocytosis or are derived from some other unidentified exocytic secretion pathway remain unclear.Polar exocytosis is regulated and controlled by a conserved Rho GTPase signaling network in fungi, animals, and plants (Burkel et al., 2012; Ridley, 2013). Rho of plant (ROP), the sole subfamily of Rho GTPases in plant, participate in signaling pathways that regulate cytoskeleton organization and endomembrane trafficking, consequently determining cell polarization, polar growth and cell morphogenesis (Gu et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2008). In growing pollen tubes, ROP1 participates in regulating polar exocytosis in the tip region via two downstream pathways to regulate apical F-actin dynamics: RIC4-mediated F-actin polymerization and RIC3-mediated apical actin depolymerization. A constitutively active mutant of ROP1 (CA-rop1) prevents fusion of these vesicles with the PM and enhances the accumulation of exocytic vesicles in the apical cortex of pollen tubes (Lee et al., 2008). Although ROP GTPases have been extensively researched, their roles in polar membrane expansion in pollen tubes and epidermal pavement cells remains unclear (Xu et al., 2010; Yang and Lavagi, 2012), and there have been insufficient studies on the functions of ROPs in controlling cell plate formation during cytokinesis. Cell division requires precise regulation and spatial organization of the cytoskeleton for delivery of secretion vesicles to the expanding cell plate (Molendijk et al., 2001).In addition, newly made cell walls during cell expansion and cell plate formation require sufficient plasticity in order to integrate new membrane materials to support the polarized membrane extension. They also should be strong enough to withstand the internal turgor pressure and thereby maintain the shape of the cell (Zonia and Munnik, 2011; Hepler et al., 2013). Recent studies have demonstrated that pectins are important for both cytokinesis and cell expansion (Moore and Staehelin, 1988; Bosch et al., 2005; Chebli et al., 2012; Altartouri and Geitmann, 2015; Bidhendi and Geitmann, 2016). Pectins are one of the major cell wall components of the middle lamella and primary cell wall. They are polymerized and methylesterified in the Golgi and subsequently released into the apoplastic space as “soft” methylesterified polymers. The homogalacturonan components of pectin are later de-methylesterified by pectin methylesterases (PMEs). The demethylesterified pectins can be cross-linked, interact with Ca²⁺, and finally form the “hard” pectin matrix of the cell wall. Therefore, the enzymatic activity of PMEs determines the rigidity of the cell wall (Micheli, 2001; Peaucelle et al., 2011).In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) pollen tubes, PMEs are found predominantly polar localized in the tip region and determine the rigidity of the apical cell wall (Bosch et al., 2005; Jiang et al., 2005; Fayant et al., 2010; Chebli et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2013). PME isoform knockout mutants in Arabidopsis (AtPPME1 or vanguard1) produce unstable pollen tubes which burst when germinated in vitro and have reduced fertilization abilities (Jiang et al., 2005; Rockel et al., 2008). Recent studies have shown that in growing tobacco pollen tubes, polar targeting of NtPPME1 to the pollen tube apex depends on an apical F-actin mesh network (Wang et al., 2013). Although the functions of PME in cell wall constriction are well documented, the intracellular secretion and regulation mechanism of the exocytic process of PME still remain largely unexplored. In addition, pectins are also found to be abundant in the forming cell plate, raising the possibility that PMEs may also function during cell plate formation (Moore and Staehelin, 1988; Dhonukshe et al., 2006).In our study, we have used NtPPME1 as a marker to identify a polar exocytic process which is distinct from the conventional Golgi-TGN-PM exocytosis pathway in both pollen tube tip growth and cell plate formation. We have identified a Golgi-derived secretory vesicle (GDSV) for the polar secretion and targeting of NtPPME1 to the cell wall that bypasses the TGN during cell polarization. Further investigations using ROP1 mutants have shown that this polar exocytosis is ROP1 dependent.     

