Is Screening for Cancer Worth While? Results from a Well-woman Clinic for Cancer Detection

1,768 women were screened for breast and cervical cancer in the year May 1968 to April 1969. Clinical examination followed the completion of a simple questionary. Investigations included thermography and mammography of the breast and cytology of the cervical and vaginal smears. Breast cancer was detected in 15 patients (0·85% or 8·5 per 1,000) and none was aware of any abnormality though 13 of the tumours were clinically palpable. Carcinoma in situ of the cervix was found in a further eight (0·45% or 4·5 per 1,000).     

Homogeneous vs. patient specific breast models for Monte Carlo evaluation of mean glandular dose in mammography

PurposeTo compare, via Monte Carlo simulations, homogeneous and non-homogenous breast models adopted for mean glandular dose (MGD) estimates in mammography vs. patient specific digital breast phantoms.MethodsWe developed a GEANT4 Monte Carlo code simulating four homogenous cylindrical breast models featured as follows: (1) semi-cylindrical section enveloped in a 5-mm adipose layer; (2) semi-elliptical section with a 4-mm thick skin; (3) semi-cylindrical section with a 1.45-mm skin layer; (4) semi-cylindrical section in a 1.45-mm skin layer and 2-mm subcutaneous adipose layer. Twenty patient specific digital breast phantoms produced from a dedicated CT scanner were assumed as reference in the comparison. We simulated two spectra produced from two anode/filter combinations. An additional digital breast phantom was produced via BreastSimulator software.ResultsWith reference to the results for patient-specific breast phantoms and for W/Al spectra, models #1 and #3 showed higher MGD values by about 1% (ranges [–33%; +28%] and [−31%; +30%], respectively), while for model #4 it was 2% lower (range [−34%; +26%]) and for model #2 –11% (range [−39%; +14%]), on average. On the other hand, for W/Rh spectra, models #1 and #4 showed lower MGD values by 2% and 1%, while for model #2 and #3 it was 14% and 8% lower, respectively (ranges [−43%; +13%] and [−41%; +21%]). The simulation with the digital breast phantom produced with BreastSimulator showed a MGD overestimation of +33%.ConclusionsThe homogeneous breast models led to maximum MGD underestimation and overestimation of 43% and 28%, respectively, when compared to patient specific breast phantoms derived from clinical CT scans.     

Early diagnosis of breast cancer: experience in a consultant breast clinic.

Of 2839 women referred to a consultant breast clinic for clinical, mammographic and thermographic examination, 480 underwent biopsy and 126 were found to have cancer. Ten percent of the tumours were occult and were classified as very early biologic disease; they were identified by routine mammography in women whose breasts were clinically normal. Biopsy of solid mass lesions non-suspicious on mammography identified 20% of the cancers; half these lesions, classified as early biologic disease, were discovered by doctors at routine annual clinical breast examination, though the earliest cancers were detected by women who were confident and competent in monthly self-examination of the breasts. Biopsy of solid mass lesions suspicious on mammography identified 70% of the cancers; these were classified as late biologic disease. Skin or nipple dimpling or retraction was evident in two thirds of the patients; their lesions seemed to be later biologically than the lesions of the patients without clinical signs, and 75% had discovered the lesions themselves accidentally.     

Screening for breast cancer. Report from Edinburgh Breast Screening Clinic.

As part of a trial to determine the feasibility of screening for breast cancer, 3952 women aged 40--59 years were screened once or more over two years. They represented 82% of those invited by a personal letter from their GPs. Each woman underwent mammography, two clinical examinations, and, usually, thermography. Further investigations included needle aspiration of cysts, xeromammography, and biopsy. Of the 125 women who underwent biopsy, 18 proved to have cancer. Because of the high response rate and consequent large sample of normal women the biopsy and cancer detection rates were low. Clinical examination and mammography together were more effective in detecting significant lesions than either procedure alone, and knowledge of the mammographic findings enabled the examiner to detect more abnormalities. Screening was expensive: each cancer detected cost about 6000 pounds, excluding data processing, surgical, and pathological costs. The clinic has now adopted a more simplified screening regimen, which should reduce costs, but more accurate imaging techniques and ways of identifying high-risk cases are needed.     

Application of Breast Ultrasound in a Mammography-Based Chinese Breast Screening Study

We evaluated the clinical significance of the combined use of mammography + ultrasound as a new breast screening strategy. The inclusion criteria were: (1) females aged >40yrs; (2) breast cancer diagnosis by the breast image screening personnel at FUSCC; (3) screening by both ultrasound and mammography; (4) mammographic/sonographic images analyzed independently by different radiologists; and (5) follow-up for at least 1 year. Fifty-four women were enrolled. The analysis included diagnostic sensitivity of mammography, ultrasound, and mammography + ultrasound. The sensitivities of mammography and mammography + ultrasound were compared overall as well as among different age groups/breast densities. The screening sensitivity of mammography, ultrasound, and mammography + ultrasound was 79.6, 57.4, and 92.6 %, respectively. The difference between mammography and mammography + ultrasound was significant (P < 0.05). The benefit of including ultrasound with mammography as a new breast image screening strategy was found statistically significant in patients with dense breast on mammogram while it was non-significant in younger (<50 years) women. We, therefore, concluded that mammography + ultrasound increased the diagnostic sensitivity of breast screening; hence it was more desirable for women with dense breast on mammography.     

Surface Temperature Distribution of a Breast With and Without Tumour

Abstract

Breast cancer is a common and dreadful disease in women. Regular screening helps in its early detection. At present the most common methods of screening are by self examination and mammography. The surface temperature distribution of the breast can also provide some information on the presence of tumour. This distribution has a relation to the size and location of tumour and can be seen using thermography, where the infrared radiation emitted from the surface of the breast is recorded and a thermal pattern obtained. Thermography is a non-invasive and an inexpensive tool which could be used for early detection. In order to simulate the surface temperature distribution, a two-dimensional model of female breast with and without a carcinoma is considered. The breast is modelled with varying layer thickness close to the actual shape and numerically solved using finite element analysis. Temperature profiles are obtained for a normal breast and for a malignant one by varying the tumour size, location and the blood flow rates. The results show that the surface temperature for a malignant breast is higher than that of a normal one. In addition the size and location of the tumour do have an effect on the surface temperature distribution. It can also be seen that tumour of different sizes placed at the same location would yield the same maximum temperature depending on the blood perfusion rate.     

Mammographic measurements before and after augmentation mammaplasty

Thirty-five augmented women underwent mammography using both the standard implant-compression technique and, when possible, the implant-displacement technique; all had preaugmentation film-screen mammography available for evaluation. The area of mammographically visualized breast tissue before and after augmentation mammaplasty was measured using a transparent grid. Patients with subglandular implants had a mean decrease of 49 percent of measurable tissue area with compression mammography and a 39 percent decrease with displacement mammography. Patients with submuscular implants had a 28 percent decrease in measurable tissue area with compression mammography and a 9 percent decrease with displacement mammography. Anterior breast tissue was seen better with displacement mammography; posterior breast tissue, with compression mammography. Most patients had some degree of parenchymal scarring and lower image quality after augmentation. State-of-the-art mammography was not possible in most patients augmented with silicone-gel-filled implants.     

Surface Temperature Distribution of a Breast With and Without Tumour

Breast cancer is a common and dreadful disease in women. Regular screening helps in its early detection. At present the most common methods of screening are by self examination and mammography. The surface temperature distribution of the breast can also provide some information on the presence of tumour. This distribution has a relation to the size and location of tumour and can be seen using thermography, where the infrared radiation emitted from the surface of the breast is recorded and a thermal pattern obtained. Thermography is a non-invasive and an inexpensive tool which could be used for early detection. In order to simulate the surface temperature distribution, a two-dimensional model of female breast with and without a carcinoma is considered. The breast is modelled with varying layer thickness close to the actual shape and numerically solved using finite element analysis. Temperature profiles are obtained for a normal breast and for a malignant one by varying the tumour size, location and the blood flow rates. The results show that the surface temperature for a malignant breast is higher than that of a normal one. In addition the size and location of the tumour do have an effect on the surface temperature distribution. It can also be seen that tumour of different sizes placed at the same location would yield the same maximum temperature depending on the blood perfusion rate.     

自动乳腺全容积扫描联合乳腺钼靶摄影在乳腺疾病诊断中的价值

目的：探讨自动乳腺全容积扫描（automated breast volume scanner,ABVS）联合乳腺钼靶摄影在乳腺疾病诊断中的价值。方法：观察随访130例就诊我科的乳腺疾病患者,进行ABVS、传统超声和乳腺钼靶检查。结果：130例患者中ABVS的疾病单独诊断准确率为91．5％（119／130）,传统乳腺超声的单独诊断准确率为84．6％（110／130）,乳腺钼靶的单独诊断准确率为86．9％（113／130）,而ABVS联合乳腺钼靶应用的诊断准确率为95．4％（124／130）,明显优于两者单独应用,差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论：ABVS是一种全新的乳腺检查方法,较传统乳腺超声、乳腺钼靶具有较高的疾病诊断准确率,而ABVS联合乳腺钼靶可以显著提高诊断的准确率,值得在临床推广。     

Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s

Background: Evidence is mounting that annual mammography for women in their 40s may be the optimal schedule to reduce morbidity and mortality from breast cancer. Few studies have assessed predictors of repeat mammography on an annual interval among these women. Methods: We assessed mammography screening status among 596 insured Black and Non-Hispanic white women ages 43–49. Adherence was defined as having a second mammogram 10–14 months after a previous mammogram. We examined socio-demographic, medical and healthcare-related variables on receipt of annual-interval repeat mammograms. We also assessed barriers associated with screening. Results: 44.8% of the sample were adherent to annual-interval mammography. A history of self-reported abnormal mammograms, family history of breast cancer and never having smoked were associated with adherence. Saying they had not received mammography reminders and reporting barriers to mammography were associated with non-adherence. Four barrier categories were associated with women's non-adherence: lack of knowledge/not thinking mammograms are needed, cost, being too busy, and forgetting to make/keep appointments. Conclusions: Barriers we identified are similar to those found in other studies. Health professionals may need to take extra care in discussing mammography screening risk and benefits due to ambiguity about screening guidelines for women in their 40s, especially for women without family histories of breast cancer or histories of abnormal mammograms. Reminders are important in promoting mammography and should be coupled with other strategies to help women maintain adherence to regular mammography.     

钼靶X线摄片联合肿瘤相关标志物检测对乳腺癌的诊断价值

目的:探讨乳腺钼靶X射线摄片与血清糖类抗原15-3(CA15-3)、癌胚抗原(CEA)和骨桥蛋白(OPN)联合检测对乳腺癌的临床诊断价值。方法:选择在我院经手术和病理证实为乳腺癌的患者60例作为研究组,另选取60例健康体检者作为对照组。分别检测两组的血清CA15-3、CEA和OPN水平,并采用乳腺钼靶X射线检查。比较X射与血清学检测单独检测及联合检测的阳性率。结果:研究组患者血清CA15-3、CEA及OPN水平均显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);血清CA15-3、CEA、OPN和钼靶X射线摄片联合检测的敏感性显著高于单独检测,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对乳腺癌患者进行钼靶X射线摄片及肿瘤相关标志物检测可提高阳性检出率,有利于乳腺癌的早期诊断及治疗。     

Investigation of the dose distribution for a cone beam CT system dedicated to breast imaging

Cone-beam breast Computed Tomography (bCT) is an X-ray imaging technique for breast cancer diagnosis, in principle capable of delivering a much more homogeneous dose spatial pattern to the breast volume than conventional mammography, at dose levels comparable to two-view mammography. We present an investigation of the three-dimensional dose distribution for a cone-beam CT system dedicated to breast imaging. We employed Monte Carlo simulations for estimating the dose deposited within a breast phantom having a hemiellipsoidal shape placed on a cylinder of 3.5 cm thickness that simulates the chest wall. This phantom represents a pendulant breast in a bCT exam with the average diameter at chest wall, assumed to correspond to a 5-cm-thick compressed breast in mammography. The phantom is irradiated in a circular orbit with an X-ray cone beam selected from four different techniques: 50, 60, 70, and 80 kVp from a tube with tungsten anode, 1.8 mm Al inherent filtration and additional filtration of 0.2 mm Cu. Using the Monte Carlo code GEANT4 we simulated a system similar to the experimental apparatus available in our lab. Simulations were performed at a constant free-in-air air kerma at the isocenter (1 μGy); the corresponding total number of photon histories per scan was 288 million at 80 kVp. We found that the more energetic beams provide a more uniform dose distribution than at low energy: the 50 kVp beam presents a frequency distribution of absorbed dose values with a coefficient of variation almost double than that for the 80 kVp beam. This is confirmed by the analysis of the relative dose profiles along the radial (i.e. parallel to the “chest wall”) and longitudinal (i.e. from “chest wall” to “nipple”) directions. Maximum radial deviations are on the order of 25% for the 80 kVp beam, whereas for the 50 kVp beam variations around 43% were observed, with the lowest dose values being found along the central longitudinal axis of the phantom.     

Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Control Strategies in Central America: The Cases of Costa Rica and Mexico

This paper reports the most cost-effective policy options to support and improve breast cancer control in Costa Rica and Mexico. Total costs and effects of breast cancer interventions were estimated using the health care perspective and WHO-CHOICE methodology. Effects were measured in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted. Costs were assessed in 2009 United States Dollars (US$). To the extent available, analyses were based on locally obtained data. In Costa Rica, the current strategy of treating breast cancer in stages I to IV at a 80% coverage level seems to be the most cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$4,739 per DALY averted. At a coverage level of 95%, biennial clinical breast examination (CBE) screening could improve Costa Rica''s population health twofold, and can still be considered very cost-effective (ICER US$5,964/DALY). For Mexico, our results indicate that at 95% coverage a mass-media awareness raising program (MAR) could be the most cost-effective (ICER US$5,021/DALY). If more resources are available in Mexico, biennial mammography screening for women 50–70 yrs (ICER US$12,718/DALY), adding trastuzumab (ICER US$13,994/DALY) or screening women 40–70 yrs biennially plus trastuzumab (ICER US$17,115/DALY) are less cost-effective options. We recommend both Costa Rica and Mexico to engage in MAR, CBE or mammography screening programs, depending on their budget. The results of this study should be interpreted with caution however, as the evidence on the intervention effectiveness is uncertain. Also, these programs require several organizational, budgetary and human resources, and the accessibility of breast cancer diagnostic, referral, treatment and palliative care facilities should be improved simultaneously. A gradual implementation of early detection programs should give the respective Ministries of Health the time to negotiate the required budget, train the required human resources and understand possible socioeconomic barriers.     

钼靶和超声检查在乳腺癌临床诊断的准确性的比较分析

摘要 目的：比较与分析钼靶和超声检查在乳腺癌临床诊断的准确性。方法：2018年8月到2021年1月选择在本院进行诊治的乳腺肿瘤患者110例作为研究对象,所有患者都给予钼靶和超声检查,记录影像学特征并判断诊断价值。结果：在110例患者中,病理诊断为乳腺良性肿瘤76例、乳腺癌34例。恶性组钼靶的分叶征、钙化、大角征、毛刺征等比例高于良性组,病灶大小也高于良性组(P<0.05)。恶性组超声的形态不规则、边缘不光整、高回声晕、回声衰减、微钙化等比例高于良性组(P<0.05)。钼靶乳腺影像报告及数据系统(Breast imaging report and data system,BI-RADS)判断为乳腺良性肿瘤72例,乳腺癌38例;超声BI-RADS判断为乳腺良性肿瘤75例,乳腺癌35例,钼靶鉴别诊断乳腺癌的敏感性为93.4%,特异性为97.1%,准确性为94.5%;超声鉴别诊断乳腺癌的敏感性为98.7%,特异性为100.0%,准确性为99.1%。多因素logistic回归分析显示病灶大小、分叶征、回声衰减、毛刺征为导致误诊的重要因素(P<0.05)。结论：乳腺癌在钼靶和超声检查中都有明显的征象特征,超声诊断的准确性更高,病灶大小、分叶征、回声衰减、毛刺征为影响诊断效果的很重要因素。     

Budget Impact Analysis of Switching to Digital Mammography in a Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening Program: A Discrete Event Simulation Model

Objective

To assess the budgetary impact of switching from screen-film mammography to full-field digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program.

Methods

A discrete-event simulation model was built to reproduce the breast cancer screening process (biennial mammographic screening of women aged 50 to 69 years) combined with the natural history of breast cancer. The simulation started with 100,000 women and, during a 20-year simulation horizon, new women were dynamically entered according to the aging of the Spanish population. Data on screening were obtained from Spanish breast cancer screening programs. Data on the natural history of breast cancer were based on US data adapted to our population. A budget impact analysis comparing digital with screen-film screening mammography was performed in a sample of 2,000 simulation runs. A sensitivity analysis was performed for crucial screening-related parameters. Distinct scenarios for recall and detection rates were compared.

Results

Statistically significant savings were found for overall costs, treatment costs and the costs of additional tests in the long term. The overall cost saving was 1,115,857€ (95%CI from 932,147 to 1,299,567) in the 10^th year and 2,866,124€ (95%CI from 2,492,610 to 3,239,638) in the 20^th year, representing 4.5% and 8.1% of the overall cost associated with screen-film mammography. The sensitivity analysis showed net savings in the long term.

Conclusions

Switching to digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program saves long-term budget expense, in addition to providing technical advantages. Our results were consistent across distinct scenarios representing the different results obtained in European breast cancer screening programs.     

彩超联合钼靶在未扪及肿块乳腺癌诊断中的应用分析

目的:探讨彩色多普勒超声联合钼靶在未扪及肿块乳腺癌中的临床诊断价值。方法:选取我院乳腺科收治的未扪及肿块乳腺癌患者92例,回顾性分析92例患者术前彩色多普勒超声和钼靶检查结果与手术病理相印证,对比不同的检查方法与病理诊断结果的符合率。结果:单纯彩色多普勒超声检查与单纯钼靶机检查诊断准确率无明显差异(P0.05),而彩色多普勒超声联合钼靶机检查诊断准确率明显高于单纯彩色多普勒超声检查诊断准确率和单纯钼靶机检查诊断准确率,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:彩色多普勒超声联合钼靶能够明显提高未扪及肿块乳腺癌诊断的准确率,对临床具有指导意义,值得临床推广。     

Does genetic counseling have any impact on management of breast cancer risk?

Despite there being an increasing literature on the impact of cancer genetic counseling on risk perception and mental health, there is a lack of data describing impact on risk management. Genetic counseling and testing for cancer predisposition genes aims to improve the future health of those at high risk through appropriate surveillance and screening. However, management of breast cancer risk in women with a family history of this disease is an area of controversy. Counseling services may recommend specific risk management options to women, who then rely on their local screening service to make provision. This study investigated the impact of genetic counseling on management of breast cancer risk in women attending Cancer Family Clinics. A total of 293 women attending four genetic clinics were enrolled. Rates of breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, mammography, biopsy, detected cancers, and other screenings were documented. Participants' perceived benefits and barriers to mammography were assessed along with cancer worry. Results show that rates of mammography, clinical breast examination, and breast self-examination were increased following clinic attendance (p < 0.001). Women in the under 35 age-group had limited access to screening. Rates for biopsy and detected cancers were low. Women reported positive attitudes to mammography, with few reported barriers. Contrary to previous studies, there was no evidence that anxiety about breast cancer impedes uptake of health surveillance methods. Genetic counseling had a positive impact on management of breast cancer risk. Whether this translates into future health gains remains to be established.     

