TOR Complex 2 Controls Gene Silencing,Telomere Length Maintenance,and Survival under DNA-Damaging Conditions

The Target Of Rapamycin (TOR) kinase belongs to the highly conserved eukaryotic family of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-related kinases (PIKKs). TOR proteins are found at the core of two distinct evolutionarily conserved complexes, TORC1 and TORC2. Disruption of TORC1 or TORC2 results in characteristically dissimilar phenotypes. TORC1 is a major cell growth regulator, while the cellular roles of TORC2 are not well understood. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Tor1 is a component of the TORC2 complex, which is particularly required during starvation and various stress conditions. Our genome-wide gene expression analysis of Δtor1 mutants indicates an extensive similarity with chromatin structure mutants. Consistently, TORC2 regulates several chromatin-mediated functions, including gene silencing, telomere length maintenance, and tolerance to DNA damage. These novel cellular roles of TORC2 are rapamycin insensitive. Cells lacking Tor1 are highly sensitive to the DNA-damaging drugs hydroxyurea (HU) and methyl methanesulfonate, similar to mutants of the checkpoint kinase Rad3 (ATR). Unlike Rad3, Tor1 is not required for the cell cycle arrest in the presence of damaged DNA. Instead, Tor1 becomes essential for dephosphorylation and reactivation of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc2, thus allowing reentry into mitosis following recovery from DNA replication arrest. Taken together, our data highlight critical roles for TORC2 in chromatin metabolism and in promoting mitotic entry, most notably after recovery from DNA-damaging conditions. These data place TOR proteins in line with other PIKK members, such as ATM and ATR, as guardians of genome stability.The TOR protein kinase is a major cell growth regulator that links cellular growth with cell divisions (18, 42, 64, 65). TOR is an atypical protein kinase conserved from yeast to humans that was isolated as the target of the immunosuppressive and anticancer drug rapamycin (28). TOR proteins can be found in two distinct complexes, known as TORC1 and TORC2 (27, 64). These complexes mediate their distinct cellular functions via phosphorylation and activation of different sets of AGC-like kinases, including mammalian p70S6K, downstream of TORC1, and AKT/protein kinase B (PKB) downstream of TORC2 (18). TORC1 in mammals contains mTOR (Tor1 or Tor2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Tor2 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe) and the Raptor protein (Kog1 in S. cerevisiae; Mip1 in S. pombe). TORC1 in many different eukaryotes plays a central role in the control of growth (mass accumulation) in response to external stimuli, particularly nutrient availability. Disruption of TORC1, either by mutating its components or by rapamycin treatment, can lead to a starvation-like phenotype (64). The cellular roles of TORC2, on the other hand, are less well defined. TORC2 in mammals contains mTOR (Tor2 in S. cerevisiae; Tor1 in S. pombe) together with Rictor (Avo3 in S. cerevisiae; Ste20 in S. pombe) and mSin1 (Avo1 in S. cerevisiae; Sin1 in S. pombe). TORC2 plays a role in regulating the actin cytoskeleton and cell wall integrity pathway in S. cerevisiae (3, 15, 27), a function that is at least partially conserved in human cells (17, 47).Fission yeast contains two TOR homologues, Tor1 and Tor2 (59), which form the TORC2 and TORC1 complexes, respectively (14, 32). Disruption tor2⁺ (TORC1) mimics nitrogen starvation responses (1, 14, 32, 56, 57, 62), while disruption of tor1⁺ (TORC2) results in pleiotropic defects, including elongated cells, sensitivity to osmotic and oxidative stress, inability to execute developmental processes in response to nutrient depletion, and a decrease in amino acid uptake (16, 22, 59). Tor1 regulates cell survival under stress conditions and starvation responses via the AGC protein kinase Gad8, a putative homologue of mammalian AKT/PKB (16).In budding yeast and mammalian cells, TORC1 mediates the rapamycin-sensitive signaling branch while TORC2 is far less sensitive to inhibition by this drug (27, 48). Curiously, rapamycin does not inhibit growth of S. pombe cells but partially inhibits sexual development and amino acid uptake (60-62). Inhibition of amino acid uptake is likely a result of inhibiting Tor1 (61, 62). Accordingly, a tor1 rapamycin-defective allele (tor1^S1834E) confers rapamycin resistance to strains that are dependent on amino acid uptake for their growth (61). Yet rapamycin also induces a response similar to that for a shift from rich to poor nitrogen conditions, an effect that may involve inhibition of both Tor1 and Tor2 (41).While other members of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-related kinase (PIKK) family of proteins, such as ATM and ATR, have been shown to play central roles in the DNA damage response, little is known about roles that TOR proteins might play in such processes. Recently it was shown that the rapamycin-sensitive TORC1 complex participates in regulating cell survival under DNA-damaging conditions (24, 42, 49). Currently, no such role has been attributed to TORC2.Here we show that Tor1 (TORC2) is critical for cell survival under DNA-damaging conditions, gene silencing at heterochromatic regions, and telomere length maintenance and for regulation of cell cycle progression. Since the TOR complexes are highly conserved in evolution, this novel TORC2 function may also be conserved in other organisms.     

A Role for p38 Stress-Activated Protein Kinase in Regulation of Cell Growth via TORC1

The target of rapamycin (TOR) complex 1 (TORC1) signaling pathway is a critical regulator of translation and cell growth. To identify novel components of this pathway, we performed a kinome-wide RNA interference (RNAi) screen in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. RNAi targeting components of the p38 stress-activated kinase cascade prevented the cell size increase elicited by depletion of the TOR negative regulator TSC2. In mammalian and Drosophila tissue culture, as well as in Drosophila ovaries ex vivo, p38-activating stresses, such as H₂O₂ and anisomycin, were able to activate TORC1. This stress-induced TORC1 activation could be blocked by RNAi against mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3 and 6 (MKK3/6) or by the overexpression of dominant negative Rags. Interestingly, p38 was also required for the activation of TORC1 in response to amino acids and growth factors. Genetic ablation either of p38b or licorne, its upstream kinase, resulted in small flies consisting of small cells. Mutants with mutations in licorne or p38b are nutrition sensitive; low-nutrient food accentuates the small-organism phenotypes, as well as the partial lethality of the p38b null allele. These data suggest that p38 is an important positive regulator of TORC1 in both mammalian and Drosophila systems in response to certain stresses and growth factors.The target of rapamycin, TOR, is a highly conserved serine/threonine kinase that is a critical regulator of cell growth. It is a core component of two signaling complexes, TORC1 and TORC2 (60, 74). TORC1 is defined by the presence of Raptor in the complex, while TORC2 contains Rictor. Rictor and Raptor are mutually exclusive. Activation of the TORC1 pathway leads to increased protein translation, increased cell size, and increased proliferation, making this pathway an important target for emerging cancer therapies. Rapamycin is an inhibitor of TORC1 that is commonly used as an immunosuppressant following kidney transplantation (51). At least three analogs of rapamycin are currently being tested in solid and hematological tumors and have shown some promising results (21).The TORC1 pathway responds to numerous inputs, sensing both the desirability of and the capacity for growth. Many of these pathways control TORC1 signaling through phosphorylation of the tuberous sclerosis protein TSC2. TSC2 associates with TSC1 to form a heterodimeric GTPase-activating protein complex (GAP) that inactivates the small GTPase Rheb (24, 29, 67). While the exact molecular mechanism remains a topic of debate, activation of Rheb promotes the kinase activity of TORC1 (24, 29, 67). Rheb is required for the activation of TORC1 in response to both amino acids and growth factors (55, 62). In Drosophila melanogaster, mutation of either TOR or Rheb inhibits growth, leading to reduced body size and reduced cell size in mutant clones (42, 64). Mutation of either TSC1 or TSC2 has the predicted opposite effect, as tissue deficient for either of these proteins overgrows and contains large cells (49, 66).TORC1 is activated via the phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase (PI3′K) pathway by growth-promoting mitogens, such as insulin and growth factors. Drosophila mutants with mutations of PI3′K pathway components have size phenotypes similar to those of the TOR and Rheb mutants (71). In mammalian cells, the PI3′K-mediated activation of TORC1 occurs at least in part through the phosphorylation of TSC2 by the PI3′K target AKT (30, 50). Interestingly, mutation of these residues in Drosophila has no impact on TSC2 function in vivo, suggesting that there may be other mechanisms through which PI3′K can activate Drosophila TOR (20). Recent work has suggested that the proline-rich AKT substrate PRAS40 may provide part of this link (23, 59, 69, 70). In addition, signaling through RAS activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK), which can phosphorylate TSC2 and Raptor to activate TORC1 (13, 40, 56). There are also likely to be additional mechanisms through which growth factors activate Drosophila TOR that have not yet been identified.TORC1 activity is also controlled by the intracellular building blocks necessary to support cellular growth. The energy-sensing AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway relays information about the energy status of the cell to TORC1 by phosphorylating TSC2. Unlike the inactivating phosphorylation of TSC2 by Akt, phosphorylation of TSC2 by AMPK promotes the GAP activity of the TSC complex (31). AMPK also phosphorylates Raptor, leading to decreased TORC1 activity (28). Thus, when energy levels are low, active AMPK inhibits TORC1.Amino acids also activate the TORC1 pathway, through a mechanism that requires Rheb, as well as the type III PI3′K VPS34 and the serine/threonine kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 3 (MAP4K3) (11, 22, 43). TORC1 thereby integrates information about the availability of amino acids and the amount of energy available for growth with growth factor signaling. Given its ancient function in adapting growth rates to environmental conditions, it is likely that TOR responds to a variety of stimuli, suggesting that many TOR control mechanisms remain to be uncovered. The Rag family of Ras-related small GTPases has recently been identified as a key component of the amino acid-sensing pathway, acting in parallel to Rheb (34, 58). Rag GTPases form heterodimers; RagA or RagB interacts with RagC or RagD. RagA and RagB are active when GTP bound, while RagC and RagD are active when bound to GDP (34, 58). Activation of the Rags by amino acids results in TOR relocalization to Rab7-containing vesicles (58). While the function of these vesicles in TORC1 signaling remains unclear, this relocalization is associated with increased TORC1 activity.TORC1 controls cell growth and translation through the phosphorylation and activation of components of the translational machinery, such as S6 kinase (S6K) and 4EBP1, an inhibitor of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) activity (reviewed in reference 27). S6K phosphorylates the S6 ribosomal subunit, thereby increasing translation. Mice deficient for S6K1 are small and have small pancreatic beta cells and a correspondingly low level of circulating insulin (45). Mutation of the phosphorylation sites on S6 results in a similar phenotype, with small beta cells and fibroblasts (57). In Drosophila, mutation of S6K again reduces both cell and organism size (42), as does the overexpression of 4EBP (41).Interestingly, while mutation of the TORC1 pathway in mammalian cells reduces cell size by 10 to 15%, ablation of core TORC1 pathway components in Drosophila cells can affect cell size by up to 40% (73). In an attempt to identify novel components of the TORC1 pathway, we undertook an RNA interference (RNAi)-based screen of Drosophila S2 cells. We reasoned that the extreme size phenotypes observed in Drosophila cells upon TORC1 manipulations would facilitate the identification of modulators. In order to increase the likelihood of isolating novel regulators of TOR, we uncoupled TOR activity from many of its known nutritional controls by depleting TSC2 and screened for double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) that could reverse the cell size increase elicited by loss of TSC2. Depletion of multiple components of the p38 pathway was found to revert the TSC2 RNAi-induced cell size increase. Furthermore, activation of p38 is necessary and sufficient for the activation of TOR. Strikingly, mutation of components of the stress-activated p38 pathway in Drosophila has a similar phenotype to mutations in the TOR and insulin signaling pathway: a cell-autonomous cell size decrease, reduced body size, and a sensitization to the effects of nutritional stress.     

Distinct requirements of Autophagy-related genes in programmed cell death

Although most programmed cell death (PCD) during animal development occurs by caspase-dependent apoptosis, autophagy-dependent cell death is also important in specific contexts. In previous studies, we established that PCD of the obsolete Drosophila larval midgut tissue is dependent on autophagy and can occur in the absence of the main components of the apoptotic pathway. As autophagy is primarily a survival mechanism in response to stress such as starvation, it is currently unclear if the regulation and mechanism of autophagy as a pro-death pathway is distinct to that as pro-survival. To establish the requirement of the components of the autophagy pathway during cell death, we examined the effect of systematically knocking down components of the autophagy machinery on autophagy induction and timing of midgut PCD. We found that there is a distinct requirement of the individual components of the autophagy pathway in a pro-death context. Furthermore, we show that TORC1 is upstream of autophagy induction in the midgut indicating that while the machinery may be distinct the activation may occur similarly in PCD and during starvation-induced autophagy signalling. Our data reveal that while autophagy initiation occurs similarly in different cellular contexts, there is a tissue/function-specific requirement for the components of the autophagic machinery.There is a fundamental requirement for multicellular organisms to remove excess, detrimental, obsolete and damaged cells by programmed cell death (PCD).^{1, 2} In the majority of cases caspase-dependent apoptosis is the principle pathway of PCD; however, there are other modes of cell death with important context-specific roles, such as autophagy.^{3, 4} Defects in autophagy have significant adverse consequences to normal cellular functions and contribute to the pathogenesis of numerous human diseases. This is particularly evident in cancer where depending on the context autophagy can have tumour-suppressing or -promoting roles. Given the number of clinical trials targeting autophagy in cancer therapy, it will be critically important to understand the context-specific regulation and functions of autophagy.⁵Autophagy is a highly conserved multi-step catabolic process characterised by the encapsulation of part of the cytoplasm inside a double-membrane vesicle called the autophagosome. Autophagosomes then fuse with lysosomes and the components are subsequently degraded by acidic lysosomal hydrolases.⁶ The process of autophagy can be functionally divided into four groups: (1) serine/threonine kinase Atg1 (ULK1 in mammals) complex and its regulators responsible for the induction of autophagy; (2) the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) complex, which involves Atg6 and functions in the nucleation of the autophagosome; (3) the Atg8 and Atg12 conjugation systems, which involves several Autophagy-related (Atg) proteins essential for the expansion of autophagosome; and (4) Atg9 and its associated proteins including Atg2 and Atg18, which aids the recycling of lipid and proteins.⁷ In addition, several of the Atg proteins can function in multiple steps. For example, Atg1 interacts with proteins with different functions (e.g. Atg8, Atg18 and others), suggesting that it is not only required for initiation but also participates in the formation of autophagosomes.⁸ It is yet to be fully established if the context-specific functions of autophagy have distinct requirements for select components of the autophagy pathway.High levels of autophagy are induced in response to stress, such as nutrient deprivation, intracellular stress, high temperature, high culture density, hormones and growth factor deprivation.^{9, 10} The target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway is a central mediator in regulating the response to nutrients and growth signalling. TOR functions in two distinct complexes, with regulatory associated protein of TOR (Raptor) in TOR complex 1 (TORC1) or with rapamycin insensitive companion of TOR (Rictor) in TOR complex 2 (TORC2).^{11, 12, 13, 14, 15} Of these, TORC1 regulates autophagy; in nutrient-rich conditions, TORC1 activity inhibits the Atg1 complex preventing autophagy and cellular stress such as starvation leads to inactivation of TORC1 promoting a dramatic increase in autophagy. TORC2 can also negatively regulate autophagy via the FoxO3 complex in specific context.¹⁶Most direct in vivo evidence for a role of autophagy in cell death has emerged from studies in Drosophila.⁵ Developmentally regulated removal of the Drosophila larval midgut can occur in the absence of canonical apoptosis pathway, whereas inhibiting autophagy delays the process.^{17, 18} Also, inhibition of autophagy leads to delayed degradation of larval salivary glands in Drosophila.¹⁹ Genetic studies have shown that many of the Atg genes known to be involved in starvation-induced autophagy in the Drosophila fat body are also involved in autophagy-dependent degradation of salivary glands and midgut.^{5, 20, 21} However, systematic studies to test whether starvation-induced autophagy and autophagy required for PCD require identical components have not been carried out, and there are some observations suggesting that there may be distinctions. For example, in Atg7-null mutants autophagy is perturbed but the larval–adult midgut transition proceeds normally.²² In addition, a novel Atg7- and Atg3-independent autophagy pathway is required for cell size reduction during midgut removal.²³ Here we show that downregulation of TORC1 activity is required for induction of autophagy during midgut removal. Surprisingly, however, the requirement of part of the autophagy machinery during midgut degradation was found to be distinct to that which is required during autophagy induced by starvation. We report that Atg genes required for autophagy initiation, Atg8a and recycling are all essential for autophagy-dependent midgut removal, whereas other components of the elongation and nucleation steps are not essential.     

ULK1��ATG13��FIP200 Complex Mediates mTOR Signaling and Is Essential for Autophagy

Autophagy is a degradative process that recycles long-lived and faulty cellular components. It is linked to many diseases and is required for normal development. ULK1, a mammalian serine/threonine protein kinase, plays a key role in the initial stages of autophagy, though the exact molecular mechanism is unknown. Here we report identification of a novel protein complex containing ULK1 and two additional protein factors, FIP200 and ATG13, all of which are essential for starvation-induced autophagy. Both FIP200 and ATG13 are critical for correct localization of ULK1 to the pre-autophagosome and stability of ULK1 protein. Additionally, we demonstrate by using both cellular experiments and a de novo in vitro reconstituted reaction that FIP200 and ATG13 can enhance ULK1 kinase activity individually but both are required for maximal stimulation. Further, we show that ATG13 and ULK1 are phosphorylated by the mTOR pathway in a nutrient starvation-regulated manner, indicating that the ULK1·ATG13·FIP200 complex acts as a node for integrating incoming autophagy signals into autophagosome biogenesis.Macroautophagy (herein referred to as autophagy) is a catabolic process whereby long-lived proteins and damaged organelles are shuttled to lysosomes for degradation. This process is conserved in all eukaryotes. Under normal growth conditions a housekeeping level of autophagy exists. Under stress, such as nutrient starvation, autophagy is strongly induced resulting in the engulfment of cytosolic components and organelles in specialized double-membrane structures termed autophagosomes. Following fusion of the outer autophagosomal membrane with lysosomes, the inner membrane and its cytoplasmic cargo are degraded and recycled (1–3). Recent work has implicated autophagy in many disease pathologies, including cancer, neurodegeneration, as well as in eliminating intracellular pathogens (4–8).The morphology of autophagy was first described in mammalian cells over 50 years ago (9). However, it is only recently through yeast genetic screens, that multiple autophagy-related (ATG) genes have been identified (10–12). The yeast ATG proteins have been classified into four major groups: the Atg1 protein kinase complex, the Vps34 phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate kinase complex, the Atg8/Atg12 conjugation systems, and the Atg9 recycling complex (13). Even though many ATG genes are now known, most of which have functional homologs in mammalian cells (14, 15), the molecular mechanism by which they sense the initial triggers and subsequently dictate autophagy-specific intracellular membrane events is far from understood.In yeast, one of the earliest autophagy-specific events is believed to involve the Atg1 protein kinase complex. Atg1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase and a key autophagy-regulator (16). Atg1 is complexed to at least two other proteins during autophagy, Atg13 and Atg17, both of which are required for normal Atg1 function and autophagosome generation (17–19). Classical signaling pathways such as the cAMP-dependent kinase (PKA) pathway or the Tor kinase pathway appear to converge upon this complex, placing Atg1 at an early stage during autophagosome biogenesis (20–22). Atg1 phosphorylation by PKA blocks its association with the forming autophagosome (21), while the Tor pathway hyperphosphorylates Atg13 causing a reduced affinity of Atg13 for Atg1, resulting in repression of autophagy (17, 19). In contrast, nutrient starvation or inhibition of Tor leads to dephosphorylation of Atg13 thus increased Atg1 complex formation and kinase activity, resulting in stimulation of autophagy (19). Surprisingly, the physiological substrates of Atg1 kinase have not been identified; thus how Atg1 transduces upstream autophagic signaling is undefined. Recently, mammalian homologs of Atg1 have been identified as ULK1 and ULK2 (Unc-51-like kinase)² (23–25). ULK1 and ULK2 are ubiquitously expressed and localize to the isolation membrane, or forming autophagosome, upon nutrient starvation (25); RNAi-mediated depletion of ULK1 in HEK293 cells compromises autophagy (23, 24). The exact role of ULK1 versus ULK2 in autophagy is unclear, and it is possible some redundancy exists between the two isoforms (26).Given the conservation of autophagy from yeast to man, it is interesting to note that no mammalian counterpart to yeast Atg13 or Atg17 had been identified until very recently. The protein FIP200 (focal adhesion kinase family-interacting protein of 200 kDa) was identified as an autophagy-essential binding partner of both ULK1 and ULK2 (25), and it has been speculated that FIP200 might be the equivalent of yeast Atg17, despite low sequence similarity (25, 27).In this study, we delve deeper into the molecular regulation of ULK1 to gain a better insight into how mammalian signaling pathways affect autophagy initiation. We describe here the identification of a triple complex consisting of ULK1, FIP200, and the mammalian equivalent of Atg13. This complex is required not only for localization of ULK1 to the isolation membrane but also for maximal kinase activity. In addition, both ATG13 and ULK1 are kinase substrates in the mTOR pathway and thus might function to sense nutrient starvation. Therefore, this study defines the role of mammalian ULK1-ATG13-FIP200 complex in mediating the initial autophagic triggers and to transduce the signal to the core autophagic machinery.     