The Arabidopsis Callose Synthase Gene GSL8 Is Required for Cytokinesis and Cell Patterning

Cytokinesis is the division of the cytoplasm and its separation into two daughter cells. Cell plate growth and cytokinesis appear to require callose, but direct functional evidence is still lacking. To determine the role of callose and its synthesis during cytokinesis, we identified and characterized mutants in many members of the GLUCAN SYNTHASE-LIKE (GSL; or CALLOSE SYNTHASE) gene family in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Most gsl mutants (gsl1–gsl7, gsl9, gsl11, and gsl12) exhibited roughly normal seedling growth and development. However, mutations in GSL8, which were previously reported to be gametophytic lethal, were found to produce seedlings with pleiotropic defects during embryogenesis and early vegetative growth. We found cell wall stubs, two nuclei in one cell, and other defects in cell division in homozygous gsl8 insertional alleles. In addition, gsl8 mutants and inducible RNA interference lines of GSL8 showed reduced callose deposition at cell plates and/or new cell walls. Together, these data show that the GSL8 gene encodes a putative callose synthase required for cytokinesis and seedling maturation. In addition, gsl8 mutants disrupt cellular and tissue-level patterning, as shown by the presence of clusters of stomata in direct contact and by islands of excessive cell proliferation in the developing epidermis. Thus, GSL8 is required for patterning as well as cytokinesis during Arabidopsis development.Cytokinesis divides the cytoplasm of a plant cell by the deposition of plasma membrane and a cell wall during late mitosis. This process requires the phragmoplast, a dynamic, plant-specific cytoskeletal and membranous array, which delivers vesicles containing lipids, proteins, and cell wall components to the division plane to construct the cell plate. Cell plate formation involves several stages: initiation through vesicle fusion, the formation of a tubular-vesicular network, a transition to a solely tubular phase, and then further fusion to form a fenestrated sheet (Samuels et al., 1995). The outward growth of the cell plate leads to its fusion with the parental cell wall (Jürgens, 2005a, 2005b; Backues et al., 2007).Key regulators of cytokinesis include KNOLLE, KEULE, KORRIGAN, and HINKEL, which when defective induce pleiotropic phenotypes and seedling lethality (Lukowitz et al., 1996; Nicol et al., 1998; Zuo et al., 2000; Assaad et al., 2001; Strompen et al., 2002). KNOLLE, a syntaxin homolog, is required for the fusion of exocytic vesicles via a SNARE/SNAP33 complex (Lukowitz et al., 1996; Heese et al., 2001). KEULE, a homolog of yeast Sec1p, regulates syntaxin function by interacting with KNOLLE (Waizenegger et al., 2000; Assaad et al., 2001). KORRIGAN is an endo-1,4-β-glucanase required for cell wall biogenesis during cytokinesis (Zuo et al., 2000). And HINKEL is a kinesin-related protein required for the reorganization of phragmoplast microtubules during cytokinesis (Strompen et al., 2002).Additional regulators include Formin5, TWO-IN-ONE (TIO), and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) dynamin-like proteins (ADLs; Kang et al., 2001, 2003; Hong et al., 2003; Collings et al., 2005; Ingouff et al., 2005; Oh et al., 2005). Formin5 localizes to the cell plate and is an actin-organizing protein involved in cytokinesis and cell polarity. TIO, a Ser/Thr protein kinase, functions in cytokinesis in plant meristems and in gametogenesis (Oh et al., 2005). Members of the Arabidopsis DRP family associate with the developing cell plate, whereas DRP1a (ADL1A) locally constricts tubular membranes, interacts with callose synthase, and may facilitate callose deposition into the lumen.Callose, a β-1,3-glucan polymer with β-1,6-branches (Stone and Clarke, 1992), is synthesized in both sporophytic and gametophytic tissues and appears to play various roles. Callose accumulates at the cell plate during cytokinesis, in plasmodesmata, where it regulates cell-to-cell communication, and in dormant phloem, where it seals sieve plates after mechanical injury, pathogen attack, and metal toxicity (Stone and Clarke, 1992; Samuels et al., 1995; Lucas and Lee, 2004).Twelve GLUCAN SYNYHASE-LIKE (GSL) genes (also known as CALLOSE SYNTHASE [CalS]) have been identified in the Arabidopsis genome based on sequence homology (Richmond and Somerville, 2000; Hong et al., 2001; Enns et al., 2005). A GSL that functions in callose deposition after injury and pathogen treatment is GSL5 (Jacobs et al., 2003). Five other members of the Arabidopsis GSL family are required for microgametogenesis. GSL1 and GSL5 act redundantly to produce a callosic wall that prevents microspore degeneration, and both are needed for fertilization (Enns et al., 2005). GSL2 is required for the callosic wall around pollen mother cells, for the patterning of the pollen exine (Dong et al., 2005), and for callose deposition in the wall and plugs of pollen tubes (Nishikawa et al., 2005). GSL8 and GSL10 are independently required for the asymmetric division of microspores and for the entry of microspores into mitosis (Töller et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2009).Callose is a major component of the cell plate, especially during later plate development (Kakimoto and Shibaoka, 1992; Samuels et al., 1995; Hong et al., 2001). Callose appears to structurally reinforce the developing cell plate after the breakdown of the phragmoplast microtubule array and during plate consolidation (Samuels and Staehelin, 1996; Rensing et al., 2002). It is likely that callose is synthesized at the cell plate rather than in the endoplasmic reticulum and in the Golgi (Kakimoto and Shibaoka, 1988). GSL6 (CalS1) appears to be involved in callose synthesis at the cell plate, since a 35S∷GFP-GSL6 fusion in transgenic BY-2 tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cells increases callose accumulation, and GFP fluorescence was found specifically at the cell plate (Hong et al., 2001). However, functional and genetic data on the role of any GSL in Arabidopsis sporophytic cytokinesis are still lacking.Here, we report that GSL8 (CalS10) is required for normal cytokinesis. In addition, gsl8 mutants exhibit excessive cell proliferation and abnormal cell patterning, phenotypes not previously reported for cytokinesis-defective mutants.     

