G protein betagamma11 complex translocation is induced by Gi, Gq and Gs coupling receptors and is regulated by the alpha subunit type

G protein activation by Gi/Go coupling M2 muscarinic receptors, Gq coupling M3 receptors and Gs coupling beta2 adrenergic receptors causes rapid reversible translocation of the G protein gamma11 subunit from the plasma membrane to the Golgi complex. Co-translocation of the beta1 subunit suggests that gamma11 translocates as a betagamma complex. Pertussis toxin ADP ribosylation of the alphai subunit type or substitution of the C terminal domain of alphao with the corresponding region of alphas inhibits gamma11 translocation demonstrating that alpha subunit interaction with a receptor and its activation are requirements for the translocation. The rate of gamma11 translocation is sensitive to the rate of activation of the G protein alpha subunit. alpha subunit types that show high receptor activated rates of guanine nucleotide exchange in vitro support high rates of gamma11 translocation compared to alpha subunit types that have a relatively lower rate of guanine nucleotide exchange. The results suggest that the receptor induced translocation of gamma11 is controlled by the rate of cycling of the G protein through active and inactive forms. They also demonstrate that imaging of gamma11 translocation can be used as a non-invasive tool to measure the relative activities of wild type or mutant receptor and alpha subunit types in a live cell.     

Selective role of G protein gamma subunits in receptor interaction

Receptor stimulation of nucleotide exchange in a heterotrimeric G protein (alphabetagamma) is the primary event-modulating signaling by G proteins. The molecular mechanisms at the basis of this event and the role of the G protein subunits, especially the betagamma complex, in receptor activation are unclear. In a reconstituted system, a purified muscarinic receptor, M2, activates G protein heterotrimers alphai2beta1gamma5 and alphai2beta1gamma7 with equal efficacy. However, when the alpha subunit type is substituted with alphao, alphaobeta1gamma7 shows a 100% increase in M2-stimulated GTP hydrolysis compared with alphaobeta1gamma5. Using a sensitive assay based on betagamma complex stimulation of phospholipase C activity, we show that both beta1gamma5 and beta1gamma7 form heterotrimers equally well with alphao and alphai. These results indicate that the gamma subunit interaction with a receptor is critical for modulating nucleotide exchange and is influenced by the subunit-type composition of the heterotrimer.     

Receptor- and nucleotide exchange-independent mechanisms for promoting G protein subunit dissociation

Mechanisms for heterotrimeric G protein activation that do not rely on G protein coupled receptor activation are becoming increasingly apparent. We recently identified beta gamma subunit-binding peptides that we proposed bound to a "hot spot" on beta gamma subunits, stimulating G protein dissociation without stimulating nucleotide exchange and activating G protein signaling in intact cells. AGS3, a member of the activators of G protein signaling family of proteins, also activates G protein signaling in a nucleotide exchange-independent manner, and AGS3 homologues are involved in asymmetric cell division during development. Here we demonstrate that a consensus G protein regulatory (GPR) peptide from AGS3 and related proteins is sufficient to induce G protein subunit dissociation and that both the GPR and hot spot-binding peptides promote dissociation to extents comparable with a known G protein activator, AMF. Peptides derived from adenylyl cyclase 2 and GRK2 prevented formation of the heterotrimeric complex but did not alter the rate of alpha subunit dissociation from beta gamma subunits. These data indicate that these nucleotide exchange-independent G protein activator peptides do not simply compete for alpha interactions with beta gamma subunits, but actively promote subunit dissociation. Thus, we propose two novel mechanisms for nucleotide exchange independent activation of G protein signaling, one that involves conformational changes in the alpha subunit and one that involves conformational changes in the beta gamma subunits.     

