Effects of muscarinic toxins MT1 and MT2 from green mamba on different muscarinic cholinoceptors

MT1 and MT2, polypeptides from green mamba venom, known to bind to muscarinic cholinoceptors, behave like muscarinic agonists in an inhibitory avoidance task in rats. We have further characterised their functional effects using different preparations. MT1 and MT2 behaved like relatively selective muscarinic M₁ receptor agonists in rabbit vas deferens, but their effects were not reversed by washing or prevented by muscarinic antagonists, although allosteric modulators altered responses to MT1. Radioligand binding experiments indicated that both toxins irreversibly inhibited [³H]N-methylscopolamine binding to cloned muscarinic M₁ and M₄ receptors, and reduced binding to M₅ subtype with lower affinity, while they reversibly inhibited the binding of [³H]prazosin to rat cerebral cortex and vas deferens, with 20 fold lower affinity. High concentrations of MT1 reversibly blocked responses of vas deferens to noradrenaline. MT1 and MT2 appear to irreversibly activate muscarinic M₁ receptors at a site distinct from the classical one, and to have affinity for some -adrenoceptors.     

Selective inactivation of muscarinic receptor subtypes

Muscarinic receptors exist in multiple subtypes, denoted as M₁, M₂ M₃ and M₄, encoded by four distinct but related genes. A fifth gene product, m5, has also been predicted although this sequence awaits a pharmacological equivalent. Many tissues express more than one muscarinic receptor subtype, which may couple to different intracellular effectors and thus have different physiological roles. One way to characterize the role of each receptor is to selectively inactivate one receptor population, thus pharmacologically ‘isolating’ the muscarinic receptor subtype of interest. Selective receptor inactivation can be achieved using either a selective, irreversible antagonist, or protection using a selective, reversible antagonist against a non-selective irreversible antagonist. Therefore, combination of these two approaches may provide optimal selective inactivation. Several muscarinic alkylating agents have been identified, including phenoxybenzamine, EEDQ (N-Ethoxycarbonyl-1-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline) and propylbenzilylcholine mustard. These irreversible antagonists do not, in general, discriminate between muscarinic receptor subtypes and are frequently used to estimate the affinity and relative efficacy of muscarinic agonists. Consequently, use of these irreversible antagonists provides estimations of the ‘receptor reserve’ associated with a response mediated by muscarinic receptor activation. In contrast, 4-DAMP mustard (4-diphenylacetoxy-N-(2-chloroethyl)piperidine) selectively inactivates M₃ receptors, but will not discriminate between M₁ M ₂ or M₄ receptors. In the absence of highly selective alkylating agents, receptor protection by reversible antagonists may be used. Thus, reversible antagonists, such as pirenzepine, methoctramine or para-fluorohexahydrosiladifenidol, at appropriate fractional receptor occupancies, may protect M₁ M₂ or M₃ receptors against alkylation by phenoxybenzamine. Selective alkylation of M₃ receptors by 4-DAMP mustard is enhanced with concurrent M₂ protection. This approach has been applied to defining the role of these muscarinic receptor subtypes in the control of ileal smooth muscle tone. These data suggest that, in ileum, M₂ receptors may act to inhibit β-adrenoceptor activation, thereby offsetting relaxation, while M₃ receptors directly mediate contraction.     

Interaction between the M2- and M3-Receptor Subtypes in Muscarinic Electrical and Mechanical Responses of Intestinal Smooth Muscles

In various gastrointestinal smooth muscles, two different muscarinic receptor subtypes, M₂ and M₃, are expressed; these receptors are the target for the parasympathetic neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Although the number of M₂ receptors is much greater than that of M₃ receptors, the functional role of the former receptor subtype has yet to be fully defined, since pharmacological analyses of the contractile responses to acetylcholine and other muscarinic agonists have revealed that such responses are mediated extensively by the minor M₃ subtype. The M₃ receptor links to Ca²⁺ store release, and the released Ca²⁺ ions may contribute to the contraction. However, many studies indicated the importance of Ca²⁺ influx through voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels, rather than Ca²⁺ release, in muscarinic contractions, since the contractile responses are markedly inhibited by Ca²⁺ channel blockers. The major M₂ receptors link to the opening of cationic channels leading to the membrane depolarization, which in turn activates voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels. Thus, there should be somewhere a point of contact between the M₃- and M₂-mediated signal transductions, as if M₃ receptor stimulation is connected with membrane depolarization. Our electrophysiological and pharmacological findings suggest that the M₂-mediated cationic channel opening and a resulting increase in the membrane electrical activity are the primary mechanism for mediating the contractile response to muscarinic agonists. An allosteric interaction between M₂ and M₃ receptors such that M₃ activation intensifies the M₂/cation channel pathway may account at least in part for the failure of many previous analyses to detect M₂ participation in the contractile responses to full agonists.     