Endosidin 7 Specifically Arrests Late Cytokinesis and Inhibits Callose Biosynthesis,Revealing Distinct Trafficking Events during Cell Plate Maturation

Although cytokinesis is vital for plant growth and development, our mechanistic understanding of the highly regulated membrane and cargo transport mechanisms in relation to polysaccharide deposition during this process is limited. Here, we present an in-depth characterization of the small molecule endosidin 7 (ES7) inhibiting callose synthase activity and arresting late cytokinesis both in vitro and in vivo in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). ES7 is a specific inhibitor for plant callose deposition during cytokinesis that does not affect endomembrane trafficking during interphase or cytoskeletal organization. The specificity of ES7 was demonstrated (1) by comparing its action with that of known inhibitors such as caffeine, flufenacet, and concanamycin A and (2) across kingdoms with a comparison in yeast. The interplay between cell plate-specific post-Golgi vesicle traffic and callose accumulation was analyzed using ES7, and it revealed unique and temporal contributions of secretory and endosomal vesicles in cell plate maturation. While RABA2A-labeled vesicles, which accumulate at the early stage of cell plate formation, were not affected by ES7, KNOLLE was differentially altered by the small molecule. In addition, the presence of clathrin-coated vesicles in cells containing elevated levels of callose and their reduction under ES7 treatment further support the role of endocytic membrane remodeling in the maturing cell plate while the plate is stabilized by callose. Taken together, these data show the essential role of callose during the late stages of cell plate maturation and establish the temporal relationship between vesicles and regulatory proteins at the cell plate assembly matrix during polysaccharide deposition.During plant cytokinesis, the de novo formation of a new cell wall partitions the cytoplasm of the dividing cell (Staehelin and Hepler, 1996; Jürgens, 2005). The formation of the transient cell plate structure is a complex multistep process (Samuels et al., 1995; Jürgens, 2005). At the end of late anaphase, vesicle delivery is guided by the phragmoplast to the center of the dividing cell, the cell plate assembly matrix (CPAM; Samuels et al., 1995). Vesicles at the CPAM undergo homotypic fusion and fission, contributing to the formation of the incipient cell plate (Jürgens, 2005). The initial vesicular fusion and fission events (fusion of Golgi-derived vesicles stage [FVS]) lead to the formation of a tubulovesicular network (TVN), which undergoes a morphological change to form a tubular network (TN). Callose deposition starts during this stage (Supplemental Fig. S1), which is thought to provide mechanical support to the membrane network that ultimately results in the planar fenestrated sheet (PFS). The cell plate expands centrifugally by the accumulation and fusion of newly arriving vesicles at its leading edge. This process is accompanied by the accumulation of new polysaccharides and the removal of excess material maturing at the center. Separation of the daughter cells concludes by fusion of the cell plate with the parental plasma membrane (Samuels et al., 1995).A vast amount of proteins including those involved in vesicle trafficking participate in cell plate formation (McMichael and Bednarek, 2013). Vesicle fusion with the target membrane is mediated by the formation of Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor protein attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes (Bassham and Blatt, 2008). The well-characterized SNARE complex at the cell plate comprises the Q-SNARE KNOLLE and the functionally redundant R-SNARES, the vesicle-associated membrane proteins VAMP721 and VAMP722 (Lauber et al., 1997; Zhang et al., 2011; El Kasmi et al., 2013). The SEC1/Munc18 protein KEULLE, the Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor adaptor protein33, and the novel plant-specific SNARE11 (Assaad et al., 2001; Heese et al., 2001; Zheng et al., 2002) play a role in this SNARE complex formation. Of all the SNAREs required for vesicle fusion at the cell plate, only KNOLLE has been shown to function exclusively in cytokinesis.The formation of the cell plate requires specific amounts of vesicle-delivered membrane and other secretory products. The GTPase RABA2A is necessary for the delivery of trans-Golgi network (TGN)-derived vesicles to the cell plate leading edge (Chow et al., 2008). However, due to the excess delivery of material arriving at the cell plate formation site, it is estimated that 70% is recycled (Samuels et al., 1995; Otegui et al., 2001). Electron microscopy observations indicate the role of clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) in the removal and/or recycling of excess membranes from the cell plate (Samuels et al., 1995; Otegui and Staehelin, 2004; Seguí-Simarro et al., 2004). Specifically, clathrin light chain (CLC), dynamin-related proteins (DRPs), the adaptin-like TPLATE, and AP180 amino-terminal homology/epsin amino-terminal homology domain-containing protein have been identified at the cell plate, providing evidence that clathrin-mediated endocytosis facilitates this membrane recycling (Konopka et al., 2008; Konopka and Bednarek, 2008; Fujimoto et al., 2010; Van Damme et al., 