Rhodopsin controls a conformational switch on the transducin gamma subunit

Rhodopsin, a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor, catalyzes the activation of a heterotrimeric G protein, transducin, to initiate a visual signaling cascade in photoreceptor cells. The betagamma subunit complex, especially the C-terminal domain of the transducin gamma subunit, Gtgamma(60-71)farnesyl, plays a pivotal role in allosteric regulation of nucleotide exchange on the transducin alpha subunit by light-activated rhodopsin. We report that this domain is unstructured in the presence of an inactive receptor but forms an amphipathic helix upon rhodopsin activation. A K65E/E66K charge reversal mutant of the gamma subunit has diminished interactions with the receptor and fails to adopt the helical conformation. The identification of this conformational switch provides a mechanism for active GPCR utilization of the betagamma complex in signal transfer to G proteins.     

Dual lipid modification motifs in G(alpha) and G(gamma) subunits are required for full activity of the pheromone response pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

To establish the biological function of thioacylation (palmitoylation), we have studied the heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein) subunits of the pheromone response pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The yeast G protein gamma subunit (Ste18p) is unusual among G(gamma) subunits because it is farnesylated at cysteine 107 and has the potential to be thioacylated at cysteine 106. Substitution of either cysteine results in a strong signaling defect. In this study, we found that Ste18p is thioacylated at cysteine 106, which depended on prenylation of cysteine 107. Ste18p was targeted to the plasma membrane even in the absence of prenylation or thioacylation. However, G protein activation released prenylation- or thioacylation-defective Ste18p into the cytoplasm. Hence, lipid modifications of the G(gamma) subunit are dispensable for G protein activation by receptor, but they are required to maintain the plasma membrane association of G(betagamma) after receptor-stimulated release from G(alpha). The G protein alpha subunit (Gpa1p) is tandemly modified at its N terminus with amide- and thioester-linked fatty acids. Here we show that Gpa1p was thioacylated in vivo with a mixture of radioactive myristate and palmitate. Mutation of the thioacylation site in Gpa1p resulted in yeast cells that displayed partial activation of the pathway in the absence of pheromone. Thus, dual lipidation motifs on Gpa1p and Ste18p are required for a fully functional pheromone response pathway.     

G protein betagamma complex translocation from plasma membrane to Golgi complex is influenced by receptor gamma subunit interaction

On activation of a receptor the G protein betagamma complex translocates away from the receptor on the plasma membrane to the Golgi complex. The rate of translocation is influenced by the type of gamma subunit associated with the G protein. Complementary approaches--imaging living cells expressing fluorescent protein tagged G proteins and assaying reconstituted receptors and G proteins in vitro--were used to identify mechanisms at the basis of the translocation process. Translocation of Gbetagamma containing mutant gamma subunits with altered prenyl moieties showed that the differences in the prenyl moieties were not sufficient to explain the differential effects of geranylgeranylated gamma5 and farnesylated gamma11 on the translocation process. The translocation properties of Gbetagamma were altered dramatically by mutating the C terminal tail region of the gamma subunit. The translocation characteristics of these mutants suggest that after receptor activation, Gbetagamma retains contact with a receptor through the gamma subunit C terminal domain and that differential interaction of the activated receptor with this domain controls Gbetagamma translocation from the plasma membrane.     

G Protein beta subunit types differentially interact with a muscarinic receptor but not adenylyl cyclase type II or phospholipase C-beta 2/3

In comparison with the alpha subunit of G proteins, the role of the beta subunit in signaling is less well understood. During the regulation of effectors by the betagamma complex, it is known that the beta subunit contacts effectors directly, whereas the role of the beta subunit is undefined in receptor-G protein interaction. Among the five G protein beta subunits known, the beta(4) subunit type is the least studied. We compared the ability of betagamma complexes containing beta(4) and the well characterized beta(1) to stimulate three different effectors: phospholipase C-beta2, phospholipase C-beta3, and adenylyl cyclase type II. beta(4)gamma(2) and beta(1)gamma(2) activated all three of these effectors with equal efficacy. However, nucleotide exchange in a G protein constituting alpha(o)beta(4)gamma(2) was stimulated significantly more by the M2 muscarinic receptor compared with alpha(o)beta(1)gamma(2). Because alpha(o) forms heterotrimers with beta(4)gamma(2) and beta(1)gamma(2) equally well, these results show that the beta subunit type plays a direct role in the receptor activation of a G protein.     

