Membrane anchoring of heparan sulfate proteoglycans by phosphatidylinositol and kinetics of synthesis of peripheral and detergent-solubilized proteoglycans in Schwann cells

Previous studies have shown that Schwann cells synthesize both peripheral and integral hydrophobic cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). The experiments reported here were undertaken to investigate the mode of attachment of these proteins to the cell surface and their potential interrelationship. The binding of the hydrophobic HSPGs to membranes appears to be via covalently linked phosphatidylinositol based on the observation that incubation of the detergent-solubilized protein with purified phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C significantly reduces the ability of the HSPGs to associate with phospholipid vesicles in a reconstitution assay. The peripherally associated HSPGs were released from the cells by incubation in the presence of heparin (10 mg/ml), 10 mM phytic acid (inositol hexaphosphate), or 2 M NaCl. These treatments also solubilized basement membrane HSPGs synthesized by the Schwann cells. These data suggest that the peripheral HSPGs are bound to the surface by electrostatic interactions. The peripheral and hydrophobic HSPGs were identical in overall size, net charge, length of glycosaminoglycan chains, and patterns of N-sulfation. To determine whether the peripheral HSPGs were derived from the membrane-bound form by cleavage of the membrane anchor, we examined the kinetics of synthesis and degradation of the two forms of HSPGs. The results obtained indicated the existence of two pools of detergent-solubilized HSPG with fast (t1/2 = 6 h) and slow (t1/2 = 55 h) turnover kinetics. The data were consistent with a model in which the peripheral HSPGs were derived from the slowly turning over pool of detergent-solubilized HSPGs.     

Heparin increases the infectivity of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 independent of cell surface proteoglycans and induces L1 epitope exposure

Human Papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the etiological agents of cervical cancer, and HPV‐16 is the most prevalent type. Several HPVs require heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) for cell binding. Here, we analyse the phenomenon that preincubation of HPV‐16 with increasing concentrations of heparin results in partial restoration rather than more efficient inhibition of infection. While corroborating that the HSPGs are cell‐binding receptors for HPV‐16, heparin‐preincubated virus bound to the extracellular matrix (ECM) via laminin‐332. Furthermore, the interaction of virions with heparin, a representative of the highly sulfated S‐domains of heparan sulfate (HS) chains of HSPGs, allowed HPV‐16 infection in the absence of cell surface HSPGs. Therefore, we concluded that specific glycan moieties but not specific HSPG protein backbones are required for infection. The increased binding of an epitope‐specific antibody to the viral capsid after heparin binding suggested that initial conformational changes in the HPV‐16 virion occur during infection by interaction with‘heparin‐like’ domains of cellular HSPGs. We propose that HS sequences with specific sulfation patterns are required to facilitate HPV‐16 infection.     

Identification of a lipid-anchored heparan sulfate proteoglycan in Schwann cells

Schwann cells synthesize both hydrophobic and peripheral cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). Previous analysis of the kinetics of radiolabeling suggested the peripheral HSPGs are derived from the membrane-anchored forms (Carey, D., and D. Evans. 1989. J. Cell Biol. 108:1891-1897). Peripheral cell surface HSPGs were purified from phytic acid extracts of cultured neonatal rat sciatic nerve Schwann cells by anion exchange, gel filtration, and laminin-affinity chromatography. Approximately 250 micrograms of HSPG protein was obtained from 2 X 10(9) cells with an estimated recovery of 23% and an overall purification of approximately 2000-fold. SDS-PAGE analysis indicated the absence of non-HSPG proteins in the purified material. Analysis of heparinase digestion products revealed the presence of at least six core protein species ranging in molecular weight from 57,000 to 185,000. The purified HSPGs were used to produce polyclonal antisera in rabbits. The antisera immunoprecipitated a subpopulation of 35SO4- labeled HSPGs that were released from Schwann cells by incubation in medium containing phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI- PLC); smaller amounts of immunoprecipated HSPGs were also present in phytic acid extracts. In the presence of excess unlabeled PI-PLC- released proteins, immunoprecipitation of phytic acid-solubilized HSPGs was inhibited. SDS-PAGE analysis of proteins immunoprecipitated from extracts of [35S]methionine labeled Schwann cells demonstrated that the antisera precipitated an HSPG species that was present in the pool of proteins released by PI-PLC, with smaller amounts present in phytic acid extracts. Nitrous acid degradation of the immunoprecipitated proteins produced a single 67,000-Mr core protein. When used for indirect immunofluorescence labeling, the antisera stained the external surface of cultured Schwann cells. Preincubation of the cultures in medium containing PI-PLC but not phytic acid significantly reduced the cell surface staining. The antisera stained the outer ring of Schwann cell membrane in sections of adult rat sciatic nerve but did not stain myelin or axonal membranes. This localization suggests the HSPG may play a role in binding the Schwann cell plasma membrane to the adjacent basement membrane surrounding the individual axon-Schwann cell units.     

Repression of myogenic differentiation by aFGF, bFGF, and K-FGF is dependent on cellular heparan sulfate

We have proposed a model in which fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling requires the interaction of FGF with at least two FGF receptors, a heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) and a tyrosine kinase. Since FGF may be a key mediator of skeletal muscle differentiation, we examined the synthesis of glycosaminoglycans in MM14 skeletal muscle myoblasts and their participation in FGF signalling. Proliferating and differentiated MM14 cells exhibit similar levels of HSPG, while differentiated cells exhibit reduced levels of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans and heparan sulfate chains. HSPGs, including syndecan, present in proliferating cells bind bFGF, while the majority of chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate chains do not. Treatment of skeletal muscle cells with chlorate, a reversible inhibitor of glycosaminoglycan sulfation, was used to examine the requirement of sulfated proteoglycans for FGF signalling. Chlorate treatment reduced glycosaminoglycan sulfation by 90% and binding of FGF to high affinity sites by 80%. Chlorate treatment of MM14 myoblasts abrogated the biological activity of acidic, basic, and Kaposi's sarcoma FGFs resulting in terminal differentiation. Chlorate inhibition of FGF signalling was reversed by the simultaneous addition of sodium sulfate or heparin. Further support for a direct role of heparan sulfate proteoglycans in fibroblast growth factor signal transduction was demonstrated by the ability of heparitinase to inhibit basic FGF binding and biological activity. These results suggest that activation of FGF receptors by acidic, basic or Kaposi's sarcoma FGF requires simultaneous binding to a HSPG and the tyrosine kinase receptor. Skeletal muscle differentiation in vivo may be dependent on FGFs, FGF tyrosine kinase receptors, and HSPGs. The regulation of these molecules may then be expected to have important implications for skeletal muscle development and regeneration.     

Similarities and differences between the effects of heparin and glypican-1 on the bioactivity of acidic fibroblast growth factor and the keratinocyte growth factor

The keratinocyte growth factor (KGF or FGF-7) is unique among its family members both in its target cell specificity and its inhibition by the addition of heparin and the native heparan-sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG), glypican-1 in cells expressing endogenous HSPGs. FGF-1, which binds the FGF-7 receptor with a similar affinity as FGF-7, is stimulated by both molecules. In the present study, we investigated the modulation of FGF-7 activities by heparin and glypican-1 in HS-free background utilizing either HS-deficient cells expressing the FGF-7 receptor (designated BaF/KGFR cells) or soluble extracellular domain of the receptor. At physiological concentrations of FGF-7, heparin was required for high affinity receptor binding and for signaling in BaF/KGFR cells. In contrast, binding of FGF-7 to the soluble form of the receptor did not require heparin. However, high concentrations of heparin inhibited the binding of FGF-7 to both the cell surface and the soluble receptor, similar to the reported effect of heparin in cells expressing endogenous HSPGs. The difference in heparin dependence for high affinity interaction between the cell surface and soluble receptor may be due to other molecule(s) present on cell surfaces. Glypican-1 differed from heparin in that it stimulated FGF-1 but not FGF-7 activities in BaF/KGFR cells. Glypican-1 abrogated the stimulatory effect of heparin, and heparin reversed the inhibitory effect of glypican-1, indicating that this HSPG inhibits FGF-7 activities by acting, most likely, as a competitive inhibitor of stimulatory HSPG species for FGF-7. The regulatory effect of glypican-1 is mediated at the level of interaction with the growth factor as glypican-1 did not bind the KGFR. The effect of heparin and glypican-1 on FGF-1 and FGF-7 oligomerization was studied employing high and physiological concentrations of growth factors. We did not find a correlation between the effects of these glycosaminoglycans on FGFs biological activity and oligomerization. Altogether, our findings argue against the heparin-linked dimer presentation model as key in FGFR activation, and support the notion that HSPGs primarily affect high affinity interaction of FGFs with their receptors.     

Ligand-induced coupling versus receptor pre-association: cellular automaton simulations of FGF-2 binding

The binding of basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) to its cell surface receptor (CSR) and subsequent signal transduction is known to be enhanced by heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). HSPGs bind FGF-2 with low affinity and likely impact CSR-mediated signaling via stabilization of FGF-2-CSR complexes via association with both the ligand and the receptor. What is unknown is whether HSPG associates with CSR in the absence of FGF-2. In this paper, we determine conditions by which pre-association would impact CSR-FGF-2-HSPG triad formation assuming diffusion-limited surface reactions. Using mean-field rate equations, we show that (i) when [HSPG] is much higher than [CSR], the presence of pre-formed complexes does not affect the steady state of FGF-2 binding, and (ii) when the concentrations are comparable, the presence of pre-formed complexes substantially increases the steady-state concentration of FGF-2 bound to CSR. These findings are supported by explicit cellular automaton simulations, which justify the mean-field treatment. We discuss the advantages of such a two-receptor system compared to a single-receptor model, when the parameters are comparable. Further, we speculate that the observed high concentration of HSPG in intact cells ([HSPG]-100[CSR]) provides a way to ensure that the binding levels of FGF-2 to its signaling receptor remains high, irrespective of the presence of pre-formed CSR-HSPG complexes on the cell surface, while allowing the cell to finely tune the response to FGF-2 via down-regulation of the signaling receptor.     

Inducible expression of the cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan syndecan-2 (fibroglycan) on human activated macrophages can regulate fibroblast growth factor action.

Monocyte/macrophages play important roles in regulating tissue growth and angiogenesis through the controlled release of heparin-binding growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF), vascular endothelial growth factor, and heparin binding epidermal growth factor. The action of these potent growth mediators is known to be regulated by adsorption to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) on the surface and within the extracellular matrix of other neighboring cells, which respectively promote or restrict interactions with their signal-transducing receptors on target cells. Here we report on the nature of HSPGs inducibly expressed on the surface of macrophages that confer these cells with the capacity to regulate endogenous growth factor activity. We reveal that activated human macrophages express only a single major 48-kDa cell surface HSPG, syndecan-2 (fibroglycan) as the result of de novo RNA and protein synthesis. In addition, we demonstrate this macrophage HSPG selectively binds the macrophage-derived growth factors FGF-2, vascular endothelial growth factor and heparin binding EGF and can present FGF-2 in a form that transactivates receptor-bearing BaF32 cells. These results define a novel and unique proteoglycan profile for macrophages and imply a key role for syndecan-2 in the delivery of sequestered growth factors by inflammatory macrophages for productive binding to their appropriate target cells in vivo.     

Identification of cell surface molecules that interact with pseudorabies virus.

The alphaherpesvirus pseudorabies virus (PrV) has been shown to attach to cells by interaction between the viral glycoprotein gC and cell membrane proteoglycans carrying heparan sulfate chains (HSPGs). A secondary binding step requires gD and presumably another, hitherto unidentified cellular receptor. By use of a virus overlay protein binding assay (VOPBA), cosedimentation analyses, and affinity chromatography, we identified three species of cell membrane constituents that bind PrV. By treatment with EDTA, peripheral HSPGs of very high apparent molecular mass (>200 kDa) could be extracted from Madin-Darby bovine kidney cells. Binding of PrV to these HSPGs in the VOPBA was sensitive to enzymatic digestion with heparinase or papain. Cosedimentation analyses indicated that binding between PrV and high-molecular-weight HSPG depended on the presence of gC in the virion. In addition, adsorption of radiolabeled PrV virions to cells could be inhibited by the addition of purified high-molecular-weight HSPG. By using urea extraction buffer, a second species of HSPG of approximately 140 kDa could be solubilized. Binding of PrV to this HSPG in the VOPBA was also dependent on the presence of heparan sulfate, since reactivity was abolished after suppression of glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis with NaClO3 and after heparinase treatment. In addition to HSPG, in cellular membrane extracts obtained by treatment with mild detergent, a 85-kDa membrane protein was demonstrated to bind PrV in the VOPBA and affinity chromatography. In summary, we identified three species of cell membrane constituents that bind PrV: a peripheral HSPG of high molecular weight, an integral HSPG of approximately 140 kDa, and an integral membrane protein of 85 kDa. It is tempting to speculate that interaction between PrV and the two species of HSPG mediates primary attachment of PrV and that the 85-kDa protein is involved in a subsequent attachment step.     

Ligand binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans induces their aggregation and distribution along actin cytoskeleton.

Cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) participate in molecular events that regulate cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation. The present study demonstrates that soluble heparin-binding proteins or cross-linking antibodies induce the aggregation of cell surface HSPGs and their distribution along underlying actin filaments. Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy and immunogold and electron microscopy indicate that, in the absence of ligands, HSPGs are irregularly distributed on the fibroblast cell surface, without any apparent codistribution with the actin cytoskeleton. In the presence of ligand (lipoprotein lipase) or antibodies against heparan sulfate, HSPGs aggregate and colocalize with the actin cytoskeleton. Triton X-100 extraction and immunoelectron microscopy have demonstrated that in this condition HSPGs were clustered and associated with the actin filaments. Crosslinking experiments that use biotinylated lipoprotein lipase have revealed three major proteoglycans as binding sites at the fibroblast cell surface. These cross-linked proteoglycans appeared in the Triton X-100 insoluble fraction. Platinum/carbon replicas of the fibroblast surface incubated either with lipoprotein lipase or antiheparan sulfate showed large aggregates of HSPGs regularly distributed along cytoplasmic fibers. Quantification of the spacing between HSPGs by confocal microscopy confirmed that the nonrandom distribution of HSPG aggregates along the actin cytoskeleton was induced by ligand binding. When cells were incubated either with lipoprotein lipase or antibodies against heparan sulfate, the distance between immunofluorescence spots was uniform. In contrast, the spacing between HSPGs on fixed cells not incubated with ligand was more variable. This highly organized spatial relationship between actin and proteoglycans suggests that cortical actin filaments could organize the molecular machinery involved in signal transduction and molecular movements on the cell surface that are triggered by heparin-binding proteins.     

Domains of neuronal heparan sulphate proteoglycans involved in neurite growth on laminin

Summary A single neuronal cell assay of neurite growth was utilized to determine types and domains of neuronal proteoglycans involved in neurite growth on laminin. Perturbations of biosynthesis and processing, enzymatic digestion with specific lyases, and competition with glycosaminoglycan side chains produced complementary data consistent with a molecular model implicating glycosaminoglycan (GAG) residues of heparan sulphate proteoglycans (HSPGs) in neurite growth. The observations suggest that HSPGs promote neurite growth on laminin by bridging between binding domains for HSPGs on laminin and on the neuronal cell surface, and that the bridge is tethered at both ends by noncovalent interactions between the binding domains and GAG side chains. Sulphation of the GAGs of HSPGs appears to be critical to the tethering and/or neurite growth-promoting activity of neuronal HSPGs.     

QSulf1 remodels the 6-O sulfation states of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans to promote Wnt signaling

The 6-O sulfation states of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) are dynamically regulated to control the growth and specification of embryonic progenitor lineages. However, mechanisms for regulation of HSPG sulfation have been unknown. Here, we report on the biochemical and Wnt signaling activities of QSulf1, a novel cell surface sulfatase. Biochemical studies establish that QSulf1 is a heparan sulfate (HS) 6-O endosulfatase with preference, in particular, toward trisulfated IdoA2S-GlcNS6S disaccharide units within HS chains. In cells, QSulf1 can function cell autonomously to remodel the sulfation of cell surface HS and promote Wnt signaling when localized either on the cell surface or in the Golgi apparatus. QSulf1 6-O desulfation reduces XWnt binding to heparin and HS chains of Glypican1, whereas heparin binds with high affinity to XWnt8 and inhibits Wnt signaling. CHO cells mutant for HS biosynthesis are defective in Wnt-dependent Frizzled receptor activation, establishing that HS is required for Frizzled receptor function. Together, these findings suggest a two-state "catch or present" model for QSulf1 regulation of Wnt signaling in which QSulf1 removes 6-O sulfates from HS chains to promote the formation of low affinity HS-Wnt complexes that can functionally interact with Frizzled receptors to initiate Wnt signal transduction.     