M2-Muscarinic Receptors: How Does Ligand Binding Affinity Relate to Intrinsic Activity?

Abstract

In this study we looked for evidence regarding a correlation between M₂-muscarinic receptor binding affinity and ligand intrinsic activity. Guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptors have been shown to exist in both a high affinity and a low affinity, agonist state. The agonist [³H]Oxotremorine-M, was used to determine the affinity of compounds for the high affinity state and the antagonist, [³H]N-methylscopolamine, plus GppNHp, was used to determine the affinity for the low agonist state. The magnitude of the difference in the affinity a compound has for the high versus the low agonist state of the receptor has been related to the intrinsic activity of the compound. NMS/Oxo-M ratios were established for muscarinic agonists, partial agonists and antagonists. NMS/Oxo-M ratios varied from 1695 for the agonist carbachol to 1.9 for the antagonist AFDX-116 with intermediate values for the partial agonists oxotremorine-M, pilocarpine and RS86 (233, 36 and 17 respectively). Intrinsic activity was assessed by receptor-mediated G_i-protein GTPase activity. Indeed, a close correlation (r=0.92) was found between the NMS/Oxo-M ratios of the ligands on the one hand, and their ability to activate the M₂-receptor coupled G_i-protein on the other.     

Interactions between Allosteric Modulators and 4-DAMP and Other Antagonists at Muscarinic Receptors: Potential Significance of the Distance between the N and Carboxyl C Atoms in the Molecules of Antagonists

Allosteric enhancement of the affinity of muscarinic receptors for their ligands offers a new way to influence cholinergic neurotransmission. The structure of the allosteric binding domain(s) and the features of agonists, antagonists and modulators which determine the occurrence of either positive or negative cooperativity require clarification. We tested interactions between allosteric modulators alcuronium, strychnine and brucine and eight antagonists at muscarinic receptors expressed in CHO cells. In experiments with unlabeled antagonists, all three modulators enhanced the affinity for 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-dimethylpiperidinium (4-DAMP) at the M₂ receptors, and strychnine did so also at the M₄ receptors. Positive interactions were also observed between alcuronium and L-hyoscyamine (M₂) and scopolamine (M₂), between strychnine and butylscopolamine (M₄), L-hyoscyamine (M₂ and M₄) and scopolamine (M₄), and between brucine and scopolamine (M₂). Positive effects of alcuronium, strychnine and brucine on the affinity of the M₂ receptors for 4-DAMP have been confirmed by direct measurements of the binding of [³H]-4-DAMP. A comparison of molecular models of several antagonists which are esters revealed that antagonists in which the distance between the N and the carboxyl C atoms corresponds to five chemical bonds are more likely to display positive cooperativity with alcuronium at the M₂ receptors than the antagonists in which the N-carboxyl C distance corresponds to four chemical bonds.     

Membrane phospholipid polar heads influence the coupling of M2 muscarinic receptors to G proteins

Treating membranes from rat heart with phospholipase C (phosphatidylcholine choline-phosphohydrolase) fromClostridium perfringens increased the affinity of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M₂) for the agonists carbachol and oxotremorine. The affinity for antagonists was not affected. Phospholipase C activity, i.e., the cleavage of polar heads of membrane phospholipids, led to the disappearance of the guanine nucleotide-dependent rightward shift of the isotherm for agonist binding. The treatment of tracheal smooth muscle with phospholipase C led to a decrease in the maximum contractile effect of muscarinic (M₂) stimulation with no modification of the agonist EC₅₀, i.e., to the uncoupling of the stimulation-contraction process. These results demonstrate that when phospholipid polar heads are hydrolysed by phospholipase C, M₂ receptors are uncoupled from G proteins, which enhances their affinity for agonists but prevents information transfer.     

