Zinc finger protein 668 interacts with Tip60 to promote H2AX acetylation after DNA damage

Many tumor suppressors play an important role in the DNA damage pathway. Zinc finger protein 668 (ZNF668) has recently been identified as one of the potential tumor suppressors in breast cancer, but its function in DNA damage response is unknown. Herein, we report that ZNF668 is a regulator of DNA repair. ZNF668 knockdown impairs cell survival after DNA damage without affecting the ATM/ATR DNA-damage signaling cascade. However, recruitment of repair proteins to DNA lesions is decreased. In response to IR, ZNF668 knockdown reduces Tip60-H2AX interaction and impairs IR-induced histone H2AX hyperacetylation, thus impairing chromatin relaxation. Impaired chromatin relaxation causes decreased recruitment of repair proteins to DNA lesions, defective homologous recombination (HR) repair and impaired cell survival after IR. In addition, ZNF668 knockdown decreased RPA phosphorylation and its recruitment to DNA damage foci in response to UV. In both IR and UV damage responses, chromatin relaxation counteracted the impaired loading of repair proteins and DNA repair defects in ZNF668-deficient U2OS cells, indicating that impeded chromatin accessibility at sites of DNA breaks caused the DNA repair defects observed in the absence of ZNF668. Our findings suggest that ZNF668 is a key molecule that links chromatin relaxation with DNA damage response in DNA repair control.     

Close encounters of the RNF8th kind: when chromatin meets DNA repair

Cells counteract the adverse effects of chromosome breakage by activating the DNA damage response (DDR), which entails a coordinated series of events that regulate cell cycle progression and repair of DNA lesions. The packaging of genomic DNA into condensed, often inaccessible chromatin severely complicates efficient DNA damage repair in living cells. Recent studies implicate a large number of chromatin-modifying enzymes in the DDR, suggesting a stepwise model in which chromatin is continually reconfigured to accommodate the association and action of repair factors during the different stages of the DDR. Emerging evidence suggests that the histone ubiquitin ligases RNF8/RNF168 act in concert with ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling enzymes to orchestrate the signalling and repair of DNA lesions in specific chromatin topologies.     

Spatiotemporal regulation of posttranslational modifications in the DNA damage response

A timely and accurate cellular response to DNA damage requires tight regulation of the action of DNA damage response (DDR) proteins at lesions. A multitude of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of chromatin and chromatin‐associated proteins coordinates the recruitment of critical proteins that dictate the appropriate DNA repair pathway and enable the actual repair of lesions. Phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, SUMOylation, neddylation, poly(ADP‐ribosyl)ation, acetylation, and methylation are among the DNA damage‐induced PTMs that have taken center stage as important DDR regulators. Redundant and multivalent interactions of DDR proteins with PTMs may not only be a means to facilitate efficient relocalization, but also a feature that allows high temporal and spatial resolution of protein recruitment to, and extraction from, DNA damage sites. In this review, we will focus on the complex interplay between such PTMs, and discuss the importance of their interconnectivity in coding DNA lesions and maintaining the integrity of the genome.     

USP7/HAUSP stimulates repair of oxidative DNA lesions

USP7 is involved in the cellular stress response by regulating Mdm2 and p53 protein levels following severe DNA damage. In addition to this, USP7 may also play a role in chromatin remodelling by direct deubiquitylation of histones, as well as indirectly by regulating the cellular levels of E3 ubiquitin ligases involved in histone ubiquitylation. Here, we provide new evidence that USP7 modulated chromatin remodelling is important for base excision repair of oxidative lesions. We show that transient USP7 siRNA knockdown did not change the levels or activity of base excision repair enzymes, but significantly reduced chromatin DNA accessibility and consequently the rate of repair of oxidative lesions.     

Chromatin modulation and the DNA damage response

The ability to sense and respond appropriately to genetic lesions is vitally important to maintain the integrity of the genome. Emerging evidence indicates that various modulations to chromatin structure are centrally important to many aspects of the DNA damage response (DDR). Here, we discuss recently described roles for specific post-translational covalent modifications to histone proteins, as well as ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling, in DNA damage signalling and repair of DNA double strand breaks.     

