Meta-analysis of epidermal growth factor polymorphisms and cancer risk: involving 9,779 cases and 15,932 controls

The epidermal growth factor (EGF) pathway stimulates proliferation and differentiation of epidermal and epithelial tissues, and plays an important role in tumorigenesis. The association between EGF polymorphisms and cancer risk is controversial; thus, we performed this meta-analysis. Overall, 41 case-control studies with 9,779 cases and 15,932 controls were retrieved. We found that EGF +61A/G polymorphism increased overall cancer risk (G allele vs. A allele: OR=1.181, 95% CI=1.077-1.295, P(heterogeneity) < 0.001; GG vs. AA: OR=1.370, 95% CI=1.143-1.641, P(heterogeneity) < 0.001; GG+GA vs. AA: OR=1.175, 95% CI=1.047-1.318, P(heterogeneity) < 0.001). In the stratified analysis by cancer type, the +61?G allele was a risk factor for colorectal cancer, esophageal carcinoma, gastric cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Individuals who carried +61G allele had higher cancer susceptibility in mixed and European racial subgroups. An increased association was detected in the hospital-based subgroup. No significant association was found among EGF -1380A/G, -1744G/A, rs6983267T/G polymorphisms and cancer risk.     

Association between CTLA-4 exon-1 +49A/G polymorphism and systemic lupus erythematosus: an updated analysis

The results of studies on association between CTLA-4 exon-1 +49A/G (rs231775) polymorphism and susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus are controversial. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between the CTLA-4 exon-1 +49A/G polymorphism and SLE, a meta-analysis of 18 published case-control studies was performed. 18 studies meeting our inclusion criteria comprising 1806 SLE cases and 2,490 controls were included. The effect summary odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals were obtained. Publication bias was tested by funnel plot, Egger's test and heterogeneity was assessed. The combined results showed that there were significant differences in genotype distribution between SLE cases and control on the basis of all studies, GG versus AA (OR = 1.53, 95 % CI: 1.12-2.10), GG versus GA/AA (OR = 1.30, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.64), GG versus GA (OR = 1.27, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.55). When stratifying for the race, the phenomenon was found that SLE cases had a significantly higher frequency of GG/GA versus AA (OR = 1.58, 95 % CI: 1.23-2.03), GG versus AA (OR = 1.89, 95 % CI: 1.23-2.91), GG versus GA/AA(OR = 1.39, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.89), GA versus AA(OR = 1.38, 95 % CI: 1.06-1.80) and G versus A(OR = 1.34, 95 % CI: 1.07-1.67) than control in Asians. Our meta-analysis results suggest that CTLA-4 exon-1 +49A/G polymorphism might be a risk factor for SLE susceptibility, at least in Asians. The large sample and well-designed study based on different ethnic groups should be considered in future associated studies to clarify the association of CTLA-4 exon-1 +49A/G polymorphism with SLE susceptibility.     

Lack of an association between -308G>A polymorphism of the TNF-α gene and liver cirrhosis risk based on a meta-analysis

TNF-α is a potential proinflammatory cytokine that plays an important role in the pathogenesis of liver cirrhosis. We investigated a possible association between TNF-α -308G>A polymorphism and liver cirrhosis risk by conducting a meta-analysis. Publications addressing the association between TNF-α -308G>A and liver cirrhosis risk were selected from the Pubmed and Embase databases. Data were extracted from the studies by two independent reviewers; odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated from these data. The meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager Version 5.0.24 and STATA Version 9.2. Eleven studies were retrieved, reporting a total of 1796 liver cirrhosis cases and 2113 healthy controls. A meta-analysis of these 11 studies identified no significant association between TNF-α -308G>A polymorphism and liver cirrhosis risk in all comparisons of G vs A allele; GG vs GA + AA; GG + GA vs AA; GG vs AA; GG vs GA (OR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.85-1.55, P = 0.38; OR = 1.24, 95%CI = 0.87- 1.77, P = 0.24; OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.62-1.30, P = 0.57; OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 0.56-1.89, P = 0.92; OR = 1.30, 95%CI = 0.90-1.88, P = 0.17; respectively). In conclusion, we found no association between TNF-α -308G>A polymorphism and liver cirrhosis risk, both in Caucasian and Asian populations.     

Three genetic polymorphisms of homocysteine-metabolizing enzymes and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis based on 23 case-control studies

Many epidemiological studies have explored the relationships between three genetic polymorphisms of genes encoding homocysteine-metabolizing enzymes (methionine synthase [MTR] A2756G, methionine synthase reductase [MTRR] A66G, and N(5),N(10)-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase [MTHFR] A1298C) and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), but no conclusive results were obtained. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of 23 case-control studies. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to examine the strength of the associations. Among those primary studies, 22 studies were for Europeans, and one study focused on the MTR A2756G polymorphism in Asians. The results of combined analyses of the MTR A2756G polymorphism suggested that the G allele was associated with increased risk of CHD and myocardial infarction (MI) especially for Europeans (GG vs. AA for CHD: OR [95% CI]=1.63 [1.18-2.25], p(z)(-test)=0.001, p(heterogeneity)=0.274; GG+AG vs. AA for MI: OR [95% CI]=1.44 [1.08-1.93], p(z)(-test)=0.014, p(heterogeneity)=0.611). In addition, the G allele was also associated with higher risk CHD based on population-based case-control studies (PCC) (GG vs. AA: OR [95% CI]=1.75 [1.24-2.49], p(z)(-test)=0.002, p(heterogeneity)=0.316). The results suggested that the MTRR A66G polymorphism was not associated with risk of CHD for Europeans (AA vs. GG: OR [95% CI]=1.07 [0.59-1.94], p(z)(-test)=0.831, p(heterogeneity)<0.01). The results suggested that the C allele of the MTHFR A1298C polymorphism might be associated with the increased risk of MI for Europeans (CC vs. CA+AA: OR [95% CI]=1.37 [1.03-1.84], p(z)(-test)=0.033, p(heterogeneity)=0.668). However, when subgroup analyses for sources of controls were performed, conflicting results were obtained. The results suggested that the C allele was associated with decreased risk of CHD based on hospital-based case-control studies, but associated with increased risk of CHD based on PCC. This meta-analysis suggests that MTR A2756G polymorphism, but not MTRR A66G and MTHFR A1298C, is associated with risk of CHD for Europeans. Because of limitations and potential bias, more well-designed studies with larger sample size, especially focused on Asians and Africans, should be performed in the future.     

Polymorphism of vascular endothelial growth factor −1154G>A (rs1570360) with cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 16 case–control studies

Published data on the association of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) −1154G>A polymorphism with cancer risk is inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of association between VEGF −1154G>A polymorphism and the risk of cancer, we performed a meta-analysis of 7,071 cancer cases and 7,693 controls from 16 published case–control studies. Our meta-analysis didn’t reveal an association between VEGF −1154G>A polymorphism and overall cancer risk (GG vs. AA: OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.96–1.20; GA vs. AA: OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.93–1.17; recessive model: GG+GA vs. AA: OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.95–1.18; dominant model: GG vs. GA+AA, OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00–1.24). Nevertheless, for non-Caucasians, GG homozygote may have higher cancer risk compared with either A carriers (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.12–2.23) or AA homozygote (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17–1.76). No significant heterogeneity was detected except in the dominant model and “prostate cancer” subgroup analysis. More studies with larger samples are warranted to confirm these findings.     

Leptin rs2167270 G > A (G19A) polymorphism may decrease the risk of cancer: A case-control study and meta-analysis involving 19 989 subjects

Accumulating evidence has suggested that leptin (LEP) is very important for the development of cancer. Recently, a number of case-control studies about the relationship of the rs2167270 G > A (G19A) variants in the LEP gene with the risk of cancer have yielded inconsistent results. In this study, we have carried out a case-control study [1063 esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EGJA) cases and 1677 controls] in a Chinese population. Furthermore, we carried out a pooled-analysis of 13 studies involving 8059 cancer patients and 11 930 controls to assess whether the LEP G19A locus was associated with overall cancer susceptibility. Odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were harnessed to evaluate the potential association. In our case-control study, we found an association between the carriers of LEP 19A allele and EGJA risk. In addition, the results of meta-analysis also suggested significant associations with cancer risk (A vs G: OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.88–0.97, P = 0.001; AA vs GG: OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74–0.93, P = 0.001, GA/AA vs GG: OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88–0.99, P = 0.023 and AA vs GG/GA: OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74–0.92, P < 0.001). Upon conducting a stratified analysis, we found that LEP 19A allele might decrease the susceptibility of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and colorectal cancer (CRC). In a stratified-by-ethnicity analysis, significant associations were also found in Asians, Caucasians, and mixed populations. We can conclude that the LEP G19A polymorphism constitutes a decreased risk of cancer.     

