Roles of PCNA ubiquitination and TLS polymerases κ and η in the bypass of methyl methanesulfonate-induced DNA damage

Translesion synthesis (TLS) provides a highly conserved mechanism that enables DNA synthesis on a damaged template. TLS is performed by specialized DNA polymerases of which polymerase (Pol) κ is important for the cellular response to DNA damage induced by benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide (BPDE), ultraviolet (UV) light and the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). As TLS polymerases are intrinsically error-prone, tight regulation of their activity is required. One level of control is provided by ubiquitination of the homotrimeric DNA clamp PCNA at lysine residue 164 (PCNA-Ub). We here show that Polκ can function independently of PCNA modification and that Polη can function as a backup during TLS of MMS-induced lesions. Compared to cell lines deficient for PCNA modification (Pcna^K164R) or Polκ, double mutant cell lines display hypersensitivity to MMS but not to BPDE or UV-C. Double mutant cells also displayed delayed post-replicative TLS, accumulate higher levels of replication stress and delayed S-phase progression. Furthermore, we show that Polη and Polκ are redundant in the DNA damage bypass of MMS-induced DNA damage. Taken together, we provide evidence for PCNA-Ub-independent activation of Polκ and establish Polη as an important backup polymerase in the absence of Polκ in response to MMS-induced DNA damage.     

Differential Roles for DNA Polymerases Eta,Zeta, and REV1 in Lesion Bypass of Intrastrand versus Interstrand DNA Cross-Links

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) is a process whereby specialized DNA polymerases are recruited to bypass DNA lesions that would otherwise stall high-fidelity polymerases. We provide evidence that TLS across cisplatin intrastrand cross-links is performed by multiple translesion DNA polymerases. First, we determined that PCNA monoubiquitination by RAD18 is necessary for efficient bypass of cisplatin adducts by the TLS polymerases eta (Polη), REV1, and zeta (Polζ) based on the observations that depletion of these proteins individually leads to decreased cell survival, cell cycle arrest in S phase, and activation of the DNA damage response. Second, we showed that in addition to PCNA monoubiquitination by RAD18, the Fanconi anemia core complex is also important for recruitment of REV1 to stalled replication forks in cisplatin treated cells. Third, we present evidence that REV1 and Polζ are uniquely associated with protection against cisplatin and mitomycin C-induced chromosomal aberrations, and both are necessary for the timely resolution of DNA double-strand breaks associated with repair of DNA interstrand cross-links. Together, our findings indicate that REV1 and Polζ facilitate repair of interstrand cross-links independently of PCNA monoubiquitination and Polη, whereas RAD18 plus Polη, REV1, and Polζ are all necessary for replicative bypass of cisplatin intrastrand DNA cross-links.Maintenance of genomic integrity involves the activation of cell cycle checkpoints coupled with DNA repair. Despite these sophisticated mechanisms to remove DNA lesions prior to DNA replication, replication forks may inevitably encounter nonrepaired lesions that block high fidelity polymerases, potentially leading to replication fork instability, gaps in replicated DNA, and the generation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In order to preserve replication fork stability by allowing replication through polymerase blocking lesions, template DNA containing a damaged base or abasic site can be replicated through the actions of specialized translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) polymerases (61). A key event in the regulation of TLS is the monoubiquitination of PCNA, a homotrimeric protein that functions as an auxiliary factor for DNA polymerases (28, 31, 57, 60). The RAD6 (E2)-RAD18 (E3) complex specifically monoubiquitinates PCNA on Lys-164 in response to replication fork stalling. This event is thought to operate as a molecular switch from normal DNA replication to the TLS pathway based on the observations that association of Y-family TLS polymerases with monoubiquitinated PCNA is strengthened through the cooperative binding of one or more ubiquitin-binding domains (UBM or UBZ) plus a PCNA-interacting domain (6, 25).Extensive biochemical evidence suggests that replication through a large variety of lesions requires the sequential action of two TLS polymerases (44). The Y-family polymerase eta (Polη) plays a key role in the efficient and error-free bypass of cyclobutane pyrimidine (TT) dimers, one of the major lesions resulting from exposure to UV radiation (45). In contrast, Polη can only insert a nucleotide directly opposite other lesions and requires an additional TLS polymerase, such as Polζ, to extend beyond the insertion (45). Polζ is comprised of the REV3 catalytic subunit that shares homology with B-family polymerases plus the REV7 accessory subunit (34). Polζ is unusual compared to other TLS polymerases due to the fact that it is relatively efficient at extending beyond mispaired primer termini and nucleotides inserted opposite a variety of DNA lesions, although this may occur in a potentially mutagenic manner (45). Genetic evidence in yeast suggest that Polζ activity is regulated by the Y family REV1 polymerase (21). In addition to a UBM domain that directly interacts with monoubiquitinated PCNA, REV1 possesses an N-terminal BRCT motif that directly contacts PCNA and potentially other proteins (24, 25). In addition, REV1 possesses a unique protein interaction domain in its carboxy terminus that interacts with the Polζ accessory subunit, REV7, and other TLS polymerases, including Polη and the Polζ catalytic subunit, REV3 (1, 18, 23, 40, 58). The characterization of these protein-protein interaction domains has led to the proposal that REV1 facilitates polymerase switching from a polymerase that directly inserts a nucleotide opposite a damaged base and Polζ, which subsequently performs the extension step beyond the inserted nucleotide opposite the damaged base (21).In addition to facilitating direct lesion bypass and filling in postreplicative gaps in DNA, REV1 and Polζ may also play an important role in the repair of interstrand cross-links (46, 63). Deletion of REV1, REV3, or REV7 in chicken DT40 cells leads to remarkable hypersensitivity to a wide variety of genotoxic stresses, most notably cisplatin and other DNA cross-linking agents such as mitomycin C (MMC) (38, 41, 55, 56). The genetic epistasis observed between REV1, REV3, and the Fanconi anemia (FA) complementation group C (FANCC) gene for cisplatin sensitivity further implicates TLS in the interstrand cross-link repair pathway (38). Current models suggest that when two replication forks converge upon an interstrand cross-link, the MUS81-EME1 endonuclease recognizes and cleaves the resulting branched DNA structure by making an incision at one side of the interstrand cross-link creating a replication-associated DSB (26). The XPF-ERCC1 endonuclease uncouples the cross-linked cDNA strands by making an incision on the other side of the interstrand cross-link (37). Recent biochemical evidence suggests that Polζ performs DNA synthesis opposite the DNA strand containing the residual cross-link and this process may be necessary to prepare the daughter strand for subsequent homologous recombination repair of the replication-associated DSB (46).Agents that introduce intra- and interstrand cross-links are widely used in cancer chemotherapy, and thus understanding the means by which cells repair or cope with these lesions will be instrumental in identifying novel mechanisms leading to drug resistance and designing new agents refractory to DNA damage tolerance mechanisms. Polη, REV1, and Polζ have all been implicated in mediating TLS past cisplatin intrastrand cross-links since lowering their expression increases sensitivity and reduces cisplatin-induced mutagenesis in human cancer cells (2, 5, 12, 42, 62). Furthermore, biochemical and structural analyses of Polη identified this polymerase as being capable of efficiently inserting dCTP opposite the 3′dG of a 1,2-d(GpG) cisplatin intrastrand cross-link (3). Here, we demonstrate that RAD18, Polη, and REV1 all localized to sites of replication stress marked by PCNA and γ-H2AX foci after treatment of cells with cisplatin. However, REV1 focus formation is specifically dependent upon both RAD18 and a functional FA core complex, suggesting FA core proteins are also necessary for directing REV1 to cisplatin-induced stalled replication forks. In addition, depletion of RAD18, Polη, REV1, or Polζ proteins lead to the induction of cellular responses indicative of inefficient lesion bypass of cisplatin adducts. Unexpectedly, we found that REV1- or Polζ-depleted cells displayed a greater loss in cell viability and the accumulation of chromosome aberrations and failed to resolve DSBs after cisplatin treatment. These results lead us to hypothesize that REV1 and Polζ may be necessary for the repair of cisplatin interstrand cross-links in addition to performing lesion bypass of cisplatin intrastrand cross-links. In agreement with this concept, we found that REV1 and Polζ-depleted cells were uniquely hypersensitive to MMC, accumulated greater numbers of chromosome aberrations, and failed to resolve replication-associated DSBs induced by MMC treatment.Together our findings support a model where replicative bypass of cisplatin intrastrand cross-links requires cooperation of multiple TLS polymerases in mammalian cells and is triggered by PCNA monoubiquitination. Our results also provide evidence that REV1 and Polζ facilitate repair of interstrand cross-links in human cells, and this process is likely independent of PCNA monoubiquitination.     