Constitutive release of alpha4 type V collagen N-terminal domain by Schwann cells and binding to cell surface and extracellular matrix heparan sulfate proteoglycans

During peripheral nerve development, Schwann cells synthesize collagen type V molecules that contain alpha4(V) chains. This collagen subunit possesses an N-terminal domain (NTD) that contains a unique high affinity heparin binding site. The alpha4(V)-NTD is adhesive for Schwann cells and sensory neurons and is an excellent substrate for Schwann cell and axonal migration. Here we show that the alpha4(V)-NTD is released constitutively by Schwann cells both in culture and in vivo. In cultures of neonatal rat Schwann cells, alpha4(V)-NTD release is increased significantly by ascorbate treatment, which facilitates collagen post-translational modification and collagen trimer assembly. In peripheral nerve tissue, the alpha4(V)-NTD is localized to the region of the outer Schwann cell membrane and associated extracellular matrix. The released alpha4(V)-NTD binds to the cell surface and extracellular matrix heparan sulfate proteoglycans of Schwann cells. Pull-down assays and immunofluorescent staining showed that the major alpha4(V)-NTD-binding proteins are glypican-1 and perlecan. alpha4(V)-NTD binding occurs via a mechanism that requires the high affinity heparin binding site and that is blocked by soluble heparin, demonstrating that binding to proteoglycans is mediated by their heparan sulfate chains.     

Heparan sulfate-independent cell binding and infection with furin-precleaved papillomavirus capsids

Papillomavirus infection normally involves virion binding to cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). However, we found that human papillomavirus type 16 pseudovirions efficiently bound and infected cells lacking HSPGs if their L2 capsid protein was precleaved by furin, a cellular protease required for infection. The inability of pseudovirions to efficiently bind and infect cultured primary keratinocytes was also overcome by furin precleavage, suggesting that the defect involves altered HSPG modification. We conclude that the primary function of HSPG binding is to enable cell surface furin cleavage of L2 and that binding to a distinct cell surface receptor(s) is a subsequent step of papillomavirus infection.     

Further evidence that papillomavirus capsids exist in two distinct conformations

Cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) serve as primary attachment receptors for human papillomaviruses (HPVs). To demonstrate that a biologically functional HPV-receptor interaction is restricted to a specific subset of HSPGs, we first explored the role of HSPG glucosaminoglycan side chain modifications. We demonstrate that HSPG O sulfation is essential for HPV binding and infection, whereas de-N-sulfated heparin interfered with VLP binding but not with HPV pseudoinfection. This points to differences in VLP-HSPG and pseudovirion-HSPG interactions. Interestingly, internalization kinetics of VLPs and pseudovirions, as measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, also differ significantly with approximate half times of 3.5 and 7.5 h, respectively. These data suggest that differences in HSPG binding significantly influence postbinding events. We also present evidence that pseudovirions undergo a conformational change after cell attachment. A monoclonal antibody (H33.J3), which displays negligible effectiveness in preattachment neutralization assays, efficiently neutralizes cell-bound virions. However, no difference in H33.J3 binding to pseudovirions and VLPs was observed in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and virus capture assays. In contrast to antibody H33.B6, which displays equal efficiencies in pre- and postattachment neutralization assays, H33.J3 does not block VLP binding to heparin, demonstrating that it interferes with steps subsequent to virus binding. Our data strongly suggest that H33.J3 recognizes a conformation-dependent epitope in capsid protein L1, which undergoes a structural change after cell attachment.     

Requirement for heparan sulphate proteoglycans to mediate basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2)-induced stimulation of Leydig cell steroidogenesis

This study reports that, in contrast to previous findings, basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) stimulates immature Leydig cell steroidogenesis in the absence of luteinizing hormone (LH). Heparan sulphate proteoglycans (HSPGs) are essential for this action of FGF-2 and the data suggest that HSPG/FGF-2 interactions have a significant role in the maintenance of immature Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Culture conditions were established for the maintenance of immature rat Leydig cells steroidogenesis in vitro for at least 2 days. Under these conditions the effect of exposure to FGF-2 at doses ranging from 0.1–10 ng/ml was shown to cause a significant stimulation of basal, but not LH-stimulated, 5-androstane 3,17β-diol production over 24h in culture. This stimulatory action on basal steroidogenesis is mediated through HSPG, as it was blocked by the addition of heparin (100 μg/ml), sodium chlorate (25mM) and protamine sulphate (5 μg/ml). These data demonstrate the involvement of HSPG in regulating FGF-2 action on Leydig cells and a potential role for Leydig cell HSPG in mediating paracrine regulatory actions of other heparin binding growth factors.     