The E-cadherin (CDH1) -C160A polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

E-cadherin, encoded by the CDH1 gene, involves in invasion and metastasis of cancer cells. CDH1 -C160A polymorphism was shown to contribute to genetic susceptibility to colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the results from different studies remain controversial. This study was conducted to further explore the association between CDH1 -C160A genetic polymorphism and CRC susceptibility by means of a meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all case-control studies of CDH1 -C160A polymorphism and risk for CRC. A total of nine eligible studies, including 7954 CRC cases and 7369 controls, were identified to the meta-analysis. On the whole, the meta-analysis indicated that CDH1 -C160A genetic polymorphism could reduce the risk of CRC under AA versus CC contrast (odds ratio [OR]=0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.75-0.98, p(heterogeneity)=0.11), recessive model (OR=0.88, 95% CI=0.77-0.99, p(heterogeneity)=0.23), dominant model (OR=0.92, 95% CI=0.87-0.99, p(heterogeneity)=0.11), and allele A versus allele C contrast (OR=0.93, 95% CI=0.88-0.98, p(heterogeneity)=0.26). A conclusion could be drawn from the research that CDH1 -C160A polymorphism provides a possible protection against CRC, which is especially evident in Caucasian and hospital populations.     

Toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms in cancer: a meta-analysis

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is critical in the recognition of Gram-negative bacteria serving as a key immune system effector. Recently, a number of case-control studies were conducted to investigate the association between TLR4 gene polymorphism and cancer risk, especially Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms. However, published data were still conflicting. In this paper, we summarized 9463 cancer cases and 10,825 controls from 22 studies and attempted to assess the susceptibility of TLR4 gene polymorphism to cancers by a synthetical meta-analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the relationship. Our results suggested that Asp299Gly represented a risk factor on cancers in digestive system (G allele versus A allele, OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.02-2.64; GA+GG versus AA, OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.00-2.71) but tend to have a protective effect on prostate cancer (GG versus AA, OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.98; GG versus GA+AA, OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.98). Thr399Ile polymorphism was significantly associated with an elevated cancer risk in overall analysis (T allele versus C allele, OR=1.72, 95% CI: 1.27-2.33; TC versus CC, OR=1.63, 95% CI: 1.18-2.26; TT+TC versus CC, OR=1.70, 95% CI: 1.24-2.34) and especially in gastrointestinal subgroup (T allele versus C allele, OR=2.01, 95% CI: 1.40-2.89; TC versus CC, OR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.26-2.74; TT+TC versus CC, OR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.35-2.88). Further prospective researches with larger numbers of worldwide participants are warranted to draw comprehensive and true conclusions.     

Association between CASP3 polymorphisms and overall cancer risk: A meta-analysis of case-control studies

Several studies inspected the relationship between caspase-3 (CASP3) polymorphisms and the risk of several human cancers, but the findings remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis aiming to inspect the association between CASP3 rs1049216 T>C, rs12108497 C>T, rs4647603 G>A, rs4647602 C>A, rs6948 T>G, rs2705897 A>C, and rs113420705 G>A polymorphisms and cancer risk. Eligible studies were recognized by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to quantitatively evaluate the association between each polymorphism of CASP3 and cancer risk. The rs4647603 variant significantly increased the risk of cancer in an overdominant (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03-2.01; P = 0.03; AG vs AA+GG) inheritance model. Regarding the rs4647602 variant, the findings revealed that this variant was associated with protection against cancer in homozygous codominant (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56-0.80; P < 0.00001; AA vs CC), dominant (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96; P = 0.009; AC+AA vs CC), recessive (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.79; P < 0.00001; AA vs AC+CC), and allele (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88; P = 0.00001; A vs C) models. The findings suggested that the rs2705897 variant significantly decreased the risk of cancer in heterozygous codominant (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94; P = 0.009; AC vs AA), dominant (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P = 0.009; AC+CC vs AA), overdominant (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.95; P = 0.01; AC vs CC+AA), and allele (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.97; P = 0.02; C vs A) models. The results did not support an association between CASP3 rs1049216 and rs6948 polymorphisms and cancer risk. In summary, the findings of this meta-analysis support an association between CASP3 polymorphisms and cancer risk. Larger and well-designed studies are desired to evaluate these associations in detail.     