2011; Ito et al., 2012; Song et al., 2012; McMichael and Bednarek, 2013). In addition, it has been suggested that plasma membrane endocytosis contributes material toward de novo cell plate formation (Dhonukshe et al., 2006). However, the level of endocytosis involvement remains questionable, as pharmacological inhibition of endocytosis does not interfere with cytokinesis (Reichardt et al., 2007). The temporal association of different vesicle populations at the CPAM might provide further insights into their contribution to the forming cell plate.Despite the large number of studies investigating membrane dynamics, relatively few studies exist on polysaccharide deposition during cell plate maturation. It has been suggested that callose, a (1,3)-β-glucan, stabilizes the delicate tubular network during the initial cell plate formation stage, until the deposition of additional polysaccharides increases its rigidity (Samuels et al., 1995). Callose accumulation is transient, with the polymer being removed once other polysaccharides such as hemicelluloses, pectins, and cellulose are deposited at the cell plate (Supplemental Fig. S1; Samuels et al., 1995; Albersheim et al., 2010). The timing of callose deposition at the cell plate in relation to that of vesicle trafficking that contributes to cell plate formation is unknown.Genetic studies have indicated a role of callose accumulation at the cell plate (Chen et al., 2009; Thiele et al., 2009; Guseman et al., 2010). However, the lethality of mutant alleles for the callose synthase/glucan synthase-like family (GSL) has hampered the detailed examination of the role of callose synthase and its product in cell plate maturation (Verma and Hong, 2001; Chen et al., 2009; Thiele et al., 2009; Guseman et al., 2010). The ability to transiently perturb callose deposition at the cell plate is key to understanding callose’s contribution to the separation of the daughter cells compared with other polysaccharides.Here, we used pharmacological inhibitors to overcome the challenges of the lethality of callose synthase mutants. In a high-throughput confocal microscopy-based screen for small molecules affecting endosomal trafficking (Drakakaki et al., 2011), endosidin 7 (ES7) was identified as an inhibitor of cell plate formation. ES7 induces characteristic cell plate gaps, observable by the mislocalization of KNOLLE and RABA2A, while it does not affect the localization of endomembrane compartment markers in interphase cells. The potential of ES7 to inhibit callose deposition at the cell plate (Drakakaki et al., 2011) provides avenues to study cell plate maturation. We have characterized the activity of ES7 using both in vitro and in vivo studies establishing its inhibitory effects on callose biosynthesis. We have exploited the properties of ES7 to characterize in detail callose deposition at the cell plate, thereby providing further insight into the overall cell plate formation process. Our results conclusively show that callose is essential for the later stages of cell plate maturation and lay out the temporal association and interplay of TGN and endosomal vesicles during polysaccharide deposition.     

Characterization of the Possible Roles for B Class MADS Box Genes in Regulation of Perianth Formation in Orchid

To investigate sepal/petal/lip formation in Oncidium Gower Ramsey, three paleoAPETALA3 genes, O. Gower Ramsey MADS box gene5 (OMADS5; clade 1), OMADS3 (clade 2), and OMADS9 (clade 3), and one PISTILLATA gene, OMADS8, were characterized. The OMADS8 and OMADS3 mRNAs were expressed in all four floral organs as well as in vegetative leaves. The OMADS9 mRNA was only strongly detected in petals and lips. The mRNA for OMADS5 was only strongly detected in sepals and petals and was significantly down-regulated in lip-like petals and lip-like sepals of peloric mutant flowers. This result revealed a possible negative role for OMADS5 in regulating lip formation. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that OMADS5 formed homodimers and heterodimers with OMADS3 and OMADS9. OMADS8 only formed heterodimers with OMADS3, whereas OMADS3 and OMADS9 formed homodimers and heterodimers with each other. We proposed that sepal/petal/lip formation needs the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9. The determination of the final organ identity for the sepal/petal/lip likely depended on the presence or absence of OMADS5. The presence of OMADS5 caused short sepal/petal formation. When OMADS5 was absent, cells could proliferate, resulting in the possible formation of large lips and the conversion of the sepal/petal into lips in peloric mutants. Further analysis indicated that only ectopic expression of OMADS8 but not OMADS5/9 caused the conversion of the sepal into an expanded petal-like structure in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants.The ABCDE model predicts the formation of any flower organ by the interaction of five classes of homeotic genes in plants (Yanofsky et al., 1990; Jack et al., 1992; Mandel et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Jofuku et al., 1994; Pelaz et al., 2000, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Pinyopich et al., 2003; Ditta et al., 2004; Jack, 2004). The A class genes control sepal formation. The A, B, and E class genes work together to regulate petal formation. The B, C, and E class genes control stamen