Tet Proteins Connect the O-Linked N-acetylglucosamine Transferase Ogt to Chromatin in Embryonic Stem Cells

1. Download : Download high-res image (107KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights? Ogt forms a complex with Tet1 and Tet2 in the nucleus of embryonic stem cells ? Ogt preferentially associates with promoter regions in proximity of TSS ? Ogt shows >90% of colocalization with Tet1 at methylation-free CpG-rich elements ? Tet1 is required for global Ogt chromatin recruitment regulating its activity     

Different binding properties and function of CXXC zinc finger domains in Dnmt1 and Tet1

Several mammalian proteins involved in chromatin and DNA modification contain CXXC zinc finger domains. We compared the structure and function of the CXXC domains in the DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1 and the methylcytosine dioxygenase Tet1. Sequence alignment showed that both CXXC domains have a very similar framework but differ in the central tip region. Based on the known structure of a similar MLL1 domain we developed homology models and designed expression constructs for the isolated CXXC domains of Dnmt1 and Tet1 accordingly. We show that the CXXC domain of Tet1 has no DNA binding activity and is dispensable for catalytic activity in vivo. In contrast, the CXXC domain of Dnmt1 selectively binds DNA substrates containing unmethylated CpG sites. Surprisingly, a Dnmt1 mutant construct lacking the CXXC domain formed covalent complexes with cytosine bases both in vitro and in vivo and rescued DNA methylation patterns in dnmt1^−/− embryonic stem cells (ESCs) just as efficiently as wild type Dnmt1. Interestingly, neither wild type nor ΔCXXC Dnmt1 re-methylated imprinted CpG sites of the H19a promoter in dnmt1^−/− ESCs, arguing against a role of the CXXC domain in restraining Dnmt1 methyltransferase activity on unmethylated CpG sites.     

Tet1 and Tet2 regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine production and cell lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells

TET family enzymes convert 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) in DNA. Here, we show that Tet1 and Tet2 are Oct4-regulated enzymes that together sustain 5hmC in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and are induced concomitantly with 5hmC during reprogramming of fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. ESCs depleted of Tet1 by RNAi show diminished expression of the Nodal antagonist Lefty1 and display hyperactive Nodal signaling and skewed differentiation into the endoderm-mesoderm lineage in embryoid bodies in?vitro. In Fgf4- and heparin-supplemented culture conditions, Tet1-depleted ESCs activate the trophoblast stem cell lineage determinant Elf5 and can colonize the placenta in midgestation embryo chimeras. Consistent with these findings, Tet1-depleted ESCs?form aggressive hemorrhagic teratomas with increased endoderm, reduced neuroectoderm, and ectopic appearance of trophoblastic giant cells. Thus, 5hmC is an epigenetic modification associated with the pluripotent state, and Tet1 functions to regulate the lineage differentiation potential of ESCs.     

Different Roles for Tet1 and Tet2 Proteins in Reprogramming-Mediated Erasure of Imprints Induced by EGC Fusion

1. Download : Download high-res image (228KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights? EGCs can erase DNA methylation at ICRs in somatic cells after fusion ? EGCs selectively induce 5hmC accumulation at ICRs in the somatic genome ? Conversion of 5mC to 5hmC at these imprinted domains requires Tet1 ? Tet2 depletion results in delayed reprogramming by EGCs     