Association Study of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in XRCC1 Gene with the Risk of Gastric Cancer in Chinese Population

Gastric cancer is one of highly cancer-related deaths in the world. Previous evidence suggests that the X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 gene (XRCC1) is one of the most important candidate genes for influencing gastric cancer risk. The objective of this study was to detect the potential association of genetic variants in XRCC1 gene with gastric cancer risk in Chinese Han population. In total, we enrolled 395 gastric cancer patients and 398 cancer-free controls in this study. The genotyping of c.910A>G and c.1804C>A genetic variants in XRCC1 gene were investigate by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and created restriction site-PCR (CRS-PCR) methods, respectively. We found the genotypes/alleles from these two genetic variants were statistically associated with the increased risk of gastric cancer (for c.910A>G, GG versus (vs.) AA: OR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.21-3.31; AG vs. AA: OR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.12-2.02; GG/AG vs. AA: OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.20-2.10; GG vs. AG/AA: OR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.03-2.73; G vs. A: OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.18-1.83; for c.1804C>A, AA vs. CC: OR = 2.68, 95% CI 1.46-4.94; AA vs. CA/CC: OR = 2.62, 95% CI 1.44-4.76; A vs. C: OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.06-1.66). The allele-G of c.910A>G and allele-A of c.1804C>A genetic variants may contribute to gastric cancer susceptibility. These preliminary results indicate that these XRCC1 genetic variants are potentially related to gastric cancer susceptibility in Chinese Han population, and might be used as molecular markers.     

Association of excision repair cross-complimentary group 1 gene polymorphisms with breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility

The role of excision repair cross-complimentary group 1 (ERCC1) gene polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancer development has long been controversial and existing data were inconsistent. Here, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to better clarify the association. Case-control studies published from December 2008 to November 2018 were assessed. The statistical analyses of the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Fifteen articles with 24 case-control studies and 3 ERCC1 polymorphisms were enrolled. A total of 20 923 participants including 9896 cases and 11 027 controls were analyzed. The results showed that C to T variation in the ERCC1 rs11615 (C/T) polymorphisms was correlated with breast cancer susceptibility (T vs C: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.02-1.38; TT + CT vs CC: OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.12-1.36). ERCC1 rs3212986 (C/A) polymorphisms posed an increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer as whole (A vs C: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01-1.25; AA + CA vs CC: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.22), and presented especially higher risk for ovarian cancer (A vs C: OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.05-1.63; AA vs CA + CC: OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.12-2.47; AA vs CC: OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.12-2.64). Meanwhile, neither overall group analyses nor stratified analyses displayed any association of ERCC1 rs2298881 (A/C) polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. This meta-analysis suggested that ERCC1 rs11615 (C/T) polymorphisms were associated with breast cancer susceptibility and rs3212986 (C/A) polymorphisms were especially correlated with ovarian cancer risk. More case-control studies with well-adjusted data and diverse populations are essential for validation of our conclusion.     

Lack of association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene A1298C polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility

Published data on the association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR) A1298C polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between the MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and breast cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for co-dominant model (AC vs. AA, CC vs. AA), dominant model (CC+AC vs. AA), and recessive model (CC vs. AC+AA), respectively. A total of 26 studies including 12,244 cases and 15,873 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and breast cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis (AC vs. AA: OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.05; CC vs. AA: OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.09; dominant model: OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.04; and recessive model: OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.90-1.08). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity or study design, still no significant associations were found for all comparison models. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the MTHFR A1298C polymorphism may be not associated with breast cancer development. However, large sample and representative population-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding.     