DNA-damage tolerance mediated by PCNA?Ub fusions in human cells is dependent on Rev1 but not Polη

In response to replication-blocking lesions, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) can be sequentially ubiquitinated at the K164 residue, leading to two modes of DNA-damage tolerance, namely, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and error-free lesion bypass. Although the majority of reported data support a model whereby monoubiquitinated PCNA enhances its affinity for TLS polymerases and hence recruits them to the damage sites, this model has also been challenged by several observations. In this study, we expressed the PCNA-164R and ubiquitin (UB) fusion genes in an inducible manner in an attempt to mimic PCNA monoubiquitination in cultured human cells. It was found that expression of both N- and C-terminal PCNA•Ub fusions conferred significant tolerance to ultraviolet (UV)-induced DNA damage. Surprisingly, depletion of Polη, a TLS polymerase dedicated to bypassing UV-induced pyrimidine dimers, did not alter tolerance conferred by PCNA•Ub. In contrast, depletion of Rev1, another TLS polymerase serving as a scaffold for the assembly of the TLS complex, completely abolished PCNA•Ub-mediated damage tolerance. Similar genetic interactions were confirmed when UV-induced monoubiquitination of endogenous PCNA is abolished by RAD18 deletion. Hence, PCNA•Ub fusions bypass the requirement for PCNA monoubiquitination, and UV damage tolerance conferred by these fusions is dependent on Rev1 but independent of Polη.     

Constitutive fusion of ubiquitin to PCNA provides DNA damage tolerance independent of translesion polymerase activities

In response to replication-blocking DNA lesions, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) can be conjugated with a single ubiquitin (Ub) or Lys63-linked Ub chains at the Lys164 residue, leading to two modes of DNA damage tolerance (DDT), namely translesion synthesis (TLS) and error-free DDT, respectively. Several reports suggest a model whereby monoubiquitylated PCNA recruits TLS polymerases through an enhanced physical association. We sought to examine this model in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through artificial fusions of Ub to PCNA in vivo. We created N- and C- terminal gene fusions of Ub to PCNA-K164R (collectively called PCNA·Ub) and found that both conferred tolerance to DNA damage. The creation of viable PCNA·Ub strains lacking endogenous PCNA enabled a thorough analysis of roles for PCNA mono-Ub in DDT. As expected, the DNA damage resistance provided by PCNA·Ub is not dependent on RAD18 or UBC13. Surprisingly, inactivation of TLS polymerases did not abolish PCNA·Ub resistance to DNA damage, nor did PCNA·Ub cause elevated spontaneous mutagenesis, which is a defining characteristic of REV3-dependent TLS activity. Taken together, our data suggest that either the monoubiquitylation of PCNA does not promote TLS activity in all cases or PCNA·Ub reveals a currently undiscovered role for monoubiquitylated PCNA in DNA damage tolerance.     

Photo-activatable Ub-PCNA probes reveal new structural features of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Polη/PCNA complex

The Y-family DNA polymerase η (Polη) is critical for the synthesis past damaged DNA nucleotides in yeast through translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). TLS is initiated by monoubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and the subsequent recruitment of TLS polymerases. Although individual structures of the Polη catalytic core and PCNA have been solved, a high-resolution structure of the complex of Polη/PCNA or Polη/monoubiquitinated PCNA (Ub-PCNA) still remains elusive, partly due to the disordered Polη C-terminal region and the flexibility of ubiquitin on PCNA. To circumvent these obstacles and obtain structural insights into this important TLS polymerase complex, we developed photo-activatable PCNA and Ub-PCNA probes containing a p-benzoyl-L-phenylalanine (pBpa) crosslinker at selected positions on PCNA. By photo-crosslinking the probes with full-length Polη, specific crosslinking sites were identified following tryptic digestion and tandem mass spectrometry analysis. We discovered direct interactions of the Polη catalytic core and its C-terminal region with both sides of the PCNA ring. Model building using the crosslinking site information as a restraint revealed multiple conformations of Polη in the polymerase complex. Availability of the photo-activatable PCNA and Ub-PCNA probes will also facilitate investigations into other PCNA-containing complexes important for DNA replication, repair and damage tolerance.     

Different types of interaction between PCNA and PIP boxes contribute to distinct cellular functions of Y-family DNA polymerases

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) by the Y-family DNA polymerases Polη, Polι and Polκ, mediated via interaction with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), is a crucial pathway that protects human cells against DNA damage. We report that Polη has three PCNA-interacting protein (PIP) boxes (PIP1, 2, 3) that contribute differentially to two distinct functions, stimulation of DNA synthesis and promotion of PCNA ubiquitination. The latter function is strongly associated with formation of nuclear Polη foci, which co-localize with PCNA. We also show that Polκ has two functionally distinct PIP boxes, like Polη, whereas Polι has a single PIP box involved in stimulation of DNA synthesis. All three polymerases were additionally stimulated by mono-ubiquitinated PCNA in vitro. The three PIP boxes and a ubiquitin-binding zinc-finger of Polη exert redundant and additive effects in vivo via distinct molecular mechanisms. These findings provide an integrated picture of the orchestration of TLS polymerases.     