formation. The C and E class genes work to regulate carpel formation, whereas the D class gene is involved in ovule development. MADS box genes seem to have a central role in flower development, because most ABCDE genes encode MADS box proteins (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Weigel and Meyerowitz, 1994; Purugganan et al., 1995; Rounsley et al., 1995; Theißen and Saedler, 1995; Theißen et al., 2000; Theißen, 2001).The function of B group genes, such as APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), has been thought to have a major role in specifying petal and stamen development (Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Krizek and Meyerowitz, 1996; Kramer et al., 1998; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007; Kanno et al., 2007; Whipple et al., 2007; Irish, 2009). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutation in AP3 or PI caused identical phenotypes of second whorl petal conversion into a sepal structure and third flower whorl stamen into a carpel structure (Bowman et al., 1989; Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994). Similar homeotic conversions for petal and stamen were observed in the mutants of the AP3 and PI orthologs from a number of core eudicots such as Antirrhinum majus, Petunia hybrida, Gerbera hybrida, Solanum lycopersicum, and Nicotiana benthamiana (Sommer et al., 1990; Tröbner et al., 1992; Angenent et al., 1993; van der Krol et al., 1993; Yu et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2004; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; de Martino et al., 2006), from basal eudicot species such as Papaver somniferum and Aquilegia vulgaris (Drea et al., 2007; Kramer et al., 2007), as well as from monocot species such as Zea mays and Oryza sativa (Ambrose et al., 2000; Nagasawa et al., 2003; Prasad and Vijayraghavan, 2003; Yadav et al., 2007; Yao et al., 2008). This indicated that the function of the B class genes AP3 and PI is highly conserved during evolution.It has been thought that B group genes may have arisen from an ancestral gene through multiple gene duplication events (Doyle, 1994; Theißen et al., 1996, 2000; Purugganan, 1997; Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999; Lamb and Irish, 2003; Kim et al., 2004; Stellari et al., 2004; Zahn et al., 2005; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007). In the gymnosperms, there was a single putative B class lineage that duplicated to generate the paleoAP3 and PI lineages in angiosperms (Kramer et al., 1998; Theißen et al., 2000; Irish, 2009). The paleoAP3 lineage is composed of AP3 orthologs identified in lower eudicots, magnolid dicots, and monocots (Kramer et al., 1998). Genes in this lineage contain the conserved paleoAP3- and PI-derived motifs in the C-terminal end of the proteins, which have been thought to be characteristics of the B class ancestral gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Tzeng and Yang, 2001; Hsu and Yang, 2002). The PI lineage is composed of PI orthologs that contain a highly conserved PI motif identified in most plant species (Kramer et al., 1998). Subsequently, there was a second duplication at the base of the core eudicots that produced the euAP3 and TM6 lineages, which have been subject to substantial sequence changes in eudicots during evolution (Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999). The paleoAP3 motif in the C-terminal end of the proteins was retained in the TM6 lineage and replaced by a conserved euAP3 motif in the euAP3 lineage of most eudicot species (Kramer et al., 1998). In addition, many lineage-specific duplications for paleoAP3 lineage have occurred in plants such as orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009), Ranunculaceae, and Ranunculales (Kramer et al., 2003; Di Stilio et al., 2005; Shan et al., 2006; Kramer, 2009).Unlike the A or C class MADS box proteins, which form homodimers that regulate flower development, the ability of B class proteins to form homodimers has only been reported in gymnosperms and in the paleoAP3 and PI lineages of some monocots. For example, LMADS1 of the lily Lilium longiflorum (Tzeng and Yang, 2001), OMADS3 of the orchid Oncidium Gower Ramsey (Hsu and Yang, 2002), and PeMADS4 of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris (Tsai et al., 2004) in the paleoAP3 lineage, LRGLOA and LRGLOB of the lily Lilium regale (Winter et al., 2002), TGGLO of the tulip Tulipa gesneriana (Kanno et al., 2003), and PeMADS6 of the orchid P. equestris (Tsai et al., 2005) in the PI lineage, and GGM2 of the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon (Winter et al., 1999) were able to form homodimers that regulate flower development. Proteins in the euAP3 lineage and in most paleoAP3 lineages were not able to form homodimers and had to interact with PI to form heterodimers in order to regulate petal and stamen development in various plant species (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 1992; Tröbner et al., 1992; Riechmann et al., 1996; Moon et al., 1999; Winter et al., 2002; Kanno et al., 2003; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2008). In addition to forming dimers, AP3 and PI were able to interact with other MADS box proteins, such as SEPALLATA1 (SEP1), SEP2, and SEP3, to regulate petal and stamen development (Pelaz et al., 2000; Honma and Goto, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Castillejo