Parameter Estimation for the Compartmental Model

An estimation procedure is obtained for a stochastic compartmental model. Compartmental analysis assumes that a system may be divided into homogeneous components, or compartments. The main theory for the compartmental system was studied by Matis and Hartley (1971) with a discrete population in a steady state. All the transitions among the particles are considered to be stochastic in nature. An estimation procedure, Regular Best Asymptotic Normal (RBAN), discussed by Chiang (1956) is investigated for a stochastic m-compartmental system. The detailed proof of the procedure is provided here. Asymptotic properties for the estimator has been studied and computation has been carried out on our proposed nonlinear model. The downhill simplex search method, originally developed by Nelder and Mead (1965), and applied to minimize our quadratic form is inherently nonlinear in nature, thus avoiding the need to evaluate any derivative for point estimation of the parameters. The procedure applied to an experimental situation involving two compartments gives very encouraging results.     

Least Squares and Minimum MSE Estimators of Variance Components in Mixed Linear Models

The paper deals with the quadratic invariant estimators of the linear functions of variance components in mixed linear model. The estimator with locally minimal mean square error with respect to a parameter ? is derived. Under the condition of normality of the vector Y the theoretical values of MSE of several types of estimators are compared in two different mixed models; under a different types of distributions a simulation study is carried out for the behaviour of derived estimators.     

Weighted Multivariate Regression Estimates Solved by Random Effects Approach

The paper deals with the random effects model, where the expectation vector and the covariance matrix of the effect influencing the population are to be estimated. The iterated estimator of expectation vector is derived, based on the invariant estimator of the combined covariance matrix, and some of its statistical properties are shown.     

On the mean square error associated with adaptive generalized ridge regression

Some numerical results are presented for generalized ridge regression where the additive constants are based on the data. The adaptive estimator so obtained is compared with the least-squares estimator on the basis of mean square error (MSE). It is shown that the MSE of each component of the vector of ridge estimators may be as low as 47.1% of the variance of the corresponding component of the least squares vector or as high as 125.2%.     

Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the negative binomial dispersion parameter

We derive a first-order bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator for the negative binomial dispersion parameter. This estimator is compared, in terms of bias and efficiency, with the maximum likelihood estimator investigated by Piegorsch (1990, Biometrics46, 863-867), the moment and the maximum extended quasi-likelihood estimators investigated by Clark and Perry (1989, Biometrics45, 309-316), and a double-extended quasi-likelihood estimator. The bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator has superior bias and efficiency properties in most instances. For ease of comparison we give results for the two-parameter negative binomial model. However, an example involving negative binomial regression is given.     

关于广义Potthoff—Roy估计

本文考察了生长曲线模型的定义形式,并因此建立了相应的广义Potthoff-Roy估计,在最小范数准则下,给出了估计的最佳选择并且讨论了协变量以及改进估计的方法,尤其当设计阵病态时,给出了两类新的岭型Potthoff-Roy估计。     

Unbiasedness of the Estimator of the Function of Expected Value in the Mixed Linear Model

The traditional method for estimating the linear function of fixed parameters in mixed linear model is a two-stage procedure. In the first stage of this procedure the variance components estimators are calculated and next in the second stage these estimators are taken as true values of variance components to estimating the linear function of fixed parameters according to generalized least squares method. In this paper the general mixed linear model is considered in which a matrix related to fixed parameters and or/a dispersion matrix of observation vector may be deficient in rank. It is shown that the estimators of a set of functions of fixed parameters obtained in second stage are unbiased if only the observation vector is symmetrically distributed about its expected value and the estimators of variance components from first stage are translation-invariant and are even functions of the observation vector.     

On Combination of Ratio and PPS Estimators

AGARWAL and KUMAR (1980) proposed an estimator, combining ratio and pps estimators of population mean and proved that the proposed estimator would always be better (in minimum mean square error sense) than the pps estimator or the ratio estimator under pps sampling scheme for optimum value of constant k (parameter). The optimum value of k is rarely known in practice, hence the alternative is to replace k from the sample-values. In this paper, an estimator depending on estimated optimum value of k based on sample-values, under pps sampling scheme is proposed and studied.     

Sequential designs for ordinal phase I clinical trials

Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials which incorporate maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) as data accrue are inherently problematic because of limited data for estimation early on. We address this problem for small phase I clinical trials with ordinal responses. In particular, we explore the problem of the nonexistence of the MLE of the logistic parameters under a proportional odds model with one predictor. We incorporate the probability of an undetermined MLE as a restriction, as well as ethical considerations, into a proposed sequential optimal approach, which consists of a start‐up design, a follow‐on design and a sequential dose‐finding design. Comparisons with nonparametric sequential designs are also performed based on simulation studies with parameters drawn from a real data set.     

On the potential for illogic with logically defined outcomes

Logically defined outcomes are commonly used in medical diagnoses and epidemiological research. When missing values in the original outcomes exist, the method of handling the missingness can have unintended consequences, even if the original outcomes are missing completely at random. In this note, we consider 2 binary original outcomes, which are missing completely at random. For estimating the prevalence of a logically defined "or" outcome, we discuss the properties of 4 estimators: the complete-case estimator, the available-case estimator, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), and a moment-based estimator. With the exception of the available-case case estimator, all the estimators are consistent. The MLE exhibits superior performance and should be generally adopted.     

Some Early Developments in Ratio Estimation

John Graunt (1662) was the first to estimate the ratio y/x where y represents the total population and x the known total number of registered births in the same areas during the preceding year. About 1765 Messance (Stephan, 1948) and Moheau (1778) published very carefully prepared estimates for France based on enumeration of population in certain districts and on the count of births, deaths and marriages as reported for the whole country. The districts from which the ratio of inhabitants to birth was determined only constituted a sample. Laplace (1786) prepared similar estimates in 1802 based on a two-stage sampling plan. Recently Hansen and Hurwitz (1943) showed that the ratio estimate (y_i/n_i)X of Y is unbiased where all x_i's are known and the n^th cluster is selected with p.p.s. More recently Hájek (1949), Lahiri (1951), Midzuno (1952) and Sen (1952) developed independently the sampling of n clusters with p.p.s to the totals of the sizes of the sample clusters S(x_i). Des Raj (1954) and Sen (1952, 1953) gave unbiased estimate of the variance of the estimator which was generally non-negative for samples with smaller probabilities. Rao and Vijayan (1977) gave an unbiased estimator which is non-negative for samples with larger probabilities. Hájek (1949) provided an almost unbiased estimator of the variance of the estimator. The paper discusses situations where Hájek's estimator of variance should be preferred to the Rao-Vijayan estimator and vice versa.