Mammography: a surgeon's experience.

Most reports advocating mammography have been written by radiologists rather than by clinicians who are frequently confronted by women with breast complaints. The value of mammography in managing patients with breast problems was studied by reviewing its role in 1026 breast consultations; there were 129 patients with cancer. Mammography was performed in 95 patients. The procedure hastened the diagnosis of one comedocarcinoma, and in another patient was suspicious 3 years before she presented with a locally advanced lesion. It missed six cancers. In seven patients it recognized clinically obvious cancers, though in one of these it had given negative results 10 months before the patient presented with a lesion 15 cm in diameter. It also falsely suggested the possibility of cancer in 28 women. In the other 52 patients the clinical diagnosis of a benign condition was usually fairly evident. The morbidity caused by mammography does not seem to have been widely appreciated, no doubt because of the hope that clinically unrecognized cancers would be found by it. Most breast problems can be diagnosed without mammography.     

Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations to physicians who provide follow-up care for women who have been treated for early-stage breast cancer. OPTIONS: Combination of blood tests, bone scans, liver echography and chest radiography for detection of distant disease; physical examination with or without mammography for detection of contralateral breast cancer; and physical examination with or without mammography for detection of ipsilateral recurrent disease after breast-conserving therapy. OUTCOMES: Survival, disease recurrence and quality-of-life measures for distant disease, local recurrence of disease and disease in the contralateral breast. EVIDENCE: A MEDLINE search for relevant articles published between January 1966 and January 1998 with the MeSH terms "breast neoplasms" and "neoplasm recurrence" (local and distant) with limits to "human" was done. A subsequent MEDLINE search using the MeSH terms "breast neoplasms," "neoplasm recurrence," "local/diagnosis" and "mammography" was done to address issues of mammography. The literature search was reviewed by a medical librarian and 2 breast cancer specialists to ensure completeness. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Canadian women and is the second leading cause of death after lung cancer. Even with early-stage breast cancer, recurrence after treatment for primary breast cancer is frequent. Traditionally, follow-up has been felt to facilitate early detection and improve survival. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that routine screening (blood tests and diagnostic imaging) for distant disease does not alter survival or quality of life over routine physical examination. In an underpowered secondary analysis of RCT data, the detection of contralateral breast cancer did not affect survival. However, there have been no RCTs examining the role of mammography and physical examination and their effect on survival in the detection of contralateral breast cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of mammography after local excision and radiotherapy is unknown. There have been no RCTs examining the role of mammography or physical examination, or both, and their effect on survival in the detection of ipsilateral breast recurrence. VALUES: The strength of evidence was evaluated using the methods of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. A high value was placed on interventions that changed survival. When evidence was available, high value was also placed on interventions that affected quality of life. RECOMMENDATIONS: There is good evidence not to include blood work and diagnostic imaging as part of screening for distant disease (grade E recommendation). There is no evidence to suggest that mammography decreases mortality by detecting ipsilateral disease in the conservatively treated breast; however, there is indirect evidence that it may be beneficial (grade C recommendation). There is no direct evidence to suggest that physical examination or mammography, or both, should be used to detect contralateral breast cancer; however, there is indirect evidence that it may be beneficial (grade C recommendation). VALIDATION: The findings of this analysis were reviewed through an iterative process by the members of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.     

Mammography in management of breast lesions

Comparison of the clinical and mammography findings in 101 histologically proved breast lesions showed that the accuracy of each method in diagnosing carcinoma was about 90%, but when taken together an accuracy of 98% was reached. Though mammography was less accurate in the diagnosis of benign lesions, it was found to be a valuable complement in the management of a lesion in the large atrophic breast and for showing an impalpable carcinoma. In mammography of the young dense breast a negative result must be interpreted with caution.