Regulatory ubiquitylation in response to DNA double-strand breaks

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly cytolethal DNA lesions. In response to DSBs, cells initiate a complex response that minimizes their deleterious impact on cellular and organismal physiology. In this review, we discuss the discovery of a regulatory ubiquitylation system that modifies the chromatin that surrounds DNA lesions. This pathway is under the control of RNF8 and RNF168, two E3 ubiquitin ligases that cooperate with UBC13 to promote the relocalization of 53BP1 and BRCA1 to sites of DNA damage. RNF8 and RNF168 orchestrate the recruitment of DNA damage response proteins by catalyzing the ubiquitylation of H2A-type histones and the formation of K63-linked ubiquitin chains on damaged chromatin. Finally, we identify some unresolved issues raised by the discovery of this pathway and discuss the implications of DNA damage-induced ubiquitylation in human disease and development.     

Histone post-translational modifications and the response to DNA double-strand breaks

The packaging of DNA into chromatin creates a number of significant barriers to the detection of DNA lesions and their timely and accurate repair. Eukaryotic cells have evolved a number of enzymes that modulate chromatin structure and facilitate DNA repair. Recent research illustrates how nucleosome remodelling enzymes cooperate with both DNA-damage-inducible and constitutive histone modifications to promote many facets of the cellular response to DNA damage.     

Chromatin perturbations during the DNA damage response in higher eukaryotes

The DNA damage response is a widely used term that encompasses all signaling initiated at DNA lesions and damaged replication forks as it extends to orchestrate DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, cell death and senescence. ATM, an apical DNA damage signaling kinase, is virtually instantaneously activated following the introduction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex, which has a catalytic role in DNA repair, and the KAT5 (Tip60) acetyltransferase are required for maximal ATM kinase activation in cells exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation. The sensing of DNA lesions occurs within a highly complex and heterogeneous chromatin environment. Chromatin decondensation and histone eviction at DSBs may be permissive for KAT5 binding to H3K9me3 and H3K36me3, ATM kinase acetylation and activation. Furthermore, chromatin perturbation may be a prerequisite for most DNA repair. Nucleosome disassembly during DNA repair was first reported in the 1970s by Smerdon and colleagues when nucleosome rearrangement was noted during the process of nucleotide excision repair of UV-induced DNA damage in human cells. Recently, the multi-functional protein nucleolin was identified as the relevant histone chaperone required for partial nucleosome disruption at DBSs, the recruitment of repair enzymes and for DNA repair. Notably, ATM kinase is activated by chromatin perturbations induced by a variety of treatments that do not directly cause DSBs, including treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors. Central to the mechanisms that activate ATR, the second apical DNA damage signaling kinase, outside of a stalled and collapsed replication fork in S-phase, is chromatin decondensation and histone eviction associated with DNA end resection at DSBs. Thus, a stress that is common to both ATM and ATR kinase activation is chromatin perturbations, and we argue that chromatin perturbations are both sufficient and required for induction of the DNA damage response.     

Epigenetic regulation of genomic integrity

Inefficient and inaccurate repair of DNA damage is the principal cause of DNA mutations, chromosomal aberrations, and carcinogenesis. Numerous multiple-step DNA repair pathways exist whose deployment depends on the nature of the DNA lesion. Common to all eukaryotic DNA repair pathways is the need to unravel the compacted chromatin structure to facilitate access of the repair machinery to the DNA and restoration of the original chromatin state afterward. Accordingly, our cells utilize a plethora of coordinated mechanisms to locally open up the chromatin structure to reveal the underlying DNA sequence and to orchestrate the efficient and accurate repair of DNA lesions. Here we review changes to the chromatin structure that are intrinsic to the DNA damage response and the available mechanistic insight into how these chromatin changes facilitate distinct stages of the DNA damage repair pathways to maintain genomic stability.     

