大壁虎不同地理居群的遗传变异与分化

以线粒体细胞色素b(Cytb)基因作为分子标记,对中国广西12个地区,以及越南和老挝大壁虎(Gekko gecko)进行序列测定,获得Cytb基因424bp的序列片段,共有7个单倍型。以白脊壁虎和沙虎为外群,用邻接法和最大简约法构建了大壁虎不同地理种群的系统发育关系,其结果显示中国广西4个不同单倍型黑大壁虎之间的平均遗传距离为0.20%—1.20%,越南红大壁虎与老挝红大壁虎之间的平均遗传距离为0.50%,广西宁明红大壁虎与越南红大壁虎和老挝红大壁虎之间平均遗传距离分别为1.70%和2.20%。广西黑大壁虎种群与红大壁虎种群之间的平均遗传距离为8.60%—9.50%,达到了亚种或种分化的差异。     

DNA条形码技术在中缅树鼩隆安种群和昆明种群鉴定中的研究

目的:本研究利用线粒体细胞色素C氧化酶亚基I基因(CO1)的一段保守区域作为DNA条形码技术的研究序列,探讨DNA条形码技术对中缅树鼩隆安种群和昆明种群进行分类鉴定的可行性。方法:对22只广西隆安树鼩和21只昆明树鼩样本的CO1基因进行PCR扩增、测序,应用MEGA V5软件对序列进行比对及分析其遗传距离,采用NJ法构建系统发育树。结果:中缅树鼩种群中,隆安种群、昆明种群和海南亚种的种内遗传距离为0.00%-0.79%,种群间遗传距离为9.71%-13.59%,中缅树鼩与普通树鼩的种间遗传距离为20.43%-24.11%,存在条形码间隔。系统发育树显示:隆安种群、昆明种群及海南亚种分别聚为一小支,分支置信度高达100%。结论:本研究结果表明DNA条形码技术有助于树鼩种群和亚种的分类鉴定,经CO1基因的测序分析证实广西隆安树鼩和昆明树鼩分属不同的种群。     

基于16S rDNA与Cytb序列的疏广蜡蝉属三个近似种的分子鉴定

本文通过PCR扩增首次获得了疏广蜡蝉属Euricania Melichar,1898 3个近似种:透明疏广蜡蝉E.clara Kato,1932、长刺疏广蜡蝉E.longa Xu,LiangJiang,2006和短刺疏广蜡蝉E.brevicula Xu,LiangJiang,2006的16S r DNA序列和Cytb序列;使用MEGA 6.0软件,分析了其序列组成及变异,计算了遗传距离,以宽广蜡蝉属Pochazia AmyotServille,1843的圆纹宽广蜡蝉P.guttifera Walker,1851和眼斑宽广蜡蝉P.discreta Melichar,1898为外群,利用邻接法(NJ)和最大简约法(MP)构建了系统发育树。结果显示:透明疏广蜡蝉、长刺疏广蜡蝉和短刺疏广蜡蝉的16S r DNA序列长度分别为414 bp,404 bp,435 bp,而Cytb基因序列长度分别为492 bp,468 bp,472 bp,三者的序列比对、碱基组成成分存在差异;2属5种广翅蜡蝉16S r DNA基因的种间遗传距离为0.008-0.098,属间遗传距离为0.122-0.197,而Cytb基因的种间遗传距离为0.038-0.055,属间遗传距离为0.181-0.188,表明16S r DNA和Cytb基因序列可作为DNA条形码候选基因片段,用于广翅蜡蝉近似属、种的分子鉴定。系统发育树的拓扑结构显示,3个近似种的亲缘关系基本一致,各自聚为一支,且置信值均达96%以上。本文亦结合了透明疏广蜡蝉、长刺疏广蜡蝉和短刺疏广蜡蝉形态学特征的差异对其进行了讨论和分析。     