Receptor activation of G proteins

G proteins are a highly conserved family of membrane-associated proteins composed of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits. The alpha subunit, which is unique for each G protein, binds GDP or GTP. Receptors such as those for beta- and alpha-adrenergic catecholamines, muscarinic agonists, and the retinal photoreceptor rhodopsin, catalyze the exchange of GDP for GTP binding to the alpha subunit of a specific G protein. G alpha.GTP regulates appropriate effector enzymes such as adenylyl cyclase or the cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase. The beta gamma-subunit complex of G proteins is required for efficient receptor-catalyzed alpha subunit guanine nucleotide exchange and also functions as an attenuator of alpha subunit activation of effector enzymes. Recent elucidation of both receptor and G protein primary sequence has allowed structural predictions and new experimental approaches to study the mechanism of receptor-catalyzed G protein regulation of specific effector systems and the control of cell function including metabolism, secretion, and growth.     

Gbetagamma inhibits Galpha GTPase-activating proteins by inhibition of Galpha-GTP binding during stimulation by receptor

Gbetagamma subunits modulate several distinct molecular events involved with G protein signaling. In addition to regulating several effector proteins, Gbetagamma subunits help anchor Galpha subunits to the plasma membrane, promote interaction of Galpha with receptors, stabilize the binding of GDP to Galpha to suppress spurious activation, and provide membrane contact points for G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Gbetagamma subunits have also been shown to inhibit the activities of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), both phospholipase C (PLC)-betas and RGS proteins, when assayed in solution under single turnover conditions. We show here that Gbetagamma subunits inhibit G protein GAP activity during receptor-stimulated, steady-state GTPase turnover. GDP/GTP exchange catalyzed by receptor requires Gbetagamma in amounts approximately equimolar to Galpha, but GAP inhibition was observed with superstoichiometric Gbetagamma. The potency of inhibition varied with the GAP and the Galpha subunit, but half-maximal inhibition of the GAP activity of PLC-beta1 was observed with 5-10 nM Gbetagamma, which is at or below the concentrations of Gbetagamma needed for regulation of physiologically relevant effector proteins. The kinetics of GAP inhibition of both receptor-stimulated GTPase activity and single turnover, solution-based GAP assays suggested a competitive mechanism in which Gbetagamma competes with GAPs for binding to the activated, GTP-bound Galpha subunit. An N-terminal truncation mutant of PLC-beta1 that cannot be directly regulated by Gbetagamma remained sensitive to inhibition of its GAP activity, suggesting that the Gbetagamma binding site relevant for GAP inhibition is on the Galpha subunit rather than on the GAP. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer between cyan or yellow fluorescent protein-labeled G protein subunits and Alexa532-labeled RGS4, we found that Gbetagamma directly competes with RGS4 for high-affinity binding to Galpha(i)-GDP-AlF4.     

The function of interdomain interactions in controlling nucleotide exchange rates in transducin

The intramolecular contacts in heterotrimeric G proteins that determine the rates of basal and receptor-stimulated nucleotide exchange are not fully understood. The alpha subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins consists of two domains: a Ras-like domain with structural homology to the monomeric G protein Ras and a helical domain comprised of six alpha-helices. The bound nucleotide lies in a deep cleft between the two domains. Exchange of the bound nucleotide may involve opening of this cleft. Thus interactions between the domains may affect the rate of nucleotide exchange in G proteins. We have tested this hypothesis in the alpha subunit of the rod cell G protein transducin (Galpha(t)). Site-directed mutations were prepared in a series of residues located at the interdomain interface. The proteins were expressed in vitro in a reticulocyte lysate system. The rates of basal and rhodopsin-catalyzed nucleotide exchange were determined using a trypsin digestion assay specifically adapted for kinetic measurements. Charge-altering substitutions of two residues at the interdomain interface, Lys(273) and Lys(276), increased basal nucleotide exchange rates modestly (5-10-fold). However, we found no evidence that interactions spanning the two domains in Galpha(t) significantly affected either basal or rhodopsin-catalyzed nucleotide exchange rates. These results suggest that opening of the interdomain cleft is not an energetic barrier to nucleotide exchange in Galpha(t). Experiments with Galpha(i1) suggest by comparison that the organization and function of the interdomain region differ among various G protein subtypes.     