PGC7, H3K9me2 and Tet3: regulators of DNA methylation in zygotes

In zygotes, a global loss of DNA methylation occurs selectively in the paternal pronucleus before the first cell division, concomitantly with the appearance of modified forms of 5-methylcytosine. The adjacent maternal pronucleus and certain paternally-imprinted loci are protected from this process. Nakamura et al. recently clarified the molecular mechanism involved: PGC7/Stella/Dppa3 binds to dimethylated histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9me2), thereby blocking the activity of the Tet3 methylcytosine oxidase in the maternal genome as well as at certain imprinted loci in the paternal genome.DNA methylation is a crucial epigenetic modification that regulates imprinting (differential silencing of maternal or paternal alleles) and repression of retrotransposons and other parasitic DNA, as well as possibly X-chromosome inactivation and cellular differentiation. DNA methylation needs to be faithfully maintained throughout the life cycle, since loss of DNA methylation can result in gene dosage problems, dysregulation of gene expression, and genomic instability due to retrotransposon reactivation¹. Nevertheless, genome-wide loss of DNA methylation has been observed during germ cell development² and in the paternal pronucleus soon after fertilization³.For almost a decade, the global decrease of DNA methylation observed in the paternal genome within a few hours of fertilization was ascribed to an “active”, replication-independent process³. The maternal pronucleus is spared and instead undergoes “passive”, replication-dependent demethylation during early embryogenesis, arising from inhibition of the DNA maintenance methyltransferase Dnmt1 (Dnmt1 is normally recruited to newly-replicated DNA because of the high affinity of its obligate partner, UHRF1, for hemi-methylated DNA strands, which are produced from symmetrically-methylated CpG dinucleotides as a result of DNA replication). The basis for active and passive demethylation of the paternal and maternal genomes remained a mystery until proteins of the TET family – TET1, TET2 and TET3 in humans – were discovered to be Fe(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent enzymes capable of oxidizing 5-methylcytosine (5mC) in DNA^4,5,6. TET enzymes serially convert 5mC into 5-hydroxymethyl-cytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxycytosine (5caC)^5,7,8.With the generation of specific antibodies to 5hmC, it became clear that the supposed “active demethylation” of the paternal pronucleus in mouse zygote after fertilization was due to the inability of anti-5mC antibodies to recognize 5hmC and other 5mC oxidation products^9,10. The enzyme responsible for 5mC oxidation was shown to be Tet3, which unlike Tet1 and Tet2 is highly expressed in mouse oocytes and zygotes. RNAi-mediated depletion of Tet3 decreased the staining of the paternal pronucleus with 5hmC, suggesting that immediately after fertilization, Tet3 in the zygote selectively oxidizes 5mC in the paternal genome to 5hmC^9,10.How is the maternal pronucleus protected from Tet3 activity? Nakamura et al.¹¹ previously showed that zygotes lacking PGC7/Stella/Dppa3 lose asymmetric regulation of DNA methylation, instead showing global loss of 5mC staining in both paternal and maternal pronuclei. This was correlated with hypomethylation at several maternally-imprinted loci (Peg1, Peg3, Peg10) in PGC7-deficient zygotes, as judged by bisulfite sequencing. Further, certain paternally-imprinted loci (H19, Rasgrf1), which are normally protected from global loss of methylation in the paternal genome, also became hypomethylated in PGC7-deficient zygotes. These data suggested that PGC7 protects the maternal genome, as well as certain paternally imprinted loci, from loss of 5mC.In their recent publication, Nakamura et al.¹² elegantly extended these findings to address the mechanism involved. Based on the fact that a major difference between maternal and paternal genomes is that the maternal genome contains histones, whereas the DNA of the entering sperm is tightly packaged with protamine, they asked whether PGC7 recognizes specific histone marks. Indeed, the maternal genome harbors considerable levels of the histone mark H3K9me2¹¹, leading them to examine whether PGC7 distinguishes maternal and paternal genomes by recognizing H3K9me2 in the maternal genome. Using wild-type (WT) ES cells and ES cells deficient in the G9a lysine methyltransferase which generates H3K9me2 mark, they showed that PGC7 associated loosely with nucleosomes and chromatin lacking H3K9me2, but tightly if H3K9me2 was present. The binding was recapitulated using recombinant bacterially-expressed PGC7 and histone tail peptides, indicating a direct interaction of PGC7 with the H3K9me2 mark. In agreement, genomic loci enriched with H3K9me2 recruited PGC7 as judged by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), but this recruitment was abrogated in G9a-deficient ES cells. These data indicated that PGC7 targets genomic regions occupied by nucleosomes containing H3K9me2 (Figure 1); an interesting extension would be to ask whether loss of maternal G9a also results in 5hmC conversion in the maternal pronucleus in zygotes.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Schematic view of paternal (left) and maternal (right) genomes soon after fertilization. Paternal and maternal pronuclei are indicated with immunostaining results in the boxes. PGC7 binds H3K9me2 in the maternal pronucleus and at certain paternally-imprinted loci (H19, Rasgrf1) in the paternal pronucleus, thereby potentially regulating chromatin organization to interfere with Tet3 accessibility.Next, Nakamura et al.