A kinetic and thermodynamic framework for the Azoarcus group I ribozyme reaction

Determination of quantitative thermodynamic and kinetic frameworks for ribozymes derived from the Azoarcus group I intron and comparisons to their well-studied analogs from the Tetrahymena group I intron reveal similarities and differences between these RNAs. The guanosine (G) substrate binds to the Azoarcus and Tetrahymena ribozymes with similar equilibrium binding constants and similar very slow association rate constants. These and additional literature observations support a model in which the free ribozyme is not conformationally competent to bind G and in which the probability of assuming the binding-competent state is determined by tertiary interactions of peripheral elements. As proposed previously, the slow binding of guanosine may play a role in the specificity of group I intron self-splicing, and slow binding may be used analogously in other biological processes. The internal equilibrium between ribozyme-bound substrates and products is similar for these ribozymes, but the Azoarcus ribozyme does not display the coupling in the binding of substrates that is observed with the Tetrahymena ribozyme, suggesting that local preorganization of the active site and rearrangements within the active site upon substrate binding are different for these ribozymes. Our results also confirm the much greater tertiary binding energy of the 5′-splice site analog with the Azoarcus ribozyme, binding energy that presumably compensates for the fewer base-pairing interactions to allow the 5′-exon intermediate in self splicing to remain bound subsequent to 5′-exon cleavage and prior to exon ligation. Most generally, these frameworks provide a foundation for design and interpretation of experiments investigating fundamental properties of these and other structured RNAs.     

Defective splicing induced by 4NQO in the hamster hprt gene

The molecular analysis of mutations affecting mRNA processing may contribute to a better understanding of the splicing mechanism through the identification of genomic sequences necessary for the recognition of splice sites. In this paper we report the sequence analysis of 14 splice mutants induced by 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4NQO) at the hamster hypoxanthine-guanine-phosphoribosyltransferase (hprt) locus. We show that mutations at the 3′ acceptor splice site or at the first or fifth base of the 5′ donor splice site are responsible for exon skipping. In addition, mutations in exon sequences also determine the skipping of one or more exons. Our data indicate that point mutations in intron regions at either side of an internal exon may induce the skipping of the same exon, supporting a model where the exon is the unit of early spliceosome assembly. Furthermore, they suggest that the splicing of hprt mRNA precursors may proceed through a clustering of exons 2, 3 and 4 which are then spliced in a concerted way.     

Insights into the history of a bacterial group II intron remnant from the genomes of the nitrogen-fixing symbionts Sinorhizobium meliloti and Sinorhizobium medicae

Group II introns are self-splicing catalytic RNAs that act as mobile retroelements. In bacteria, they are thought to be tolerated to some extent because they self-splice and home preferentially to sites outside of functional genes, generally within intergenic regions or in other mobile genetic elements, by mechanisms including the divergence of DNA target specificity to prevent target site saturation. RmInt1 is a mobile group II intron that is widespread in natural populations of Sinorhizobium meliloti and was first described in the GR4 strain. Like other bacterial group II introns, RmInt1 tends to evolve toward an inactive form by fragmentation, with loss of the 3′ terminus. We identified genomic evidence of a fragmented intron closely related to RmInt1 buried in the genome of the extant S. meliloti/S. medicae species. By studying this intron, we obtained evidence for the occurrence of intron insertion before the divergence of ancient rhizobial species. This fragmented group II intron has thus existed for a long time and has provided sequence variation, on which selection can act, contributing to diverse genetic rearrangements, and to generate pan-genome divergence after strain differentiation. The data presented here suggest that fragmented group II introns within intergenic regions closed to functionally important neighboring genes may have been microevolutionary forces driving adaptive evolution of these rhizobial species.     

Dual roles for the Mss116 cofactor during splicing of the ai5γ group II intron

The autocatalytic group II intron ai5γ from Saccharomyces cerevisiae self-splices under high-salt conditions in vitro, but requires the assistance of the DEAD-box protein Mss116 in vivo and under near-physiological conditions in vitro. Here, we show that Mss116 influences the folding mechanism in several ways. By comparing intron precursor RNAs with long (∼300 nt) and short (∼20 nt) exons, we observe that long exon sequences are a major obstacle for self-splicing in vitro. Kinetic analysis indicates that Mss116 not only mitigates the inhibitory effects of long exons, but also assists folding of the intron core. Moreover, a mutation in conserved Motif III that impairs unwinding activity (SAT → AAA) only affects the construct with long exons, suggesting helicase unwinding during exon unfolding, but not in intron folding. Strong parallels between Mss116 and the related protein Cyt-19 from Neurospora crassa suggest that these proteins form a subclass of DEAD-box proteins that possess a versatile repertoire of diverse activities for resolving the folding problems of large RNAs.     