Differential sensitivity of P-Rex1 to isoforms of G protein betagamma dimers

P-Rex1 is a specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rac, which is present in high abundance in brain and hematopoietic cells. P-Rex1 is dually regulated by phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate and the Gbetagamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. We examined which of the multiple G protein alpha and betagamma subunits activate P-Rex1-mediated Rac guanine nucleotide exchange using pure, recombinant proteins reconstituted into synthetic lipid vesicles. AlF(-)(4) activated G(s),G(i),G(q),G(12), or G(13) alpha subunits were unable to activate P-Rex1. Gbetagamma dimers containing Gbeta(1-4) complexed with gamma(2) stimulated P-Rex1 activity with EC(50) values ranging from 10 to 20 nm. Gbeta(5)gamma(2) was not able to stimulate P-Rex1 GEF activity. Dimers containing the beta(1) subunit complexed with a panel of different Ggamma subunits varied in their ability to stimulate P-Rex1. The beta(1)gamma(3), beta(1)gamma(7), beta(1)gamma(10), and beta(1)gamma(13HA) dimers all activated P-Rex1 with EC(50) values ranging from 20 to 38 nm. Dimers composed of beta(1)gamma(12) had lower EC(50) values (approximately 112 nm). The farnesylated gamma(11) subunit is highly expressed in hematopoietic cells; surprisingly, dimers containing this subunit (beta(1)gamma(11)) were also less effective at activating P-Rex1. These findings suggest that the composition of the Gbetagamma dimer released by receptor activation may differentially activate P-Rex1.     

Regulation of Gi and Go by mastoparan, related amphiphilic peptides, and hydrophobic amines. Mechanism and structural determinants of activity

Mastoparan (MP), a cationic, amphiphilic tetradecapeptide, stimulates guanine nucleotide exchange by GTP-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins) in a manner similar to that of G protein-coupled receptors. 1) MP stimulated exchange by isolated G protein alpha subunits and alpha beta gamma trimers. Relative stimulation was greater with alpha beta gamma trimers and beta gamma subunits could increase net MP-stimulated activity. 2) MP action was enhanced by reconstitution of trimeric G protein into phospholipid vesicles. Hill coefficients for activation were 2-4. The membrane-bound alpha-helical conformation of MP appeared to be the activating species. 3) MP blocked the ability of Go to increase the affinity of muscarinic receptors for agonist ligands, suggesting that MP and the receptor may compete for a common binding site on Go. 4) MP stimulated steady state GTPase activity at less than 1 microM Mg2+ and stimulated the dissociation of both GDP and guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) at less than 1 nM Mg2+. Millimolar Mg2+ blocked the stimulatory effect of MP. Both high and low affinity Mg2+ binding sites are on the alpha subunit. 5) Increasing the amphiphilicity or hydrophobicity of MP enhanced its regulatory activity more than 2-fold and lowered the EC50 more than 10-fold. Several natural amphiphilic peptides also displayed modest stimulatory activity. 6) Benzalkonium chloride competitively antagonized the stimulation of Gi by MP but potently stimulated nucleotide exchange on Go. Because cationic, amphiphilic sequences on the cytoplasmic faces of receptors are required for G protein regulation, these findings suggest that nucleotide exchange on G proteins is regulated by the presentation of multiple cationic structures on the inner face of the plasma membrane.     