Coupling of G Proteins to Reconstituted Monomers and Tetramers of the M2 Muscarinic Receptor

G protein-coupled receptors can be reconstituted as monomers in nanodiscs and as tetramers in liposomes. When reconstituted with G proteins, both forms enable an allosteric interaction between agonists and guanylyl nucleotides. Both forms, therefore, are candidates for the complex that controls signaling at the level of the receptor. To identify the biologically relevant form, reconstituted monomers and tetramers of the purified M₂ muscarinic receptor were compared with muscarinic receptors in sarcolemmal membranes for the effect of guanosine 5′-[β,γ-imido]triphosphate (GMP-PNP) on the inhibition of N-[³H]methylscopolamine by the agonist oxotremorine-M. With monomers, a stepwise increase in the concentration of GMP-PNP effected a lateral, rightward shift in the semilogarithmic binding profile (i.e. a progressive decrease in the apparent affinity of oxotremorine-M). With tetramers and receptors in sarcolemmal membranes, GMP-PNP effected a vertical, upward shift (i.e. an apparent redistribution of sites from a state of high affinity to one of low affinity with no change in affinity per se). The data were analyzed in terms of a mechanistic scheme based on a ligand-regulated equilibrium between uncoupled and G protein-coupled receptors (the “ternary complex model”). The model predicts a rightward shift in the presence of GMP-PNP and could not account for the effects at tetramers in vesicles or receptors in sarcolemmal membranes. Monomers present a special case of the model in which agonists and guanylyl nucleotides interact within a complex that is both constitutive and stable. The results favor oligomers of the M₂ receptor over monomers as the biologically relevant state for coupling to G proteins.     

Benzylidene ketal derivatives as M2 muscarinic receptor antagonists

Benzylidene ketal derivatives were investigated as selective M₂ receptor antagonists for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Compound 10 was discovered to have subnanomolar M₂ receptor affinity and 100-fold selectivity against other muscarinic receptors. Also, 10 demonstrated in vivo efficacy in rodent models of muscarinic activity and cognition.     

M₅ muscarinic receptors mediate striatal dopamine activation by ventral tegmental morphine and pedunculopontine stimulation in mice

Opiates, like other addictive drugs, elevate forebrain dopamine levels and are thought to do so mainly by inhibiting GABA neurons near the ventral tegmental area (VTA), in turn leading to a disinhibition of dopamine neurons. However, cholinergic inputs from the laterodorsal (LDT) and pedunculopontine (PPT) tegmental nucleus to the VTA and substantia nigra (SN) importantly contribute, as either LDT or PPT lesions strongly attenuate morphine-induced forebrain dopamine elevations. Pharmacological blockade of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the VTA or SN has similar effects. M₅ muscarinic receptors are the only muscarinic receptor subtype associated with VTA and SN dopamine neurons. Here we tested the contribution of M₅ muscarinic receptors to morphine-induced dopamine elevations by measuring nucleus accumbens dopamine efflux in response to intra-VTA morphine infusion using in vivo chronoamperometry. Intra-VTA morphine increased nucleus accumbens dopamine efflux in urethane-anesthetized wildtype mice starting at 10 min after infusion. These increases were absent in M₅ knockout mice and were similarly blocked by pre-treatment with VTA scopolamine in wildtype mice. Furthermore, in wildtype mice electrical stimulation of the PPT evoked an initial, short-lasting increase in striatal dopamine efflux, followed 5 min later by a second prolonged increase in dopamine efflux. In M₅ knockout mice, or following systemic pre-treatment with scopolamine in wildtype mice, the prolonged increase in striatal dopamine efflux was absent. The time course of increased accumbal dopamine efflux in wildtype mice following VTA morphine was consistent with both the prolonged M₅-mediated excitation of striatal dopamine efflux following PPT electrical stimulation and accumbal dopamine efflux following LDT electrical stimulation. Therefore, M₅ receptors appear critical for prolonged PPT excitation of dopamine efflux and for dopamine efflux induced by intra-VTA morphine.     