Distinctive populations of basement membrane and cell membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycans are produced by cultured cell lines

We have investigated the nature and distribution of different populations of heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) in several cell lines in culture. Clone 9 hepatocytes and NRK and CHO cells were biosynthetically labeled with 35SO4, and proteoglycans were isolated by DEAE-Sephacel chromatography. Heterogeneous populations of HSPGs and chondroitin/dermatan proteoglycans (CSPGs) were found in the media and cell layer extracts of all cultures. HSPGs were further purified from the media and cell layers and separated from CSPGs by ion exchange chromatography after chondroitinase ABC digestion. In all cell types, HSPGs were found both in the cell layers (20-70% of the total) as well as the medium. When the purified HSPG fractions were further separated by octyl-Sepharose chromatography, very little HSPG in the incubation media bound to the octyl-Sepharose, whereas 40-55% of that in the cell layers bound and could be eluted with 1% Triton X-100. This hydrophobic population most likely consists of membrane-intercalated HSPGs. Basement membrane-type HSPGs were identified by immunoprecipitation as a component (30-80%) of the unbound (nonhydrophobic) HSPG fraction. By immunofluorescence, basement membrane-type HSPGs were distributed in a reticular network in Clone 9 and NRK cell monolayers; by immunoelectron microscopy, these HSPGs were localized to irregular clumps of extracellular matrix located beneath and between cells. The cells did not produce a morphologically recognizable basement membrane layer under these culture conditions. When membrane-associated HSPGs were localized by immunoelectron microscopy, they were found in a continuous layer along the cell membrane of all cell types. The results demonstrate that two antigenically distinct populations of HSPG--an extracellular matrix and a membrane-intercalated population--are found at the surface of several different cultured cells lines; these populations can be distinguished from one another by differences in their distribution in the monolayers by immunocytochemistry and can be separated by hydrophobic chromatography; and basement membrane-type HSPGs are secreted and deposited in the extracellular matrix by cultured cells even though they do not produce a bona fide basement membrane-like layer.     

Differential effects of murine and human factor X on adenovirus transduction via cell-surface heparan sulfate

Serum coagulation factor X (FX) is proposed to play a major role in adenovirus tropism, promoting transduction by bridging the virus to cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). Both murine FX and human FX increased transduction by Ad.CMVfLuc, an adenovirus vector, in murine hepatocyte-like cells and human hepatocarcinoma cells. In contrast, only hFX increased transduction of several non-hepatic cancer cell lines and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Not only was mFX unable to promote transduction in these cells, it competitively blocked hFX-enhanced transduction. Competition and HSPG digestion experiments suggested mFX- and hFX-enhanced transduction in hepatocyte-derived cells, and hFX-enhanced transduction in epithelial cancer cells were dependent on HSPGs. Ad·hFX-mediated transduction of CHO mutants unable to produce HSPGs was also curtailed. Hepatocyte-derived cells expressed substantially more HSPGs than the cancer cell lines. Dose-response curves and heparin-Sepharose binding suggested Ad·hFX has greater affinity for HSPGs than does Ad·mFX. In coagulation factor-depleted mice hFX also had enhanced ability, compared with mFX, to reconstitute hepatic adenovirus transduction. The results suggest that differences in Ad·hFX and Ad·mFX affinity to HSPGs may result in differences in their ability to enhance adenovirus transduction of many cells. These findings may have implications for murine models of adenovirus vector targeting.     