Effective information transfer from the alpha 1b-adrenoceptor to Galpha 11 requires both beta/gamma interactions and an aromatic group four amino acids from the C terminus of the G protein

Co-expression of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) in cells derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) knock-out mouse allows agonist-mediated elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels that is transduced by beta/gamma released from the G protein alpha subunit. Mutation of Tyr(356) of Galpha(11) to Phe, within a receptor contact domain, had little effect on function but this was reduced greatly by alteration to Ser and virtually eliminated by conversion to Asp. This pattern was replicated following incorporation of each form of Galpha(11) into fusion proteins with the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor. Following a [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) binding assay, immunoprecipitation of the wild type alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(11) fusion protein indicated that the agonist phenylephrine stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange on Galpha(11) more than 30-fold. Information transfer by agonist was controlled in residue 356 Galpha(11) mutants with rank order Tyr > Phe > Trp > Ile > Ala = Gln = Arg > Ser > Asp, although these alterations did not alter the binding affinity of either phenylephrine or an antagonist ligand. Mutation of a beta/gamma contact interface in the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Tyr(356) Galpha(11) fusion protein did not alter ligand binding affinity but did reduce greatly beta/gamma binding and phenylephrine stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. It also prevented agonist elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels, as did a mutation in Galpha(11) that prevents G protein subunit dissociation. These results indicate that a bulky aromatic group is required four amino acids from the C terminus of Galpha(11) to maximize information transfer from an agonist-occupied receptor and disprove the hypothesis that tyrosine phosphorylation of this residue is required for G protein activation (Umemori, H., Inoue, T., Kume, S., Sekiyama, N., Nagao, M., Itoh, H., Nakanishi, S., Mikoshiba, K., and Yamamoto, T. (1997) Science 276, 1878-1881). This is distinct from Galpha(i1), where hydrophobicity of the amino acid is the key determinant at this location. They also further demonstrate a key role for the beta/gamma complex in enhancing receptor to G protein alpha subunit information transfer.     

Genetic and structural analysis of G protein alpha subunit regulatory domains.

Genetic and structural analysis of the alpha chain polypeptides of heterotrimeric G proteins defines functional domains for GTP/GDP binding, GTPase activity, effector activation, receptor contact and beta gamma subunit complex regulation. The conservation in sequence comprising the GDP/GTP binding and GTPase domains among G protein alpha subunits readily allows common mutations to be made for the design of mutant polypeptides that function as constitutive active or dominant negative alpha chains when expressed in different cell types. Organization of the effector activation, receptor and beta gamma contact domains is similar in the primary sequence of the different alpha subunit polypeptides relative to the GTP/GDP binding domain sequences. Mutation within common motifs of the different G protein alpha chain polypeptides have similar functional consequences. Thus, what has been learned with the Gs and Gi proteins and the regulation of adenylyl cyclase can be directly applied to the analysis of newly identified G proteins and their coupling to receptors and regulation of putative effector enzymes.     

A G protein gamma subunit-specific peptide inhibits muscarinic receptor signaling

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors modulate the function of a variety of effectors through heterotrimeric G proteins. A prenylated peptide specific to the G protein gamma5 subunit type inhibits G protein activation by the M2 muscarinic receptor in a reconstitution assay. Scrambling the amino acid sequence of the peptide significantly reduces the efficacy of the peptide. The peptide does not disrupt the G protein heterotrimer. In cultured sympathetic neurons, the gamma5 peptide inhibits modulation of Ca(2+) current by the M4 receptor. Peptide activity is specific, the scrambled peptide and peptides specific to two other members of the G protein gamma subunit family are significantly less effective. The gamma5 peptide has no effect on Ca(2+) current modulation by the alpha2-adrenergic and somatostatin receptors. In addition, the gamma5 peptide inhibits muscarinic receptor signaling in spinal cord slices with specificity. These results support a specific role for G protein gamma subunit types in signal transduction, most likely at the receptor-G protein interface.     