Evaluation of 1,2,5-thiadiazoles as modulators of M1/M5 muscarinic receptor subtypes

Studies have demonstrated the presence of allosteric binding sites on each of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) subtypes. Since most drugs targeting muscarinic receptors bind to the highly conserved orthosteric binding site, they fail to achieve appreciable subtype selectivity. Targeting non-conserved allosteric sites may provide a new way of enhancing selectivity for individual subtypes of muscarinic receptor. Tetra(ethyleneglycol)(3-methoxy-1,2,5-thiadiazol-4-yl)[3-(1-methyl-1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyrid-3-yl)-1,2,5-thiadiazol-4-yl] ether, CDD-0304 (10), was found to be a M_1/2/4 selective muscarinic agonist and might prove useful in treating the symptoms associated with schizophrenia (J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 4273). It was hypothesized that the observed subtype selectivity demonstrated by 10 may be due to its ability to function as a bitopic ligand (J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 7518). To further investigate this possibility, a novel series of compounds was synthesized using a 1,2,5-thiadiazole moiety along with varying lengths of a polyethylene glycol linker and terminal groups, for evaluation as potential allosteric modulators of muscarinic receptors. Preliminary biological studies were performed using carbachol to stimulate M₁ and M₅ receptors. No significant agonist activity was observed at either M₁ or M₅ receptors for any of the compounds. Compound 18, 2-(4-methoxy-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yloxy)-N,N-dimethylethanamine fumarate (CDD-0361F) was found to block the effects of carbachol at M₅ muscarinic receptors.     

Regulation of putative muscarinic cholinergic receptor subtypes in rat brain

Transection of the fimbria/fornix, producing a 75% reduction in the activity of the cholinergic marker choline-o-acetyltransferase (CAT EC. 2.3.1.6) in rat hippocampus, did not change the binding characteristics of the non-subtype selective, muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist ligand [³H](−)quinuclidinyl benzilate {[³H](−)QNB}. Pirenzepine competition for [³H](−)QNB binding in the hippocampus was best described by a computer derived model assuming two binding sites of high affinity (putative M₁ receptors) and low affinity (putative M₂ receptors). There was no change in the proportion of high and low affinity pirenzepine binding sites in the hippocampus following cholinergic deafferentation. Thus, these data provide no evidence for a discrete localization of either putative subtype of muscarinic receptor discriminated by pirenzepine restricted to the terminals of CAT containing neurons innervating the rat hippocampus.Chronic scopolamine treatment produced a 48% increase in the B_max of [³H](−)QNB binding in the hippocampus, but again there was no change in the proportions of the sites discriminated by pirenzepine demonstrating that both putative subtypes were regulated identically. Similarly, carbachol competition for [³H](−)QNB was unaltered following cholinergic deafferentation or chronic scopolamine treatment. Furthermore, similar guanylyl-5′-imidodiphosphate [Gpp(NH)p] modulation of the proportions of high and low affinity carbachol binding sites was found in the hippocampus following transection of the fimbria/fornix or chronic scopolamine treatment. Thus there is no adaptation of receptor-effector coupling following these treatments that is reflected by changes in receptor recognition site characteristics.Carbachol competition for [³H]pirenzepine binding to putative M₁ receptors in the hippocampus was biphasic and was also modulated by Gpp(NH)p. In the brainstem, there was a homogeneous population of putative M₂ [³H](−)QNB binding sites having low affinity for pirenzepine. Carbachol competition for these binding sites was also biphasic and modulated by guanine nucleotides. Thus, both putative M₁ and M₂ muscarinic receptors, as defined by high or low affinity for pirenzepine respectively, may mediate their effects in rat brain via a guanine nucleotide regulatory subunit.     

FRET-based sensors for the human M1-, M3-, and M5-acetylcholine receptors

Based on the recently developed approach to generate fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based sensors to measure GPCR activation, we generated sensor constructs for the human M₁-, M₃-, and M₅-acetylcholine receptor. The receptors were labeled with cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) at their C-terminus, and with fluorescein arsenical hairpin binder (FlAsH) via tetra-cysteine tags inserted in the third intracellular loop. We then measured FRET between the donor CFP and the acceptor FlAsH in living cells and real time. Agonists like acetylcholine, carbachol, or muscarine activate each receptor construct with half-maximal activation times between 60 and 70 ms. Removal of the agonist caused the reversal of the signal. Compared with all other agonists, oxotremorine M differed in two major aspects: it caused significantly slower signals at M₁- and M₅-acetylcholine receptors and the amplitude of these signals was larger at the M₁-acetylcholine receptor. Concentration-response curves for the agonists reveal that all agonists tested, with the mentioned exception of oxotremorine M, caused similar maximal FRET-changes as acetylcholine for the M₁-, M₃- and M₅-acetylcholine receptor constructs. Taken together our data support the notion that orthosteric agonists behave similar at different muscarinic receptor subtypes but that kinetic differences can be observed for receptor activation.     

A unique regulatory profile and regional distribution of [3H]pirenzepine binding in the rat provide evidence for distinct M1 and M2 muscarinic receptor subtypes

We recently demonstrated that the non-classical muscarinic receptor antagonist [³H]pirenzepine ([³H]PZ) identifies a high affinity population of muscarinic sites in the rat cerebral cortex. We now report that cortical muscarinic sites to which [³H]PZ binds with high affinity are modulated by ions but not guanine nucleotides. We also have examined equilibrium [³H]PZ binding in homogenates of various rat tissues using a new rapid filtration assay. All regional saturation isotherms yielded a similar high affinity dissociation constant (K_d = 2 ? 8 nM) in 10 mM sodium-potassium phosphate buffer. Receptor density (B_max in fmol/mg tissue) varied as follows: corpus striatum = 154.5, cerebral cortex = 94.6, hippocampus = 94.3, ileum = 1.3, cerebellum = 1.0, and heart = 0.45. The cerebral cortex and hippocampus possess 61 percent of striatal binding sites, while the ileum, cerebellum and heart contain only 0.84 percent, 0.65 percent and 0.29 percent of striatal sites respectively. The [³H]PZ sites in heart, ileum, and cerebellum represent 3.1 percent, 9.6 percent, and 10.4 percent of the sites obtained by using [³H](?)quinuclidinyl benzilate. Thus, [³H]PZ labels high affinity muscarinic receptor binding sites with a tissue distribution compatible with the concept of distinct M₁ and M₂ receptor subtypes. Accordingly, regions such as heart, cerebellum, and ileum would be termed M₂, though each have an extremely small population of the M₁ high affinity [³H]PZ site. [³H]PZ therefore appears to be a useful ligand for M₁ receptor identification. Furthermore, the inability to demonstrate a significant effect of guanine nucleotides upon high affinity [³H]PZ binding to putative M₁ receptors suggests that M₁ sites may be independent of a guanine regulatory protein.     

A Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer-based M2 Muscarinic Receptor Sensor Reveals Rapid Kinetics of Allosteric Modulation

Allosteric modulators have been identified for several G protein-coupled receptors, most notably muscarinic receptors. To study their mechanism of action, we made use of a recently developed technique to generate fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based sensors to monitor G protein-coupled receptor activation. Cyan fluorescent protein was fused to the C terminus of the M₂ muscarinic receptor, and a specific binding sequence for the small fluorescent compound fluorescein arsenical hairpin binder, FlAsH, was inserted into the third intracellular loop; the latter site was labeled in intact cells by incubation with FlAsH. We then measured FRET between the donor cyan fluorescent protein and the acceptor FlAsH in intact cells and monitored its changes in real time. Agonists such as acetylcholine and carbachol induced rapid changes in FRET, indicative of agonist-induced conformational changes. Removal of the agonists or addition of an antagonist caused a reversal of this signal with rate constants between 400 and 1100 ms. The allosteric ligands gallamine and dimethyl-W84 caused no changes in FRET when given alone, but increased FRET when given in the presence of an agonist, compatible with an inactivation of the receptors. The kinetics of these effects were very rapid, with rate constants of 80–100 ms and ≈200 ms for saturating concentrations of gallamine and dimethyl-W84, respectively. Because these speeds are significantly faster than the responses to antagonists, these data indicate that gallamine and dimethyl-W84 are allosteric ligands and actively induce a conformation of the M₂ receptor with a reduced affinity for its agonists.     