The cell surface proteoglycan syndecan-1 mediates fibroblast growth factor-2 binding and activity

Binding of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) to receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFRs) and signaling is facilitated by binding of FGF to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). There are multiple families of HSPGs, including extracellular and cell surface forms. An important and potentially controversial question is whether cell surface forms of HSPGs act as positive or negative regulators of FGF signaling. This study examines the ability of the cell surface HSPG syndecan-1 to regulate FGF binding and signaling. HSPG-deficient Raji lymphoma cells, expressing a transfected syndecan-1 cDNA (Raji S1 cells), were used as HSPG “donor” cells. BaF3 cells, expressing an FGFR1 cDNA (FR1C-11 cells), were used as FGFR “reporter” cells. Using Raji S1 cells preincubated with FGF, it was found that they formed heterotypic aggregates with FR1C-11 cells in the presence of FGF-2, but not FGF-1. In addition, the FR1C-11 cells demonstrated FGF-2, but not FGF-1, dependent survival when cultured on fixed Raji S1 cells. Thus, Raji syndecan-1 (1) differentially regulates the binding and signaling of FGFs 1 and 2 and (2) acts as a positive regulator of FGF-2 signaling. J. Cell. Physiol. 174:310–321, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Endosulfatases SULF1 and SULF2 limit Chlamydia muridarum infection

The first step in attachment of Chlamydia to host cells is thought to involve reversible binding to host heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), polymers of variably sulfated repeating disaccharide units coupled to diverse protein backbones. However, the key determinants of HSPG structure that are involved in Chlamydia binding are incompletely defined. A previous genome‐wide Drosophila RNAi screen suggested that the level of HSPG 6‐O sulfation rather than the identity of the proteoglycan backbone maybe a critical determinant for binding. Here, we tested in mammalian cells whether SULF1 or SULF2, human endosulfatases, which remove 6‐O sulfates from HSPGs, modulate Chlamydia infection. Ectopic expression of SULF1 or SULF2 in HeLa cells, which decreases cell surface HSPG sulfation, diminished C. muridarum binding and decreased vacuole formation. ShRNA depletion of endogenous SULF2 in a cell line that primarily expresses SULF2 augmented binding and increased vacuole formation. C. muridarum infection of diverse cell lines resulted indownregulation of SULF2 mRNA. In a murine model of acute pneumonia, mice genetically deficient in both endosulfatases or in SULF2 alone demonstrated increased susceptibility to C. muridarum lung infection. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that the level of HSPG 6‐O sulfation is a critical determinant of C. muridarum infection in vivo and that 6‐O endosulfatases are previously unappreciated modulators of microbial pathogenesis.     

LTBP-2 has multiple heparin/heparan sulfate binding sites

Latent transforming growth factor-beta-1 binding protein-2 (LTBP-2) is a protein of poorly understood function associated with fibrillin-1-containing microfibrils during elastinogenesis. In this study we investigated the molecular interactions of LTBP-2 with heparin and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) since unidentified cell surface HSPGs are critical for normal fiber assembly. In solid phase assays, heparin conjugated to albumin (HAC) bound strongly to recombinant full-length human LTBP-2. This interaction was completely blocked by addition of excess heparin, but not chondroitin sulfate, confirming specificity. Analysis of binding to LTBP-2 fragments showed that HAC bound strongly to N-terminal fragment LTBP-2 NT(H) and more weakly to central fragment LTBP-2 C(H). No binding was detected to C-terminal fragment LTBP-2 CT(H). Kds for heparin binding were calculated for full-length LTBP-2, LTBP-2 NT(H) and LTBP-2 C(H) as 0.9 nM, 0.7 nM and 80 nM respectively. HAC interaction with fragment LTBP-2 NT(H) was not sensitive to EDTA or EGTA indicating that binding had no requirement for Ca²⁺ ions whereas HAC binding to fragment LTBP-2 C(H) was markedly reduced by these chelating agents indicating a degree of Ca²⁺ dependence. Inhibition studies with synthetic peptides identified three major heparin binding sequences in fragment LTBP-2 NT(H), including sequence LTEKIKKIKIV in the first large cysteine-free domain of LTBP-2, adjacent to the previously identified fibulin-5 binding site. LTBP-2 was found to interact strongly in a heparin-inhibitable manner with cell surface HSPG syndecan-4, but showed no interaction with recombinant syndecan-2. LTBP-2 also showed strong interaction with the heparan sulfate chains of basement membrane HSPG, perlecan. The potential importance of HSPG–LTBP-2 interactions in elastic fiber assembly and microfibril attachment to basement membranes is discussed.