Polymorphisms in the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 gene and acute rejection risk in transplant recipients

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) gene polymorphisms have been reported to influence the risk for acute rejection (AR) in transplant recipients. However, the results still remain controversial and ambiguous. The objective of the current study was to conduct a meta-analysis investigating the association between polymorphisms in the CTLA-4 gene and the risk of AR in transplant recipients. Electronic searches for all publications were conducted on associations between this variant and acute rejection in Medline and Embase databases through November 2011. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the strength of the association. Three polymorphisms (+49 adenine/guanine [+49A/G], -318 cytosine/thymine [-318C/T], and the +6230G/A polymorphism [CT60]) in 18 case-control studies from ten articles were analyzed. This meta-analysis included 2,081 cases of transplant recipients in which 813 cases developed AR and 1,268 cases did not develop AR. The results indicated that there was no statistically significant association between the risk of AR and the +49A/G polymorphism or the -318C/T polymorphism (+49A/G: OR = 0.876, 95 % CI = 0.650-1.180 for GG vs. AA; OR = 1.121, 95 % CI = 0.911-1.379 for AG + GG vs. AA; -318C/T: OR = 0.397, 95 % CI = 0.138-1.143 for TT vs. CC; OR = 0.987, 95 %CI = 0.553-1.760 for CT + TT vs. CC). However, individuals who carried CT60 A allele might have a decreased risk of AR (AA vs. GG OR = 0.535, 95 % CI = 0.340-0.841, A vs. G OR = 0.759, 95 % CI = 0.612-0.914) in liver transplant recipients among Europeans, but because only two studies were included, so the result should be caution. In further stratified analyses for the +49A/G and the -318C/T polymorphisms, no obvious significant associations were found in subgroups of renal transplant recipients and Europeans, a reduced incidence of acute rejection was observed in liver transplant recipients that are homogenous for +49G (OR = 0.638, 95 % CI = 0.427-0.954 for GG vs. AA/AG), while this has not been observed in renal transplant recipients. Overall this meta-analysis suggests that +49A/G and the -318C/T polymorphisms in CTLA-4 may be not associated with the risk of rejection after organ transplantation, but CTLA +49A/G and +6230G/A polymorphisms may be associated with acute rejection after liver transplantation, not after renal transplantation. In future, more studies should be included to evaluate the association between +6230G/A polymorphism and AR risk.     

Genetic association between IL-27 rs153109 polymorphism and cancer risk in Chinese population: a meta-analysis

IL-27 plays an important role in anti-cancer activity. The -964A/G polymorphism in IL-27 gene has been implicated in susceptibility to cancer, but the results were conflicting. The aim of this study was to assess the association between this polymorphism and cancer risk. Pubmed and Wanfang database were searched for all publications concerning IL-27 -964A/G polymorphism and cancer risk. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the strength of association. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 11.0 software. A total of eight case–control studies including 2044 cancer cases and 2197 controls were identified. Overall, significant association between IL-27 -964A/G polymorphism and cancer risk was observed (GG versus AA: OR?=?1.26, 95% CI?=?1.03–1.52; GG versus AG?+?AA: OR?=?1.20, 95% CI?=?1.00–1.44). In subgroup analysis based on cancer type, significant association was found in colorectal cancer (GG versus AA: OR?=?1.55, 95% CI?=?1.07–2.27; AG versus AA: OR?=?1.31, 95% CI?=?1.02–1.67). The current meta-analysis suggests that IL-27 -964A/G polymorphism might enhance cancer risk. However, large-scale and well-designed studies are still needed to confirm the result of our meta-analysis. The association of IL-27 polymorphism with colorectal cancer may provide insight for future therapies.     

IL-10 Gene Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-Analysis

Background

A number of observational studies have been conducted to investigate the association of the IL-10 gene polymorphisms with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) susceptibility. However, their results are conflicting.

Method

We searched published case-control studies on the IL-10 polymorphisms and SLE in PubMed, EMBASE and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. A meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed-effect or random-effect model based on between-study heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 42 studies with 7948 cases and 11866 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Among Caucasians, the CA27 allele of the IL10.G microsatellites (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.01–5.62), the G allele of the IL-10 -1082G/A polymorphism (G vs. A: OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02–1.44; GG vs. AA: OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.16–1.82; GG+GA vs. AA: OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03–1.29) and its associated haplotype -1082G/−819C/−592C (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10–1.42) were associated with increased SLE susceptibility without or with unimportant between-study heterogeneity. Removing studies deviating from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) hardly changed these results. Among Asians, the CA21 allele of the IL-10.G microsatellites (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02–1.60) and the -1082G/−819C/−592C haplotype (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.00–1.53) were associated with increased SLE susceptibility, but with substantial between-study heterogeneity or sensitive to HWE status. Removing studies deviating from HWE also produced statistically significant associations of the IL-10 -1082G/A (GG vs. AA: OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.24–8.28; GG vs. AA+GA: OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.19–6.79) and -592C/A polymorphisms (CC+CA vs. AA: OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51–0.94) with SLE among Asians.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed that the IL10.G microsatellites, the IL-10 -1082G/A and -592C/A polymorphisms and the haplotype -1082G/−819C/−592C are associated with SLE susceptibility. Besides, this is the first time to report an association between the CA27 allele of the IL-10.G microsatellites and SLE among Caucasians. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.     