The chromatin remodeling factor BRG1 stimulates nucleotide excision repair by facilitating recruitment of XPC to sites of DNA damage

BRG1 is a catalytic subunit of the human SWI/SNF-like BAF chromatin remodeling complexes. Recent findings have shown that inactivation of BRG1 sensitizes mammalian cells to various DNA damaging agents, including ultraviolet (UV) and ionizing radiation. However, it is unclear whether BRG1 facilitates nucleotide excision repair (NER). Here we show that re-expression of BRG1 in cells lacking endogenous BRG1 expression stimulates nucleotide excision repair of UV induced DNA damage. Using a micropore UV radiation technique, we demonstrate that recruitment of the DNA damage recognition protein XPC to sites of UV lesions is significantly disrupted when BRG1 is depleted. Chromatin immunoprecipitation of the endogenous DDB2 protein, which is involved in recruiting XPC to UV-induced CPDs (cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers), shows that elevated levels of BRG1 are associated with DDB2 in chromatin in response to UV radiation. Additionally, we detected slow BRG1 accumulation at sites of UV lesions. Our findings suggest that the chromatin remodeling factor BRG1 is recruited to sites of UV lesions to facilitate NER in human chromatin.     

Fanconi anemia proteins are required to prevent accumulation of replication-associated DNA double-strand breaks

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a multigene cancer susceptibility disorder characterized by cellular hypersensitivity to DNA interstrand cross-linking agents such as mitomycin C (MMC). FA proteins are suspected to function at the interface between cell cycle checkpoints, DNA repair, and DNA replication. Using replicating extracts from Xenopus eggs, we developed cell-free assays for FA proteins (xFA). Recruitment of the xFA core complex and xFANCD2 to chromatin is strictly dependent on replication initiation, even in the presence of MMC indicating specific recruitment to DNA lesions encountered by the replication machinery. The increase in xFA chromatin binding following treatment with MMC is part of a caffeine-sensitive S-phase checkpoint that is controlled by xATR. Recruitment of xFANCD2, but not xFANCA, is dependent on the xATR-xATR-interacting protein (xATRIP) complex. Immunodepletion of either xFANCA or xFANCD2 from egg extracts results in accumulation of chromosomal DNA breaks during replicative synthesis. Our results suggest coordinated chromatin recruitment of xFA proteins in response to replication-associated DNA lesions and indicate that xFA proteins function to prevent the accumulation of DNA breaks that arise during unperturbed replication.     

Shaping chromatin for repair

To counteract the adverse effects of various DNA lesions, cells have evolved an array of diverse repair pathways to restore DNA structure and to coordinate repair with cell cycle regulation. Chromatin changes are an integral part of the DNA damage response, particularly with regard to the types of repair that involve assembly of large multiprotein complexes such as those involved in double strand break (DSB) repair and nucleotide excision repair (NER). A number of phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, ubiquitylation and chromatin remodeling events modulate chromatin structure at the lesion site. These changes demarcate chromatin neighboring the lesion, afford accessibility and binding surfaces to repair factors and provide on-the-spot means to coordinate repair and damage signaling. Thus, the hierarchical assembly of repair factors at a double strand break is mostly due to their regulated interactions with posttranslational modifications of histones. A large number of chromatin remodelers are required at different stages of DSB repair and NER. Remodelers physically interact with proteins involved in repair processes, suggesting that chromatin remodeling is a requisite for repair factors to access the damaged site. Together, recent findings define the roles of histone post-translational modifications and chromatin remodeling in the DNA damage response and underscore possible differences in the requirements for these events in relation to the chromatin context.     

Should I stay or should I go: VCP/p97-mediated chromatin extraction in the DNA damage response

The ordered assembly of DNA repair factors on chromatin has been studied in great detail, whereas we are only beginning to realize that selective extraction of proteins from chromatin plays a central role in the DNA damage response. Interestingly, the protein modifier ubiquitin not only regulates the well-documented recruitment of repair proteins, but also governs the temporally and spatially controlled extraction of proteins from DNA lesions. The facilitator of protein extraction is the ubiquitin-dependent ATPase valosin-containing protein (VCP)/p97 complex, which, through its segregase activity, directly extracts ubiquitylated proteins from chromatin. In this review, we summarize recent studies that uncovered this important role of VCP/p97 in the cellular response to genomic insults and discuss how ubiquitin regulates two intuitively counteracting activities at sites of DNA damage.     