¹² tested by immunocytochemistry whether PGC7 in zygotes also required H3K9me2. It is known that H3K9me2 staining is concentrated in the maternal but not the paternal pronucleus¹³. Using conventional staining methods in which the cells are first fixed and then permeabilized to allow antibodies to enter the cell, the authors observed in their earlier study that PGC7 bound to both pronuclei¹¹. Remarkably, by simply reversing the order of the fixation and permeabilization steps – permeabilizing first to allow the loss of loosely bound proteins by dissociation, then fixing and staining – they found that PGC7 associated much more tightly with the maternal pronucleus that bears H3K9me2 mark. Injection of mRNA encoding Jhdm2a (an H3K9me1/ me2-specific demethylase) into zygotes eliminated staining for H3K9me2 as well as PGC7 in the maternal pronucleus, and concomitantly caused loss of 5mC and acquisition of 5hmC. Taken together, these data strongly suggested that PGC7 was selectively recruited to the maternal pronucleus through binding H3K9me2, and that this binding protected zygotic maternal DNA from oxidation of 5mC to 5hmC and beyond (Figure 1).These findings led Nakamura et al. to investigate how PGC7 controls Tet3 activity in zygotes. They showed (in cells that were permeabilized before fixation and immunocytochemistry) that Tet3 was tightly associated only with the paternal pronucleus in WT zygotes, but was present in both pronuclei in PGC7-deficient zygotes. When PGC7 was prevented from binding to the maternal pronucleus by injection of Jhdm2a mRNA, Tet3 became tightly associated with both pronuclei. In other words, loss of PGC7 or loss of H3K9me2 that recruits PGC7 had the same effect – eliminating selective association of Tet3 with the paternal genome. The implication is that PGC7 – which preferentially binds the maternal genome – somehow promotes the selective binding of Tet3 to the paternal genome, thus permitting rapid 5mC oxidation in paternal but not maternal DNA (Figure 1).PGC7 is a small protein (150 amino acids (aa) in the mouse, 159 aa in humans) whose sequence is only moderately conserved. Nakamura et al.¹² showed that the binding of PGC7 to H3K9me2 required the N-terminal half of PGC7, whereas its ability to exclude Tet3 from the maternal pronucleus required the C-terminal half. It is unclear how Tet3 exclusion is mediated. One possibility is that the C-terminal region of PGC7 sterically excludes Tet3 from binding, either to DNA or to a chromatin mark; another is that the C-terminal region of PGC7 is capable of altering chromatin configuration to prevent the binding of Tet3 to chromatin. In support of the latter hypothesis, the rate with which micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digested high-molecular weight chromatin was significantly slower in WT ES cells in which PGC7 was present, compared to PGC7^−/− and G9a^−/− ES cells in which PGC7 was either absent or not recruited to DNA because of the loss of H3K9me2 mark. In contrast, DNA methylation did not alter the chromatin association of PGC7 or its ability to protect high-molecular weight chromatin from MNase digestion, as shown by using Dnmt1^−/−Dnmt3a^−/−Dnmt3b^−/− triple knockout ES cells that completely lack DNA methylation.How does PGC7 protect paternally-imprinted loci from Tet3-mediated 5mC oxidation? Although the haploid sperm genome is mostly packaged with protamine, a genome-wide analysis revealed that 4% of the genome of mature human sperm bears nucleosomes located at developmental and imprinted genes¹⁴. Nakamura et al.¹² found that among paternally-imprinted differentially methylated regions (DMRs), the H19 and Rasgrf1 DMRs contained H3K9me2 whereas the Meg3 DMR did not, consistent with their previous finding that in PGC7-deficient zygotes, the H19 and Rasgrf1 DMRs were hypomethylated but the Meg3 DMR was unaffected¹¹. Therefore, PGC7 may be recruited to paternally-imprinted loci through H3K9me2-containing nucleosomes that pre-exist in the sperm haploid genome upon fertilization. Alternatively, Nakamura et al. point out that protamine in the sperm is replaced soon after fertilization by the histone H3.3 variant, which in somatic cells does not bear H3K9me2 mark.In conclusion, Nakamura et al.¹² demonstrate unambiguously that PGC7 specifically binds to H3K9me2 in the maternal genome in zygotes, where its global occupancy excludes Tet3 and inhibits Tet3-mediated 5mC oxidation. This novel finding provides new insights into the global alterations of DNA methylation status that occur during early embryogenesis. Follow-up questions abound. First, can PGC7 protect other methylated loci such as transposable elements and the X-chromosome? It would be interesting to assess H3K9me2 at these loci. Second, how does the N-terminal half of PGC7 recognize H3K9me2? Structural characterization of this interaction may elucidate a novel epigenetic “reader” domain specific for H3K9me2. Third, PGC7 is a marker for cells of the inner cell mass, and is co-expressed with Tet1 and Tet2 rather than Tet3 in ESCs¹⁵. Does PGC7 also antagonize Tet1 and Tet2 and protect imprinted loci in ESCs? Fourth, how does PGC7 inhibit the access of Tet3 to chromatin? Considering that PGC7 is small and is not equipped with known enzymatic domains, it is likely that PGC-interacting proteins, rather than PGC7 itself, function to regulate chromatin status. Fifth, how is Tet3 recruited to paternal chromatin – are there specific histone or other epigenetic marks that facilitate Tet3 recruitment? Finally, while technically challenging, it seems imperative to identify the target genes of PGC7 and Tet3, by profiling the genomic location of 5hmC and other 5mC oxidation products in the paternal and maternal genomes of zygotes from WT, Tet3-deficient and PGC7-deficient mice.     