Methionine synthase reductase A66G polymorphism contributes to tumor susceptibility: evidence from 35 case–control studies

Methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) gene is involved in tumorigenesis by regulating DNA methylation through activation of methionine synthase (MTR). MTRR is polymorphic at nucleotide 66 (A-to-G) and the resulting variant enzyme has a lower affinity for MTR. The reported associations of MTRR A66G polymorphism with cancer risk are contradictory. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to better assess the associations, including 18,661 cases and 27,678 controls from 35 studies. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between the MTRR A66G polymorphism and cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for homozygote model (GG vs. AA), heterozygote model (GG vs. GA), recessive genetic model (GG vs. GA + AA), and dominant genetic model (GG + GA vs. AA), respectively. Overall, results indicated that the G allele and GG variant genotypes were associated with a significantly increased cancer risk (G vs. A: OR, 1.039; 95% CI, 1.009–1.078; homozygote model: OR, 1.094; 95% CI, 1.006–1.191). In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant increased risks were found among Asians with G allele (G vs. A: OR, 1.063; 95% CI, 1.011–1.119; homozygote model: OR, 1.189; 95% CI, 1.055–1.341; recessive model: OR, 1.197; 95% CI, 1.068–1.341). For stratification analysis, the cancer types with fewer than three studies were categorized into “other cancers”, and the results indicated that there was a significant elevated cancer risk in “other cancers” in all genetic models, not in colorectal cancer, lymphoid leukemia or breast cancer. In summary, our study suggests that the MTRR A66G polymorphism is a potential biomarker for cancer risk.     

Quantitative assessment of the association between TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism and cancer risk

The findings regarding the relation of transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) to cancer risk have been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the association between TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility. A meta-analysis of nine investigations with 2800 cases and 1620 controls was conducted to gain a better understanding of the effect of TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism on cancer risk. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the strength of the correlation between TAP2 gene polymorphism and cancer susceptibility. The pooled results from TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism showed a decreased risk of cancer in two dominant genetic models (GG + AG vs AA: OR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75-0.99; AG vs AA: OR = 0.85, 95% CI, 0.73-0.99). From the subgroup analysis, decreased cancer susceptibility was found in Caucasians (GG + AG vs AA: OR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.68-0.99), especially among the subgroup of cervical carcinoma (GG + AG vs AA: OR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69-0.96; AG vs AA: OR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.70-0.99). Overall, the results suggest that TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism contributes to decreased cancer susceptibility.     

APEX Nuclease (Multifunctional DNA Repair Enzyme) 1 Gene Asp148Glu Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis Involving 58 Articles and 48903 Participants

Background

Polymorphisms in the APEX nuclease (multifunctional DNA repair enzyme) 1 gene (APEX1) may be involved in the carcinogenesis by affecting DNA repair. We aimed to summarize available data on the association of the APEX1 Asp148Glu (rs1130409) polymorphism with risk of multiple types of cancer via a meta-analysis.

Methods and Results

In total, 58 qualified articles including 22,398 cancer patients and 26,505 controls were analyzed, and the data were extracted independently by two investigators. Analyses of the full data set indicated a marginally significant association of the APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphism with cancer risk under allelic (odds ratio (OR)=1.05; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.99-1.11; P=0.071), dominant (OR=1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.17; P=0.028), and heterozygous genotypic (OR=1.08; 95% CI: 1.01-1.16; P=0.026) models, with significant heterogeneity and publication bias. In subgroup analyses by cancer type, with a Bonferroni corrected alpha of 0.05/6, significant association was observed for gastric cancer under both dominant (OR=1.74; 95% CI: 1.2-2.51; P=0.003) and heterozygous genotypic (OR=1.66; 95% CI: 1.2-2.31; P=0.002) models. In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, risk estimates were augmented in Caucasians, especially under dominant (OR=1.11; 95% CI: 1.0-1.24; P=0.049) and heterozygous genotypic (OR=1.11; 95% CI: 0.99-1.24; P=0.063) models. By study design, there were no significant differences between population-based and hospital-based studies. In subgroup analysis by sample size, risk estimates were remarkably overestimated in small studies, and no significance was reached in large studies except under the heterozygous genotypic model (OR=1.23; 95% CI: 1.06-1.43; P=0.006, significant at a Bonferroni corrected alpha of 0.05/2). By quality score, the risk estimates, albeit nonsignificant, were higher in low-quality studies than in high-quality studies. Further meta-regression analyses failed to identify any contributory confounders for the associated risk estimates.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphism might be a genetic risk factor for the development of gastric cancer. Further investigations on large populations are warranted.     