Coxsackievirus Infection Induces Autophagy-Like Vesicles and Megaphagosomes in Pancreatic Acinar Cells In Vivo

Autophagy can play an important part in protecting host cells during virus infection, and several viruses have developed strategies by which to evade or even exploit this homeostatic pathway. Tissue culture studies have shown that poliovirus, an enterovirus, modulates autophagy. Herein, we report on in vivo studies that evaluate the effects on autophagy of coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3). We show that in pancreatic acinar cells, CVB3 induces the formation of abundant small autophagy-like vesicles and permits amphisome formation. However, the virus markedly, albeit incompletely, limits the fusion of autophagosomes (and/or amphisomes) with lysosomes, and, perhaps as a result, very large autophagy-related structures are formed within infected cells; we term these structures megaphagosomes. Ultrastructural analyses confirmed that double-membraned autophagy-like vesicles were present in infected pancreatic tissue and that the megaphagosomes were related to the autophagy pathway; they also revealed a highly organized lattice, the individual components of which are of a size consistent with CVB RNA polymerase; we suggest that this may represent a coxsackievirus replication complex. Thus, these in vivo studies demonstrate that CVB3 infection dramatically modifies autophagy in infected pancreatic acinar cells.Macroautophagy—henceforth referred to as autophagy—is an intracellular process that is important for cellular differentiation, homeostasis, and survival. Through autophagy, long-lived cytosolic proteins and organelles become encapsulated within double-membraned vesicles, called autophagosomes, which fuse with lysosomes to facilitate degradation of protein and cellular organelles and to promote nutrient recycling/regeneration. Autophagy plays a key role in the host immune response to infection by viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites (reviewed in references 10 and 62). Within virus-infected cells, whole virions and/or viral proteins and nucleic acids are captured inside autophagosomes and degraded (following lysosomal fusion) through the process of xenophagy. Moreover, autophagosome fusion with the endosomal/lysosomal pathway facilitates Toll-like receptor recognition of viral materials and delivers endogenous cytosolic viral proteins to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II antigen presentation pathway, which in turn may help to trigger activation of innate immunity (and type I interferon production) and promote antigen presentation to virus-specific CD4⁺ T cells (reviewed in references 9, 41, 44, 47, 72, and 90). A recent study has shown that autophagy is also involved in the processing and presentation of MHC class I-restricted viral epitopes (13).Given the importance of autophagy in antiviral immunity, it is perhaps not surprising that viruses have evolved mechanisms to evade and/or subvert this pathway (reviewed in references 9, 11, 14, 35, 37, 60, 61, and 77). Several members of the herpesvirus family, most notably herpes simplex virus type 1, inhibit autophagy within an infected cell and encode proteins that block and/or target intracellular signaling pathways that regulate autophagy (reviewed in references 60 and 61). However, some viruses not only evade autophagy but also appear to take advantage of the process; several RNA viruses induce autophagy and exploit the pathway during their replication (1, 12, 15, 31, 40, 43, 76, 93, 96). Viruses belonging to the Picornaviridae family and the Nidovirales order replicate their genomes on double-membraned vesicles that resemble autophagosomes; these vesicles are notably smaller in size than cellular autophagosomes and are decorated with proteins derived from the autophagic pathway (19, 21, 31, 37, 67, 68, 71, 92). Viral proteins encoded by poliovirus and equine arterivirus can trigger the formation of these autophagy-like vesicles (79, 80), and the expression of a single poliovirus protein, 2BC, is sufficient to induce lipidation of the host autophagy protein light chain 3 (LC3), encoded by the Atg8 gene (87). Taken together, these studies suggest that some viruses subvert the autophagy pathway to generate double-membraned vesicles that provide a surface for RNA replication (8, 37, 88). In addition, these vesicles may permit newly formed virions to escape from infected cells via a nonlytic route (36, 85).Although studies have demonstrated that the autophagic pathway may play an important role in virus infection in vitro, either to promote or to restrict viral replication, we are just beginning to appreciate and understand the function and effects of autophagy for virus infections in vivo. Autophagy acts in an antiviral fashion to limit tobacco mosaic virus replication and programmed cell death in plants (46), to prevent a pathogenic infection with vesicular stomatitis virus in flies (73), and to protect against fatal encephalitis in Sindbis virus- or herpes simplex virus type 1-infected mice (45, 59, 63). Nonetheless, to date there is a dearth of in vivo studies; animal models of virus infection are needed in order to better define the antiviral role of autophagy in vivo (41, 62). In addition, studies that address the role of viral subversion of autophagy in vivo are warranted. Does this process occur within infected animals, and is it required for viral replication in particular cell types or for viral pathogenesis? Recent studies have shown that autophagy not only promotes the replication of hepatitis B virus and enterovirus 71 in vitro but also may be induced by infection in vivo, potentially to benefit the virus rather than the host (28, 78).Type B coxsackieviruses (CVBs) are members of the Picornaviridae family and Enterovirus genus and, as such, are closely related to polioviruses. CVBs are important human pathogens that often induce severe acute and chronic diseases and cause morbidity and mortality (69, 91). CVBs are the most common cause of infectious myocarditis (38, 82) and frequently trigger pancreatitis and aseptic meningitis (7, 16, 29, 51). Tissue culture studies (93) have shown that CVB type 3 (CVB3) promotes LC3 conversion and autophagosome accumulation in virus-infected cells in vitro and that modulation of the autophagic pathway (using chemicals or small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown) to enhance or dampen autophagy results in an increase and a decrease, respectively, in viral protein expression and/or viral titers; however, the reported changes in viral titers were modest (2- to 4-fold). In the present study, we examine whether CVB3 activates the autophagic pathway in vivo, specifically in pancreatic acinar cells, which are a natural primary target for this virus. Using a mouse model of CVB3 infection, which faithfully recapitulates most aspects of CVB disease in humans, we demonstrate that this virus triggers LC3 conversion and also modulates other components of the autophagy machinery. In addition, using a recombinant CVB3 (rCVB3) that expresses Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein (DsRed-CVB3), we identify virus-infected cells in situ and show that CVB3 infection increases autophagosome abundance in vivo. Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP-1) immunostaining confirmed that amphisomes are generated in virus-infected cells but that autophagic flux was not substantially enhanced as the infection progressed; rather, there appears to be a substantial blockade in fusion with lysosomes. Finally, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) ultrastructural analysis of the infected pancreas confirmed that double-membraned autophagy-like vesicles as well as very large autophagic compartments (for which we have coined the term “megaphagosomes”) were generated in acinar cells following virus infection. Overall, these data provide compelling evidence that CVB3 induces autophagy in vivo and suggest that this picornavirus may subvert this process in a mammalian host.     

Mutation of the Rb1 Pathway Leads to Overexpression of mTor,Constitutive Phosphorylation of Akt on Serine 473, Resistance to Anoikis,and a Block in c-Raf Activation

Atk can be activated by two independent phosphorylation events. Growth factor-dependent phosphorylation of threonine 308 (Akt-308) by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent PDK1 leads to activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTor) complex 1 (TORC1) and stimulation of protein synthesis. Phosphorylation on serine 473 (Akt-473) is catalyzed by mTor in a second complex (TORC2), and Akt-473 phosphorylates Foxo3a to inhibit apoptosis. Accumulation of both phosphorylated forms of Akt is frequent in cancer, and TORC2 activity is required for progression to prostate cancer with Pten mutation. Here, we link Akt-473 to the Rb1 pathway and show that mTor is overexpressed with loss of the Rb1 family pathway. This leads to constitutive Akt-473 and, in turn, phosphorylation of Foxo3a and resistance to cell adhesion-dependent apoptosis (anoikis). Additionally, Akt-473 accumulation blocks c-Raf activation, thereby preventing downstream Erk activation. This block cannot be overcome by constitutively active Ras, and it also prevents induction of the Arf tumor suppressor by Ras. These studies link inactivation of the Rb1 pathway, a hallmark of cancer, to accumulation of Akt-473, resistance to anoikis, and a block in c-Raf/Erk activation.Binding of growth factors to their cell surface receptors activates the Ras family of GTP-binding proteins, which in turn classically activates a cell proliferation signaling cascade, including c-Raf and Erk (27, 28). Mutations leading to constitutive Ras activation are among the most frequently found in cancer, highlighting the importance of this pathway in cancer initiation. Ras can also activate phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), which in turn leads to phosphorylation and activation of Akt (reviewed in reference 20). Akt activation can also stimulate cell proliferation by controlling the expression and subcellular localization of cell cycle regulators, such as cyclin D1 and p27Kip1, and it can regulate protein synthesis by controlling the activity of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTor) complex 1 (TORC1); inhibit apoptosis by controlling the subcellular localization of Foxo3a, which transactivates proapoptotic genes; and change cell shape and motility through regulation of the Rac-Rho-Ccd42 pathway (2). Constitutively active Akt is oncogenic, and activated Akt frequently accumulates in cancer cells (9, 22, 29, 38). As opposed to acting in concert, these two Ras-activated pathways appear to function separately or even antagonistically in at least some cells, because Akt can block activation of c-Raf, which in turn prevents Erk activation (20). Indeed, recent results suggest that the two pathways may function sequentially during tumor progression. While Ras-mediated activation of the MAP kinase/Erk pathway is important in tumor initiation, as tumorigenesis progresses, the major role of Ras activation may become the PI3K/Akt pathway (22).Akt is phosphorylated by two different kinases. PDK1 is activated via PI3K in response to growth factors, and it phosphorylates Akt on threonine 308 in the A loop (Akt-308) (1). The Pten phosphatase is negatively related to PI3K activity, and mutations in Pten are common in cancer (4). Akt-308 phosphorylates TSC2, thereby blocking the GAP activity of TSC1/TSC2 toward Rheb, whose GTPase activity is required for TORC1 function. mTor, in the context of TORC1, phosphorylates and activates the AGC kinase family member S6 to regulate protein synthesis, thereby linking growth factor stimulation to protein synthesis (5, 14, 36). Mutations in Ras and Pten are mutually exclusive in some tumors, and lack of Erk activation is an adverse prognostic factor in melanoma (4, 19, 21, 26, 38). Taken together, these results suggest that activation of PI3K and, in turn, Akt is a critical function of Ras mutation in some tumors.mTor forms a second complex (TORC2) with Sin1, Rictor, and mLST8 (24, 30), and mTor in the context of TORC2 phosphorylates Akt (which, like S6, is also an AGC family member) on serine 473 in the hydrophobic motif (11, 18, 32, 37). Knocking out components of TORC2 prevents Akt-473 without affecting Akt-308 (11, 18, 32, 37). Thus, Akt-473 and Akt-308 can be independently catalyzed. TORC2 also phosphorylates Akt and another AGC family member, protein kinase C, on the turn motif, and this phosphorylation is important for protein folding/stability (8, 17).Akt-308 and Akt-473 appear to be directed at distinct cellular pathways. Akt-308 is essential for regulation of TORC1 and thus protein synthesis, whereas Akt-473 is important for phosphorylation of Foxo3a and prevention of its translocation to the nucleus, where it activates apoptotic genes (16, 18). Accordingly, Akt-473 is associated with resistance of cells to stress and to anoikis (survival in the absence of normal matrix contact) (10). Although Akt-473 has been associated with cytoskeletal changes, no obvious effect of loss of TORC2 components and thus Akt-473 on the actin cytoskeleton or on cell proliferation was seen in culture (18), suggesting that these activities may be linked to Akt-308. Both Akt-308 and Akt-473 frequently accumulate in cancer cells, consistent with increased proliferation and protein synthesis and increased motility and survival as cells lose their normal matrix contacts in the forming tumor and during metastasis (9, 29). Such accumulation of Akt-308 can be facilitated by mutations, such as Ras, leading to constitutive activation of growth factor