Probing the activation-promoted structural rearrangements in preassembled receptor-G protein complexes

Activation of heterotrimeric G proteins by their cognate seven transmembrane domain receptors is believed to involve conformational changes propagated from the receptor to the G proteins. However, the nature of these changes remains unknown. We monitored the conformational rearrangements at the interfaces between receptors and G proteins and between G protein subunits by measuring bioluminescence resonance energy transfer between probes inserted at multiple sites in receptor-G protein complexes. Using the data obtained for the alpha(2A)AR-G alpha(i1) beta1gamma2 complex and the available crystal structures of G alpha(i1) beta1gamma2, we propose a model wherein agonist binding induces conformational reorganization of a preexisting receptor-G protein complex, leading the G alpha-G betagamma interface to open but not dissociate. This conformational change may represent the movement required to allow nucleotide exit from the G alpha subunit, thus reflecting the initial activation event.     

Gbetagamma subunit combinations differentially modulate receptor and effector coupling in vivo

In vitro, little specificity is seen for modulation of effectors by different combinations of Gbetagamma subunits from heterotrimeric G proteins. Here, we demonstrate that the coupling of specific combinations of Gbetagamma subunits to different receptors leads to a differential ability to modulate effectors in vivo. We have shown that the beta(1)AR and beta(2)AR can activate homomultimers of the human inwardly rectifying potassium channel Kir 3.2 when coexpressed in Xenopus oocytes, and that this requires a functional mammalian Gs heterotrimer. Modulation was independent of cAMP production, suggesting a membrane-delimited mechanism. To analyze further the importance of different Gbetagamma combinations, we have tested the facilitation of Kir 3.2 activation by betaAR mediated by different Gbetagamma subunits. The subunits tested were Gbeta(1,5) and Ggamma(1,2,7,11). These experiments demonstrated significant variation between the ability of the Gbetagamma combinations to activate the channels after receptor stimulation. This was in marked contrast to the situation in vitro where little specificity for binding of a Kir 3.1 C-terminal GST fusion protein by different Gbetagamma combinations was detected. More importantly, neither receptor, although homologous both structurally and functionally, shared the same preference for Gbetagamma subunits. In the presence of beta(1)AR, Gbeta(5)gamma(1) and Gbeta(5)gamma(11) activated Kir 3.2 to the greatest extent, while for the beta(2)AR, Gbeta(1)gamma(7), Gbeta(1)gamma(11,) and Gbeta(5)gamma(2) produced the greatest responses. Interestingly, no preference was seen in the ability of different Gbetagamma subunits to facilitate receptor-stimulated GTPase activity of the Gsalpha. These results suggest that it is not the receptor/G protein alpha subunit interaction or the Gbetagamma/effector interaction that is altered by Gbetagamma, but rather that the ability of the receptor to interact productively with the Gbetagamma subunit directly and/or the G protein/effector complex is dependent on the specific G protein heterotrimer associated with the receptor.     

A family of G protein βγ subunits translocate reversibly from the plasma membrane to endomembranes on receptor activation

The present model of G protein activation by G protein-coupled receptors exclusively localizes their activation and function to the plasma membrane (PM). Observation of the spatiotemporal response of G protein subunits in a living cell to receptor activation showed that 6 of the 12 members of the G protein gamma subunit family translocate specifically from the PM to endomembranes. The gamma subunits translocate as betagamma complexes, whereas the alpha subunit is retained on the PM. Depending on the gamma subunit, translocation occurs predominantly to the Golgi complex or the endoplasmic reticulum. The rate of translocation also varies with the gamma subunit type. Different gamma subunits, thus, confer distinct spatiotemporal properties to translocation. A striking relationship exists between the amino acid sequences of various gamma subunits and their translocation properties. gamma subunits with similar translocation properties are more closely related to each other. Consistent with this relationship, introducing residues conserved in translocating subunits into a non-translocating subunit results in a gain of function. Inhibitors of vesicle-mediated trafficking and palmitoylation suggest that translocation is diffusion-mediated and controlled by acylation similar to the shuttling of G protein subunits (Chisari, M., Saini, D. K., Kalyanaraman, V., and Gautam, N. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 24092-24098). These results suggest that the continual testing of cytosolic surfaces of cell membranes by G protein subunits facilitates an activated cell surface receptor to direct potentially active G protein betagamma subunits to intracellular membranes.     