Role of the ubiquitin-binding domain of Polη in Rad18-independent translesion DNA synthesis in human cell extracts

In eukaryotic cells, the Rad6/Rad18-dependent monoubiquitination of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) plays an essential role in the switching between replication and translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). The DNA polymerase Polη binds to PCNA via a consensus C-terminal PCNA-interacting protein (PIP) motif. It also specifically interacts with monoubiquitinated PCNA thanks to a recently identified ubiquitin-binding domain (UBZ). To investigate whether the TLS activity of Polη is always coupled to PCNA monoubiquitination, we monitor the ability of cell-free extracts to perform DNA synthesis across different types of lesions. We observe that a cis-syn cyclobutane thymine dimer (TT-CPD), but not a N-2-acetylaminofluorene-guanine (G-AAF) adduct, is efficiently bypassed in extracts from Rad18-deficient cells, thus demonstrating the existence of a Polη-dependent and Rad18-independent TLS pathway. In addition, by complementing Polη-deficient cells with PIP and UBZ mutants, we show that each of these domains contributes to Polη activity. The finding that the bypass of a CPD lesion in vitro does not require Ub-PCNA but nevertheless depends on the UBZ domain of Polη, reveals that this domain may play a novel role in the TLS process that is not related to the monoubiquitination status of PCNA.     

Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes: lessons from proliferating cell nuclear antigenK164R mutant mice

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) encircles DNA as a ring-shaped homotrimer and, by tethering DNA polymerases to their template, PCNA serves as a critical replication factor. In contrast to high-fidelity DNA polymerases, the activation of low-fidelity translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases seems to require damage-inducible monoubiquitylation (Ub) of PCNA at lysine residue 164 (PCNA-Ub). TLS polymerases can tolerate DNA damage, i.e. they can replicate across DNA lesions. The lack of proofreading activity, however, renders TLS highly mutagenic. The advantage is that B cells use mutagenic TLS to introduce somatic mutations in immunoglobulin (Ig) genes to generate high-affinity antibodies. Given the critical role of PCNA-Ub in activating TLS and the role of TLS in establishing somatic mutations in immunoglobulin genes, we analysed the mutation spectrum of somatically mutated immunoglobulin genes in B cells from PCNA^K164R knock-in mice. A 10-fold reduction in A/T mutations is associated with a compensatory increase in G/C mutations—a phenotype similar to Polη and mismatch repair-deficient B cells. Mismatch recognition, PCNA-Ub and Polη probably act within one pathway to establish the majority of mutations at template A/T. Equally relevant, the G/C mutator(s) seems largely independent of PCNA^K164 modification.     

Genetic Control of Replication through N1-methyladenine in Human Cells

N1-methyl adenine (1-MeA) is formed in DNA by reaction with alkylating agents and naturally occurring methyl halides. The 1-MeA lesion impairs Watson-Crick base pairing and blocks normal DNA replication. Here we identify the translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases (Pols) required for replicating through 1-MeA in human cells and show that TLS through this lesion is mediated via three different pathways in which Pols ι and θ function in one pathway and Pols η and ζ, respectively, function in the other two pathways. Our biochemical studies indicate that in the Polι/Polθ pathway, Polι would carry out nucleotide insertion opposite 1-MeA from which Polθ would extend synthesis. In the Polη pathway, this Pol alone would function at both the nucleotide insertion and extension steps of TLS, and in the third pathway, Polζ would extend from the nucleotide inserted opposite 1-MeA by an as yet unidentified Pol. Whereas by pushing 1-MeA into the syn conformation and by forming Hoogsteen base pair with the T residue, Polι would carry out TLS opposite 1-MeA, the ability of Polη to replicate through 1-MeA suggests that despite its need for Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding, Polη can stabilize the adduct in its active site. Remarkably, even though Pols η and ι are quite error-prone at inserting nucleotides opposite 1-MeA, TLS opposite this lesion in human cells occurs in a highly error-free fashion. This suggests that the in vivo fidelity of TLS Pols is regulated by factors such as post-translational modifications, protein-protein interactions, and possibly others.     