The DNA dioxygenase Tet1 regulates H3K27 modification and embryonic stem cell biology independent of its catalytic activity

Tet enzymes (Tet1/2/3) oxidize 5-methylcytosine to promote DNA demethylation and partner with chromatin modifiers to regulate gene expression. Tet1 is highly expressed in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), but its enzymatic and non-enzymatic roles in gene regulation are not dissected. We have generated Tet1 catalytically inactive (Tet1^m/m) and knockout (Tet1^−/−) ESCs and mice to study these functions. Loss of Tet1, but not loss of its catalytic activity, caused aberrant upregulation of bivalent (H3K4me3⁺; H3K27me3⁺) developmental genes, leading to defects in differentiation. Wild-type and catalytic-mutant Tet1 occupied similar genomic loci which overlapped with H3K27 tri-methyltransferase PRC2 and the deacetylase complex Sin3a at promoters of bivalent genes and with the helicase Chd4 at active genes. Loss of Tet1, but not loss of its catalytic activity, impaired enrichment of PRC2 and Sin3a at bivalent promoters leading to reduced H3K27 trimethylation and deacetylation, respectively, in absence of any changes in DNA methylation. Tet1^−/−, but not Tet1^m/m, embryos expressed higher levels of Gata6 and were developmentally delayed. Thus, the critical functions of Tet1 in ESCs and early development are mediated through its non-catalytic roles in regulating H3K27 modifications to silence developmental genes, and are more important than its catalytic functions in DNA demethylation.     

MicroRNA‐29b regulates DNA methylation by targeting Dnmt3a/3b and Tet1/2/3 in porcine early embryo development

MicroRNA‐29b (miR‐29b) is a member of the miR‐29 family, which targets DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and ten eleven translocation enzymes (TETs), thereby regulating DNA methylation. However, the role of miR‐29b in porcine early embryo development has not been reported. In this study, we examined the effects of miR‐29b in porcine in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos to investigate the mechanism by which miR‐29b regulated DNA methylation. The interference of miR‐29b by its special miRNA inhibitor significantly up‐regulated Dnmt3a/b and Tet1 but downregulated Tet2/3; meanwhile it increased DNA methylation levels of the global genome and Nanog promoter region but decreased global DNA demethylation levels. The inhibition of miR‐29b also resulted in a decrease in the development rate and quality of blastocysts. In addition, the pluripotency genes Nanog and Sox2 were significantly downregulated, and the apoptosis genes Bax and Casp3 were upregulated, but anti‐apoptosis gene Bcl‐2 was downregulated in blastocysts. Our study indicated that miR‐29b could regulate DNA methylation mediated by miR29b‐ Dnmt3a/b – Tet1/2/3 signaling during porcine early embryo development.