Corepressor binding to progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors involves the activation function-1 domain and is inhibited by molybdate

Corepressors are known to interact via their receptor interaction domains (RIDs) with the ligand binding domain in the carboxyl terminal half of steroid/nuclear receptors. We now report that a portion of the activation function-1 domain of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and progesterone receptors (PRs), which is the major transactivation sequence, is necessary but not sufficient for corepressor [nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR) and silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT)] RID binding to GRs and PRs in both mammalian two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation assays. Importantly, these two receptor sequences are functionally interchangeable in the context of GR for transactivation, corepressor binding, and corepressor modulatory activity assays. This suggests that corepressors may act in part by physically blocking portions of receptor activation function-1 domains. However, differences exist in corepressor binding to GRs and PRs. The C-terminal domain of PRs has a higher affinity for corepressor than that of GRs. The ability of some segments of the coactivator TIF2 to competitively inhibit corepressor binding to receptors is different for GRs and PRs. With each receptor, the cell-free binding of corepressors to ligand-free receptor is prevented by sodium molybdate, which is a well-known inhibitor of receptor activation to the DNA-binding state. This suggests that receptor activation precedes binding to corepressors. Collectively, these results indicate that corepressor binding to GRs and PRs involve both N- and C-terminal sequences of activated receptors but differ in ways that may contribute to the unique biological responses of each receptor in intact cells.     

p53 represses androgen-induced transactivation of prostate-specific antigen by disrupting hAR amino- to carboxyl-terminal interaction

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is highly overexpressed in prostate cancer. One important regulator of PSA expression is the androgen receptor (AR), the nuclear receptor that mediates the biological actions of androgens. AR is able to up-regulate PSA expression by directly binding and activating the promoter of this gene. We provide evidence here that that this AR activity is repressed by the tumor suppressor protein p53. p53 appears to exert its inhibition of human AR (hAR) by disrupting its amino- to carboxyl-terminal (N-to-C) interaction, which is thought to be responsible for the homodimerization of this receptor. Consistent with this, p53 is also able to block hAR DNA binding in vitro. Our previous data have shown that c-Jun can mediate hAR transactivation, and this appears to result from a positive effect on hAR N-to-C interaction and DNA binding. Interestingly, c-Jun is able to relieve the negative effects of p53 on hAR transactivation, N-to-C interaction, and DNA binding, demonstrating antagonistic activities of these two proteins. Importantly, a p53 mutation found in metastatic prostate cancer severely disrupts the p53 negative activity on hAR, suggesting that the inability of p53 mutants to down-regulate hAR is, in part, responsible for the metastatic phenotype.     

c-Jun potentiates the functional interaction between the amino and carboxyl termini of the androgen receptor

The transactivation functions of the human androgen receptor (hAR) are regulated by several accessory factors that can be either positive or negative. One factor that has been previously shown to mediate hAR transactivation is the proto-oncoprotein c-Jun. The positive effect is a primary one, can be exerted by both endogenous and exogenous c-Jun, and requires multiple regions of c-Jun. However, the exact mechanism by which c-Jun exerts its enhancing function is unknown. In this study, we have used a mammalian two-hybrid system to ask if c-Jun influences the ligand-dependent amino- to carboxyl-terminal (N-to-C) interaction of hAR, which is thought to be responsible for the homodimerization of this receptor. Our results show that c-Jun enhances both hAR N-to-C terminal interaction and DNA binding in vitro. We have also tested a panel of c-Jun and c-Fos mutants for their activities on the N-to-C interaction, and the data demonstrate that the activities of these mutants parallel their activities on hAR transactivation. A mutation in the hAR activation function-2 (AF-2) abrogates N-to-C interaction, DNA binding, and transactivation, and these activities are not rescued by exogenous c-Jun. Interestingly, the p160 coactivator TIF2 can stimulate hAR N-to-C interaction, a finding consistent with the effect on hAR transactivation. These data strongly suggest that the hAR N-to-C interaction is the target of c-Jun action, and this activity requires a functional receptor AF-2.     

Interactions of nuclear receptor coactivator/corepressor proteins with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex.

MCF-7 human breast cancer cells express the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), and treatment with AhR agonists such as 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) inhibits estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated responses. This study investigates physical and functional interactions of the AhR complex with a prototypical coactivator (estrogen receptor associating protein 140, ERAP 140) and corepressor (silencing mediator for retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor, SMRT) for ER and other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. The AhR, AhR nuclear translocator (Arnt), and AhR/Arnt proteins were coimmunoprecipitated with 35S-ERAP 140 and 35S-SMRT and, in gel mobility shift assays, AhR/Arnt binding to 32P-dioxin response element (DRE) was enhanced by ERAP-140 and inhibited by SMRT; supershifted bands were not observed. In transactivation assays, coactivator and corepressor proteins enhanced or inhibited AhR-mediated gene expression; however, these responses varied with the amount of coactivator/corepressor expression. These results confirmed functional and physical interactions of AhR/Arnt with ERAP 140 and SMRT in breast cancer cells.     

The human androgen receptor: Structure/function relationship in normal and pathological situations

Discrete functions have been attributed to precise regions of the human androgen receptor (hAR) by expression of deletion mutants in COS and HeLa cells. A large C-terminal domain constitutes the hormone-binding region and a central basis, cysteine-rich domain is responsible for DNA binding. In addition, separate domains responsible for transactivation and nuclear translocation have been identified. In LNCaP cells (a prostate tumor cell line) the hAR is a heterogeneous protein which is synthesized as a single 110 kDa protein, but becomes rapidly phosphorylated to a 112 kDa protein. Metabolic labeling experiments using radioactive orthophosphate also indicated that the hAR is a phosphoprotein. Structural analysis of the AR gene in LNCaP cells and in 46, XY-individuals displaying androgen insensitivity (AIS) has revealed several different point mutations. In LNCaP cells the mutation affects both binding specificity and transactivation by different steroids. In a person with complete AIS a point mutation was identified in the splice donor site of intron 4, which prevents normal splicing and activates a cryptic splice donor site in exon 4. The consequence is a functionally inactive AR protein due to an in-frame deletion in the steroid-binding domain. In two unrelated individuals with complete AIS, two different single nucleotide alterations in codon 686 (Asp) were found. Both mutations resulted in functionally inactive ARs due to rapidly dissociating hormone-AR complexes. It is concluded that the hAR is a heterogeneous phosphoprotein in which functional errors have a dramatic impact on phenotype and fertility of 46, XY-individuals.     

Competitive cofactor recruitment by orphan receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha1: modulation by the F domain

For most ligand-dependent nuclear receptors, the status of endogenous ligand modulates the relative affinities for corepressor and coactivator complexes. It is less clear what parameters modulate the switch between corepressor and coactivator for the orphan receptors. Our previous work demonstrated that hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha1 (HNF4alpha1, NR2A1) interacts with the p160 coactivator GRIP1 and the cointegrators CBP and p300 in the absence of exogenously added ligand and that removal of the F domain enhances these interactions. Here, we utilized transient-transfection analysis to demonstrate repression of HNF4alpha1 activity by the corepressor silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid receptors (SMRT) in several cell lines and on several HNF4alpha-responsive promoter elements. Glutathione S-transferase pulldown assays confirmed a direct interaction between HNF4alpha1 and receptor interaction domain 2 of SMRT. Loss of the F domain resulted in marked reduction of the ability of SMRT to interact with HNF4alpha1 in vitro and repress HNF4alpha1 activity in vivo, although the isolated F domain itself failed to interact with SMRT. Surprisingly, loss of both the A/B and F domains restored full repression by SMRT, suggesting involvement of both domains in the SMRT interaction. Finally, we show that when coexpressed along with HNF4alpha1 and GRIP1, CBP, or p300, SMRT can titer out HNF4alpha1-mediated transactivation in a dose-dependent manner and that this competition derives from mutually exclusive binding. Collectively, these results suggest that HNF4alpha can functionally interact with both a coactivator and a corepressor without altering the status of any putative ligand and that the presence of the F domain may play a role in discriminating between the different coregulators.