A role for PCNA2 in translesion synthesis by Arabidopsis thaliana DNA polymerase η

Eukaryotic DNA polymerase η (Polη) confers ultraviolet (UV) resistance by catalyzing translesion synthesis (TLS) past UV photoproducts. Polη has been studied extensively in budding yeast and mammalian cells, where its interaction with monoubiquitylated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is necessary for its biological activity. Recently, in collaboration with other investigators, our laboratory demonstrated that Arabidopsis thaliana Polη is required for UV resistance in plants. Furthermore, the purified enzyme can perform TLS opposite a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer and interacts with PCNA. Intriguingly, the biological activity of Polη in a heterologous yeast assay depends on co-expression with Arabidopsis PCNA2 and Polη sequences implicated in binding PCNA or ubiquitin. We suggest that interaction of Arabidopsis Polη with ubiquitylated PCNA2 is required for TLS past UV photoproducts by Polη.Key words: polymerase η, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, translesion synthesis, ubiquitin, Arabidopsis thaliana, ultraviolet radiationUltraviolet (UV)-induced pyrimidine dimers can block the progression of DNA replication forks potentially disrupting the replication machinery and resulting in cell death. For this reason, cells have evolved non-essential, low fidelity DNA polymerases (Pols) capable of copying damaged templates,^1,2 a process termed translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). In budding yeast, TLS past UV photoproducts is catalyzed by Polη and Polζ (composed of the Rev3 catalytic and Rev7 accessory subunits), but also involves the Rev1 protein in an as yet undetermined role linked to Polζ.^1,3,4 Yeast and human Polη replicates cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), in particular thymine-thymine (TT) CPDs, in a relatively error-free manner whereas Polζ is essential for UV mutagenesis implicating it in error-prone TLS.^1,4,5Both UV resistance due to TLS and the polymerases responsible have been well-studied in yeast and mammalian cells over the past decade. Only more recently has evidence emerged that TLS may also contribute to UV resistance in plants. Arabidopsis thaliana POLH, REV1, REV3 and REV7 encode homologs of Polη, Rev1, Rev3 and Rev7, respectively.^6–10 T-DNA insertions in POLH, REV1 or REV3 sensitise root growth to acute UV doses,^6–8,10 and these mutations, as well as inactivation of REV7, increase the sensitivity of whole plants to longer term UV treatment.^6,8 Interestingly, polh rev3 double mutants show an additive increase in UV sensitivity over that observed for polh and rev3 single mutants,^6,10 potentially pointing to differences in the UV photoproducts bypassed by the two polymerases. That the enhanced UV sensitivity of the mutants may reflect a TLS deficiency is suggested by the finding that purified Arabidopsis Polη catalyzes primer extension and TLS past a TT CPD in vitro.⁶For TLS to occur, Polη must gain access to the replication machinery arrested at a UV photoproduct. It does so in yeast and mammalian cells by interacting with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), the eukaryotic sliding clamp required for processive DNA replication.^1,3,11, DNA damage or stalling of the replicative polymerase triggers monoubiquitylation of PCNA at lysine 164 by a complex of the E2 ubiquitin conjugase Rad6 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Rad18.^1,3,11,12 This modification increases the affinity of Polη for PCNA, with which it interacts via a single PCNA interacting peptide (PIP) box and a single ubiquitin-binding zinc finger (UBZ) domain.^1,3In contrast to its yeast and mammalian counterparts, Polη from Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa (rice) has two PIP boxes and lacks a UBZ.^6,9,10 Instead the two polymerases each possess two ubiquitin-binding motifs (UBMs) similar to those present in the Arabidopsis Rev1 protein and a vertebrate TLS polymerase, Pol., for which there is no homolog in Arabidopsis.^6,13 Considerable differences in the sequences flanking the UBMs in Polη and Rev1 argue that Polη did not acquire its UBMs from Rev1, and so, although perhaps unique to plant Polη, their origin remains a mystery.The presence of PCNA- and ubiquitin-binding sequences in plant Polη hint that it may operate in TLS in a manner similar to that for Polη from yeast or mammalian cells. Indeed, three lines of evidence⁶ lead us to suggest that the Polη PIP boxes and UBMs likely function in binding ubiquitylated PCNA and this interaction is probably required for TLS past UV photoproducts by Arabidopsis Polη. First, Arabidopsis Polη interacts physically and in yeast two-hybrid assays with Arabidopsis PCNA1 and PCNA2. Second, expression in yeast of Arabidopsis cDNAs encoding Polη and PCNA2, but not PCNA1, fully complements the UV sensitivity conferred by elimination of yeast Polη. In vitro mutagenesis suggests the inability of Polη plus PCNA1 to restore UV resistance is due to a lysine at position 201 in PCNA1 but not PCNA2. In the three-dimensional structure of PCNA, amino acid 201 lies adjacent to lysine-164, the residue that is ubiquitylated in yeast and human PCNA. Thus, one possibility is that lysine-201 in PCNA1 prevents complementation of UV sensitivity by inhibiting ubiquitylation of lysine-164. Third, altering presumed critical residues in either of the two PIP boxes or UBM2 in Arabidopsis Polη also prevents restoration of UV resistance in Polη-deficient yeast cells.Several important parts of the puzzle remain to be solved. In particular, the ubiquitylation of plant PCNA has yet to be demonstrated, and the identity of the proteins that might monoubiquitylate plant PCNA is uncertain. Although Arabidopsis Rad6 homologs can ubiquitylate target proteins in vitro, there is no evidence that Arabidopsis PCNA1 or PCNA2 is a substrate, and Arabidopsis lacks a Rad18 homolog.^14,15 Finally, if PCNA is ubiquitylated in planta, does this occur at lysine-164 in response to DNA damage or replication fork stalling, is the interaction of Polη with PCNA stimulated by this modification, and is an enhanced interaction mediated by the Polη UBMs?     