signaling or to mutation or epigenetic silencing of the Pten phosphatase, which inhibits PI3K activity (4, 9). However, less is known about how TORC2 is regulated or why Akt-473 accumulates in cancer.One target of the increase in cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) activity resulting from Erk-dependent induction of genes such as the one encoding cyclin D1 is the Rb1 pathway, whose family members are hyperphosphorylated and inactivated by the resulting accumulation of cdk activity (13, 25). While Rb1 is mutated in some cancers (e.g., retinoblastoma, small-cell lung cancer, and osteosarcoma), more frequently the pathway, including all three Rb1 family members, is inactivated through hyperphosphorylation resulting from mutation or epigenetic silencing of a cdk inhibitor (13). Interestingly, mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) mutated for only one of the three family members, Rb1, no longer require Erk signaling for proliferation in culture, but they do require Akt activity (6). Additionally, expression of the adenoviral oncoprotein E1a in cells blocks Erk activation, and this effect was eliminated with a point mutation in E1a that prevented its binding and by inhibition of the Rb1 family (3). These results suggest that even partial inactivation of the Rb1 pathway (e.g., mutation of Rb1) eliminates a requirement for Erk signaling, but further, the Rb1 pathway seems to be required for cells to activate Erk. As a model for Rb1 pathway inactivation in cancer, we examined the effects of mutation of the three Rb1 family members on Akt and Erk signaling pathways in MEFs.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Roles of Minor Pilin Subunits Spy0125 and Spy0130 in the Serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes Strain SF370

Adhesive pili on the surface of the serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes strain SF370 are composed of a major backbone subunit (Spy0128) and two minor subunits (Spy0125 and Spy0130), joined covalently by a pilin polymerase (Spy0129). Previous studies using recombinant proteins showed that both minor subunits bind to human pharyngeal (Detroit) cells (A. G. Manetti et al., Mol. Microbiol. 64:968-983, 2007), suggesting both may act as pilus-presented adhesins. While confirming these binding properties, studies described here indicate that Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role as a wall linker. Pili were localized predominantly to cell wall fractions of the wild-type S. pyogenes parent strain and a spy0125 deletion mutant. In contrast, they were found almost exclusively in culture supernatants in both spy0130 and srtA deletion mutants, indicating that the housekeeping sortase (SrtA) attaches pili to the cell wall by using Spy0130 as a linker protein. Adhesion assays with antisera specific for individual subunits showed that only anti-rSpy0125 serum inhibited adhesion of wild-type S. pyogenes to human keratinocytes and tonsil epithelium to a significant extent. Spy0125 was localized to the tip of pili, based on a combination of mutant analysis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of purified pili. Assays comparing parent and mutant strains confirmed its role as the adhesin. Unexpectedly, apparent spontaneous cleavage of a labile, proline-rich (8 of 14 residues) sequence separating the N-terminal ∼1/3 and C-terminal ∼2/3 of Spy0125 leads to loss of the N-terminal region, but analysis of internal spy0125 deletion mutants confirmed that this has no significant effect on adhesion.The group A Streptococcus (S. pyogenes) is an exclusively human pathogen that commonly colonizes either the pharynx or skin, where local spread can give rise to various inflammatory conditions such as pharyngitis, tonsillitis, sinusitis, or erysipelas. Although often mild and self-limiting, GAS infections are occasionally very severe and sometimes lead to life-threatening diseases, such as necrotizing fasciitis or streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. A wide variety of cell surface components and extracellular products have been shown or suggested to play important roles in S. pyogenes virulence, including cell surface pili (1, 6, 32). Pili expressed by the serotype M1 S. pyogenes strain SF370 mediate specific adhesion to intact human tonsil epithelia and to primary human keratinocytes, as well as cultured keratinocyte-derived HaCaT cells, but not to Hep-2 or A549 cells (1). They also contribute to adhesion to a human pharyngeal cell line (Detroit cells) and to biofilm formation (29).Over the past 5 years, pili have been discovered on an increasing number of important Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including Bacillus cereus (4), Bacillus anthracis (4, 5), Corynebacterium diphtheriae (13, 14, 19, 26, 27, 44, 46, 47), Streptococcus agalactiae (7, 23, 38), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (2, 3, 24, 25, 34), as well as S. pyogenes (1, 29, 32). All these species produce pili that are composed of a single major subunit plus either one or two minor subunits. During assembly, the individual subunits are covalently linked to each other via intermolecular isopeptide bonds, catalyzed by specialized membrane-associated transpeptidases that may be described as pilin polymerases (4, 7, 25, 41, 44, 46). These are related to the classical housekeeping sortase (usually, but not always, designated SrtA) that is responsible for anchoring many proteins to Gram-positive bacterial cell walls (30, 31, 33). The C-terminal ends of sortase target proteins include a cell wall sorting (CWS) motif consisting, in most cases, of Leu-Pro-X-Thr-Gly (LPXTG, where X can be any amino acid) (11, 40). Sortases cleave this substrate between the Thr and Gly residues and produce an intermolecular isopeptide bond linking the Thr to a free amino group provided by a specific target. In attaching proteins to the cell wall, the target amino group is provided by the lipid II peptidoglycan precursor (30, 36, 40). In joining pilus subunits, the target is the ɛ-amino group in the side chain of a specific Lys residue in the second subunit (14, 18, 19). Current models of pilus biogenesis envisage repeated transpeptidation reactions adding additional subunits to the base of the growing pilus, until the terminal subunit is eventually linked covalently via an intermolecular isopeptide bond to the cell wall (28, 41, 45).The major subunit (sometimes called the backbone or shaft subunit) extends along the length of the pilus and appears to play a structural role, while minor subunits have been detected either at the tip, the base, and/or at occasional intervals along the shaft, depending on the species (4, 23, 24, 32, 47). In S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae one of the minor subunits acts as an adhesin, while the second appears to act as a linker between the base of the assembled pilus and the cell wall (7, 15, 22, 34, 35). It was originally suggested that both minor subunits of C. diphtheriae pili could act as adhesins (27). However, recent data showed one of these has a wall linker role (26, 44) and may therefore not function as an adhesin.S. pyogenes strain SF370 pili are composed of a major (backbone) subunit, termed Spy0128, plus two minor subunits, called Spy0125 and Spy0130 (1, 32). All three are required for efficient adhesion to target cells (1). Studies employing purified recombinant proteins have shown that both of the minor subunits, but not the major subunit, bind to Detroit cells (29), suggesting both might act as pilus-presented adhesins. Here we report studies employing a combination of recombinant proteins, specific antisera, and allelic replacement mutants which show that only Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role in linking pili to the cell wall.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Preinfection Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Failed To Prevent HIV Type 1 Infection from Strains Genetically Unrelated to Viruses in Long-Term Exposed Partners

Understanding the mechanisms underlying potential altered susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in highly exposed seronegative (ES) individuals and the later clinical consequences of breakthrough infection can provide insight into strategies to control HIV-1 with an effective vaccine. From our Seattle ES cohort, we identified one individual (LSC63) who seroconverted after over 2 years of repeated unprotected sexual contact with his HIV-1-infected partner (P63) and other sexual partners of unknown HIV-1 serostatus. The HIV-1 variants infecting LSC63 were genetically unrelated to those sequenced from P63. This may not be surprising, since viral load measurements in P63 were repeatedly below 50 copies/ml, making him an unlikely transmitter. However, broad HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses were detected in LSC63 before seroconversion. Compared to those detected after seroconversion, these responses were of lower magnitude and half of them targeted different regions of the viral proteome. Strong HLA-B27-restricted CTLs, which have been associated with disease control, were detected in LSC63 after but not before seroconversion. Furthermore, for the majority of the protein-coding regions of the HIV-1 variants in LSC63 (except gp41, nef, and the 3′ half of pol), the genetic distances between the infecting viruses and the viruses to which he was exposed through P63 (termed the exposed virus) were comparable to the distances between random subtype B HIV-1 sequences and the exposed viruses. These results suggest that broad preinfection immune responses were not able to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection in LSC63, even though the infecting viruses were not particularly distant from the viruses that may have elicited these responses.Understanding the mechanisms of altered susceptibility or control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in highly exposed seronegative (ES) persons may provide invaluable information aiding the design of HIV-1 vaccines and therapy (9, 14, 15, 33, 45, 57, 58). In a cohort of female commercial sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya, a small proportion of individuals remained seronegative for over 3 years despite the continued practice of unprotected sex (12, 28, 55, 56). Similarly, resistance to HIV-1 infection has been reported in homosexual men who frequently practiced unprotected sex with infected partners (1, 15, 17, 21, 61). Multiple factors have been associated with the resistance to HIV-1 infection in ES individuals (32), including host genetic factors (8, 16, 20, 37-39, 44, 46, 47, 49, 59, 63), such as certain HLA class I and II alleles (41), as well as cellular (1, 15, 26, 55, 56), humoral (25, 29), and innate immune responses (22, 35).Seroconversion in previously HIV-resistant Nairobi female commercial sex workers, despite preexisting HIV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses, has been reported (27). Similarly, 13 of 125 ES enrollees in our Seattle ES cohort (1, 15, 17) have become late seroconverters (H. Zhu, T. Andrus, Y. Liu, and T. Zhu, unpublished observations). Here, we analyze the virology, genetics, and immune responses of HIV-1 infection in one of the later seroconverting subjects, LSC63, who had developed broad CTL responses before seroconversion.