et al., 2005).Orchids are among the most important plants in the flower market around the world, and research on MADS box genes has been reported for several species of orchids during the past few years (Lu et al., 1993, 2007; Yu and Goh, 2000; Hsu and Yang, 2002; Yu et al., 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2004, 2008; Xu et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009). Unlike the flowers in eudicots, the nearly identical shape of the sepals and petals as well as the production of a unique lip in orchid flowers make them a very special plant species for the study of flower development. Four clades (1–4) of genes in the paleoAP3 lineage have been identified in several orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009). Several works have described the possible interactions among these four clades of paleoAP3 genes and one PI gene that are involved in regulating the differentiation and formation of the sepal/petal/lip of orchids (Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009). However, the exact mechanism that involves the orchid B class genes remains unclear and needs to be clarified by more experimental investigations.O. Gower Ramsey is a popular orchid with important economic value in cut flower markets. Only a few studies have been reported on the role of MADS box genes in regulating flower formation in this plant species (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). An AP3-like MADS gene that regulates both floral formation and initiation in transgenic Arabidopsis has been reported (Hsu and Yang, 2002). In addition, four AP1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 (AGL9)-like MADS box genes have been characterized that show novel expression patterns and cause different effects on floral transition and formation in Arabidopsis (Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). Compared with other orchids, the production of a large and well-expanded lip and five small identical sepals/petals makes O. Gower Ramsey a special case for the study of the diverse functions of B class MADS box genes during evolution. Therefore, the isolation of more B class MADS box genes and further study of their roles in the regulation of perianth (sepal/petal/lip) formation during O. Gower Ramsey flower development are necessary. In addition to the clade 2 paleoAP3 gene OMADS3, which was previously characterized in our laboratory (Hsu and Yang, 2002), three more B class MADS box genes, OMADS5, OMADS8, and OMADS9, were characterized from O. Gower Ramsey in this study. Based on the different expression patterns and the protein interactions among these four orchid B class genes, we propose that the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9 is required for sepal/petal/lip formation. Further sepal and petal formation at least requires the additional presence of OMADS5, whereas large lip formation was seen when OMADS5 expression was absent. Our results provide a new finding and information pertaining to the roles for orchid B class MADS box genes in the regulation of sepal/petal/lip formation.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

The K-Segment of Maize DHN1 Mediates Binding to Anionic Phospholipid Vesicles and Concomitant Structural Changes

Dehydrins (DHNs; late embryogenesis abundant D11 family) are a family of intrinsically unstructured plant proteins that accumulate in the late stages of seed development and in vegetative tissues subjected to water deficit, salinity, low temperature, or abscisic acid treatment. We demonstrated previously that maize (Zea mays) DHNs bind preferentially to anionic phospholipid vesicles; this binding is accompanied by an increase in α-helicity of the protein, and adoption of α-helicity can be induced by sodium dodecyl sulfate. All DHNs contain at least one “K-segment,” a lysine-rich 15-amino acid consensus sequence. The K-segment is predicted to form a class A2 amphipathic α-helix, a structural element known to interact with membranes and proteins. Here, three K-segment deletion proteins of maize DHN1 were produced. Lipid vesicle-binding assays revealed that the K-segment is required for binding to anionic phospholipid vesicles, and adoption of α-helicity of the K-segment accounts for most of the conformational change of DHNs upon binding to anionic phospholipid vesicles or sodium dodecyl sulfate. The adoption of structure may help stabilize cellular components, including membranes, under stress conditions.When plants encounter environmental stresses such as drought or low temperature, various responses take place to adapt to these conditions. Typical responses include increased expression of chaperones, signal transduction pathway and late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, osmotic adjustment, and induction of degradation and repair systems (Ingram and Bartels, 1996).Dehydrins (DHNs; LEA D11 family) are a subfamily of group 2 LEA proteins that accumulate to high levels during late stages of seed development and in vegetative tissues subjected to water deficit, salinity, low temperature, or abscisic acid (ABA) treatment (Svensson et al., 2002). Some DHNs are expressed constitutively during normal growth (Nylander et al., 2001; Rorat et al., 2004, 2006; Rodriguez et al., 2005). DHNs exist in a wide range of photosynthetic organisms, including