Roles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerases Poleta and Polzeta in response to irradiation by simulated sunlight

Sunlight causes lesions in DNA that if unrepaired and inaccurately replicated by DNA polymerases yield mutations that result in skin cancer in humans. Two enzymes involved in translesion synthesis (TLS) of UV-induced photolesions are DNA polymerase η (Polη) and polymerase ζ (Polζ), encoded by the RAD30A and REV3 genes, respectively. Previous studies have investigated the TLS roles of these polymerases in human and yeast cells irradiated with monochromatic, short wavelength UVC radiation (254 nm). However, less is known about cellular responses to solar radiation, which is of higher and mixed wavelengths (310–1100 nm) and produces a different spectrum of DNA lesions, including Dewar photoproducts and oxidative lesions. Here we report on the comparative cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of simulated sunlight (SSL) and UVC radiation on yeast wild-type, rad30Δ, rev3Δ and rev3Δ rad30Δ strains. The results with SSL support several previous interpretations on the roles of these two polymerases in TLS of photodimers and (6–4) photoproducts derived from studies with UVC. They further suggest that Polη participates in the non-mutagenic bypass of SSL-dependent cytosine-containing Dewar photoproducts and 8-oxoguanine, while Polζ is mainly responsible for the mutagenic bypass of all types of Dewar photoproducts. They also suggest that in the absence of Polζ, Polη contributes to UVC- and SSL-induced mutagenesis, possibly by the bypass of photodimers containing deaminated cytosine.     

The ubiquitin-binding domain of DNA polymerase η directly binds to DNA clamp PCNA and regulates translesion DNA synthesis

DNA polymerase eta (Polη) is a unique translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) enzyme required for the error-free bypass of ultraviolet ray (UV)-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in DNA. Therefore, its deficiency confers cellular sensitivity to UV radiation and an increased rate of UV-induced mutagenesis. Polη possesses a ubiquitin-binding zinc finger (ubz) domain and a PCNA-interacting-protein (pip) motif in the carboxy-terminal region. The role of the Polη pip motif in PCNA interaction required for DNA polymerase recruitment to the stalled replication fork has been demonstrated in earlier studies; however, the function of the ubz domain remains divisive. As per the current notion, the ubz domain of Polη binds to the ubiquitin moiety of the ubiquitinated PCNA, but such interaction is found to be nonessential for Polη''s function. In this study, through amino acid sequence alignments, we identify three classes of Polη among different species based on the presence or absence of pip motif or ubz domain and using comprehensive mutational analyses, we show that the ubz domain of Polη, which intrinsically lacks the pip motif directly binds to the interdomain connecting loop (IDCL) of PCNA and regulates Polη''s TLS activity. We further propose two distinct modes of PCNA interaction mediated either by pip motif or ubz domain in various Polη homologs. When the pip motif or ubz domain of a given Polη binds to the IDCL of PCNA, such interaction becomes essential, whereas the binding of ubz domain to PCNA through ubiquitin is dispensable for Polη''s function.     

SIVA1 directs the E3 ubiquitin ligase RAD18 for PCNA monoubiquitination

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) is a universal DNA damage tolerance mechanism conserved from yeast to mammals. A key event in the regulation of TLS is the monoubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Extensive evidence indicates that the RAD6–RAD18 ubiquitin-conjugating/ligase complex specifically monoubiquitinates PCNA and regulates TLS repair. However, the mechanism by which the RAD6–RAD18 complex is targeted to PCNA has remained elusive. In this study, we used an affinity purification approach to isolate the PCNA-containing complex and have identified SIVA1 as a critical regulator of PCNA monoubiquitination. We show that SIVA1 constitutively interacts with PCNA via a highly conserved PCNA-interacting peptide motif. Knockdown of SIVA1 compromised RAD18-dependent PCNA monoubiquitination and Polη focus formation, leading to elevated ultraviolet sensitivity and mutation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SIVA1 interacts with RAD18 and serves as a molecular bridge between RAD18 and PCNA, thus targeting the E3 ligase activity of RAD18 onto PCNA. Collectively, our results provide evidence that the RAD18 E3 ligase requires an accessory protein for binding to its substrate PCNA.     