Association of the CYP1B1 Leu432Val polymorphism with the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

Cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) is a key P450 enzyme involved in the metabolism of exogenous and endogenous substrates in endocrine-mediated tumors such as prostate cancer. The potential significance of nonsynonymous SNP Leu432Val (rs1056836) as a risk factor in prostate cancer has been extensively studied. The objective of this meta-analysis was to quantitatively summarize the association between CYP1B1 Leu432Val polymorphism and prostate cancer. All eligible studies were searched and acquired from the PubMed and ISI databases. Statistical analysis was performed by using the software STATA 11.0. Ten case-controlled studies from nine eligible publications were identified, which includes 6,668 subjects with 3,221 cases and 3,447 controls. Overall, no significant association was found between the CYP1B1 Leu432Val polymorphism and prostate cancer susceptibility for Val/Val vs Leu/Leu (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.79-1.44; P = 0.67), Leu/Val vs Leu/Leu (OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.94-1.17; P = 0.42), Leu/Val + Val/Val vs Leu/Leu (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.91-1.26; P = 0.40) and Val/Val vs Leu/Val + Leu/Leu (OR = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.86-1.44; P = 0.43). However, a higher risk was found among Asians in all genetic models (Val/Val vs Leu/Leu :OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.14-5.39, P = 0.02; Leu/Val vs Leu/Leu: OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.03-1.89, P = 0.03; Leu/Val + Val/Val vs Leu/Leu: OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.14-2.01, P = 0.004; Val/Val vs Leu/Val + Leu/Leu: OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.35-4.56, P = 0.004). We were not able to detect any association in the subgroup analysis by source of controls and genotyping method in all genetic models. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides evidence that CYP1B1 Leu432Val polymorphism is not associated with prostate cancer risk overall with the exception in Asians.     

The -607C/A Polymorphisms in Interleukin-18 Gene Promoter Contributes to Cancer Risk: Evidence from A Meta-Analysis of 22 Case-Control Studies

Background

Several observational studies have investigated the association between -607 C/A polymorphism of IL-18 gene and cancer risk; however, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation of the association to help us better understand the relationship between -607 C/A polymorphism of IL-18 gene promoter and risk of cancer.

Methods

A literature search was carried out using PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database between January 1966 and February 2013. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used to estimate the pooled odds ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 22 case-control studies including 4100 cancer cases and 4327 controls contributed to the analysis. Significant association between -607C/A polymorphism in IL-18 gene promoter and cancer risk was observed (CA vs CC:OR =1.221, 95% CI: 1.096, 1.360; P_{heterogeneity}=0.219; AA/CA vs. CC:OR =1.203, 95% CI: 1.057, 1.369; P_{heterogeneity}=0.064). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, -607C/A polymorphism significantly increased risk of cancer among Asian population (AA/CA vs. CC:OR =1.197, 95% CI: 1.023,1.401; P_{heterogeneity}=0.088); however, no significant association was found in Caucasian or African population. The -607C/A polymorphism was associated with a significantly increased risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA vs CC:OR =1.330, 95% CI: 1.029,1.719; P_{heterogeneity}=0.704; AA/CA vs. CC:OR =1.323, 95% CI: 1.037,1.687; P_{heterogeneity}=0.823) and esophageal cancer (AA/CA vs. CC:OR =1.289, 95% CI: 1.002,1.658; P_{heterogeneity}=0.700).

Conclusions

The present meta-analysis suggests that the -607C/A polymorphisms in IL-18 gene promoter is associated with a significantly increased risk of cancer, especially for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and esophageal cancer and in Asian population. More studies with larger sample size, well controlled confounding factors are warranted to validate this association.