angiosperms, gymnosperms, algae, and mosses (Svensson et al., 2002). DHNs are encoded by a dispersed multigene family and are differentially regulated, at least in higher plants. For example, 13 Dhn genes have been identified in barley (Hordeum vulgare), dispersed over seven genetic map locations (Choi et al., 1999; Svensson et al., 2002) and regulated variably by drought, low temperature, and embryo development (Tommasini et al., 2008). DHNs are localized in various subcellular compartments, including cytosol (Roberts et al., 1993), nucleus (Houde et al., 1995), chloroplast (Artus et al., 1996), vacuole (Heyen et al., 2002), and proximal to the plasma membrane and protein bodies (Asghar et al., 1994; Egerton-Warburton et al., 1997; Puhakainen et al., 2004). Elevated expression of Dhn genes generally has been correlated with the acquisition of tolerance to abiotic stresses such as drought (Whitsitt et al., 1997), salt (Godoy et al., 1994; Jayaprakash et al., 1998), chilling (Ismail et al., 1999a), or freezing (Houde et al., 1995; Danyluk et al., 1998; Fowler et al., 2001). The differences in expression and tissue location suggest that individual members of the Dhn multigene family have somewhat distinct biological functions (Close, 1997; Zhu et al., 2000; Nylander et al., 2001). Many studies have observed a positive correlation between the accumulation of DHNs and tolerance to abiotic stresses (Svensson et al., 2002). However, overexpression of a single DHN protein has not, in general, been sufficient to confer stress tolerance (Puhakainen et al., 2004).DHNs are subclassified by sequence motifs referred to as the K-segment (Lys-rich consensus sequence), the Y-segment (N-terminal conserved sequence), the S-segment (a tract of Ser residues), and the φ-segment (Close, 1996). Because of high hydrophilicity, high content of Gly (>20%), and the lack of a defined three-dimensional structure in the pure form (Lisse et al., 1996), DHNs have been categorized as “intrinsically disordered/unstructured proteins” or “hydrophilins” (Wright and Dyson, 1999; Garay-Arroyo et al., 2000; Tompa, 2005; Kovacs et al., 2008). On the basis of compositional and biophysical properties and their link to abiotic stresses, several functions of DHNs have been proposed, including ion sequestration (Roberts et al., 1993), water retention (McCubbin et al., 1985), and stabilization of membranes or proteins (Close, 1996, 1997). Observations from in vitro experiments include DHN binding to lipid vesicles (Koag et al., 2003; Kovacs et al., 2008) or metals (Svensson et al., 2000; Heyen et al., 2002; Kruger et al., 2002; Alsheikh et al., 2003; Hara et al., 2005), protection of membrane lipid against peroxidation (Hara et al., 2003), retention of hydration or ion sequestration (Bokor et al., 2005; Tompa et al., 2006), and chaperone activity against the heat-induced inactivation and aggregation of various proteins (Kovacs et al., 2008).Intrinsically disordered/unstructured proteins that lack a well-defined three-dimensional structure have recently been recognized to be prevalent in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Oldfield et al., 2005). They fulfill important functions in signal transduction, gene expression, and binding to targets such as protein, RNA, ions, and membranes (Wright and Dyson, 1999; Tompa, 2002; Dyson and Wright, 2005). The disorder confers structural flexibility and malleability to adapt to changes in the protein environment, including water potential, pH, ionic strength, and temperature, and to undergo structural transition when complexed with ligands such as other proteins, DNA, RNA, or membranes (Prestrelski et al., 1993; Uversky, 2002). Structural changes from disorder to ordered functional structure also can be induced by the folding of a partner protein (Wright and Dyson, 1999; Tompa, 2002; Mouillon et al., 2008).The idea that DHNs interact with membranes is consistent with many immunolocalization studies, which have shown that DHNs accumulate near the plasma membrane or membrane-rich areas surrounding lipid and protein bodies (Asghar et al., 1994; Egerton-Warburton et al., 1997; Danyluk et al., 1998; Puhakainen et al., 2004). The K-segment is predicted to form a class A2 amphipathic α-helix, in which hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues are arranged on opposite faces (Close, 1996). The amphipathic α-helix is a structural element known to interact with membranes and proteins (Epand et al., 1995). Also, in the presence of helical inducers such as SDS and trifluoroethanol (Dalal and Pio, 2006), DHNs take on α-helicity (Lisse et al., 1996; Ismail et al., 1999b). We previously examined the binding of DHN1 to liposomes and found that DHNs bind preferentially to anionic phospholipids and that this binding is accompanied by an increase in α-helicity of the protein (Koag et al., 2003). Similarly, a mitochondrial LEA protein, one of the group III LEA proteins, recently has been shown to interact with and protect membranes subjected to desiccation, coupled with the adoption of amphipathic α-helices (Tolleter et al., 2007).Here, we explore the basis of DHN-vesicle interaction using K-segment deletion proteins. This study reveals that the K-segment is necessary and sufficient for binding to anionic phospholipid vesicles and that the adoption of α-helicity of DHN proteins can be attributed mainly to the K-segment.     