Mismatch repair protein MSH2 regulates translesion DNA synthesis following exposure of cells to UV radiation

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) can use specialized DNA polymerases to insert and/or extend nucleotides across lesions, thereby limiting stalled replication fork collapse and the potential for cell death. Recent studies have shown that monoubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) plays an important role in recruitment of Y-family TLS polymerases to stalled replication forks after DNA damage treatment. To explore the possible roles of other factors that regulate the ultraviolet (UV)-induced assembly of specialized DNA polymerases at arrested replication forks, we performed immunoprecipitation experiments combined with mass spectrometry and established that DNA polymerase kappa (Polκ) can partner with MSH2, an important mismatch repair protein associated with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. We found that depletion of MSH2 impairs PCNA monoubiquitination and the formation of foci containing Polκ and other TLS polymerases after UV irradiation of cells. Interestingly, expression of MSH2 in Rad18-deficient cells increased UV-induced Polκ and REV1 focus formation without detectable changes in PCNA monoubiquitination, indicating that MSH2 can regulate post-UV focus formation by specialized DNA polymerases in both PCNA monoubiquitination-dependent and -independent fashions. Moreover, we observed that MSH2 can facilitate TLS across cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers photoproducts in living cells, presenting a novel role of MSH2 in post-UV cellular responses.     

In vivo evidence for translesion synthesis by the replicative DNA polymerase δ

The intolerance of DNA polymerase δ (Polδ) to incorrect base pairing contributes to its extremely high accuracy during replication, but is believed to inhibit translesion synthesis (TLS). However, chicken DT40 cells lacking the POLD3 subunit of Polδ are deficient in TLS. Previous genetic and biochemical analysis showed that POLD3 may promote lesion bypass by Polδ itself independently of the translesion polymerase Polζ of which POLD3 is also a subunit. To test this hypothesis, we have inactivated Polδ proofreading in pold3 cells. This significantly restored TLS in pold3 mutants, enhancing dA incorporation opposite abasic sites. Purified proofreading-deficient human Polδ holoenzyme performs TLS of abasic sites in vitro much more efficiently than the wild type enzyme, with over 90% of TLS events resulting in dA incorporation. Furthermore, proofreading deficiency enhances the capability of Polδ to continue DNA synthesis over UV lesions both in vivo and in vitro. These data support Polδ contributing to TLS in vivo and suggest that the mutagenesis resulting from loss of Polδ proofreading activity may in part be explained by enhanced lesion bypass.     

REV3L,a Promising Target in Regulating the Chemosensitivity of Cervical Cancer Cells

REV3L, the catalytic subunit of DNA Polymerase ζ (Polζ), plays a significant role in the DNA damage tolerance mechanism of translesion synthesis (TLS). The role of REV3L in chemosensitivity of cervical cancer needs exploration. In the present study, we evaluated the expression of the Polζ protein in paraffin-embedded tissues using immunohistochemistry and found that the expression of Polζ in cervical cancer tissues was higher than that in normal tissues. We then established some cervical cancer cell lines with REV3L suppression or overexpression. Depletion of REV3L suppresses cell proliferation and colony formation of cervical cancer cells through G₁ arrest, and REV3L promotes cell proliferation and colony formation of cervical cancer cells by promoting G₁ phase to S phase transition. The suppression of REV3L expression enhanced the sensitivity of cervical cancer cells to cisplatin, and the overexpression of REV3L conferred resistance to cisplatin as evidenced by the alteration of apoptosis rates, and significantly expression level changes of anti-apoptotic proteins B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1 (Mcl-1) and B-cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-xl) and proapoptotic Bcl-2-associated x protein (Bax). Our data suggest that REV3L plays an important role in regulating cervical cancer cellular response to cisplatin, and thus targeting REV3L may be a promising way to alter chemosensitivity in cervical cancer patients.     

FF483–484 motif of human Polη mediates its interaction with the POLD2 subunit of Polδ and contributes to DNA damage tolerance

Switching between replicative and translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases are crucial events for the completion of genomic DNA synthesis when the replication machinery encounters lesions in the DNA template. In eukaryotes, the translesional DNA polymerase η (Polη) plays a central role for accurate bypass of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, the predominant DNA lesions induced by ultraviolet irradiation. Polη deficiency is responsible for a variant form of the Xeroderma pigmentosum (XPV) syndrome, characterized by a predisposition to skin cancer. Here, we show that the FF_483–484 amino acids in the human Polη (designated F1 motif) are necessary for the interaction of this TLS polymerase with POLD2, the B subunit of the replicative DNA polymerase δ, both in vitro and in vivo. Mutating this motif impairs Polη function in the bypass of both an N-2-acetylaminofluorene adduct and a TT-CPD lesion in cellular extracts. By complementing XPV cells with different forms of Polη, we show that the F1 motif contributes to the progression of DNA synthesis and to the cell survival after UV irradiation. We propose that the integrity of the F1 motif of Polη, necessary for the Polη/POLD2 interaction, is required for the establishment of an efficient TLS complex.     