陕西秦岭非法贸易动物(兽类)基因条码构建及分子鉴定

现今秦岭珍稀野生动物非法贸易频繁发生,野生动物仅通过外表难以准确鉴定。通过构建陕西省秦岭地区羚牛、林麝、斑羚、鬣羚、金丝猴、黑熊、小麂、毛冠鹿、果子狸、豹猫、野猪、大熊猫、黄鼬、鼬獾、獾15种兽类线粒体DNA Cytb基因条码,对3例来自秦岭森林公安收缴的无法鉴定的动物肌肉样品进行分子物种鉴定。利用Neighbor-joining法和非加权配对算数平方法,构建分子系统发生树,对比三种待鉴定样品样本和15种动物的Cytb序列的遗传距离和序列相似性。经分析,待鉴定样品A1与斑羚聚为一枝,序列相似性为99.4%遗传距离为0.006;待鉴定样品A2与鬣羚聚为一枝,序列相似性为98.8%遗传距离为0.012;待鉴定样品A3与黑熊聚为一枝,序列相似性最高为100%遗传距离为0.000。从而鉴定出三种物种分别为斑羚、鬣羚和黑熊。基因条码为物种鉴定和野生动物保护提供便利条件。     

基于线粒体COⅡ基因的中国蝽科分子系统学研究(半翅目,异翅亚目)

扩增并测定了我国蝽科4亚科8属11种昆虫线粒体COⅡ基因585 bp的序列,对序列的碱基组成、转换颠换、遗传距离等进行分析,探讨了COⅡ基因在该科的分子进化机制.并基于COⅡ基因序列数据,分别采用邻接法(NI)、最大简约法(MP)和贝叶斯推论法(BI)建立蝽科分子系统发育关系.研究结果表明,蝽科昆虫COⅡ基因A T含量平均为71.7%,存在较强的A T含量偏向性,氨基酸的变异率为27.2%;亚科间的遗传距离介于0.168～0.242之间,大于亚科内属种间的遗传距离,蝽科与盾蝽科2外群之间遗传距离最大,两科之间存在明显的间断.分子系统发育树表明,短喙蝽亚科为蝽科中较为原始的类群,分化较早,益蝽亚科与舌盾蝽亚科关系较近,形成一对姐妹群,蝽科中捕食性种类--益蝽亚科是较为特化的类群,它是由植食性种类分化而来.蝽科4亚科间的分子系统发育关系为Phyllocephalinae (Pentatominae (Asopinae Podopinae).     

地衣的ITS序列系统发育分析和DNA条形码的初探

目的:构建出地衣植物核糖体rDNA(nrDNA)的ITS序列的系统发育树并探讨地衣植物的DNA条形码.方法:以黑龙江五大连池风景区的地衣植物为材料,采用特异性引物对地衣植物的ITS序列进行Pcr扩增,直接对其Pcr产物进行测序,利用MEGA4.0软件建立地衣植物的ITS序列的系统发育树.结果:根据系统发育分析得出一致性指数CI和维持性指数RI分别为0 5356和0.6602,相同属地衣的样本间即种内的遗传距离 和不同属的样本间即种间的遗传距离(K-2-P)平均值分别为0.030和0.600,种间距离大于种内距离.结论:根据地衣植物样本间的遗传距离(K-2-P)的分析,得出核糖体rDNA的ITS基因对地衣近缘属的分类鉴定上具有一定的参考价值,建议作为地衣分类鉴定的条形码的测试片段.     

DNA条形码技术在北京百花山地区夜蛾科物种鉴定中的应用

为了探讨DNA条形码技术在夜蛾物种鉴定中的可行性, 本研究利用条形码通用引物扩增了北京百花山地区43种夜蛾75个样本的线粒体细胞色素C氧化酶亚基I （mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, COI）基因序列, 以Kimura双参数模型进行种内种间遗传距离分析、 使用邻接法（neighbor-joining, NJ）和最大简约法（maximum parsimony, MP）分别构建系统发育树, 并利用分子序列差异阈值对样本进行分子可操作分类单元（molecular defined operational taxonomic units, MOTU）划分。结果表明： 所有夜蛾种类通过系统发育树可以成功区分; 种内平均遗传距离(0.03%)远远小于种间平均遗传距离(11.29%); 采用较为保守的1%的序列差异阈值将75个夜蛾样本分为42个MOTU, 正确率为95%, 除了MOTU04包含2个物种外, 剩余41个MOTU与形态种呈现一一对应的关系。结果显示, 基于COI基因的DNA条形码对于本研究中所涉及的夜蛾具有较好的区分, 可以作为一种有效的工具在夜蛾科昆虫物种鉴定中进行应用。     

