动物bHLH转录因子家族成员及其功能

bHLH转录因子在真核生物生长发育调控过程中具有重要作用。动物bHLH转录因子包含45个家族, 分别参与调控神经元发生、肌细胞生成、肠组织发育以及环境毒素响应等生物学过程。过去20年里, 研究人员对动物bHLH家族成员鉴定及其生物学功能开展了广泛的研究。文章在介绍动物45个bHLH家族名称来源的基础上, 综述了小鼠、果蝇和线虫3种模式动物bHLH家族成员及其功能的研究进展。小鼠、果蝇和线虫中分别有114、59和42种bHLH蛋白。其中, 小鼠108种、果蝇47种和线虫20种bHLH蛋白的功能已比较明确, 功能未知的22种线虫bHLH蛋白中还有15种尚未归入相应家族。文章也对部分被误用的bHLH家族成员名称做了说明, 可为相关研究人员深入开展bHLH转录因子结构与功能的研究提供较为清晰和系统的背景资料。     

bHLH转录因子家族研究进展

bHLH转录因子在真核生物生长发育调控中具有重要作用, 它们组成了转录因子的一个大家族。已经有20种生物基因组中bHLH家族的成员得到鉴定, 其中动物17种、植物2种、酵母1种。动物bHLH因其调控基因表达的功能不同而被分成45个家族; 此外, 根据它们所作用DNA元件和自身结构特点又被分成6个组。A组包含22个家族, 主要调控神经细胞生成、肌细胞生成和中胚层形成; B组包含12个家族, 主要调控细胞增殖与分化、固醇代谢与脂肪细胞形成以及葡萄糖响应基因的表达; C组包含7个家族, 主要负责调控中线与气管发育和昼夜节律、激活环境毒素响应基因的转录; D组只有1个家族, 它与A组bHLH蛋白形成无活性的异源二聚体; E组有2个家族, 调控胚胎分节、体节形成与器官发生等; F组也只有1个家族, 调控头部发育、嗅觉神经元生成等。文章综述了bHLH转录因子家族分类、起源、功能方面的研究进展情况。     

Functional Diversity of Xyloglucan-Related Proteins and its Implications in the Cell Wall Dynamics in Plants

Abstract: The plant cell wall is a dynamic apparatus responsible for both morphogenesis and responsiveness to environmental conditions. In the cell wall of most seed plants, cellulose microfibrils are cross-linked by xyloglucans to form a cellulose/xyloglucan framework, which functions as the mechanical underpinning of the cell wall. Endoxyloglucan transferases are a class of enzymes that play a central role in construction and modification of the plant cell wall. These enzymes are encoded by a large multi-gene family termed xyloglucan-related proteins (XRPs). More than 24 members of the XRP family have so far been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana. Each member of this family functions as either a hydrolase or a transferase acting on xyloglucans. The primary structures of proteins and gene-expression profiles have strongly suggested their potentially divergent roles in plant morphogenesis: different members of this family are expressed in different types of tissues at distinct developmental stages and respond differentially to individual hormones as well as environmental stimuli. These facts imply that each member of this gene family is individually committed to a specific process that proceeds in a specific tissue at a specific stage of development. Probably the generation and maintenance of the cell walls in a whole organ, and thus in the whole plant, is achieved by the ensemble of individual members of the XRP family.     

Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor gene family phylogenetics and nomenclature

A phylogenetic analysis of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) gene superfamily was performed using seven different species (human, mouse, rat, worm, fly, yeast, and plant Arabidopsis) and involving over 600 bHLH genes ( Stevens et al., 2008). All bHLH genes were identified in the genomes of the various species, including expressed sequence tags, and the entire coding sequence was used in the analysis. Nearly 15% of the gene family has been updated or added since the original publication. A super-tree involving six clades and all structural relationships was established and is now presented for four of the species. The wealth of functional data available for members of the bHLH gene superfamily provides us with the opportunity to use this exhaustive phylogenetic tree to predict potential functions of uncharacterized members of the family. This phylogenetic and genomic analysis of the bHLH gene family has revealed unique elements of the evolution and functional relationships of the different genes in the bHLH gene family.     