Rhodopsin/transducin interactions. II. Influence of the transducin-beta gamma subunit complex on the coupling of the transducin-alpha subunit to rhodopsin.

In these studies we have investigated the role of the beta gamma T subunit complex in promoting the rhodopsin-stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange reaction (i.e. the activation event) of the alpha T subunit. The results of these studies demonstrate that although the beta gamma T subunit complex increases the association of the alpha T subunit with lipid vesicles that lack the photoreceptor, the beta gamma T complex is not necessary for the binding of alpha T to lipid vesicles containing rhodopsin, provided sufficient amounts of rhodopsin are present. The rhodopsin-promoted GDP/guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTP gamma S) exchange reaction, within the rhodopsin-alpha T complex, then results in the dissociation of the alpha TGTP gamma S species from the rhodopsin-containing phospholipid vesicles. A second line of evidence for the occurrence of rhodopsin/alpha T interactions, in the absence of beta gamma T, comes from phosphorylation studies using the beta 1 isoform of protein kinase C. The phosphorylation of the alpha T subunit by protein kinase C is inhibited by beta gamma T, both in the absence and in the presence of rhodopsin, but is enhanced by rhodopsin in the absence of beta gamma T. These rhodopsin-alpha T complexes also appear to be capable of undergoing a rhodopsin-stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange event. When the guanine nucleotide exchange is allowed to occur prior to the addition of protein kinase C, the phosphorylation of the alpha T subunit is inhibited. Although beta gamma T is not absolutely required for the rhodopsin/alpha T interaction, it appears to increase the apparent affinity of the alpha T subunit for rhodopsin, both when rhodopsin was inserted into phosphatidylcholine vesicles and when soluble lipid-free preparations of rhodopsin were used. This results in a significant kinetic advantage for the rhodopsin-stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange event, such that the addition of beta gamma T causes a 10-fold promotion of the rhodopsin-stimulation [35S]GTP gamma S binding to alpha T after 1 min but provides less than a 20% promotion of the rhodopsin-stimulated binding after 1 h. The ability of beta gamma T to increase the association of alpha T with the lipid vesicle surface does not appear to contribute significantly to the ability of rhodopsin to couple functionally to alpha T subunits, and there appears to be no requirement for beta gamma T in the alpha T activation event, once the rhodopsin-alpha T complex has formed.     

Prostaglandin receptors: advances in the study of EP3 receptor signaling

Prostaglandin (PG) E(2) produces a broad range of physiological and pharmacological actions in diverse tissues through specific receptors on plasma membranes for maintenance of local homeostasis in the body. PGE receptors are divided into four subtypes, EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4, which have been identified and cloned. These EP receptors are members of the G-protein coupled receptor family. Among these subtypes, the EP3 receptor is unique in its ability to couple to multiple G proteins. EP3 receptor signals are primarily involved in inhibition of adenylyl cyclase via G(i) activation, and in Ca(2+)-mobilization through G(beta)(gamma) from G(i). Along with G(i) activation, the EP3 receptor can stimulate cAMP production via G(s) activation. Recent evidence indicates that the EP3 receptor can augment G(s)-coupled receptor-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity, and can also be coupled to the G(13) protein, resulting in activation of the small G protein Rho followed by morphological changes in neuronal cells. This article focuses on recent studies on the novel pathways of EP3 receptor signaling.