Regulation of glutamate receptor B pre-mRNA splicing by RNA editing

RNA-editing enzymes of the ADAR family convert adenosines to inosines in double-stranded RNA substrates. Frequently, editing sites are defined by base-pairing of the editing site with a complementary intronic region. The glutamate receptor subunit B (GluR-B) pre-mRNA harbors two such exonic editing sites termed Q/R and R/G. Data from ADAR knockout mice and in vitro editing assays suggest an intimate connection between editing and splicing of GluR-B pre-mRNA.

By comparing the events at the Q/R and R/G sites, we can show that editing can both stimulate and repress splicing efficiency. The edited nucleotide, but not ADAR binding itself, is sufficient to exert this effect. The presence of an edited nucleotide at the R/G site reduces splicing efficiency of the adjacent intron facilitating alternative splicing events occurring downstream of the R/G site.

Lack of editing inhibits splicing at the Q/R site. Editing of both the Q/R nucleotide and an intronic editing hotspot are required to allow efficient splicing. Inefficient intron removal may ensure that only properly edited mRNAs become spliced and exported to the cytoplasm.

     

Different evolutionary pathway of B*570101 and B*5801 (B17 group) alleles based in intron sequences

Two theories about MHC allele generation have been put forward: (1) point mutation diversification and/or (2) gene conversion events. A model supporting the existence of both of these mechanisms is shown in this paper; the possible evolution of the HLA-B*570101 and HLA-B*5801 alleles (which belong to the HLA-B17 serology group) is studied. The hypothesis favoured is that gene conversion events have originated these alleles, because intron sequences are also analysed. Evolution by point mutation should only be accepted if flanking introns have also been sequenced.The nucleotide sequence data (exons and introns) reported in this paper have been sequenced in our laboratory. They are in the GenBank nucleotide sequence database and have been assigned the accession numbers: B*150101—(a) exon 1, L79939; (b) exon 2 and exon 3, L48400; (c) intron 1, L76249; (d) intron 2, L42468; B*1515—(a) exon 1, exon 2 and exon 3, L49343; (b) intron 1 and intron 2, L76254; B*1539—(a) exon 2, AF033501; (b) exon 3, AF033502; (c) intron 1, AF034961; (d) intron 2 AF034962; B*350101—(a) exon 1, exon 2 and exon 3, L63544; (b) intron 1, L79921; (c) intron 2, L57505; B*510101—(a) exon 1, L77204; (b) exon 2 and exon 3, L47985; (c) intron 1, L76245; (d) intron 2, L42469; B*520102—(a) exon 1, L77205; (b) exon 2 and exon 3, L47984; (c) intron 1, L76244; (d) intron 2, L76251; B*5301—(a) exon 1, intron 1, exon 2, intron 2 and exon 3, U90566; B*1302—(a) intron 1, exon 2, intron 2, exon 3, AF196182; B*400101/02—(a) exon 2 and exon 3, L79937; (b) intron 1, L79919; (c) intron 2, L76629; B*4101—(a) intron 1, exon 2, intron 2 and exon 3, U90560; B*4102 (a) intron 1, exon 2, intron 2 and exon 3, AF 126199; B*4501—(a) intron 1, exon 2, intron 2 and exon 3, U90562; B*570101—(a) intron 1, exon 2, intron 2 and exon 3, AF196183; B*5801—(a) intron 1, exon 2, intron 2 and exon 3, AF196184All exon sequences were officially assigned as confirmatory by the WHO Nomenclature Committee in December 2003: B*1302, B*150101, B*350101, B*400101/02, B*4101, B*510101, B*570101, B*5801, B*5301, B*4501, B*520102, B*1515, B*4102 and B*1539. This follows the agreed policy that, subject to the conditions stated in the Nomenclature Report [Marsh et al. (2002) Tissue Antigens 60:407–464], names will be assigned to new sequences as they are identified. Lists of such new names will be published in the following WHO Nomenclature Report     

Role of helical constraints of the EBS1–IBS1 duplex of a group II intron on demarcation of the 5′ splice site

Recognition of the 5′ splice site by group II introns involves pairing between an exon binding sequence (EBS) 1 within the ID3 stem–loop of domain 1 and a complementary sequence at the 3′ end of exon 1 (IBS1). To identify the molecular basis for splice site definition of a group IIB ai5γ intron, we probed the solution structure of the ID3 stem–loop alone and upon binding of its IBS1 target by solution NMR. The ID3 stem was structured. The base of the ID3 loop was stacked but displayed a highly flexible EBS1 region. The flexibility of EBS1 appears to be a general feature of the ai5γ and the smaller Oceanobacillus iheyensis (O.i.) intron and may help in effective search of conformational space and prevent errors in splicing as a result of fortuitous base-pairing. Binding of IBS1 results in formation of a structured seven base pair duplex that terminates at the 5′ splice site in spite of the potential for additional A-U and G•U pairs. Comparison of these data with conformational features of EBS1–IBS1 duplexes extracted from published structures suggests that termination of the duplex and definition of the splice site are governed by constraints of the helical geometry within the ID3 loop. This feature and flexibility of the uncomplexed ID3 loop appear to be common for both the ai5γ and O.i. introns and may help to fine-tune elements of recognition in group II introns.