Redundancy of mammalian Y family DNA polymerases in cellular responses to genomic DNA lesions induced by ultraviolet light

Short-wave ultraviolet light induces both mildly helix-distorting cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and severely distorting (6–4) pyrimidine pyrimidone photoproducts ((6–4)PPs). The only DNA polymerase (Pol) that is known to replicate efficiently across CPDs is Polη, a member of the Y family of translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases. Phenotypes of Polη deficiency are transient, suggesting redundancy with other DNA damage tolerance pathways. Here we performed a comprehensive analysis of the temporal requirements of Y-family Pols ι and κ as backups for Polη in (i) bypassing genomic CPD and (6–4)PP lesions in vivo, (ii) suppressing DNA damage signaling, (iii) maintaining cell cycle progression and (iv) promoting cell survival, by using mouse embryonic fibroblast lines with single and combined disruptions in these Pols. The contribution of Polι is restricted to TLS at a subset of the photolesions. Polκ plays a dominant role in rescuing stalled replication forks in Polη-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts, both at CPDs and (6–4)PPs. This dampens DNA damage signaling and cell cycle arrest, and results in increased survival. The role of relatively error-prone Pols ι and κ as backups for Polη contributes to the understanding of the mutator phenotype of xeroderma pigmentosum variant, a syndrome caused by Polη defects.     

The post-replication repair RAD18 and RAD6 genes are involved in the prevention of spontaneous mutations caused by 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

7,8-Dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is an abundant and mutagenic lesion produced in DNA exposed to free radicals and reactive oxygen species. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the OGG1 gene encodes the 8-oxoG DNA N-glycosylase/AP lyase (Ogg1), which is the functional homologue of the bacterial Fpg. Ogg1-deficient strains are spontaneous mutators that accumulate GC to TA transversions due to unrepaired 8-oxoG in DNA. In yeast, DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and translesion synthesis (TLS) by DNA polymerase η also play a role in the prevention of the mutagenic effect of 8-oxoG. In the present study, we show the RAD18 and RAD6 genes that are required to initiate post-replication repair (PRR) are also involved in the prevention of mutations by 8-oxoG. Consistently, a synergistic increase in spontaneous Can^R and Lys⁺ mutation rates is observed in the absence of Rad6 or Rad18 proteins in ogg1 mutant strains. Spectra of Can^R mutations in ogg1 rad18 and ogg1 rad6 double mutants show a strong bias in the favor of GC to TA transversions, which are 137- and 189-fold higher than in the wild-type, respectively. The results also show that Polη (RAD30 gene product) plays a critical role on the prevention of mutations at 8-oxoG, whereas Polζ (REV3 gene product) does not. Our current model suggests that the Rad6–Rad18 complex targets Polη at DNA gaps that result from the MMR-mediated excision of adenine mispaired with 8-oxoG, allowing error-free dCMP incorporation opposite to this lesion.     

RAD5a and REV3 function in two alternative pathways of DNA-damage tolerance in Arabidopsis

DNA-damage tolerance (DDT) in yeast is composed of two parallel pathways and mediated by sequential ubiquitinations of PCNA. While monoubiquitination of PCNA promotes translesion synthesis (TLS) that is dependent on polymerase ζ consisted of a catalytic subunit Rev3 and a regulatory subunit Rev7, polyubiquitination of PCNA by Mms2-Ubc13-Rad5 promotes error-free lesion bypass. Inactivation of these two pathways results in a synergistic effect on DNA-damage responses; however, this two-branch DDT model has not been reported in any multicellular organisms. In order to examine whether Arabidopsis thaliana possesses a two-branch DDT system, we created rad5a rev3 double mutant plant lines and compared them with the corresponding single mutants. Arabidopsis rad5a and rev3 mutations are indeed synergistic with respect to root growth inhibition induced by replication-blocking lesions, suggesting that AtRAD5a and AtREV3 are required for error-free and TLS branches of DDT, respectively. Unexpectedly this study reveals three modes of genetic interactions in response to different types of DNA damage, implying that plant RAD5 and REV3 are also involved in DNA damage responses independent of DDT. By comparing with yeast cells, it is apparent that plant TLS is a more frequently utilized means of lesion bypass than error-free DDT in plants.