Regulation of ligand binding to cardiac muscarinic receptors by ammonium ion and guanine nucleotides

Guanine nucleotides and Na⁺ are known to regulate ligand binding to cardiac muscarinic receptors, which are netagively couple to the adenylate cyclase system. In the present study, we found that NH₄⁺ was more potent than Na⁺ or other monovalent cations in regulating the affinity of the muscarinic receptor for agonists and antagonists. The effect of NH₄⁺ (or Na⁺) on the binding of the antagonist [³H]quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) to muscarinic receptors in homogenates of embryonic chick hearts depended on the assay buffer used. NH₄⁺ increased K_d in phosphate buffer or histidine and increased B_max in Tris. NH_f4⁺ (0.1 M) increased the IC₅₀ value for actylcholine inhibition of [³H]QNB binding 20-fold compared to 3–4-fold with 0.1 M Na⁺ or K⁺. Furthermore, NH₄⁺ could substitute for and was more potent than Na⁺ in producing synergistic effects with Gpp[NH]p to reduce the affinity of the receptor of acetylcholine. Tris depressed these effects. Gpp[NH]p plus 0.4 M NH₄Cl totally converted the receptor population to a low affinity agonist state and increased the IC₅₀ for acetylcholine by more than 2000-fold. Two conclusions can be made from the present results. First, NH₄⁺ appears to be the most potent effector yet studied of the monovalent cation site of the muscarinic receptor system. Second, the use of Tris in muscarinic receptor ligand binding assays will produce anomalous results concerning the properties of both agonist antagonist binding to the receptor.     

The effect of chronic neuroleptic administration on cerebral dopamine receptor function

Acute administration of neuroleptic drugs causes blockade of cerebral dopamine receptors. It has been discovered that chronic administration of neuroleptic drugs may have different effects on cerebral dopamine systems. Initial antagonism of dopamine mediated behaviour, such as stereotypy, disappears and may be replaced by supersensitivity to dopamine agonists. Changes also occur in biochemical indices of dopamine receptors, such as in the number and affinity of specific binding sites identified by ³H-ligands labelling D-2 receptors, and in dopamine-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity. All these changes occur obviously in the striatum in response to chronic administration of a range of neuroleptic drugs. Lesser changes take place in the mesolimbic dopamine system. What happens in the mesocortical dopamine pathways is unknown. The consequence of such adaptive responses to chronic neuroleptic therapy may be of importance to understanding of tardive dyskinesia and schizophrenia.     

Differential effects of paraoxon on the M3 muscarinic receptor and its effector system in rat submaxillary gland cells

The effects of the organophosphorus anticholinesterase paraoxon on the binding of radioactive ligands to the M₃ subtype of the muscarinic receptor and receptor-coupled synthesis of second messengers in intact rat submaxillary gland (SMG) cells were investigated. The binding of [³H]quinuclidinyl benzilate ([³H]QNB) was most sensitive to atropine and the M₃-specific antagonist 4-DAMP followed by pirenzepine and least sensitive to the cardioselective M₂ antagonist AFDX116. This, and the binding characteristics of [³H]4-DAMP, confirmed that the muscarinic receptors in this preparation are of the M₃ subtype. Activation of these muscarinic receptors by carbamylcholine (CBC) produced both stimulation of phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis and inhibition of cAMP synthesis, suggesting that this receptor subtype couples to both effector systems. Paraoxon (100 μM) reduced B_max of [³H]4-DAMP binding from 27 ± 4 to 13 ± 3 fmol/mg protein with nonsignificant change in affinity, suggesting noncompetitive inhibition of binding by paraoxon. Like the agonist CBC, paraoxon inhibited the forskolininduced cAMP formation in SMG cells with an EC₅₀ of 200 nM, but paraoxon was > 500 fold more potent than CBC. However, while the inhibition by CBC was counteracted by 2 μM atropine, that by paraoxon was unaffected by up to 100 μM atropine. It suggested that this effect of paraoxon was not via binding to the muscarinic receptor. Paraoxon did not affect β-adrenoreceptor function in the preparation, since it did not affect the 10 μM isoproterenol-induced cAMP synthesis, which was inhibited totally by 10 μM propranolol and partially by CBC. Paraoxon had a small but significant effect on CBC-stimulated PI metabolism in the SMG cells. It is suggested that paraoxon binds to two different sites in these SMG cells. One is an allosteric site on the M₃ muscarinic receptor which affects ligand binding and may modulate receptor function. The other site may be on the G_i proteinadenylyl cyclase system, and produces CBC-like action, that is, inhibition of the forskolin-stimulated [³H]cAMP synthesis, and is unaffected by atropine inhibition of the muscarinic receptor. This adds to the complexity of paraoxon actions on muscarinic receptors and their effector systems.     

