Evaluation of a commercial automatic treatment planning system for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments

PurposeAutomated treatment planning is a new frontier in radiotherapy. The Auto-Planning module of the Pinnacle³ treatment planning system (TPS) was evaluated for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments.MethodsTen cases were included in the study. Six plans were generated for each case by four medical physics experts. The first two planned with Pinnacle TPS, both with manual module (MP) and Auto-Planning one (AP). The other two physicists generated two plans with Monaco TPS (VM). Treatment plan comparisons were then carried on the various dosimetric parameters of target and organs at risk, monitor units, number of segments, plan complexity metrics and human resource planning time. The user dependency of Auto-Planning was also tested and the plans were evaluated by a trained physician.ResultsStatistically significant differences (Anova test) were observed for spinal cord doses, plan average beam irregularity, number of segments, monitor units and human planning time. The Fisher-Hayter test applied to these parameters showed significant statistical differences between AP e MP for spinal cord doses and human planning time; between MP and VM for monitor units, number of segments and plan irregularity; for all those between AP and VM. The two plans created by different planners with AP were similar to each other.ConclusionsThe plans created with Auto-Planning were comparable to the manually generated plans. The time saved in planning enables the planner to commit more resources to more complex cases. The independence of the planner enables to standardize plan quality.     

Spot-scanned pancreatic stereotactic body proton therapy: A dosimetric feasibility and robustness study

PurposeWe explored the dosimetric potential of spot-scanned stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) for pancreatic cancer.MethodsWe compared SBPT to stereotactic body intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SB-IMRT) in 10 patients. We evaluated 3 variables in SBPT planning: (1) 4 and 6 mm spot size; (2) single vs. multi-field optimization (SFO vs. MFO); and (3) optimization target volume (OTV) expansion. Robustness analysis was performed with unidirectional isocenter shifts of ±3 mm in x, y, and z and ±3% stopping power uncertainties.ResultsSBPT plans had lower V_10Gy for the stomach and small and large bowels. Under static robustness, a 5 mm OTV and SFO-6 mm spot size represented the best compromise between target and normal structure. A 4-mm spot-size and 3 mm OTV resulted in significant target underdosing with deformable dose accumulation analysis.ConclusionsThis study provides a critical basis for clinical translation of spot size, optimization technique, and OTV expansion for pancreatic SBPT.     

Dosimetric and localization accuracy of Elekta high definition dynamic radiosurgery

Background and PurposeWith the increasingly prominent role of stereotactic radiosurgery in radiation therapy, there is a clinical need for robust, efficient, and accurate solutions for targeting multiple sites with one patient setup. The end-to-end accuracy of high definition dynamic radiosurgery with Elekta treatment planning and delivery systems was investigated in this study.Materials and MethodsA patient-derived CT scan was used to create a radiosurgery plan to seven targets in the brain. Monaco was used for treatment planning using 5 VMAT non-coplanar arcs. Prior to delivery, 3D-printed phantoms from RTsafe were ordered including a gel phantom for 3D dosimetry, phantom with 2D film insert, and an ion chamber phantom for point dose measurement. Delivery was performed using the Elekta VersaHD, XVI cone-beam CT, and HexaPOD six degree of freedom tabletop.ResultsAbsolute dose accuracy was verified within 2%. 3D global gamma analysis in the film measurement revealed 3%/2 mm passing rates >95%. Gel dosimetry 3D global gamma analysis (3%/2 mm) were above 90% for all targets with the exception of one. Results were indicative of typical end-to-end accuracies (<1 mm spatial uncertainty, 2% dose accuracy) within 4 cm of isocenter. Beyond 4 cm, 2 mm accuracy was found.ConclusionsHigh definition dynamic radiosurgery expands clinically acceptable stereotactic accuracy to a sphere around isocenter allowing for radiosurgery of several targets with one setup with a high degree of dosimetric precision. Gel dosimetry proved to be an essential tool for the validation of the 3D dose distributions in this technique.     

Combined PET/CT for IMRT treatment planning of NSCLC: Contrast-enhanced CT images for Monte Carlo dose calculation

PurposeCombined PET/CT imaging has been proposed as an integral part of radiotherapy treatment planning (TP). Contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) images are frequently acquired as part of the PET/CT examination to support target delineation. The aim of this dosimetric planning study was to investigate the error introduced by using a ceCT for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) TP with Monte Carlo dose calculation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Material and methodsNine patients with NSCLC prior to chemo-RT were included in this retrospective study. For each patient non-enhanced, low-dose CT (neCT), ceCT and [¹⁸F]-FDG-PET emission data were acquired within a single examination. Manual contouring and TP were performed on the ceCT. An additional set of independent target volumes was auto-segmented in PET images. Dose distributions were recalculated on the neCT. Differences in dosimetric parameters were evaluated.ResultsDose differences in PTV and lungs were small for all patients. The maximum difference in all PTVs when using ceCT images for dose calculation was ?2.1%, whereas the mean difference was less than ?1.7%. Maximum differences in the lungs ranged from ?1.8% to 2.1% (mean: ?0.1%). In four patients an underestimation of the maximum spinal cord dose between 2% and 3.2% was observed, but treatment plans remained clinically acceptable.ConclusionsMonte Carlo based IMRT planning for NSCLC patients using ceCT allows for correct dose calculation. A direct comparison to neCT-based treatment plans revealed only small dose differences. Therefore, ceCT-based TP is clinically safe as long as the maximum acceptable dose to organs at risk is not approached.     

Dosimetric effect of uncorrected rotations in lung SBRT with stereotactic imaging guidance

PurposeTo evaluate the dosimetric impact of uncorrected rotations on the planning target volume (PTV) coverage for early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy using Brainlab ExacTrac image guidance.MethodsTwenty-two patients were retrospectively selected. Two scenarios of uncorrected rotations were simulated with magnitude of 1°, 2°, 3° and 5°: (1) rotation around the treatment isocenter; and (2) roll and yaw rotations around a setup isocenter. The D₉₅ of PTV from recalculated dose on the rotated CT was compared to that from the clinical plan. A logistic regression model was used to predict the probability of dose differences between recalculated and original plans that are less than 2% based on the rotation angle, PTV volume, and distance between the treatment and setup isocenter.ResultsLogistic regression model showed the uncorrected isocentric rotations of up to 2.5° in all directions have negligible dosimetric impact. For non-isocentric rotations, a rotational error of 2° may cause significant under-dose of the PTV. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) parameters in the logistic regression model were angle for isocentric rotations, angle and distance for non-isocentric roll rotations, and angle, distance and the PTV volume for non-isocentric yaw rotations.ConclusionsThe severity of the dose deviations due to uncorrected rotations depends on the type and magnitude of the rotation, the volume of the PTV, and the distance between the treatment and setup isocenter, which should be taken into consideration when making clinical judgment of whether the rotational error could be ignored.     

Assessing the need for adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients using an automatic planning tool

BackgroundUnbiased analysis of the impact of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is necessary to evaluate dosimetric benefit and optimize clinics’ workflows. The aim of the study was to assess the need for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients using an automatic planning tool in a retrospective planning study.Materials and methodsThirty H&N patients treated with adaptive radiotherapy were analysed. Patients had a CT scan for treatment planning and a verification CT during treatment according to the clinic’s protocol. Considering these images, three plans were retrospectively generated using the iCycle tool to simulate the scenarios with and without adaptation: 1) the optimized plan based on the planning CT; 2) the optimized plan based on the verification CT (ART-plan); 3) the plan obtained by considering treatment plan 1 re-calculated in the verification CT (non-ART plan). The dosimetric endpoints for both target volumes and OAR were compared between scenarios 2 and 3 and the SPIDERplan used to evaluate plan quality.ResultsThe most significant impact of ART was found for the PTVs, which demonstrated decreased D98% in the non-ART plan. A general increase in the dose was observed for the OAR but only the spinal cord showed a statistical significance. The SPIDERplan analysis indicated an overall loss of plan quality in the absence of ART.ConclusionThese results confirm the advantages of ART in H&N patients, especially for the coverage of target volumes. The usage of an automatic planning tool reduces planner-induced bias in the results, guaranteeing that the observed changes derive from the application of ART.     

Dosimetric impact of contrast-enhanced 4d computed tomography for stereotactic body radiation therapy of hepatocelluar carcinoma

BackgroundA purpose of the study was to investigate the dosimetric impact of contrast media on dose calculation using average 4D contrast-enhanced computed tomography (4D-CECT) and delayed 4D-CT (d4D-CT) images caused by CT simulation contrast agents for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of liver cases.Materials and methodsFifteen patients of liver SBRT treated using the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique were selected retrospectively. 4D-CECT, and d4D-CT were acquired with the Anzai gating system and GE CT. For all patients, gross target volume (GTV) was contoured on the ten phases after rigid registration of both the contrast and delayed scans and merged to generate internal target volume (ITV) on average CT images. Region of interest (ROI) was drawn on contrast images and then copied to the delayed images after rigid registration of two average CT datasets. The treatment plans were generated for contrast enhanced average CT, delayed average CT and contrast enhanced average CT with electron density of the heart overridden.ResultsNo significant dosimetric difference was observed in plans parameters (mean HU value of the liver, total monitor units, total control points, degree of modulation and average segment area) except mean HU value of the aorta amongst the three arms. All the OARs were evaluated and resulted in statistically insignificant variation (p > 0.05) using one way ANOVA analysis.ConclusionsContrast enhanced 4D-CT is advantageous in accurate delineation of tumors and assessing accurate ITV. The treatment plans generated on average 4D-CECT and average d4D-CT have a clinically insignificant effect on dosimetric parameters.     

Characterization of robust optimization for VMAT plan for liver cancer

PurposeWe investigated the feasibility of robust optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver cancer in comparison with planning target volume (PTV)-based optimized plans. Treatment plan quality, robustness, complexity, and accuracy of dose delivery were assessed.MethodsTen liver cancer patients were selected for this study. PTV-based optimized plans with an 8-mm PTV margin and robust optimized plans with an 8-mm setup uncertainty were generated. Plan perturbed doses were evaluated using a setup error of 8 mm in all directions from the isocenter. The dosimetric comparison parameters were clinical target volume (CTV) doses (D_98%, D_50%, and D_2%), liver doses, and monitor unit (MU). Plan complexity was evaluated using the modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv).ResultsThere was no significant difference between the two optimizations with respect to CTV doses and MUs. Robust optimized plans had a higher liver dose than did PTV-based optimized plans. Plan perturbed dose evaluations showed that doses to the CTV for the robust optimized plans had small variations. Robust optimized plans were less complex than PTV-based optimized plans. Robust optimized plans had statistically significant fewer leaf position errors than did PTV-based optimized plans.ConclusionsComparison of treatment plan quality, robustness, and plan complexity of both optimizations showed that robust optimization could be feasibile for VMAT of liver cancer.     

Impact of shoulder deformation on volumetric modulated arc therapy doses for head and neck cancer

PurposeWhen using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck cancer, setup errors regarding the shoulders can create loss of target coverage or increased organ-at-risk doses. This study created variations of realistic shoulder deformations to understand the associated VMAT dosimetric effects and investigated water-equivalent thickness (WET) differences using in-house software.MethodsTen patients with head and neck cancer with lower neck involvement were retrospectively and randomly enrolled. Their retrospective analysis comprised treatment planning using RayStation 5.0 (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden), shoulder deformation of 5–15 mm in three-dimensional axes using the ImSimQA package (Oncology Systems Limited, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, UK), and evaluation of the clinical impact of the dose distribution after recalculating the dose distribution using computed tomography images of deformed shoulders and deforming the dose distribution. Additionally, our in-house software program was used to measure WET differences for shoulder deformation.ResultsWET differences were greater in the superoinferior (SI) direction than in the other directions (the WET difference was >20 mm for 15-mm SI deformation). D99%, D98%, and D95% for all clinical target volumes were within 3%. Local dose differences of more than ±10% were found for normal tissues at the level of the shoulder for 15-mm movement in the SI direction.ConclusionsShoulder deformation of >6 mm could cause large dose variations delivered to the targeted tissue at the level of the shoulder. Thus, to ensure delivery of appropriate treatment coverage to the targeted tissue, shoulder deformation should be taken into consideration during the planning stage.     

Personalized treatment planning in eye brachytherapy for ocular melanoma: Dosimetric analysis on ophthalmic structure at risk

PurposeTo evaluate the impact on dose distribution to eye organs-at-risk (eOARs) of a computed tomography (CT)-based treatment planning in eye plaque brachytherapy (EPB) treatment.MethodsWe analyzed 19 ocular melanoma patients treated with ruthenium-106 plaques to a total dose of 100 Gy to tumor apex using conventional central-axis-point dose calculation. Treatments were re-planned using the Plaque Simulator (PS) software implementing two different strategies: a personalized CT-eye-model (CT-PS) and a standard-eye-model (SEM-PS) defined by Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study. Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance evaluated the concordance between eye-bulb-models. Mean doses (D_mean) to tumor and eOARs were extracted from Dose-Volume-Histograms and Retinal-Dose-Area-Histogram. Differences between planning approaches were tested by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsIn the analyzed cohort, 8 patients (42%) had posterior tumor location, 8 (42%) anterior, and 3 (16%) equatorial. The SEM did not accurately described the real CT eye-bulb geometry (median Hausdorff distance 0.8 mm, range: (0.4–1.3) mm). Significant differences in fovea and macula D_mean values were found (p = 0.04) between CT-PS and SEM-PS schemes. No significant dosimetric differences were found for tumor and other eOARs. The planning scheme particularly affects the OARs closest to the tumor with a general tendency of SEM-PS to overestimate the doses to the OARs closest to the tumor.ConclusionThe dosimetric accuracy achievable with CT-PS EPB treatment planning may help to identify ocular melanoma patients who could benefit the most from a personalized eye dosimetry for an optimal outcome in terms of tumor coverage and eOARs sparing. Further research and larger studies are underway.     

On the use of AAA and AcurosXB algorithms for three different stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) techniques: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT)

AimThe purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric characteristics of three stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) techniques using the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB algorithm. The SABR techniques include coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (C-VMAT), non-coplanar intensity modulated radiation therapy (NC-IMRT) and non-coplanar three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (NC-3D CRT).BackgroundSABR is a special type of radiotherapy where a high dose of radiation is delivered over a short time. The treatment outcome and accuracy of the dose delivered to cancer patients highly depend on the dose calculation algorithm and treatment technique.Materials and methodsTwelve lung cancer patients underwent 4D CT scanning, and three different treatment plans were generated: C-VMAT, NC-IMRT, NC-3D CRT. Dose calculation was performed using the AAA and Acuros XB algorithm. The dosimetric indices, such as conformity index (CI), homogeneity index, dose fall-off index, doses received by organs at risk and planning target volume, were used to compare the plans. The accuracy of AAA and Acuros XB (AXB) algorithms for the lung was validated against measured dose on a CIRS thorax phantom.ResultsThe CIs for C-VMAT, NC-IMRT and NC-3D CRT were 1.21, 1.28 and 1.38 for the AAA, respectively, and 1.17, 1.26 and 1.36 for the Acuros XB algorithm, respectively. The overall dose computed by AcurosXB algorithm was close to the measured dose when compared to the AAA algorithm. The overall dose computed by the AcurosXB algorithm was close to the measured dose when compared to the AAA algorithm.ConclusionThis study showed that the treatment planning results obtained using the Acuros XB algorithm was better than those using the AAA algorithm in SABR lung radiotherapy.     

Determination of an inflection point for a dosimetric analysis of unflattened beam using the first principle of derivatives by python code programming

BackgroundPractice of Unflattened or Flattening filter free (FFF) beam has become the high dose standard in radiotherapy (RT), such as stereotactic radio-surgery (SRS) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). The removal of a flattening filter (FF) from the path of a photon beam alters the characteristics of FFF beam. Since the conventional route for dosimetric analysis of FF beam cannot be applied to FFF beam, the procedure of analyzing beam characteristics for FFF beam based on inflection points (IPs) is used. IP is a point where the concavity change observed corresponds to its change in sign (±) of the second derivative.AimThe objective of the study is to determine IPs for dosimetric analysis of the FFF beam profile.Methods and materialsIn this study, IPs are determined through the python code programming based on the mathematical first principle of the derivative. They are compared with IPs estimated by the conventional graphical manual method using Microsoft Excel (MS). IPs and their dependent dosimetric parameters determined by both mathematical and graphical manual methods are compared.ResultPercentage differences between the IPs determined by both methods, for 6MVFFF inline and crossline beam profile are found to be 2.7% and 0.8% respectively. Similarly, the average penumbra differences for 6MVFFF inline and crossline beam profile are found to be 0.15 mm and 0.9 mm, respectively. However, differences in the field width between both methods are found insignificant.ConclusionGraphical manual method is very time-consuming, tedious and user dependent. However, the mathematical method through python code programming is more precise, faster and independent of individual users.     

A practical methodology to improve the dosimetric accuracy of MR-based radiotherapy simulation for brain tumors

PurposeTo investigate the dosimetric accuracy of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images generated by a clinically-ready voxel-based MRI simulation package, and to develop a simple and feasible method to improve the accuracy.Methods20 patients with brain tumor were selected to undergo CT and MRI simulation. sCT images were generated by a clinical MRI simulation package. The discrepancy between planning CT and sCT in CT number and body contour were evaluated. To resolve the discrepancies, an sCT specific CT-relative electron density (RED) calibration curve was used, and a layer of pseudo-skin was created on the sCT. The dosimetric impact of these discrepancies, and the improvement brought about by the modifications, were evaluated by a planning study. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans for each patient were created and optimized on the planning CT, which were then transferred to the original sCT and the modified-sCT for dose re-calculation. Dosimetric comparisons and gamma analysis between the calculated doses in different images were performed.ResultsThe average gamma passing rate with 1%/1 mm criteria was only 70.8% for the comparison of dose distribution between planning CT and original sCT. The mean dose difference between the planning CT and the original sCT were −1.2% for PTV D₉₅ and −1.7% for PTV D_max, while the mean dose difference was within 0.7 Gy for all relevant OARs. After applying the modifications on the sCT, the average gamma passing rate was increased to 92.2%. Mean dose difference in PTV D₉₅ and D_max were reduced to −0.1% and −0.3% respectively. The mean dose difference was within 0.2 Gy for all OAR structures and no statistically significant difference were found.ConclusionsThe modified-sCT demonstrated improved dosimetric agreement with the planning CT. These results indicated the overall dosimetric accuracy and practicality of this improved MR-based treatment planning method.     

Dosimetric impact of different multileaf collimators on prostate intensity modulated treatment planning

AimThe main purpose of this study is to perform a dosimetric comparison on target volumes and organs at risks (OARs) between prostate intensity modulated treatment plans (IMRT) optimized with different multileaf collimators (MLCs).BackgroundThe use of MLCs with a small leaf width in the IMRT optimization may improve conformity around the tumor target whilst reducing the dose to normal tissues.Materials and methodsTwo linacs mounting MLCs with 5 and 10 mm leaf-width, respectively, implemented in Pinnacle³ treatment planning system were used for this work. Nineteen patients with prostate carcinoma undergoing a radiotherapy treatment were enrolled. Treatment planning with different setup arrangements (7 and 5 beams) were performed for each patient and each machine. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) cut-off points were used in the treatment planning comparison.ResultsComparable planning target volume (PTV) coverage was obtained with 7- and 5-beam configuration (both with 5 and 10 mm MLC leaf-width). The comparison of bladder and rectum DVH cut-off points for the 5-beam arrangement shows that 52.6% of the plans optimized with a larger leaf-width did not satisfy at least one of the OARs’ constraints. This percentage is reduced to 10.5% for the smaller leaf-width. If a 7-beam arrangement is used the value of 52.6% decreases to 21.1% while the value of 10.5% remains unchanged.ConclusionMLCs collimators with different widths and number of leaves lead to a comparable prostate treatment planning if a proper adjustment is made of the number of gantry angles.     

Dosimetric comparison of dynamic conformal arc integrated with segment shape optimization and variable dose rate versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for liver SBRT

AimThe aim is a dosimetric comparison of dynamic conformal arc integrated with the segment shape optimization and variable dose rate (DCA_SSO_VDR) versus VMAT for liver SBRT and interaction of various treatment plan quality indices with PTV and degree of modulation (DoM) for both techniques.BackgroundThe DCA is the state-of-the-art technique but overall inferior to VMAT, and the DCA_SSO_VDR technique was not studied for liver SBRT.Materials and methodsTwenty-five patients of liver SBRT treated using the VMAT technique were selected. DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans were also generated for all patients in Monaco TPS using the same objective constraint template and treatment planning parameters as used for the VMAT technique. For comparison purpose, organs at risk (OARs) doses and treatment plans quality indices, such as maximum dose of PTV (D_max%), mean dose of PTV (D_mean%), maximum dose at 2 cm in any direction from the PTV (D_2cm%), total monitor units (MU’s), gradient index R_50%, degree of modulation (DoM), conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and healthy tissue mean dose (HTMD) were compared.ResultsSignificant dosimetric differences were observed in several OARs doses and lowered in VMAT plans. The D_2cm%, R_50%, CI, HI and HTMD are dosimetrically inferior in DCA_SSO_VDR plans. The higher DoM results in poor dose gradient and better dose gradient for DCA_SSO_VDR and VMAT treatment plans, respectively.ConclusionsFor liver SBRT, DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans are neither dosimetrically superior nor better alternative to the VMAT delivery technique. A reduction of 69.75% MU was observed in DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans. For the large size of PTV and high DoM, DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans result in poorer quality.     

Dosimetric accuracy of dual isocenter irradiation in low magnetic field resonance guided radiotherapy system for extended abdominal tumours

PurposeDue to limited field size of Magnetic Resonance Linear Accelerators (MR-Linac), some treatments could require a dual-isocenter planning approach to achieve a complete target coverage and thus exploit the benefits of the online adaptation. This study evaluates the dosimetric accuracy of the dual-isocenter intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery technique for MR-Linac.Material and MethodsDual-isocenter multi leaf collimator (MLC) and couch accuracy tests have been performed to evaluate the delivery accuracy of the system. A mono-isocenter plan delivered in clinical practice has then been retrospectively re-planned with dual-isocenter technique. The dual-isocenter plan has been re-calculated and delivered on a 3-dimensional (3D) ArcCHECK phantom and 2-dimensional (2D) films to assess its dosimetric accuracy in terms of gamma analysis. Clinical and planning target volume (CTV and PTV respectively) coverage robustness was then investigated after the introduction of ± 2 mm and ± 5 mm positioning errors by shifting the couch.ResultsMLC and couch accuracy tests confirmed the system accuracy in delivering a dual-isocenter irradiation.2D/3D gamma analysis results occurred always to be above 95% if considered a gamma criteria 1%/2 mm and 1%/1 mm respectively for the 2D and 3D analysis.The mean variations for CTV D98% and PTV V95% were 0.2% and 1.1% respectively when positioning error was introduced separately in each direction, while the maximum observed variations were 0.9% (CTV) and 3.7% (PTV).ConclusionThe dosimetric accuracy of dual-isocenter irradiation has been verified for MR-Linac, achieving accurate and robust treatment strategy and improving dose conformality also in presence of targets whose extension exceeds the nominal maximum field size.     

Is IMAT the ultimate evolution of conformal radiotherapy? Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for oropharyngeal cancer in a planning study

BackgroundIntensity Modulated Arc Therapy (IMAT) can be planned and delivered via several techniques. Advanced Radiotherapy (ARTORL) is a prospective study that aims to evaluate the treatment costs and clinical aspects of implementing these IMAT techniques for head and neck cancers. In this context, we evaluated the potential dosimetric gain of Helical Tomotherapy (TomoTherapy, Accuray, HT) versus VMAT (Rapid'Arc^®, Varian Medical System, RA) for oropharyngeal cancer (OC).Material and methodsThirty patients were selected from our database in whom bilateral neck irradiation and treatment to the primary were indicated. Each patient was planned twice using both HT and RA planning systems using a simultaneous integrated boost approach. For the planning target volumes (PTV) and organs at risk, ICRU 83 reporting guidelines were followed. RA and HT plans were compared using paired Student's t-test.ResultsRA and HT produced plans with a good coverage of PTVs and acceptable sparing of OARs. Although some dosimetric differences were statistically significant, they remained small. However, the near maximal dose to the PRV of spinal cord and brain stem was lower with HT. Regarding normal tissue, HT increased the volume irradiated at doses between 4 and 20 Gy compared to RA.ConclusionIn OC, HT and RA showed similar dosimetric results. They represent the maximum gains obtained with photon beams. The medicoeconomic evaluation of our study is ongoing and may reveal differences between these techniques in terms of MU number, fraction time, and clinical evaluation.     

Clinical impact of dosimetric changes for volumetric modulated arc therapy in log file-based patient dose calculations

PurposeA log file-based method cannot detect dosimetric changes due to linac component miscalibration because log files are insensitive to miscalibration. Herein, clinical impacts of dosimetric changes on a log file-based method were determined.Methods and materialsFive head-and-neck and five prostate plans were applied. Miscalibration-simulated log files were generated by inducing a linac component miscalibration into the log file. Miscalibration magnitudes for leaf, gantry, and collimator at the general tolerance level were ±0.5 mm, ±1°, and ±1°, respectively, and at a tighter tolerance level achievable on current linac were ±0.3 mm, ±0.5°, and ±0.5°, respectively. Re-calculations were performed on patient anatomy using log file data.ResultsChanges in tumor control probability/normal tissue complication probability from treatment planning system dose to re-calculated dose at the general tolerance level was 1.8% on planning target volume (PTV) and 2.4% on organs at risk (OARs) in both plans. These changes at the tighter tolerance level were improved to 1.0% on PTV and to 1.5% on OARs, with a statistically significant difference.ConclusionsWe determined the clinical impacts of dosimetric changes on a log file-based method using a general tolerance level and a tighter tolerance level for linac miscalibration and found that a tighter tolerance level significantly improved the accuracy of the log file-based method.