The ubiquitin- and SUMO-dependent signaling response to DNA double-strand breaks

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) represent the most destructive type of chromosomal lesion and trigger rapid chromatin restructuring accompanied by accumulation of proteins in the vicinity of the DSB. Non-proteolytic ubiquitylation of chromatin surrounding DSBs, mediated by the RNF8/RNF168 ubiquitin ligase cascade, has emerged as a key mechanism for restoration of genome integrity by licensing the DSB-modified chromatin to concentrate genome caretaker proteins such as 53BP1 and BRCA1 near the lesions. In parallel, SUMOylation of upstream DSB regulators is also required for execution of this ubiquitin-dependent chromatin response, but its molecular basis is currently unclear. Here, we discuss recent insights into how ubiquitin- and SUMO-dependent signaling processes cooperate to orchestrate protein interactions with sites of DNA damage to facilitate DSB repair.     

Chromatin and DNA damage repair

In eukaryotic cells, inheritance of both exact DNA sequence and its arrangement into the chromatin is critical for maintaining stability of the genome. Various DNA lesions induced by endogenous and exogenous factors make this maintanance problematic. To understand completely how cells resolve this problem the knowledge on the nature of these lesions, their detection, and repair within the chromatin environment should be integrated. Understanding of these processes is complicated by multiple types of DNA lesions and repair pathways, as well as the intricate organization of the chromatin. Recent advances in all these directions help to get insight on the repair regulation of DNA within the chromatin at the molecular and cellular level.     

Light and dark in chromatin repair: repair of UV-induced DNA lesions by photolyase and nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) and DNA repair by photolyase in the presence of light (photoreactivation) are the major pathways to remove UV-induced DNA lesions from the genome, thereby preventing mutagenesis and cell death. Photoreactivation was found in many prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, but not in mammals, while NER seems to be universally distributed. Since packaging of eukaryotic DNA in nucleosomes and higher order chromatin structures affects DNA structure and accessibility, damage formation and repair are coupled intimately to structural and dynamic properties of chromatin. Here, I review recent progress in the study of repair of chromatin and transcribed genes. Photoreactivation and NER are discussed as examples of how an individual enzyme and a complex repair pathway, respectively, access DNA lesions in chromatin and how these two repair processes fulfil complementary roles in removal of UV lesions. These repair pathways provide insight into the structural and dynamic properties of chromatin and suggest how other DNA repair processes could work in chromatin.     

aniFOUND: analysing the associated proteome and genomic landscape of the repaired nascent non-replicative chromatin

Specific capture of chromatin fractions with distinct and well-defined features has emerged as both challenging and a key strategy towards a comprehensive understanding of genome biology. In this context, we developed aniFOUND (accelerated native isolation of factors on unscheduled nascent DNA), an antibody-free method, which can label, capture, map and characterise nascent chromatin fragments that are synthesized in response to specific cues outside S-phase. We used the ‘unscheduled’ DNA synthesis (UDS) that takes place during the repair of UV-induced DNA lesions and coupled the captured chromatin to high-throughput analytical technologies. By mass-spectrometry we identified several factors with no previously known role in UVC-DNA damage response (DDR) as well as known DDR proteins. We experimentally validated the repair-dependent recruitment of the chromatin remodeller RSF1 and the cohesin-loader NIPBL at sites of UVC-induced photolesions. Developing aniFOUND-seq, a protocol for mapping UDS activity with high resolution, allowed us to monitor the landscape of UVC repair-synthesis events genome wide. We further resolved repair efficacy of the rather unexplored repeated genome, in particular rDNA and telomeres. In summary, aniFOUND delineates the proteome composition and genomic landscape of chromatin loci with specific features by integrating state-of-the-art ‘omics’ technologies to promote a comprehensive view of their function.