Dopamine D1B Receptor Chimeras Reveal Modulation of Partial Agonist Activity by Carboxyl-Terminal Tail Sequences

Abstract: NNC 01-0012, a second-generation benzazepine compound, pharmacologically differentiates multiple vertebrate D1 receptor subtypes (D1A, D1B, D1C, and D1D) and displays high selectivity and affinity for dopamine D1C receptors. Functionally, whereas NNC 01-0012 acts as a full or poor antagonist at D1C and D1A receptor-mediated cyclic AMP production, respectively, it exhibits partial agonist activity at the D1B receptor. To define some of the structural motifs that regulate the pharmacological and functional differentiation of vertebrate dopamine D1 receptors by NNC 01-0012, a series of receptor chimeras were constructed in which the divergent carboxyl-terminal (CT) receptor tails were replaced with the corresponding sequences of D1A, D1B, or D1C receptors. Substitution of the vertebrate D1B carboxyl-terminal-tail at position Tyr³⁴⁵ with carboxyl-terminal-tail sequences of the D1A receptor abolished the partial agonist activity of NNC 01-0012 without affecting dopamine-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation. At vertebrate D1B/D1Cct -tail receptor mutants, however, the intrinsic activity of the partial agonist NNC 01-0012 (10 µM) was markedly enhanced (～60% relative to 10 µM dopamine) with no concomitant alteration in the molecule's ligand binding affinity or constitutive activity of the chimeric receptor. Similar results were obtained with other benzazepines such as SKF-38393 and SCH-23390, which act as partial agonists at vertebrate D1B receptors. Substitution of D1A and D1C receptor carboxyl-terminal tails with sequences encoded by the D1B receptor carboxyl-terminal tail did not, however, produce receptors with functional characteristics significantly different from wild type. Taken together, these data clearly suggest that in addition to well-characterized domains and amino acid residues in the third cytoplasmic loop, partial agonist activity at the D1B receptor is modulated by sequence-specific motifs within the carboxyl-terminal tail, a region that may underlie the possible structural basis for functionally divergent roles of multiple dopamine D1-like receptors.     

AGAP1/AP‐3‐dependent endocytic recycling of M5 muscarinic receptors promotes dopamine release

Of the five mammalian muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors, M₅ is the only subtype expressed in midbrain dopaminergic neurons, where it functions to potentiate dopamine release. We have identified a direct physical interaction between M₅ and the AP‐3 adaptor complex regulator AGAP1. This interaction was specific with regard to muscarinic receptor (MR) and AGAP subtypes, and mediated the binding of AP‐3 to M₅. Interaction with AGAP1 and activity of AP‐3 were required for the endocytic recycling of M₅ in neurons, the lack of which resulted in the downregulation of cell surface receptor density after sustained receptor stimulation. The elimination of AP‐3 or abrogation of AGAP1–M₅ interaction in vivo decreased the magnitude of presynaptic M₅‐mediated dopamine release potentiation in the striatum. Our study argues for the presence of a previously unknown receptor‐recycling pathway that may underlie mechanisms of G‐protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) homeostasis. These results also suggest a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of dopaminergic dysfunction.     

Himbacine discriminates between putative muscarinic M1 receptor-mediated responses

This study describes the antagonistic properties of himbacine, in comparison with those of pirenzepine, at muscarinic receptors mediating the depolarization of rat superior cervical ganglion, the inhibition of electrically-induced twitch contractions of rabbit vas deferens and the contraction of dog saphenous vein, currently classified as putative muscarinic M₁ sites. The affinity of himbacine for the vas deferens site (pA₂ 8.08) was nearly ten times higher than those for the M₁ receptors of rat ganglion and dog saphenous vein (pA₂ 7.14 and 7.16, respectively); affinity estimates for pirenzepine were similar throughout the different preparations. The present data are consistent with the allocation of ganglion and saphenous vein receptors into the M₁ subclass; the profile of the vas deferens site, conversely, appears to be different, and possibly more closely related to that reported for the M₄/m4 receptor.