Analysis of IIId, IIIe and IVa group basic-helix-loop-helix proteins expressed in Arabidopsis root epidermis

Differentiation of Arabidopsis epidermal cells into root hairs and trichomes is a functional model system for understanding plant cell development. Previous studies showed that one of the Arabidopsis basic-helix-loop-helix (AtbHLH) proteins, GLABRA3 (GL3), is involved in root-hair and trichome differentiation. We analyzed 11 additional AtbHLH genes with homology to GL3. Estimation of the phylogeny based on amino acid sequences of the bHLH region suggests that 11 AtbHLH genes used in this study evolved by duplications of a single common GL3 ancestor. Promoter-GUS analysis showed that AtbHLH006, AtbHLH013, AtbHLH017 and AtbHLH020 were expressed in roots. Among them, AtbHLH006 and AtbHLH020 were preferentially expressed in root epidermal non-hair cells. Consistent with the expression patterns from promoter-GUS analysis, GFP fluorescence was observed in the nuclei of root epidermal non-hair cells of AtbHLH006p::AtbHLH006:GFP and AtbHLH020p::AtbHLH020:GFP transgenic plants. However, AtbHLH006 and AtbHLH0020 proteins did not interact with epidermis-specific MYB proteins and TTG1. Taken together, AtbHLH006 and AtbHLH020 may function in root epidermal cells, but other GL3-like bHLH proteins may have evolved to regulate different processes.     

Six family genes--structure and function as transcription factors and their roles in development

The members of the Six gene family were identified as homologues of Drosophila sine oculis which is essential for compound-eye formation. The Six proteins are characterized by the Six domain and the Six-type homeodomain, both of which are essential for specific DNA binding and for cooperative interactions with Eya proteins. Mammals possess six Six genes which can be subdivided into three subclasses, and mutations of Six genes have been identified in human genetic disorders. Characterization of Six genes from various animal phyla revealed the antiquity of this gene family and roles of its members in several different developmental contexts. Some members retain conserved roles as components of the Pax-Six-Eya-Dach regulatory network, which may have been established in the common ancestor of all bilaterians as a toolbox controlling cell proliferation and cell movement during embryogenesis. Gene duplications and cis-regulatory changes may have provided a basis for diverse functions of Six genes in different animal lineages.     

Phylogenetic and expression analysis of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor gene family: genomic approach to cellular differentiation

A phylogenetic analysis of seven different species (human, mouse, rat, worm, fly, yeast, and plant) utilizing all (541) basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) genes identified, including expressed sequence tags (EST), was performed. A super-tree involving six clades and a structural categorization involving the entire coding sequence was established. A nomenclature was developed based on clade distribution to discuss the functional and ancestral relationships of all the genes. The position/location of specific genes on the phylogenetic tree in relation to known bHLH factors allows for predictions of the potential functions of uncharacterized bHLH factors, including EST's. A genomic analysis using microarrays for four different mouse cell types (i.e. Sertoli, Schwann, thymic, and muscle) was performed and considered all known bHLH family members on the microarray for comparison. Cell-specific groups of bHLH genes helped clarify those bHLH genes potentially involved in cell specific differentiation. This phylogenetic and genomic analysis of the bHLH gene family has revealed unique aspects of the evolution and functional relationships of the different genes in the bHLH gene family.     

A genome-wide survey on basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors in rat and mouse

The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins play essential roles in a wide range of developmental processes in higher organisms. bHLH family members have been identified in over 20 organisms, including nematode, fruit fly, and human. Our study identified 114 rat and 14 additional mouse bHLH members in rat and mouse genomes, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that both rat and mouse had 49, 26, 15, 4, 12, and 4 bHLH members in groups A, B, C, D, E, and F, respectively. Only the rat Mxi1 gene has two copies in the genome. All other rat bHLH genes and all mouse bHLH genes are single-copy genes. The chromosomal distribution pattern of mouse, rat, and human bHLH genes suggests the emergence of some bHLH genes through gene duplication, which probably happened at least before the divergence of vertebrates from invertebrates. The present study provides useful information for future studies using rat as a model animal for mammalian development. X. Zheng and Y. Wang are jointly first authors. An erratum to this article can be found at