Phosphorylation of the C Terminus of RHD3 Has a Critical Role in Homotypic ER Membrane Fusion in Arabidopsis

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) consists of dynamically changing tubules and cisternae. In animals and yeast, homotypic ER membrane fusion is mediated by fusogens (atlastin and Sey1p, respectively) that are membrane-associated dynamin-like GTPases. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), another dynamin-like GTPase, ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE3 (RHD3), has been proposed as an ER membrane fusogen, but direct evidence is lacking. Here, we show that RHD3 has an ER membrane fusion activity that is enhanced by phosphorylation of its C terminus. The ER network was RHD3-dependently reconstituted from the cytosol and microsome fraction of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cultured cells by exogenously adding GTP, ATP, and F-actin. We next established an in vitro assay system of ER tubule formation with Arabidopsis ER vesicles, in which addition of GTP caused ER sac formation from the ER vesicles. Subsequent application of a shearing force to this system triggered the formation of tubules from the ER sacs in an RHD-dependent manner. Unexpectedly, in the absence of a shearing force, Ser/Thr kinase treatment triggered RHD3-dependent tubule formation. Mass spectrometry showed that RHD3 was phosphorylated at multiple Ser and Thr residues in the C terminus. An antibody against the RHD3 C-terminal peptide abolished kinase-triggered tubule formation. When the Ser cluster was deleted or when the Ser residues were replaced with Ala residues, kinase treatment had no effect on tubule formation. Kinase treatment induced the oligomerization of RHD3. Neither phosphorylation-dependent modulation of membrane fusion nor oligomerization has been reported for atlastin or Sey1p. Taken together, we propose that phosphorylation-stimulated oligomerization of RHD3 enhances ER membrane fusion to form the ER network.In eukaryotic cells, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the organelle with the largest membrane area. The ER consists of an elaborate network of interconnected membrane tubules and cisternae that is continually moving and being remodeled (Friedman and Voeltz, 2011). In plant cells, ER movement and remodeling is primarily driven by the actin-myosin XI cytoskeleton (Sparkes et al., 2009; Ueda et al., 2010; Yokota et al., 2011; Griffing et al., 2014) and secondarily by the microtubule cytoskeleton (Hamada et al., 2014). Several factors involved in creating the ER architecture have been also identified (Anwar et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2012; Goyal and Blackstone, 2013; Sackmann, 2014; Stefano et al., 2014a; Westrate et al., 2015). Among them, ER membrane-bound GTPases, animal atlastins and yeast Sey1p (Synthetic Enhancement of Yop1), function as ER fusogens to form the interconnected tubular network (Hu et al., 2009; Orso et al., 2009; Anwar et al., 2012). Atlastin molecules on the two opposed membranes have been proposed to transiently dimerize to attract the two membranes to each other (Bian et al., 2011; Byrnes and Sondermann, 2011; Morin-Leisk et al., 2011; Moss et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2012; Byrnes et al., 2013). Closely attracted lipid bilayers are supposed to be destabilized by an amphipathic helical domain at the atlastin C terminus to facilitate membrane fusion (Bian et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2012; Faust et al., 2015). Knockdown of atlastins leads to fragmentation of the ER and unbranched ER tubules, while overexpression of atlastins enhances ER membrane fusion, which enlarges the ER profiles (Hu et al., 2009; Orso et al., 2009).An Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) protein, ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE3 (RHD3), has been proposed as a fusogen because (1) when it is disrupted, the ER network is modified into large cable-like strands of poorly branched membranes (Zheng et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2011; Stefano et al., 2012), (2) it shares sequence similarity with the above-mentioned fusogen Sey1p (Hu et al., 2009), and (3) it has structural similarity to atlastin and Sey1p, with a functional GTPase domain at the N-terminal cytosolic domain (Stefano et al., 2012) followed by two transmembrane domains and a cytosolic tail. RHD3 has a longer cytosolic C-terminal tail than do atlastin and Sey1p (Stefano and Brandizzi, 2014). It contains not only an amphipathic region but also a Ser/Thr-rich C terminus.Arabidopsis has two RHD3 isoforms called RHD3-Like 1 and RHD3-Like 2. Fluorescently tagged RHD3 and RHD3-Like 2 localize to the ER (Chen et al., 2011; Stefano et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2013). RHD3 and the two RHD3-Like proteins likely have redundant roles in ER membrane fusion (Zhang et al., 2013). Overexpression of either RHD3 or RHD3-Like 2 with a defective GTPase domain phenocopies the aberrant ER morphology in rhd3-deficient mutants (Chen et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2013).In this study, we show that the Ser/Thr-rich C terminus enhances ER membrane fusion following phosphorylation of its C terminus. We propose a model in which phosphorylation and oligomerization of RHD3 is required for efficient ER membrane fusion. Our findings clarify the mechanisms that regulate RHD3 and consequently the homeostasis of membrane fusion in the ER.