贵州发现昆明钝头蛇

2020年8月在贵州省普安县（25°47′02″N,105°01′07″E,海拔1 636 m）采集到3号蛇类标本。它们在形态上与昆明钝头蛇（Pareas niger）相似。基于线粒体细胞色素b(Cytb)基因序列构建的系统发育树显示,此次采集的钝头蛇标本与昆明钝头蛇的1号地模标本序列聚为一支,它们之间的遗传距离为0.4%,远小于钝头蛇属物种之间的遗传距离（5.60%～23.90%）。综合形态比较和分子系统发育分析结果,确定此次采集到的钝头蛇标本为昆明钝头蛇,为贵州省爬行动物分布新记录种。     

基于线粒体COI、Cytb和COII基因的中国草地螟不同地理种群遗传分化分析

【目的】揭示中国草地螟Loxostege sticticalis不同地理种群的遗传分化程度。【方法】采用PCR技术扩增中国西北和华北地区草地螟11个地理种群的线粒体 COI, Cytb和COII基因序列,基于其序列变异及单倍型贝叶斯系统发育树和单倍型网络图分析,探讨不同地理种群间的遗传距离、分子系统发生关系及遗传分化程度。【结果】草地螟11个地理种群的线粒体 COI, Cytb和COII基因序列分别有24, 12和69个变异位点(分别占总序列的3.6%, 2.7%和8.8%),检测到的单倍型分别为22, 14和16个,单倍型多样度(Hd)分别为0.7600, 0.5842和0.7341,核苷酸平均差异度(K)分别为1.704, 0.752和3.997,不同单倍型间的遗传距离平均值分别为0.004, 0.005和0.013。总种群的Tajima’s D和Fu’s Fs值皆不显著,表明草地螟不同地理种群间的遗传分化不明显,群体大小稳定。根据各地理种群的单倍型建立的系统发育树和单倍型网络图表明,各单倍型散布在不同的地理种群中,无明显的地理分布格局。【结论】草地螟各地理种群的遗传距离与地理距离间不具有显著的相关性,其遗传分化不明显。     

基于线粒体COⅠ、Cytb和COⅡ基因的中国草地螟不同地理种群遗传分化分析

【目的】揭示中国草地螟Loxostege sticticalis不同地理种群的遗传分化程度。【方法】采用PCR技术扩增中国西北和华北地区草地螟11个地理种群的线粒体COⅠ,Cytb和COⅡ基因序列,基于其序列变异及单倍型贝叶斯系统发育树和单倍型网络图分析,探讨不同地理种群间的遗传距离、分子系统发生关系及遗传分化程度。【结果】草地螟11个地理种群的线粒体COⅠ,Cytb和COⅡ基因序列分别有24, 12和69个变异位点(分别占总序列的3.6%, 2.7%和8.8%),检测到的单倍型分别为22, 14和16个,单倍型多样度(Hd)分别为0.7600, 0.5842和0.7341,核苷酸平均差异度(K)分别为1.704, 0.752和3.997,不同单倍型间的遗传距离平均值分别为0.004, 0.005和0.013。总种群的Tajima’s D和Fu’s Fs值皆不显著,表明草地螟不同地理种群间的遗传分化不明显,群体大小稳定。根据各地理种群的单倍型建立的系统发育树和单倍型网络图表明,各单倍型散布在不同的地理种群中,无明显的地理分布格局。【结论】草地螟各地理种群的遗传距离与地理距离间不具有显著的相关性,其遗传分化不明显。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor