An Australian trial of ThinPrep: a new cytopreparatory technique

To evaluate the sensitivity and suitability of ThinPrep, a new slide preparation technique, 2026 paired cervical cytology slides were examined. After conventional Papanicolaou smears were prepared, the sampling instruments were rinsed in a fluid fixative. ThinPrep slides were then prepared in the laboratory from the surplus cells in the fixative. Compared with the Pap smears, ThinPrep slides were easier and quicker to screen, were inconclusive less often, and had similar rates for detecting abnormalities and infection. There were more unsatisfactory ThinPrep slides and more ThinPrep slides lacked endocervical cells. Both of these shortcomings were found to be linked to the choice of sampling implements. This study, in which a variety of sampling instruments was used, fails to confirm some of the previous claims made for the new technique.     

Accuracy of a slide profiler for endocervical cell detection in no-further-review conventional Pap smears

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of the Focal-Point slide profiler (TriPath Care Technologies, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in determing the absence of endocervical cells in conventional Pap smear slides. STUDY DESIGN: A consecutive series of conventional Pap smears, designated by FocalPoint as requiring no further review (NFR) and as lacking endocervical cells, was manually screened to determine the true presence or absence of endocervical cells. These results were compared to those obtained by FocalPoint. RESULTS: From January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2001, FocalPoint indicated that 797 NFR slides did not contain endocervical cells. In contrast, manual screening revealed that 504/797 (63.2%) did contain endocervical cells. CONCLUSION: The reliability of a negative FocalPoint determination for endocervical cells is limited. Manual screening of NFR slides designated by the instrument as lacking endocervical cells appears to be necessary.     

Performance of the AutoPap Primary Screening System in the detection of high-risk cases in cervicovaginal smears

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of the AutoPap Primary Screening System (APSS) (TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) for the detection of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 14,779 consecutive conventional Pap smears were processed by the APSS. All slides designated as "Review" by the device were manually screened according to the Bethesda System. The ranking scores obtained from the device were compared with the cytologic interpretations in all cases and with the final histologic diagnoses in the cases with cytologic severe abnormalities. RESULTS: The device classified 10,349 slides as Review (78%) and 2,912 (22%) as "No Further Review." In the 78% Review cases, the samples were ranked in descending order of potential abnormality, broken into quintiles. The correlation between the slide quintile ranks and the manual cytologic diagnosis indicated that 90% of abnormal smears were categorized by the device as in the first and second quintile rank, and the correlation between the rank report of the device and the histologic diagnosis showed that all cases of HSIL or invasive carcinoma were in the top two ranks. No significant abnormalities were observed in any of the smears categorized as No Further Review. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the effectiveness of APSS for the detection of Pap smears with severe abnormalities.     

Determination of liquid-based cervical cytology specimen adequacy using cellular light scatter and flow cytometry.

BACKGROUND: The majority of cervical cytology specimens are being collected in liquid-based preservatives (LBP). However, the assessment of specimen adequacy, as mandated by The Bethesda System (TBS), is still being performed at the time of slide review. We present a rapid, flow cytometric method for assessing specimen adequacy. METHODS: Three LBPs were compared for cell-surface antigen preservation. A three-color antibody panel was used to confirm the light scatter profile of specific cells in a liquid-based cervical cytology specimen. Using forward and orthogonal light scatter alone, we were able to assess the adequacy of liquid-based cytology specimens in all LBPs tested. RESULTS: The number of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), endocervical (columnar) cells, ectocervical (squamous) cells, and debris in 120 liquid-based cervical cytology samples was quantified in less than 10 min. Using cutoffs of > 20% PMNs, < 1.0% endocervical cells, < 1.0% ectocervical cells, and < 500 total cells per milliliter, light scatter correlated with microscopic determination of adequacy with a correlation coefficient of 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid method allows the quantitative determination of cervical cytology adequacy in liquid-based cytology preparations prior to the preparation of slides for morphologic assessment.     

Decrease in numbers of glandular cell groups in post-LLETZ liquid-based cytology preparations

Objective:  Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) has become standard of care in the management of cervical squamous neoplasia and with cone biopsy glandular intraepithelial neoplasia. Controversy remains about the long-term effects of this traumatic procedure. The aim of this study was to count and compare the number of endocervical glandular cell groups in pre- and post-LLETZ cervical preparations using liquid-based cytology to establish a cyto-morphological correlate of destruction of the transformation zone.
Methods:  The cytology/histology correlation audit records of the Cytopathology Department of St Luke's Hospital in 2003 and early 2004 were used to select patients with a cytological diagnosis of high grade dyskaryosis followed by LLETZ. Only those cases with post-LLETZ cytological follow-up were selected. Cases using conventional smears were excluded. One hundred and twenty slides (60 pairs of slides) in total were retrieved. The cases underwent review and all groups of >3 glandular cells in each slide were counted by AM while blinded as to whether smears were pre- or post-LLETZ. Medians were compared using a Mann–Whitney U -test.
Results:  The median number of groups of endocervical glandular cells of the pre-treatment group was 5.5 and of the post-treatment group was 2.0. There were significantly fewer endocervical glandular cell groups in the post-LLETZ population ( P  = 0.03).
Conclusions:  The number of endocervical glandular groups in cervical cytological preparations decreases significantly following LLETZ procedure. This suggests that cytological follow-up may not be as useful in glandular neoplasia cases. Few or absent glandular cell groups in post-LLETZ preparations may have implications for adequacy assessment.     

Does liquid-based technology really improve detection of cervical neoplasia? A prospective, randomized trial comparing the ThinPrep Pap Test with the conventional Pap Test, including follow-up of HSIL cases

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity, specificity and specimen adequacy of the ThinPrep Pap Test (TP) with the conventional Pap Test (CV) in a low-risk population with subsequent follow-up of HSIL cases. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled design was chosen to compare the TP with CV. Cytologic diagnosis and specimen adequacy were evaluated and compared with histology data in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cases. Fifteen gynecologists in private practice, all trained in colposcopy, participated in the trial. Cytologic diagnosis, specimen adequacy and follow-up of the cytologic HSIL cases were compared in the two groups. In total, 1,999 patients were included, 997 in the TP group and 1,002 in the CV group. Randomization assignments were designated on cytology case report forms, which were placed in sealed envelopes. Each envelope had a sequential randomization number on the outside to allow tracking and authentication of randomization assignments. RESULTS: Comparison of results between CVs and TPs revealed no statistically significant differences in all diagnostic categories, ranging from "within normal limits" to HSIL. Specimen adequacy, however, was superior with CVs (P < .001). The cytologic diagnosis of HSIL correlated with the histologic diagnosis in 91% of the TP group and 100% of the CV group. CONCLUSION: Because there was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity and specificity of the two techniques, improved detection of cervical abnormalities and better specimen adequacy might not be a consequence of utilizing liquid-based preparations but of a better sampling technique. Removing mucus and cellular debris from the cervical surface with a cellulose swab before sampling cells with a proper sampling device results in the same sensitivity and specimen adequacy and is much less expensive than the liquid-based technique.     

European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.

The current paper presents an annex in the second edition of the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. It provides guidance on how to make a satisfactory conventional Pap smear or a liquid-based cytology (LBC) sample. Practitioners taking samples for cytology should first explain to the woman the purpose, the procedure and how the result will be communicated. Three sampling methods are considered as acceptable for preparing conventional Pap smears: (i) the cervical broom; (ii) the combination of a spatula and an endocervical brush; and (iii) the extended tip spatula. Smear takers should take care to sample the entire circumference of the transformation zone, to quickly spread the cellular material over a glass slide, and to fix the preparation within a few seconds to avoid drying artefacts. According to local guidelines, one of these three methods may be preferred. Sampling with a cotton tip applicator is inappropriate. Similar procedures should be followed for sampling cells for LBC, but only plastic devices may be used. The collected cells should be quickly transferred into a vial with fixative liquid according to the instructions of the manufacturer of the LBC system. Subsequently, the slide or vial and the completed request form are sent to the laboratory for cytological interpretation.     

Higher diagnostic accuracy with the ThinPrep method in a simulated intraoperative environment

Objective:  To compare the accuracy of intraoperative fine needle aspiration cytology samples prepared by the ThinPrep method to conventional cytological methods. Specimen adequacy and turn around time (TAT) were also assessed.
Methods:  Fifty consecutive fresh tumours submitted for histological analysis were aspirated and each prepared as follows: (i) direct smear with H&E stain, (ii) direct smear with Pap stain, (iii) ThinPrep slide with H&E stain, and (iv) ThinPrep slide with Pap stain. The slides were randomly distributed to three cytopathologists for interpretation. The quality of the preparation, the diagnosis and the time needed for interpretation were recorded.
Results:  Accuracy was measured as the percentage of absolute agreement between the cytological and the histopathological diagnoses of the lesions. Histologically, there were 43 malignant and six benign lesions and one atypical lipoma. The TAT began when the slides/cytolyte specimens arrived at the lab and ended with the pathologist's diagnosis.
Conclusions:  In terms of accuracy and specimen adequacy, ThinPrep slides with Pap stain is the best procedure. This advantage however is offset by the longer testing time.     

Comparison of two preparation methods for endocervical evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of SurePath liquid-based preparation method for examination of endocervical brush specimens as a substitute for conventionally prepared cytology methods for evaluating the endocervical canal during colposcopic examination and biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: Paired SurePath liquid-based test slides and conventional smears were obtained using an endocervical brush in a split sample protocol before biopsy at the time of colposcopy. The level of agreement between cytologic results obtained was assessed. Accuracy and operating characteristics were evaluated compared to histologic follow-up. RESULTS: Agreement between cytology results for the methods was excellent. The overall kappa was 0.924 (p = 0.0000). There was exact agreement on interpretation between the methods in 283 of 299 cases (94.6%). Cytohistologic follow-up results correlation were: SurePath liquid-based Pap test results and conventional smear results agreed with histology results in 47.8% and 49.2% of cases, respectively. Allowing for a discrepancy within 1 level of severity of cytologic grade, agreements were 76.6% and 77.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the SurePath method is equivalent to conventional endocervical brush cytology preparation and performs well for detection of cervical intraepithelial lesions and cancer. SurePath is acceptable for endocervical evaluation as a substitute for endocervical curettage at colposcopic biopsy.     

Comparison of manual and automated methods of liquid-based cytology. A morphologic study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morphologic characteristics of gynecologic samples prepared by 3 different methods of liquid-based cytology. STUDY DESIGN: Cytologic samples from representative cases of each diagnostic category of squamous epithelial lesion, prepared by automated and manual liquid-based systems, were analyzed by 3 laboratories in the United States, Portugal and Brazil. The systems included: ThinPrep (automated, U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved; Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.), Autocyte PREP (South American system, manual; TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) and DNACITOLIQ (manual; Digene Brazil, S?o Paulo, Brazil). A panel of 16 morphologic parameters was evaluated: cellularity, clean background, uniform distribution, artifacts, cellular overlapping, architectural and cytoplasmic distortion, cytoplasmic vacuolization, cellular elongation, imprecise cytoplasmic borders, folded cytoplasmic borders, nuclear hyperchromasia, coarse chromatin, prominent nucleolus, irregular nuclear borders, atypical mitosis and inflammatory infiltrate. Negative, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cases were included. Cases without biopsies were confirmed by consensus. RESULTS: Cellularity was adequate in all samples. Clean background was observed in the vast majority of samples with all liquid-based systems. Uniform distribution was frequently found in ThinPrep and Autocyte PREP samples but not in DNACITOLIQ. Artifacts were not present in DNACITOLIQ samples, rare in ThinPrep and observed in 8 (34.7%) Autocyte PREP. Cellular overlapping was observed in all 3 system samples: 11 (31.42%) cases in ThinPrep, 16 (69.56%) in Autocyte PREP and 17 (68%) in DNACITOLIQ System. Architectural and cytoplasmic distortion were present in 3 cases of HSIL (13%) and cytoplasmic vacuolization in 2 cases of LSIL and 1 HSIL of Autocyte PREP. Cellular elongation was found in 13 (56.5%) Autocyte PREP and in 5 (20%) DNACITOLIQ samples. Inflammatory infiltrate was found in all 3 system samples but with more frequency in the Autocyte PREP (69.56%) and DNACITOLIQ System (72%). CONCLUSION: This study clearly indicated that in spite of the different methodologies, the 3 methods adequately preserved cellular structure for morphologic evaluation. The choice of method will depend on price, availability and procedures involved.     

Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a liquid-based Pap test, the ThinPrep Pap test (TP) (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.), by comparing concurrent TP and cervical biopsy results on 782 patients who were referred for colposcopy because of previously abnormal conventional Pap smears (CPs). STUDY DESIGN: The ability of TP diagnoses of atypical cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) to predict biopsy diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was analyzed using chi2 and McNemar tests. RESULTS: The rate of agreement between diagnoses of SIL by TP and CIN by biopsy was 74.7%. ASC-US accounted for 16.0% of TP diagnoses. ASC-US had biopsy diagnoses of CIN 1 in 60% and CIN 2/3 in 12.8% of cases. For TP diagnosis of low grade SIL, biopsy diagnoses of CIN 2/3 were found in 13.5% of cases. For TP diagnoses of ASC-US and higher, the proportions of TP and cervical biopsies in comparable diagnostic categories were statistically significant (p < 0.001), with TP having sensitivity of 89.4% and positive predictive value of 89.7% for the detection of CIN. The false positive rate for TP was 8.1%, but rescreening confirmed the presence of abnormal cells in 51 of 63 (81.0%) cases of ASC-US or higher having negative biopsies. TP had a false negative rate of 8.3% and negative predictive value of 61.3%. Rescreening showed that most (77.6%) of the false negative TP specimens failed to have abnormal cells on the slides. CONCLUSION: For patients having previously detected cervical abnormalities by CP, concurrent TP demonstrated the following: (1) that it has high diagnostic accuracy for SIL, (2) that ASC-US was diagnostically equivalent to LSIL, and (3) that false negative TP for SIL can be attributed primarily to sampling rather than cytotechnologists' screening errors.     

Cytological features of chronic follicular cervicitis in liquid-based specimens: a potential diagnostic pitfall

A review of negative split-sample cervical cytology cases revealed five cases reported as chronic follicular cervicitis. These cases showed characteristic morphological features in conventional smears with lymphoid cells, plasma cells and tingible body macrophages smeared across the slides. This contrasts with the presentation of ThinPrep samples (Cytic Corporation, Boxburgh, MA, USA), where cells were observed aggregated in clumps. The different presentation noted in liquid-based samples may require careful microscopic evaluation at high-power magnification.     

Significance of atypia in conventional Papanicolaou smears and liquid-based cytology: a follow-up study

The diagnosis of atypical squamous epithelial cells, borderline nuclear changes, is associated with some controversy, as it encompasses benign, reactive, as well as possible neoplastic conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the follow-up diagnoses of cytological atypia in conventional Papanicolaou smears (CP) and liquid-based samples by the ThinPrep Pap Test (TP). A total of 1607 CP smears from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2000 and 798 TP samples from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2002 diagnosed as atypia were included. The results show that the detection rate of atypia in cervical cytological samples was reduced by 41.3% (P < 0.001) in TP compared with CP. Cytological and histological follow-up data showed the presence of neoplastic lesions in 34.7% of patients screened by TP versus 22.3% of patients screened by CP, corresponding to a 55.6% increase in TP (P < 0.001). Follow-up diagnosis of mild dysplasia was seen more than twice as often in TP than in CP (12.8% versus 5.0%, P < 0.001). The prevalence of moderate and severe dysplasia was significantly increased with 26.7% in TP compared with CP (21.9% versus 17.2%, P < 0.01). In conclusion, the ThinPrep Pap Test yielded a significant decrease in atypia rates compared with the conventional Papanicolaou test. In subsequent follow-up the percentage of neoplastic lesions was significantly increased in the ThinPrep Pap Test samples.     

Acetic acid recovery of gynecologic liquid-based samples of apparent low squamous cellularity

OBJECTIVE: To characterize cervicovaginal cytology samples with < 5,000 squamous cells on the initial ThinPrep slide (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A) and to attempt sample recovery using acetic acid. STUDY DESIGN: Cervicovaginal cytology samples with <5,000 squamous cells on the original ThinPrep slide and residuum were reprocessed by adding 3 mL of 3:1 CytoLyt (Cytyc)/glacial acetic acid with production of a second slide. Both slides were reviewed for squamous cell quantitation and the presence of background material and abnormal cells. RESULTS: From a total of 1,833 cases, 147 (8.0%) were identified for reprocessing; 71 (48.3%) were grossly bloody and 58 (39.4%) grossly cloudy. Reprocessing resulted in a second slide with > 5,000 squamous cells in 116 (78.9%) cases and was most effective on cloudy samples (89.7% recovery) and bloody samples (71.8% recovery). Abnormal cells were identified in 13 (8.9%) reprocessed samples. In all but 2 cases the abnormal cells were present on the initial slide and demonstrated the same degree of abnormality as the reprocessed slide but were fewer in number. CONCLUSION: Acetic acid recovery increases squamous cell recovery when initially inadequate, reducing the number of unsatisfactory cases and in rare cases identifying a cytologically significant lesion not apparent on the original slide.     

P‐4TRANSFORMATION ZONE COMPONENT IN LIQUID BASED CERVICAL CYTOLOGY

Introduction: Quality assurance guidelines for the UK cervical screening programme recommend that more than 80% of cervical samples from women aged 20–50 years should contain adequate numbers of Transformation zone (TZ) cells i.e. 10 or more endocervical or squamous metaplastic cells. This study was conducted to assess the frequency of TZ component in Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) both for ThinPrep (TP) and SurePath (SP) LBC. Also to assess the degree to which this is recorded by individual screeners and to determine the percentage of samples with evidence of TZ component for the different smear takers. Method: All LBC cervical specimens received at a tertiary cytology centre in the year 2004 from women aged 20–50 years were included in the study. Evidence of TZ sampling was recorded as: TP = TZ present (10 or more TZ cells)TA = TZ absentTS = TZ scanty (less than 10 TZ cells)TN = atrophic smears, TZ cells not recognisable Results: The total number of LBC cervical cases was 7445. TP = 4300 (mostly primary care) and SP = 3145 (mostly colposcopy). Overall TZ sampling rate in LBC was 82%. TP = 77.17%; SP = 88.24%. When scanty TZ was included, the standard was met for both systems (TP = 93.7%; SP = 88.24%). Presence/absence of TZ component was recorded in 6370 cases (85.1%); range 0%–97.79%. 56.7% of smear takers achieved the minimum standard for TZ sampling. Discussion: The percentage of ThinPrep samples containing adequate TZ cells was 77.17% compared to SurePath, which was 88.24%. This may be due to different patient populations i.e. primary care versus colposcopy. Screeners recorded TZ sampling in approximately 85% of samples. 56.7% of smear takers met the standard for TZ sampling.     

Enhancing recovery of endocervical component on gynecologic cytology specimens processed by thin-layer technology

OBJECTIVE: To address the causes and report the corrective measures required for resolving the initial problem of high rates of cervical vaginal cytology specimens reported as having no endocervical component on SurePath (AutoCyte, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) liquid-based, thin-layer technology at an academic center cytology laboratory. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of 511 cases lacking endocervical/transformation zone component out of 9,221 SurePath thin-layer gynecologic specimens processed in a one-year period. The study encompassed a review of sample collection techniques by physicians and nurses, specimen processing, cytologic features of endocervical/squamous metaplastic cells processed by the SurePath method and statistical analysis of endocervical cell recovery rates after implementation of corrective measures. RESULTS: Absence of endocervical/transformation zone component varied from an initial 18% in the first month to an average of 5.3% after corrective actions were implemented. Current rates of SurePath thin-layer specimens having no endocervical component are lower than those for conventional smears. CONCLUSION: Since SurePath was only recently introduced to the market, there are no previously published data addressing how to optimize the recovery of endocervical component on liquid-based, thin-layer specimens processed by this methodology.     

Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories

OBJECTIVE: Cervical screening programmes in England and Wales were advised by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in 2003 to adopt liquid-based cytology (LBC) in place of conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology to facilitate laboratory efficiency. Pilot evaluations in England and Scotland monitored daily or weekly workloads of smear readers and concluded that LBC could increase hourly throughput rates. This study, instead, used timing surveys to determine screening rates. METHODS: Two National Health Service cytology laboratories in Manchester and Stockport were partially converted to the LBC ThinPrep process for a cervical screening trial. Three 1-week timing surveys were conducted over 7 months. The surveys covered all LBC-trained staff. The first survey in Manchester also covered staff undertaking conventional Pap screening. The smear readers used timers to record time taken for examining and reporting each slide. RESULTS: In Manchester, in the first survey, nearly 1 minute per slide was saved by the LBC method during primary microscopy. In both laboratories, the mean microscopy time for primary screening of LBC slides was reduced by almost 1 minute between the first and second surveys. There was no difference between the second and third surveys. Microscopy by cytopathologists was also 1 minute per slide quicker with LBC than conventional Pap. The LBC inadequate rates for both laboratories were <2.0%. Organizational factors impacted on the hourly LBC primary screening rates in the laboratories, the rate for Stockport being higher than the rates in the pilot evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: The timing surveys confirm that the LBC ThinPrep technology can improve laboratory efficiency. However, decision-makers should also consider the overall costs and benefits of introducing the technology in screening programmes, including the capital investment and workforce implications.     

P16INK4A as an adjunct test in liquid-based cytology

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of P16INK4A as an adjunct test in liquid-based cytology in cases with equivocal morphologic changes of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). STUDY DESIGN: P16INK4A immunoreactivity was investigated in residual ThinPrep material (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) from 30 cases with equivocal diagnoses of HSIL that had corresponding follow-up biopsies. Two control ThinPrep cases were included: 1 HSIL with biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 and a negative specimen with a corresponding biopsy of squamous metaplasia. The expression of P16INK4A in ThinPrep specimens and corresponding biopsies was scored as previously described. A ThinPrep case was scored positive if it contained > 10 abnormal cells with nuclear and cytoplasmic immunocytochemical staining. Corresponding biopsies were scored as having negative, sporadic, focal or diffuse staining. RESULTS: The P16INK4A antibody assay was positive in 19 of 30 ThinPrep cases (63.3%). Seventeen of the 19 (89.4%) biopsies corresponding to the positively stained ThinPreps also were positive, with a score of at least focal positivity in the dysplastic regions (2 CIN 1, 4 CIN 2, 11 CIN 3; 2 lesions lost in the tissue recut). The assay was negative in 11 ThinPreps (36.6%) and 10 biopsies (33.3%) with tissue confirmation of chronic cervicitis (5), squamous metaplasia (2), CIN 1 (3) and 1 lesion lost in the tissue recut. Seventeen of 18 (94.4%) ThinPreps confirmed as high grade lesions upon biopsy showed P16INK4A positivity. The control HSIL case with a CIN 3 biopsy was diffusely positive for P16INK4A, and the control negative case with biopsy diagnosis of squamous metaplasia was negative. Nondysplastic squamous and metaplastic epithelium in 7 biopsies and nondysplastic squamous or metaplastic cells in ThinPrep cases were negative. Sporadic staining of bacteria, inflammatory cells and endocervical cells was noted. CONCLUSION: ThinPrep cases in the equivocal cytologic category with the corresponding tissue biopsy assayed for P16INK4A expression showed that there was utility for this type of testing. A larger series comparing corresponding ThinPrep and tissue biopsies will be undertaken. The role of HPV infection in these cases will also be explored.     

Effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of detecting squamous lesions in liquid-based cervical cytology

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of both screening and diagnosis in a liquid-based cervical sample. STUDY DESIGN: SurePath samples (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with known diagnoses were selected, including 18 negative, 16 low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and 12 high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cases. Through a serial dilution technique, samples of varying cellularity were prepared. The 275 slides were assigned random numbers and were routinely screened by 1 of 2 senior cytotechnologists, blinded to the reference diagnosis. Specimens with a screening diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or higher were reviewed by two pathologists, resulting in a final consensus diagnosis. Using a grid counting system, cellularity was determined for each slide. RESULTS: There was a clear demarcation in sensitivity between specimens with a cellularity of < 5,000 or > or = 5,000 squamous cells. This applied to both the sensitivity for screening and to the final consensus diagnosis. For cases with a reference diagnosis of LSIL+, at a cytotechnologist screening level of ASCUS or greater, sensitivity increased from 72.8% (< 5,000 cells) to 98.1% (> or = 5,000 cells) and for a reference diagnosis of HSIL from 85.7% to 100%, respectively. Similarly, for the consensus diagnosis, sensitivity rose from 78.5% (< 5,000 cells) to 96.6% (> or = 5,000 cells) for LSIL+ and from 82.9% to 100%, respectively, for HSIL. These differences were statistically significant (P < .001). CONCLUSION: A minimum cellularity of 5,000 squamous cells is recommended for SurePath liquid-based cervical preparations.     

Endocervical glandular neoplasia and its mimics in ThinPrep Pap tests. A descriptive study.

OBJECTIVE: To document the cytologic features of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma as observed in ThinPrep slides and to compare these features with those that have been described for conventional smears. STUDY DESIGN: Six cases of endocervical AIS and three cases of invasive adenocarcinoma were evaluated with respect to 3 low-power and 14 high-power features. All cases were biopsy proven. Glandular "look-alikes" (tubal metaplasia, n = 3; florid repair, n = 3; sampling of lower uterine segment, n = 1) were also examined. RESULTS: All cases of AIS contained dark groups and sheets at screening power. At higher power, nuclear detail was extremely well visualized. All cases had crowding, continuous depth of focus, variability of nuclear size and shape within groups, irregular nuclear membranes, uniformly stippled chromatin and at least occasional single atypical cells. Only one case lacked nucleoli. Traditional features (strips, feathering, rosettes and mitoses) were observed about as frequently as in conventional smears. Invasive lesions had many of the same features, with relatively more inflammation and lysed blood. Nonneoplastic look-alikes could be distinguished from neoplasms using traditional criteria. CONCLUSION: In this small study, AIS and invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma maintained the features previously described for conventional smears. Improved visualization of nuclear detail may allow the application of additional criteria, such as irregular nuclear membranes and the more consistent presence of nucleoli, for distinguishing glandular neoplasms from their look-alikes.